All practice questions

4736 questions

Question 4241Question →

An internal medicine physician is evaluating a 72-year-old man for worsening renal function discovered on routine laboratory monitoring. The patient has a history of resistant hypertension that has been difficult to control despite maximum tolerated doses of amlodipine, metoprolol, and chlorthalidone. Three weeks ago, lisinopril was added to his medication regimen to achieve better blood pressure control. The patient currently feels well and denies any headache, chest pain, shortness of breath, or changes in urination.

Vital signs today show a blood pressure of 182/98 mmHg and a heart rate of 74/min. Physical examination is notable for a high-pitched holosystolic murmur heard best over the right upper quadrant of the abdomen.

Current laboratory studies are compared to baseline from three weeks ago:

ParameterCurrent3 Weeks Ago
Serum sodium139 mEq/L140 mEq/L
Serum potassium4.8 mEq/L4.1 mEq/L
Blood urea nitrogen34 mg/dL16 mg/dL
Serum creatinine2.6 mg/dL1.1 mg/dL

Urinalysis reveals no red blood cells, white blood cells, or casts.

Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in the diagnostic evaluation of this patient's hypertension?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Duplex Doppler ultrasonography of the kidneys

Answer

Duplex Doppler ultrasonography of the kidneys is the most appropriate next diagnostic step because it safely evaluates for renal artery stenosis without the use of nephrotoxic contrast in a patient with acute kidney injury.
The correct answer is the non-invasive ultrasound study. This patient's presentation of resistant hypertension, a right-sided abdominal bruit, and a sudden, significant rise in serum creatinine (from 1.1 mg/dL to 2.6 mg/dL) following the initiation of an ACE inhibitor is the classic clinical picture of renovascular hypertension due to bilateral renal artery stenosis. In the setting of bilateral disease, the glomerular filtration rate is highly dependent on angiotensin II-mediated efferent arteriole vasoconstriction. Blocking this mechanism with an ACE inhibitor leads to a precipitous drop in renal function. To establish the diagnosis in a patient with acute kidney injury, the chosen diagnostic modality must not further deteriorate renal function. Duplex Doppler ultrasonography of the kidneys is the most appropriate next step because it is non-invasive, avoids nephrotoxic contrast, and provides reliable evaluation of renal blood flow and arterial waveforms.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the patient's clinical presentation and medication history.
The patient has resistant hypertension, a new abdominal bruit, and developed acute kidney injury immediately after the initiation of an ACE inhibitor (lisinopril).
Identifying this classic triad of findings is essential to formulate the correct differential diagnosis of renovascular hypertension.
2
Identify the underlying physiological mechanism causing the acute presentation.
The presentation is highly characteristic of bilateral renal artery stenosis.
In bilateral disease, glomerular filtration is maintained by angiotensin II-mediated efferent arteriole vasoconstriction. ACE inhibitors block this compensation, leading to an acute rise in serum creatinine.
3
Determine the safest and most appropriate initial diagnostic imaging test.
Duplex Doppler ultrasonography is selected.
The patient has acute kidney injury, which contraindicates the use of iodinated contrast (used in CT angiography) and gadolinium (used in MR angiography). Ultrasound safely assesses renal perfusion.

Key Concept

In patients with suspected renal artery stenosis who present with concomitant acute kidney injury, duplex Doppler ultrasonography is the preferred initial diagnostic imaging modality because it avoids the administration of nephrotoxic contrast agents.
Question 4242Question →

A 32-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department by her husband after experiencing a witnessed generalized tonic-clonic seizure. The patient is 3 weeks postpartum following an uncomplicated vaginal delivery with epidural anesthesia. Her husband reports that she has been complaining of a progressively worsening, diffuse headache for the past 4 days. She has no prior history of seizures. During her pregnancy, she had diet-controlled gestational diabetes, but her blood pressure was normal. On presentation, she is lethargic and oriented to person only. Her blood pressure is 148/92 mmHg, heart rate is 94/min, and temperature is 37.1°C (98.8°F). Funduscopic examination reveals bilateral papilledema. Neurological examination demonstrates 4/5 motor strength in the right upper and lower extremities. Urine dipstick shows trace protein.

Arrange the following differential diagnoses in order from highest pre-test probability to lowest pre-test probability based on this patient's clinical presentation.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence from highest to lowest pre-test probability is: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, Late postpartum eclampsia, Subarachnoid hemorrhage, and Postdural puncture headache.
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis perfectly matches the hypercoagulable postpartum state, progressive timeline, elevated intracranial pressure, and focal deficits. Eclampsia is a strong secondary consideration due to the postpartum seizure and mild hypertension, but lacks typical focal features. Subarachnoid hemorrhage is less likely due to the insidious onset rather than a thunderclap presentation. Postdural puncture headache is excluded by the timeline (3 weeks later), lack of postural nature, and presence of severe neurological signs.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the patient's timeline and key presenting symptoms.
The patient is 3 weeks postpartum presenting with a progressive headache, new-onset seizure, papilledema, and right-sided focal weakness.
Identifying the timeline (late postpartum) and distinguishing features (focal deficits, papilledema) is essential for framing and stratifying the differential diagnosis.
2
Evaluate the highest probability diagnosis.
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is placed first.
The postpartum period is a highly thrombogenic state. A progressive headache culminating in a seizure, combined with signs of elevated intracranial pressure (papilledema) and focal neurological deficits (venous infarction), is the classic presentation of CVST.
3
Assess the likelihood of eclampsia relative to other conditions.
Late postpartum eclampsia is placed second.
Although the patient has mild hypertension, trace proteinuria, and is within the 4-week window for late eclampsia, the presence of unilateral focal motor deficits and papilledema are atypical for eclampsia, pointing more strongly to a localized lesion like CVST.
4
Determine the probability of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).
Subarachnoid hemorrhage is placed third.
SAH can cause seizures and focal deficits, but the headache is typically abrupt ('thunderclap') in onset rather than progressively worsening over four days.
5
Evaluate postdural puncture headache (PDPH).
Postdural puncture headache is placed fourth (lowest probability).
While she had an epidural, PDPH typically occurs within 72 hours of the procedure, is strongly postural, and does not cause seizures, focal weakness, or papilledema.

