Topic Development

357 soru

Soru 301Soru

Passage Excerpt:

For decades, early audio recordings captured on wax cylinders remained silent, too fragile to be played by traditional styluses without being destroyed. In response, physicists developed the IRENE system, which uses non-contact optical scanning to create digital images of the grooves. The system then uses software to reconstruct the audio from these images, allowing listeners to hear long-lost voices.

Question:

Given that all the choices are true, which choice most effectively emphasizes the extreme precision of the optical scanning technology described in the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: map the microscopic contours of the grooves with sub-micrometer accuracy

Cevap

map the microscopic contours of the grooves with sub-micrometer accuracy
The correct option most effectively emphasizes the extreme precision of the technology by using highly specific and detailed descriptors like 'microscopic contours' and 'sub-micrometer accuracy.'

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to find the choice that most effectively emphasizes the 'extreme precision' of the optical scanning technology.
Understanding the precise criteria of the prompt is essential for evaluating the rhetorical suitability of each option.
2
Evaluate each option for grammatical correctness.
The option beginning with 'record visual details' contains a comma splice and is grammatically incorrect; all other options are grammatically sound.
Eliminating grammatically incorrect options narrows the choices to those that are syntactically valid.
3
Compare the remaining grammatically correct options against the specified rhetorical goal.
The option beginning with 'map the microscopic contours' uses the terms 'microscopic contours' and 'sub-micrometer accuracy,' which explicitly convey high-precision measurements. The other grammatically correct options ('capture digital pictures' and 'take photos of') use general descriptions that do not highlight precision.
Selecting the option that best fulfills the specified rhetorical goal ensures the correct answer is determined.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 302Soru

Located deep inside a sandstone mountain on a remote Norwegian island, the Svalbard Global Seed Vault serves as a fail-safe backup for the world's crop biodiversity. The facility is built to withstand natural disasters and power failures, ensuring the safety of millions of seed samples. [1] Svalbard, an archipelago in the Arctic Ocean, is home to more polar bears than people. In the event of a global catastrophe, scientists could retrieve these genetic samples to restore vital crops. Consequently, the vault represents a critical insurance policy for global food security.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence from the paragraph. Should this sentence be deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Yes, because it introduces a detail about Svalbard's wildlife that is tangential to the paragraph's focus on the seed vault.

Cevap

Yes, because it introduces a detail about Svalbard's wildlife that is tangential to the paragraph's focus on the seed vault.
The option recommending deletion because it introduces a detail about Svalbard's wildlife is correct because the paragraph is specifically focused on the purpose, design, and function of the Svalbard Global Seed Vault. The underlined sentence discusses the archipelago's polar bear population, which is a tangential detail that interrupts the focus on crop preservation and agricultural security. Therefore, the sentence should be deleted.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the purpose, durability, and function of the Svalbard Global Seed Vault in safeguarding crop biodiversity.
Understanding the paragraph's topic is necessary to evaluate whether any single sentence contributes to that topic.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the underlined sentence to the paragraph's focus.
The underlined sentence discusses the relative population of polar bears to humans on Svalbard. This detail is about local wildlife and human geography, which does not relate to the agricultural function of the seed vault.
Determining relevance requires checking if the sentence supports the main idea or interrupts the flow with tangential information.
3
Determine whether the sentence should be kept or deleted, and select the correct justification.
Since the sentence is irrelevant, it should be deleted. The justification must highlight that the information is tangential to the main topic of the seed vault, making the option stating it is tangential the correct choice.
Both the decision (delete) and the reason (tangential detail) must align to form the correct answer.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Soru 303Soru

The following is a draft of an essay about the history of writing tools.

[1]
In the mid-sixteenth century, a massive storm in Borrowdale, England, uprooted several trees, revealing a dark, metallic substance beneath their roots. Local shepherds quickly found that this mineral, which they initially mistook for coal or lead, was excellent for marking their sheep. This substance was actually high-purity graphite, the only such deposit ever found in solid form. Although they did not yet realize it, the locals had uncovered the key ingredient for the modern pencil.

[2]
______[Blank]______. Before this discovery, writing required ink and quills, which were messy and slow, or lead rods, which left faint lines. The solid graphite from Borrowdale, however, could be easily cut into sticks and wrapped in string or wood. Suddenly, artists, merchants, and scholars had access to a portable, dry, and erasable writing tool that could keep pace with their thoughts.

Which of the following choices, if inserted in the blank, would best introduce the second paragraph by establishing its main focus?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The discovery in Borrowdale soon sparked a major technological shift in the production of writing instruments.

