Topic Development

357 soru

Soru 141Soru

Passage excerpt:

When the Paris Métro opened in 1900, the transit company sought to make the new underground railway inviting rather than intimidating. They commissioned architect Hector Guimard, whose modular cast-iron entryways came to define the city's aesthetic. Guimard’s designs utilized organic forms—such as arches resembling orchid stalks and glass canopies shaped like butterfly wings—to ease the public's transition from the familiar streets into the dark, subterranean platforms. By blending these natural motifs with structural metal, he created spaces that felt open and organic.

The writer wants to replace the bolded sentence with one that highlights how the physical architecture of the entrances specifically countered the public's fear of descending into a dark, subterranean space. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: These greenhouse-like structures bathed the stairwells in natural light, making the descent feel like entering a sunlit garden conservatory rather than descending into a tomb.

Cevap

The option describing how the greenhouse-like structures bathed the stairwells in natural light, making the descent feel like entering a sunlit garden conservatory rather than a tomb.
The correct choice successfully fulfills the rhetorical goal by highlighting the physical attributes of the design (greenhouse-like structures, natural light) and contrasting them directly with the fear of underground transit (descending into a tomb vs. entering a sunlit garden conservatory). It is also grammatically correct.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt's specific rhetorical goal.
The replacement sentence must show how the physical architecture of the entryways countered the fear of going underground.
Identifying the target criteria allows for the elimination of grammatically correct options that do not fit the prompt's purpose.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
Eliminated the option containing a comma splice (joining two independent clauses with a comma) and the option with an incorrect comma separating a noun from its restrictive clause.
ACT English questions require the correct answer to be both rhetorically appropriate and grammatically correct.
3
Compare the remaining grammatically correct options against the rhetorical goal.
The option focusing on iron fabrication and local assembly fails the rhetorical goal, leaving the option highlighting the transformation of the descent into a sunlit conservatory as the only correct choice.
The correct choice must explicitly contrast the scary aspect of the descent (descending into a tomb) with the light-filled, organic architecture (greenhouse-like structures, natural light).

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 142Soru

[1] In 1938, Ruth Wakefield, owner of the Toll House Inn in Massachusetts, made culinary history when she decided to chop up a bar of semi-sweet chocolate and add it to her cookie dough. [2] She had expected the chocolate chunks to melt and swirl into the dough, but they instead retained their shape, creating the first chocolate chip cookie. [3] Over the years, many bakers have experimented with other cookie recipes, such as oatmeal raisin and peanut butter. [4] The recipe became an instant sensation among her guests, prompting Nestlé to print the Toll House recipe on their chocolate wrappers in exchange for providing Wakefield with a lifetime supply of chocolate.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence [3] from the passage. Should Sentence [3] be kept or deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Deleted, because it introduces details about other cookie flavors that distract from the paragraph's focus on the creation of the chocolate chip cookie.

Cevap

Deleted, because it introduces details about other cookie flavors that distract from the paragraph's focus on the creation of the chocolate chip cookie.
The correct option is correct because the paragraph is strictly focused on the invention and success of the chocolate chip cookie. Sentence 3 introduces details about other cookie flavors (oatmeal raisin and peanut butter) and other bakers, which deviates from this specific topic and interrupts the flow of the passage.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes how Ruth Wakefield invented the chocolate chip cookie at her inn and its subsequent popularity.
Establishing the paragraph's main focus is essential for determining if individual sentences are relevant.
2
Analyze the purpose and content of Sentence 3.
Sentence 3 discusses other bakers experimenting with oatmeal raisin and peanut butter cookie recipes.
Evaluating the specific content of the sentence reveals whether it supports or departs from the main topic.
3
Decide whether the sentence should be kept or deleted, and select the correct rhetorical justification.
The sentence should be deleted because it introduces irrelevant information about other cookie flavors, which distracts from the narrative about the chocolate chip cookie.
Comparing the sentence content to the paragraph focus shows that it is an irrelevant distraction, which matches the option advising deletion due to distraction.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Soru 143Soru

Saving Sounds of the Past

[1]
For decades, archivists and historians struggled with a delicate problem: how to play the oldest recorded sounds in human history without destroying them. Early sound recordings from the late nineteenth century were captured on fragile materials like wax cylinders, tinfoil, and shellac discs. Every time a stylus was placed in the grooves of these media to play back the audio, the friction wore away a tiny bit of the soft material, slowly erasing the history it contained.

[2]
In the early 2000s, a breakthrough emerged from an unlikely place: particle physics. Physicist Carl Haber realized that the high-resolution optical cameras used to track subatomic particle collisions could be applied to audio preservation. By using these cameras to take thousands of micro-photographs of a record's surface, scientists could construct a detailed three-dimensional digital model of the groove.

[3]
Once the digital model is created, specialized software acts as a virtual stylus, calculating how a physical needle would move through the reconstructed grooves. This process, known as optical sound recovery, allows researchers to play back the audio without ever physically touching the delicate media. As a result, recordings that were previously considered unplayable due to damage or decay can now be heard clearly for the first time in over a century.

