Two-Part Analysis

132 soru

Soru 41Soru

A marine biology research team conducted a two-year observational study to investigate a sharp decline in sea urchin populations following the deployment of new modular coastal breakwaters. The researchers hypothesized that trace copper leaching from the metallic reinforcement bars within the breakwaters directly caused the increased sea urchin mortality.

Match each logical argument role on the left with the statement on the right that best fulfills that role in evaluating the researchers' causal claim.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Statement that most strongly weakens the researchers' causal hypothesis
Statement that most strongly strengthens the researchers' causal hypothesis
Statement that exemplifies a causal direction reversal

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The statement regarding mortality rates rising prior to breakwater construction weakens the hypothesis; the statement comparing breakwaters without copper reinforcement strengthens the hypothesis; and the statement claiming dying urchins accelerate copper leaching exemplifies a causal direction reversal.
Matching the statement showing mortality preceded breakwaters to the weakening role is correct because a cause cannot postdate its effect. Matching the statement comparing copper-free breakwaters to the strengthening role is correct because it acts as a control isolating the copper variable. Matching the statement claiming dying urchins cause copper leaching to the causal reversal role is correct because it inverts the direction of causality.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the stem's causal claim.
The researchers claim that copper leaching from breakwater reinforcement bars (Cause) leads to increased sea urchin mortality (Effect).
Establishing clear cause and effect boundaries is essential before evaluating potential strengthening, weakening, or reversed statements.
2
Evaluate candidate statements for weakening the claim.
The observation that urchin mortality increased eight months prior to breakwater deployment shows that the effect preceded the cause, invalidating the proposed causal link.
A cause cannot occur after its effect.
3
Evaluate candidate statements for strengthening the claim.
The control group finding—where identical breakwaters without copper resulted in stable urchin populations—isolates copper as the specific causal driver.
Eliminating alternative explanations and showing that removing the cause eliminates the effect strengthens a causal argument.
4
Identify the statement representing a causal direction reversal.
The statement asserting that dying urchins accelerate copper leaching posits that the mortality event causes the copper leaching, reversing the hypothesized causal vector.
Causal reversal occurs when the outcome variable is mistaken for the driver variable.

Anahtar Kavram

Logical Arguments and Causal Relationships in Two-Part Analysis
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 42Soru

A factory manufactures two products, Product X and Product Y. Daily production is subject to the following constraints:
- Each unit of Product X requires 11 hour of machine time.
- Each unit of Product Y requires 22 hours of machine time.
- Total machine time available per day is at most 1010 hours.
- The factory must produce at least 22 units of Product X and at least 22 units of Product Y per day.
- Each unit of Product X yields a profit of $15\$15, and each unit of Product Y yields a profit of $20\$20.

Match each optimization metric on the left with its corresponding correct numerical value on the right.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Maximum possible production of Product Y (in units)
Number of units of Product X required to maximize total daily profit
Maximum total daily profit achievable (in dollars)

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Maximum possible production of Product Y matches 4; Units of Product X for maximum profit matches 6; Maximum total daily profit matches 130.
For the maximum production of Product Y, using the minimum required x=2x = 2 allows 2y=102=82y = 10 - 2 = 8, giving y=4y = 4. For maximum profit, each machine hour used on Product X yields $15\$15 per hour while each hour used on Product Y yields $20/2=$10\$20 / 2 = \$10 per hour. Thus, maximizing hours allocated to Product X subject to y2y \ge 2 gives y=2y = 2 and x=6x = 6, yielding a maximum profit of 15(6)+20(2)=13015(6) + 20(2) = 130 dollars.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formulate the system of constraints and profit objective function from the narrative context.
Let xx be units of Product X and yy be units of Product Y. Constraints are x2x \ge 2, y2y \ge 2, and x+2y10x + 2y \le 10. Objective is to maximize P=15x+20yP = 15x + 20y.
Establishing explicit algebraic inequalities defines the feasible decision region.
2
Calculate the upper bound for yy.
Setting x=2x = 2 (its minimum value), 2+2y10    2y8    y42 + 2y \le 10 \implies 2y \le 8 \implies y \le 4. Maximum y=4y = 4.
Minimizing xx leaves maximum machine time capacity available for Product Y.
3
Evaluate candidate feasible integer solutions (x,y)(x, y) to determine maximum daily profit.
Valid integer pairs on the boundary include (2,4)(2, 4) with P=110P = 110; (4,3)(4, 3) with P=120P = 120; and (6,2)(6, 2) with P=130P = 130.
Trading 1 unit of Product Y (losing $20\$20) for 2 units of Product X (gaining 2×$15=$302 \times \$15 = \$30) increases net profit by $10\$10 per unit trade.
4
Match each requested metric to its evaluated value.
Maximum Product Y = 4; Product X for max profit = 6; Maximum profit = 130.
Matches each question prompt to its calculated mathematical result.

Anahtar Kavram

Linear optimization under inequality bounds and integer constraints.
Soru 43Soru

A microgrid power station utilizes two types of energy storage units: Lithium-ion batteries and Flow batteries. A primary grid configuration consisting of 44 Lithium-ion batteries and 33 Flow batteries provides a total continuous storage capacity of 140 MWh140\text{ MWh}. An alternative configuration consisting of 22 Lithium-ion batteries and 55 Flow batteries provides a total continuous storage capacity of 126 MWh126\text{ MWh}. Assuming that each battery of a given type contributes a constant storage capacity, what is the individual storage capacity, in MWh, of one Lithium-ion battery and one Flow battery, respectively?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 23 MWh23\text{ MWh} for a Lithium-ion battery and 16 MWh16\text{ MWh} for a Flow battery

Cevap

The storage capacity is 23 MWh23\text{ MWh} for a Lithium-ion battery and 16 MWh16\text{ MWh} for a Flow battery.
The system of equations 4L+3F=1404L + 3F = 140 and 2L+5F=1262L + 5F = 126 uniquely determines L=23 MWhL = 23\text{ MWh} and F=16 MWhF = 16\text{ MWh}. The option specifying 23 MWh23\text{ MWh} for Lithium-ion and 16 MWh16\text{ MWh} for Flow correctly matches the values of LL and FF in their respective order.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Set up a system of two linear equations in two variables.
Let LL be the capacity of one Lithium-ion battery and FF be the capacity of one Flow battery:
Equation 1: 4L+3F=1404L + 3F = 140
Equation 2: 2L+5F=1262L + 5F = 126
Translate the physical battery configurations and total capacities into algebraic equations.
2
Eliminate variable LL by multiplying Equation 2 by 22.
Equation 2 scaled: 2(2L+5F)=2(126)4L+10F=2522(2L + 5F) = 2(126) \Rightarrow 4L + 10F = 252.
Align the coefficients of LL to subtract Equation 1 from the scaled Equation 2.
3
Subtract Equation 1 from the scaled equation to solve for FF.
(4L+10F)(4L+3F)=2521407F=112F=16(4L + 10F) - (4L + 3F) = 252 - 140 \Rightarrow 7F = 112 \Rightarrow F = 16.
Eliminating LL isolate the single-variable linear equation for FF.
4
Substitute F=16F = 16 back into Equation 2 to solve for LL.
2L+5(16)=1262L+80=1262L=46L=232L + 5(16) = 126 \Rightarrow 2L + 80 = 126 \Rightarrow 2L = 46 \Rightarrow L = 23.
Determine the value of LL once FF is known.

