Tüm alıştırma soruları

3960 soru

Soru 381Soru →

In an effort to reduce urban noise pollution, the city of Oakhaven replaced all of its traditional diesel buses with electric buses. Electric buses produce significantly less engine noise than diesel buses. However, electric buses are heavier and cause more tire-to-road friction noise at speeds above 40 km/h than diesel buses do. Most of the bus routes in Oakhaven's residential neighborhoods have speed limits of 30 km/h and are designed with frequent stops, preventing buses from exceeding these limits. Conversely, the bus routes connecting Oakhaven's commercial districts to the suburbs often require buses to travel at speeds up to 60 km/h for extended stretches.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The replacement of diesel buses with electric buses likely resulted in a greater reduction in bus-related noise in Oakhaven's residential neighborhoods than on the routes connecting commercial districts to the suburbs.

Cevap

The statement regarding the greater reduction in bus-related noise in residential neighborhoods compared to suburban routes is the most strongly supported.
The correct answer accurately synthesizes the provided facts. Because residential routes prevent buses from exceeding 30 km/h, electric buses there do not trigger the increased friction noise that occurs above 40 km/h, meaning these areas experience the full benefit of reduced engine noise. In contrast, suburban routes require speeds up to 60 km/h, where the electric buses' increased friction noise will offset some or all of the reduced engine noise. Therefore, it is highly supported that the residential areas experienced a greater net reduction in bus-related noise.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the noise profiles of the two bus types based on the text.
Electric buses have less engine noise than diesel buses, but they have more friction noise when traveling faster than 40 km/h.
Understanding the precise conditions under which each bus type is noisier is necessary to draw valid conclusions.
2
Analyze the conditions of the different routes.
Residential routes keep buses under 40 km/h (speed limit 30 km/h). Suburban routes require buses to travel up to 60 km/h.
The different routes trigger different aspects of the buses' noise profiles.
3
Synthesize the noise profiles with the route conditions.
In residential areas, electric buses are quieter (less engine noise, no excess friction noise). In suburban areas, they produce excess friction noise, mitigating the benefit of less engine noise.
This synthesis directly proves that the net reduction in noise is greater in residential areas.

Anahtar Kavram

Synthesizing conditional facts to derive a comparative conclusion
Soru 382Soru →

Urban planner: Establishing a comprehensive toll zone in the city center is a guaranteed method for achieving a substantial drop in the number of commuter vehicles. However, the city council recently voted to permanently reject the mayor's toll zone proposal. Therefore, it is certain that there will be no substantial drop in the number of commuter vehicles this year.

The urban planner's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: treats a condition that is sufficient to produce a specific outcome as though it were necessary to produce that outcome

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that the argument treats a condition that is sufficient to produce a specific outcome as though it were necessary to produce that outcome.
The planner's argument explicitly establishes that a toll zone is a sufficient condition for reducing traffic ('guaranteed method'). However, it erroneously concludes that the failure to implement the toll zone guarantees traffic will not be reduced. This assumes that the toll zone was the *only* way to reduce traffic, thereby treating a sufficient condition as if it were a necessary condition.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditional logic in the premise.
Premise: Toll Zone -> Substantial Drop in Vehicles.
The phrase 'is a guaranteed method' introduces a sufficient condition. Establishing the toll zone guarantees the drop in vehicles.
2
Analyze the conditional logic in the conclusion.
Conclusion: No Toll Zone -> No Substantial Drop in Vehicles.
The planner takes the rejection of the toll zone (the absence of the sufficient condition) to conclude that the result will absolutely not occur.
3
Identify the logical disconnect between the premise and conclusion.
The planner commits an Illegal Negation.
Just because one guaranteed method is rejected does not mean alternative methods (like better public transit or carpool incentives) couldn't also produce the same substantial drop. The argument mistakenly treats a sufficient way to achieve a goal as the only (necessary) way.
4
Evaluate the answer choices to find the one that describes an Illegal Negation.
The correct choice identifies that the argument treats a sufficient condition as a necessary condition.
This precisely matches the abstract description of the flaw committed in the stimulus.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary vs. Sufficient Condition Flaws (Illegal Negation)
Soru 383Soru →

