Soru

Zorluk: OrtaIdentifying Main Conclusions

Read the following argument carefully. Match each excerpt from the argument to its correct structural role.

Argument:
Some scholars contend that the ancient Minoan civilization collapsed primarily due to a massive volcanic eruption on the island of Thera. However, archaeological evidence indicates that the Thera eruption occurred at least a century before the widespread destruction of Minoan palaces. Consequently, the volcanic eruption could not have been the direct cause of the Minoan collapse. Instead, historical records of the era increasingly describe widespread naval conflicts and invasions from mainland powers. Thus, the Minoan civilization most likely fell due to foreign conquest.

  • "Some scholars contend that the ancient Minoan civilization collapsed primarily due to a massive volcanic eruption..."A claim that the argument as a whole is designed to refute
  • "archaeological evidence indicates that the Thera eruption occurred at least a century before the widespread destruction..."A premise used to undermine an opposing view
  • "Consequently, the volcanic eruption could not have been the direct cause of the Minoan collapse."A subsidiary conclusion
  • "Thus, the Minoan civilization most likely fell due to foreign conquest."The main conclusion of the argument

Cevap

Excerpt 1 matches 'A claim that the argument as a whole is designed to refute'. Excerpt 2 matches 'A premise used to undermine an opposing view'. Excerpt 3 matches 'A subsidiary conclusion'. Excerpt 4 matches 'The main conclusion of the argument'.
In this argument, the author introduces an opposing viewpoint (Minoans fell due to a volcano) in order to refute it. The author uses a factual premise (the eruption timeline) to reach a subsidiary conclusion (the volcano wasn't the cause). Finally, using another premise about historical records, the author reaches the ultimate, main conclusion (foreign conquest was the cause).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the author's primary goal in the passage.
The author wants to prove that foreign conquest, not a volcanic eruption, ended the Minoan civilization.
This establishes the main conclusion ('Thus, the Minoan civilization most likely fell...').
2
Analyze the opening statement.
The opening statement presents a view ('Some scholars contend...') that the author argues against.
This identifies it as the opposing claim to be refuted.
3
Trace the logic used to defeat the opposing claim.
The author provides a fact (the eruption happened a century earlier) to deduce that the volcano wasn't the direct cause.
This separates the premise (the factual evidence) from the subsidiary conclusion (the deduction that the volcano wasn't the cause).

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying the structural roles of statements in a complex argument, including intermediate conclusions and main conclusions.
Bu soruyu puanla