Anahtar Kavram

Simultaneous Linear Equations (System of 2 Equations with 2 Variables)
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 44Soru

A biotechnology laboratory operates two automated synthesis workflows, System X and System Y, to manufacture two compounds, Alpha (AA) and Beta (BB). System X operates for xx hours, producing AA at a rate of 3 mg/hr3\text{ mg/hr} and BB at a rate of 5 mg/hr5\text{ mg/hr}. System Y operates for yy hours, producing AA at a rate of 15 mg/hr15\text{ mg/hr} and BB at a rate of 8 mg/hr8\text{ mg/hr}. The combined mass of compounds AA and BB produced across both workflows is exactly 340 mg340\text{ mg}. Furthermore, the system's operating efficiency requires that the ratio of operating hours xy\frac{x}{y} equals the ratio of total mass produced BA\frac{B}{A}. What is the total operating time, x+yx + y, in hours?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 20

Cevap

The total operating time of both workflows is 20 hours.
Representing the total production of compounds A and B as functions of hours x and y yields the linear total mass equation 8x + 23y = 340 and the ratio relation x/y = B/A, which simplifies to the homogeneous quadratic 3x^2 + 10xy - 8y^2 = 0. Factoring gives (3x - 2y)(x + 4y) = 0. Since operating hours are strictly positive, x = (2/3)y. Substituting this into the linear equation yields (85/3)y = 340, giving y = 12 hours and x = 8 hours. The total operating time is 8 + 12 = 20 hours.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Set up algebraic expressions for total mass of each compound produced.
Compound A mass = 3x+15y3x + 15y mg; Compound B mass = 5x+8y5x + 8y mg.
Mass equals production rate multiplied by total operating hours.
2
Formulate the total combined production equation.
8x+23y=3408x + 23y = 340.
The sum of all Compound A and Compound B produced across both systems is given as 340 mg.
3
Set up and simplify the ratio equality xy=BA\frac{x}{y} = \frac{B}{A}.
3x2+10xy8y2=03x^2 + 10xy - 8y^2 = 0.
Cross-multiplying xy=5x+8y3x+15y\frac{x}{y} = \frac{5x + 8y}{3x + 15y} gives x(3x+15y)=y(5x+8y)x(3x + 15y) = y(5x + 8y).
4
Factor the homogeneous quadratic equation.
(3x2y)(x+4y)=0    x=23y(3x - 2y)(x + 4y) = 0 \implies x = \frac{2}{3}y.
Because operating hours xx and yy must be positive, x+4y>0x + 4y > 0, forcing 3x2y=03x - 2y = 0.
5
Substitute x=23yx = \frac{2}{3}y into 8x+23y=3408x + 23y = 340.
y=12y = 12 hours and x=8x = 8 hours.
Solving 853y=340\frac{85}{3}y = 340 gives y=12y = 12, and substituting back into x=23yx = \frac{2}{3}y gives x=8x = 8.
6
Compute total operating time x+yx + y.
8+12=208 + 12 = 20 hours.
The question asks for the combined total operating time of both systems.

Anahtar Kavram

Solving non-linear systems of simultaneous equations involving ratio constraints and quadratic factorization
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
Soru 45Soru

A telecommunications company conducted a 12-month study across 40 regional markets to evaluate why customer churn dropped significantly following the introduction of a self-service mobile application. The lead analyst hypothesized that the mobile application's automated troubleshooting feature directly caused the reduction in customer churn by resolving service disruptions without requiring support calls. Which TWO of the following statements, if true, most strongly strengthen the lead analyst's causal hypothesis?

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: In a controlled subset of markets where all application features except automated troubleshooting were enabled, customer churn rates remained identical to pre-application levels.; In markets where the automated troubleshooting feature was actively used, support call volume for service disruptions decreased by 45%, coinciding directly with the sharpest drops in customer churn.

Cevap

The two statements that strengthen the hypothesis are: (1) the statement showing that market subsets lacking only the automated troubleshooting feature experienced no drop in churn, and (2) the statement showing that active troubleshooting use directly correlated with decreased support calls for disruptions and reduced churn.
The lead analyst's hypothesis asserts that the automated troubleshooting feature reduced churn by resolving service disruptions. The statement demonstrating that markets with all app features except troubleshooting experienced no change in churn isolates the troubleshooting feature as the necessary cause. The statement showing that active troubleshooting usage led to decreased disruption support calls alongside drops in churn provides positive empirical confirmation of the underlying mechanism.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core causal claim in the argument stem.
The lead analyst claims that the automated troubleshooting feature (Cause) directly led to lower customer churn (Effect) by resolving service disruptions without support calls (Mechanism).
Strengthening a causal claim requires establishing that the cause produces the effect and ruling out alternative causes or reversed causality.
2
Evaluate statements for evidence that supports the causal mechanism or isolates the cause.
The statement showing churn remained unchanged when all features EXCEPT troubleshooting were present isolates the troubleshooting feature as the essential cause. The statement linking active troubleshooting usage to fewer call disruptions and lower churn confirms the proposed mechanism.
These two statements provide controlled evidence supporting the exact causal link hypothesized by the analyst.
3
Identify distractors containing causal reversals, alternative explanations, or irrelevant data.
The option describing disruption frequency driving app downloads reverses cause and effect. The option regarding nationwide price discounts introduces a confounding variable. The option regarding survey response rates provides irrelevant data.
Distractor options either weaken the argument or fail to address the core causal mechanism.