[4]
Through this technology, historians have recovered invaluable cultural artifacts. These include an 1885 recording of Alexander Graham Bell's voice and early traditional songs of Native American tribes. By bridging the gap between physics and history, optical recovery has ensured that these fragile auditory snapshots are preserved for future generations to study and appreciate.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that details the historical evolution of audio playback devices from the late nineteenth century to the mid-twentieth century. Would this essay fulfill that goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No, because the essay focuses on a specific modern technology used to preserve fragile historical recordings rather than tracing the developmental history of playback devices.

Cevap

No, because the essay focuses on a specific modern technology used to preserve fragile historical recordings rather than tracing the developmental history of playback devices.
The correct answer accurately evaluates that the essay fails to meet the hypothetical goal. The main purpose of the passage is to explain how a modern scientific breakthrough—optical sound recovery—is used to digitize and play fragile historical recordings safely. It does not provide a historical progression or trace the development of playback devices (such as phonographs, record players, or tape recorders) over the specified time period.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the hypothetical writing goal specified in the prompt.
The goal is to detail the historical evolution of audio playback devices from the late nineteenth century to the mid-twentieth century.
This establishes the benchmark against which the essay must be evaluated.
2
Analyze the main focus and actual content of the provided passage.
The passage describes how scientists use high-resolution optical cameras and software (optical sound recovery) to play and preserve fragile early recordings without touching them.
Understanding the actual topic of the passage allows you to determine if it aligns with the hypothetical goal.
3
Compare the actual focus of the passage with the hypothetical goal and choose the correct option.
Since the passage is about a modern preservation technique rather than the history of playback devices, the essay does not fulfill the goal. The correct option is the one stating that it does not fulfill the goal because it focuses on a specific modern technology rather than tracing device history.
This directly matches the actual purpose of the passage against the proposed goal.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Soru 144Soru

Sequoyah’s System

[1]
In the early nineteenth century, a Cherokee silversmith named Sequoyah became convinced that written language was the key to his people’s political and cultural survival. Watching European settlers communicate across great distances using what he termed "talking leaves"—written pages—Sequoyah resolved to create a writing system for the Cherokee language. Despite having no formal education and speaking no English, he began his work around 18091809.

[2]
Initially, Sequoyah attempted to create a unique pictographic symbol for every word in the Cherokee language. This approach quickly proved unmanageable, as he amassed thousands of drawings that were too complex for others to memorize. Realizing the limitation of this method, he shifted his strategy. Instead of representing whole words, he began listening to the individual sounds that made up Cherokee words, dividing the spoken language into distinct syllables.

[3]
By 18211821, Sequoyah had completed a syllabary consisting of 8686 characters, which represented all the vocal sounds of the Cherokee language. Some characters resembled English letters, Greek symbols, or Hebrew numerals, though he assigned them entirely different phonetic values. The system was remarkably intuitive; unlike English, which requires years to master, a Cherokee speaker could learn to read and write using Sequoyah’s syllabary in just a few weeks. Within a decade, the Cherokee Nation established a bilingual newspaper, the *Cherokee Phoenix*, and achieved a literacy rate higher than that of neighboring white settlers.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that documents the challenges and eventual success of creating a phonetic writing system for a previously unwritten Native American language. Would this essay fulfill that goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Yes, because the essay describes Sequoyah’s initial struggle with a pictographic system and his successful development of an intuitive phonetic syllabary that dramatically increased Cherokee literacy.

Cevap

The option stating that the essay successfully documents Sequoyah's initial pictographic struggle and the eventual development of a phonetic syllabary that improved literacy.
The correct option correctly identifies that the essay fulfills the goal. It describes both the initial obstacles Sequoyah faced (the failure of the pictographic system due to its complexity) and the final success (the creation of an 8686-character phonetic syllabary that achieved high literacy rates).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the writing goal stated in the prompt.
The goal is to document both the challenges and the eventual success of creating a phonetic writing system for a previously unwritten Native American language.
Establishing the precise criteria for success is necessary to evaluate the essay.
2
Evaluate the passage content against the challenge requirement.
The second paragraph details Sequoyah's initial failure with a pictographic system that was too complex to memorize.
This establishes that the essay documents the challenges faced during the creation process.
3
Evaluate the passage content against the success requirement.
The third paragraph describes the completion of the 8686-character syllabary and its highly successful adoption, which raised Cherokee literacy rates.
This establishes that the essay documents the eventual success of the project.
4
Verify if the language and system properties match the goal.
Cherokee is a Native American language that was previously unwritten, and a syllabary is a phonetic system based on vocal sounds.
This confirms that the subject matter matches the specific details of the goal.
5
Select the option that correctly answers 'Yes' and aligns with the findings.
The option asserting 'Yes' because of Sequoyah's pictographic struggles and phonetic success matches these points.
The correct answer must accurately reflect both the essay's direction and its actual content.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating whether an essay as a whole fulfills a specific, rhetorically defined goal.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 145Soru

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the passage (placed after Sentence 3):

"Darwin, in particular, was deeply concerned that Kelvin's timeline did not allow enough time for natural selection to produce the Earth's diverse life forms."

Should the writer make this addition?

