Tüm alıştırma soruları

3960 soru

Soru 3081Soru →

If a language is to be classified as belonging to the Altaic family, it must feature vowel harmony and lack grammatical gender. The newly documented Vattian language features grammatical gender. Therefore, the Vattian language cannot be classified as belonging to the Altaic family.

Which of the following arguments is most similar in its logical structure to the argument above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: If a chemical compound is to be categorized as an alkali, it must neutralize acids and be soluble in water. Copper(II) oxide is not soluble in water. Therefore, copper(II) oxide cannot be categorized as an alkali.

Cevap

The argument about categorizing a chemical compound as an alkali perfectly parallels the logical structure of the stimulus.
The correct answer perfectly mirrors the valid Modus Tollens structure of the stimulus. The stimulus argues: If A, then B and C; Not C; Therefore, Not A. The correct option argues: If Alkali, then Neutralize Acids AND Soluble in Water; Not Soluble in Water; Therefore, Not Alkali. Both rely on absolute certainty and the failure of one part of a compound necessary condition to trigger a valid contrapositive.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the logical structure of the stimulus.
Structure: If A (Altaic), then B (vowel harmony) AND C (lack gender). Premise 2: Not C (has gender). Conclusion: Therefore, Not A.
Identifying the abstract deductive architecture is necessary to find the parallel argument.
2
Determine the validity and features of the stimulus argument.
The argument is a valid application of Modus Tollens against a compound necessary condition. It uses absolute quantifiers ('must').
The correct answer must replicate the exact same validity, structure, and degree of certainty.
3
Evaluate the options against the abstract structure (If A -> B and C; ~C -> ~A).
The chemical compound option matches: If A (alkali), then B (neutralize) AND C (soluble). Premise 2: Not C (not soluble). Conclusion: Not A (not alkali).
This confirms the structural and logical equivalence without being distracted by subject matter.

Anahtar Kavram

Parallel Valid Structure (Modus Tollens with Compound Necessary Conditions)
Soru 3082Soru →

Match each of the following everyday arguments to the formal description of its underlying valid logical architecture.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

If a commercial aviation route is to remain financially viable in the long term, it must maintain a consistent passenger load factor of at least eighty percent. The direct flight between Oakhaven and Riverton has failed to maintain this passenger load factor over the past two years. Therefore, this direct flight will not remain financially viable in the long term.
To mitigate the ongoing urban heat island effect, the city planning commission must either implement a widespread green roof mandate or completely overhaul the public transit infrastructure. Due to severe budget constraints, overhauling the transit infrastructure is impossible. Thus, the commission must implement the green roof mandate.
Any comprehensive cybersecurity framework that successfully prevents unauthorized data exfiltration necessitates implementing zero-trust network architecture. Moreover, implementing zero-trust network architecture inherently increases the administrative overhead for IT departments. Therefore, successfully preventing data exfiltration requires an increase in administrative overhead.
Every manuscript written by the medieval scholar Al-Kindi that has survived to the present day contains marginalia added by later Byzantine scribes. The recently authenticated document found in the monastery archives is a surviving manuscript written by Al-Kindi. Consequently, this newly authenticated document contains Byzantine marginalia.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct pairings identify the aviation argument as Modus Tollens, the urban planning argument as Disjunctive Syllogism, the cybersecurity argument as Chain Conditionals, and the manuscript argument as Universal Instantiation.
Each argument utilizes a formally valid deductive structure. By stripping away the domain-specific vocabulary and substituting logical variables, the underlying frameworks of Modus Tollens, Disjunctive Syllogism, Chain Conditionals, and Universal Instantiation perfectly align with their respective abstract descriptions.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Abstract the subject matter of the aviation argument into logical notation.
If V (viable) -> L (load factor). Not L. Therefore, Not V. This matches the description of identifying the absence of a necessary condition.
Translating the argument into formal logic reveals its underlying Modus Tollens structure.
2
Examine the urban planning argument for structural keywords like 'either/or'.
G (green roof) OR O (overhaul). Not O (impossible). Therefore, G. This matches the description of presenting two alternatives and eliminating one.
Identifying disjunctions and eliminations isolates a Disjunctive Syllogism.
3
Track the flow of conditions in the cybersecurity argument.
P (prevents) -> Z (zero-trust). Z -> A (administrative overhead). Therefore, P -> A. This aligns with establishing a sequence of requirements.
Following the conditional chain isolates the Hypothetical Syllogism structure.
4
Determine if the manuscript argument links general principles or applies a rule to a specific entity.
All M (manuscripts) have B (marginalia). D (document) is an M. Therefore, D has B. This aligns with applying a universal characteristic to a distinct entity.
Differentiating between general rules and specific applications isolates Universal Instantiation.

Anahtar Kavram

Parallel Valid Structure requires abstracting the logical architecture of an argument away from its specific subject matter to identify foundational valid deduction patterns.
Soru 3083Soru →

Corporate Strategist: A successful product launch in today’s highly saturated technology sector always requires an aggressive, well-funded marketing campaign. VertexCorp has just initiated an unprecedentedly aggressive, multi-million-dollar marketing campaign for its upcoming enterprise software suite. Therefore, despite the fierce competition in the industry, we can be highly confident that VertexCorp's new software suite will experience a remarkably successful product launch.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the corporate strategist's reasoning?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: It treats a condition that is necessary for a successful product launch as though it were a condition that ensures a successful product launch.

Cevap

The correct answer accurately describes the argument treating a necessary condition as though it were a sufficient condition.
The argument explicitly states that a successful launch 'requires' an aggressive marketing campaign, establishing marketing as a necessary condition. It then observes that VertexCorp has satisfied this requirement and flawedly concludes that success is therefore highly confident (treating marketing as a sufficient condition or guarantee). The correct option accurately diagnoses this illegal reversal.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conditional premise in the stimulus.
The premise is: A successful product launch requires an aggressive marketing campaign (Successful Launch → Aggressive Marketing).
Mapping the conditional logic establishes the baseline rules the argument must follow.
2
Identify the secondary premise and the conclusion.
Secondary premise: VertexCorp has an aggressive marketing campaign. Conclusion: VertexCorp will have a successful launch.
This shows how the author attempts to apply the conditional rule to a specific scenario.
3
Evaluate the logical transition from premises to conclusion.
The author affirms the necessary condition (Aggressive Marketing) and uses it to erroneously guarantee the sufficient condition (Successful Launch).
This is a classic 'Illegal Reversal' flaw.
4
Match the identified flaw with the abstract descriptions in the answer choices.
The correct answer perfectly translates the Illegal Reversal into abstract terms: treating a condition that is necessary as though it were one that ensures (is sufficient for) an outcome.
The correct option must precisely describe the structural error without introducing irrelevant critiques.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Illegal Reversal (Confusing Necessary and Sufficient Conditions)
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 3084Soru →