Anahtar Kavram

Causal Arguments and Two-Part Logical Strengthening
Soru 46Soru

An event management firm hires two types of security personnel: Senior Officers and Junior Officers. Contract A requires 4 Senior Officers and 6 Junior Officers for a total daily cost of 2,180.ContractBrequires7SeniorOfficersand3JuniorOfficersforatotaldailycostof2,180. Contract B requires 7 Senior Officers and 3 Junior Officers for a total daily cost of 2,690. Based on this system of equations, match each quantity on the left with its correct dollar value on the right.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Daily rate of one Senior Officer
Daily rate of one Junior Officer
Difference in daily rates between one Senior Officer and one Junior Officer
Combined daily rate for a team of 1 Senior Officer and 1 Junior Officer

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Senior Officer rate = 320;JuniorOfficerrate=320; Junior Officer rate = 150; Difference in rates = 170;Combinedrate=170; Combined rate = 470.
Solving the linear system yields s=320s = 320 for Senior Officers and j=150j = 150 for Junior Officers. The difference between their rates is 320150=170,andtheircombineddailyrateis320 - 150 = 170, and their combined daily rate is 320 + 150 = 470.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formulate a system of linear equations from the given contract conditions.
Let ss be the daily rate of a Senior Officer and jj be the daily rate of a Junior Officer. Equation 1: 4s+6j=21804s + 6j = 2180. Equation 2: 7s+3j=26907s + 3j = 2690.
Translating context into algebraic form allows systematic elimination.
2
Eliminate the variable jj to solve for ss.
Divide Equation 1 by 2: 2s+3j=10902s + 3j = 1090. Subtract this from Equation 2 (7s+3j=26907s + 3j = 2690): (7s+3j)(2s+3j)=26901090    5s=1600    s=320(7s + 3j) - (2s + 3j) = 2690 - 1090 \implies 5s = 1600 \implies s = 320.
Matching coefficients of jj isolates variable ss cleanly.
3
Substitute s=320s = 320 into 2s+3j=10902s + 3j = 1090 to calculate jj.
2(320)+3j=1090    640+3j=1090    3j=450    j=1502(320) + 3j = 1090 \implies 640 + 3j = 1090 \implies 3j = 450 \implies j = 150.
Determines the second variable value in the system.
4
Compute the difference (sjs - j) and sum (s+js + j) of the two rates.
Difference: 320150=170320 - 150 = 170. Combined rate: 320+150=470320 + 150 = 470.
Provides the exact target values for all items in the matching task.

Anahtar Kavram

Solving simultaneous linear equations by variable elimination and substitution
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 47Soru

A chemical processing facility operates two purification units, Unit A and Unit B.

Unit A processes a liquid feed stream consisting of xx liters of Compound X and yy liters of Compound Y per hour. During an 8-hour operational cycle, Unit A processes a total of 360360 liters of feed stream.

Unit B processes Compound X at twice the hourly rate of Unit A (2x2x liters per hour) and Compound Y at three times the hourly rate of Unit A (3y3y liters per hour). During a 5-hour operational cycle, Unit B processes a total of 510510 liters of feed stream.

Based on the information provided, select for Unit A Compound X Rate the number of liters of Compound X processed by Unit A per hour, and select for Unit A Compound Y Rate the number of liters of Compound Y processed by Unit A per hour. Make exactly one selection in each column.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Unit A Compound X Rate (liters/hour)
Unit A Compound Y Rate (liters/hour)

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The hourly processing rate of Compound X for Unit A is 33 liters per hour, and the hourly processing rate of Compound Y for Unit A is 12 liters per hour.
Formulating equations from the operational cycles yields 8(x+y)=360    x+y=458(x + y) = 360 \implies x + y = 45 and 5(2x+3y)=510    2x+3y=1025(2x + 3y) = 510 \implies 2x + 3y = 102. Expressing yy as 45x45 - x and substituting into the second equation gives 2x+3(45x)=1022x + 3(45 - x) = 102, which simplifies to x+135=102    x=33-x + 135 = 102 \implies x = 33. Substituting x=33x = 33 back gives y=12y = 12. Therefore, Unit A processes 33 liters of Compound X per hour and 12 liters of Compound Y per hour.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Set up the first linear equation using the total volume processed by Unit A during its 8-hour operational cycle.
8(x+y)=360    x+y=458(x + y) = 360 \implies x + y = 45
Unit A processes x+yx + y liters per hour, so over 8 hours it processes 8(x+y)=3608(x + y) = 360 liters.
2
Set up the second linear equation using the total volume processed by Unit B during its 5-hour operational cycle.
5(2x+3y)=510    2x+3y=1025(2x + 3y) = 510 \implies 2x + 3y = 102
Unit B processes 2x+3y2x + 3y liters per hour, so over 5 hours it processes 5(2x+3y)=5105(2x + 3y) = 510 liters.
3
Solve the system of two simultaneous linear equations for xx and yy.
x=33x = 33 and y=12y = 12
From equation 1, y=45xy = 45 - x. Substituting into equation 2 gives 2x+3(45x)=102    2x+1353x=102    x=33    x=332x + 3(45 - x) = 102 \implies 2x + 135 - 3x = 102 \implies -x = -33 \implies x = 33. Thus y=4533=12y = 45 - 33 = 12.

Anahtar Kavram

Solving systems of simultaneous linear equations by substitution or elimination in a Two-Part Analysis framework.
Soru 48Soru

An agricultural cooperative prepares custom soil treatments using two standard nutrient formulations: Formulation X and Formulation Y. Each bag of Formulation X contains 4 kg4\text{ kg} of Nitrogen and 2 kg2\text{ kg} of Phosphate. Each bag of Formulation Y contains 2 kg2\text{ kg} of Nitrogen and 5 kg5\text{ kg} of Phosphate. A commercial farm requires a total of exactly 140 kg140\text{ kg} of Nitrogen and 150 kg150\text{ kg} of Phosphate for its crops. Which of the following pairs (X,Y)(X, Y) represents the exact number of bags of Formulation X and Formulation Y, respectively, needed to fulfill these requirements?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 25 bags of Formulation X and 20 bags of Formulation Y

Cevap

25 bags of Formulation X and 20 bags of Formulation Y
The correct answer is 25 bags of Formulation X and 20 bags of Formulation Y because substituting x=25x = 25 and y=20y = 20 into the system of equations satisfies both constraints: 4(25)+2(20)=140 kg4(25) + 2(20) = 140\text{ kg} Nitrogen and 2(25)+5(20)=150 kg2(25) + 5(20) = 150\text{ kg} Phosphate.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Set up the simultaneous equations for Nitrogen and Phosphate requirements.
Let xx be the number of bags of Formulation X and yy be the number of bags of Formulation Y.
Nitrogen Equation: 4x+2y=1404x + 2y = 140
Phosphate Equation: 2x+5y=1502x + 5y = 150
Each bag contributes a specific amount of nutrient toward the target total.
2
Simplify the first equation and express yy in terms of xx.
2x+y=70    y=702x2x + y = 70 \implies y = 70 - 2x
Dividing the Nitrogen equation by 2 isolates yy conveniently for substitution.
3
Substitute y=702xy = 70 - 2x into the Phosphate equation.
2x+5(702x)=150    2x+35010x=150    8x=200    x=252x + 5(70 - 2x) = 150 \implies 2x + 350 - 10x = 150 \implies -8x = -200 \implies x = 25
Solving the single-variable linear equation yields the required bags of Formulation X.
4
Calculate yy using the simplified expression.
y=702(25)=20y = 70 - 2(25) = 20
Determines the required bags of Formulation Y.

