Weakening Arguments

27 soru

Archaeologists analyzing a 4th-century BCE Mediterranean shipwreck discovered that all preserved ceramic transport amphorae contained interior traces of pinaceous resin, a substance traditionally used to seal vessel walls against liquid seepage. Because pinaceous resin was significantly more expensive than clay-based sealant alternatives during this era, researchers concluded that the ship's cargo consisted exclusively of high-value luxury wines intended for wealthy buyers, rather than common staples like fish sauce or olive oil. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researchers' conclusion?

Pinaceous resin was uniquely effective at neutralizing acidic compounds in fish sauce that would otherwise dissolve clay sealants during long voyages.

Contemporary historical registries record that luxury wines exported across the Mediterranean were almost universally packaged in resin-sealed ceramic containers.

Terrestrial excavation sites from the 5th century BCE show that domestic wine storage vessels rarely utilized pinaceous resin sealants.

The shipwreck was located along a trade route primarily utilized by merchant vessels transporting bulk agricultural goods.

Pinaceous resin harvested in the northern Mediterranean was traded extensively throughout neighboring coastal settlements.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Pinaceous resin was uniquely effective at neutralizing acidic compounds in fish sauce that would otherwise dissolve clay sealants during long voyages.

Cevap

The argument is most weakened by the finding that pinaceous resin was uniquely required to neutralize acidic compounds in fish sauce during long maritime voyages, demonstrating a functional necessity for common goods rather than an indicator of luxury cargo.

The conclusion relies on the assumption that expensive pinaceous resin was chosen strictly to match the high value of luxury wine. The statement regarding fish sauce acidity demonstrates that resin was a chemical necessity for preserving container integrity when transporting fish sauce across sea routes. By showing that cheaper alternatives would fail chemically, this option breaks the assumed link between expensive packaging and high-value cargo, thereby severely weakening the argument.

Adım Adım Çözüm

Deconstruct the core argument

Premise: Ceramic amphorae on a 4th-century BCE shipwreck were lined with pinaceous resin, which was far more expensive than clay sealants. Conclusion: The cargo was exclusively high-value luxury wine rather than standard staples like fish sauce or olive oil.

Identifying the author's underlying assumption—that expensive sealant was used only because the contents themselves were high-value.

Evaluate the vulnerability of the assumption

The argument assumes there is no non-monetary or functional reason to use expensive resin for lower-value staples.

To weaken a causal or motivational claim, an alternative explanation for using the expensive sealant must be established.

Assess the correct choice against the vulnerability

If fish sauce contains acidic compounds that destroy cheaper clay sealants on long voyages, merchants were required to use resin regardless of the low market value of fish sauce.

This directly undermines the claim that resin lining proves the presence of luxury wine.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening Arguments by Providing Alternative Explanations for Evidence

Soru 22Soru →

To reduce peak summer energy demand, municipal planners in Ardenton mandated high-albedo reflective roof coatings for all commercial warehouses. In trial runs, warehouses with these coatings experienced a 20 percent drop in interior roof-level temperatures, leading to a 15 percent decrease in air-conditioning energy consumption. City officials now conclude that extending this mandate to all single-family residential homes will achieve a similar 15 percent reduction in total residential cooling energy consumption during summer months.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the city officials' conclusion?

Installing reflective roof coatings on residential homes requires specialized safety equipment that increases upfront application costs relative to commercial warehouse installations.

Residential air-conditioning units in Ardenton consume significantly more electricity per degree of interior temperature reduction than commercial cooling systems do.

The vast majority of single-family residential roofs in Ardenton are heavily shaded throughout the summer by dense, mature tree canopies.

Residential energy consumption for space heating during winter months in Ardenton has increased steadily over the past decade.

Commercial warehouses in Ardenton account for a larger proportion of the city's total peak summer electricity usage than single-family residential homes do.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The vast majority of single-family residential roofs in Ardenton are heavily shaded throughout the summer by dense, mature tree canopies.

Cevap

The statement that the vast majority of single-family residential roofs in Ardenton are heavily shaded throughout the summer by dense, mature tree canopies.