In the mid-twentieth century, the architectural movement known as Brutalism emerged not merely as a pragmatic response to postwar austerity, but as a robust ethical discourse. Proponents of Brutalism championed the use of *béton brut* (raw concrete), arguing that the unvarnished exposure of a structure's material reality and functional mechanics constituted a moral imperative of honesty. This transparency was intended to serve as a populist rebuke to the bourgeois deception inherent in decorative cladding and superficial ornamentation. Ironically, the phenomenological reception of these edifices by the general public inverted the architects' egalitarian intentions. To the laity, the monumental scale and uncompromising textures of Brutalist structures were overwhelmingly interpreted as hostile, opaque, and emblematic of bureaucratic alienation. Ultimately, the movement's obsolescence was catalyzed not by structural deficiencies or fiscal constraints, but by this intractable semiotic schism: the designers' structural vocabulary of social transparency was inextricably decoded by occupants as a language of authoritarian indifference.

Based on the passage, which of the following inferences regarding Brutalism and its reception are most strongly supported by the text? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The Brutalist architects viewed the obfuscation of a building's structural framework as an inherently deceptive architectural practice.; The movement's obsolescence demonstrates that the objective physical properties of raw materials do not intrinsically convey the ethical intentions of their designers.

Cevap

The correct inferences are that Brutalist architects viewed structural obfuscation as deceptive, and that the movement's fate shows physical materials do not intrinsically convey a designer's ethical intent.
The correct inferences follow directly from the text's explicit statements. First, the architects explicitly linked exposed materials with 'honesty' and cladding with 'deception,' which logically supports the inference that hiding a structure is inherently deceptive to them. Second, the 'semiotic schism' where the architects' intended message of 'transparency' was decoded by the public as 'opaque' directly proves that the raw physical materials do not inherently carry or guarantee the designers' moral intent.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the passage to identify the architects' core philosophy.
The architects equated exposed structure with 'honesty' and decorative cladding with 'bourgeois deception'.
Understanding the architects' premise is necessary to evaluate inferences about their views on architectural practices.
2
Analyze the passage to identify the public's reaction and the cause of the movement's decline.
The public interpreted the intended 'transparent' structures as 'opaque' and 'hostile', leading to a 'semiotic schism' that ended the movement.
Understanding the contrast between intent and reception helps evaluate inferences about meaning and materiality.
3
Evaluate each option strictly against the boundaries of the text.
Options claiming the architects found obfuscation deceptive and that materials don't guarantee intent are fully supported. Options projecting public preference for cladding, successful cost reductions, or inevitable outcomes for all movements violate text boundaries.
LSAT reading comprehension requires eliminating choices that rely on outside knowledge, extreme language, or unsupported logical leaps.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying logically sound inferences without relying on unsupported leaps or extreme generalizations.
Tahmini Süre:3m 0s
Soru 3085Soru →

Read the following passage concerning twentieth-century atmospheric science:

In 1985, atmospheric scientists Joseph Farman, Brian Gardiner, and Jonathan Shanklin published ground-based measurements from the Halley Bay station showing severe springtime ozone losses over Antarctica—a finding that initially provoked skepticism because NASA’s Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) aboard the Nimbus-7 satellite had reported no such anomaly. Subsequent re-examination revealed that TOMS’s automated data-processing algorithms had been programmed to flag ozone measurements below 180 Dobson units as anomalous instrument errors and automatically suppress them from summary reports. Farman’s team, by contrast, relied on manually calibrated Dobson spectrophotometers, whose readings were verified through repeated direct optical measurements rather than automated statistical filtering. While some critics initially attributed the Halley Bay measurements to localized meteorological fluctuations specific to the polar vortex, the revelation of the satellite algorithm's data-rejection threshold quickly shifted the scientific consensus, proving that the apparent discrepancy was an artifact of over-automated computational screening rather than empirical error on the ground.

Match each excerpt from the passage to the specific rhetorical function it serves in the author's discussion.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

"NASA’s Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) aboard the Nimbus-7 satellite had reported no such anomaly"
"automated data-processing algorithms had been programmed to flag ozone measurements below 180 Dobson units as anomalous instrument errors"
"repeated direct optical measurements rather than automated statistical filtering"
"localized meteorological fluctuations specific to the polar vortex"

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The excerpt regarding the satellite instrument reporting no anomaly matches the function of identifying conflicting data that caused initial skepticism. The excerpt detailing the automated filtering threshold matches the function of explaining the computational mechanism behind the satellite's omission. The excerpt highlighting direct optical measurements matches the function of providing methodological justification for the ground findings. The excerpt citing polar vortex fluctuations matches the function of presenting an alternative physical hypothesis advanced by skeptics.
Each textual excerpt serves a distinct structural purpose in the author's exposition: the first excerpt establishes the empirical basis for initial peer skepticism; the second excerpt reveals the procedural cause of the satellite's data omission; the third excerpt defends the methodological integrity of the ground-based researchers; and the fourth excerpt illustrates an alternative hypothesis offered by skeptics.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural role of the satellite anomaly reference in the opening sentence.
The satellite data is cited immediately after the mention of scientific skepticism to explain why other researchers doubted the ground-based discovery.
Determining why the author introduced the satellite data establishes its functional relationship to the passage's central narrative.
2
Analyze the structural role of the data-processing algorithm details in the second sentence.
This detail explains the cause of the discrepancy by identifying how the satellite software discarded legitimate low values.
Connecting this detail to the discrepancy resolves why the opposing evidence existed.
3
Analyze the structural role of the manual calibration and optical measurement detail in the third sentence.
This detail defends the ground team's methodology, showing why their data was trustworthy despite contradicting automated instruments.
Contrasting the methods demonstrates the author's defense of the ground observations.
4
Analyze the structural role of the localized meteorological fluctuations detail in the final sentence.
This detail illustrates a competing theory offered by critics before the satellite error was uncovered.
Recognizing the concession to critics clarifies that it represents an alternative hypothesis that was ultimately superseded.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing the rhetorical function of specific supporting details within an academic argumentative passage.
Soru 3086Soru →

Below are five distinct argument excerpts. Which of the following arguments exhibit reasoning that is flawed specifically because it confuses a necessary condition for a sufficient one, or mistakes a sufficient condition for a necessary one? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Any viable alternative to fossil fuels must be both economically scalable and environmentally benign. Because the proposed geothermal expansion project is highly economically scalable and completely benign to the local environment, it is guaranteed to be a viable alternative to fossil fuels.; If a regulatory framework imposes stringent reporting requirements on small businesses, economic innovation in that sector is inevitably stifled. The newly proposed municipal framework explicitly exempts small businesses from any stringent reporting requirements. Therefore, implementing this proposed framework will not stifle economic innovation.