Anahtar Kavram

Solving Systems of Simultaneous Linear Equations
Soru 49Soru

A logistics terminal at a seaport utilizes two types of automated cranes, Model X and Model Y, to unload container ships. During the morning shift, a fleet of 4 Model X cranes and 5 Model Y cranes unloaded a total of 330 containers. During the afternoon shift, a fleet of 6 Model X cranes and 2 Model Y cranes unloaded the same total of 330 containers. Assuming all cranes of a given model operate at a constant unloading rate per shift, select the value in the table that represents the number of containers unloaded per shift by a single Model X crane and the value that represents the number of containers unloaded per shift by a single Model Y crane.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Model X Crane
Model Y Crane

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Model X Crane unloads 45 containers per shift, and Model Y Crane unloads 30 containers per shift.
Setting up the system 4x+5y=3304x + 5y = 330 and 6x+2y=3306x + 2y = 330 yields x=45x = 45 for Model X and y=30y = 30 for Model Y. Substituting these values into both equations confirms accuracy: 4(45)+5(30)=180+150=3304(45) + 5(30) = 180 + 150 = 330 and 6(45)+2(30)=270+60=3306(45) + 2(30) = 270 + 60 = 330.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Define variables and construct the system of linear equations from the given problem statement.
Let xx be the number of containers unloaded per shift by a Model X crane, and yy be the number of containers unloaded per shift by a Model Y crane. Morning shift equation: 4x+5y=3304x + 5y = 330. Afternoon shift equation: 6x+2y=3306x + 2y = 330.
Translating word problem constraints into explicit algebraic equations is required to solve for both unknowns.
2
Express yy in terms of xx using the afternoon shift equation.
2y=3306x    y=1653x2y = 330 - 6x \implies y = 165 - 3x.
Using substitution allows reducing the two-variable system to a single equation in one variable.
3
Substitute the expression for yy into the morning shift equation and solve for xx.
4x+5(1653x)=330    4x+82515x=330    11x=495    x=454x + 5(165 - 3x) = 330 \implies 4x + 825 - 15x = 330 \implies -11x = -495 \implies x = 45.
Solving the single-variable equation determines the exact unloading capacity of a Model X crane.
4
Substitute x=45x = 45 back into the expression for yy to find the capacity of a Model Y crane.
y=1653(45)=165135=30y = 165 - 3(45) = 165 - 135 = 30.
Substituting the value of xx gives the specific unloading rate for Model Y.

Anahtar Kavram

Simultaneous Linear Equations in Two Variables
Soru 50Soru

A cloud server processes data batches across three sequential stages (k=1,2,3k = 1, 2, 3). At the start (k=0k = 0), the server has a Buffer size of B0=100 MBB_0 = 100\text{ MB} and a Queue size of Q0=50 MBQ_0 = 50\text{ MB}. In each stage kk, the sizes are updated according to the following rules:
- Bk=Bk120 MBB_k = B_{k-1} - 20\text{ MB}
- Qk=Qk1+10 MBQ_k = Q_{k-1} + 10\text{ MB}

Which of the following statements about the state of the server are true?

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: At the end of Stage 2 (k=2k = 2), the Buffer size B2B_2 is 60 MB60\text{ MB}.; At the end of Stage 3 (k=3k = 3), the Queue size Q3Q_3 is 80 MB80\text{ MB}.

Cevap

The correct statements are that at the end of Stage 2, the Buffer size is 60 MB60\text{ MB}, and at the end of Stage 3, the Queue size is 80 MB80\text{ MB}.
The correct statements accurately reflect the iterative evaluation of the state transition formulas: the buffer size decreases by 20 MB20\text{ MB} each stage to reach 60 MB60\text{ MB} at Stage 2, and the queue size increases by 10 MB10\text{ MB} each stage to reach 80 MB80\text{ MB} at Stage 3.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Calculate state values at Stage 1 (k=1k = 1)
B1=10020=80 MBB_1 = 100 - 20 = 80\text{ MB} and Q1=50+10=60 MBQ_1 = 50 + 10 = 60\text{ MB}. Combined total: 140 MB140\text{ MB}.
Apply the given state transition rules to the initial values at k=0k = 0.
2
Calculate state values at Stage 2 (k=2k = 2)
B2=8020=60 MBB_2 = 80 - 20 = 60\text{ MB} and Q2=60+10=70 MBQ_2 = 60 + 10 = 70\text{ MB}.
Apply the transition rules to the Stage 1 state values.
3
Calculate state values at Stage 3 (k=3k = 3)
B3=6020=40 MBB_3 = 60 - 20 = 40\text{ MB} and Q3=70+10=80 MBQ_3 = 70 + 10 = 80\text{ MB}.
Apply the transition rules to the Stage 2 state values.
4
Evaluate option statements
The statement specifying B2=60 MBB_2 = 60\text{ MB} and the statement specifying Q3=80 MBQ_3 = 80\text{ MB} are verified as correct.
Compare calculated stage states directly against the option statements.

Anahtar Kavram

Sequential processes require evaluating every state transition iteratively without skipping intermediate stages.
Soru 51Soru

A telecommunications satellite utilizes two distinct signal amplifier modules, Module A and Module B, to process high-frequency and low-frequency data streams. Each Module A processes 18 Gbps18\text{ Gbps} of high-frequency data and 12 Gbps12\text{ Gbps} of low-frequency data, consuming 150 watts150\text{ watts} of operational power. Each Module B processes 30 Gbps30\text{ Gbps} of high-frequency data and 6 Gbps6\text{ Gbps} of low-frequency data, consuming 180 watts180\text{ watts} of operational power. During a peak transmission test, the active modules processed a combined total of 354 Gbps354\text{ Gbps} of high-frequency data and 138 Gbps138\text{ Gbps} of low-frequency data. What is the total operational power, in watts, consumed by all the active modules during this test?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 2460

