Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardEnd-of-Life Care Ethics

A 75-year-old woman with metastatic pancreatic cancer is admitted to the intensive care unit with urosepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome. She is intubated and mechanically ventilated. She is currently deeply sedated and lacks decisional capacity. Five years ago, she executed a living will stating she would not want life-sustaining treatments, including mechanical ventilation or dialysis, if she developed a terminal illness. At that time, she also appointed her eldest son as her healthcare proxy (durable power of attorney for healthcare).

The patient develops severe oliguria, and the nephrology service recommends continuous renal replacement therapy. The attending physician meets with the son to discuss transitioning to comfort measures only, referencing the living will. The son insists on starting renal replacement therapy. He explains, "I know what the document says, but three weeks ago, after she learned her daughter was pregnant with her first grandchild, she explicitly told me that she had changed her mind. She said she wants everything medically possible done so she can survive to see the baby born."

There is no other family present, and the nursing staff notes that the son has been a consistently devoted caregiver. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?

  1. A
    Decline to initiate continuous renal replacement therapy because the written living will supersedes verbal statements
  2. Initiate continuous renal replacement therapy as directed by the patient's healthcare proxyAnswer
  3. C
    Consult the hospital ethics committee to mediate the conflict between the living will and the proxy
  4. D
    Proceed with comfort measures only after obtaining a corroborating second opinion from another attending physician
  5. E
    Request a psychiatric consultation to assess the son's competence to act as a surrogate decision-maker

Answer

Initiate continuous renal replacement therapy as directed by the patient's healthcare proxy.
The central ethical principle in end-of-life care is respect for patient autonomy. An advance directive (such as a living will) provides a mechanism for patients to express their preferences for future medical care when they lack decisional capacity. However, a competent patient retains the right to revoke or modify an advance directive at any time, including verbally. When a patient designates a healthcare proxy (durable power of attorney for healthcare), the proxy's role is to exercise 'substituted judgment'—making the decision the patient would make if they were currently able to do so. In this scenario, the son is not demanding care based on his own inability to let go; rather, he is providing specific, logical, and recent evidence that the patient's wishes changed prior to her loss of capacity. Because the proxy is communicating the patient's most recent autonomous choice, this verbal update supersedes the older written document. The most appropriate action is to honor the patient's updated wishes and initiate the requested therapy.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the patient's current clinical status and decisional capacity.
The patient is critically ill, deeply sedated, and lacks the capacity to make medical decisions, necessitating the use of advance directives or a surrogate.
Decisional capacity determines whether the patient can direct their own care or if substituted judgment must be applied.
2
Evaluate the legal standing of the available advance directives and surrogate decision-makers.
The patient has a valid living will from five years ago and a legally appointed healthcare proxy (the son), who holds the highest priority in the surrogate hierarchy.
A designated healthcare proxy is authorized to make decisions based on what the patient would want if they were currently able to communicate.
3
Determine the appropriate resolution when there is a conflict between an older written directive and the proxy's report of recent verbal wishes.
The proxy reports a specific, contextually appropriate conversation from three weeks ago indicating a change in the patient's wishes. This recent verbal update must be honored.
The principle of substituted judgment requires honoring the patient's most recent autonomous choices. A competent patient can verbally revoke or modify a living will at any time.

Key Concept

Substituted judgment and the supremacy of a competent patient's most recent wishes (including verbal updates conveyed by a proxy) over an older written advance directive.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

End-of-Life Care Ethics

More questions from this topic