Soru

Zorluk: ZorDiagramming Conditional Statements

A city planner is outlining the causal dependencies of a proposed urban renewal project. Order the following propositions to establish a continuous, unbroken logical chain proving that passing the new zoning ordinance guarantees the expansion of the rail network.

  1. 1A failure to approve high-density residential construction indicates with certainty that the city council did not pass the new zoning ordinance.
  2. 2Approving high-density residential construction will always result in an increase in the population density in the downtown sector.
  3. 3If a major retail conglomerate decides against opening a flagship store, one can conclude that the population density in the downtown sector did not increase.
  4. 4The opening of a flagship store by a major retail conglomerate will inevitably lead to the regional transit authority expanding the rail network.

Cevap

The correct logical progression starts with the contrapositive of the zoning approval failure (Ordinance → Construction), follows directly to the density increase (Construction → Density), uses the contrapositive of the retail store failure (Density → Retail), and concludes directly with the transit expansion (Retail → Transit).
The correct sequence successfully maps the conditional relationships, translating contrapositives where necessary, to form a continuous transitive chain. It moves from Ordinance → Construction (via contrapositive), then Construction → Density (direct translation), then Density → Retail (via contrapositive), and finally Retail → Transit Expansion (direct translation).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the required starting trigger and the final necessary outcome from the stem.
The chain must start with 'passing the new zoning ordinance' and end with 'the expansion of the rail network'.
Establishing the endpoints determines the proper direction of the transitive deductive chain.
2
Diagram the statement containing the starting trigger, applying the contrapositive rule if necessary.
The statement about a failure to approve construction indicates (No Construction → No Ordinance). The contrapositive is (Ordinance → Construction).
This correctly provides the first positive link from the starting trigger.
3
Find the statement where the necessary condition of the first link becomes the sufficient condition.
The statement about approving construction directly translates to (Construction → Density Increase).
This extends the chain to its second step via the transitive property.
4
Diagram the remaining statements to complete the path to the final outcome.
The statement regarding the retail conglomerate deciding against opening translates to (No Retail → No Density), which becomes (Density → Retail) via contrapositive. Finally, the statement about the opening of a flagship store translates directly to (Retail → Transit Expansion).
This completes the unbroken logical chain: Ordinance → Construction → Density Increase → Retail Store → Transit Expansion.

Anahtar Kavram

Diagramming Conditional Statements and Contrapositives
Bu soruyu puanla