In ancient Mediterranean societies, the widespread adoption of standardized silver coinage often occurred concurrently with an increase in long-distance maritime trade. However, historians note that the earliest standardized coins were minted almost exclusively in small denominations, which were highly impractical for large-scale maritime transactions but well-suited for daily wage labor and local retail markets. Furthermore, long-distance trade had flourished for centuries prior to the introduction of coinage, relying on weighed bullion and credit systems.

Which of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: During the initial period when standardized silver coinage was widely adopted, merchants engaged in large-scale maritime transactions likely relied on methods of exchange other than the newly minted coins.

Cevap

During the initial period when standardized silver coinage was widely adopted, merchants engaged in large-scale maritime transactions likely relied on methods of exchange other than the newly minted coins.
The stimulus states that the earliest standardized coins were 'highly impractical for large-scale maritime transactions' and that maritime trade had already flourished using 'weighed bullion and credit systems'. By combining these premises, it is strongly supported that merchants conducting large-scale maritime transactions during this initial period likely used methods other than the new, impractical small-denomination coins.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the characteristics of the earliest standardized coins.
The earliest standardized coins were minted almost exclusively in small denominations, making them highly impractical for large-scale maritime transactions.
To determine whether the newly introduced coins could realistically be used for the expanding long-distance trade.
2
Evaluate how long-distance maritime trade operated at the time.
Long-distance trade had already flourished for centuries before coinage by utilizing weighed bullion and credit systems.
To identify if alternative exchange methods existed and were accessible to maritime merchants.
3
Synthesize the findings to derive a logical inference.
Because the early standardized coins were impractical for large-scale trade, and established non-coin methods already existed, it is highly likely that maritime merchants continued using these other methods during the initial adoption of coinage.
To identify the statement most strongly supported by combining all the provided premises.

Anahtar Kavram

Most Strongly Supported Inferences
Soru 384Soru →

In the city of Oakhaven, the municipal recycling facility processes only plastics labeled type 1 and type 2. If a collected batch of recyclable materials contains any other types of plastic, the facility must either employ manual sorters to remove the unaccepted items or send the entire batch to the landfill. Due to severe municipal budget cuts this year, the facility currently has no manual sorters and has no means to acquire them. Nevertheless, recent audits indicate that more than half of the recycling batches collected from Oakhaven's residential bins contain plastics other than types 1 and 2.

Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: More than half of the recycling batches collected from Oakhaven's residential bins will be sent to the landfill.

Cevap

More than half of the recycling batches collected from Oakhaven's residential bins will be sent to the landfill.
The correct answer synthesizes the facts perfectly. The stimulus establishes that if a batch contains unacceptable plastics, it must either be manually sorted or sent to the landfill. We are explicitly told that manual sorting is impossible because the facility has no sorters and no means to acquire them. Therefore, any batch with unacceptable plastics must be sent to the landfill. Since the audits show that more than half of the residential batches contain unacceptable plastics, it logically follows that more than half of these batches must be sent to the landfill.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conditional rule regarding contaminated batches.
If a batch has plastics other than type 1 and 2, it must be manually sorted OR sent to the landfill.
This establishes the logical consequences for batches containing unaccepted materials.
2
Apply the factual constraints provided in the stimulus.
The facility has no manual sorters and no means to acquire them.
This eliminates the 'manual sorting' option, leaving 'sent to the landfill' as the only possible outcome for contaminated batches.
3
Combine the rule with the quantitative data provided by the audits.
Since more than half of the residential batches are contaminated, and all contaminated batches must go to the landfill, more than half of the batches must go to the landfill.
This yields a deduction that must be true based entirely on the provided premises.