Cevap

The option stating that the discovery in Borrowdale soon sparked a major technological shift in the production of writing instruments is the correct answer because it is grammatically correct and establishes the paragraph's focus on the transition from traditional writing tools to graphite tools.
The correct option is grammatically correct and provides an effective introduction to the paragraph. It establishes the paragraph's main focus—the transition and technological shift in writing instruments—before the subsequent sentences compare quills, ink, and lead rods to the newly introduced graphite sticks.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the second paragraph to determine its primary focus.
The paragraph describes how writing tools evolved from messy, slow ink and quills to portable, dry graphite sticks.
Understanding the paragraph's topic is necessary to select an introductory sentence that establishes its focus.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness and thematic relevance.
The option mentioning the major technological shift in writing instruments is grammatically sound and introduces the topic of writing tools. The other options contain grammatical errors such as subject-verb agreement mismatch, a comma splice, or a sentence fragment.
An effective topic sentence must be both grammatically correct and logically connected to the supporting details of the paragraph.
3
Select the correct option based on the analysis.
The option introducing the technological shift in writing instruments is selected as the correct answer.
It successfully performs the rhetorical function of a topic sentence without introducing grammatical errors.

Anahtar Kavram

Establishing Paragraph Topic Sentences
Soru 304Soru

Passage Excerpt:

In the late nineteenth century, the high-wheel bicycle, or "penny-farthing," dominated the roads, but its massive front wheel made it notoriously unstable and dangerous to ride. When the "safety bicycle" was introduced in 1885 with two wheels of equal size and a chain-driven rear wheel, [underlined portion]. Today, millions of people worldwide rely on bicycles for daily commuting and recreation.

The writer wants to complete the sentence in a way that emphasizes the transition from the safety bicycle's initial reception as a niche novelty to its rapid, widespread adoption by the general public. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: it was initially dismissed as a mere novelty, yet it rapidly became the standard design that sparked a worldwide cycling boom.

Cevap

The correct option is the one stating that the bicycle was initially dismissed as a mere novelty, yet it rapidly became the standard design that sparked a worldwide cycling boom.
The correct option successfully fulfills the rhetorical goal by directly contrasting the bicycle's initial status as a 'mere novelty' with its eventual success in sparking a 'worldwide cycling boom.' Grammatically, it uses the coordinating conjunction 'yet' to connect the clauses properly within the complex sentence structure initiated by 'When.'

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt's rhetorical goal.
The goal is to find a phrasing that specifically highlights the transition from an initial reception as a niche novelty to rapid, widespread public adoption.
This establishes the benchmark against which all choices must be evaluated.
2
Evaluate the choices for rhetorical alignment.
Only the correct option explicitly mentions the initial status as a 'mere novelty' and the subsequent 'worldwide cycling boom'. The choices highlighting comfort features or safety improvements focus on different aspects entirely.
Eliminating options that do not meet the rhetorical goal narrows down the correct candidate.
3
Check the remaining options for grammatical correctness.
The option containing the conjunctive adverb 'however' joined by only commas creates an incorrect comma splice. The correct option uses 'yet' as a coordinating conjunction to join the clauses correctly.
ACT English requires both rhetorical alignment and strict grammatical correctness.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 305Soru

The following is an excerpt from a passage about Mesoamerican epigraphy.

[1]
__________________________________________________ For nearly a century, scholars believed that Mayan hieroglyphs were purely logographic or symbolic, representing whole ideas rather than individual sounds. This consensus was largely dominated by one prominent archaeologist, who insisted that the glyphs had no phonetic component. However, in the 1950s, a linguist proposed a radically different approach, suggesting that the writing system was actually logo-syllabic, combining word-signs and phonetic syllables.

[2]
This breakthrough came from analyzing surviving codices and comparing them to an alphabet recorded by a sixteenth-century bishop. The linguist realized that when native scribes wrote the Spanish letters, they wrote glyphs that matched the sounds of those letters. For example, the Spanish letter b is pronounced 'beh,' which corresponded to the Mayan glyph for the syllable be. By applying this phonetic key, scholars began reading actual Mayan words, paving the way for modern epigraphers to decode the majority of the surviving inscriptions.

Which choice best introduces the passage by establishing its main focus?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: For decades, the decipherment of the ancient Maya writing system was stalled by a fundamental misunderstanding of how the glyphs functioned.

Cevap

The option stating that the decipherment of the ancient Maya writing system was stalled by a fundamental misunderstanding of how the glyphs functioned.
The correct option successfully introduces the central topic of the passage, which is the history of deciphering Mayan hieroglyphs and the long-standing obstacles that delayed this process. Grammatically, it is a complete sentence that matches the academic tone of the excerpt.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Read the passage to identify the central focus and theme.
The passage describes the transition from the historical belief that Mayan glyphs were purely logographic to a phonetic, logo-syllabic understanding.
Understanding the passage's content is necessary to select an introductory sentence that establishes its main topic.
2
Evaluate the options for grammatical correctness and completeness.
Three options contain grammatical errors: one is a sentence fragment, one is a comma splice, and one has a subject-verb agreement error.
ACT English questions require sentences to be grammatically correct as well as rhetorically appropriate.
3
Choose the option that is grammatically correct and best introduces the passage's theme.
The option describing how the decipherment of Mayan glyphs was stalled due to a misunderstanding of how they functioned is correct and fitting.
It acts as a complete, grammatically sound sentence that sets up the historical context of the decipherment struggle described in the first paragraph.

