Tüm alıştırma soruları

3960 soru

Soru 2341Soru →

Every deep-sea expedition in the Clarion Trench that detects hydrothermal chimney deposits performs isotope mass spectrometry on its sediment cores. Any expedition that performs isotope mass spectrometry on its sediment cores publishes its stratigraphy dataset in the Open Ocean Registry, unless it is funded by a private mineral consortium. Furthermore, no expedition that publishes its stratigraphy dataset in the Open Ocean Registry fails to submit its benthic fauna logs to the International Seabed Authority. Last year, the research vessel Astraea conducted an expedition in the Clarion Trench, detected hydrothermal chimney deposits, and did not submit its benthic fauna logs to the International Seabed Authority.

Based on the statements above, which of the following statements must be true? (Select all that apply.)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The research vessel Astraea performed isotope mass spectrometry on its sediment cores.; The research vessel Astraea was funded by a private mineral consortium.

Cevap

The statements establishing that Astraea performed isotope mass spectrometry on its sediment cores and that Astraea was funded by a private mineral consortium must both be true.
The deduction that Astraea performed isotope mass spectrometry follows directly from the first premise. The deduction that Astraea was funded by a private mineral consortium is derived by combining the contrapositive of the logging rule with the conditional exception in the second premise.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Apply the first premise to the factual case of Astraea.
Since Astraea operated in the Clarion Trench and detected hydrothermal chimney deposits, it is logically guaranteed that Astraea performed isotope mass spectrometry on its sediment cores.
The rule states that detecting chimney deposits in the Clarion Trench is sufficient to guarantee isotope mass spectrometry.
2
Take the contrapositive of the third premise regarding benthic fauna logs.
Since Astraea did not submit benthic fauna logs to the International Seabed Authority, Astraea did not publish its stratigraphy dataset in the Open Ocean Registry.
The third premise states that publishing in the registry guarantees log submission; failing to submit logs proves non-publication.
3
Synthesize the results with the second conditional premise ('unless' condition).
Because Astraea performed isotope mass spectrometry but did not publish in the registry, Astraea must be funded by a private mineral consortium.
Expeditions performing spectrometry must publish unless funded by a private mineral consortium; hence, non-publishing spectrometry expeditions must be privately funded.

Anahtar Kavram

Multi-step conditional chaining with contrapositive deduction and exception ('unless') resolution
Soru 2342Soru →

Every container vessel docking at Port Vane must either utilize shore power while berthed or burn certified ultra-low emission fuel. Any vessel that burns certified ultra-low emission fuel is subject to mandatory fuel auditing by the maritime authority unless it possesses an active green-flag certification. Yesterday, the container vessel Meridian Star docked at Port Vane, did not utilize shore power while berthed, and does not possess an active green-flag certification.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The Meridian Star is subject to mandatory fuel auditing by the maritime authority.

Cevap

The Meridian Star is subject to mandatory fuel auditing by the maritime authority.
The conclusion that the Meridian Star is subject to mandatory fuel auditing strictly follows from combining the premises. Under Port Vane rules, every docking vessel must use shore power or burn ultra-low emission fuel. Since the Meridian Star docked and did not use shore power, it had to burn ultra-low emission fuel. Under the second rule, burning that fuel triggers mandatory fuel auditing unless the ship has green-flag certification. Because the Meridian Star lacks this certification, the audit is strictly required.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the first requirement for vessels docking at Port Vane.
Docking Vessel → Shore Power OR Ultra-Low Emission Fuel.
Establishes a disjunctive requirement for all docking container vessels.
2
Apply the facts regarding the Meridian Star to the first rule.
Because the Meridian Star docked at Port Vane and did not use shore power, it must have burned certified ultra-low emission fuel.
Eliminating one disjunct necessitates the truth of the remaining disjunct.
3
Evaluate the auditing condition given the vessel's status.
Ultra-Low Emission Fuel AND No Green-Flag Certification → Mandatory Fuel Audit.
Since the Meridian Star satisfies both conditions (burned the fuel and lacks the certification), the mandatory audit necessarily follows.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Chaining and Disjunctive Elimination
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 2343Soru →

Nutritionist: A recent study observed that households that regularly consume fermented tea report 40 percent fewer seasonal respiratory infections than households that do not consume fermented tea. The beverage contains high concentrations of antioxidants, which support immune function. Therefore, regular consumption of fermented tea directly reduces the likelihood of developing seasonal respiratory infections.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the nutritionist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Households that regularly consume fermented tea are significantly more likely to engage in regular exercise and follow hygienic practices than households that do not.

Cevap

Households that regularly consume fermented tea are significantly more likely to engage in regular exercise and follow hygienic practices than households that do not.
The correct response points out that households drinking fermented tea also practice other health-promoting behaviors, such as regular exercise and good hygiene. This provides an alternative explanation for their lower infection rate, demonstrating that the observed benefit may be due to general lifestyle factors rather than the fermented tea itself.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premises and conclusion of the stimulus.
Premise: Fermented tea drinkers report 40% fewer respiratory infections and the tea has antioxidants. Conclusion: Drinking fermented tea directly causes a reduced likelihood of infection.
Isolating the core argument reveals the gap between an observed correlation and a direct causal claim.
2
Identify the underlying logical assumption.
The author assumes there is no confounding variable or alternative explanation accounting for the difference in infection rates between the two groups.
Causal arguments on the LSAT frequently assume that correlation implies causation and that other causative factors are absent.
3
Evaluate the answer choices for a statement that undermines this assumption.
The choice showing that fermented tea consumers also engage in more exercise and better hygiene provides a plausible alternative cause for their fewer infections.
Demonstrating a third variable that accounts for the observed effect severs the direct causal link asserted in the conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Alternative Explanations in Causal Reasoning
Soru 2344Soru →

Traditional historical narratives consistently characterize the nineteenth-century transition from inquisitorial to adversarial legal frameworks in continental Europe as a progressive dismantling of the state’s monopoly over truth-seeking. In the inquisitorial model, a state-appointed magistrate actively directed investigations, aggressively interrogated witnesses, and unilaterally determined outcomes—a concentration of power that Enlightenment-era reformists decried as inherently tyrannical. The subsequent adoption of the adversarial model—in which opposing parties present their competing cases before a theoretically impartial judge or jury—is thus overwhelmingly celebrated in contemporary legal scholarship as an unalloyed triumph of individual rights and a crucial structural limitation on state overreach.