[1] In the mid-nineteenth century, the physicist Lord Kelvin attempted to calculate the age of the Earth by measuring its geothermal heat loss. [2] Assuming the Earth began as a molten sphere and had been cooling steadily, Kelvin estimated its age to be between 20 and 400 million years. [3] While this calculation was far longer than the biblical timeline accepted by many at the time, it was hotly contested by geologists and biologists, who argued that evolutionary and geological processes required billions of years. [4] Kelvin's calculations, though mathematically rigorous, were ultimately flawed because he was unaware of radioactivity, which releases heat within the Earth's interior and delays cooling. [5] The discovery of radioactive decay by Henri Becquerel in 1896 eventually provided the key to accurately dating the planet at 4.5 billion years.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Yes, because it offers a specific, relevant example of a biologist whose theories were challenged by Kelvin’s timeline, supporting the general statement in Sentence 3.

Cevap

Yes, because it offers a specific, relevant example of a biologist whose theories were challenged by Kelvin’s timeline, supporting the general statement in Sentence 3.
The correct answer is the option indicating that the sentence should be added because it offers a specific, relevant example of a biologist whose theories were challenged by Kelvin’s timeline. Sentence 3 states that Kelvin's calculations were contested by biologists who argued that evolutionary processes required billions of years. The proposed sentence provides a concrete illustration of this point by naming Charles Darwin and his concern regarding the time needed for natural selection, thereby supporting the claim made in Sentence 3 and maintaining the paragraph's flow.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph outlines Lord Kelvin's attempt to calculate the age of the Earth, the opposition his timeline faced from other scientists (geologists and biologists), and how the discovery of radioactivity eventually resolved the debate.
Understanding the paragraph's main theme is essential to evaluate the relevance of any proposed addition.
2
Evaluate the content of the proposed sentence and its relationship to the surrounding sentences.
The proposed sentence states that Charles Darwin was concerned about Kelvin's timeline because it did not allow enough time for natural selection. This directly details the biological objections mentioned in Sentence 3.
This determines if the proposed sentence is relevant and where it logically fits in the narrative flow.
3
Evaluate the options to match the correct decision and justification.
Since the sentence is relevant and supports the previous sentence's general claim, it should be added. The option explaining that it offers a specific, relevant example of a biologist whose theories were challenged by the timeline is correct.
Only one option correctly identifies both the decision to add the sentence and the rhetorically sound justification for doing so.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Soru 146Soru

[1] Restoring centuries-old oil paintings requires removing layers of accumulated dirt and discolored varnish without damaging the delicate paint underneath. [2] Historically, conservators relied on chemical solvents, which were difficult to control and could permanently dissolve the original pigment. [3] Today, many restoration experts are turning to laser ablation, a technique that uses short pulses of light to vaporize surface grime. [4] This method is highly precise; by adjusting the laser's wavelength, conservators can target specific foreign substances while leaving the paint intact. [5] The chemical composition of historical oil paints varied significantly depending on the region and the decade in which the artist worked. [6] Consequently, this advanced technology allows masterpieces to be cleaned with unprecedented safety, preserving the artist's original vision.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the passage. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Delete, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the mechanics and safety of laser restoration technology.

Cevap

Delete, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the mechanics and safety of laser restoration technology.
The correct option is the one stating that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the mechanics and safety of laser restoration technology. The paragraph focuses on how restoration methods have evolved, specifically comparing the risks of chemical solvents with the benefits of laser ablation. Sentence 5, which discusses variations in paint composition, is a digression that interrupts the logical flow from Sentence 4 (the precision of the laser) to Sentence 6 (the conclusion that this technology allows for safer cleaning).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the primary focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph discusses the methods used to restore historical oil paintings, contrasting the lack of control associated with traditional chemical solvents (Sentence 2) with the precision and safety of modern laser ablation technology (Sentences 3, 4, and 6).
Establishing the main topic is necessary to evaluate if Sentence 5 is relevant or if it digresses from the main argument.
2
Examine the content of Sentence 5 and determine its relationship to the surrounding sentences.
Sentence 5 discusses how the chemical composition of oil paints varied by region and decade. While it contains related keywords (paint, artist), it does not explain how this variation affects laser restoration, nor does it support the argument about the safety and precision of the technology.
This helps identify whether Sentence 5 contributes to the logical development of the paragraph or acts as a distraction.
3
Evaluate the transition between Sentence 4 and Sentence 6 without Sentence 5.
Sentence 4 explains how adjusting the wavelength makes the laser precise, and Sentence 6 concludes that 'Consequently, this advanced technology allows masterpieces to be cleaned with unprecedented safety.' Sentence 6 directly follows the logic of Sentence 4. Inserting Sentence 5 between them disrupts this transition.
Confirming the flow demonstrates that deleting the sentence improves paragraph unity and cohesion.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Soru 147Soru

Clear Vision: Mary Anderson's Windshield Wiper

In the winter of 1902, Mary Anderson, a real estate developer and rancher from Alabama, visited New York City. While riding a streetcar on a snowy day, she observed that the motorman had to drive with the front window panes open, or periodically stop the streetcar to wipe snow and sleet off the windshield by hand. This not only delayed the journey but also exposed both the driver and the passengers to the freezing cold. Anderson immediately began sketching a solution.