Key Concept

In the hypercoagulable postpartum period, a progressive headache accompanied by focal neurological deficits and seizures should raise high suspicion for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, taking precedence over late postpartum eclampsia.
Question 4243Question →

A 42-year-old previously healthy woman arrives at the emergency department reporting the sudden onset of severe, continuous pain in her upper abdomen that radiates directly to her mid-back. She has vomited three times since the pain started four hours ago. She reports no recent alcohol use or new medications. Her temperature is 37.8°C (100.0°F), blood pressure is 135/85 mm Hg, pulse is 110/min, and respiratory rate is 18/min. Examination reveals significant tenderness in the epigastric region with voluntary guarding, but no rebound tenderness or rigidity. Bowel sounds are hypoactive. Which of the following diagnostic studies should be ordered concurrently as part of this patient's initial evaluation? (Select all that apply)

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Serum lipase concentration; Transabdominal ultrasonography of the right upper quadrant

Answer

The correct initial diagnostic tests are a serum lipase concentration and transabdominal ultrasonography of the right upper quadrant.
The patient's presentation of severe epigastric pain radiating to the back with nausea and vomiting is classic for acute pancreatitis. The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis requires two of three criteria: characteristic abdominal pain, elevated serum lipase (typically greater than three times the upper limit of normal), and characteristic findings on cross-sectional imaging. Therefore, a serum lipase measurement is an essential initial test to confirm the diagnosis. Concurrently, because gallstones are the most common etiology of acute pancreatitis, current guidelines strongly recommend a transabdominal right upper quadrant ultrasound in all patients during their initial evaluation to assess for cholelithiasis and biliary duct dilation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the clinical presentation.
The patient presents with severe epigastric pain radiating to the back, accompanied by nausea and vomiting, which is the classic presentation for acute pancreatitis.
Recognizing the most likely diagnosis dictates the initial diagnostic workup.
2
Apply the diagnostic criteria for acute pancreatitis.
Diagnosis requires at least two of the following: characteristic abdominal pain, serum lipase >3 times the upper limit of normal, and characteristic imaging findings.
Because the clinical pain is characteristic, measuring serum lipase is the most sensitive and specific next step to fulfill the criteria.
3
Determine the necessary concurrent workup for etiology.
Gallstones are the most common cause of acute pancreatitis worldwide. Right upper quadrant ultrasonography is the most sensitive non-invasive test for cholelithiasis.
Guidelines mandate early ultrasound in all patients with acute pancreatitis to identify biliary etiologies that might require early intervention.

Key Concept

The initial evaluation of suspected acute pancreatitis requires concurrent measurement of serum lipase to establish the diagnosis and a right upper quadrant transabdominal ultrasound to evaluate for biliary etiology.
Question 4244Question →

A 34-year-old woman presents to the clinic for evaluation of left calf pain and swelling that began two days ago. Venous duplex ultrasonography confirms a deep vein thrombosis. Her medical history is significant for an unprovoked pulmonary embolism 3 years ago and one pregnancy that ended in fetal demise at 14 weeks gestation. She currently takes no medications. Vital signs are within normal limits.

Laboratory results:

TestResultReference Range
White blood cell count6,500/mm36,500/\text{mm}^34,500−11,000/mm34,500-11,000/\text{mm}^3
Hemoglobin12.8 g/dL12.8 \text{ g/dL}12.0−15.5 g/dL12.0-15.5 \text{ g/dL}
Platelet count115,000/mm3115,000/\text{mm}^3150,000−400,000/mm3150,000-400,000/\text{mm}^3
Prothrombin time (PT)13 seconds13 \text{ seconds}11−15 seconds11-15 \text{ seconds}
Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)68 seconds68 \text{ seconds}25−40 seconds25-40 \text{ seconds}

A mixing study is performed, in which the patient's plasma is combined 1:1 with pooled normal plasma. The immediate aPTT of the mixture is 64 seconds64 \text{ seconds}, and the aPTT after a 2-hour incubation remains 65 seconds65 \text{ seconds}.

Based on the interpretation of these laboratory results, which of the following is the most likely explanation for the patient's prolonged aPTT?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: In vitro assay interference by autoantibodies targeting phospholipid-protein complexes

Answer

In vitro assay interference by autoantibodies targeting phospholipid-protein complexes
The patient's clinical presentation of unprovoked DVT, previous pulmonary embolism, and mid-trimester fetal demise is classic for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). A hallmark laboratory finding in APS is a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) that fails to correct when the patient's plasma is mixed with normal plasma. This failure to correct indicates the presence of a circulating inhibitor rather than a coagulation factor deficiency. In APS, the inhibitor is the lupus anticoagulant, an autoantibody that binds to phospholipid-protein complexes. Because the aPTT assay relies on phospholipids to catalyze the coagulation cascade, these antibodies interfere with the assay in vitro, leading to an artificially prolonged aPTT. Paradoxically, in vivo, these antibodies create a highly prothrombotic state. The patient's mild thrombocytopenia is also a common associated manifestation of APS.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the patient's clinical syndrome based on her history.
The patient has a history of unprovoked DVT, pulmonary embolism, and mid-trimester fetal loss, indicating a highly hypercoagulable state.
Establishing the clinical phenotype is necessary to interpret the laboratory abnormalities in the correct context.
2
Interpret the basic coagulation panel.
The patient has an isolated prolongation of the aPTT with a normal PT and mild thrombocytopenia.
Isolating the specific pathway involved narrows the differential diagnosis.
3
Analyze the mixing study results.
The prolonged aPTT fails to correct when mixed 1:1 with normal plasma.
A failure to correct distinguishes the presence of a circulating inhibitor (antibody) from a simple coagulation factor deficiency.
4
Synthesize the laboratory and clinical findings to determine the underlying mechanism.
An inhibitor causing isolated aPTT prolongation in a patient with severe thrombosis and fetal loss is characteristic of the lupus anticoagulant seen in antiphospholipid syndrome.
Lupus anticoagulant binds to assay phospholipids in vitro (delaying clot formation) but promotes thrombosis in vivo.

Key Concept

Interpretation of mixing studies to differentiate factor deficiencies from circulating inhibitors, specifically identifying lupus anticoagulant in antiphospholipid syndrome.
Question 4245Question →

Chronic diarrhea has a broad differential diagnosis, but careful evaluation of extraintestinal manifestations can often lead to a specific etiology. Match each patient's clinical presentation of chronic diarrhea and systemic symptoms with the most likely underlying diagnosis.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

A 42-year-old man presents with chronic watery diarrhea and recurrent abdominal pain. Upper endoscopy reveals multiple duodenal ulcers and prominently thickened gastric folds.
A 35-year-old woman presents with chronic diarrhea, fatigue, and an intensely pruritic, grouped vesicular skin eruption on her extensor surfaces. Laboratory studies show microcytic anemia.
A 50-year-old man presents with chronic diarrhea, significant unintentional weight loss, migratory large-joint arthralgias, and recent-onset memory impairment.
A 28-year-old woman presents with episodic watery diarrhea, paroxysmal facial flushing, intermittent wheezing, and a newly appreciated right-sided systolic heart murmur.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct matches pair each distinct systemic presentation of chronic diarrhea with its underlying etiology: Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (acid hypersecretion), Celiac disease (dermatitis herpetiformis), Whipple disease (arthralgias and cognitive decline), and Carcinoid syndrome (flushing and right-sided murmur).
Each patient's clinical vignette contains highly specific systemic manifestations that narrow the broad differential diagnosis of chronic diarrhea down to a single unifying diagnosis. Identifying these key extraintestinal signs is essential for accurate diagnosis and management.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the extraintestinal symptoms in the 42-year-old man.
Refractory ulcers and thickened gastric folds suggest profound acid hypersecretion.
To identify Zollinger-Ellison syndrome as the cause of diarrhea.
2
Evaluate the dermatologic findings in the 35-year-old woman.
Pruritic vesicles on extensor surfaces are classic for dermatitis herpetiformis.
To link the presentation to Celiac disease.
3
Assess the combination of joint and neurologic findings in the 50-year-old man.
Migratory arthralgias and cognitive decline with diarrhea indicate systemic infection with Tropheryma whipplei.
To formulate the differential of Whipple disease.
4
Identify the vascular and cardiac signs in the 28-year-old woman.
Flushing, wheezing, and tricuspid murmur are signs of vasoactive substance release.
To diagnose Carcinoid syndrome.