However, a closer examination of the immediate sociological aftermath of this procedural revolution reveals a far more paradoxical effect. The adversarial model, predicated on increasingly complex rules of evidence and formalized rhetorical combat, necessitated the immediate creation of a specialized class of legal representatives. By requiring that citizens navigate the justice system through the proxy of formally trained advocates, the new framework effectively replaced the singular state adjudicator with a private, yet highly regulated and elite, professional guild. This rapid professionalization erected a formidable barrier to entry for the average citizen, ensuring that only those with the financial means and social capital to secure competent representation could meaningfully participate in the newly "democratized" legal arena.

Furthermore, the procedural rigidities inherent in adversarial contests fundamentally altered the public's epistemological relationship with the law. Under the inquisitorial system, despite its well-documented abuses and structural imbalances, the accused were frequently permitted to provide direct, uninterrupted narrative testimony regarding their circumstances and motivations. The adversarial framework, by contrast, demanded that complex human grievances be strictly translated into a rigid taxonomy of recognized legal fictions. The lived, holistic experience of the accused was fractured into discrete, legally actionable elements, filtered entirely through the specialized vocabulary of the advocate. This process not only alienated individuals from their own narratives but also stripped the judicial proceedings of their localized, communal resonance, replacing it with a sterile, formalized discourse.

Ultimately, a rigorous analysis of these structural shifts suggests that the centralized state’s role within the legal apparatus did not so much diminish as it evolved. The state transitioned from acting as the direct, visible inquisitor to serving as the distant architect and ultimate arbiter of a highly ritualized procedural arena. By delegating the messy, immediate realities of conflict resolution to a specialized class of professionals operating within strict state-sanctioned parameters, the state successfully insulated its foundational authority from direct public challenge. It created a significantly more resilient, opaque, and culturally embedded mechanism of social control, paradoxically operating under the ideological banner of individual emancipation.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main idea of the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: While traditional histories view the nineteenth-century shift to adversarial legal systems as a victory for individual rights, this transition actually strengthened state authority by alienating the public and interposing a specialized legal profession.

Cevap

The correct answer accurately synthesizes the passage's dispersed premises to capture the author's overarching unstated thesis: that the shift to adversarial law, despite its progressive reputation, actually reinforced state control by alienating the public through professionalization.
This option correctly captures the implicit main point of the passage. The author spends the first paragraph establishing the traditional view (that the shift was a triumph of individual rights), but uses the remainder of the passage to dismantle this view. The author argues that professionalization (paragraph two) and epistemological alienation (paragraph three) ultimately allowed the state to evolve and insulate its power (paragraph four). Only this option successfully synthesizes these distinct arguments into the single, overarching conclusion that the passage builds toward.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the overall rhetorical structure of the passage.
The first paragraph sets up a 'traditional narrative' (the shift was a triumph of rights) which the subsequent three paragraphs systematically deconstruct, indicating the author is presenting a historical counter-narrative.
Identifying the shift from an attributed view to the author's own perspective is essential for determining the main point.
2
Distill the core argument of each of the author's supporting paragraphs.
Paragraph 2 argues the new system created an exclusionary professional guild; Paragraph 3 argues it alienated people from their own narratives; Paragraph 4 concludes this allowed the state to maintain and insulate its control.
Because the main point is implicit and dispersed, each major premise must be identified before they can be comprehensively synthesized.
3
Synthesize the individual premises into a single, overarching thesis statement.
The author is arguing that contrary to popular belief, the shift to adversarial law ultimately reinforced state power by using legal professionalization to distance the public from the judicial process.
The main point of a complex passage must encompass all the major arguments without overextending beyond the passage's specific scope.
4
Evaluate the given options against the synthesized thesis.
The option stating that the transition strengthened state authority by alienating the public and interposing a specialized legal profession perfectly matches the synthesized thesis.
Distractors in main point questions frequently rely on misattributing viewpoints, isolating subsidiary premises, or broadening the scope too far.

Anahtar Kavram

Synthesizing an implicit main point from a dispersed argument structure
Soru 2345Soru →

Archival conservation standards establish the following protocols for historical documents:
- Any manuscript treated with an aqueous deacidification bath contains alkaline buffer residues.
- If an archival item contains alkaline buffer residues, it cannot be safely housed in a standard cellulose acetate enclosure.
- Every manuscript housed in cold-storage vault Gamma is either a parchment codex or a document that was treated with an aqueous deacidification bath.
- No parchment codex contains alkaline buffer residues.
- Item M-402 is an archival document housed in cold-storage vault Gamma and is safely housed in a standard cellulose acetate enclosure.

Based on the information above, which of the following statements must be true? (Select all that apply)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Item M-402 is a parchment codex.; Item M-402 was not treated with an aqueous deacidification bath.

Cevap

The statements that must be true are that Item M-402 is a parchment codex and that Item M-402 was not treated with an aqueous deacidification bath.
Because Item M-402 is safely housed in a standard cellulose acetate enclosure, the contrapositive of the enclosure rule establishes that it does not contain alkaline buffer residues. In turn, the contrapositive of the deacidification rule proves that Item M-402 was not treated with an aqueous deacidification bath. Finally, because all manuscripts in vault Gamma must either be parchment codices or have received an aqueous deacidification bath, disjunctive elimination confirms that Item M-402 must be a parchment codex.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine the chemical residue status of Item M-402 using contrapositive reasoning.
Item M-402 does not contain alkaline buffer residues.
The stimulus establishes that containing alkaline buffer residues prevents safe housing in standard cellulose acetate enclosures. Because Item M-402 is safely housed in such an enclosure, the contrapositive guarantees it lacks alkaline buffer residues.
2
Evaluate whether Item M-402 underwent an aqueous deacidification bath.
Item M-402 was not treated with an aqueous deacidification bath.
The stimulus states that any manuscript treated with an aqueous deacidification bath contains alkaline buffer residues. Since Item M-402 has no alkaline buffer residues, the contrapositive establishes that it was not treated with such a bath.
3
Apply disjunctive syllogism to the vault Gamma inventory constraints.
Item M-402 must be a parchment codex.
Every manuscript in vault Gamma must be either a parchment codex or a document treated with an aqueous deacidification bath. Because Item M-402 is in vault Gamma and was not treated with an aqueous deacidification bath, it must be a parchment codex.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive chaining through contrapositive derivation and disjunctive syllogism
Soru 2346Soru →

Passage A and Passage B discuss the historical relationship between alchemy and early modern chemistry.