Upon returning to Alabama, Anderson designed a manually operated device consisting of a lever inside the vehicle that controlled a rubber blade on the outside of the windshield. The lever allowed the driver to wipe the window without opening it. She was granted a patent for her invention in 1903, which she called a "window cleaning device." However, when she attempted to sell the rights to her invention to several manufacturing firms, including a prominent Canadian company, they rejected it, believing that the device had no commercial value and would distract drivers.

Anderson’s patent expired in 1920, just as the automotive industry began to boom. Shortly thereafter, Cadillac became the first car manufacturer to adopt the windshield wiper as standard equipment, based closely on Anderson's design. Although she never received financial compensation for her invention, Mary Anderson is now recognized as the visionary who made driving in inclement weather safe and practical.

***

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that chronicles how Mary Anderson's invention of the windshield wiper eventually brought her great wealth and commercial success during her lifetime. Is it true or false that the essay successfully fulfills this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

The statement is false.
The statement is false because the text explicitly states that manufacturing firms rejected Anderson's invention and that she never received financial compensation, directly contradicting the goal of chronicling her wealth and commercial success.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the hypothetical writing goal specified in the prompt.
The goal is to write an essay that chronicles how Mary Anderson's invention brought her great wealth and commercial success during her lifetime.
This establishes the criteria by which the essay must be evaluated.
2
Analyze the passage for details regarding Mary Anderson's financial compensation and commercial success.
The second paragraph notes that manufacturing companies rejected her invention, and the final paragraph states that she 'never received financial compensation for her invention' and that the patent expired in 1920 before adoption.
This determines whether the actual content matches the hypothetical goal.
3
Evaluate whether the goal is fulfilled based on the evidence.
Since she did not receive wealth or financial success from the invention, the essay fails to fulfill the hypothetical goal.
This determines the final true/false status of the statement.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Soru 148Soru

Passage Excerpt:

For centuries, scientists have marveled at the durability of ancient Roman concrete, which has survived for two millennia in harsh marine environments. Recently, researchers discovered that the Romans used a hot-mixing method, leaving small, white mineral fragments known as 'lime clasts' throughout the material. Previously, these lime clasts were once dismissed as a sign of poor mixing.

Prompt:

Given that all the choices are true, which choice most effectively highlights the active, self-healing role that lime clasts play in maintaining the structural integrity of Roman concrete over time?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: When tiny cracks form in the concrete, water enters and dissolves these lime clasts, which then recrystallize as calcium carbonate to plug the fissures.

Cevap

The choice describing water entering cracks, dissolving the lime clasts, and recrystallizing to plug the fissures.
The correct choice successfully describes the dynamic self-healing process—cracking, water entry, dissolution, and recrystallization to plug fissures—in a grammatically correct sentence, thereby directly fulfilling the rhetorical goal.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The target goal is to find a choice that specifically highlights the 'active, self-healing role' of lime clasts in maintaining structural integrity over time.
This establishes the main criteria for assessing the content of the answer options.
2
Check the answer options for grammatical errors.
The option stating that water enters the concrete when cracks form contains a comma splice because it joins two independent clauses without a proper coordinating conjunction or punctuation.
ACT English requires the correct answer to be free of grammatical errors.
3
Evaluate the remaining grammatically correct options against the rhetorical goal.
The option detailing how water dissolves the clasts and recrystallizes to plug fissures explains the self-healing mechanism. The options discussing historical assumptions by researchers and comparing costs to modern concrete fail to address this role.
Only the correct option successfully illustrates the active process of self-healing requested by the prompt.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Soru 149Soru

In 1783, the Montgolfier brothers, Joseph-Michel and Jacques-Étienne, made history by launching the first passenger-carrying hot air balloon in Versailles, France. The balloon, constructed of paper and silk, carried a sheep, a duck, and a rooster to test the safety of flight in the upper atmosphere. Versailles, famous for its grand palace, had served as the seat of French political power since 1682. The successful eight-minute flight proved that living creatures could survive the ascent, paving the way for the first human balloonists later that year.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the balloon flight with unrelated details about the history of Versailles.

Cevap

Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the balloon flight with unrelated details about the history of Versailles.
The correct option is the one stating the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus. The paragraph focuses on the pioneering hot air balloon flight of the Montgolfier brothers. The historical and political background of Versailles, while factual, is irrelevant to the scientific and narrative details of the aviation experiment and should be removed.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the hot air balloon launch by the Montgolfier brothers in 1783, including the construction of the balloon, the animals carried as passengers, and the success of the test flight.
Understanding the paragraph's topic is necessary to evaluate the relevance of any single sentence.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the underlined sentence to the paragraph's main focus.
The underlined sentence discusses the political history of Versailles as the seat of French power since 1682. This detail does not contribute to the narrative of the balloon flight or its scientific significance.
This helps determine whether the sentence should be kept or deleted.
3
Choose the option that states the correct action (delete) and provides the correct rhetorical reason.
The sentence should be deleted because it introduces irrelevant information about Versailles, interrupting the focus on the aviation event.
Only one option correctly identifies the action and logical justification.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Soru 150Soru

Passage Excerpt:

Before the invention of radar, the British military constructed acoustic mirrors along the Kent coast to detect the drone of approaching enemy aircraft. [Sentence] These monolithic structures functioned like giant ears, reflecting sound waves onto a central microphone. However, the rapidly increasing speed of modern aircraft in the late 1930s soon rendered this network obsolete.

