Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: ZorIdentifying Main Conclusions

Municipal governments ought to redirect current architectural preservation subsidies toward the construction of entirely new, purpose-built civic centers. The primary value of civic architecture lies in its functional utility to current residents, not in its historical footprint. Mid-century Brutalist buildings, which currently receive the bulk of these subsidies, are notoriously energy-inefficient and structurally resistant to modern accessibility retrofits. Retaining these outdated structures inherently compromises a municipality's ability to provide sustainable and accessible public spaces.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion drawn in the argument?

  1. A
    Maintaining outdated Brutalist structures undermines a city's ability to offer sustainable and accessible public spaces.
  2. B
    The true value of civic architecture depends on its functional utility rather than its historical footprint.
  3. C
    Mid-century Brutalist buildings are the most energy-inefficient civic structures currently maintained by municipal governments.
  4. Municipalities should reallocate their architectural preservation funds toward constructing new civic buildings.Cevap
  5. E
    Purpose-built civic centers will eventually acquire the same level of historical significance as mid-century Brutalist buildings.

Cevap

Municipalities should reallocate their architectural preservation funds toward constructing new civic buildings.
The correct answer accurately paraphrases the first sentence of the stimulus. In this argument, the author's primary goal is to advocate for a specific policy change: redirecting preservation subsidies toward building new civic centers. The rest of the passage is dedicated to proving why this change is necessary (because current buildings lack utility, are inefficient, and compromise public space). Since no other statement is supported by this first sentence, it is the main conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the stimulus to separate facts and premises from normative claims and conclusions.
Identified that the passage contains a recommendation (redirect subsidies) and several supporting claims (utility over history, inefficiency of Brutalist buildings, compromised ability to provide public spaces).
Main conclusions in LSAT arguments are often recommendations or strong opinions supported by the surrounding evidence.
2
Determine the logical flow between the identified components.
The premises about utility and inefficiency support the claim that retaining Brutalist structures compromises public spaces. This claim, in turn, supports the opening recommendation to redirect funds to new buildings.
A main conclusion must be the ultimate point of the argument, supported by other statements but not supporting any other statement.
3
Select the option that best paraphrases the ultimate point of the argument.
The correct paraphrase matches the first sentence: Municipal governments ought to redirect preservation subsidies toward new civic centers.
This is the only statement in the stimulus that serves purely as the endpoint of the reasoning chain.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Main Conclusions
Tahmini Süre:1m 45s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Identifying Main Conclusions

Bu konudan daha fazla soru