Passage A
Historians have traditionally characterized the birth of modern chemistry as a sudden, rationalist triumph over the superstitious mysticism of alchemy. This triumphalist narrative, however, fundamentally misrepresents the historical record and obscures the profound methodological continuity between the two fields. The laboratory practices of the seventeenth-century alchemists were not haphazard magical rituals, as they are so often caricatured by modern commentators, but rather highly structured, iterative experimental protocols. Working painstakingly in early laboratories, alchemists meticulously documented their processes of distillation, crystallization, and sublimation, effectively developing a robust empirical methodology designed to isolate and purify foundational substances. When pioneering chemists of the eighteenth century began to systematize the study of matter, they did not invent a new experimental paradigm ex nihilo; rather, they directly appropriated the rigorous laboratory techniques, standardized measurements, and empirical observations pioneered by their alchemical predecessors. The true conceptual breakthrough of early chemistry was primarily theoretical—a reinterpretation of existing chemical data—while its empirical bedrock and practical toolkit were decidedly alchemical in origin. Recognizing this historical debt requires us to view the scientific revolution not as a sudden fracture, but as a gradual, cumulative translation of alchemical empiricism into a new theoretical idiom.

Passage B
A recent trend among historians of science seeks to rehabilitate alchemy as a legitimate precursor to modern chemistry, frequently pointing to the shared use of laboratory equipment as evidence of an unbroken intellectual lineage. This revisionism, while perhaps well-intentioned in its desire to democratize the history of science, obscures the profound epistemological chasm that definitively separates the two disciplines. It is undeniably true that early chemists utilized the exact same retorts, crucibles, and furnaces that alchemists had employed for centuries to boil and condense liquids. However, scientific paradigms are defined not by their physical apparatus or superficial actions, but by their fundamental ontological commitments and their exacting standards of evidence. Alchemical practice was inextricably bound to a qualitative, metaphysical framework aimed at spiritual transmutation, where material changes were interpreted merely as physical manifestations of cosmic sympathies and astrological alignments. In stark contrast, the 'chemical revolution' of the late eighteenth century introduced a rigorously quantitative paradigm—most notably through the strict application of the principle of the conservation of mass. This newly secularized science demanded precise weight balances, rigorous peer verification, and reproducible results entirely stripped of any teleological purpose. To argue that chemistry is merely a continuous evolution of alchemy because both disciplines involved heating substances in glassware is to dangerously confuse technical craftsmanship with genuine scientific inquiry. The emergence of modern chemistry was not a natural progression of alchemical practices, but a radical methodological and conceptual rupture.

Based on the views outlined in Passage B, how would the author of Passage B most likely respond to the assertion in Passage A that pioneering chemists "directly appropriated the rigorous laboratory techniques and empirical observations pioneered by their alchemical predecessors"?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: By conceding its accuracy regarding the inheritance of physical tools, but criticizing its attempt to elevate mere technical craftsmanship into a continuous empirical methodology.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that the author would respond by conceding its accuracy regarding the inheritance of physical tools, but criticizing its attempt to elevate technical craftsmanship into a continuous methodology.
The correct response perfectly captures Author B's nuanced argument. Author B concedes that physical laboratory tools were passed down from alchemists to chemists (validating the factual basis of Author A's claim regarding laboratory techniques). However, Author B explicitly argues against elevating this shared 'technical craftsmanship' to the level of genuine 'scientific inquiry' or a shared methodology, which directly contradicts Author A's conclusion that there was a continuous 'empirical methodology.'

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the specific assertion made in Passage A.
Passage A asserts that early chemists 'directly appropriated the rigorous laboratory techniques and empirical observations pioneered by their alchemical predecessors,' suggesting a profound methodological continuity.
Understanding the exact claim being evaluated is necessary before determining Author B's hypothetical reaction to it.
2
Examine Author B's perspective on the relationship between alchemy and early chemistry.
Author B acknowledges that early chemists used the 'exact same retorts, crucibles, and furnaces' as alchemists, but vehemently argues that this shared equipment does not constitute an intellectual or methodological lineage.
Author B's specific textual concessions and counterarguments form the basis for their hypothetical response.
3
Synthesize Author B's view to formulate a direct response to Author A's assertion.
Author B would recognize Author A's point about shared laboratory practices but would argue Author A is confusing 'technical craftsmanship with genuine scientific inquiry,' thereby denying any true empirical or methodological continuity.
A valid cross-author inference requires applying one author's explicit framework to the other author's specific claim.

Anahtar Kavram

Cross-Author Inference: Projecting one author's explicitly stated framework onto a specific claim made by the other author to determine agreement, disagreement, or nuanced critique.
Soru 2347Soru →