Which choice most effectively emphasizes the immense scale and distinctive geometry of the acoustic mirrors, highlighting their visual impact on the coastline?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Rising up to thirty feet high, the colossal concrete dish-like walls curved abruptly against the flat marshland.

Cevap

Rising up to thirty feet high, the colossal concrete dish-like walls curved abruptly against the flat marshland.
The correct option is grammatically correct and satisfies all components of the prompt's rhetorical goal. It highlights scale using the words 'colossal' and 'thirty feet high,' presents a clear geometric description with 'dish-like' and 'curved abruptly,' and conveys visual impact on the coastline with the contrast of the walls 'against the flat marshland.'

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goals.
The prompt requires a choice that emphasizes three distinct elements: (1) immense scale, (2) distinctive geometry, and (3) visual impact on the coastline.
Understanding the exact criteria of the rhetorical goal is necessary to evaluate the options.
2
Evaluate each option for grammatical correctness.
The options detailing the creation with local gravel, the administrative warning times, and the rising dish-like walls are grammatically correct. However, the option starting with 'The massive concrete structures loomed...' contains a comma splice, joining two independent clauses with only a comma, making it grammatically incorrect.
ACT English requires the correct answer to be both grammatically correct and rhetorically appropriate.
3
Evaluate the grammatically correct options against the rhetorical goals.
The option about local gravel and cement focuses on materials and physics. The option about warning times focuses on operational metrics. The option starting with 'Rising up to thirty feet high' directly addresses scale ('thirty feet high', 'colossal'), geometry ('dish-like', 'curved abruptly'), and coastal visual impact ('against the flat marshland').
Comparing the remaining options ensures that only the one meeting all prompt criteria is selected.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Soru 151Soru

The following sentences are from a draft of an essay about ancient maritime navigation. To ensure that the paragraph logically builds its claim that navigators could locate islands using ocean swells, what is the most logical order for these sentences?

Öğeleri doğru sıraya koymak için sürükleyin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct sequence of sentences starts with the claim about Polynesian navigators, followed by the explanation of wave interference patterns, then the method of sensing these deviations, and finally the successful navigational outcome.
The paragraph flows logically from a broad claim to specific physical evidence, followed by the wayfinders' detection method, and finally the successful navigational result. The logical progression is reinforced by cohesive references: the wave interference patterns in the second sentence are referenced as 'these subtle deviations' in the third, which are then summarized as 'these distinct directional shifts' in the final sentence.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the topic sentence that establishes the main claim.
The sentence introducing the navigators' reliance on ocean swells to detect distant islands must be placed first.
It sets the context and states the central claim that the rest of the paragraph supports.
2
Find the explanation for the claim's physical mechanism.
The sentence explaining how islands disrupt open-ocean swells to create wave interference patterns should be placed second.
It provides the scientific basis of the claim and introduces the concept of wave disruption.
3
Connect the detection method to the physical mechanism using pronoun cues.
The sentence describing how navigators sensed 'these subtle deviations' must be placed third.
The demonstrative pronoun 'these subtle deviations' directly refers to the wave interference patterns introduced in the second sentence.
4
Determine the concluding sentence that shows the result of this method.
The sentence stating that wayfinders could determine an island's bearing by interpreting 'these distinct directional shifts' must be placed last.
It summarizes the outcome of the navigation technique and uses the phrase 'these distinct directional shifts' to refer back to the physical sensations described in the third sentence.

Anahtar Kavram

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Soru 152Soru

Passage excerpt:

Deep in the forests of Japan's Echizen province, master papermakers continue to practice the ancient art of crafting washi. During the coldest months of winter, artisans stand in freezing mountain streams to wash the raw mulberry fibers, which are then beaten on stone slabs, ________.

The writer wants to choose a phrase that most effectively contrasts the grueling physical labor of the papermaking process with the delicate, refined quality of the finished product. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: a bone-chilling chore that ultimately yields a sheet of paper famed for its gossamer texture and soft, organic sheen.

Cevap

The choice describing the papermaking process as a 'bone-chilling chore' that produces paper with a 'gossamer texture and soft, organic sheen' is correct because it successfully achieves the writer's goal of contrasting grueling labor with a delicate final product while maintaining correct grammar.
The correct option effectively fulfills the prompt's requirement by contrasting the intense physical difficulty of the task ('bone-chilling chore') with the delicate beauty of the final product ('gossamer texture and soft, organic sheen'). It fits grammatically into the sentence as an appositive modifying the action of washing and beating the fibers.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt's rhetorical goal.
The target phrase must achieve two things: highlight grueling physical labor and highlight the delicate, refined quality of the finished washi paper.
Understanding the specific rhetorical criteria is necessary to evaluate the options.
2
Evaluate the grammatical correctness of the options in context.
The option containing 'was performed' shifts inappropriately into the past tense, while the option containing 'the work is grueling, it creates...' creates a comma splice. The remaining options are grammatically correct.
ACT English questions require any chosen answer to be grammatically correct within the context of the sentence.
3
Select the grammatically correct option that fulfills the rhetorical goal.
The option referring to a 'bone-chilling chore' (grueling labor) and 'gossamer texture and soft, organic sheen' (refined quality) is the only choice that meets both criteria.
This option satisfies all constraints of the prompt and the passage.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 153Soru

Chef Marcus Samuelsson is known for fusing diverse culinary traditions to create unique dishes. In his signature restaurant, he blends ingredients from his Swedish upbringing with flavors from East Africa. [1]

The writer wants to add a sentence at point [1] that provides a specific example of a dish that represents this fusion of Swedish and East African cultures. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: For instance, he serves Swedish meatballs seasoned with berbere, a spicy Ethiopian blend.