The argument relies on an underlying assumption that single-family residential roofs exposure to sunlight is functionally similar to that of commercial warehouses. High-albedo reflective coatings work by reflecting direct solar radiation away from a structure. If single-family residential roofs are heavily shaded by dense tree canopies, direct sunlight does not hit the roofs in significant quantities. Consequently, applying reflective coatings will yield negligible temperature drops and fail to achieve the predicted 15 percent energy reduction.

Adım Adım Çözüm

Identify the argument's premises and conclusion.

Premise: Reflective coatings on commercial warehouses reduced interior temperatures and led to a 15% reduction in cooling energy consumption. Conclusion: Extending the coating mandate to residential homes will achieve a similar 15% reduction in residential cooling energy consumption.

Understanding the precise link between evidence (warehouse trial) and claim (residential outcome) highlights implicit assumptions.

Identify the logical vulnerability in applying warehouse trial results to single-family homes.

The argument assumes that residential roofs receive comparable direct solar exposure and respond similarly to reflective coatings as commercial warehouse roofs.

Weakening questions require finding evidence that breaks the transferability of trial results from one setting to another.

Evaluate the option choices to find a relevant factor that disrupts the mechanism of action.

The statement noting that residential roofs are heavily shaded by tree canopies demonstrates that solar radiation rarely hits these roofs directly, making reflective coatings ineffective.

If reflective coatings do not receive direct sunlight, they cannot lower interior temperatures or reduce cooling energy usage as expected.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening Arguments by Disproving Analogy and Transferability

Soru 23Soru →

To combat outbreaks of multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in intensive care units, a regional health network replaced all alcohol-based hand rubs with an advanced chlorhexidine-glucoheptonate formulation. Over the subsequent twelve-month period, hospital-acquired A. baumannii infection rates in these units dropped by 45 percent. Concluding that the new formulation was directly responsible for this reduction, the network's epidemiological board mandated its exclusive use across all patient departments to suppress hospital-acquired bacterial infections. Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the epidemiological board's conclusion?

At the start of the twelve-month period, the health network simultaneously implemented an automated ultraviolet-C room sterilization protocol in its intensive care units that independently eradicates surface-bound A. baumannii.

Laboratory assays demonstrate that the chlorhexidine-glucoheptonate formulation neutralizes bacterial cell membranes significantly faster than standard alcohol-based sanitizers do.

Hospital-acquired fungal infections in non-intensive care wards increased slightly during the same twelve-month observation period.

The financial cost of procuring the chlorhexidine-glucoheptonate formulation exceeds the annual budget allocated for standard hygiene supplies.

Patients admitted to intensive care units typically present with more severe underlying immunosuppression than patients admitted to general medical wards.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: At the start of the twelve-month period, the health network simultaneously implemented an automated ultraviolet-C room sterilization protocol in its intensive care units that independently eradicates surface-bound A. baumannii.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by the statement that the health network simultaneously implemented an automated ultraviolet-C room sterilization protocol in its intensive care units that independently eradicates surface-bound A. baumannii.

The correct answer weakens the causal claim by introducing a confounding variable. If the hospital introduced automated ultraviolet-C room sterilization in the intensive care units at the exact same time as the new hand sanitizers, the 45 percent drop in A. baumannii infections could have been caused entirely or primarily by the UVC sterilization rather than the chlorhexidine formulation.

Adım Adım Çözüm

Analyze the argument structure

Premise: Infection rates dropped 45% after introducing chlorhexidine rubs in ICUs. Conclusion: The chlorhexidine rubs caused the drop and will suppress infections network-wide.

Identifying the author's causal claim (sanitizer -> infection drop) isolates the core logical vulnerability.

Evaluate the causal inference for vulnerabilities

The argument assumes no other concurrent change caused the drop in ICU infection rates.

Causal conclusions based on observational before-and-after data are vulnerable to alternative co-occurring causes (confounding variables).

Select the option that supplies an alternative explanation

The concurrent implementation of ultraviolet-C room sterilization in ICUs provides an independent cause for the reduction in A. baumannii.