Key Concept

Formulating a differential diagnosis for chronic diarrhea based on distinct extraintestinal manifestations.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 4246Question →

A 28-year-old man is brought to the emergency department by emergency medical services after being rescued from a residential house fire. Firefighters report that he was trapped in a closed, smoke-filled bedroom for approximately 10 minutes before being extracted. On arrival, the patient is agitated and speaking in a hoarse voice. He is coughing up dark, carbonaceous sputum. Physical examination reveals partial-thickness burns over his anterior chest and bilateral upper extremities, estimated to involve 18% of his total body surface area. Examination of the face reveals singed nasal hairs, soot in the oropharynx, and mild facial erythema. Lung auscultation demonstrates diffuse bilateral wheezing. Vital signs are: temperature 37.1°C (98.8°F), pulse 122/min, blood pressure 114/72 mm Hg, respiratory rate 26/min, and oxygen saturation 96% on a 15 L/min non-rebreather mask. Which of the following is the most appropriate immediate next step in the management of this patient?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Endotracheal intubation

Answer

Endotracheal intubation is the immediate priority due to signs of severe thermal inhalation injury and impending airway compromise.
The correct action is immediate endotracheal intubation. This patient presents with multiple indicators of severe thermal inhalation injury: closed-space fire exposure, hoarseness, singed nasal hairs, and carbonaceous sputum. The intense heat from inhaled smoke causes significant mucosal damage and rapid, progressive edema of the upper airway. If intubation is delayed, the swelling can completely obliterate the vocal cords and surrounding anatomy, transforming a standard intubation into a 'can't intubate, can't ventilate' emergency requiring a surgical airway. Therefore, the immediate next best step in initial stabilization is to secure the airway.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Assess the clinical presentation and vital signs.
The patient was in a closed-space fire and presents with hoarseness, carbonaceous sputum, singed nasal hairs, and oropharyngeal soot.
These findings are classic 'hard signs' of upper airway thermal injury and smoke inhalation.
2
Determine the highest priority in the stabilization algorithm (ABCs).
Airway (A) takes precedence over Circulation (C) and specific diagnostic workups.
Thermal injury to the upper airway causes progressive, rapid edema. If left unmanaged, the airway can completely occlude, making later intubation anatomically impossible.
3
Select the most appropriate intervention for the identified priority.
Early, elective endotracheal intubation is chosen.
Securing the airway before massive edema sets in is the most critical life-saving step in this clinical scenario.

Key Concept

Patients with signs of thermal inhalation injury (e.g., hoarseness, singed facial hair, carbonaceous sputum, closed-space fire exposure) require early and definitive airway management via endotracheal intubation before progressive edema obstructs the airway.
Question 4247Question →

A 68-year-old man comes to the outpatient clinic for a follow-up examination regarding his heart failure. He was diagnosed with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) six months ago. An echocardiogram at that time showed a left ventricular ejection fraction of 25%25\%. His past medical history is significant for hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and severe bilateral renal artery stenosis that was diagnosed via magnetic resonance angiography two years ago. His current medications include carvedilol, furosemide, and atorvastatin. The patient reports stable dyspnea on exertion but denies orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, or recent weight gain. Vital signs include a blood pressure of 142/86 mmHg142/86 \text{ mmHg} and a regular heart rate of 62 /min62 \text{ /min}. Physical examination reveals a jugular venous pressure of 6 cm H2O6 \text{ cm H}_2\text{O}. The lungs are clear to auscultation bilaterally, and there is no lower extremity edema. Laboratory studies show:

Serum sodium: 138 mEq/L138 \text{ mEq/L}
Serum potassium: 5.6 mEq/L5.6 \text{ mEq/L}
Blood urea nitrogen: 34 mg/dL34 \text{ mg/dL}
Serum creatinine: 2.2 mg/dL2.2 \text{ mg/dL}

Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in pharmacologic management to reduce this patient's long-term mortality?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Initiate hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate

Answer

The most appropriate next step is to initiate hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate.
The core goal in managing HFrEF is to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy to improve symptoms and reduce mortality. Standard mortality-reducing therapy includes a beta-blocker, a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (ACE inhibitor, ARB, or ARNI), and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). However, this patient has severe bilateral renal artery stenosis, which is an absolute contraindication to ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and ARNIs due to the risk of precipitating acute renal failure. Furthermore, his serum potassium is elevated (5.6 mEq/L5.6 \text{ mEq/L}) and he has significant chronic kidney disease, which contraindicates the use of an MRA like spironolactone. In patients with HFrEF who cannot tolerate standard renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition due to renal dysfunction, hyperkalemia, or bilateral renal artery stenosis, the combination of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate is indicated. This combination provides both arterial and venous vasodilation and has been shown to reduce mortality in this specific population.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the patient's primary condition and the clinical goal.
The patient has NYHA class III HFrEF (LVEF 25%25\%) and needs an additional medication to reduce long-term mortality.
Standard of care requires optimizing guideline-directed medical therapy to improve survival.
2
Evaluate standard first-line mortality-reducing options against the patient's comorbidities.
ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and ARNIs are contraindicated due to bilateral renal artery stenosis. MRAs (e.g., spironolactone) are contraindicated due to baseline hyperkalemia (5.6 mEq/L5.6 \text{ mEq/L}) and renal impairment.
Bilateral renal artery stenosis relies on angiotensin II for glomerular perfusion, and MRAs will exacerbate life-threatening hyperkalemia.
3
Determine the alternative pharmacologic intervention for mortality reduction in this specific clinical scenario.
The combination of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate is the correct choice.
This combination is proven to reduce mortality in HFrEF patients who cannot tolerate RAAS inhibition due to renal dysfunction or hyperkalemia.

Key Concept

In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who cannot tolerate standard renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors due to contraindications such as bilateral renal artery stenosis or severe hyperkalemia, the combination of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate is indicated to reduce mortality.
Question 4248Question →

A 3434-year-old man is brought to the emergency department via ambulance after being struck by a high-speed vehicle as a pedestrian. On arrival, he is confused and visibly diaphoretic. His blood pressure is 72/40 mmHg72/40 \text{ mmHg}, heart rate is 142 /min142 \text{ /min}, and respiratory rate is 28 /min28 \text{ /min}. Pulse oximetry shows 94%94\% on a non-rebreather mask. The airway is patent, and breath sounds are equal bilaterally. The abdomen is tense and distended. Physical examination reveals an unstable pelvic ring upon gentle medial compression of the iliac crests. Two large-bore peripheral intravenous lines are established, and balanced blood product resuscitation is initiated.