Cevap

For instance, he serves Swedish meatballs seasoned with berbere, a spicy Ethiopian blend.
The correct option is the sentence that details serving Swedish meatballs seasoned with berbere, a spicy Ethiopian blend. This choice directly satisfies the writer's goal by naming a specific dish and illustrating the fusion of Swedish and East African cultures.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to find a sentence that provides a specific example of a dish that fuses Swedish and East African culinary traditions.
Understanding the precise criteria of the prompt is essential for eliminating options that are grammatically correct but topically irrelevant.
2
Evaluate the choices to check if they describe a specific dish with fusion elements.
The option proposing Swedish meatballs seasoned with berbere is the only choice that names a specific dish and explicitly combines elements from both Swedish and East African (Ethiopian) cooking.
This directly fulfills the requested rhetorical criteria.
3
Identify grammatical and rhetorical issues in the distractors.
The options discussing menu accolades and traditional Swedish ingredients are grammatically correct but fail the rhetorical goal. The option mentioning younger cooks is both a rhetorical mismatch and a comma splice.
Verifying the distractors ensures that the correct answer is the unique and grammatically sound choice that meets the goal.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Soru 154Soru

Given the following paragraph:

[1] __________________. In 1943, Cousteau and engineer Émile Gagnan co-invented the Aqua-Lung, an open-circuit scuba technology. This revolutionary device allowed divers to breathe underwater without being tethered to a surface air supply. Armed with this new freedom, Cousteau spent decades filming underwater documentaries, bringing the mysteries of the deep ocean into the living rooms of millions of viewers worldwide.

Which choice provides the most effective introduction to the paragraph?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: French oceanographer Jacques Cousteau transformed our understanding of the oceans through his inventions and explorations.

Cevap

French oceanographer Jacques Cousteau transformed our understanding of the oceans through his inventions and explorations.
The correct option is grammatically correct and successfully previews the paragraph's dual focus on technological invention (the Aqua-Lung) and ocean exploration (his documentaries).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the primary topics discussed in the paragraph's body sentences.
The paragraph details the co-invention of the Aqua-Lung (an invention) and the subsequent filming of underwater documentaries (explorations).
An effective introduction must establish the paragraph's main focus by previewing these key elements.
2
Evaluate the grammar of the choices to eliminate structurally incorrect sentences.
One option contains a comma splice, another is a dependent clause fragment, and a third contains a subject-verb agreement error where a singular subject is paired with a plural verb.
ACT English questions require that the chosen option be grammatically correct.
3
Choose the grammatically correct option that best introduces the dual focus of the paragraph.
The statement describing Cousteau's transformation of our understanding of the oceans through inventions and explorations is both grammatically correct and thematic.
It encapsulates both the technological development and the oceanographic exploration detailed in the paragraph.

Anahtar Kavram

Establishing Introductions and Thesis Statements
Soru 155Soru

Translating the Machine

[1]
In 1947, Grace Hopper, a mathematician and pioneer in computer programming, was working on the Harvard Mark II computer when she and her team discovered a literal bug—a moth trapped in a relay, impeding the machine’s operation. While this incident popularized the term "debugging," Hopper's most significant contribution was yet to come. She envisioned a future where programming was accessible, proposing that computers could be programmed using English-like statements rather than binary code.

[2]
At the time, the computing establishment was highly skeptical. Many believed that computers were purely mathematical instruments capable only of arithmetic, and that writing programs in natural language was an impossibility. Undeterred, Hopper joined the Eckert-Mauchly Computer Corporation in 1949 and began developing the first compiler, a program that would translate human-readable source code into machine language. By 1952, her compiler, known as the A-0, was operational, paving the way for modern programming languages like COBOL.

[3]
Hopper’s work revolutionized how humans interacted with machines. Instead of writing tedious strings of octal or binary code, programmers could write instructions using mathematical symbols and English words. The compiler would then do the translation. This shift not only democratized programming by making it accessible to non-mathematicians but also dramatically increased efficiency and reduced errors, laying the groundwork for the software industry.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that describes how Grace Hopper's invention of the compiler overcame early skepticism to fundamentally change computer programming. Is the statement that the passage successfully fulfills this goal true or false?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The correct answer is True because the essay successfully presents Grace Hopper's invention of the compiler, explains the skepticism of the computing establishment, and details the revolutionary impact on programming.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the proposed writing goal in the prompt.
The goal contains three key requirements: describing Hopper's compiler invention, showing how she overcame early skepticism, and explaining how it fundamentally changed programming.
To establish a checklist of what needs to be verified in the passage.
2
Scan the passage for references to skepticism and the compiler's creation.
Paragraph 2 details that the computing establishment was highly skeptical and believed natural-language programming was impossible, but Hopper built the A-0 compiler by 1952 anyway.
To check if the first two components of the goal are addressed.
3
Scan the passage for references to how programming changed.
Paragraph 3 describes how the compiler allowed programming with English words instead of binary strings, democratizing programming and increasing efficiency.
To check if the final component of the goal is addressed.
4
Synthesize findings to determine if the goal is met.
Since all parts of the goal are covered in the text, the statement is true.
To finalize the evaluation of the true/false statement.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 156Soru