Cevap

The arguments regarding the geothermal expansion project and the proposed municipal regulatory framework both commit conditional logic flaws.
The correct selections both demonstrate classic conditional reasoning flaws. The geothermal expansion argument commits an illegal reversal by assuming that meeting all the necessary requirements for a viable energy alternative is enough to guarantee viability. The regulatory framework argument commits an illegal negation by assuming that avoiding one specific sufficient cause of stifled innovation guarantees that innovation will not be stifled, ignoring other potential causes.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the question stem to determine the exact type of logical flaw being requested.
The stem explicitly asks for arguments that confuse necessary and sufficient conditions, which includes illegal reversals and illegal negations.
Identifying the target flaw is essential before evaluating the options.
2
Evaluate the geothermal expansion argument for conditional logic flaws.
The argument translates to: 'Viable -> Scalable AND Benign'. It then states 'Scalable AND Benign' and concludes 'Viable'. This is an illegal reversal.
This matches the target flaw by treating necessary conditions as sufficient.
3
Evaluate the legislation argument for conditional logic flaws.
The argument translates to: 'Pass -> Unanimous Support'. It then states 'Passed' and concludes 'Unanimous Support'. This is valid reasoning (Modus Ponens).
A valid argument cannot be the correct answer when asked to identify a flaw.
4
Evaluate the regulatory framework argument for conditional logic flaws.
The argument translates to: 'Stringent Requirements -> Innovation Stifled'. It then states 'NOT Stringent Requirements' and concludes 'NOT Innovation Stifled'. This is an illegal negation.
This matches the target flaw by treating a sufficient condition as a necessary one.
5
Evaluate the remaining arguments to ensure they do not contain the target flaw.
The stress/sleep argument mistakes correlation for causation. The budget argument confuses percentages with absolute numbers. Neither involves a necessary vs. sufficient conditional flaw.
We must verify that no other options fit the criteria to confirm our final selections.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary vs. Sufficient Condition Flaws (Illegal Reversal and Illegal Negation)
Soru 3087Soru →

Analyze the flawed conditional reasoning in the arguments on the left and pair each with the precise diagnostic description of its logical error on the right.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Acquiring a commercial broadcasting license requires compliance with federal bandwidth regulations, and one can comply with these regulations only by utilizing adaptive signal encryption. Thus, any broadcaster who utilizes adaptive signal encryption will successfully acquire a commercial broadcasting license.
Whenever a municipal government issues municipal bonds, public infrastructure spending increases. Moreover, increased public infrastructure spending invariably leads to temporary localized inflation. Therefore, if a municipal government refrains from issuing municipal bonds, temporary localized inflation will not occur.
Unless a theoretical physicist publishes in peer-reviewed journals, their hypotheses will not gain traction in the academic community. Dr. Kael has published numerous papers in elite peer-reviewed journals this year, guaranteeing that her new hypotheses will gain widespread academic traction.
Any novel algorithm that optimally compresses genomic data will fundamentally transform bioinformatics. The 'K-Fold' algorithm, despite its computational complexity, does not optimally compress genomic data. Consequently, the 'K-Fold' algorithm will fail to fundamentally transform bioinformatics.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The arguments map to the flaws as follows: The broadcasting license argument maps to presuming a necessary condition for a prerequisite is sufficient. The municipal bonds argument maps to inferring nonoccurrence from the absence of a chain-initiating condition. The physicist argument maps to treating a condition without which an outcome cannot be achieved as definitively securing it. The algorithm argument maps to concluding a result cannot occur because a sufficient condition is lacking.
Each argument commits a specific variation of confusing necessary and sufficient conditions. The broadcasting argument performs a reversal on a chain of conditions. The bonds argument performs a negation on a chain. The physicist argument performs a simple reversal based on an 'unless' statement. The algorithm argument performs a simple negation.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the broadcasting license argument.
Translates to: License→ComplianceLicense \rightarrow Compliance, and Compliance→EncryptionCompliance \rightarrow Encryption. Conclusion: Encryption→LicenseEncryption \rightarrow License. This maps to the description involving a necessary condition for a prerequisite being treated as sufficient.
Identifying the formal logic structure (Chain Reversal) isolates its specific abstract description.
2
Analyze the municipal bonds argument.
Translates to: Bonds→Spending→InflationBonds \rightarrow Spending \rightarrow Inflation. Conclusion: ∼Bonds→∼Inflation\sim Bonds \rightarrow \sim Inflation. This maps to the description involving inferring the nonoccurrence of an ultimate consequence from the absence of an initiating condition.
Identifying the formal logic structure (Chain Negation) isolates its specific abstract description.
3
Analyze the theoretical physicist argument.
Translates to: ∼Publish→∼Traction\sim Publish \rightarrow \sim Traction, which contraposes to Traction→PublishTraction \rightarrow Publish. Conclusion: Publish→TractionPublish \rightarrow Traction. This maps to the description of treating a condition without which an outcome cannot be achieved (necessary) as one that definitively secures it (sufficient).
Properly diagramming 'unless' statements is required to spot the standard Illegal Reversal.
4
Analyze the genomic algorithm argument.
Translates to: Compress→TransformCompress \rightarrow Transform. Conclusion: ∼Compress→∼Transform\sim Compress \rightarrow \sim Transform. This maps to the description of concluding a result cannot be brought about because a sufficient condition is lacking.
Identifying the standard Illegal Negation isolates its matching diagnostic description.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary vs. Sufficient Condition Flaws
Tahmini Süre:3m 0s
Soru 3088Soru →

Consider the following excerpt regarding the academic controversy over the Roman text known as the *Historia Augusta*:

For centuries, classical scholars accepted the *Historia Augusta*—a notoriously scandalous compilation of Roman imperial biographies—as precisely what it claimed to be: the collective output of six distinct authors writing during the reigns of Diocletian and Constantine. This orthodox consensus remained virtually unchallenged until 1889, when Hermann Dessau advanced the explosive thesis that the entire corpus was actually a clandestine literary hoax perpetrated by a single anonymous author writing nearly a century later. To substantiate his revisionist chronology, Dessau illuminated severe anachronisms embedded within the text; most notably, he demonstrated that the purportedly early-fourth-century biographer 'Vopiscus' casually referenced the administrative subdivisions of Gaul, which historical records confirm were not implemented until the reign of Theodosius I. Moreover, Dessau scrutinized the text's myriad fabricated letters and senatorial decrees. While these forged inclusions ostensibly served to simulate documentary rigor and authenticate the narrative, Dessau argued they actually betrayed the text's true origin, reflecting the rhetorical preoccupations of the Roman pagan aristocracy in their twilight struggle against Christian hegemony. Early twentieth-century traditionalists fiercely resisted this 'single-author' paradigm, insisting that the biographies' conspicuously varying rhetorical personas—some austere, others highly sensational—precluded the possibility of a lone creator. Ultimately, however, modern computerized stylometric analyses have vindicated Dessau; by tracking the uniform distribution of rare syntactical function words beneath the superficial stylistic fluctuations, researchers have confirmed the presence of a solitary, idiosyncratic hand at work.

Based on the passage, match each cited textual detail (Left Items) to its primary rhetorical or structural function within the author's argument (Right Items).

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

The reigns of Diocletian and Constantine
The administrative subdivisions of Gaul
Fabricated letters and senatorial decrees
Varying rhetorical personas

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct matches are: 'The reigns of Diocletian and Constantine' aligns with establishing baseline temporal parameters; 'The administrative subdivisions of Gaul' aligns with the empirical instantiation of historical incongruities; 'Fabricated letters and senatorial decrees' aligns with narrative devices exposing the true socio-historical milieu; and 'Varying rhetorical personas' aligns with the stylistic diversity used by detractors to argue for composite origins.
In dense academic passages, details are deployed strategically to build, dismantle, or qualify arguments. 'Diocletian and Constantine' sets the contextual baseline. The 'subdivisions of Gaul' serves as Dessau's primary chronological weapon (anachronism) against that baseline. The 'fabricated letters' demonstrate the complex dual nature of the hoax (simulated rigor exposing true origins). Finally, the 'rhetorical personas' represent the counter-argument mounted by the traditionalist opposition. Matching requires abstracting these concrete textual moments into generalized descriptions of argumentative mechanics.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural role of the reference to 'the reigns of Diocletian and Constantine'.
The text states this is when the six authors purportedly wrote, representing the traditional belief held by classical scholars for centuries.
To accurately map the detail to its abstracted function: the establishment of the orthodox historical framework.
2
Analyze the structural role of 'the administrative subdivisions of Gaul'.
The text presents this as a 'severe anachronism' because Gaul was not subdivided until the reign of Theodosius I, contradicting the purportedly early-fourth-century author.
To map the detail to its function as a specific, empirical piece of evidence used to destabilize the orthodox timeline.
3
Analyze the structural role of 'fabricated letters and senatorial decrees'.
The passage notes these were intended to 'simulate documentary rigor' (superficial corroboration) but actually reflected the 'rhetorical preoccupations' of a later pagan aristocracy (the true milieu).
To map the detail to its dual function of attempting authentication while inadvertently revealing the true ideological agenda.
4
Analyze the structural role of 'varying rhetorical personas'.
Early twentieth-century traditionalists used these stylistic differences (austere vs. sensational) to 'fiercely resist' the single-author paradigm.
To map the detail to its function as the primary counter-evidence invoked by detractors defending the multiple-author consensus.

Anahtar Kavram

Function of Detail in Context
Soru 3089Soru →

A logging syndicate is granted access to the restricted reserve only if it employs sustainable harvesting techniques and passes an ecological impact audit. Passing this audit requires submitting a comprehensive wildlife protection plan. Apex Timber has not submitted a comprehensive wildlife protection plan. Thus, Apex Timber will definitely not be granted access to the restricted reserve.

Which of the following arguments is most similar in its pattern of reasoning to the argument above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: A museum will restore a Renaissance canvas only if it secures specialized funding and hires a master conservator. Hiring a master conservator necessitates paying an international relocation fee. The museum cannot pay the international relocation fee. Thus, the museum will definitely not restore the Renaissance canvas.

Cevap

The correct answer is the argument concerning the museum restoring a Renaissance canvas, as it perfectly replicates the logical structure and conclusion modality of the original argument.
The correct argument perfectly tracks the logical structure of the stimulus. It presents a necessary compound condition ('only if it secures specialized funding and hires a master conservator'), chains a part of that condition to a further requirement ('necessitates paying an international relocation fee'), denies that final requirement ('cannot pay...'), and validly concludes that the initial sufficient condition is entirely denied ('will definitely not restore').

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Diagram the formal logic of the stimulus.
Access granted -> (Sustainable techniques AND Passes audit). Passes audit -> Submits plan. Apex Timber did NOT submit plan. Conclusion: Apex Timber is NOT granted access.
Identifying the precise conditional relationships is required to find an identical structure.
2
Characterize the validity and modality of the stimulus.
The argument uses a valid Modus Tollens deduction across a nested conditional chain. The conclusion is framed with absolute certainty ('will definitely not').
A parallel argument must match not just the conditional structure, but also its logical validity and degree of certainty.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to find the exact structural match.
The museum argument dictates: Restore -> (Funding AND Conservator). Conservator -> Fee. No Fee. Conclusion: No Restore. This is a perfect match.
The correct option must replicate the 'A -> (B and C)', 'C -> D', 'Not D -> Not A' structure without introducing logical flaws.

Anahtar Kavram

Parallel Conditional Logic
Soru 3090Soru →

Every major atmospheric anomaly recorded in this region is either driven by oceanic surface temperatures or caused by stratospheric aerosol injection. Moreover, any anomaly caused by stratospheric aerosol injection invariably exhibits a delayed global cooling effect. The recent anomaly observed over the Pacific, however, has not exhibited a delayed global cooling effect. Therefore, the Pacific anomaly must be driven by oceanic surface temperatures.

Which of the following arguments is most similar in its logical structure to the argument presented above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Every native fern species in this forest either reproduces via spores or relies on vegetative fragmentation. Any species relying on vegetative fragmentation requires consistently damp soil to survive. The newly discovered Polypodium, a native fern in this forest, does not require consistently damp soil. Thus, the Polypodium must reproduce via spores.