Anahtar Kavram

Synthesizing conditional statements with quantitative premises to form a valid deduction.
Soru 385Soru →

University Dean: We are faced with a stark choice. We must either completely abolish our classical liberal arts curriculum in favor of purely vocational training, or we must accept that our graduates will be entirely unemployable in the modern economy. Because it is unacceptable for our graduates to be unemployable, we have no choice but to immediately transition to a purely vocational curriculum.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the dean's reasoning?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: It fails to consider whether a hybrid curriculum combining both classical liberal arts and vocational training could also prepare students for the modern economy.

Cevap

The argument fails to consider whether a hybrid curriculum combining both classical liberal arts and vocational training could also prepare students for the modern economy.
The argument relies on a false dichotomy by stating that the university must *either* move to 'purely vocational training' *or* accept that graduates will be 'entirely unemployable'. This artificially restricts the possibilities. The correct answer identifies this flaw by pointing out that a middle ground—such as a curriculum that combines both elements—could exist and resolve the issue.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structure of the dean's argument.
Premise 1: We must either have purely vocational training OR graduates will be unemployable. Premise 2: Graduates cannot be unemployable. Conclusion: We must have purely vocational training.
Deconstructing the argument reveals the logical relationships between the premises and the conclusion.
2
Identify any logical gaps or questionable assumptions in the premises.
The first premise presents only two extreme options and assumes no other possibilities exist.
Arguments that artificially restrict options to just two possibilities are often vulnerable to criticism.
3
Determine the name of the logical flaw present in the argument.
The argument commits a False Dilemma (or False Dichotomy) fallacy by ignoring middle-ground alternatives.
Recognizing the specific flaw allows for quick identification of the correct answer choice.
4
Evaluate the answer choices to find the one that describes a failure to consider other alternatives.
The correct answer correctly points out that the dean ignores a hybrid option.
The correct answer must describe the specific flaw committed in the stimulus.

Anahtar Kavram

False Dilemma (False Dichotomy)
Soru 386Soru →

Philosopher: For a scientific theory to be universally accepted, it must not only withstand rigorous empirical testing but also align with the prevailing metaphysical assumptions of the era. The new theory of quantum gravity has successfully withstood the most rigorous empirical testing currently available. Therefore, provided that this new theory is shown to align with the prevailing metaphysical assumptions of our era, it will inevitably gain universal acceptance within the scientific community.

Which of the following most accurately describes a logical flaw in the philosopher's reasoning?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: It infers that satisfying all the explicitly stated prerequisites for a specific status is enough to secure that status.

Cevap

The correct response points out that the argument infers that satisfying all the explicitly stated prerequisites for a specific status is enough to secure that status.
The argument establishes that withstanding empirical testing and aligning with metaphysical assumptions are prerequisites (necessary conditions) for a theory's universal acceptance. It then concludes that if a specific theory meets both of these conditions, it will definitely be accepted. This improperly treats the fulfillment of necessary requirements as sufficient to guarantee the result, representing a classic conditional reasoning error known as an illegal reversal.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditional structure in the philosopher's first sentence.
Universal Acceptance implies both Withstanding Testing AND Aligning with Metaphysics.
The phrase 'it must not only... but also' introduces two necessary conditions for the sufficient condition of being universally accepted.
2
Examine the application of this conditional rule to the new theory of quantum gravity.
The theory already meets the first condition (Withstanding Testing). The conclusion assumes that if it meets the second (Aligning with Metaphysics), it will definitively achieve Universal Acceptance.
Tracking which conditions have been met allows us to isolate the structural leap being made to reach the conclusion.
3
Identify the logical gap between the premises and the conclusion.
The argument reverses the initial conditional statement, concluding that (Withstanding Testing AND Aligning with Metaphysics) guarantees Universal Acceptance.
Fulfilling necessary conditions does not guarantee an outcome, because there might be other unstated necessary conditions required for the outcome to occur.
4
Match the logical gap to the abstract flaw descriptions provided in the options.
The correct option describes treating prerequisites (necessary conditions) as guarantees (sufficient conditions).
This captures the structural essence of an illegal reversal applied to a compound conditional statement.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary vs. Sufficient Condition Flaws
Soru 387Soru →