[1] In the winter of 1902, during a visit to New York City, Mary Anderson observed a trolley driver struggling to keep the windshield clear of freezing sleet. [2] The driver had to open the front window, lean out into the icy wind, or even stop the trolley entirely to wipe the glass by hand. [3] Recognizing a clear need, Anderson sketched a design for a hand-operated rubber squeegee blade that could be controlled via a lever inside the vehicle. [4] She was granted a patent for her window-cleaning device in 1903. [5] Early twentieth-century trolleys and automobiles operated at much slower speeds than modern vehicles do. [6] Unfortunately, automotive manufacturers of the era failed to see the commercial value in her design, mistakenly believing that the motion of the blades would distract drivers.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the paragraph. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the development and reception of Anderson's invention with an irrelevant detail about the operating speeds of early vehicles.

Cevap

Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the development and reception of Anderson's invention with an irrelevant detail about the operating speeds of early vehicles.
The correct choice is the option that suggests deleting the sentence because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the development and reception of Anderson's invention. The paragraph is centered on how Mary Anderson saw a problem and invented a solution, which was subsequently rejected by manufacturers. The speed of early twentieth-century vehicles is an unrelated detail that distracts from this sequence of events.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes Mary Anderson observing a problem, inventing the windshield wiper, receiving a patent, and having it rejected by manufacturers.
Establishing the paragraph's core topic is necessary to evaluate the relevance of any single sentence.
2
Evaluate the content and role of Sentence 5.
Sentence 5 discusses the slow speeds of early twentieth-century vehicles compared to modern ones.
Determining what Sentence 5 contributes allows us to see if it supports the core topic or distracts from it.
3
Determine whether to keep or delete the sentence based on its relevance.
The sentence shifts the focus away from the invention story to general vehicle speeds, making it irrelevant. It should be deleted.
Irrelevant sentences that disrupt the flow and focus of a paragraph should be deleted.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Soru 157Soru

[1] In the mid-twentieth century, geologist Marie Tharp set out to map the ocean floor, utilizing sonar data to draft the first comprehensive three-dimensional representation of the seabed. [2] Barred from research vessels due to her gender, Tharp relied entirely on depth profiles collected by her colleague Bruce Heezen. [3] By painstakingly plotting these profiles by hand, she identified a deep, continuous V-shaped valley slicing through the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. [4] Initially, Heezen dismissed Tharp's drawings as "girl talk," fearing that the existence of a central rift valley would lend credibility to the then-marginalized theory of continental drift. [5] It was not until independent photographic evidence of the rift was obtained that Heezen and the scientific establishment accepted Tharp's map as accurate.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the paragraph (placed after Sentence 4):

"Continental drift, first proposed by Alfred Wegener in 1912, suggested that Earth's continents had once been joined as a single landmass before drifting apart."

Should the writer make this addition?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No, because it interrupts the paragraph's narrative flow by introducing biographical and historical details about a different scientist.

Cevap

No, because it interrupts the paragraph's narrative flow by introducing biographical and historical details about a different scientist.
The correct answer is the option stating that the sentence should not be added because it interrupts the paragraph's narrative flow by introducing biographical and historical details about a different scientist. The paragraph's focus is on Tharp's role in mapping the ocean floor and the discovery of the rift valley; adding information about Alfred Wegener and the definition of continental drift shifts the focus away from Tharp's narrative.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph centers on Marie Tharp's scientific work, specifically her efforts to map the ocean floor, her discovery of the rift valley, and the scientific community's eventual validation of her work.
Understanding the paragraph's primary focus is essential to evaluating whether any proposed addition is relevant or represents a digression.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence defines continental drift and attributes it to Alfred Wegener in 1912. This information shifts the subject to a different historical figure and theory, which is not the main focus of the passage.
Determining the function of the proposed sentence reveals if it contributes to or disrupts the development of the paragraph.
3
Select the option that correctly identifies the addition as irrelevant and provides the appropriate rhetorical justification.
The correct option states that the sentence should not be added because it interrupts the narrative flow by introducing details about a different scientist.
Only one choice correctly advises against the addition and identifies the correct rhetorical reason for doing so.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Soru 158Soru

A writer is editing a draft of an essay about the botanist Ynes Mexia.

[1] In her mid-fifties, Ynes Mexia began her career as a botanical collector, embarking on rugged expeditions across the Americas that would redefine the field. [2] Unlike many of her contemporaries who remained in laboratories, Mexia traveled deep into remote wildernesses, including the dense rainforests of the Amazon, to locate rare specimens. [3] Her efforts yielded an astonishing number of discoveries that significantly expanded botanical databases. [4] She was known for her meticulous preparation of plant samples, which she dried and categorized under harsh conditions.