Cevap

The total operational power consumed by all active modules during the test is 2,460 watts.
By setting up a system of simultaneous equations representing the total high-frequency (18a+30b=35418a + 30b = 354) and low-frequency (12a+6b=13812a + 6b = 138) bandwidths, solving yields a=8a = 8 active Module A units and b=7b = 7 active Module B units. Substituting these module counts into the total power equation 150(8)+180(7)150(8) + 180(7) gives exactly 2,460 watts.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Define variables for the unknown counts of modules.
Let aa represent the number of Module A units and bb represent the number of Module B units.
Establishing explicit variables allows representing the data throughput and power constraints as algebraic equations.
2
Formulate equations for high-frequency and low-frequency data streams based on total throughput.
High-frequency equation: 18a+30b=35418a + 30b = 354. Low-frequency equation: 12a+6b=13812a + 6b = 138.
Summing the data contributions from each module type gives the total processed bandwidth for each frequency band.
3
Solve the system of linear equations.
Simplifying the low-frequency equation yields 2a+b=23    b=232a2a + b = 23 \implies b = 23 - 2a. Substituting into the simplified high-frequency equation (3a+5b=593a + 5b = 59) gives 3a+5(232a)=59    7a=56    a=83a + 5(23 - 2a) = 59 \implies -7a = -56 \implies a = 8. Substituting a=8a = 8 back into b=232(8)b = 23 - 2(8) gives b=7b = 7.
Determining the exact number of active modules of each type is required before calculating overall energy usage.
4
Calculate the total power consumption.
Total Power = 150a+180b=150(8)+180(7)=1,200+1,260=2,460 watts150a + 180b = 150(8) + 180(7) = 1,200 + 1,260 = 2,460\text{ watts}.
Multiplying the module counts by their respective wattage ratings yields the total operational power.

Anahtar Kavram

Solving systems of simultaneous linear equations with two unknowns and applying the solution to calculate a weighted linear total.
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
Soru 52Soru

A marine research consortium monitored 40 coastal inlets over a three-year period to evaluate the impact of deploying synthetic kelp modules intended to restore abalone populations. Inlets equipped with synthetic kelp modules exhibited a 30 percent increase in juvenile abalone survival relative to control inlets lacking the modules. Based on these findings, a lead biologist hypothesized that synthetic kelp modules increased juvenile abalone survival by providing physical shelter from predatory sea otters.

Select for Column 1 the statement that most strongly strengthens the biologist's shelter hypothesis against potential confounding factors. Select for Column 2 the statement that exemplifies a causal direction reversal regarding abalone population density and synthetic kelp module presence.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Column 1: Statement that strengthens the shelter hypothesis
Column 2: Statement demonstrating causal direction reversal

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

For Column 1, the statement strengthening the shelter hypothesis is the observation that inlets with synthetic kelp modules saw a steep decline in otter-related abalone mortality while control inlets saw no such decline. For Column 2, the statement demonstrating causal direction reversal is the claim that higher pre-existing densities of juvenile abalone cause technicians to deploy synthetic kelp modules in those specific inlets.
For Column 1, demonstrating that otter-specific predation declined exclusively in inlets containing synthetic kelp directly validates the predator-shelter mechanism proposed by the biologist. For Column 2, asserting that higher existing abalone concentrations cause human teams to deploy synthetic kelp modules reverses the assumed causal direction, positioning abalone density as the cause rather than the effect.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the causal argument in the stem
The biologist proposes a specific causal link: Synthetic kelp modules provide physical shelter from sea otters \rightarrow reduced predation \rightarrow increased juvenile abalone survival.
Understanding the precise mechanism is necessary to evaluate strengthening evidence and causal direction.
2
Evaluate candidate statements for Column 1 (Strengthening the shelter hypothesis)
The statement noting a steep decline in otter-related mortality specifically in module-equipped inlets compared to control inlets directly confirms the proposed predator-shelter mechanism, strengthening the biologist's conclusion.
Demonstrating that the specific hypothesized mediator (reduced otter predation) occurred exclusively where the treatment was applied confirms the causal pathway.
3
Evaluate candidate statements for Column 2 (Causal direction reversal)
The statement explaining that higher pre-existing abalone densities prompt technicians to place synthetic kelp modules in those locations turns the causal arrow around: Abalone DensityKelp PlacementAbalone\ Density \rightarrow Kelp\ Placement instead of Kelp PlacementAbalone DensityKelp\ Placement \rightarrow Abalone\ Density.
Causal direction reversal occurs when the assumed effect is actually the cause driving the assumed intervention.

Anahtar Kavram

Two-Part Causal Analysis and Direction Reversal
Soru 53Soru

An agricultural research team investigated an outbreak of fungal root rot in crop fields following the application of a microbial bio-fertilizer. The team hypothesized a specific causal sequence: microbes in the fertilizer produce high concentrations of organic acids, these organic acids degrade root cell membranes, and the damaged membranes subsequently allow opportunistic fungal pathogens to infect the root system.

Which of the following findings, if true, would support the team's proposed causal sequence? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Root membrane degradation occurred consistently prior to fungal penetration, and synthetic exposure to organic acids alone produced identical membrane damage in pathogen-free environments.; Application of broad-spectrum fungicides successfully eliminated fungal spores but failed to reduce the severity of root membrane degradation in fields treated with the bio-fertilizer.

Cevap

The statements confirming that membrane degradation precedes fungal entry (and is inducible by organic acids alone) and that fungicide treatment fails to prevent membrane degradation both support the proposed causal sequence.
The hypothesis posits a sequential causal chain: bio-fertilizer microbes produce organic acid, organic acid damages root membranes, and damaged membranes permit fungal infection. The statement establishing that organic acid alone induces membrane degradation prior to fungal presence confirms the mechanism and sequence. The statement showing that eliminating fungi leaves membrane damage intact confirms that membrane damage is an independent precursor, not a symptom of fungal infection.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the proposed causal chain in the stem
Microbial bio-fertilizer -> Organic acid production -> Root membrane degradation -> Fungal infection penetration.
To evaluate support for a causal hypothesis, each step in the chain must be tested for correct temporal order and independence.
2
Evaluate statements testing the cause-and-effect sequence
Demonstrating that organic acids cause membrane damage without fungi present confirms the intermediate mechanism. Showing that eliminating fungi does not prevent membrane damage proves membrane damage occurs upstream of fungal infection.
Both findings validate that organic acid damage is the cause, not the effect, of fungal invasion.
3
Identify and eliminate causal reversals and irrelevant scope options
Options claiming that fungal infection or decay causes microbial growth/acid production reverse the hypothesized causal order. General yield comparisons do not address the causal mechanism.
Reversing cause and effect invalidates the proposed direction of the mechanism.