Cevap

The argument about native fern species reproducing via spores or vegetative fragmentation.
The correct answer perfectly duplicates the valid deductive architecture of the stimulus. Both arguments follow this pattern: Every member of group X has characteristic Y or characteristic Z. Any member with characteristic Z also has characteristic W. A specific member of group X does not have characteristic W. Therefore, it does not have characteristic Z (Modus Tollens). Since it must have Y or Z, it must have characteristic Y (Disjunctive Syllogism).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the logical structure of the stimulus.
Premise 1: All A (anomaly) -> B (oceanic) OR C (aerosol). Premise 2: All C (aerosol) -> D (cooling). Premise 3: Instance P (Pacific) is A, and P is NOT D. Conclusion: P is B.
Identifying the formal abstract structure is the first step in finding a parallel argument.
2
Evaluate the validity of the stimulus.
The argument is valid. Since P is not D, by Modus Tollens (contrapositive of Premise 2), P is not C. Since P is an A, it must be B or C. Since it is not C, it must be B (Disjunctive Syllogism).
A valid stimulus must be matched with a valid answer choice.
3
Examine the answer choices to find an identical valid structure.
The correct choice must feature a universal rule ('Every/All') dividing a group into two possibilities, a conditional rule applying to one of those possibilities, a specific instance that fails the necessary condition of that rule, and a conclusion that the instance belongs to the other possibility.
Parallel reasoning requires matching quantifiers, premises, and logical mechanisms exactly.

Anahtar Kavram

Parallel Valid Structure (Universal Instantiation, Modus Tollens, Disjunctive Syllogism)
Soru 3091Soru →

Paleoclimatologists measure the ratio of oxygen-18 to oxygen-16 in the calcium carbonate shells of benthic foraminifera found in deep-sea sediment cores. Because water molecules containing the lighter oxygen-16 isotope evaporate more readily from the oceans and are subsequently trapped in continental ice sheets during glacial periods, a higher ratio of oxygen-18 to oxygen-16 in these deep-sea shells indicates a larger global ice volume at the time the shells were formed. Furthermore, the analysis of cores from the North Atlantic shows that during the last three glacial periods, the peak oxygen-18 to oxygen-16 ratio was reached approximately 5,000 years before the minimum sea surface temperatures were recorded in the same region. Which of the following statements are most strongly supported by the information above? (Select all that apply)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: During periods of extensive global glaciation, the ocean water from which benthic foraminifera construct their shells contains a lower concentration of oxygen-16 relative to oxygen-18 than it does during interglacial periods.; In the North Atlantic, the maximum extent of global ice volume during the last three glacial periods occurred before the ocean surface waters reached their coldest temperatures.

Cevap

The correct statements are that ocean water has a lower relative concentration of oxygen-16 during glaciations, and that the maximum global ice volume preceded the coldest ocean surface temperatures in the North Atlantic.
The correct choices directly follow from synthesizing the provided facts. First, because oxygen-16 is trapped in ice during glacial periods, the ocean water must logically have a lower concentration of oxygen-16 relative to oxygen-18 than it normally would. Second, because the peak isotope ratio indicates maximum ice volume, and this peak occurs 5,000 years before minimum temperatures, the maximum ice volume must occur before the ocean reaches its coldest temperatures.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the causal mechanism for isotope ratios.
Oxygen-16 evaporates and gets trapped in ice, leaving the oceans with a higher ratio of oxygen-18 to oxygen-16.
This establishes why deep-sea shells show different ratios during glacial versus interglacial periods.
2
Analyze the timeline presented in the text.
The peak isotope ratio (indicating maximum ice volume) happens roughly 5,000 years before the minimum sea surface temperatures.
This establishes the temporal sequence of events during the last three glacial periods.
3
Evaluate the choices against the strictly supported facts.
Only choices dealing with relative concentrations (ratios) and the timeline of events are supported. Choices dealing with absolute numbers, unstated causal relationships, or generalizations to other organisms are unsupported.
Most Strongly Supported questions require answers that can be proven or heavily deduced directly from the text without outside assumptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Synthesizing explicit premises to form a highly probable conclusion while avoiding ratio versus absolute amount and causation fallacies.
Soru 3092Soru →

Match each argument excerpt on the left with the abstract description of its logical flaw on the right.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

City Planner: The downtown revitalization project will be approved only if the federal grant is secured. We just received notice that the federal grant has been secured in full. Therefore, the downtown revitalization project is guaranteed to be approved.
Meteorologist: An atmospheric pressure drop of more than ten millibars is enough to cause a severe thunderstorm. Since the atmospheric pressure in our region has remained completely stable this week, we will definitely not experience a severe thunderstorm.
Manager: Whenever our software development team is given a flexible deadline, they successfully deliver a bug-free application. Therefore, the only way to ensure the team delivers a bug-free application is to provide them with a flexible deadline.
Safety Inspector: Unless the chemical storage tanks are inspected monthly, the facility will face a hazardous leak. The facility's management has rigorously ensured that the tanks are inspected every single month. Hence, the facility will absolutely not face a hazardous leak.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The City Planner matches the prerequisite flaw; the Meteorologist matches the absent sufficient cause flaw; the Manager matches the adequate condition flaw; and the Safety Inspector matches the precautionary measure flaw.
Each correct pair accurately identifies the specific directional error in conditional reasoning. The City Planner and Safety Inspector both treat necessary conditions as sufficient, but in distinct contexts (achieving a goal vs. preventing a disaster). The Manager and Meteorologist both treat sufficient conditions as necessary, but in distinct ways (claiming an adequate condition is the only way vs. inferring an event won't happen from the lack of a sufficient cause).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the City Planner's argument for conditional indicators.
The argument states 'only if' (identifying a necessary condition) and concludes a guarantee (treating it as a sufficient condition).
Identifying the directional error is required to match the argument to its abstract description.
2
Analyze the Meteorologist's argument for conditional indicators.
The argument states 'is enough' (identifying a sufficient condition) and concludes that its absence means the outcome will absolutely not occur.
This isolates the flaw of illicitly inferring the absence of a phenomenon from the lack of one sufficient cause.
3
Analyze the Manager's argument for conditional indicators.
The argument uses 'whenever' (identifying a sufficient condition) but concludes it is the 'only way' (treating it as a necessary condition).
This isolates the error of treating a condition proven to be adequate as a strict requirement.
4
Analyze the Safety Inspector's argument for conditional indicators.
The argument states 'unless' (identifying a necessary precaution) and concludes that meeting this precaution guarantees safety (treating it as a sufficient condition).
This isolates the specific flaw of treating a required precaution as a guaranteed prevention of an adverse event.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary vs. Sufficient Condition Flaws
Soru 3093Soru →