Arrange the following procedural and diagnostic steps in the most appropriate chronological sequence for managing this patient's condition:

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence is: Application of a pelvic binder, followed by a FAST examination, then emergent exploratory laparotomy, and finally pelvic angiography.
The algorithm for a hemodynamically unstable patient with an unstable pelvic fracture requires immediate application of a pelvic binder to reduce pelvic volume and control venous bleeding (which accounts for most pelvic hemorrhage). Concurrently, a FAST exam is performed to assess for intraperitoneal bleeding. A patient with a tense, distended abdomen and shock will likely have a positive FAST, necessitating an emergent exploratory laparotomy to control intra-abdominal solid organ or mesenteric bleeding. Because laparotomy does not adequately address bleeding within the deep pelvic retroperitoneum, pelvic angiography with embolization is the definitive subsequent step for persistent instability due to arterial injury.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Stabilize the pelvic ring mechanically.
Application of a noninvasive circumferential pelvic binder.
Reduces pelvic volume and tamponades venous bleeding from the presacral plexus, which is the most common source of hemorrhage in pelvic fractures.
2
Evaluate for coexisting intraperitoneal hemorrhage.
Performance of a focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST).
Crucial to determine if the patient's profound shock is driven by intra-abdominal bleeding, which dictates the surgical approach.
3
Control intraperitoneal hemorrhage surgically.
Emergent exploratory laparotomy.
A positive FAST in a hemodynamically unstable patient requires immediate operative intervention to stop active intra-abdominal bleeding.
4
Address residual retroperitoneal arterial hemorrhage.
Pelvic angiography with potential arterial embolization.
Used after laparotomy if the patient remains unstable or if an expanding pelvic hematoma is identified during surgery, to control arterial bleeding.

Key Concept

In hemodynamically unstable patients with major pelvic fractures, the sequence of management prioritizes immediate mechanical stabilization (pelvic binder), rapid exclusion of intra-abdominal hemorrhage (FAST), surgical control of intraperitoneal bleeding (laparotomy), and subsequent control of retroperitoneal arterial bleeding (angiography).
Question 4249Question →

A 5252-year-old man is evaluated in the hospital for worsening abdominal pain and new-onset fever. He was admitted 33 days ago for acute pancreatitis secondary to gallstones. Initial management with aggressive intravenous hydration and analgesics led to transient improvement. Today, his temperature is 39.2∘C39.2^{\circ}\text{C} (102.6∘F102.6^{\circ}\text{F}), blood pressure is 110/70 mmHg110/70\text{ mmHg}, pulse is 115/min115\text{/min}, and respiratory rate is 20/min20\text{/min}. Physical examination reveals severe tenderness in the epigastrium with guarding. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen is obtained. The images demonstrate an acute, heterogeneous collection of fluid and necrotic tissue involving the pancreatic body and tail, with multiple small foci of gas noted entirely within the collection. No well-defined capsule is visualized. Which of the following is the most accurate interpretation of these radiologic findings?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Infected acute necrotic collection

Answer

Infected acute necrotic collection
The correct answer accurately synthesizes the temporal course and imaging findings. According to the revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis, an acute necrotic collection occurs within the first 44 weeks and contains both fluid and necrotic solid debris without a well-defined wall. The presence of gas within this collection on CT is a pathognomonic radiologic sign of infection by gas-forming organisms, leading to the definitive diagnosis of an infected acute necrotic collection. This directly correlates with the patient's new-onset fever and clinical deterioration.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the temporal course of the patient's acute pancreatitis.
The patient is 33 days into the illness, which restricts the differential diagnosis to acute-phase complications (less than 44 weeks duration).
Pancreatic collections are strictly classified by their age under the revised Atlanta classification.
2
Evaluate the specific composition and morphology of the lesion on the CT scan.
The collection is heterogeneous (tissue and fluid) and lacks a capsule.
This differentiates an acute necrotic collection from a simple fluid collection (homogeneous fluid) or a late complication (encapsulated).
3
Interpret the presence of gas within the collection.
Gas within the necrotic tissue signifies the presence of gas-forming bacteria.
This radiologic finding is highly specific for infection, explaining the patient's clinical deterioration and fever.

Key Concept

Interpretation of CT imaging in acute pancreatitis (Atlanta classification), specifically identifying infected necrosis.
Question 4250Question →

A 4545-year-old male is evaluated in the surgical intensive care unit due to worsening respiratory mechanics and hemodynamic instability. He was admitted yesterday after sustaining major trauma in a motor vehicle collision, which necessitated an emergent damage-control laparotomy with perihepatic packing for a severe liver laceration. A temporary abdominal closure device was placed at the conclusion of the surgery. Over the past two hours, the patient's urine output has decreased to 1515 mL/hour. Current vital signs show a temperature of 37.2∘C37.2^\circ\text{C} (99.0∘F99.0^\circ\text{F}), blood pressure of 80/4880/48 mm Hg, and a heart rate of 132132/min. The mechanical ventilator is alarming frequently for high peak inspiratory pressures. Physical examination reveals an extremely tense and distended abdomen. Bladder pressure measurement reveals an intra-abdominal pressure of 2929 mm Hg. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in the management of this patient?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Bedside release of the temporary abdominal closure device

Answer

Bedside release of the temporary abdominal closure device
The correct intervention is immediate bedside decompression. This patient is exhibiting classic signs of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), characterized by an intra-abdominal pressure greater than 2020 mm Hg paired with new organ dysfunction (e.g., oliguria, hypotension, and elevated peak inspiratory airway pressures). The severe intra-abdominal hypertension causes upward displacement of the diaphragm, which increases intrathoracic pressure, and compresses the inferior vena cava and renal veins, rapidly decreasing cardiac output and glomerular filtration. Because this patient is already hemodynamically unstable and possesses a temporary abdominal closure from a prior damage-control laparotomy, the most rapid and appropriate life-saving maneuver is to release the closure device directly at the bedside. This allows the viscera to expand instantly, restoring organ perfusion and venous return without the lethal risks of transporting the patient.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary clinical syndrome based on the patient's vital signs, physical examination, and objective measurements.
The patient exhibits a tense abdomen, elevated peak airway pressures, new-onset oliguria, and hypotension, accompanied by a bladder pressure of 2929 mm Hg. This confirms the diagnosis of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS).
ACS is defined clinically as an intra-abdominal pressure greater than 2020 mm Hg associated with new organ dysfunction.
2
Determine the most appropriate immediate intervention for this life-threatening condition.
Surgical decompression of the abdomen is the definitive, life-saving treatment and must be performed immediately.
Relieving the intra-abdominal pressure restores venous return, improves cardiac output, and reduces mechanical pressure on the diaphragm and renal veins.
3
Select the correct procedural setting and sequence for a hemodynamically unstable patient with an existing temporary abdominal closure.
Bedside release of the temporary closure device is the fastest and safest approach.
Transporting an unstable patient with ACS to the operating room or radiology suite risks severe deterioration or cardiac arrest.

