Critical Reasoning

131 soru

Soru 121Soru

Ethologists long maintained that the intense, synchronized flashing of male fireflies in tropical canopies functions primarily as a cooperative signal to attract distant females to the group. However, recent high-speed video analysis demonstrates that individual males adjust their flash timing to obscure the flashes of adjacent rivals. Therefore, the collective synchronization is merely an unintended byproduct of relentless competition among individual males to monopolize female attention. Consequently, models that rely on group-level selection to explain this phenomenon are fundamentally flawed.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The first is a traditional position that the argument seeks to refute; the second is the main conclusion advocated by the argument.

Cevap

The first boldfaced statement is a traditional position that the argument seeks to refute, and the second boldfaced statement is the main conclusion advocated by the argument.
The passage begins by outlining a traditional hypothesis regarding firefly flashing behavior. The author uses contrast transition words ('However') and evidence to undermine this traditional view, concluding ('Therefore') with the main claim in the second boldfaced selection. Thus, the option identifying the first as a position the argument refutes and the second as the main conclusion is correct.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural role of the first boldfaced portion
Identified as the traditional hypothesis ('Ethologists long maintained that...') which the author challenges.
The author introduces a contrast signal ('However') immediately after this statement to present counter-evidence.
2
Analyze the structural role of the second boldfaced portion
Identified as the author's main conclusion ('Therefore, the collective synchronization is merely an unintended byproduct...').
The claim follows the premise evidence regarding flash timing and expresses the core claim that the argument aims to establish.
3
Match the identified roles to the corresponding answer choice
Selected the option describing the first as a position the argument refutes and the second as the main conclusion.
This option accurately captures the rhetorical relationship between the opposing background view and the author's primary position.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Argument Structure and Boldface Roles
Soru 122Soru

Marine biologists once theorized that the sudden proliferation of deep-sea glass sponge reefs off the Pacific coast was primarily driven by recent changes in ocean water temperature. However, this hypothesis overlooks crucial historical sedimentation data. High-resolution oceanographic core samples demonstrate that these sponge colonies have maintained stable growth cycles for over three millennia, regardless of thermal fluctuations. Because glass sponge structures rely on dissolved silica rather than temperature stability to construct their structural frameworks, the recent expansion is actually attributable to agricultural runoff that boosted coastal silica concentrations.

Which of the following statements accurately describe the structural function of the boldfaced portions in the argument above? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The first boldfaced portion presents a hypothesis that the argument seeks to refute.; The second boldfaced portion states the main conclusion that the overall argument advocates.

Cevap

The correct selections are the statement identifying the first boldfaced portion as a hypothesis the argument seeks to refute, and the statement identifying the second boldfaced portion as the main conclusion advocated by the argument.
The passage begins by presenting a prior theory regarding temperature changes, which the author proceeds to undermine using oceanographic data. Thus, the statement describing the first boldfaced portion as a hypothesis the argument seeks to refute is accurate. The author then presents evidence about glass sponge silicious reliance to conclude that agricultural silica runoff explains the reef expansion; thus, the statement describing the second boldfaced portion as the main conclusion advocated by the argument is also accurate.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main argument flow and identify the role of the first boldfaced segment.
The text states 'Marine biologists once theorized that...', followed by 'However, this hypothesis overlooks...'. Thus, the first boldface portion is an opposing claim/hypothesis being challenged by the author.
The contrast transition 'However' signals that the author disagrees with the initial temperature theory.
2
Analyze the evidence provided and the role of the second boldfaced segment.
The argument uses evidence about core samples and sponge biology to lead up to 'is actually attributable to...'. Thus, the second boldface portion is the author's primary conclusion.
The structural signal 'is actually attributable to' marks the ultimate explanatory claim the author presents.
3
Evaluate the choices against the identified structural roles.
The options accurately describing the first segment as a refuted hypothesis and the second segment as the main conclusion are correct.
They precisely mirror the rhetorical functions identified in steps 1 and 2.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Argument Structure and Boldface Roles
Soru 123Soru

Art conservators attempting to preserve a famous Renaissance oil painting observed severe micro-cracking caused by fluctuations in gallery humidity. To mitigate this without altering the gallery's environmental controls, conservators applied a newly synthesized nano-polymer sealant to test panels, where it successfully formed a moisture-impermeable barrier and prevented structural deformation under simulated humidity shifts. The conservators conclude that applying this sealant to the Renaissance painting will effectively protect it from further humidity-induced micro-cracking. Which of the following is an assumption on which the conservators' conclusion depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The chemical interaction between the original paint layers of the Renaissance painting and the nano-polymer sealant will not degrade the sealant's moisture-impermeable barrier over time.

