Soru

Zorluk: ZorIdentifying Main Conclusions

Wild cereal grains naturally shatter upon ripening, a trait that makes them exceptionally difficult to harvest efficiently. Because of this, early human foragers instinctively concentrated their gathering efforts on the rare mutant plants that retained their seeds on the stalk. The prevailing theory that the initial domestication of these cereal crops was a deliberate agricultural innovation is fundamentally flawed; it was actually a purely accidental byproduct of basic foraging practices. After all, the successfully gathered seeds were the ones inadvertently scattered around settlements, meaning this selective harvesting inevitably increased the proportion of non-shattering mutants in the local populations over successive generations.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument?

  1. The early domestication of cereal crops occurred unintentionally through standard gathering behaviors, rather than through intentional agricultural planning.Cevap
  2. B
    Early foragers preferentially gathered from rare mutant plants that held onto their seeds because normal wild grains were too difficult to harvest.
  3. C
    The practice of selectively harvesting non-shattering mutants caused an unintentional but inevitable increase in their prevalence over time.
  4. D
    Wild cereal grains possess a natural shattering trait that significantly hinders the efficiency of traditional harvesting methods.
  5. E
    The deliberate cultivation of agricultural crops would not have been possible without the pre-existing presence of non-shattering mutant seeds.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that early domestication of cereal crops occurred unintentionally through standard gathering behaviors, rather than through intentional agricultural planning.
The correct answer accurately restates the author's primary thesis: that domestication was not a planned agricultural innovation (as the 'prevailing theory' suggests), but rather an 'accidental byproduct of basic foraging practices.' All other statements in the stimulus serve to explain how and why this accidental process occurred.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structure of the argument to separate premises from conclusions.
Identified the first sentence as a foundational premise. Identified the second sentence as an intermediate conclusion supported by the first. Identified the final sentence as a premise supporting the third sentence.
Deconstructing the stimulus is required to map the logical flow and isolate the author's ultimate claim.
2
Locate the main conclusion by evaluating which statement is supported by the rest of the text but supports nothing else.
The third sentence ('The prevailing theory... is fundamentally flawed; it was actually a purely accidental byproduct of basic foraging practices.') is the main conclusion.
This statement represents the author's primary judgment and is supported by both the intermediate conclusion (foragers gathered mutant seeds) and the final premise (this gathering inevitably increased the mutant population).
3
Evaluate the answer choices to find the closest logical paraphrase of the identified main conclusion.
The option stating domestication occurred unintentionally rather than through intentional planning directly paraphrases the third sentence.
The correct answer in a Main Conclusion question must capture the exact meaning and scope of the argument's ultimate point.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Main Conclusions in arguments with complex structures, including intermediate conclusions and unmarked ultimate claims.
Bu soruyu puanla