Key Concept

Patients with abdominal compartment syndrome (intra-abdominal pressure > 2020 mm Hg with organ dysfunction) require immediate surgical decompression, which can often be initiated safely at the bedside if a temporary closure device is already in place.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 4251Question →

A 46-year-old male patient presents to the internal medicine clinic due to poorly controlled hypertension. His current medication regimen consists of maximally tolerated doses of amlodipine, olmesartan, and chlorthalidone. Today, his resting blood pressure is 168/94 mm Hg. Physical examination is unremarkable with no abdominal bruits, edema, or cushingoid features. Laboratory studies reveal a serum potassium level of 2.8 mEq/L and a serum bicarbonate level of 30 mEq/L. Given the presence of severe hypertension and spontaneous hypokalemia, there is strong suspicion for a specific secondary etiology. The patient's antihypertensive regimen is transitioned to doxazosin and verapamil for several weeks to prevent assay interference, and a stepwise diagnostic evaluation is planned. Arrange the following diagnostic studies in the most appropriate, guideline-directed sequence to evaluate this patient's condition, from the initial diagnostic step to definitive pre-surgical planning.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence of evaluation is: (1) Measure plasma aldosterone concentration and plasma renin activity, (2) Perform an intravenous saline infusion test, (3) Obtain a high-resolution CT scan of the adrenal glands, and (4) Perform adrenal venous sampling.
The diagnostic workup for primary hyperaldosteronism must proceed in a deliberate, stepwise manner to avoid misdiagnosis. First, screening is initiated using the plasma aldosterone concentration to plasma renin activity ratio. Second, if the screening is positive, the diagnosis must be definitively confirmed by demonstrating autonomous aldosterone secretion that fails to suppress with volume expansion (e.g., via an intravenous saline infusion test). Third, once the biochemical diagnosis is secure, a dedicated adrenal CT is obtained to evaluate for adrenocortical carcinoma and provide anatomic guidance. Finally, because nonfunctioning incidentalomas are highly prevalent (especially in patients >35 years of age), adrenal venous sampling is essential to functionally confirm that the aldosterone hypersecretion is unilateral before proceeding to surgical adrenalectomy.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Perform initial biochemical screening.
Measurement of plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and plasma renin activity (PRA).
Initial screening is required before any confirmatory or imaging tests in patients with resistant hypertension and spontaneous hypokalemia to look for primary hyperaldosteronism.
2
Confirm the diagnosis biochemically.
Intravenous saline infusion test (or oral sodium load).
An elevated PAC/PRA ratio is suggestive but not definitively diagnostic. Demonstration of a lack of aldosterone suppression following a sodium load formally confirms the disease.
3
Perform anatomic localization.
High-resolution adrenal CT scan.
Imaging is necessary to identify macroscopic adenomas, rule out adrenal carcinoma, and determine the adrenal venous anatomy prior to further invasive testing.
4
Determine functional lateralization.
Adrenal venous sampling.
Imaging alone cannot reliably distinguish a functioning unilateral adenoma from bilateral hyperplasia with an incidental nonfunctioning adenoma. Adrenal venous sampling is required in almost all patients >35 years old to confirm lateralization before surgery.

Key Concept

The diagnostic evaluation of primary hyperaldosteronism follows a strict tier: initial biochemical screening, formal biochemical confirmation, anatomical localization via imaging, and functional lateralization via venous sampling prior to surgical intervention.
Question 4252Question →

A 2222-year-old male is transported to the trauma center by police officers following a physical altercation. He sustained a stab wound to the left anterior neck. On arrival, the patient is highly agitated and holding a blood-soaked garment to his neck. Blood is actively oozing from the wound site. His voice is noticeably hoarse, and he is coughing up bright red blood. Vital signs reveal a temperature of 37.2∘C37.2^\circ\text{C} (99.0∘F99.0^\circ\text{F}), blood pressure of 105/65 mmHg105/65\text{ mmHg}, pulse of 118/min118/\text{min}, and respiratory rate of 28/min28/\text{min}. Oxygen saturation is 89%89\% on room air. Physical examination demonstrates an expanding, pulsatile hematoma on the left side of the neck and audible biphasic stridor. Which of the following is the most appropriate immediate next step in the management of this patient?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Establishment of a definitive airway via direct laryngoscopy

Answer

Establishment of a definitive airway via direct laryngoscopy is the correct next step.
The correct action is to establish a definitive airway. This patient presents with penetrating neck trauma and classical 'hard signs' of severe aerodigestive and vascular injury, specifically an expanding pulsatile hematoma, hemoptysis, hoarseness, and stridor. These signs indicate impending airway loss. According to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) principles, securing a definitive airway is the highest priority (Airway always precedes Breathing and Circulation) and must be accomplished before any further diagnostic testing, imaging, or movement of the patient.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the primary survey (ABCs) in a patient with penetrating neck trauma.
The patient has stridor, hemoptysis, hoarseness, and an expanding hematoma, all of which compromise the airway.
Identifying immediate life threats determines the priority of interventions.
2
Determine the highest priority intervention.
Airway (A) takes precedence over Circulation (C) and all diagnostic modalities.
An unsecured, compromised airway can rapidly progress to complete obstruction and death, particularly if the patient is moved or laid flat for other procedures.

Key Concept

In penetrating neck trauma, the presence of 'hard signs' such as an expanding hematoma, stridor, or hemoptysis mandates immediate establishment of a definitive airway before any other diagnostic or therapeutic interventions.
Question 4253Question →

A 7272-year-old man is brought to the emergency department from a skilled nursing facility due to altered mental status, fever, and purulent sputum production over the past 2424 hours. His medical history is significant for severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type 22 diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease stage 33. Three weeks ago, he was treated with a 1010-day course of oral levofloxacin for a COPD exacerbation.

On arrival, his temperature is 39.1∘C39.1^\circ\text{C} (102.4∘F102.4^\circ\text{F}), blood pressure is 82/50 mm Hg82/50\text{ mm Hg}, pulse is 122/min122/\text{min}, and respirations are 28/min28/\text{min}. Oxygen saturation is 86%86\% on room air.

Physical examination reveals coarse crackles in the right lung base and decreased breath sounds globally.

Laboratory studies show a leukocyte count of 18,500/mm318,500/\text{mm}^3 with 15%15\% bands, blood urea nitrogen of 42 mg/dL42\text{ mg/dL}, and a serum creatinine of 2.1 mg/dL2.1\text{ mg/dL} (baseline 1.4 mg/dL1.4\text{ mg/dL}).

Chest radiograph demonstrates a dense consolidation in the right lower lobe.

After securing the airway and administering a rapid intravenous fluid bolus, vasopressor therapy is initiated.

Which of the following antimicrobial agents should be included in this patient's empiric regimen? (Select all that apply)

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Vancomycin; Cefepime

Answer

The correct agents to include are Vancomycin and Cefepime.
The patient presents with septic shock secondary to pneumonia. Because he resides in a skilled nursing facility and received a broad-spectrum antibiotic (levofloxacin) within the past 90 days, he is at exceptionally high risk for infection with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Current infectious disease guidelines mandate that critically ill patients with these risk factors receive aggressive, broad-spectrum empiric therapy covering both pathogens. Vancomycin provides the necessary MRSA coverage, while cefepime, a fourth-generation cephalosporin, provides excellent antipseudomonal coverage. Together, these two agents form a robust empiric regimen while pending culture and susceptibility data.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Assess the clinical severity and establish the primary diagnosis.
The patient is presenting with healthcare-associated pneumonia complicated by septic shock, as evidenced by his source of infection, hypotension, and requirement for vasopressor support.
Identifying the severity of illness dictates the urgency, route, and necessary breadth of empiric antimicrobial therapy.
2
Identify patient-specific risk factors for multidrug-resistant organisms.
The patient resides in a skilled nursing facility and received a course of a broad-spectrum antibiotic (levofloxacin) just 3 weeks ago.
Recent systemic antibiotic use (within the past 90 days) is the most significant predictor for infection with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
3
Select appropriate empiric antimicrobial agents targeting the suspected resistant pathogens.
The regimen must include an anti-MRSA agent (vancomycin) and an antipseudomonal beta-lactam (cefepime).
Inadequate empiric coverage for MRSA or Pseudomonas in a critically ill patient with septic shock dramatically increases morbidity and mortality.
4
Exclude contraindicated or inappropriate antibiotics from the potential choices.
Daptomycin is excluded due to pulmonary surfactant inactivation. Ceftriaxone is excluded because it lacks pseudomonal coverage. Ciprofloxacin is excluded due to the high risk of resistance following recent levofloxacin use.
Ensures the selected regimen is both clinically safe and maximally effective based on pharmacodynamics and the patient's pharmacological history.