Cevap

The argument depends on the assumption that chemical interactions between the Renaissance painting's paint layers and the nano-polymer sealant will not degrade the sealant's moisture barrier over time.
The conclusion asserts that applying the sealant to the painting will protect it based on success with test panels. For this transfer of results to hold, the painting's specific chemical composition must not degrade the sealant's core functional property (its moisture barrier). Negating this assumption breaks the logical bridge from test panel success to actual painting protection.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument structure (premises and conclusion)
Premise: Micro-cracking is caused by humidity shifts. Premise: Nano-polymer sealant formed an impermeable barrier on test panels and prevented damage during humidity shifts. Conclusion: Applying the sealant to the Renaissance painting will protect it from further humidity-induced micro-cracking.
Isolating the gap between test panel performance and actual application on the historical artwork reveals missing assumptions.
2
Apply the Negation Test to candidate assumptions
Negating the statement that chemical interactions will not degrade the sealant yields: 'Chemical interactions between the paint layers and sealant WILL degrade the sealant's barrier.'
If the barrier degrades upon contact with the painting's specific paint layers, the sealant cannot protect the painting, causing the conclusion to fall apart completely.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Necessary Assumptions using the Negation Test
Soru 124Soru

Ecologists observed that in coastal pine forests where native beetle populations recently declined, a species of parasitic fungus began infecting over 40 percent of mature pine trees. The ecologists hypothesized that the beetle larvae, which burrow into pine bark, deposit a chemical secretion that inhibits fungal spore germination, thereby protecting the trees from infection.

Which of the following findings, if true, would provide support for the ecologists' hypothesis? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Laboratory tests confirm that synthetic versions of the chemical secretion produced by beetle larvae inhibit fungal spore germination at concentrations typical in pine bark.; In nearby coastal pine forests where beetle larvae populations remained stable, fungal infection rates among mature pine trees were significantly lower than 40 percent.

Cevap

The argument is strengthened by demonstrating that the larval secretion actively inhibits fungal germination in controlled laboratory conditions and by showing that forests retaining stable beetle populations maintained lower fungal infection rates.
The argument proposes a causal mechanism: beetle larvae protect trees from fungal infection via an inhibitory chemical secretion. The statement verifying that the larval secretion chemically inhibits fungal germination in lab tests directly confirms the plausibility of this mechanism. Additionally, the statement observing lower infection rates in forests with stable beetle populations provides control data showing that beetle presence correlates with protection from the fungus.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core conclusion and proposed mechanism
Conclusion/Hypothesis: Beetle larvae protect pine trees because their chemical secretion inhibits fungal spore germination.
Strengthening questions require finding statements that increase the likelihood that this specific mechanism is correct.
2
Evaluate empirical verification of the causal agent
The finding confirming that synthetic larval secretion inhibits fungal spore germination at typical bark concentrations provides direct experimental support for the proposed biological mechanism.
Validating that the biological agent possesses the requisite chemical property confirms a critical underlying assumption.
3
Evaluate comparative control evidence
The finding that forests with stable beetle populations maintained significantly lower infection rates serves as comparative control data.
Showing that the effect (low fungal infection) persists where the cause (beetle larvae) remains active reinforces the causal connection.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Arguments via Mechanism Validation and Comparative Controls
Soru 125Soru

To alleviate traffic congestion during peak hours, municipal officials implemented a high-occupancy toll lane system on a major arterial highway, charging single-occupant vehicles a variable toll while allowing carpools free access. Eight months after implementation, average commute times along the highway corridor decreased by 14 percent. City administrators concluded that the toll policy successfully motivated solo drivers to switch to carpooling.

Which of the following statements, if true, provide support for the city administrators' conclusion? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Commuter surveys conducted six months after the policy launch revealed a significant increase in the average number of passengers per private vehicle traveling on the highway during peak hours.; Regional transportation records show a sharp increase in shared ride-matching app registrations paired with origin-destination data confirming increased shared vehicle trips along the highway corridor.