Identify the precise formal logical framework that accurately characterizes the deductive reasoning employed in each practical scenario below.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

If the deep-sea submersible's pressure seal is compromised, its internal diagnostic light flashes red. The internal diagnostic light is not flashing red. Therefore, the pressure seal is not compromised.
The main stage must be illuminated by either the overhead floodlights or the floor-level spotlights. The overhead floodlights have lost power. Thus, the stage must be illuminated by the floor-level spotlights.
If the sourdough is left at room temperature for over twelve hours, it will over-proof. If the dough over-proofs, the baked loaf will have an overly dense texture. So, leaving the sourdough at room temperature for over twelve hours ensures the baked loaf will have an overly dense texture.
Every main-sequence star fuses hydrogen into helium in its core. The celestial body Sirius A is a main-sequence star. Hence, Sirius A fuses hydrogen into helium in its core.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The submersible argument correctly matches denying the necessary condition. The stage lighting argument matches eliminating an alternative. The sourdough argument matches linking two conditional statements. The star argument matches applying a categorical characteristic to an individual.
Each practical scenario maps to exactly one fundamental valid deductive architecture. The submersible argument follows Modus Tollens (If A -> B. ~B. Therefore, ~A). The stage lighting argument follows Disjunctive Syllogism (A or B. ~A. Therefore, B). The sourdough argument follows Chain Conditionals (If A -> B, If B -> C. Therefore, If A -> C). The astrophysics argument follows Universal Instantiation (All A are B. X is A. Therefore, X is B).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the underlying structural components of the submersible argument.
The structure establishes an if-then premise, notes the 'then' outcome did not happen, and concludes the 'if' condition did not happen.
This isolates the formal valid deduction pattern known as Modus Tollens (denying the necessary condition).
2
Analyze the underlying structural components of the stage lighting argument.
The structure presents two mutually exclusive requirements, removes the first, and concludes the second must be true.
This identifies the pattern of Disjunctive Syllogism (eliminating an alternative).
3
Analyze the underlying structural components of the sourdough argument.
The structure introduces a condition leading to a middle outcome, which in turn leads to a final outcome, linking the very first condition to the very last outcome.
This demonstrates a Chain of Conditionals, also known as Hypothetical Syllogism.
4
Analyze the underlying structural components of the main-sequence star argument.
The structure provides a universal rule for an entire group and identifies a specific entity within that group, concluding the rule applies to the entity.
This matches the classic logical structure of Universal Instantiation.

Anahtar Kavram

Parallel Valid Structure
Soru 3094Soru →

Most of the ancient manuscripts discovered in the desert caves were written on parchment. However, none of the documents translated by Dr. Vance were written on parchment. It follows that most of the ancient manuscripts discovered in the desert caves were not translated by Dr. Vance.

Which one of the following arguments exhibits a pattern of reasoning most logically similar to that exhibited by the argument above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Most multinational corporations have implemented strict internal privacy protocols. No start-up tech companies have implemented strict internal privacy protocols. Thus, most multinational corporations are not start-up tech companies.

Cevap

The argument about multinational corporations and start-up tech companies perfectly parallels the logical structure of the stimulus.
The correct answer exactly mirrors the formal logic of the stimulus. It sets up a 'Most X are Y' relationship (Most multinational corporations have strict protocols) and a 'No Z are Y' relationship (No start-up tech companies have strict protocols), leading to the valid deduction 'Therefore, most X are not Z' (most multinational corporations are not start-up tech companies).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the logical structure of the stimulus.
Premise 1: Most A (manuscripts) are B (on parchment). Premise 2: No C (translated by Vance) are B (on parchment). Conclusion: Most A (manuscripts) are not C (translated by Vance).
Identifying the abstract formula of the argument is required before finding its parallel match.
2
Determine the validity of the original argument.
The argument is logically valid. Since none of C overlaps with B, the majority of A (which overlaps with B) cannot possibly overlap with C.
Parallel reasoning questions require matching both the exact quantifier structure and the argument's validity.
3
Evaluate the answer choices against the abstract formula: Most X are Y. No Z are Y. Therefore, most X are not Z.
Only the argument regarding multinational corporations matches this exact valid structure and quantifier sequence.
Eliminating options with mismatched quantifiers (Some, All) or invalid structural flaws (illegal reversals/negations) isolates the correct choice.

Anahtar Kavram

Parallel Quantifier Logic
Soru 3095Soru →

Stimulus Argument: If a coral reef is to fully recover from a severe bleaching event, it must be situated in a region with stable ocean temperatures. However, no reef can maintain stable ocean temperatures unless it is shielded from the primary equatorial currents. Thus, any coral reef that fully recovers from a severe bleaching event must be shielded from the primary equatorial currents.

Candidate Argument: If a newly published novel is to win the prestigious Sterling Prize, it must have sold over a million copies. Furthermore, a novel can sell over a million copies only if it has been adapted into a major motion picture. Therefore, any novel that has been adapted into a major motion picture will win the prestigious Sterling Prize.

Statement: The pattern of reasoning in the candidate argument is logically parallel to the pattern of reasoning in the stimulus argument.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False. The arguments are not logically parallel because the stimulus argument is valid, while the candidate argument commits a formal logical flaw.
The statement is false because the two arguments possess fundamentally different logical structures regarding their conclusions. The stimulus presents a valid transitive deduction (A → B, B → C, therefore A → C). While the candidate argument shares the premise structure (X → Y, Y → Z), it draws a flawed conclusion (Z → X), representing an illegal reversal.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Translate the stimulus argument into formal conditional logic.
Premise 1: Fully Recover → Stable Temperatures. Premise 2: Stable Temperatures → Shielded ('no B unless C' translates to B → C). Conclusion: Fully Recover → Shielded.
To identify the exact structural template and establish that the stimulus utilizes a valid transitive chain (A → B, B → C, therefore A → C).
2
Translate the candidate argument into formal conditional logic.
Premise 1: Win Prize → Million Copies. Premise 2: Million Copies → Adapted ('Y only if Z' translates to Y → Z). Conclusion: Adapted → Win Prize.
To map the candidate's logical flow and prepare it for structural comparison against the stimulus.
3
Compare the logical structures of the two arguments.
The stimulus correctly deduces A → C from its premises. The candidate incorrectly deduces C → A from its premises, reversing the sufficient and necessary conditions.
An argument containing a logical flaw (illegal reversal) cannot be parallel to an argument that is logically valid.