Key Concept

Empiric antimicrobial therapy for severe pneumonia with risk factors for multidrug-resistant organisms.
Question 4254Question →

Systemic vasculitides often present with overlapping constitutional and organ-specific symptoms, requiring careful differentiation. Match each patient's clinical presentation to the most appropriate formulated differential diagnosis.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

A 45-year-old man with persistent nasal crusting, a saddle-nose deformity, new-onset hemoptysis, and red blood cell casts on urinalysis.
A 50-year-old woman with worsening adult-onset asthma, transient pulmonary infiltrates, and severe shooting pain with a new asymmetric foot drop.
A 48-year-old man with recurrent fevers, livedo reticularis on his thighs, severe postprandial abdominal angina, and negative ANCA serologies.
A 62-year-old woman with chronic fatigue, palpable purpura on her lower extremities, sensory neuropathy, a positive rheumatoid factor, and a markedly decreased C4 level.
A 65-year-old man with a rapidly progressive decline in renal function, hemoptysis, MPO-ANCA positivity, and a lung biopsy showing alveolar capillaritis without granulomatous inflammation.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct pairings map specific constellations of organ involvement and lab findings to their respective vasculitis: the presentation with saddle-nose and RBC casts matches Granulomatosis with polyangiitis; asthma with foot drop matches Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis; abdominal angina with negative ANCA matches Polyarteritis nodosa; purpura with low C4 matches Mixed cryoglobulinemia; and non-granulomatous pulmonary-renal syndrome matches Microscopic polyangiitis.
Each diagnosis is formulated by synthesizing a unique constellation of clinical and serologic features. GPA is defined by upper airway granulomas; EGPA by atopy, asthma, and eosinophilia; PAN by medium-vessel ischemia with strict pulmonary sparing; Cryoglobulinemia by low C4 and RF positivity; and MPA by a non-granulomatous pulmonary-renal syndrome.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the specific pattern of organ involvement described in each vignette.
Organ patterns emerge: upper airway + pulmonary-renal, asthma + neuropathy, mesenteric ischemia + skin, purpura + neuropathy, and isolated pulmonary-renal without upper airway disease.
Systemic vasculitides have overlapping features (like neuropathy and rash), so identifying the unique combinations (e.g., asthma, mesenteric ischemia, upper airway destruction) is the first step in formulating the correct differential.
2
Correlate the clinical pattern with key laboratory and histopathologic findings.
The low C4 level and positive RF confirm cryoglobulinemia. The absence of granulomas distinguishes MPA from GPA. The negative ANCA supports PAN.
Serologic markers and biopsy characteristics are essential to finalize the differential diagnosis among phenotypically similar vasculitides.

Key Concept

Formulating an accurate differential diagnosis for systemic vasculitides requires synthesizing distinct clinical patterns (e.g., upper respiratory involvement, asthma, mesenteric ischemia) with specific immunologic markers (ANCA type, complement levels, rheumatoid factor).
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 4255Question →

A 35-year-old woman with a history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) presents to the emergency department complaining of a 2-hour history of sudden-onset, left-sided pleuritic chest pain and shortness of breath. Her temperature is 37.1°C (98.8°F), blood pressure is 118/76 mmHg, heart rate is 112/min, respiratory rate is 24/min, and oxygen saturation is 91% on room air. Physical examination is notable for clear lungs bilaterally, a normal cardiac rhythm with no murmurs, and mild, asymmetric edema with tenderness in her left calf.

Based on the clinical presentation, arrange the following differential diagnoses in order from the highest pre-test probability (most likely diagnosis) to the lowest pre-test probability (least likely diagnosis).

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence from highest to lowest pre-test probability is: Acute pulmonary embolism, Lupus pleuritis, Community-acquired pneumonia, Acute coronary syndrome, and Costochondritis.
Acute pulmonary embolism is placed first because it uniquely unifies the patient's chest pain, hypoxia, tachycardia, and calf swelling, especially given her underlying prothrombotic risk factor (SLE). Lupus pleuritis is placed second as it is a common complication of her primary disease, but it cannot explain the deep vein thrombosis symptoms. Community-acquired pneumonia and Acute coronary syndrome are placed third and fourth, respectively, as they lack core supporting features (e.g., fever, typical ischemic pain). Costochondritis is placed last because it is a benign condition that never produces hypoxemia or tachycardia.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the primary symptom cluster and vital sign abnormalities.
The patient has sudden-onset pleuritic chest pain, dyspnea, significant hypoxia (91%), tachycardia, and signs of a deep vein thrombosis.
Objective physiological derangements dictate the severity and guide the top differential.
2
Match the clinical picture to the most unifying diagnosis.
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) explains all findings, including the DVT symptoms, in a hypercoagulable patient.
The principle of diagnostic parsimony (Occam's razor) prioritizes the single etiology that explains both the respiratory collapse and the peripheral vascular findings.
3
Evaluate secondary diagnoses driven by the patient's underlying condition.
Lupus pleuritis is prioritized next.
Serositis is a hallmark of SLE, making it highly plausible for chest pain, though it lacks an explanation for the leg swelling.
4
Rank the remaining less likely etiologies based on missing clinical features.
Pneumonia lacks infectious signs, ACS lacks typical ischemic features, and costochondritis lacks any explanation for abnormal vitals.
Conditions are ranked lower when critical objective findings (like hypoxia or calf swelling) actively contradict their typical illness scripts.

Key Concept

Formulating a differential diagnosis requires synthesizing the entire clinical picture; the highest pre-test probability belongs to the condition that most completely explains both the subjective symptoms and objective findings (vital sign abnormalities, physical exam signs).
Question 4256Question →

A 45-year-old construction worker is brought to the emergency department after a trench collapsed, trapping his right lower extremity under heavy debris for 4 hours. On arrival, he is in significant distress due to excruciating pain in his right calf, which he describes as "10 out of 10." The pain is markedly exacerbated by passive dorsiflexion of his toes. Vital signs show a blood pressure of 135/85 mm Hg, heart rate of 110/min, and respiratory rate of 18/min. Physical examination reveals a tense, swollen right calf with tight, shiny overlying skin. Both dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulses are palpable and symmetric to the contralateral side. Capillary refill is 4 seconds in the right foot. A urinary catheter is placed, yielding dark reddish-brown urine. Direct manometry of the right anterior compartment demonstrates a pressure of 45 mm Hg. Based on these findings, which of the following interventions are indicated in the immediate management of this patient? (Select all that apply.)