Cevap

The statements confirming an increase in average vehicle occupancy during peak hours and documenting a sharp rise in shared vehicle trips along the highway corridor both strengthen the argument.
The conclusion asserts that the toll policy caused commute times to drop by encouraging single drivers to carpool. Evidence showing increased average passenger counts per vehicle during peak hours directly validates that carpooling increased. Similarly, data showing higher shared ride-matching app registrations and verified shared trips along the corridor directly supports the proposed causal link between the policy and commuter carpooling behavior.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and underlying causal claim.
Conclusion: The high-occupancy toll policy successfully motivated solo drivers to switch to carpooling, causing the 14% decrease in commute times.
To strengthen a causal conclusion, evidence must either confirm the proposed mechanism or rule out alternative causes.
2
Evaluate option choices for direct support or corroborating data.
The statement regarding higher passenger counts per vehicle confirms that carpooling increased. The statement detailing increased shared ride registrations and trips along the corridor confirms that commuters actively transitioned to shared rides on that highway.
Both findings directly confirm the central mechanism assumed by the conclusion.
3
Evaluate incorrect options for alternative causes or irrelevancy.
Parallel lane expansion and widespread remote work offer alternative causes for lower traffic, which weakens the conclusion. Toll revenue collection is irrelevant to commuter transit choices.
Statements that introduce confounding causes undermine the author's claim.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Arguments
Soru 126Soru

A 10-year study of five municipal districts revealed that districts implementing mandatory minimum canopy coverage regulations for private developments maintained higher overall tree diversity than districts relying solely on public park planting initiatives. However, among the districts with mandatory regulations, those that permitted developers to pay in-lieu fee payments into a centralized forestry fund rather than planting trees on-site experienced a net decrease in total canopy acreage over the decade. Conversely, every district that prohibited in-lieu fee payments and required on-site planting saw an increase in total canopy acreage, though two such districts recorded a decline in species diversity due to developer reliance on a single resilient maple species.

Based on the information above, which of the following statements must be true? Consider each of the choices separately and select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: At least one district in the study experienced both an increase in total canopy acreage and a decline in species diversity.; At least one district implementing mandatory minimum canopy coverage regulations experienced a net decrease in total canopy acreage.

Cevap

The statements asserting that at least one district experienced both an increase in canopy acreage and a decline in species diversity, and that at least one district with mandatory regulations experienced a net decrease in canopy acreage, must both be true.
Both valid statements follow unavoidably from explicit passage statements. The claim that at least one district experienced both an acreage increase and a diversity decline is proven by the reference to two districts that required on-site planting (yielding increased acreage) while recording a decline in species diversity. The claim that at least one mandatory-regulation district experienced an acreage decrease is proven by the explicit statement that mandatory-regulation districts permitting in-lieu fees suffered a net acreage decrease.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the premises regarding districts that prohibited in-lieu fee payments.
All districts prohibiting in-lieu fees experienced an increase in canopy acreage, and two of these districts also experienced a decline in species diversity.
This establishes that at least one district exhibited both traits simultaneously.
2
Analyze the premises regarding districts with mandatory regulations.
Districts permitting in-lieu fees fall under mandatory regulations and suffered a net decrease in canopy acreage.
This confirms that at least one mandatory-regulation district experienced a net decrease in canopy acreage.
3
Evaluate unstated claims regarding public park planting initiatives.
The text evaluates public park initiatives on tree diversity only, leaving acreage growth unmentioned.
Claims about public park acreage growth cannot be logically deduced from the passage facts alone.

Anahtar Kavram

Drawing Valid Inferences from Quantified and Subset Premises
Soru 127Soru

A regional logistics firm installed real-time thermal monitoring sensors on its refrigerated delivery fleet to reduce perishable food spoilage during long-distance transport. During a six-month trial, fleet vehicles equipped with these sensors experienced a 35 percent reduction in cargo spoilage compared to unequipped vehicles operating on identical routes. The operations manager concluded that real-time temperature alerts directly prevented spoilage by enabling drivers to adjust cooling settings immediately upon detecting system malfunctions.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the operations manager's conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Vehicles equipped with the thermal sensors experienced mechanical refrigeration failures at the exact same rate as unequipped vehicles during the trial period.

Cevap

The statement showing that sensor-equipped vehicles experienced mechanical refrigeration failures at the exact same rate as unequipped vehicles.
The conclusion asserts a direct causal link: real-time thermal alerts caused a reduction in spoilage by allowing drivers to intervene. A classic way to strengthen a causal claim is to rule out alternative explanations. If sensor-equipped trucks suffered mechanical refrigeration failures at the exact same rate as unequipped trucks, the lower spoilage in the sensor group cannot be attributed to fewer baseline mechanical breakdowns. Eliminating this confounder significantly reinforces the manager's conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument into premise and conclusion.
Premise: Sensor-equipped trucks had 35% less cargo spoilage on identical routes. Conclusion: Sensor alerts directly caused the reduction by letting drivers fix cooling issues immediately.
Identifying the explicit conclusion isolates the causal claim that must be supported.
2
Identify potential logical gaps or alternative explanations.
An alternative explanation could be that the sensor-equipped trucks were simply newer or broke down less often than unequipped trucks.
To strengthen a causal argument, ruling out plausible alternative causes reinforces the proposed cause.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the one that eliminates an alternative cause or validates the causal mechanism.
Confirming that mechanical breakdown rates were identical across both groups eliminates the possibility that fewer breakdowns accounted for the lower spoilage, leaving driver intervention via alerts as the primary cause.
Ruling out alternative explanations directly increases the likelihood that the author's stated conclusion is correct.