For each of the following brief argumentative excerpts, identify the statement that most accurately characterizes its central logical defect by matching each excerpt with its corresponding flaw description.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Mayor: The city council must either approve the proposed commercial zoning ordinance or allow downtown retail to collapse entirely. Because allowing downtown retail to collapse is unacceptable, the council must pass the ordinance.
Publicist: Our firm possesses a legal right to free expression. Because doing what is right cannot be subject to moral condemnation, no one can legitimately criticize our promotional campaign.
Historian: Dr. Vance, an internationally recognized authority in quantum physics, asserts that Bronze Age agrarian trade networks were exclusively riverine. Therefore, we should accept that these ancient trade networks were exclusively riverine.
Architect: Every individual structural beam selected for this municipal pavilion is exceptionally lightweight. It follows that the finished pavilion structure will itself be exceptionally lightweight.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The excerpt regarding municipal zoning matches the description of treating two extremes as the only options; the excerpt regarding the publicist matches the description of conflating legal entitlement with moral correctness; the excerpt regarding ancient trade networks matches the description of appealing to an expert outside their field; and the excerpt regarding pavilion beams matches the description of improperly attributing a property of parts to the whole structure.
Each excerpt demonstrates a classic, well-defined reasoning error: the zoning argument overlooks other solutions by setting up an artificial either/or dichotomy; the publicist argument equivocates on the meaning of 'right'; the history argument relies on an authority speaking outside their specialty; and the pavilion argument commits the composition error by presuming the whole possesses the characteristics of its individual parts.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze each argumentative excerpt to identify its underlying premises, stated conclusion, and structural logical gap.
Excerpt 1 forces an either-or dichotomy; Excerpt 2 equivocates on the word 'right'; Excerpt 3 appeals to an unqualified authority; Excerpt 4 commits a composition fallacy (part-to-whole).
Accurately diagnosing the logical fallacy in each excerpt requires isolating how the premises fail to establish the conclusion.
2
Evaluate the abstract flaw descriptions on the right to find the unique match for each diagnosed logical gap.
Each excerpt aligns precisely with one abstract description without ambiguity.
Matching requires pairing concrete argumentative reasoning with standard formal fallacy descriptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying informal and formal fallacies in short arguments, including false dilemma, equivocation, appeal to inappropriate authority, and fallacy of composition.
Soru 2348Soru →

Passage A
In recent years, the movement to rewild urban spaces has gained significant traction among city planners and environmental scientists alike. Rewilding—the process of reintroducing native flora and fauna to urban environments and allowing natural processes to reclaim developed land—offers undeniable ecological benefits. By replacing heavily manicured lawns and concrete plazas with native wildflowers and resilient shrubs, cities can rapidly support struggling pollinator populations, reduce urban heat islands, and dramatically improve local biodiversity. Furthermore, rewilding initiatives inherently reduce the need for chemical fertilizers, fossil-fuel-powered landscaping equipment, and excessive watering, thereby making urban landscapes significantly more sustainable and resilient to climate change. Critics of this movement often argue that rewilded spaces appear messy, overgrown, or unkempt. However, this outdated aesthetic preference for sterile, tightly controlled lawns must be discarded if we are to seriously address the ongoing global ecological crisis. When we prioritize native ecosystems over manicured lawns, we recognize that cities are not separate from nature, but are part of a larger ecological network that must be sustained. The primary function of urban green spaces should be ecological support and habitat restoration, not mere visual uniformity or the preservation of traditional landscape architecture.

Passage B
While the ecological arguments for urban rewilding are well-documented and frequently championed in contemporary urban design circles, its most zealous proponents often ignore the vital social and psychological functions that traditional urban parks provide to city residents. Traditional parks, characterized by their open, closely manicured lawns, paved pathways, and clear sightlines, are deliberately designed to facilitate human recreation, safety, and community gathering. Families play sports on the open grass, community groups host large picnics, and individuals feel inherently safe walking through open spaces where visibility is high and potential hazards are easily spotted. Dense, unmanaged vegetation, which characterizes almost all major rewilding projects, can severely deter these essential human activities. It physically restricts usable recreational space and can create secluded, overgrown environments where local residents feel unsafe due to drastically limited visibility. City planners must remember that urban parks are fundamentally public amenities intended for human use and civic engagement. A city's livability depends on providing its citizens with spaces designed for leisure, socialization, and respite from the urban density, rather than attempting to replicate wilderness where human habitation is most concentrated. Transforming them into inaccessible, dense nature reserves severely compromises their primary utility as accessible, welcoming recreational spaces for the community.

Statement:
Based on the passages provided, the author of Passage A would agree with the assertion made in Passage B that the primary utility of urban parks is to serve as accessible recreational spaces for the community.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The statement is definitively false because the two authors have directly opposing views on the primary purpose of urban parks. Author B asserts that the primary utility of these areas is to serve as 'accessible, welcoming recreational spaces for the community.' In direct contrast, Author A explicitly states that 'the primary function of urban green spaces should be ecological support and habitat restoration.' Therefore, Author A would strongly disagree with Author B's assessment.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core assertion made by Author B regarding urban parks.
Author B asserts that urban parks are fundamentally public amenities whose primary utility is to serve as accessible, welcoming recreational spaces for the community.
To accurately define the claim from Passage B that Author A is being asked to evaluate.
2
Identify Author A's stated position on the primary function of urban green spaces.
Author A explicitly states that 'The primary function of urban green spaces should be ecological support and habitat restoration'.
To establish Author A's perspective as the basis for the cross-author inference.
3
Compare Author A's position to Author B's assertion.
Author A's prioritization of ecological support directly contradicts Author B's prioritization of human recreational use.
To determine whether Author A would agree or disagree with the statement, thus resolving the question as false.

Anahtar Kavram

Cross-Author Inference
Soru 2349Soru →

The following argumentative excerpts from distinct policy debates each commit a characteristic logical error. Which description on the right correctly identifies the primary reasoning vulnerability of each argument on the left?