Anahtar Kavram

Parallel Conditional Logic: Analyzing and matching the formal symbolic structure and validity of natural language arguments, paying careful attention to the directionality of conditional conclusions.
Soru 3096Soru →

Philosophers of science have long grappled with the tension between the "no-miracles" argument—which asserts that the predictive success of scientific theories would be an inexplicable coincidence if they were not at least approximately true—and the "pessimistic meta-induction," which notes that historically successful theories, such as those positing phlogiston or the luminiferous ether, have repeatedly been discarded as fundamentally false. Attempting to reconcile these opposing intuitions, John Worrall proposed Epistemic Structural Realism (ESR). Worrall argues that while the ontological claims of discarded theories regarding the fundamental nature of reality are indeed abandoned, their mathematical structures are frequently retained by successor theories. To substantiate this, Worrall invokes the transition from Augustin-Jean Fresnel’s wave theory of light, which posited an elastic solid ether as the medium for light propagation, to James Clerk Maxwell’s electromagnetic theory. Although Maxwell discarded the ether entirely, he preserved Fresnel's equations. For Worrall, this continuity indicates that epistemic commitment should be restricted to the structural content of our best scientific theories rather than their assertions about unobservable entities.

Critics like Bas van Fraassen, however, argue that ESR collapses into either traditional scientific realism or mere instrumentalism, asserting that it is conceptually incoherent to cleanly abstract a theory's mathematical structure from its ontological commitments. From this perspective, the terms within Fresnel's equations derive their semantic content explicitly from the hypothesized ether, rendering their preservation in Maxwell’s theory merely a fortuitous formal overlap rather than an epistemic vindication of structural truth.

Which of the following best describes the primary function of the author's discussion of Fresnel's equations in the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: To provide a historical illustration of Worrall’s claim that the mathematical architecture of a theory can endure the refutation of its underlying ontological framework.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that the detail provides a historical illustration of Worrall's claim that a theory's mathematical architecture can endure the refutation of its underlying ontological framework.
The correct answer accurately identifies that the author introduces Fresnel's equations specifically to substantiate John Worrall's argument. In the first paragraph, Worrall’s Epistemic Structural Realism posits that while the ontological claims of discarded theories are abandoned, their mathematical structures are retained. The author explicitly frames the transition from Fresnel's wave theory to Maxwell's electromagnetic theory as Worrall’s chosen historical illustration of this phenomenon.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the specific question being asked.
The question asks for the primary rhetorical function of the reference to Fresnel's equations within the broader context of the passage.
Function questions require identifying why the author included a detail to build their argument, not merely summarizing what the detail says.
2
Locate the detail in the text and read its surrounding context.
Fresnel's equations are introduced in the middle of the first paragraph, immediately following Worrall's proposition of Epistemic Structural Realism.
The structural role of a detail is defined by the specific claim it immediately precedes or follows.
3
Determine the structural relationship between the detail and the preceding argument.
The text states 'To substantiate this, Worrall invokes the transition from Augustin-Jean Fresnel’s wave theory...'. This shows the example functions as a substantiation for Worrall's specific claim that mathematical structures are retained while ontologies are discarded.
Identifying transitional phrases ('To substantiate this') reveals the logical architecture of the paragraph.
4
Evaluate the options against this identified function.
The correct option must describe the detail as an illustration, example, or substantiation of Worrall's philosophical claim about the retention of mathematical structure.
Only an option that captures both the supportive nature of the detail and the specific philosophical claim it supports will be correct.

Anahtar Kavram

Function of Detail in Context
Soru 3097Soru →

The integration of corpus linguistics into statutory interpretation is championed by textualists who argue that analyzing expansive digital databases of historical texts offers an empirical method for establishing the "ordinary meaning" of contested legal terms. This quantitative approach operates on the premise that the most statistically frequent contexts in which a word appears reliably map onto its core semantic content, thereby reducing arbitrary judicial discretion. However, semantic theorists argue that this methodology systematically conflates communicative frequency with semantic boundaries. If a 1950s linguistic corpus indicates that the term "family" most commonly co-occurred with references to a nuclear household, this merely reflects the sociocultural pragmatics of the era—what people discussed most often—rather than the word's definitive linguistic parameters. Moreover, because legislative drafting frequently employs intentional underspecification to delegate the resolution of edge cases to courts or agencies, the most statistically typical historical usage is rarely determinative of the borderline disputes that actually generate litigation. Ultimately, treating the most prototypical historical referent as the exhaustive definition arbitrarily truncates a term's broader semantic capacity.

It can be most reasonably inferred from the passage that the semantic theorists mentioned would consider which of the following to be a likely consequence of a judge relying strictly on corpus linguistics to interpret the word "family" in a 1950s statute?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The judge might mistakenly exclude a valid but atypical household arrangement from the statute's purview by equating the word's definitive parameters with its most statistically prevalent historical referent.

Cevap

The judge might mistakenly exclude a valid but atypical household arrangement from the statute's purview by equating the word's definitive parameters with its most statistically prevalent historical referent.
The passage states that semantic theorists believe corpus linguistics 'systematically conflates communicative frequency with semantic boundaries' and that treating the most typical usage as an exhaustive definition 'arbitrarily truncates a term's broader semantic capacity.' Applying this to the 1950s example, if a judge uses this method, they will look at the frequent mention of 'nuclear households' and wrongly assume this historical frequency sets the definitive boundaries of the law, thereby excluding less frequent but semantically valid family arrangements.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the semantic theorists' core critique of corpus linguistics in the passage.
The theorists argue that corpus linguistics 'conflates communicative frequency with semantic boundaries' and 'arbitrarily truncates a term's broader semantic capacity.'
Understanding the fundamental flaw identified by the critics is necessary to predict what they believe the outcome of using the flawed method would be.
2
Analyze how this critique applies to the specific example of interpreting the 1950s term 'family'.
A 1950s corpus would show 'family' mostly referring to a nuclear household due to conversational habits (pragmatics), not because the word was strictly defined that way.
The question asks specifically for the consequence of interpreting the word 'family' based on the methodology.
3
Synthesize the critique and the example to formulate the logical consequence.
If a judge strictly relies on the corpus data, they will view the most frequent historical usage (nuclear household) as the strict definition, thereby wrongly excluding other valid but less commonly discussed types of families.
This confirms that the correct answer must describe an improper narrowing of the statute's scope based on statistical frequency.