Anahtar Kavram

Ruling Out Alternative Causes in Causal Arguments
Tahmini Süre:1m 40s
Soru 128Soru

Recent archival research on fourteenth-century Venetian merchant fleets indicates that any galley authorized to carry high-value spices was required to maintain a double-hulled structure and employ a certified chief navigator. Furthermore, all vessels with double-hulled structures were subjected to biannual naval inspections by the Venetian Maritime Council, whereas single-hulled vessels underwent inspections only quadrennially. Records show that during the decade from 1340 to 1350, no galley that underwent biannual naval inspections experienced hull breach incidents resulting in cargo loss. However, several spice-carrying galleys lost cargo during this decade due to severe weather conditions.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: None of the cargo losses suffered by spice-carrying galleys between 1340 and 1350 were the result of hull breaches.

Cevap

None of the cargo losses suffered by spice-carrying galleys between 1340 and 1350 were the result of hull breaches.
The passage presents a deductive chain: all spice-carrying galleys had double hulls, and all double-hulled vessels underwent biannual inspections. Consequently, every spice-carrying galley was subject to biannual inspections. For the period between 1340 and 1350, the passage guarantees that zero galleys with biannual inspections lost cargo due to hull breaches. Therefore, any spice-carrying galley that lost cargo during severe weather in that decade must have done so via mechanisms other than a hull breach.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Chain the conditional premises given in the passage.
Being a spice-carrying galley implies having a double-hulled structure, which in turn implies undergoing biannual naval inspections. Therefore, every spice-carrying galley underwent biannual naval inspections.
Establishing the relationship between spice-carrying galleys and inspection frequency is necessary to evaluate the period from 1340 to 1350.
2
Apply the decade-specific fact to spice-carrying galleys.
Between 1340 and 1350, no galley undergoing biannual inspections experienced cargo loss from hull breaches. Thus, no spice-carrying galley experienced cargo loss from hull breaches during that decade.
Since all spice-carrying galleys were biannually inspected, the restriction on hull breach cargo losses applies to all spice-carrying galleys.
3
Reconcile with the fact that several spice-carrying galleys lost cargo during severe weather in that decade.
The weather-related cargo losses on spice-carrying galleys between 1340 and 1350 must have occurred without hull breaches.
If any of those weather-related losses had involved a hull breach, it would violate the premise that no biannually inspected galley suffered cargo loss from hull breaches.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive inference using nested conditional rules and set inclusion.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 129Soru

Urban planners monitored residential neighborhoods that planted dense rows of broadleaf deciduous trees along high-traffic arterial avenues. Over a five-year period, these neighborhoods experienced a 14 percent reduction in ambient daytime temperatures and a significant decrease in heat-related emergency room admissions compared to adjacent neighborhoods that installed reflective cool roofs. The planners concluded that the temperature reduction achieved by the tree canopies was directly responsible for the decline in heat-related emergency room visits. Which of the following statements, if true, provide additional support for the urban planners' conclusion? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The decline in heat-related emergency room admissions in tree-canopied neighborhoods occurred almost exclusively during peak afternoon hours when canopy shade and transpiration produced their greatest cooling effect.; Household air-conditioning capacity and resident access to emergency healthcare services remained equivalent across all studied neighborhoods throughout the five-year evaluation.

Cevap

The argument is strengthened both by establishing that emergency room visit declines coincided precisely with the peak hours of canopy cooling and by confirming that confounding factors like indoor air conditioning and healthcare access were equal across all neighborhoods.
The correct selections strengthen the argument in two complementary ways. First, showing that emergency room reductions occurred specifically during peak afternoon hours aligns the timing of the effect with the timing of maximum canopy cooling, reinforcing the causal link. Second, confirming that air-conditioning access and medical availability were uniform across neighborhoods rules out major potential confounding variables, ensuring the cooling effect itself accounts for the outcome.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core argument structure
Premise: Tree-canopied neighborhoods saw lower ambient temperatures and fewer heat-related ER visits than cool-roof neighborhoods. Conclusion: The canopy's cooling effect caused the decrease in heat-related ER visits.
Isolating the premise and conclusion clarifies the causal claim that must be strengthened.
2
Evaluate statements for strengthening mechanisms
Confirming that health improvements happened precisely when cooling was highest strengthens the causal link. Ruling out alternative explanations (such as baseline differences in air conditioning or healthcare access) confirms that the cooling effect was the decisive factor.
Causal conclusions are strengthened when alternate causes are eliminated or when precise dose-response timing is verified.
3
Eliminate options that weaken or introduce irrelevant information
Options introducing demographic shifts or installation noise provide alternative causes for the outcome difference (weakening the argument), while winter leaf shedding is irrelevant to summer heat emergencies.
Distractors often present alternate explanations or out-of-scope facts.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Causal Arguments
Soru 130Soru