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Marine Archaeologist: The university's endowment committee refused to fund our deep-sea excavation on the grounds that deep-water sonar surveys are purely speculative ventures. However, all scientific inquiry begins with speculative hypotheses about unknown phenomena. Therefore, the committee's refusal to fund scientific research is logically inconsistent with academic exploration.
Arborist: City council must immediately order the total removal of every non-native Norway maple across the metropolitan parks. If we do not eradicate every single one of these trees this season, our entire indigenous forest ecosystem will inevitably suffer total collapse within a decade.
Curator: We can definitively date this newly discovered parchment codex to the mid-fourth century BCE. Dr. Vance, the nation's foremost constitutional trial attorney, examined the document's legal phrasing and concluded that it must have originated in that exact era.
Energy Analyst: During the petroleum crises of the 1970s, deep-borehole geothermal extraction was prohibitively expensive compared to fossil fuels. Consequently, geothermal generation will never be economically viable as a baseload power source for modern electrical grids.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The marine archaeologist's argument pairs with trading on an ambiguity between high financial risk and theoretical conjecture; the arborist's argument pairs with failing to consider intermediate courses of action between two extreme alternatives; the curator's argument pairs with relying on the testimony of an expert whose expertise is not relevant to the subject matter; and the energy analyst's argument pairs with treating an economic limitation that held true under past technological conditions as an inherent constraint that must persist indefinitely.
Each argument contains an identifiable logical gap: the excavation argument commits equivocation by altering the definition of 'speculative'; the park arborist sets up a false dichotomy between complete eradication and total collapse; the curator commits an appeal to inappropriate authority by using a trial lawyer to date ancient manuscripts; and the geothermal analyst commits a temporal fallacy by projecting historical 1970s conditions into permanent future truths.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the marine archaeologist's argument for structural flaws
The archaeologist shifts the meaning of 'speculative' from financial investment risk (the committee's usage) to scientific theorizing (academic inquiry), committing equivocation.
Identifying the semantic shift correctly matches this argument with the description regarding ambiguity between financial risk and theoretical conjecture.
2
Analyze the arborist's argument for structural flaws
The arborist assumes an extreme either/or scenario: either complete eradication of non-native trees occurs immediately, or complete ecological ruin results.
This unwarranted bifurcation matches the description regarding failure to consider intermediate alternatives.
3
Analyze the curator's argument for structural flaws
The curator establishes an artifact's physical age solely on the assessment of a constitutional litigator rather than a paleographer or historical linguist.
Citing an authority outside their field of expertise matches the description regarding reliance on irrelevant expertise.
4
Analyze the energy analyst's argument for structural flaws
The analyst takes historical cost data from the 1970s and asserts that geothermal power will never be viable in the future.
Projecting past historical limitations into permanent constraints matches the temporal fallacy description.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Fallacy Archetypes in Argumentative Reasoning
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
Soru 2350Soru →

At the Maritime History Museum, every ship model constructed prior to 1850 is housed in a climate-controlled glass display case. Furthermore, any artifact housed in a climate-controlled glass display case is inspected weekly for humidity damage. No artifact inspected weekly for humidity damage is permitted to be loaned out for traveling exhibitions.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No ship model at the Maritime History Museum constructed prior to 1850 is permitted to be loaned out for traveling exhibitions.

Cevap

No ship model at the Maritime History Museum constructed prior to 1850 is permitted to be loaned out for traveling exhibitions.
The correct option is derived by combining the given conditional rules into a single unbroken chain: if an artifact is a pre-1850 ship model, it must be housed in a climate-controlled case; if it is in such a case, it must receive weekly humidity inspections; and if it receives weekly humidity inspections, it is not permitted to be loaned for traveling exhibitions. Therefore, no pre-1850 ship model can be loaned for traveling exhibitions.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify and translate the conditional premises into formal logical rules
Rule 1: Pre-1850 ship model → Climate-controlled case; Rule 2: Climate-controlled case → Weekly humidity inspection; Rule 3: Weekly humidity inspection → NOT permitted for traveling exhibitions.
Isolating each conditional relationship clarifies the valid deductive pathways available.
2
Connect the conditional statements into a continuous chain
Pre-1850 ship model → Climate-controlled case → Weekly humidity inspection → NOT permitted for traveling exhibitions.
The necessary condition of each preceding premise matches the sufficient condition of the subsequent premise.
3
Derive the valid deductive conclusion connecting the first term to the last
Pre-1850 ship model → NOT permitted for traveling exhibitions (i.e., no pre-1850 ship model is permitted to be loaned out for traveling exhibitions).
Transitive deduction strictly guarantees this conclusion without requiring any external assumptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Conditional Chaining and Deductive Inference
Tahmini Süre:50s
Soru 2351Soru →

Paleoclimatologist: Core samples extracted from the Ellesmere Ice Shelf reveal an abrupt spike in micro-charcoal particle density dating to approximately 8,200 years ago. Because regional boreal forests produce high concentrations of airborne charcoal only during prolonged periods of severe drought and wildfire, researchers conclude that a catastrophic multi-decade megadrought afflicted the adjacent subarctic mainland during this era.

Which of the following statements, if true, most undermine the paleoclimatologist's conclusion? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Around 8,200 years ago, annual snowfall over the Ellesmere Ice Shelf dropped by over 80 percent, dramatically reducing ice accumulation and concentrating standard atmospheric particulates into dense bands.; Geochemical analysis of the micro-charcoal in the ice layers shows an elemental composition characteristic of basaltic volcanic combustions from a distant ocean ridge rather than organic wood fires.

Cevap

The statements establishing that a severe reduction in snowfall concentrated baseline atmospheric particles and that the charcoal originated from volcanic basalt rather than forest combustion both undermine the conclusion.
The argument assumes that an elevated density of charcoal particles in the ice core must reflect increased mainland forest burning caused by drought. The statement regarding reduced snowfall demonstrates an accumulation artifact where low precipitation concentrates normal baseline particles into high-density layers without any increase in fire activity. Similarly, the statement identifying a volcanic origin demonstrates that the charcoal did not come from burning boreal trees, severing the link to mainland forest conditions.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion and core premises of the argument.
The premise is that an ice core shows a spike in micro-charcoal density and boreal forests produce high airborne charcoal during severe drought; the conclusion is that a catastrophic megadrought afflicted the adjacent mainland.
Isolating the conclusion allows detection of the key assumptions linking charcoal density in ice to regional drought conditions.
2
Identify the unstated assumptions and vulnerabilities in the author's reasoning.
The author assumes that high particle density reflects higher total charcoal output rather than an ice-accumulation artifact, and that the charcoal necessarily originated from regional mainland forest fires.
Weaken questions require identifying logical gaps or alternative explanations that break the link between the evidence and the conclusion.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to identify all statements that introduce facts undermining these key assumptions.
The statement showing reduced snowfall caused particle concentration and the statement showing a volcanic origin for the charcoal each independently undermine the author's causal claim.
Both findings provide alternative explanations that account for the data without requiring a mainland drought.

Anahtar Kavram

Alternative Causal Explanations and Data Measurement Confounders
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 2352Soru →

Consider the following argument:

Organizational Psychologist: In an initiative to curtail administrative burnout, a regional hospital network automated its patient intake record-keeping across half of its clinics, while the remaining clinics retained manual data entry. Over the subsequent eighteen months, clinicians at clinics with automated intake reported a 40 percent reduction in administrative fatigue, whereas clinicians at manual clinics reported no change. Thus, automating patient intake records is an effective method for reducing clinician administrative fatigue.