Linguists studying the Voro language family have observed that Voro languages that evolved in coastal environments possess a highly specialized vocabulary for distinct types of ocean currents. In contrast, Voro languages that evolved in inland, arid regions almost entirely lack such vocabulary. The modern language of Zani, which belongs to the Voro family and is spoken exclusively by a nomadic population in a landlocked desert, nonetheless contains an extensive array of archaic terms for ocean currents. Historical texts provide strong evidence that the Zani people have never traded or interacted with coastal populations.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The Zani language likely underwent at least some of its development in a coastal region.

Cevap

The statement that the Zani language likely underwent at least some of its development in a coastal region is the most strongly supported inference.
The stimulus establishes a mystery: Zani possesses a specialized coastal vocabulary despite being an inland language, and it explicitly eliminates trade as a source for this vocabulary. Since inland Voro languages generally lack such terms, the most logical explanation strictly supported by the text is that Zani acquired this vocabulary by developing, at least partially, in a coastal region before its speakers became completely landlocked.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the premises provided in the stimulus.
Coastal Voro languages have ocean current vocabulary; inland Voro languages generally lack it. Zani is a landlocked Voro language with this vocabulary. Zani people never interacted with coastal populations.
To establish the factual constraints and relationships of the argument.
2
Evaluate the anomaly presented.
Zani has coastal vocabulary despite being an inland language whose speakers have no history of coastal trade.
To identify the logical gap that the correct inference must resolve based solely on the text.
3
Synthesize the premises to find the most strongly supported conclusion.
Since Zani could not have acquired the vocabulary through trade, and inland Voro languages don't typically develop it, the language must have acquired it by developing in a coastal region before its speakers became fully landlocked.
To derive a logical inference that explains all the provided facts without relying on outside assumptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Most Strongly Supported Questions
Soru 388Soru →

In classical jurisprudence, 'desuetude' refers to the doctrine whereby a statute or legal regulation lapses and becomes unenforceable due to a long history of non-enforcement by authorities. However, relying strictly on this institutional metric fails to capture the sociomoral dynamics at play in rapidly evolving societies. We must instead recognize the phenomenon of *normative desuetude*—a condition that arises not merely when agents of the state cease to prosecute a transgression, but when the transgression itself is systematically absorbed into the baseline of acceptable public conduct by the citizenry, thereby dissolving the underlying moral warrant for the law's existence, regardless of the state's enforcement posture.

Based on the passage, the author uses the phrase "normative desuetude" to refer to which of the following?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: the erosion of a statute's ethical foundation resulting from the public's widespread assimilation of a forbidden act into standard behavior, irrespective of the government's prosecutorial actions

