According to the newly revised deep-sea exploration safety protocols, a submersible is certified for trench operations only if its hull is constructed using a titanium-carbon matrix. Unless a vessel has an upgraded pressure-compensation system, it cannot be constructed using a titanium-carbon matrix. An upgraded pressure-compensation system is never approved for installation without the vessel passing an acoustic integrity scan. Furthermore, passing the acoustic integrity scan requires the installation of redundant hydrostatic sensors.
Based on the safety protocols described above, which of the following must be true?
- Any submersible that does not have redundant hydrostatic sensors installed is not certified for trench operations.Cevap
- BIf a submersible passes the acoustic integrity scan, its hull is constructed using a titanium-carbon matrix.
- CAny submersible that lacks a titanium-carbon matrix hull does not have redundant hydrostatic sensors installed.
- DInstalling redundant hydrostatic sensors is sufficient to guarantee that a submersible will pass the acoustic integrity scan.
- ETitanium-carbon matrix hulls provide the greatest protection against structural failure during extreme depth operations.
Cevap
Any submersible that does not have redundant hydrostatic sensors installed is not certified for trench operations.
The correct answer accurately reflects the contrapositive of the entire conditional chain. The stimulus establishes that certification requires a titanium hull (C -> T), which requires an upgraded system (T -> U), which requires an acoustic scan (U -> S), which in turn requires redundant sensors (S -> R). By linking these, we get: Certification -> Redundant sensors (C -> R). The contrapositive of this relationship is: No redundant sensors -> No certification (~R -> ~C).
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Diagramming Conditional Statements and Forming Deductive Chains