The writer wants to revise sentence [3] to provide the most specific and concrete evidence to support the claim that Mexia's work significantly expanded scientific knowledge of plants. Which of the following sentences best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Over her career, she collected nearly 145000145{}000 plant specimens, which resulted in the addition of over 500500 newly discovered species to scientific records.

Cevap

The sentence that specifies she collected nearly 145,000 plant specimens and added over 500 newly discovered species to scientific records.
The correct choice provides specific, concrete numerical data (nearly 145,000 specimens and over 500 new species) that directly supports the claim that the botanist's work expanded scientific databases. It is also grammatically correct, avoiding syntax errors.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the claim made in sentence 3 regarding Ynes Mexia's discoveries significantly expanding botanical databases.
The target claim requires evidence demonstrating the volume, scale, or impact of her collections on botanical records.
Identifying the target claim is essential for selecting the revision that provides direct supporting evidence.
2
Evaluate the choices for concrete, specific details that support this claim while checking for grammatical accuracy.
The revision detailing nearly 145,000 specimens and over 500 new species provides precise data, whereas the other options contain syntax errors (semicolon fragment, dangling modifier, comma splice) and lack concrete numbers.
Standardized tests require both rhetorical relevance (specific details) and grammatical correctness.

Anahtar Kavram

Supporting claims with specific, concrete evidence and details
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 159Soru

Beneath the streets of London lies a complex web of tunnels that represents one of the greatest engineering feats of the nineteenth century: the London Underground. In the 1840s, London was experiencing unprecedented growth, leading to extreme congestion on its narrow roads. Horse-drawn carriages, omnibuses, and pedestrians clogged the city center, making travel slow and chaotic. Charles Pearson, a city solicitor, proposed a radical solution—an underground railway to transport passengers between the city's main railway termini.

Construction on the Metropolitan Railway began in 1860 using the 'cut-and-cover' method. Workers dug a trench along existing roads, built brick arches over the tracks, and then repaved the street above. The line officially opened on January 10, 1863, utilizing steam locomotives that ran on coal, which often filled the tunnels with smoke. Despite the initial concerns about air quality and safety, the railway was an immediate success, carrying tens of thousands of passengers on its opening day.

This pioneering venture proved that subterranean transit was not only possible but also highly profitable. The success of the Metropolitan Railway paved the way for the expansion of underground transit systems in cities around the world, transforming urban planning and the daily commutes of millions.

Suppose the writer’s goal had been to write an essay that details the physical construction process and the initial public reception of the world's first underground passenger railway. The essay successfully accomplishes this goal.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement is correct because the essay details the 'cut-and-cover' method of construction and mentions the opening day success and safety concerns, thus fulfilling both parts of the stated writing goal.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the proposed goal to identify the required components.
The goal requires the essay to cover two main aspects: the physical construction process and the initial public reception of the first underground railway.
Breaking down the goal into distinct requirements allows for structured evaluation.
2
Scan the passage for details regarding the physical construction process.
The second paragraph describes the 'cut-and-cover' method, detailing how workers dug a trench, built brick arches over the tracks, and repaved the street.
This confirms that the first component of the writing goal is met.
3
Scan the passage for details regarding the initial public reception.
The second paragraph mentions that the line opened on January 10, 1863, and despite concerns about air quality and safety, it was an immediate success, carrying tens of thousands of passengers on opening day.
This confirms that the second component of the writing goal is met.
4
Formulate the final evaluation based on the evidence.
Since both elements of the writing goal are explicitly addressed in the essay, the statement is True.
Synthesizing the individual step evaluations leads to the correct answer choice.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Soru 160Soru

While visiting New York City in the winter of 1903, Mary Anderson noticed that streetcar drivers had to open their windows in the freezing rain to clear sleet from their windshields. She sketched a design for a hand-operated swinging arm with a rubber blade that could be controlled from inside the cabin. She was granted a patent for her device later that year, though manufacturing companies initially showed little interest. Today, windshield wipers are standard equipment on almost all motorized vehicles.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the end of the paragraph:

'During her trip to New York, Anderson also visited several popular art museums and historical landmarks.'

Should the writer make this addition?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No, because it deviates from the paragraph's focus on Anderson's invention of the windshield wiper.

Cevap

No, because it deviates from the paragraph's focus on Anderson's invention of the windshield wiper.
The paragraph focuses on Mary Anderson's invention of the windshield wiper, tracking the process from her observation of the problem to the patent and its modern use. The proposed sentence about visiting art museums and historical landmarks is irrelevant to this central focus, so it should not be added.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes how Mary Anderson observed a problem in New York City, designed the windshield wiper, patented it, and how it is used today.
Understanding the paragraph's main theme is necessary to evaluate whether new information is relevant.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the proposed sentence to the main focus.
The proposed sentence details Anderson's tourist activities (visiting museums and landmarks), which do not contribute to the narrative of how she invented and patented the windshield wiper.
This determines whether the sentence should be added (Yes) or not added (No).
3
Select the choice that correctly states the decision and provides the proper rhetorical justification.
The correct choice is the one stating that the writer should not add the sentence because it deviates from the paragraph's focus.
This completes the evaluation and matches the correct option.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
ÖncekiSayfa 8 / 18Sonraki
Topic Development Alıştırma Soruları — ACT — Sayfa 8 | Examkin