Anahtar Kavram

Establishing Introductions and Thesis Statements
Soru 306Soru

A writer is editing a draft of an essay about deep-sea discoveries. The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the paragraph:

"Ichthyology is the branch of zoology that is devoted to the study of fish, including bony fish, cartilaginous fish, and jawless fish."

Here is the paragraph:

In 1938, museum curator Marjorie Courtenay-Latimer was invited to inspect an unusual fish caught off the coast of South Africa. She was astonished to see a five-foot-long creature with fleshy, limb-like lobed fins, unlike any modern fish she had ever encountered. Unable to identify the specimen, Courtenay-Latimer sent a description and sketch to J.L.B. Smith, a local chemistry professor and amateur ichthyologist. [Point of insertion] Smith immediately recognized the fish as a coelacanth, a species previously believed to have gone extinct 66 million years ago. The discovery of this "living fossil" sent shockwaves through the scientific community, forcing biologists to re-evaluate their understanding of vertebrate evolution.

Should the writer make this addition at the indicated [Point of insertion]?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No, because it interrupts the narrative flow of the paragraph by introducing a general definition that is not central to the story of the coelacanth's discovery.

Cevap

The correct decision is not to add the sentence because it interrupts the narrative flow of the paragraph by introducing a definition that is not central to the story of the coelacanth's discovery.
The correct option is the one stating that the addition should not be made because it interrupts the narrative flow with an unnecessary definition. The paragraph is focused on the chronological story of Marjorie Courtenay-Latimer discovering the coelacanth and sending it to J.L.B. Smith for identification. Adding a general definition of ichthyology digresses from this main focus and disrupts the flow of the narrative.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the narrative events surrounding the discovery of the coelacanth in 1938 and its identification by J.L.B. Smith.
Establishing the focus of the paragraph allows us to evaluate whether the proposed sentence contributes to or detracts from that focus.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence defines the word 'ichthyology'. While the paragraph mentions that Smith was an amateur ichthyologist, defining the field itself is an unnecessary digression from the historical narrative of the discovery.
Determining whether the detail serves the main topic helps identify if the sentence should be added.
3
Select the option that matches the decision (No) and the correct justification.
The correct choice must state that the sentence should not be added because it introduces a definition that is not central to the story and interrupts the narrative flow.
This eliminates the 'Yes' options and the 'No' option with the incorrect justification.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating the relevance of details to ensure paragraph unity and narrative flow.
Soru 307Soru

The following is an excerpt from a passage about a major zoological discovery.

[1]
In December 1938, Marjorie Courtenay-Latimer was working in South Africa. While inspecting the catch of a local fishing trawler, a strange, blue-finned fish caught her eye. It possessed unusual, fleshy lobed fins that resembled limbs—a primitive anatomical feature. This specimen was later identified as a coelacanth, a prehistoric fish thought to have gone extinct 66 million years ago. Its discovery revolutionized modern paleontology by proving that ancient lineages could survive virtually unchanged in the deep ocean.

Which choice most effectively introduces the topic of the passage and establishes its central focus?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The discovery of a living coelacanth in 1938 shocked the scientific world, redefining our understanding of evolutionary history.

Cevap

The choice that states 'The discovery of a living coelacanth in 1938 shocked the scientific world, redefining our understanding of evolutionary history.'
The correct choice effectively introduces the passage's primary topic (the coelacanth) and its significance (shocking the scientific world and redefining evolutionary history). It transitions smoothly into the subsequent sentences, which describe the details of the 1938 discovery.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the passage to identify the main topic and purpose.
The passage discusses the discovery of the coelacanth in 1938 and how this 'living fossil' changed the scientific understanding of evolutionary history.
An effective introduction must establish this specific focus rather than general biographical details.
2
Evaluate the original sentence and the alternative choices for relevance and focus.
The original sentence is too broad. The correct choice directly introduces the coelacanth and its evolutionary significance.
This matches the rhetorical goal of establishing the introduction and thesis statement.
3
Check the remaining options for grammatical correctness.
The option beginning with 'Because' is a fragment. The option using a semicolon after 'Although' incorrectly separates a dependent clause from an independent clause.
Grammatical errors make these choices automatically incorrect regardless of their content.

Anahtar Kavram

Establishing Introductions and Thesis Statements
Soru 308Soru

In 1945, self-taught engineer Percy Spencer was testing a magnetron—a vacuum tube that generates microwave radiation—for a radar system at the Raytheon Corporation. Standing in front of the active device, Spencer was startled to find that a chocolate bar in his pocket had completely melted. Intrigued, he placed corn kernels near the tube, only to watch them pop and scatter across the lab. [1] Realizing that low-density electromagnetic energy could cook food faster than conventional ovens, Spencer immediately began designing a metal box to concentrate the waves, paving the way for the modern microwave oven.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence at Point [1]:
'Popcorn had been a popular snack for thousands of years, dating back to ancient indigenous cultures in the Americas.'