Anahtar Kavram

Causal Order and Mechanism Validation in Logical Arguments
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
Soru 54Soru

A national logistics enterprise equipped 60 of its fulfillment centers with automated climate-controlled hydration micro-hubs. Over the subsequent 12-month evaluation period, heat-related employee fatigue incidents across these facilities decreased by 35%. Company executives concluded that the installation of the micro-hubs directly caused the reduction in heat-related fatigue incidents. Match each logical role on the left with the statement on the right that best fulfills it.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Statement that most strengthens the executive board's causal conclusion
Statement that provides a confounding alternative explanation for the drop in fatigue incidents
Statement that illustrates a causal direction reversal or selection bias

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The statement strengthening the conclusion matches the observation that fatigue drops occurred exclusively where hubs were actively used compared to delayed control centers. The statement providing an alternative explanation matches the facility-wide ventilation upgrade reducing indoor temperatures. The statement illustrating causal direction reversal matches the selection of facilities based on pre-existing fatigue reductions.
The correct pairings establish precise alignment between logical evaluation roles and empirical statements. Isolating the effect to active intervention sites relative to delayed control sites strengthens a causal claim. Identifying simultaneous environmental upgrades provides a confounding alternative explanation. Pointing out that pre-existing drops in fatigue dictated site selection exposes reverse causality and selection bias.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the core causal claim in the stem.
Cause: Installation of hydration micro-hubs. Effect: 35% reduction in heat-related fatigue incidents.
Evaluating causal arguments requires identifying the explicit cause-and-effect structure asserted by the author.
2
Evaluate the statement strengthening the conclusion.
The statement detailing that fatigue decreased only in facilities actively using micro-hubs while remaining constant in control facilities provides a controlled comparison supporting causation.
A valid control group comparison rules out baseline temporal trends.
3
Evaluate the statement providing an alternative explanation.
The statement mentioning ventilation upgrades that reduced ambient temperatures provides a confounding variable that could explain the drop independently of the micro-hubs.
Alternative explanations weaken causal claims by attributing the effect to an unmanaged variable.
4
Evaluate the statement showing causal reversal/selection bias.
The statement showing hubs were installed because fatigue had already dropped demonstrates that prior fatigue trends caused hub allocation, rather than hub allocation causing the drop.
Selection bias occurs when the outcome variable influences treatment assignment.

Anahtar Kavram

Causal Argument Evaluation & Two-Part Logical Analysis
Soru 55Soru

A chemical laboratory manufactures two liquid formulations: Formulation Alpha, which contains 10%10\% active solute by mass, and Formulation Beta, which contains 40%40\% active solute by mass. A technician needs to prepare a 100-kg100\text{-kg} mixture containing 40%40\% active solute by mass by combining Formulation Alpha, Formulation Beta, and a pure solute additive (100%100\% active solute by mass). The ratio of the mass of Formulation Alpha used to the mass of Formulation Beta used must be 2:12 : 1.

Which of the following correctly identifies the mass of Formulation Alpha used and the mass of Pure Additive used, respectively?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Formulation Alpha: 50 kg; Pure Additive: 25 kg

Cevap

Formulation Alpha: 50 kg; Pure Additive: 25 kg
The correct combination specifies 50 kg50\text{ kg} for Formulation Alpha and 25 kg25\text{ kg} for Pure Additive. This leaves 25 kg25\text{ kg} for Formulation Beta, maintaining the 2:12:1 ratio of Alpha to Beta (50:2550 : 25). The total mass is 50+25+25=100 kg50 + 25 + 25 = 100\text{ kg}, and the total active solute mass is 0.10(50)+0.40(25)+1.00(25)=5+10+25=40 kg0.10(50) + 0.40(25) + 1.00(25) = 5 + 10 + 25 = 40\text{ kg}, exactly 40%40\% of the total mass.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Define variables and establish system equations from the given ratios and constraints.
Let AA, BB, and PP be the masses (in kg) of Formulation Alpha, Formulation Beta, and Pure Additive, respectively. Given A:B=2:1A : B = 2 : 1, we have A=2BA = 2B. The total mass equation is A+B+P=100A + B + P = 100.
Relating the component masses allows substituting A=2BA = 2B into the total mass condition: 2B+B+P=100    3B+P=1002B + B + P = 100 \implies 3B + P = 100.
2
Set up the solute mass balance equation.
Solute content equation: 0.10A+0.40B+1.00P=0.40×100=40 kg0.10A + 0.40B + 1.00P = 0.40 \times 100 = 40\text{ kg}.
Substituting A=2BA = 2B gives 0.10(2B)+0.40B+P=40    0.60B+P=400.10(2B) + 0.40B + P = 40 \implies 0.60B + P = 40.
3
Solve the system of equations for BB, AA, and PP.
Subtracting (0.60B+P=40)(0.60B + P = 40) from (3B+P=100)(3B + P = 100) yields (3B0.60B)=10040    2.4B=60    B=25 kg(3B - 0.60B) = 100 - 40 \implies 2.4B = 60 \implies B = 25\text{ kg}.
With B=25 kgB = 25\text{ kg}, calculate A=2(25)=50 kgA = 2(25) = 50\text{ kg} and P=1003(25)=25 kgP = 100 - 3(25) = 25\text{ kg}.

Anahtar Kavram

Weighted Mixture Ratios and Simultaneous Mass Balance Equations
Soru 56Soru

An urban courier service dispatches two types of electric cargo bikes, Cargo-X and Cargo-Y, for package deliveries. On Monday, a fleet of 3 Cargo-X bikes and 4 Cargo-Y bikes completed a total of 38 package deliveries. On Tuesday, a fleet of 5 Cargo-X bikes and 2 Cargo-Y bikes completed a total of 40 package deliveries. Assuming each bike of a given type completes a constant number of deliveries per day, how many total package deliveries will a combined fleet of 4 Cargo-X bikes and 3 Cargo-Y bikes complete in one day?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 39

Cevap

A combined fleet of 4 Cargo-X bikes and 3 Cargo-Y bikes will complete 39 package deliveries in one day.
Solving the linear system 3x+4y=383x + 4y = 38 and 5x+2y=405x + 2y = 40 gives x=6x = 6 deliveries per Cargo-X bike and y=5y = 5 deliveries per Cargo-Y bike. Substituting these rates into 4x+3y4x + 3y yields 4(6)+3(5)=394(6) + 3(5) = 39 total deliveries.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formulate a system of linear equations representing the delivery totals.
System established: 3x+4y=383x + 4y = 38 and 5x+2y=405x + 2y = 40, where xx and yy represent the daily delivery capacities of Cargo-X and Cargo-Y bikes.
Translates contextual problem statements into quantitative algebraic equations.
2
Solve the system using elimination or substitution.
x=6x = 6 deliveries per Cargo-X bike and y=5y = 5 deliveries per Cargo-Y bike.
Determines the exact rate per vehicle type.
3
Evaluate the target linear combination 4x+3y4x + 3y.
4(6)+3(5)=394(6) + 3(5) = 39.
Computes the total capacity for the requested fleet combination.

