Tüm alıştırma soruları

HR Director: Every engineer assigned to the new Alpha Project team is a recognized expert who has individually produced highly efficient, bug-free code on past solo assignments. Because the team is composed exclusively of such exceptional programmers, the team as a whole will undoubtedly produce highly efficient, bug-free software.

The reasoning in the HR Director's argument is flawed in that it:

Recent debates within literary studies have increasingly polarized around the methodological divide between New Formalism and Historical Poetics. New Formalist critics posit that literary forms possess an autonomous, vital agency, effectively shaping historical contexts rather than merely serving as passive reflections of them. These critics indict older, rigid historicist models for reducing literature to an epiphenomenal symptom of broader socioeconomic forces. Conversely, proponents of Historical Poetics contend that New Formalism relies on an impoverished, transhistorical conception of 'form' that ignores the diachronic instability of literary devices. From the vantage of Historical Poetics, the cognitive habits and interpretive frameworks of readers are strictly historically contingent; thus, a sonnet read in the nineteenth century cannot be said to perform the same cultural work as its sixteenth-century counterpart. However, this historicist critique itself risks a discrete form of reductionism. By insisting that a text's formal elements are entirely circumscribed by the contemporaneous reading practices of its original audience, Historical Poetics struggles to articulate a coherent framework for the enduring, unmediated aesthetic resonance that ancient texts frequently exert upon modern readers—a phenomenon that New Formalists effortlessly attribute to the intrinsic, transhistorical endurance of literary form.

Which of the following inferences about the proponents of Historical Poetics is most strongly supported by the passage?

Below are five distinct logical arguments. Identify which of these arguments contains a reasoning error where a condition required to produce a given result is mistakenly treated as guaranteeing that result, or where a condition that guarantees a result is mistakenly treated as a requirement for it. Select all that apply.

Read the following passage concerning historical scholarship on ancient writing systems:

For nearly half a century following Sir Arthur Evans's 1900 excavation of the Bronze Age palace at Knossos, scholarship on the Linear B script was constrained by Evans's dogmatic insistence that the inscriptions represented a language entirely distinct from Greek. Evans's categorization of the script as an indigenous 'Minoan' tongue led researchers to seek linguistic parallels among Etruscan and Near Eastern languages, stalling progress for decades. A pivotal methodological shift occurred when classicist Alice Kober eschewed speculative cross-linguistic phonetic comparisons, focusing instead on internal structural patterns within the untranslated texts. Kober identified recurring three-sign groupings—subsequently termed 'Kober's triplets'—that exhibited regular variations in their final signs while maintaining identical root characters, thereby demonstrating that the underlying language was inflectional. Building upon this structural foundation, architect Michael Ventris constructed a syllabic grid mapping consonant-vowel intersections, initially postulating an Etruscan substrate. However, when Ventris systematically tested hypothetical Greek vowel values against the inflectional endings identified by Kober, coherent grammatical forms emerged. The definitive confirmation of Ventris's Greek hypothesis arrived with the analysis of tablet PY Ta 641 from Pylos, where the phonetic inscription 'ti-ri-po-de' appeared directly adjacent to a pictographic ideogram of a three-legged cauldron, conclusively demonstrating that Linear B recorded an archaic Mycenaean Greek dialect.

Based on the passage above, match each textual detail with the statement that most accurately characterizes its specific rhetorical function in the author's account.

For decades following Sylvanus Morley’s foundational studies, Mayanist consensus maintained that Classic Maya monumental inscriptions were exclusively astronomical and ritual calendars recording esoteric cycles, devoid of references to actual historical events. This paradigm began to unravel in 1960 with Tatiana Proskouriakoff’s landmark structural analysis of the stelae at Piedras Negras. Rather than attempting phonetic decipherment, Proskouriakoff organized the monuments chronologically and noticed that they were grouped into distinct spatial clusters, each associated with a specific seated figure carved within a niche. Crucially, Proskouriakoff observed that the span of time commemorated between the earliest and latest dedication dates in any given cluster never exceeded sixty-four years—a duration roughly corresponding to the upper limits of a human lifespan. By correlating these temporal boundaries with specific recurrent glyphic sequences, she demonstrated that the inscriptions recorded the accession, military triumphs, and deaths of mortal dynastic rulers rather than timeless cosmological deities.

In the context of the passage, the author's observation that dedication dates within a cluster never spanned more than sixty-four years serves primarily to:

If a geological stratum features extensive iridium anomalies, it must have been exposed to extraterrestrial impact debris. Any stratum exposed to extraterrestrial impact debris will exhibit widespread microtektite deposits. Since the newly excavated Tyra Formation exhibits no microtektite deposits, it cannot feature extensive iridium anomalies.

Which of the following arguments exhibits a logical structure most similar to that of the argument above?

Below are four flawed logical arguments and four abstract descriptions of reasoning errors. Match each argument on the left with the precise description of its composition or division flaw on the right.

Passage:
In her 1940s cytogenetic investigations of Zea mays, Barbara McClintock challenged the prevailing consensus that genetic loci were immutable by demonstrating that mutable kernel variegation resulted from mobile controlling elements. Conventional geneticists had long attributed variegated kernel patterns to unstable chemical mutations occurring at fixed chromosomal loci. McClintock refuted this orthodoxy by documenting recurrent, non-random physical breakages at a specific site on chromosome 9, which she designated the Dissociation (Ds) locus, occurring whenever a second regulatory element, Activator (Ac), was present.