Should the writer make this addition?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Spencer's discovery by introducing irrelevant historical details about popcorn.

Cevap

The writer should not make the addition because the proposed sentence interrupts the paragraph's focus on Spencer's discovery by introducing irrelevant historical details about popcorn.
The correct option states that the sentence should not be added because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Spencer's discovery by introducing irrelevant historical details about popcorn. The paragraph centers on the accidental discovery of microwave cooking and the development of the microwave oven; details about the ancient history of popcorn are irrelevant to this narrative.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the series of events leading to Percy Spencer's accidental discovery of microwave cooking and his subsequent invention of the microwave oven.
To determine if any proposed sentence is relevant, we must first establish what the paragraph is about.
2
Evaluate the content of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence discusses the ancient history of popcorn in the Americas.
This helps us see if the new information directly supports, develops, or elaborates on the paragraph's core topic.
3
Determine if the proposed sentence is relevant and choose the correct option.
The proposed sentence is irrelevant because the paragraph is about the modern invention of microwave cooking, not the general history of popcorn. Therefore, the sentence should not be added.
This leads us to the correct decision (No) and the correct logical reason (it interrupts the focus with irrelevant details).

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating the relevance of potential additions to a paragraph based on its primary focus.
Soru 309Soru

Passage Excerpt:

For years, scientists believed the ocean floor was a flat, featureless plain. In the 1950s, geologist Marie Tharp began analyzing echo-sounder profiles of the Atlantic Ocean, meticulously plotting depth measurements by hand. Her work revealed a massive, continuous underwater mountain range, now known as the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, which provided crucial evidence for the theory of continental drift. Although her male colleagues initially dismissed her findings as 'girl talk,' Tharp persisted in her research, [underlined portion].

The writer wants to add a phrase in the underlined portion that emphasizes the painstaking and time-consuming nature of Tharp's mapping process. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: spending years hand-drawing thousands of individual depth soundings onto large paper sheets.

Cevap

The correct choice is the option that describes spending years hand-drawing thousands of individual depth soundings onto large paper sheets, as it directly emphasizes the time-consuming and painstaking nature of the mapping process.
The phrase describing the hand-drawing of thousands of soundings over several years directly addresses the rhetorical goal by illustrating both the painstaking and time-consuming nature of the mapping process. The action of drawing by hand shows the meticulousness, and the mention of years highlights the duration of the effort.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to find a phrase that emphasizes both the painstaking (meticulous, detailed, difficult) and time-consuming (taking a long duration) nature of Marie Tharp's mapping process.
Understanding the exact rhetorical constraint is crucial for evaluating the options.
2
Evaluate the options for grammatical correctness and alignment with the rhetorical goal.
The option describing hand-drawing thousands of soundings over years is grammatically correct and directly shows the painstaking work and time spent. The options mentioning tectonic plates and awards are grammatically correct but focus on the wrong topic (impact and recognition). The option beginning with 'she worked late' contains a comma splice.
This narrows down the choices to the one that satisfies both grammar and the prompt's specific requirement.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Soru 310Soru

[1]
_____________________________. For decades, the vast wetlands were viewed as nothing more than a useless, disease-ridden swamp that hindered progress. Under the banner of development, developers and politicians sought to drain the land to build farms and cities. This widespread perception persisted until Marjory Stoneman Douglas published her seminal book, *The Everglades: River of Grass*, in 1947. Her writing completely redefined the region not as a stagnant marsh, but as a dynamic, free-flowing river crucial to Florida's ecological survival.

[2]
Douglas’s advocacy went far beyond the page. She founded the Friends of the Everglades, mobilizing citizens to fight against destructive projects such as a proposed jetport in the middle of the wetlands. Her efforts helped secure the preservation of the unique habitat, which is home to rare species like the Florida panther and the West Indian manatee. Today, her work remains a foundational pillar of modern wetland conservation.

The writer wants to begin the passage with a sentence that introduces the main topic and sets up the discussion of how public perception of the Everglades shifted. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Before the mid-twentieth century, the Florida Everglades were widely misunderstood and actively targeted for destruction.