If another effective intervention was introduced at the exact same time in the exact same location, the reduction cannot be confidently attributed to the hand sanitizer formulation.

Anahtar Kavram

Causal Flaw: Alternative Explanation / Confounding Variable

Soru 24Soru →

Archaeologists studying Neolithic settlements in the Scandinavian archipelago recently argued that the introduction of copper tool working around 2500 BCE caused a dramatic surge in localized timber harvesting for smelting fuel. This conclusion rests on sediment cores retrieved from lakes adjacent to early copper smelting hearths, which exhibit a sudden, marked reduction in tree pollen dating to the exact era when copper artifacts first appear in the region. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the archaeologists' argument?

Analysis of fossilized plant macrofossils from the region indicates that a virulent fungal blight devastated major tree species around 2500 BCE, drastically reducing tree pollen levels independent of human logging.

Experimental reconstructions of Neolithic metallurgical processes indicate that smelting early Scandinavian copper ore required significantly more timber fuel per kilogram of finished metal than previously estimated.

Copper tools preserved from 2500 BCE show significantly higher durability and wear resistance than traditional flint implements previously used for agricultural clearing.

The early inhabitants of the archipelago eventually abandoned copper smelting in favor of iron forging centuries later due to dwindling local timber reserves.

Sediment cores taken from lakes located far from any metallurgical sites showed no measurable change in tree pollen during the third millennium BCE.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Analysis of fossilized plant macrofossils from the region indicates that a virulent fungal blight devastated major tree species around 2500 BCE, drastically reducing tree pollen levels independent of human logging.

Cevap

The argument is most weakened by the finding that a virulent fungal blight devastated major tree species around 2500 BCE, drastically reducing tree pollen levels independent of human logging.

The argument infers that human timber harvesting caused the tree pollen drop observed in sediment cores. Demonstrating that a fungal blight devastated tree species in the region at the exact same time provides an independent alternative explanation for the pollen decrease, thereby severely weakening the causal connection to copper smelting fuel.

Adım Adım Çözüm

Deconstruct the argument structure into premises and conclusion

Premise: Sediment cores near smelting hearths show a sudden drop in tree pollen around 2500 BCE. Conclusion: Copper working caused a surge in timber harvesting for fuel.

Identifying the unstated assumption (that the pollen drop was specifically caused by human timber harvesting for fuel) reveals the argument's key vulnerability.

Evaluate potential weakening strategies

To undermine a causal inference, show an alternative cause for the observed effect (the tree pollen reduction) that operates independently of the presumed cause (timber harvesting).

If an environmental factor caused the pollen drop, the correlation between smelting artifacts and pollen loss does not prove a causal relation.

Assess the correct alternative cause statement

A widespread fungal blight attacking major tree species around 2500 BCE accounts for the reduced tree pollen without requiring timber harvesting.

This directly severing the link between copper smelting fuel needs and the observed pollen data.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening Causal Arguments via Alternative Causes

Soru 25Soru →

To reduce particulate matter emissions in its central historic district, municipal administrators implemented a initiative replacing heavy diesel delivery vans with electric cargo tricycles for last-mile freight transportation. Six months into the initiative, municipal logs indicated that while total freight delivery volume in the district remained unchanged, total diesel van mileage within the district dropped by 45 percent. City officials concluded from these data that the initiative successfully reduced total freight-related particulate matter emissions generated within the historic district. Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the city officials' conclusion?

The transfer hubs where diesel vans unload freight onto electric tricycles are located inside the historic district, and vans idle their engines continuously during transfers, emitting more particulate matter per delivery than when driving.

Electric cargo tricycles produce zero direct tailpipe emissions and generate significantly less brake dust per kilometer than traditional diesel delivery vans.

Air quality monitoring stations in residential suburbs surrounding the city recorded a minor decrease in fine particulate concentrations over the same six-month period.

Merchants in the historic district reported experiencing minor delivery schedule adjustments during the initial weeks of transition to the tricycle delivery system.