Agricultural researchers monitored tomato farms in a semi-arid region that adopted satellite-guided automated drip irrigation systems. Over three harvest seasons, farms utilizing the automated system reported a 25 percent reduction in water usage alongside a 15 percent increase in crop yields compared to their previous yields under manual drip irrigation. The researchers concluded that the automated system's precise real-time adjustments to soil moisture levels were directly responsible for the increased crop yields.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the researchers' argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Tomato farms in the same region that maintained manual drip irrigation over the three harvest seasons saw no increase in crop yields despite experiencing identical weather patterns.

Cevap

The argument is most strengthened by the finding that neighboring tomato farms retaining manual drip irrigation experienced no yield increase under identical weather conditions.
The correct answer provides a control comparison. By establishing that farms in the same region using manual irrigation under identical weather conditions saw no yield increase, it rules out external factors like favorable weather or climate shifts, thereby strongly supporting the claim that the automated system was the cause of the increased yields.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument into premise and conclusion.
Premise: Farms using satellite-guided automated drip irrigation reduced water use by 25% and increased yield by 15% relative to their past manual drip baseline. Conclusion: The automated system's real-time soil moisture adjustments directly caused the yield increase.
Identifying the explicit causal claim is necessary to determine what evidence is required to reinforce it.
2
Identify potential vulnerabilities in the causal reasoning.
The argument assumes that no unobserved external factors (such as favorable weather, fertilizer improvements, or pest reduction) were responsible for the yield increase during those three seasons.
Strengthening a causal argument frequently involves providing a control group or ruling out plausible alternative causes.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the statement that eliminates alternative causes.
The observation that regional farms keeping manual systems experienced no yield increase under identical weather confirms that regional environmental factors alone do not explain the yield gains, isolating the automated system as the key variable.
Providing counterfactual evidence strengthens the probability that the author's stated cause is correct.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Causal Claims via Control Groups and Alternative Cause Elimination
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 131Soru

Researchers analyzing high-altitude bristlecone pine growth rings in the White Mountains observed a sudden, sharp contraction in tree-ring width dating precisely to 536 CE. Historical records from the Mediterranean basin during the same decade describe several years of dimmed sunlight and summer frosts. The researchers concluded that a major volcanic eruption in 536 CE ejected massive sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere, blocking solar radiation and causing global cooling that restricted tree growth. Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the researchers' conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Polar ice core samples retrieved from layers dated to 536 CE contain unprecedentedly high concentrations of atmospheric volcanic sulfate deposits.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that polar ice core samples from 536 CE contain unprecedentedly high concentrations of atmospheric volcanic sulfate deposits.
The correct answer provides direct physical proof of massive atmospheric volcanic aerosols precisely in 536 CE from independent ice core data. This strongly reinforces the conclusion that a volcanic eruption was the cause of both the Mediterranean atmospheric phenomenon and the tree-ring growth contraction.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument into premise and conclusion.
Premise 1: Sharp narrowing of tree rings in 536 CE. Premise 2: Mediterranean historical records report dimmed sunlight/frosts in 536 CE. Conclusion: A major volcanic eruption in 536 CE caused global stratospheric cooling that restricted tree growth.
Identifying the gap between observed evidence (tree rings, dimmed sun) and the proposed cause (volcanic eruption) is essential for evaluating strengthening statements.
2
Identify what evidence would strengthen the causal claim.
Direct physical evidence confirming an eruption occurred in 536 CE, or ruling out alternative causes for the tree-ring contraction.
Strengthening questions require corroborating the specific mechanism or cause proposed by the author.
3
Evaluate the choices against the required strengthening effect.
Finding volcanic sulfate deposits in polar ice cores dated to 536 CE provides independent, direct physical verification of a global volcanic eruption in that exact year.
This confirms the unstated physical bridge between the tree-ring anomaly and the hypothesized volcanic cause.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Causal Claims via Independent Physical Corroboration
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
ÖncekiSayfa 7 / 7
Critical Reasoning Alıştırma Soruları — GRE General Test — Sayfa 7 | Examkin