Cevap

Before the mid-twentieth century, the Florida Everglades were widely misunderstood and actively targeted for destruction.
The statement about the historical misunderstanding and targeted destruction of the Everglades is correct because it is grammatically accurate and establishes the central focus of the passage, preparing the reader for the discussion of how public perception transitioned from seeing the area as a useless swamp to an ecosystem worth saving.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the passage to identify the central theme and the role of the introductory sentence.
The passage discusses the shift from viewing the Everglades as a useless swamp to recognizing its ecological importance, largely due to Marjory Stoneman Douglas's work.
This establishes that the correct introduction must set up the historical misunderstanding and targeted destruction of the wetlands.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
The choice about developers wanting to drain the Everglades contains a comma splice, and the choice mentioning early developers' efforts contains a subject-verb agreement error.
Eliminating grammatically incorrect options ensures the final answer is grammatically sound.
3
Assess the remaining grammatically correct choices for rhetorical relevance.
The choice about the geographical acreage is off-topic, while the choice regarding historical misunderstanding directly sets up the main theme of the passage.
The correct choice must satisfy the specific rhetorical goal stated in the prompt.

Anahtar Kavram

Establishing Introductions and Thesis Statements
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 311Soru

Passage Excerpt:
Before the invention of radar, Britain’s coastlines were guarded by acoustic mirrors: massive, curved concrete structures designed to reflect and concentrate sound waves. Operators sat in front of these dishes with stethoscopes, listening intently for the distant drone of enemy aircraft engines. [1]

Which choice most effectively emphasizes the acoustic mirrors' scale and visual dominance on the landscape?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: These towering concrete monoliths loomed over the flat coastal marshes, serving as imposing sentinels.

Cevap

These towering concrete monoliths loomed over the flat coastal marshes, serving as imposing sentinels.
The correct answer successfully uses descriptive imagery ('towering concrete monoliths loomed') and metaphors ('imposing sentinels') to capture the grand scale and visual presence of the acoustic mirrors against the flat coastal background, satisfying all aspects of the rhetorical goal while remaining grammatically correct.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to emphasize the scale and visual dominance of the acoustic mirrors on the landscape.
Understanding the precise criteria of the prompt is essential for selecting the correct choice.
2
Evaluate the grammar and punctuation of each option.
The option containing 'they loomed over the landscape' is a comma splice because it joins two independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction or semicolon. The other options are grammatically correct.
Any option containing grammatical errors must be eliminated first.
3
Assess the remaining grammatically correct options against the rhetorical goal.
The option mentioning 'thirty feet tall' is too plain. The option describing 'several different shapes' focuses on utility and design. Only the option describing 'towering concrete monoliths' that 'loomed' and served as 'imposing sentinels' directly conveys both scale and visual dominance.
The correct choice must satisfy both grammatical correctness and the specific rhetorical criteria.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Soru 312Soru

In 1856, eighteen-year-old chemist William Henry Perkin accidentally created mauveine, the world’s first synthetic aniline dye, while attempting to synthesize a treatment for malaria. Recognizing the commercial potential of the vibrant purple substance, Perkin quickly patented his process and established a factory to mass-produce the dye. Indigo, another highly valued natural dye, was later successfully synthesized by German chemist Adolf von Baeyer in 1883. Perkin’s inexpensive synthetic dye revolutionized the fashion industry, making the color purple—previously reserved only for royalty—widely accessible to the general public.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence from the passage. Should the writer make this deletion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Yes, because the sentence interrupts the paragraph's focus on Perkin's discovery of mauveine and its impact.

Cevap

Yes, because the sentence interrupts the paragraph's focus on Perkin's discovery of mauveine and its impact.
The correct choice is the option that recommends deleting the sentence because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Perkin's discovery of mauveine and its impact. The passage details Perkin's accidental synthesis of mauveine and how it popularized the color purple. The sentence about Adolf von Baeyer synthesizing indigo in 1883 is a tangential detail that disrupts the paragraph's focus on Perkin's mauveine.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine the main topic of the paragraph.
The paragraph centers on William Henry Perkin's accidental discovery of the purple dye mauveine and how it revolutionized the fashion industry by making the color accessible.
Establishing the main focus is necessary to evaluate whether other details are relevant to this focus.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the underlined sentence to the main topic.
The underlined sentence discusses Adolf von Baeyer's synthesis of indigo in 1883, which introduces a different chemist and a different dye.
This step helps identify if the sentence provides essential context or if it is a distraction.
3
Determine the correct deletion decision and the reasoning behind it.
Since the sentence shifts the focus away from Perkin and mauveine, it should be deleted. The correct option is the one stating that the deletion should occur because the sentence interrupts the focus on Perkin's discovery and its impact.
This step matches the analysis to the correct multiple-choice option.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Soru 313Soru

The following is an excerpt from a draft of an essay about New York City's postal history.

In the late 1890s, New York City struggled to manage its rapidly growing volume of mail, as horse-drawn wagons routinely became gridlocked in congested streets. To resolve this crisis, the post office installed a network of underground pneumatic tubes that propelled mail canisters beneath the city streets at speeds of up to thirty miles per hour. At its peak, this subterranean network moved millions of letters daily across Manhattan and Brooklyn.

[1] ___________________________________________________________________. In 1918, the federal government suspended funding for the pneumatic system in order to prioritize the war effort. Following the war, the postal service chose to invest in automobile trucks, which could carry larger volumes over greater distances, and by 1953, the last of the city's pneumatic mail tubes were permanently shut down.

