Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardEnd-of-Life Care Ethics

A 54-year-old woman with metastatic ovarian cancer is evaluated in the intensive care unit following admission for septic shock and multiorgan failure. Despite aggressive vasopressor support and broad-spectrum antibiotics, her condition rapidly deteriorates over the next 48 hours. She is currently intubated, comatose, and lacks decision-making capacity. The primary care physician provides the intensive care team with the patient's legally valid living will, executed one year ago. The document explicitly states that she refuses mechanical ventilation, artificial nutrition, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation if she develops a terminal illness with no reasonable hope of recovery. The patient's husband, who is her legal next-of-kin, reads the document but demands that the medical team continue all life-sustaining interventions, stating, 'I know what the paper says, but I am her husband and I cannot let her go yet. I am deciding to keep her on the ventilator.' The patient has no designated healthcare proxy. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in the management of this patient?

  1. Withdraw mechanical ventilation in accordance with the stipulations of the living will.Answer
  2. B
    Continue mechanical ventilation because the husband serves as the primary surrogate decision-maker.
  3. C
    Request a formal psychiatric consultation to evaluate the husband's legal competence to make decisions.
  4. D
    Transfer the patient to a long-term acute care hospital to allow the husband time to accept the prognosis.
  5. E
    Defer the decision to the hospital ethics committee as they hold the legal authority to invalidate the living will.

Answer

Withdraw mechanical ventilation in accordance with the stipulations of the living will.
The correct action is to withdraw mechanical ventilation based on the living will. An advance directive (living will) is a legal document that expresses a patient's healthcare wishes in the event they lose decision-making capacity. Because the patient is comatose with a terminal, irreversible condition, her living will is actively applicable. The ethical principle of autonomy dictates that a patient's previously stated, documented wishes supersede the desires of family members. A surrogate decision-maker (like the husband) cannot legally override a valid living will simply out of grief or a desire for a different outcome.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine the patient's clinical status and capacity.
The patient is comatose, lacks decision-making capacity, and has a terminal condition with no reasonable hope of recovery.
Establishing capacity and prognosis is required before invoking advance directives or surrogate decision-makers.
2
Evaluate the available legal and ethical directives.
A legally valid living will is present, explicitly refusing mechanical ventilation in this exact clinical scenario.
Written advance directives are the strongest legal representation of an incapacitated patient's autonomy.
3
Assess the authority of the surrogate decision-maker's objection.
The husband's demand to continue life support contradicts the living will.
A default surrogate's role is substituted judgment. A surrogate cannot legally or ethically override a patient's documented, applicable advance directive.
4
Select the appropriate clinical action.
Honor the living will by withdrawing mechanical ventilation.
The physician's primary duty is to respect the patient's autonomy as expressed in her legal directive.

Key Concept

A legally valid and clinically applicable living will supersedes the contradictory wishes of a default surrogate decision-maker, as it represents the patient's direct autonomous choice.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

End-of-Life Care Ethics

More questions from this topic