Evaluate whether the following statement is true or false:

The psychologist's conclusion is substantially undermined if, concurrent with the trial period, the hospital network systematically reassigned the most complex, documentation-intensive chronic care patients exclusively to the clinics retaining manual intake.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The evaluated statement is correct in asserting that the argument is substantially weakened. The psychologist infers a direct causal relationship between intake automation and reduced clinician fatigue from a comparative study between automated and manual clinics. However, if the hospital network simultaneously shifted the most documentation-heavy cases away from automated clinics and into manual clinics, the automated clinics experienced an inherent decrease in overall paperwork demands independent of the software. This introduces a major confounding factor that explains the survey results without requiring the software to be effective, thereby undermining the author's causal claim.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the stimulus argument into premises and main conclusion
Premise: Automated clinics saw a 40% reduction in fatigue, while manual clinics saw 0%. Conclusion: Automating patient intake is effective at reducing clinician administrative fatigue.
Isolating the core causal claim is essential for evaluating potential vulnerabilities in the reasoning.
2
Identify the unstated causal assumption in the argument
The author assumes that the two groups of clinics were comparable in all other respects affecting administrative workload and that no confounding variable accounts for the observed drop in fatigue.
Causal arguments rely on the assumption that alternative explanations and confounding differences between comparison groups have been ruled out.
3
Evaluate the impact of the supplementary fact on the causal claim
Reassigning complex, documentation-heavy patients exclusively to manual clinics means the automated clinics had a lighter paperwork burden regardless of software efficiency, presenting a viable alternative cause for their reduced fatigue.
Providing a strong rival explanation for the observed outcome directly weakens a causal conclusion.
4
Determine the truth value of the evaluation statement
Because the supplementary fact demonstrates a classic confounding variable flaw and weakens the conclusion, the statement asserting that it substantially undermines the argument is True.
Matching the weakening effect to the statement's claim confirms its validity.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying confounding variables and alternative explanations to weaken a causal inference
Soru 2353Soru →

Match each argument with the fundamental unstated assumption required for its conclusion to be logically justified.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Archaeologist: A newly excavated clay tablet from ancient Susa bears financial ledger inscriptions in an unusual cuneiform script. Because no scribal school records from Susa mention this script, it must have been developed by visiting merchants rather than local resident scribes.
Urban Planner: Commuters in Metroville will reduce their overall carbon emissions next year if the city replaces its municipal diesel bus fleet with electric buses powered exclusively by the regional power grid.
Software Director: Programmers at our studio who switched from standard physical keyboards to ergonomic split keyboards reported a 40 percent decrease in wrist strain over six months. Therefore, ergonomic split keyboards effectively reduce wrist strain.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The ancient script argument matches the assumption regarding comprehensive scribal documentation; the municipal transit argument matches the assumption regarding electrical grid carbon emissions; and the programmer ergonomics argument matches the assumption excluding alternative workplace factors.
Each paired statement represents an assumption strictly necessary for its respective argument to hold under the Negation Test. In the ancient script argument, claiming that the script was not developed locally because it does not appear in scribal school records depends on the assumption that local development would have resulted in such records. In the urban transit argument, concluding that switching to grid-powered electric buses reduces carbon emissions requires assuming that electricity generation does not offset these savings with equal or greater emissions. In the ergonomic keyboard argument, attributing the reduction in wrist strain to split keyboards depends on assuming that other contemporaneous factors were not primarily responsible.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and premises for each argument.
Each argument draws a causal or explanatory conclusion from an observational premise, leaving an unstated logical gap.
Isolating the gap between stated evidence and the conclusion reveals what the author takes for granted.
2
Apply the Negation Test to identify which unstated premise is strictly required.
For each correct pair, negating the assumption makes it logically impossible for the premise to justify the conclusion.
A necessary assumption is one whose falsity fatally undermines the argument.
3
Pair each argument with its corresponding necessary presupposition.
Each argument is matched with the precise condition required to defend its conclusion against an obvious vulnerability.
To form valid, necessary pairings across all items.

Anahtar Kavram

A necessary assumption is an unstated premise required for an argument's conclusion to hold; if the assumption is negated, the argument fails.
Soru 2354Soru →

According to municipal aquifer management regulations, any commercial facility operating in the Green River basin that extracts more than 50,000 gallons of groundwater daily is classified as a Tier-1 consumer. Every Tier-1 consumer is required to install digital ultrasonic flow meters on all active wellheads. Furthermore, any facility required to install digital ultrasonic flow meters must submit to an annual hydrologic audit. Clearwater Brewing operates in the Green River basin and has not submitted to an annual hydrologic audit.

Statement: Clearwater Brewing does not extract more than 50,000 gallons of groundwater daily.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The conclusion is logically valid via modus tollens across a transitive chain: Extraction > 50,000 gallons leads directly to a mandatory audit; therefore, the absence of an audit necessitates that extraction cannot exceed 50,000 gallons.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Diagram the conditional premises provided in the regulatory framework
Extracts >50,000 gallons daily → Tier-1 consumer → Required to install ultrasonic flow meters → Required to submit to annual hydrologic audit.
Establishing the linked conditional relationships clarifies what is logically necessitated by high-volume extraction.
2
Form the contrapositive of the complete conditional chain
No annual hydrologic audit → Not required to install ultrasonic flow meters → Not a Tier-1 consumer → Does not extract >50,000 gallons daily.
A conditional statement is logically equivalent to its contrapositive.
3
Apply the factual information regarding Clearwater Brewing to the contrapositive
Since Clearwater Brewing has not submitted to an annual hydrologic audit, it must be true that it does not extract more than 50,000 gallons of groundwater daily.
Matching the given condition to the contrapositive guarantees the conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Chaining and Contrapositive Inference
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 2355Soru →

Passage A
For decades, antitrust enforcement has been unduly constrained by the "consumer welfare" standard, which evaluates market dominance almost exclusively through the lens of price effects and output. This narrow framework ignores the broader legislative intent behind foundational antitrust statutes, which were designed to disperse economic power and protect democratic institutions from being undermined by monopolistic behemoths. A market structure dominated by a few massive firms can stifle innovation and exert undue political influence, even if it temporarily delivers lower prices to consumers. Therefore, antitrust analysis must return to its structuralist roots, evaluating mergers and corporate conduct based on their potential to concentrate power, rather than relying solely on abstract economic models of efficiency.