Which choice most effectively introduces the second paragraph by establishing its main focus?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: However, the subterranean system's era of dominance proved to be relatively short-lived.

Cevap

The choice that begins with 'However, the subterranean system's era' is the correct answer because it is grammatically complete and establishes the transition to the paragraph's focus on the decline and eventual abandonment of the pneumatic tubes.
The correct choice is grammatically sound and introduces the paragraph's focus on the decline and eventual abandonment of the pneumatic tube system by using the transition word 'However' to contrast with the success described in the first paragraph.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the flow of the passage to identify the topic of the second paragraph.
The first paragraph describes the success of the pneumatic tube system, while the second paragraph describes its suspension, displacement by trucks, and eventual shutdown. The second paragraph's topic is the decline and demise of the system.
This helps determine what kind of introductory sentence is rhetorically appropriate.
2
Evaluate the grammatical correctness of each choice.
One choice is a sentence fragment; another misuses a semicolon to separate a dependent clause; a third introduces an illogical tense shift to the present. Only the transition sentence starting with 'However' is both grammatically correct and logically fitting.
To eliminate grammatically flawed choices and select the one that is correct in both grammar and context.

Anahtar Kavram

Establishing Introductions and Thesis Statements
Soru 314Soru

For decades, the scientific community believed the ocean floor was a flat, featureless plain. In the 1950s, geologist Marie Tharp sought to prove otherwise by meticulously plotting sonar data collected from research vessels. Working at her desk at Columbia University, Tharp transformed raw numbers into detailed draft maps, revealing a massive, continuous underwater mountain range known as the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. [1] Her colleague, Bruce Heezen, initially dismissed her discovery, but Tharp’s persistence eventually revolutionized the field of plate tectonics.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence at Point [1]:

'Sonar technology had originally been developed during World War I to detect enemy submarines.'

Should the writer make this addition?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Tharp's mapping work by introducing tangential details about the history of sonar.

Cevap

No, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Tharp's mapping work by introducing tangential details about the history of sonar.
The correct option is the one stating that the writer should not add the sentence because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Tharp's mapping work. The paragraph is tightly focused on Marie Tharp's scientific achievements and her discovery of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Introducing details about the military history of sonar technology shifts the focus away from Tharp and onto a separate historical topic, making the addition irrelevant.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph outlines geologist Marie Tharp's work plotting sonar data to map the ocean floor and her discovery of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.
Establishing the paragraph's core focus is necessary to evaluate the relevance of any proposed additions.
2
Analyze the content of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence introduces details about the military development of sonar during World War I.
This determines how the proposed sentence relates to the main theme of Tharp's oceanographic research.
3
Evaluate the relevance and decide whether to add or reject the sentence.
The sentence should not be added because it introduces tangential historical context that distracts from the narrative about Tharp.
This guides the selection of the correct option containing the right decision and rhetorical justification.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 315Soru

Passage Excerpt:

In 1938, Marjorie Courtenay-Latimer, a South African museum curator, was inspecting the catch of a local fishing trawler when she noticed an unusual blue fin. Under a heavy pile of sharks, she found a five-foot-long fish with shimmering blue scales and limb-like fins. [Underlined Portion] then contacted J.L.B. Smith, a local chemistry professor and amateur ichthyologist, to help identify it.

Which choice most effectively emphasizes the immediate, hands-on efforts Courtenay-Latimer made to save the specimen from deteriorating before it could be identified?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: She quickly wheeled the fish to the museum in a taxi and treated it with formalin, she

Cevap

The correct option is the one that states: 'She quickly wheeled the fish to the museum in a taxi and treated it with formalin, she'. This choice directly addresses the rhetorical goal of emphasizing immediate hands-on effort to preserve the specimen.
The correct choice successfully details immediate physical actions ('quickly wheeled the fish... in a taxi') and direct efforts to prevent decay ('treated it with formalin') while maintaining perfect grammar in the sentence.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The prompt requires a choice that emphasizes immediate, hands-on efforts to preserve the fish from decaying.
Understanding the precise criteria of the goal is essential to filtering out irrelevant details.
2
Evaluate each option against the rhetorical goal, ensuring it describes active physical preservation efforts.
The option beginning with 'She quickly wheeled' describes direct actions (wheeling the fish, taking a taxi) and preservation methods (formalin), whereas the other choices focus on her worries, her motives, or contain grammatical errors.
This filters the options to find the one that meets both the rhetorical objective and grammatical constraints.
3
Verify that the selected option is grammatically correct and fits seamlessly into the surrounding sentence context.
Inserting the correct choice forms a grammatically correct compound structure ending with 'she then contacted J.L.B. Smith.'
ACT English questions require that the correct rhetorical choice must also be grammatically correct.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 316Soru

Passage Excerpt:

In 1696, Henry Winstanley began constructing the first Eddystone Lighthouse on a notorious reef off the coast of Plymouth, England. The lighthouse was a wooden structure, highly ornate and adorned with carvings and a grand drawing room. [1] Winstanley was so confident in his design that he famously wished to be inside the lighthouse during "the greatest storm that ever was."

