Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: ZorCorrelation vs. Causation

A comprehensive economic survey of mid-sized software companies revealed a strong statistical link between the adoption of open-plan office layouts and a significant increase in total annual revenue during the year of adoption. Based on this data, the authors of the survey conclude that removing physical barriers between employees directly enhances collaboration, which in turn drives the observed revenue growth.

Which of the following statements, if true, provide a valid alternative causal explanation for the observed correlation? (Select all that apply.)

  1. Companies experiencing sudden surges in revenue often undergo rapid hiring phases, forcing them to convert existing spaces into open-plan layouts to maximize desk density for new employees.Cevap
  2. The infusion of substantial venture capital funding typically enables start-ups to both aggressively expand their sales operations and simultaneously remodel their workspaces into open-plan layouts.Cevap
  3. C
    Employees working in open-plan offices frequently report experiencing higher levels of ambient noise and a decreased ability to focus on complex programming tasks.
  4. D
    Some software companies that retained traditional enclosed offices experienced an even greater increase in total annual revenue during the period covered by the survey.
  5. E
    The proportion of software companies adopting open-plan layouts has increased steadily, but the absolute number of employees working in these environments has remained relatively stable.

Cevap

The correct answers are the statements proposing that rapid hiring from revenue surges forces layout changes, and that venture capital funding causes both layout changes and sales expansion.
The argument observes a correlation between two phenomena (open-plan layouts and revenue increase) and erroneously concludes that the first directly caused the second. To provide a valid alternative explanation, an answer must show how the correlation could exist without the author's proposed causal direction. The correct selections do exactly this: one demonstrates reverse causation (revenue increase causes the need for open layouts to fit new hires), and the other demonstrates a third-variable cause (venture capital causes both the new office layout and the aggressive sales growth).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the argument's structure and conclusion.
Premise: Correlation between open-plan layouts and increased revenue. Conclusion: Open-plan layouts cause the revenue increase.
Identifying the premise and conclusion is necessary to pinpoint the exact logical leap the author makes.
2
Identify the logical flaw in the reasoning.
The author commits a causal flaw by assuming that a correlation proves causation, ignoring other possibilities.
Understanding the flaw dictates what the correct answers must accomplish.
3
Determine the criteria for the correct answers based on the question stem.
The correct answers must provide valid alternative causal explanations for the observed correlation.
A valid alternative explanation in correlation/causation scenarios typically involves either reverse causation (B causes A) or a third common cause (C causes both A and B).
4
Evaluate each option against the criteria.
The option regarding rapid hiring demonstrates reverse causation. The option regarding venture capital demonstrates a third common cause. The other options fail to explain the correlation.
This systematic evaluation ensures only statements that logically resolve the correlation through an alternate causal pathway are selected.

Anahtar Kavram

Correlation vs. Causation
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Correlation vs. Causation

Bu konudan daha fazla soru