Anahtar Kavram

Inferences from the Text
Soru 3098Soru →

Recent neuroimaging studies reveal that adults who have been highly proficient in two languages since early childhood exhibit greater gray matter density in the prefrontal cortex than monolingual adults do. However, among adults who became highly proficient in a second language only after adolescence, prefrontal cortex density is indistinguishable from that of monolingual adults. Interestingly, behavioral tests indicate that tasks requiring subjects to rapidly switch attention between conflicting stimuli are performed significantly faster by both early and late bilinguals than by monolinguals.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Greater gray matter density in the prefrontal cortex is not necessary for an individual to perform rapid attention-switching tasks significantly faster than monolinguals.

Cevap

Greater gray matter density in the prefrontal cortex is not necessary for an individual to perform rapid attention-switching tasks significantly faster than monolinguals.
The correct answer synthesizes two critical pieces of information from the stimulus. We are told that late bilinguals perform attention-switching tasks faster than monolinguals. We are also told that these same late bilinguals do not have greater gray matter density than monolinguals. Therefore, it is logically proven that having greater gray matter density is not a strictly necessary prerequisite for performing these tasks faster.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the characteristics of early bilinguals based on the text.
Early bilinguals have greater prefrontal cortex density than monolinguals, and they perform attention-switching tasks faster than monolinguals.
To establish the baseline findings regarding the first group mentioned in the stimulus.
2
Analyze the characteristics of late bilinguals based on the text.
Late bilinguals have prefrontal cortex density equal to monolinguals, but they ALSO perform attention-switching tasks faster than monolinguals.
To establish the findings regarding the second group, noting the key difference from the first group.
3
Synthesize the findings to draw a valid logical inference.
Because late bilinguals achieve the enhanced performance without having the increased brain density, the increased brain density cannot be a necessary requirement for the enhanced performance.
Most Strongly Supported questions often require combining two or more distinct facts from the stimulus to deduce a new, strictly provable claim.

Anahtar Kavram

Synthesizing premises to deduce the absence of a necessary condition.
Soru 3099Soru →

Economist: A developing nation can achieve sustained economic self-reliance only if it first establishes a robust domestic manufacturing sector. Moreover, implementing protectionist trade policies is a strict prerequisite for any nation attempting to establish such a sector. Thus, if a developing nation has successfully implemented protectionist trade policies, it is guaranteed to eventually achieve sustained economic self-reliance.

Which of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the economist's reasoning?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: treats a condition whose presence is required for a particular outcome as though its presence ensures that the outcome is achieved

Cevap

The correct answer accurately describes the argument treating a necessary condition as a sufficient condition.
The correct answer perfectly captures the logical structure of the error. The premises establish that protectionist policies are a requirement (necessary condition) for the ultimate goal of self-reliance. The conclusion then flips this relationship, falsely claiming that merely having those policies is enough to guarantee (sufficient condition) the ultimate goal.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Diagram the conditional statements presented in the premises.
Premise 1: Sustained Economic Self-Reliance → Robust Domestic Manufacturing Sector. Premise 2: Robust Domestic Manufacturing Sector → Protectionist Trade Policies.
Phrases like 'only if' and 'strict prerequisite' introduce necessary conditions, which follow the arrow.
2
Combine the premises to find the valid logical chain.
Chain: Sustained Economic Self-Reliance → Protectionist Trade Policies.
Because the necessary condition of the first premise is the sufficient condition of the second, they link together logically.
3
Diagram the conclusion drawn by the economist.
Conclusion: Protectionist Trade Policies → Sustained Economic Self-Reliance.
The conclusion uses 'if' to introduce a sufficient condition and 'guaranteed to' to indicate the resulting necessary condition.
4
Compare the valid chain to the drawn conclusion to identify the logical error.
The valid chain is A → C, but the conclusion is C → A. The author has taken a necessary condition (C) and treated it as if it were a sufficient condition.
This structural mismatch is a classic Illegal Reversal flaw.
5
Locate the answer choice that abstracts this specific error.
The correct option states that the argument 'treats a condition whose presence is required... as though its presence ensures that the outcome is achieved'.
This phrasing perfectly describes taking a necessary condition ('required') and treating it as a sufficient condition ('ensures').

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Illegal Reversal within a multi-premise conditional chain by abstracting the logical flaw.
Soru 3100Soru →

Marine biologist: Over the last decade, the population of the blue-crested penguin on Solara Island has dropped by 30 percent. During this same ten-year period, the number of commercial fishing vessels operating in the island's surrounding waters has doubled. The nets used by these vessels are known to frequently entangle and drown deep-diving seabirds. Therefore, the increase in commercial fishing must be the primary cause of the decline in the blue-crested penguin population.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the marine biologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The blue-crested penguin only dives for prey during daylight hours, while the commercial fishing vessels deploy their nets exclusively at night.

Cevap

The statement that the penguins only dive during the day while the nets are deployed exclusively at night.
The correct answer destroys the causal mechanism proposed by the author. If the penguins are strictly diurnal and the nets are deployed exclusively at night, the penguins cannot possibly be getting caught in the nets. This completely undermines the conclusion that the nets are responsible for the population decline.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's conclusion.
The increase in commercial fishing is the primary cause of the decline in the blue-crested penguin population.
Understanding the exact claim being made is necessary to find evidence that undermines it.
2
Identify the premises and the proposed causal mechanism.
Premises: Penguin population dropped 30%; fishing vessels doubled; the nets used frequently entangle and drown deep-diving seabirds.
Weaken questions often hinge on the specific mechanism linking the premises to the conclusion.
3
Identify the logical gap (assumption) in the argument.
The argument assumes that the blue-crested penguins on Solara Island are actually encountering these nets and getting entangled in them.
Finding the unstated assumption reveals the vulnerability of the argument.
4
Evaluate the options to find one that attacks this assumption.
The correct option shows that temporal separation (day vs. night) makes it impossible for the penguins to encounter the nets, entirely severing the causal link.
Severing the specific causal mechanism is one of the strongest ways to weaken a causal argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening a Causal Argument by Severing the Mechanism
ÖncekiSayfa 155 / 198Sonraki
Tüm alıştırma soruları — LSAT | Examkin