Passage B
The shift toward the consumer welfare standard in antitrust law marked a necessary evolution from the subjective, unpredictable enforcement of the mid-twentieth century. Before this standard, regulators often punished efficient firms simply for being large, protecting less efficient competitors at the expense of the public. By focusing strictly on economic efficiency—specifically, whether corporate behavior harms consumers through higher prices or reduced quality—the consumer welfare standard provides courts with a rigorous, objective metric. Introducing vague, inherently political goals, such as the "dispersion of power," would abandon this rigor. It would transform antitrust law from a predictable economic tool into a subjective weapon for social engineering, ultimately chilling the fierce competition that drives economic growth.

Based on the passages, the authors of Passage A and Passage B disagree over whether a highly concentrated market structure can ever result in lower prices for consumers.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

The statement is false because both authors acknowledge that concentrated markets can deliver lower prices, though they disagree on whether this price efficiency is the only metric that matters.
The correct answer is false because Author A explicitly concedes that concentrated markets can deliver lower prices ('even if it temporarily delivers lower prices'), aligning with Author B's view that large firms can be economically efficient. Their disagreement lies in the legal significance and sufficiency of those lower prices, not their existence.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the specific proposition in the question stem.
The core proposition to evaluate is: 'a highly concentrated market structure can ever result in lower prices for consumers.'
Accurately identifying the exact point of contention is necessary before checking the authors' stances.
2
Examine Passage A's stance on this proposition.
Author A states that a market dominated by massive firms can exert undue influence 'even if it temporarily delivers lower prices to consumers.'
To determine if Author A rejects the idea that monopolies can lower prices.
3
Examine Passage B's stance on this proposition.
Author B supports the consumer welfare standard and implies that large, efficient firms often benefit the public by avoiding higher prices.
To determine if Author B accepts the idea that large firms can lower prices.
4
Compare the two stances.
Both authors accept the premise that large corporate size/concentration can correlate with lower prices. Therefore, they do not disagree on this specific statement.
To determine the truth value of the overall statement regarding their disagreement.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing between an author's main conclusion and their conceded premises in comparative reading.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 2356Soru →

City Planner: Last year, the city converted one vehicular traffic lane on Market Street into a protected bicycle lane. Over the subsequent twelve months, total retail sales along Market Street increased by 15 percent. Because the bicycle lane increased foot and bicycle traffic directly in front of storefronts, installing dedicated bicycle lanes on commercial corridors is an effective method for boosting local business revenue.

Which of the following statements, if true, each undermine the city planner's conclusion? (Select all that apply.)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: During the same twelve-month period, broader regional economic growth caused retail sales across the entire city to rise by an average of 20 percent.; Six months before the bicycle lane was installed, the city reopened a major subway station on Market Street following an extensive two-year renovation.

Cevap

The statements showing that citywide retail sales grew even faster (20 percent) due to general economic growth and that a major subway station reopened on Market Street following renovations each weaken the argument.
The conclusion asserts a direct causal link between the bicycle lane and increased business revenue. The argument is undermined by statements providing plausible alternative explanations: the finding that citywide retail grew by 20 percent indicates Market Street actually underperformed general market trends, and the reopening of a major subway station provides a distinct source of increased foot traffic.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and the supporting evidence in the stimulus.
The author concludes that installing dedicated bicycle lanes boosts local business revenue, based solely on the correlation between the lane installation and a 15 percent sales increase on Market Street.
Weaken questions require identifying the gap between the stated evidence and the final causal claim.
2
Evaluate each choice to identify alternative explanations or confounding factors.
Two choices introduce external factors—a citywide economic boom and the reopening of a central transit hub—that explain the sales increase independently of the bicycle lane.
Demonstrating that an effect is likely attributable to another cause undermines a causal conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Causal reasoning and identifying alternative explanations for an observed correlation
Soru 2357Soru →

Agricultural researchers monitored test plots of drought-stressed legumes under varying soil and management conditions. In every plot where mycorrhizal fungal colonization exceeded 40 percent, root nodule nitrogen fixation remained stable throughout the dry season. However, no plot that received synthetic nitrogen fertilizer achieved mycorrhizal fungal colonization above 25 percent. In the southern test valley, all plots managed under the regenerative protocol maintained stable root nodule nitrogen fixation throughout the dry season, but several of these regenerative plots had received synthetic nitrogen fertilizer.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: At least some legume plots with mycorrhizal fungal colonization of 25 percent or less maintained stable root nodule nitrogen fixation throughout the dry season.

Cevap

At least some legume plots with mycorrhizal fungal colonization of 25 percent or less maintained stable root nodule nitrogen fixation throughout the dry season.
The stimulus establishes that several regenerative plots in the southern valley received synthetic fertilizer. By the rule that no plot receiving synthetic fertilizer exceeds 25 percent colonization, these specific plots must have had colonization rates of 25 percent or less. Because all regenerative plots in that valley maintained stable nitrogen fixation throughout the dry season, these specific plots maintained stable fixation despite having colonization rates at or below 25 percent. Thus, it is logically guaranteed that at least some plots with colonization of 25 percent or less maintained stable nitrogen fixation.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Extract and formalize the factual premises from the stimulus
Premise 1: Fungal colonization > 40% guarantees stable nitrogen fixation. Premise 2: Synthetic fertilizer guarantees fungal colonization <= 25%. Premise 3: All southern valley regenerative plots had stable nitrogen fixation, and some of these plots received synthetic fertilizer.
Isolating the formal relationships prevents conflating sufficient conditions with necessary conditions.
2
Synthesize the premises regarding the subset of southern valley regenerative plots that received synthetic fertilizer
The regenerative plots that received synthetic fertilizer must have fungal colonization <= 25% (by Premise 2). At the same time, because they are regenerative plots in the southern valley, they maintained stable nitrogen fixation (by Premise 3).
Combining these specific constraints produces a deductively guaranteed overlap.
3
Derive the valid deductive inference
There exist plots (specifically, the fertilized southern valley regenerative plots) that had fungal colonization <= 25% while maintaining stable nitrogen fixation.
This matches the statement that at least some plots with colonization of 25% or less maintained stable nitrogen fixation.