Which choice most effectively emphasizes the extreme vulnerability of the lighthouse's design and location to the harsh elements of the sea?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The wooden tower was anchored to a low-lying reef that was entirely submerged at high tide, leaving the structure exposed to the open ocean's brutal waves.

Cevap

The option describing the wooden tower anchored to a low-lying reef submerged at high tide, leaving the structure exposed to the open ocean's brutal waves.
The choice detailing the wooden tower anchored to a low-lying reef submerged at high tide is correct because it directly fulfills the rhetorical goal of highlighting the lighthouse's vulnerability due to its material (wood), location (submerged reef), and environmental forces (brutal waves).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt's rhetorical goal.
The goal is to find the choice that highlights the vulnerability of the lighthouse's design/material (wooden) and location (reef) to the sea's forces.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the choices.
2
Evaluate the choices against the rhetorical goal.
Only the option mentioning the wooden tower and the submerged reef directly addresses both physical vulnerability and environmental elements. The other choices discuss candles, construction duration, or Winstanley's finances.
This identifies the option that fulfills the rhetorical requirements.
3
Check the chosen option for grammatical correctness.
The correct option is grammatically sound, whereas the option mentioning the distance off the coast contains a comma splice.
ACT English questions require the correct choice to be both rhetorically appropriate and grammatically correct.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 317Soru

[1] In 132 CE, Chinese inventor Zhang Heng introduced the world's first seismoscope, a device designed to detect earthquakes from hundreds of miles away. [2] The vessel was cast in bronze and resembled a large urn, adorned with eight dragons pointing downwards. [3] Each dragon held a bronze ball in its mouth, positioned directly above a bronze toad with an open mouth waiting at the base. [4] When an earthquake occurred, a pendulum mechanism inside the urn would swing and release the ball from the dragon corresponding to the direction of the earthquake's epicenter. [5] Zhang Heng was also a talented astronomer and mathematician who made significant contributions to the calculation of π\pi. [6] When the ball fell into the toad's mouth, it produced a loud clang, alerting the imperial court to both the occurrence of a tremor and its direction.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the paragraph. Should this sentence be kept or deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Delete it, because it interrupts the detailed description of the seismoscope's appearance and function with unrelated information about Zhang Heng's other accomplishments.

Cevap

Delete the sentence because it interrupts the detailed description of the seismoscope's appearance and function with unrelated information about Zhang Heng's other accomplishments.
The correct choice identifies that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the detailed description of the seismoscope's appearance and function with unrelated information about Zhang Heng's other accomplishments. The paragraph focuses on how the seismoscope looked and functioned to detect earthquakes; details about Zhang Heng's achievements in astronomy and mathematics (specifically calculating π\pi) deviate from this central topic.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the appearance and physical mechanics of Zhang Heng's seismoscope (how it detects earthquakes, what it is made of, and how the parts interact).
Determining the paragraph's focus is essential for evaluating whether a sentence is relevant or tangential.
2
Analyze the content of the sentence being considered for deletion (Sentence 5).
Sentence 5 states: 'Zhang Heng was also a talented astronomer and mathematician who made significant contributions to the calculation of π\pi.' This introduces his achievements in other scientific fields.
We must compare the sentence's content with the paragraph's central focus to determine its relevance.
3
Evaluate the decision and choose the correct justification.
The sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the explanation of the seismoscope's mechanics with tangential biographical information. Therefore, the option recommending deletion for introducing unrelated achievements is correct.
Selecting the option that correctly identifies the need for deletion and provides the accurate rhetorical reason ensures paragraph unity.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Soru 318Soru

[1]
_____________________________. Benton MacKaye, a regional planner and forester, first proposed the trail in his 1921 article, 'An Appalachian Trail: A Project in Regional Planning.' He envisioned a continuous wilderness path that would serve as a refuge from the growing urbanization and industrialization of East Coast cities. MacKaye believed that city dwellers needed a place to escape the hectic pace of modern life, find spiritual renewal, and engage in outdoor recreation.

[2]
Over the next few decades, volunteers and outdoor clubs worked tirelessly to turn MacKaye's vision into a reality. They cleared paths, built shelters, and blazed trees with the trail's signature white markers. Today, the Appalachian Trail stretches over 2,000 miles from Georgia to Maine, attracting millions of hikers who seek to test their endurance against the rugged terrain.

Which choice most effectively introduces the main subject of the passage and establishes the focus of the first paragraph?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: In the early twentieth century, an ambitious proposal arose to construct a continuous footpath along the Appalachian Mountains.