Commercial delivery fleets in neighboring municipalities began replacing older diesel vans with hybrid models during the same year.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The transfer hubs where diesel vans unload freight onto electric tricycles are located inside the historic district, and vans idle their engines continuously during transfers, emitting more particulate matter per delivery than when driving.

Cevap

The conclusion is most seriously weakened by evidence that diesel vans idle continuously at transfer hubs within the district during cargo transfers, generating more particulate matter per delivery than they saved by driving fewer miles.

The author concludes that total freight emissions in the historic district decreased based solely on a reduction in van driving mileage. The correct answer points out that diesel vans now spend significant time idling their engines at internal transfer hubs while transferring cargo onto tricycles, producing more emissions per delivery during idling than they saved by driving fewer miles. This unconsidered emission source invalidates the assumption that fewer miles driven equals lower overall emissions.

Adım Adım Çözüm

Identify the premise and conclusion of the argument.

Premise: Diesel van mileage in the historic district dropped by 45% while freight volume stayed constant. Conclusion: Freight-related particulate matter emissions generated within the district decreased.

Understanding the precise gap between the premise (mileage measurement) and conclusion (total emission output) is necessary to evaluate potential vulnerabilities.

Identify the implicit assumption linking mileage to total emissions.

The argument assumes that driving mileage is the sole significant source of freight-related emissions in the district and that non-driving emission sources did not increase.

If emissions from other parts of the delivery process (such as cargo transfer idling) increased substantially, reduced mileage would not guarantee reduced overall emissions.

Evaluate the answer choices to find the statement that demonstrates overall emissions did not decrease despite reduced mileage.

The statement describing continuous van engine idling at transfer hubs inside the district shows that a new, high-emission activity was introduced, offsetting the savings from reduced mileage.

This directly undermines the logical bridge connecting reduced driving distance to reduced total district emissions.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening Causal and Presumptive Claims by Introducing Unaccounted Offsetting Factors

Soru 26Soru →

To reduce operational overhead and improve employee retention, a financial services firm mandated a hybrid work schedule allowing employees to work remotely three days a week. Following the policy's implementation, total energy consumption at the firm's headquarters decreased by 30 percent, and employee turnover dropped by 15 percent. Management concluded that the hybrid policy was directly responsible for the reduction in facility operating costs and the increase in worker retention. Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously undermines the management's conclusion?

Simultaneously with the schedule change, the firm implemented a substantial firm-wide compensation increase and installed an automated energy-management system at headquarters.

Internal surveys conducted six months after the transition indicated that employees experienced less daily stress and appreciated the reduced weekly commuting time.

Several client-facing departments required additional software licenses to facilitate remote communication among team members.

Employees at competing financial institutions who were granted fully remote positions reported higher overall satisfaction than hybrid workers in similar roles.

Management assumed that employees would maintain identical work output regardless of whether they worked from home or from the central office.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Simultaneously with the schedule change, the firm implemented a substantial firm-wide compensation increase and installed an automated energy-management system at headquarters.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by the statement establishing that a firm-wide compensation increase and an automated energy-management system were introduced at the same time as the hybrid policy.

The correct response undermines the conclusion by introducing confounding variables. If a firm-wide salary increase and an automated energy-management system were implemented concurrently with the policy change, those interventions offer a compelling alternative explanation for the drop in turnover and energy usage, thereby severely weakening the claim that the hybrid work policy was the direct cause.

Adım Adım Çözüm

Identify the conclusion and premises of the argument.

Premise: After adopting a hybrid work policy, energy usage dropped by 30% and turnover dropped by 15%. Conclusion: The hybrid work policy directly caused the reductions in operating costs and turnover.

Isolating the causal claim is necessary to determine how to weaken it.

Evaluate potential logical vulnerabilities in the causal inference.

The argument assumes correlation equals causation and ignores potential confounding external factors that could independently account for lower energy consumption and lower turnover.

Causal claims can be effectively undermined by introducing alternative explanations for the observed effects.

Select the choice that provides a viable alternative cause for the results.