Anahtar Kavram

Solving systems of simultaneous linear equations in two variables
Soru 57Soru

A cloud computing facility operates four server clusters—Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta—each processing data tasks at a constant rate while consuming electrical energy. Following a infrastructure optimization, each cluster undergoes modifications to its task processing rate and energy consumption:

- Cluster Alpha: Originally processes 12,000 tasks/hr12,000\text{ tasks/hr} using 60 kWh60\text{ kWh} of energy. After optimization, its task processing rate increases by 25%25\% while its energy consumption decreases by 20%20\%.
- Cluster Beta: Originally processes 16,000 tasks/hr16,000\text{ tasks/hr} using 80 kWh80\text{ kWh} of energy. After optimization, its task processing rate increases by 15%15\% while its energy consumption decreases by 8%8\%.
- Cluster Gamma: Originally processes 20,000 tasks/hr20,000\text{ tasks/hr} using 100 kWh100\text{ kWh} of energy. After optimization, its task processing rate increases by 8%8\% while its energy consumption decreases by 10%10\%.
- Cluster Delta: Originally processes 25,000 tasks/hr25,000\text{ tasks/hr} using 125 kWh125\text{ kWh} of energy. After optimization, its task processing rate increases by 12%12\% while its energy consumption decreases by 20%20\%.

Match each server cluster to its corresponding post-optimization efficiency metrics (new task processing rate and energy efficiency ratio in tasks per kWh).

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Cluster Alpha
Cluster Beta
Cluster Gamma
Cluster Delta

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Cluster Alpha matches with 15,000 tasks/hr15,000\text{ tasks/hr} and 312.5 tasks/kWh312.5\text{ tasks/kWh}; Cluster Beta matches with 18,400 tasks/hr18,400\text{ tasks/hr} and 250 tasks/kWh250\text{ tasks/kWh}; Cluster Gamma matches with 21,600 tasks/hr21,600\text{ tasks/hr} and 240 tasks/kWh240\text{ tasks/kWh}; Cluster Delta matches with 28,000 tasks/hr28,000\text{ tasks/hr} and 280 tasks/kWh280\text{ tasks/kWh}.
Each cluster's new task processing rate and new power consumption must be computed independently using their respective growth and reduction multipliers. Dividing the new rate by the new power gives the exact post-optimization efficiency ratio in tasks per kWh for each cluster.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Calculate the updated task processing rate for each cluster by applying the respective percentage increase factor.
Rate_Alpha = 12,000×(1+0.25)=15,000 tasks/hr12,000 \times (1 + 0.25) = 15,000\text{ tasks/hr}; Rate_Beta = 16,000×(1+0.15)=18,400 tasks/hr16,000 \times (1 + 0.15) = 18,400\text{ tasks/hr}; Rate_Gamma = 20,000×(1+0.08)=21,600 tasks/hr20,000 \times (1 + 0.08) = 21,600\text{ tasks/hr}; Rate_Delta = 25,000×(1+0.12)=28,000 tasks/hr25,000 \times (1 + 0.12) = 28,000\text{ tasks/hr}.
An increase of p%p\% modifies the original quantity by a factor of (1+p100)(1 + \frac{p}{100}).
2
Calculate the updated energy consumption (kWh) for each cluster by applying the respective percentage reduction factor.
Power_Alpha = 60×(10.20)=48 kWh60 \times (1 - 0.20) = 48\text{ kWh}; Power_Beta = 80×(10.08)=73.6 kWh80 \times (1 - 0.08) = 73.6\text{ kWh}; Power_Gamma = 100×(10.10)=90 kWh100 \times (1 - 0.10) = 90\text{ kWh}; Power_Delta = 125×(10.20)=100 kWh125 \times (1 - 0.20) = 100\text{ kWh}.
A decrease of d%d\% modifies the original energy usage by a factor of (1d100)(1 - \frac{d}{100}).
3
Compute the new power efficiency ratio (tasks per kWh) for each cluster by dividing its new task processing rate by its new energy consumption.
Eff_Alpha = 15,00048=312.5 tasks/kWh\frac{15,000}{48} = 312.5\text{ tasks/kWh}; Eff_Beta = 18,40073.6=250 tasks/kWh\frac{18,400}{73.6} = 250\text{ tasks/kWh}; Eff_Gamma = 21,60090=240 tasks/kWh\frac{21,600}{90} = 240\text{ tasks/kWh}; Eff_Delta = 28,000100=280 tasks/kWh\frac{28,000}{100} = 280\text{ tasks/kWh}.
Efficiency is defined as output rate per unit of energy consumed.
4
Pair each server cluster to its corresponding output description.
Cluster Alpha pairs with 15,000 tasks/hr15,000\text{ tasks/hr} (312.5 tasks/kWh312.5\text{ tasks/kWh}); Cluster Beta pairs with 18,400 tasks/hr18,400\text{ tasks/hr} (250 tasks/kWh250\text{ tasks/kWh}); Cluster Gamma pairs with 21,600 tasks/hr21,600\text{ tasks/hr} (240 tasks/kWh240\text{ tasks/kWh}); Cluster Delta pairs with 28,000 tasks/hr28,000\text{ tasks/hr} (280 tasks/kWh280\text{ tasks/kWh}).
Matching calculated values directly to the corresponding right-side item options.

Anahtar Kavram

Ratios, Rates, and Multi-step Percentage Modifications
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
Soru 58Soru

A water processing facility processes liquid batches through a three-stage sequential system. The system updates the batch pollutant count (NN) according to the following state transition rules at each stage:

- Stage 1 (Filtration): N1=N0+20N_1 = N_0 + 20
- Stage 2 (Purification): N2=2×N1N_2 = 2 \times N_1
- Stage 3 (Polishing): N3=N210N_3 = N_2 - 10

Match each initial pollutant count (N0N_0) on the left to its corresponding final pollutant count (N3N_3) after completing all three stages.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Initial Count N0=10N_0 = 10
Initial Count N0=25N_0 = 25
Initial Count N0=40N_0 = 40