Cevap

In the early twentieth century, an ambitious proposal arose to construct a continuous footpath along the Appalachian Mountains.
The correct option introducing the early twentieth-century proposal for a footpath along the Appalachian Mountains effectively sets the stage for the essay. It defines the main subject of the passage and smoothly transitions to the next sentence, which details Benton MacKaye's 1921 proposal.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine the rhetorical goal of the opening sentence.
The sentence must introduce the main subject of the entire passage (the Appalachian Trail) and establish a clear transition to the next sentence, which discusses Benton MacKaye's 1921 proposal.
An effective introduction sets the context and provides a smooth transition to subsequent details.
2
Analyze each option for grammatical correctness and relevance.
One option is a dependent clause fragment, another introduces a future tense shift, and another is a generic statement about hiking that lacks the specific subject.
Eliminating grammatically incorrect and off-topic options ensures the best rhetorical fit is chosen.
3
Select the option that is both grammatically correct and meets the rhetorical objective.
The option introducing the early twentieth-century proposal for a footpath fits perfectly.
It identifies the trail and sets up the historical context for MacKaye's 1921 article.

Anahtar Kavram

Establishing Introductions and Thesis Statements
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 319Soru

Passage Excerpt:

In the early 1900s, the construction of the Panama Canal required excavating millions of tons of earth through the Culebra Cut. Landslides were a constant hazard, repeatedly burying equipment and undoing months of progress. [1]

The writer wants to add a sentence at point [1] that emphasizes the immense scale of the excavation effort and the primary technology used to accomplish it. Which choice best fulfills this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: To move the mountain of rock, crews operated over one hundred steam shovels, which filled up to 160 traincars daily with dug-up earth.

Cevap

To move the mountain of rock, crews operated over one hundred steam shovels, which filled up to 160 traincars daily with dug-up earth.
The correct answer successfully fulfills the rhetorical goal by specifying the technology used (steam shovels) and presenting numbers that illustrate the massive scale of the work (over one hundred steam shovels and 160 traincars daily). It is also grammatically correct.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goals.
The target sentence must emphasize the immense scale of the excavation effort and identify the primary technology used.
Understanding the precise criteria of the rhetorical goal is necessary to filter out options that address unrelated themes.
2
Evaluate the choices to check if they meet both parts of the rhetorical goal.
The correct choice mentions the primary technology (steam shovels) and details that show scale (over one hundred shovels, 160 traincars daily). The options focusing on worker origins or construction delays fail to meet these criteria.
This step eliminates distractors that are topically related but fail to address the specific prompt requirements.
3
Check the remaining option for grammatical correctness.
The correct choice is grammatically sound, whereas the option mentioning crews working day and night contains a comma splice.
Ensuring the selected choice is free of grammatical errors completes the ACT English question requirements.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Soru 320Soru

The following is an excerpt from a draft of an essay about a pioneering scientific discovery.

[1] _____________________________. At the time, leprosy was a highly feared disease with no known cure, and patients in Hawaii were forcibly exiled to an isolated peninsula on the island of Molokai. The prevailing treatment, a natural oil, was thick and sticky, making it difficult to inject or absorb effectively. Alice Ball, a young chemist, successfully developed a process to isolate the active compounds from the oil. This breakthrough created the first effective, water-soluble treatment, allowing hundreds of exiled patients to return home to their families.

Which choice, if placed at [1], most effectively introduces the paragraph by establishing its main focus?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: In the early twentieth century, medical researchers struggled to find a workable treatment for leprosy.

Cevap

In the early twentieth century, medical researchers struggled to find a workable treatment for leprosy.
The sentence stating that medical researchers struggled to find a treatment for leprosy is grammatically correct and directly establishes the central topic of the paragraph. It provides a logical transition to the next sentence, which details the historical stigmatization and isolation of leprosy patients.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph by reading the sentences that follow the introduction.
The paragraph discusses the lack of a cure for leprosy, the limitations of the existing treatment (thick oil), and Alice Ball's development of the first effective, water-soluble treatment that allowed patients to return home.
Identifying the main focus ensures the introductory sentence establishes the correct thematic direction.
2
Evaluate the choices to determine which one grammatically and rhetorically introduces the topic of leprosy treatments.
The statement introducing the twentieth-century struggle for a leprosy treatment provides the necessary context and flows logically into the subsequent sentence about the lack of a cure.
An effective introduction must connect logically to the sentences that follow and introduce the central topic.
3
Identify and eliminate options that contain grammatical errors or fail to meet the rhetorical goal.
The dependent clause fragment, the comma splice, and the off-topic statement about chemistry students are eliminated.
An introductory sentence must be grammatically complete and directly relevant to the topic of the paragraph.

Anahtar Kavram

Establishing Introductions and Thesis Statements
ÖncekiSayfa 16 / 18Sonraki
Topic Development Alıştırma Soruları — ACT — Sayfa 16 | Examkin