The statement introducing a simultaneous salary raise (explaining lower turnover) and an automated building control system (explaining lower energy consumption) directly weakens the claim that the hybrid schedule was responsible.

Showing that independent simultaneous events account for both reported outcomes severely undermines the proposed causal relationship.

Anahtar Kavram

Alternative Causal Explanations in Critical Reasoning

Soru 27Soru →

To reduce light-induced degradation of delicate seventeenth-century oil paintings, curators at the Vane Gallery replaced all traditional halogen spotlights with light-emitting diode (LED) fixtures that emit zero ultraviolet radiation. Because ultraviolet rays were previously identified as a chief contributor to varnish oxidation, the curators concluded that overall pigment and varnish breakdown in the gallery's collection will decrease by at least 40 percent over the coming decade. Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the curators' argument?

The financial savings resulting from lower energy consumption after switching to LED lighting will enable the gallery to expand its collection of seventeenth-century artwork.

The specific spectrum of high-energy visible blue light emitted by the new LED fixtures triggers chemical oxidation in seventeenth-century pigments at rates comparable to ultraviolet radiation.

Controlled laboratory trials indicated that traditional halogen spotlights cause significantly more rapid varnish yellowing than any other conventional incandescent light source.

Environmental humidity fluctuations in art galleries generally present a greater long-term risk to wooden structural supports than light exposure does.

Visitors to the gallery report that paintings illuminated by LED fixtures display greater visual clarity than those previously lit by halogen lamps.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The specific spectrum of high-energy visible blue light emitted by the new LED fixtures triggers chemical oxidation in seventeenth-century pigments at rates comparable to ultraviolet radiation.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by the statement that high-energy visible blue light emitted by the new LED fixtures triggers chemical oxidation in seventeenth-century pigments at rates comparable to ultraviolet radiation.

The argument concludes that switching from halogen to LED lighting will decrease overall painting degradation by at least 40 percent because LEDs emit no UV radiation. The correct answer points out that the new LED lights emit high-energy visible blue light that causes chemical oxidation at rates comparable to UV light. By showing that the new lighting system introduces a different wavelength of light that causes equivalent damage, it demonstrates that the expected reduction in overall degradation is unlikely to occur.

Adım Adım Çözüm

Identify the argument's premises and conclusion.

The premises state that halogen lights (which emit UV rays that oxidize varnish) were replaced with LED lights emitting zero UV radiation. The conclusion is that overall pigment and varnish breakdown will drop by at least 40%.

Understanding the logical jump from removing UV radiation to expecting an overall 40% reduction in total breakdown is essential.

Identify the unstated assumption or flaw in reasoning.

The curators assume that removing UV radiation will substantially reduce overall breakdown without introducing a new harmful factor or overlooking another major source of light damage from LEDs.

To weaken a causal plan-goal argument, look for evidence that the intervention introduces a new cause of the same problem or fails to address another primary cause.

Evaluate the choices to find the statement that undermines the conclusion.

The finding that the new LED lights emit high-energy blue light causing oxidation at rates comparable to UV radiation shows that replacing halogen with LED will not yield the projected 40% drop in damage.

This directly counters the projected decrease by introducing an alternative damaging mechanism inherent to the new LED fixtures.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening Causal and Plan-Goal Arguments by Identifying Side Effects or Alternative Causes

Tahmini Süre:1m 30s

ÖncekiSayfa 2 / 2

Weakening Arguments

Cevap

Adım Adım Çözüm

Anahtar Kavram

Sık Yapılan Hatalar

Cevap

Adım Adım Çözüm

Anahtar Kavram

Sık Yapılan Hatalar

Cevap

Adım Adım Çözüm

Anahtar Kavram

Sık Yapılan Hatalar

Cevap

Adım Adım Çözüm

Anahtar Kavram

Sık Yapılan Hatalar

Cevap

Adım Adım Çözüm

Anahtar Kavram

Sık Yapılan Hatalar

Cevap

Adım Adım Çözüm

Anahtar Kavram

Sık Yapılan Hatalar

Cevap

Adım Adım Çözüm

Anahtar Kavram

Sık Yapılan Hatalar