Anahtar Kavram

Quantifier Intersection and Sufficient vs. Necessary Conditions
Tahmini Süre:1m 20s
Soru 2358Soru →

Analyze the four logically flawed arguments below. Map each individual argument to the abstract theoretical description that most precisely diagnoses its foundational reasoning vulnerability.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

The philosopher asserts that human morality is governed by natural laws. Yet, a law is fundamentally a directive issued by a recognized authoritative body. Hence, the philosopher's assertion inadvertently presupposes a supreme legislator, despite his explicitly secular framework.
The mayor insists the new municipal zoning ordinance is fully equitable. Equity inherently requires maximizing the overall economic prosperity of a municipality, an objective this specific ordinance achieves far better than any proposed alternative. Thus, the ordinance clearly constitutes an equitable policy.
Over the past fiscal decade, the proportion of our national budget allocated to infrastructure maintenance has steadily and measurably decreased. It is therefore evident that the government is currently spending less money on maintaining public infrastructure than it did ten years ago.
The foundation of the historic central library is severely compromised. We must either immediately commence a complete demolition and reconstruction or permanently close the facility to the public. Because a complete reconstruction is financially unfeasible this year, the facility must be permanently closed.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The philosopher's argument pairs with the equivocation description; the mayor's argument pairs with the necessary/sufficient confusion; the budget argument pairs with the percentage/amount flaw; and the library argument pairs with the false dilemma description.
Each argument contains a distinct, classic logical fallacy that maps perfectly to one abstract description. The philosopher equivocates on a central term; the mayor confuses necessary and sufficient conditions; the budget analyst conflates relative percentages with absolute amounts; and the library official presents a false dilemma.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the philosopher's argument to identify structural shifts.
The argument uses the word 'law' to mean a natural regularity, and then immediately defines 'law' as a human or divine edict.
Tracking key terms reveals the fallacy of equivocation.
2
Analyze the formal logic of the mayor's argument.
Premise 1: Equity -> Maximize Prosperity. Premise 2: Ordinance -> Maximize Prosperity. Conclusion: Ordinance -> Equity. This is a classic 'affirming the consequent' formal flaw.
Translating conditional language ('inherently requires') exposes necessary versus sufficient condition confusions.
3
Evaluate the quantitative jump in the budget argument.
The premise gives a metric in 'proportion' (percentage), but the conclusion claims a reduction in 'money' (absolute amount).
If the total budget expanded vastly over ten years, the absolute money spent could increase even while its percentage share of the budget shrank.
4
Examine the constraints of the library argument.
The argument forces a choice between two extreme poles (demolish vs. close forever) without proving these are the only options.
Identifying restrictive 'either/or' framing helps spot false exclusivity (false dilemmas).

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying abstract structural vulnerabilities in flawed arguments across various domains.
Soru 2359Soru →

According to the protocol of the Highfield Agricultural Research Station, every wheat cultivar that demonstrates drought resistance is selected for regional field trials. In addition, no wheat cultivar selected for regional field trials is treated with synthetic nitrogen fertilizers during testing. A newly developed cultivar, Solstice-9, demonstrated drought resistance at the station.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of them?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Solstice-9 is not treated with synthetic nitrogen fertilizers during testing.

Cevap

Solstice-9 is not treated with synthetic nitrogen fertilizers during testing.
The stimulus establishes a transitive conditional chain: drought resistance guarantees selection for regional field trials, and selection for field trials guarantees that no synthetic nitrogen fertilizer is applied during testing. Since Solstice-9 possesses drought resistance, it necessarily follows that Solstice-9 is not treated with synthetic nitrogen fertilizers during testing.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the stated conditional relationships and specific factual premise in the stimulus.
Premise 1: Drought Resistance → Selected for Regional Field Trials. Premise 2: Selected for Regional Field Trials → NOT Treated with Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizer. Fact: Solstice-9 has Drought Resistance.
Establishing the formal conditional rules is necessary to deduce valid deductive inferences.
2
Apply the conditional chain to the specific instance of Solstice-9.
Solstice-9 has Drought Resistance → Solstice-9 is Selected for Regional Field Trials → Solstice-9 is NOT Treated with Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizer.
A valid deductive syllogism combines universal conditional premises with a specific initiating fact.
3
Select the statement that directly matches the derived necessary conclusion.
The statement specifying that Solstice-9 is not treated with synthetic nitrogen fertilizers during testing is logically guaranteed.
Must Be True questions require a choice that is strictly provable from the premises without additional assumptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Two-step conditional chaining and deductive instantiation
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 2360Soru →

Premises:
- Every manuscript acquired by the Crestview Historical Society that was created prior to 1700 undergoes spectral imaging before being placed on public exhibition.
- The illuminated manuscript Codex Solaris was created in 1640 and was acquired by the Crestview Historical Society.
- The Codex Solaris is currently on public exhibition at the Crestview Historical Society.

Statement:
Based on the premises above, the Codex Solaris underwent spectral imaging before being placed on public exhibition.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement is true because it is a direct deductive consequence of the premises. The stimulus establishes that every manuscript acquired by the society and created before 1700 undergoes spectral imaging before exhibition. Since the Codex Solaris was acquired by the society, created in 1640, and is exhibited, the imaging procedure must have taken place.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formalize the conditional rule established in the stimulus.
Rule: (Acquired by Crestview Society) AND (Created prior to 1700) AND (Placed on public exhibition) → Underwent spectral imaging prior to exhibition.
Identifying the formal structure of the universal premise allows for direct deductive application.
2
Evaluate the facts concerning the Codex Solaris against the antecedent conditions.
The Codex Solaris is acquired by the society, was created in 1640 (which is prior to 1700), and is currently on public exhibition.
All necessary triggers for the conditional rule are fully satisfied by the specific subject.
3
Deduce the necessary outcome.
The Codex Solaris must have undergone spectral imaging prior to exhibition; thus, the statement is conclusively True.
Applying modus ponens directly yields the guaranteed factual conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Universal conditional deduction (Modus Ponens)
ÖncekiSayfa 118 / 198Sonraki
Tüm alıştırma soruları — LSAT | Examkin