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Initial Count N0=10N_0 = 10 matches Final Count N3=50N_3 = 50; Initial Count N0=25N_0 = 25 matches Final Count N3=80N_3 = 80; Initial Count N0=40N_0 = 40 matches Final Count N3=110N_3 = 110.
Each initial count must be processed sequentially through all three transition rules in exact order: N1=N0+20N_1 = N_0 + 20, then N2=2×N1N_2 = 2 \times N_1, and finally N3=N210N_3 = N_2 - 10. Executing this sequence accurately matches N0=10N_0 = 10 to N3=50N_3 = 50, N0=25N_0 = 25 to N3=80N_3 = 80, and N0=40N_0 = 40 to N3=110N_3 = 110.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Apply Stage 1 transition rule (N1=N0+20N_1 = N_0 + 20) to each initial value.
For N0=10N1=30N_0 = 10 \rightarrow N_1 = 30; for N0=25N1=45N_0 = 25 \rightarrow N_1 = 45; for N0=40N1=60N_0 = 40 \rightarrow N_1 = 60.
Stage 1 adds 20 to the initial state.
2
Apply Stage 2 transition rule (N2=2×N1N_2 = 2 \times N_1) to the intermediate values.
For N1=30N2=60N_1 = 30 \rightarrow N_2 = 60; for N1=45N2=90N_1 = 45 \rightarrow N_2 = 90; for N1=60N2=120N_1 = 60 \rightarrow N_2 = 120.
Stage 2 doubles the state value from Stage 1.
3
Apply Stage 3 transition rule (N3=N210N_3 = N_2 - 10) to determine final output states.
For N2=60N3=50N_2 = 60 \rightarrow N_3 = 50; for N2=90N3=80N_2 = 90 \rightarrow N_3 = 80; for N2=120N3=110N_2 = 120 \rightarrow N_3 = 110.
Stage 3 subtracts 10 from the Stage 2 state value.

Anahtar Kavram

Sequential processes require evaluating state updates iteratively in strict order, carrying the output of each stage into the next stage.
Soru 59Soru

An urban planning board evaluated a two-year trial of intelligent adaptive street lighting across 50 municipal districts. Districts equipped with the adaptive lighting recorded a 30% reduction in electrical power consumption and a concurrent 15% decrease in nighttime pedestrian accidents. Critics of the initiative argue that the reduction in pedestrian accidents was not caused by the improved visibility from adaptive lighting, but rather by a simultaneous increase in police foot patrols deployed in those same districts during the trial period.

Which of the following joint selections correctly pairs one statement that, if true, most strongly supports the critics' argument with one statement that, if true, most strongly weakens the critics' argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Supports Critics: Nighttime pedestrian accidents decreased exclusively during hours when police foot patrols were actively present on the streets. | Weakens Critics: Districts that received an identical increase in police foot patrols but no adaptive lighting upgrades saw no reduction in nighttime pedestrian accidents.

Cevap

The option selecting 'Supports Critics: Nighttime pedestrian accidents decreased exclusively during hours when police foot patrols were actively present on the streets' paired with 'Weakens Critics: Districts that received an identical increase in police foot patrols but no adaptive lighting upgrades saw no reduction in nighttime pedestrian accidents.'
The correct answer provides a valid supporting statement and a valid weakening statement for the critics' argument. The statement indicating that accidents dropped exclusively during active patrol hours strengthens the claim that patrols were responsible for the drop. The statement showing that control districts with increased patrols but no new lighting saw no accident reduction isolates the patrol variable, demonstrating that patrols alone did not cause the decrease and thereby weakening the critics' argument.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the critics' causal argument
Critics claim that Increased Police Foot Patrols → Lower Pedestrian Accidents (and that Adaptive Lighting is not the true cause).
To support the critics, a statement must show that police patrols are directly tied to the accident decline. To weaken the critics, a statement must show police patrols did not cause the decline (or that lighting did).
2
Evaluate candidate statements for supporting the critics
The statement asserting that accidents dropped exclusively during active patrol hours ties the effect strictly to police presence, strongly supporting the critics' claim.
Showing tight temporal concurrency between the candidate cause and the effect strengthens a causal link.
3
Evaluate candidate statements for weakening the critics
The statement showing that control districts with increased patrols but no lighting upgrades experienced no accident reduction isolates the police variable and demonstrates it was insufficient to cause the effect.
If the proposed cause (patrols) occurs without the effect (accident reduction) in control settings, the causal hypothesis is weakened.

Anahtar Kavram

Causal Arguments and Controlled Variable Isolation in Two-Part Analysis
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 60Soru

A luxury boutique hotel offers two types of guest accommodations: Deluxe Suites and Executive Suites. On a busy Saturday, housekeeping spends 45 minutes cleaning each Deluxe Suite and 75 minutes cleaning each Executive Suite, accumulating a total of 38 hours of cleaning time. On the same day, laundry services supply 4 sets of premium towels for each Deluxe Suite and 7 sets of premium towels for each Executive Suite, delivering a total of 208 towel sets. Which of the following correctly pairs the number of Deluxe Suites cleaned with the number of Executive Suites cleaned on that day?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Deluxe Suites = 24; Executive Suites = 16

Cevap

Deluxe Suites = 24; Executive Suites = 16
Solving the simultaneous system of linear equations 3d+5e=1523d + 5e = 152 and 4d+7e=2084d + 7e = 208 yields d=24d = 24 Deluxe Suites and e=16e = 16 Executive Suites. The choice indicating 24 Deluxe Suites and 16 Executive Suites correctly matches these calculated values to their respective variables.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Define variables and convert cleaning time to minutes.
Let dd be the number of Deluxe Suites and ee be the number of Executive Suites. Total cleaning time = 38 hours×60 minutes/hour=2280 minutes38 \text{ hours} \times 60 \text{ minutes/hour} = 2280 \text{ minutes}.
Units must be consistent across variables before setting up algebraic equations.
2
Formulate the linear equations system.
Equation (1) [Cleaning time]: 45d+75e=228045d + 75e = 2280
Equation (2) [Towel sets]: 4d+7e=2084d + 7e = 208
Translates the real-world operational constraints into simultaneous linear algebraic equations.
3
Simplify Equation (1) by dividing all terms by 15.
3d+5e=1523d + 5e = 152
Simplifying coefficients makes simultaneous elimination computationally easier.
4
Solve the system using elimination.
Multiply 3d+5e=1523d + 5e = 152 by 44: 12d+20e=60812d + 20e = 608.
Multiply 4d+7e=2084d + 7e = 208 by 33: 12d+21e=62412d + 21e = 624.
Subtracting the first equation from the second yields: (12d+21e)(12d+20e)=624608e=16(12d + 21e) - (12d + 20e) = 624 - 608 \Rightarrow e = 16.
Eliminates dd to isolate variable ee.
5
Substitute e=16e = 16 back into the simplified Equation (1) to solve for dd.
3d+5(16)=1523d+80=1523d=72d=243d + 5(16) = 152 \Rightarrow 3d + 80 = 152 \Rightarrow 3d = 72 \Rightarrow d = 24.
Determines the value of the second variable dd.

Anahtar Kavram

Setting up and solving a system of two linear equations in two variables
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
ÖncekiSayfa 3 / 7Sonraki
Two-Part Analysis Alıştırma Soruları — GMAT — Sayfa 3 | Examkin