Statement: In the passage, the author references the physical breakages at the Dissociation (Ds) locus primarily to provide observable cytological evidence that links physical chromosomal movement to phenotypic variation, thereby challenging the model of fixed-locus chemical mutations.

Art Authenticator: To be considered a genuine landscape by the 17th-century master Valerius, a painting must feature his signature technique of layering translucent glazes over a monochrome underpainting. A newly discovered painting of a coastal scene has been thoroughly analyzed by conservators, who found that it was created using exactly this layering technique. Therefore, the coastal scene is undoubtedly a genuine work by Valerius.

Which of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the art authenticator's reasoning?

When a community shifts from a nomadic lifestyle to a settled agricultural one, their vocabulary for describing permanent geographic features typically expands significantly. However, linguistic studies of the Xilari people, who transitioned to agriculture three centuries ago, show that their vocabulary for permanent geographic features is smaller than that of their nomadic neighbors, the Yulari. Records indicate that the Xilari settled in a highly uniform, flat basin, whereas the Yulari migrate annually through a diverse mountain range.

Based on the information provided, which of the following statements are most strongly supported? (Select all that apply)

Consider the formal logic utilized in the following two arguments:

Argument A: A city will be selected to host the global summit only if it significantly upgrades its public transportation network. The city of Oakhaven has significantly upgraded its public transportation network. Therefore, Oakhaven will be selected to host the global summit.

Argument B: Only if a patient strictly adheres to the prescribed dietary regimen will the new therapeutic protocol be effective. The patient in Ward 4 did not strictly adhere to the prescribed dietary regimen. Therefore, the new therapeutic protocol will not be effective for this patient.

Statement: The logical structure of Argument B exactly parallels the logical structure of Argument A.

Match each everyday argument to the formal logical description that most accurately represents its valid deductive structure.

Match each flawed argument to the statement that most accurately describes the logical error committed in its reasoning.

Historian: The recent declassification of the embassy's internal memos from the 1960s reveals that the ambassador was fully aware of the impending coup weeks before it occurred. Since the ambassador took no action to warn the host government, it is clear that our nation's foreign policy secretly favored the success of the coup.

Archivist: You are misinterpreting those memos. While they do indicate the ambassador's awareness of the coup plot, the lack of a warning was merely adherence to standard diplomatic protocol at the time to avoid interfering in domestic affairs, not an endorsement of the coup.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the point at issue between the historian and the archivist?

The following argument excerpts rely on various patterns of reasoning. Which of the following arguments exhibit a logical flaw wherein a necessary condition is confused with a sufficient condition? Select all that apply.

Legal scholars often characterize the Second Circuit’s *Computer Associates v. Altai* decision as a fatal blow to copyright protection for software architecture. In establishing the abstraction-filtration-comparison test, *Altai* mandates that courts dissect a program and "filter out" elements dictated by efficiency or external hardware constraints before comparing the remainder to the allegedly infringing work. Detractors argue that this rigorous filtration inevitably atomizes a program, systematically blinding courts to the creative synthesis required to assemble standard, unprotectable routines into a complex operational whole. This objection, however, rests on a conflation of the test's analytic mechanics with its jurisdictional reach. *Altai’s* filtration framework governs only the infringement analysis of non-literal elements as discrete entities; it expressly preserves traditional "compilation" copyright, under which the specific selection and arrangement of otherwise unprotectable elements retains statutory protection. Thus, the requirement to isolate unprotected elements does not implicitly sanction the wholesale appropriation of architectural design, but rather forces plaintiffs to articulate the exact locus of their originality rather than relying on a program's monolithic complexity.

Which of the following best describes the primary function of the author's reference to "traditional 'compilation' copyright" in the passage?

Match each argument on the left with the piece of counter-evidence on the right that most effectively weakens its conclusion.

Sociologist: A recent study of corporate professionals reveals a strong positive correlation between the number of hours an individual spends reading fiction per month and their demonstrated empathy in collaborative settings. Therefore, the habit of reading fiction directly enhances a person's capacity for empathy.

Evaluate the following statement as true or false:

The introduction of new data showing that professionals who spend comparable hours reading exclusively non-fiction literature do not exhibit these elevated levels of empathy actively weakens the sociologist's argument.

Passage:
In the emerging discipline of soundscape ecology, Bernie Krause proposed the Acoustic Niche Hypothesis (ANH), positing that vocalizing organisms in mature, undisturbed biomes partition the acoustic spectrum by pitch, frequency band, and temporal window to minimize acoustic interference. Whereas traditional bioacoustics historically examined the calls of individual species in isolation—often treating ambient acoustic competition as background noise—the ANH posits that entire biophonies function as interconnected, highly structured systems. To substantiate this premise, soundscape researchers point to recordings from undisturbed Bornean rainforest canopies, where cicadas, anurans, and hornbills consistently broadcast in distinct, non-overlapping acoustic strata throughout the dawn chorus. Skeptics maintain that such spectral segregation could merely be an incidental consequence of physiological differences—specifically, that disparate body sizes dictate resonant vocal frequencies—rather than evidence of active ecological co-adaptation. Nonetheless, recent field trials demonstrating that certain avian species actively adjust their pitch when competitor bands are occupied suggest that acoustic partitioning is a dynamic, coordinated phenomenon.

The author's reference to the "undisturbed Bornean rainforest canopies" serves primarily to do which of the following?

In each of the following scenarios, a speaker's original argument is followed by a flawed rebuttal. Match each original argument to the rebuttal that commits a 'straw man' fallacy by explicitly exaggerating or distorting the speaker's original position.