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Urgent four-compartment fasciotomy of the right lower leg; Aggressive intravenous isotonic crystalloid resuscitation

Answer

The indicated immediate interventions are urgent four-compartment fasciotomy of the right lower leg and aggressive intravenous isotonic crystalloid resuscitation.
This patient has acute compartment syndrome (ACS), evidenced by severe pain out of proportion to the injury, pain on passive stretch, a tense compartment, and a measured compartment pressure of 45 mm Hg45 \text{ mm Hg} (an absolute pressure >30 mm Hg> 30 \text{ mm Hg} is diagnostic). The definitive and limb-saving treatment is an emergent four-compartment fasciotomy. Additionally, his prolonged entrapment and dark urine strongly suggest rhabdomyolysis (crush syndrome), which requires aggressive intravenous crystalloid resuscitation to maintain high urine output and prevent pigment-induced acute tubular necrosis.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Diagnose acute compartment syndrome based on clinical signs and direct measurement.
Patient has pain out of proportion, pain on passive stretch, and a compartment pressure of 45 mm Hg.
Absolute compartment pressures >30 mm Hg> 30 \text{ mm Hg} or a ΔP\Delta P (Diastolic BP - Compartment Pressure) <30 mm Hg< 30 \text{ mm Hg} confirm the diagnosis, mandating emergent four-compartment fasciotomy.
2
Identify concurrent systemic complications of the prolonged crush injury.
Patient was trapped for 4 hours and has dark reddish-brown urine, indicating rhabdomyolysis and myoglobinuria.
Crush syndrome requires aggressive intravenous isotonic crystalloid fluid resuscitation to maintain high urine output and flush myoglobin, preventing acute kidney injury.
3
Avoid contraindicated maneuvers that worsen ischemia or delay definitive care.
Do not elevate the limb above the heart, and do not delay surgery for vascular imaging.
Elevation decreases arterial perfusion pressure. The presence of palpable pulses and a diagnostic pressure reading means imaging is unnecessary and delays limb-saving surgery.

Key Concept

Diagnosis and management of acute compartment syndrome and concomitant crush syndrome
Question 4257Question →

A 74-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department by her family due to sudden, severe abdominal pain that began 8 hours ago. She has a history of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. She was previously taking apixaban but discontinued it one month ago after sustaining a traumatic subdural hematoma from a mechanical fall. On arrival, the patient is lethargic and moaning in pain. Her temperature is 38.3∘C38.3^\circ\text{C} (100.9∘F100.9^\circ\text{F}), blood pressure is 78/48 mmHg78/48 \text{ mmHg}, pulse is 132/min132/\text{min} and irregularly irregular, and respirations are 24/min24/\text{min}. Physical examination reveals a distended abdomen that is rigidly tense. There is diffuse rebound tenderness, involuntary guarding, and absent bowel sounds. Laboratory studies show a leukocyte count of 22,000/μL22,000/\mu\text{L} and a serum lactate of 7.8 mmol/L7.8 \text{ mmol/L}. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Immediate exploratory laparotomy

Answer

Immediate exploratory laparotomy
The patient's clinical presentation is highly suspicious for acute mesenteric ischemia secondary to a cardiogenic embolus. While patients with early ischemia typically present with abdominal pain out of proportion to physical exam findings, this patient's lethargy, profound hypotension, severe lactic acidosis, and generalized peritonitis indicate advanced transmural bowel necrosis. In the presence of an acute surgical abdomen (diffuse peritonitis) combined with hemodynamic instability, the most appropriate next step is immediate exploratory laparotomy. Prompt surgical intervention is required to resect infarcted bowel, restore mesenteric blood flow (e.g., open surgical embolectomy), and achieve source control. Delaying transport to the operating room for imaging or other procedures in this critical state significantly increases mortality.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary suspected pathology based on the clinical presentation.
The patient has sudden, severe abdominal pain, atrial fibrillation off anticoagulation, elevated lactate, and leukocytosis, which strongly suggests acute mesenteric ischemia caused by an arterial embolus.
Recognizing the underlying ischemic event is essential for guiding the urgency of the intervention.
2
Assess the patient's hemodynamic status and physical examination findings.
The patient is in shock (blood pressure 78/48 mmHg78/48 \text{ mmHg}, heart rate 132/min132/\text{min}) and has generalized peritonitis (rigidly tense abdomen, rebound tenderness, involuntary guarding).
The presence of peritonitis indicates that the bowel ischemia has progressed to transmural infarction and potential perforation.
3
Determine the optimal procedural intervention based on the severity of the findings.
The combination of hemodynamic instability and an acute surgical abdomen necessitates immediate exploratory laparotomy, bypassing further diagnostic imaging.
Definitive surgical source control (resection of necrotic bowel and restoration of perfusion) is the only life-saving measure at this advanced stage.

Key Concept

Surgical management of acute mesenteric ischemia
Question 4258Question →

Match each constellation of endocrinologic laboratory findings to the most likely diagnostic etiology in young adult patients presenting with resistant hypertension and unprovoked hypokalemia.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Elevated plasma aldosterone, suppressed plasma renin activity, PAC/PRA ratio >20> 20
Elevated plasma aldosterone, elevated plasma renin activity, PAC/PRA ratio <10< 10
Suppressed plasma aldosterone, suppressed plasma renin activity, minimal blood pressure response to spironolactone, responsive to amiloride
Suppressed plasma aldosterone, suppressed plasma renin activity, markedly elevated urinary free cortisol-to-cortisone ratio
Suppressed plasma aldosterone, suppressed plasma renin activity, elevated serum 1111-deoxycorticosterone, low serum DHEA-S

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The laboratory profiles correctly map to their etiologies based on the state of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and specific markers of adrenal steroidogenesis.
Each laboratory profile distinctly reflects a specific pathophysiological derangement in the RAAS axis or adrenal steroidogenesis that perfectly corresponds to its respective etiology.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and plasma renin activity (PRA) to categorize the hypertension into primary hyperaldosteronism, secondary hyperaldosteronism, or a non-aldosterone mineralocorticoid excess state.
Elevated PAC and PRA indicates secondary hyperaldosteronism; elevated PAC and low PRA indicates primary hyperaldosteronism; low PAC and low PRA indicates another mineralocorticoid source or an ENaC defect.
The RAAS axis dynamically responds to volume status and primary driver mutations, making it the essential first step in differentiating these etiologies.
2
For profiles with both suppressed PAC and PRA, analyze the additional metabolic and steroidogenic clues, such as the cortisol-to-cortisone ratio, 1111-deoxycorticosterone levels, or specific medication responses.
An elevated cortisol-to-cortisone ratio identifies 11β11\beta-HSD2 deficiency, elevated 1111-deoxycorticosterone with low androgens points to 17α17\alpha-hydroxylase deficiency, and an isolated ENaC defect identifies Liddle syndrome.
Because aldosterone is appropriately suppressed by the hypervolemic state, identifying the alternate mechanism of sodium retention is required to finalize the diagnosis.

Key Concept

Interpretation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and steroidogenic pathway laboratories in the differential diagnosis of mineralocorticoid hypertension and hypokalemia.