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that it is the erosion of a statute's ethical foundation resulting from the public's widespread assimilation of a forbidden act into standard behavior, irrespective of the government's prosecutorial actions.
The correct answer accurately synthesizes the specific elements the author uses to define the term. The passage states that the condition occurs when a transgression is 'systematically absorbed into the baseline of acceptable public conduct' (widespread assimilation into standard behavior), which results in 'dissolving the underlying moral warrant' (erosion of ethical foundation). Crucially, the passage specifies this occurs 'regardless of the state's enforcement posture' (irrespective of prosecutorial actions), separating it from classical desuetude.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate the exact phrase 'normative desuetude' in the passage.
The phrase appears in the third sentence: 'We must instead recognize the phenomenon of normative desuetude...'
Answering definition questions requires finding the specific context where the author introduces and bounds the term.
2
Analyze the syntactic structure defining the term.
The definition is provided after the em dash: 'a condition that arises not merely when [state ceases to prosecute], but when [transgression is absorbed by citizenry], thereby [dissolving moral warrant], regardless of [state's enforcement posture].'
Breaking down the sentence separates the author's primary definition from the concepts they are contrasting it with.
3
Identify the core components of the author's definition.
Component 1: The citizenry absorbs the rule-breaking into normal behavior. Component 2: This destroys the moral justification for the law. Component 3: This happens even if the state is still trying to enforce the law.
Synthesizing the core components allows for accurate evaluation of paraphrased answer choices.
4
Evaluate the options against these core components.
The correct option perfectly mirrors the three components: 'assimilation into standard behavior' = Component 1; 'erosion of ethical foundation' = Component 2; 'irrespective of prosecutorial actions' = Component 3.
The correct answer in LSAT Reading Comprehension detail questions is often a direct, abstract paraphrase of the localized text.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Stipulative Definitions
Tahmini Süre:1m 45s
Soru 389Soru →

In analyzing the ratification of the United States Constitution, contemporary legal historians often rehearse the well-documented ideological clashes between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists regarding the centralization of federal power. However, by continually re-litigating these prominent theoretical disputes, such scholarship risks marginalizing the equally contentious, yet more pragmatic negotiations over interstate commerce and taxation that fundamentally dictated the document's operational mechanics.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the meaning of the word "rehearse" as it is used in the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: comprehensively recount

Cevap

comprehensively recount
In the context of the passage, 'rehearse' describes the action legal historians take regarding 'well-documented ideological clashes.' The immediately following sentence clarifies this ongoing activity by referring to it as 'continually re-litigating these prominent theoretical disputes.' Therefore, 'rehearse' is used in its secondary sense, meaning to retell, go over, or comprehensively recount familiar arguments.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate the target word 'rehearse' in the passage and analyze its immediate grammatical context.
The word acts as a verb describing what 'contemporary legal historians' do to 'well-documented ideological clashes'.
Understanding the subject performing the action and the object receiving it is the critical first step to decoding meaning.
2
Look for subsequent sentences or phrases that elaborate on or parallel this action.
The very next sentence refers back to this exact activity as 'continually re-litigating these prominent theoretical disputes'.
Authors frequently provide contextual definitions, synonyms, or parallel phrasing in adjacent sentences to clarify academic diction.
3
Synthesize these context clues to formulate a working definition before evaluating the answer choices.
The working definition is 'to go over again', 'to review', or 'to retell' past arguments.
A strong pre-phrase prevents the test-taker from being swayed by plausible but incorrect distractors, such as the literal dictionary definition.
4
Evaluate the answer choices against the synthesized working definition.
The option 'comprehensively recount' best matches the idea of going over or retelling past disputes, fitting seamlessly into the sentence's syntax and meaning.
This confirms the correct answer and confidently eliminates options that rely on literal meanings, unsupported tones, or familiar wording.

Anahtar Kavram

Vocabulary in Context: Utilizing parallel phrasing (e.g., 're-litigating') to deduce the secondary, academic meaning of a common word.
Soru 390Soru →

Contemporary critiques of canonical sociological frameworks frequently emphasize the provincial nature of their foundational assumptions regarding human motivation. By anchoring their analytical models almost exclusively in the socioeconomic rhythms of industrializing Western European metropolises, these pioneering theorists inadvertently calcified paradigms that prove acutely inadequate when tasked with accommodating the relational fluidities indigenous to non-Western or agrarian societies.

