Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaMethod of Reasoning

Legal theorist: Some jurisprudence scholars advocate the "expectation-only" principle, which asserts that contractual damages should be awarded solely to put the non-breaching party in the financial position they would have occupied had the contract been fulfilled, without regard to foreseeable reliance costs incurred before execution. However, adopting this principle would systematically incentivize parties to conceal early preparatory expenses from one another to avoid uncompensable losses, thereby undermining the transparency necessary for reliable contracting in the first place. Therefore, the expectation-only principle is self-undermining as a general foundation for contract law.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the method of reasoning employed in the legal theorist's argument?

  1. A
    challenging a legal principle by directly disputing the factual premise that pre-execution reliance costs are common in commercial transactions
  2. B
    rejecting a proposed standard by arguing that its proponents have confused a necessary condition for contract formation with a sufficient condition
  3. arguing that implementing a proposed rule would generate incentives that undermine a condition essential to the practice the rule is intended to regulateCevap
  4. D
    criticizing a policy by drawing an analogy between commercial contract negotiations and non-binding diplomatic agreements
  5. E
    concluding that a standard is entirely invalid solely because it fails to provide adequate remedies in an extreme, atypical scenario

Cevap

The argument proceeds by arguing that implementing a proposed rule would generate incentives that undermine a condition essential to the practice the rule is intended to regulate.
The theorist refutes the expectation-only principle by showing that it generates perverse incentives—specifically, motivating parties to conceal preparatory costs—which destroys mutual transparency, a foundational prerequisite for reliable contracting. Thus, the principle defeats the very purpose of contract law.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
The final sentence expresses the main conclusion: the expectation-only principle is self-undermining as a general foundation for contract law.
Determining the conclusion establishes the claim that the author's premises are intended to support.
2
Analyze how the premises support the conclusion.
The theorist introduces a proposed legal standard, traces the practical incentives it creates (parties concealing preparatory expenses), and shows that this consequence erodes transparency, which is a necessary prerequisite for reliable contracting.
Method of reasoning questions require identifying the structural relationship between premises and conclusion.
3
Abstract the logical strategy into general terms.
The author demonstrates that adopting a proposed principle produces consequences that destroy a fundamental condition required for the effective functioning of the system governed by that principle.
Matching the concrete argument to an accurate abstract description reveals the correct choice.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Argumentative Technique (Self-Defeating Principle)
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Method of Reasoning

Bu konudan daha fazla soru