Alternative Method

A systematic algorithmic approach to laboratory evaluation involves calculating the PAC/PRA ratio first: if >20> 20, suspect primary aldosteronism; if <10< 10 with high renin, suspect a secondary cause; if both are suppressed, systematically measure serum 1111-deoxycorticosterone and the urinary free cortisol-to-cortisone ratio.
Estimated Time:2m 30s
Question 4259Question →

A 42-year-old woman is evaluated in the ambulatory clinic for an 8-month history of progressively worsening exertional dyspnea and fatigue. She has no prior medical conditions, takes no medications, and has never smoked. Vital signs include a blood pressure of 118/76 mmHg, heart rate of 88/min, and respiratory rate of 16/min. Pulse oximetry is 96% on room air.

Cardiovascular examination reveals a regular rate and rhythm, a prominently loud pulmonic component of the second heart sound, and a grade 2/6 holosystolic murmur at the left lower sternal border that increases in intensity with inspiration. The lungs are clear to auscultation bilaterally. There is no jugular venous distention or peripheral edema.

An electrocardiogram demonstrates right axis deviation and right ventricular hypertrophy. A transthoracic echocardiogram reveals an estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure of 62 mmHg, right ventricular enlargement, and normal left ventricular size and systolic function with no left-sided valvular abnormalities.

Subsequent pulmonary function testing, including spirometry and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), is within normal limits. High-resolution computed tomography of the chest reveals clear lung fields without interstitial lung disease or emphysema.

Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in the diagnostic workup of this patient's condition?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scan

Answer

Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scan
The correct answer is a ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scan. This patient has echocardiographic evidence of unexplained pulmonary hypertension (PH). The diagnostic workup for PH follows a strict sequence to categorize the disease into one of five World Health Organization (WHO) groups. Group 2 (left heart disease) and Group 3 (lung disease/hypoxia) are the most common causes and have been effectively ruled out in this patient by the normal left ventricular function on echocardiography, normal pulmonary function tests, and a normal high-resolution CT of the chest. The next mandatory step in the diagnostic sequence is to evaluate for Group 4 PH, which is chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). A V/Q scan is the guideline-recommended initial screening test of choice for CTEPH because it is significantly more sensitive than computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for detecting the distal, organized, and often subtle thromboembolic disease characteristic of chronic chronicity.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the patient's primary syndrome based on clinical and objective findings.
The patient has clinical and echocardiographic evidence of pulmonary hypertension without left-sided heart disease or parenchymal lung disease.
Establishing the presence of unexplained pulmonary hypertension dictates the subsequent specific diagnostic algorithmic sequence.
2
Determine which etiologic groups of pulmonary hypertension remain in the differential diagnosis.
Group 2 (left heart disease) and Group 3 (lung disease) have been ruled out. Group 4 (chronic thromboembolic disease) and Group 1 (pulmonary arterial hypertension) remain.
Systematically ruling out common causes prevents premature invasive testing and guides the selection of targeted non-invasive screening.
3
Select the appropriate next non-invasive screening test to differentiate between the remaining diagnostic possibilities.
A ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan is selected.
A V/Q scan is the strictly guideline-mandated screening test for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) because it is more sensitive than a CT pulmonary angiogram for chronic, distal thromboembolic disease.

Key Concept

The diagnostic workup for unexplained pulmonary hypertension requires a ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan to screen for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) prior to performing a diagnostic right heart catheterization.
Question 4260Question →

While conducting rounds in the intensive care unit, a physician is urgently called to the bedside of a 72-year-old man who suddenly developed aphasia and right-sided hemiparesis. The patient was admitted five days earlier for the management of a massive saddle pulmonary embolism and has been receiving a continuous intravenous infusion of unfractionated heparin since admission. His medical history includes hypertension, diet-controlled type 2 diabetes, and a mechanical mitral valve replacement performed four years ago.

Vital signs currently show a temperature of 39.4∘C39.4^\circ\text{C} (102.9∘F102.9^\circ\text{F}), blood pressure of 110/65 mmHg110/65\text{ mmHg}, heart rate of 118/min118/\text{min}, and respiratory rate of 22/min22/\text{min}. Physical examination is notable for a new grade 3/6 holosystolic murmur radiating to the axilla. Neurological assessment confirms global aphasia and dense right hemiplegia.

Immediate laboratory analysis reveals:
Leukocyte count: 19,500/mm319,500/\text{mm}^3
Hemoglobin: 10.4 g/dL10.4\text{ g/dL}
Platelet count: 42,000/mm342,000/\text{mm}^3 (baseline on admission was 215,000/mm3215,000/\text{mm}^3)
Serum creatinine: 2.1 mg/dL2.1\text{ mg/dL} (baseline 1.1 mg/dL1.1\text{ mg/dL})

An emergent non-contrast CT scan of the head reveals a large acute ischemic infarction in the left middle cerebral artery territory, complicated by scattered petechial hemorrhages. A subsequent bedside transthoracic echocardiogram demonstrates a 1.2 cm1.2\text{ cm} highly mobile vegetation attached to the mechanical mitral valve. Blood cultures have been obtained.

Which of the following pharmacologic interventions are appropriate in the immediate management of this patient? (Select all that apply)

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Discontinue the continuous unfractionated heparin infusion; Initiate empiric intravenous vancomycin and cefepime

Answer

The correct interventions are to discontinue the continuous unfractionated heparin infusion and initiate empiric intravenous vancomycin and cefepime.
This patient's presentation requires simultaneous management of two life-threatening complications: Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) and healthcare-associated infective endocarditis (IE) complicated by an acute ischemic stroke with hemorrhagic conversion. The >50%>50\% drop in platelets after 5 days of heparin, combined with a new thrombotic event (stroke), generates a high 4T score for HIT. Therefore, all heparin products must be discontinued immediately. Furthermore, the patient requires prompt empiric broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy covering MRSA and Pseudomonas (such as vancomycin and cefepime) due to the presence of a new mechanical valve vegetation, a new murmur, and fever indicating healthcare-associated IE.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the patient's acute neurological presentation and imaging findings in the context of a new cardiac murmur and fever.
The patient has suffered a large ischemic stroke with hemorrhagic conversion secondary to septic emboli from a new healthcare-associated infective endocarditis (IE).
Identifying IE as the stroke etiology and recognizing the hemorrhagic conversion establishes an absolute contraindication to both thrombolysis and systemic anticoagulation.
2
Analyze the new-onset severe thrombocytopenia in the context of recent medication exposure.
A platelet drop of greater than 50% occurring 5 days after initiating heparin therapy, combined with a new thrombotic event (stroke), indicates a high probability of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT).
Recognizing HIT is essential to dictate the immediate cessation of heparin products and to avoid harmful interventions such as platelet transfusions.
3
Select the appropriate immediate pharmacologic interventions based on the synthesized diagnoses.
Discontinuation of all heparin products and initiation of broad-spectrum empiric antibiotics (vancomycin and cefepime) are the only indicated actions.
Heparin must be stopped due to HIT. Healthcare-associated IE requires immediate broad-spectrum coverage against MRSA and Pseudomonas. Other typical interventions (argatroban, alteplase, platelets) are absolutely contraindicated due to the hemorrhagic stroke and the pathophysiology of HIT.

Key Concept

Immediate management of healthcare-associated infective endocarditis with septic emboli requires broad-spectrum antibiotics, while recognizing absolute contraindications to anticoagulation and thrombolysis in hemorrhagic stroke, and identifying Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) to safely halt heparin.
Estimated Time:2m 30s
PreviousPage 213 / 237Next
All practice questions — USMLE Step 3 | Examkin