Which of the following best captures the meaning of the word "provincial" as it is used in the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Restricted to a narrow cultural and regional vantage point

Cevap

Restricted to a narrow cultural and regional vantage point
The passage explains the 'provincial nature' of the theorists' assumptions by stating in the very next sentence that their models were anchored 'almost exclusively in the socioeconomic rhythms of industrializing Western European metropolises.' This exclusive focus on one specific region and culture means their assumptions were limited, or restricted to a narrow cultural and regional vantage point.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate the target word 'provincial' in the first sentence and analyze the surrounding context.
The word describes the 'foundational assumptions regarding human motivation' held by early sociologists.
Understanding the immediate grammatical context is necessary to determine what the word is modifying.
2
Identify the explanatory clues provided in the subsequent sentence.
The next sentence explains that these models were anchored 'almost exclusively in the socioeconomic rhythms of industrializing Western European metropolises.'
Passages typically define or elaborate on complex terms in the sentences immediately following them.
3
Synthesize the clues to determine the contextual meaning.
Because the theories were based solely on one specific geographic and cultural setting (Western European cities), their assumptions were limited in scope.
This establishes that 'provincial' here means narrow or limited to a specific region/culture, rather than its other definitions.
4
Evaluate the answer choices against this synthesized meaning.
The choice defining it as 'restricted to a narrow cultural and regional vantage point' perfectly matches the derived meaning.
This eliminates traps that rely on dictionary definitions or conflate the meaning of the word with the consequences of the theories.

Anahtar Kavram

Vocabulary in Context
Soru 391Soru →

A commercial air carrier recently terminated its contract with a software vendor that developed its automated flight-rescheduling algorithm. The airline took this action after discovering that, although the algorithm reduced total passenger delays across the network more effectively than human dispatchers, it achieved these efficiencies by disproportionately canceling flights on low-demand regional routes where passengers have no alternative transportation. The airline's executives maintained that passengers in isolated regions should not bear a disproportionate burden merely to optimize system-wide travel times. Which of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the airline executives' decision?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: A transportation service provider should not adopt a measure that increases overall operational efficiency if that measure achieves its gains by concentrating severe burdens on a subset of users who have no alternative options.

Cevap

A transportation service provider should not adopt a measure that increases overall operational efficiency if that measure achieves its gains by concentrating severe burdens on a subset of users who have no alternative options.
The argument's conclusion is that the airline was justified in rejecting the algorithm because isolated passengers should not bear a disproportionate burden merely to optimize system-wide travel times. The correct principle establishes that an organization should not adopt an efficiency-increasing measure if that measure achieves its gains by concentrating severe burdens on users who lack alternatives. When applied to the carrier's situation, this rule directly validates the executives' decision to terminate the contract.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the premises and the conclusion of the argument.
Premise: The algorithm improves overall efficiency (reduces total delays) but does so by disproportionately canceling flights for isolated regional passengers who lack alternatives. Conclusion: The executives were justified in terminating the contract and rejecting the algorithm.
Principle-Justify questions require finding an underlying rule that connects the factual scenario directly to the judgment reached.
2
Identify the logical gap between the premises and the normative conclusion.
The argument assumes that an overall gain in efficiency is unacceptable if it comes at the expense of unfairly burdening vulnerable users with no alternatives.
A valid principle must act as a bridge from 'imposes concentrated harm on alternative-less passengers' to 'should not be used / contract should be terminated'.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to find the rule that provides a sufficient bridge without logical reversal or extreme claims.
The rule prohibiting efficiency measures that achieve gains by concentrating severe burdens on users lacking alternatives directly justifies the executives' decision.
Applying this rule to the facts yields the exact judgment made by the airline executives.

Anahtar Kavram

Principle Justification (Bridging Descriptive Premise to Normative Conclusion)
Soru 392Soru →

Ecologist: Every songbird species capable of vocal mimicry possesses a specialized syringeal muscle structure. However, certain avian species indigenous to the cloud forest lack this specialized syringeal muscle structure. Therefore, some avian species indigenous to the cloud forest are not songbird species capable of vocal mimicry.

Which of the following arguments is most similar in its logical reasoning to the argument above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Every oil painting restored using traditional resin varnish develops surface micro-cracking over time. Certain sixteenth-century portraits in the municipal gallery have not developed surface micro-cracking over time. Thus, some sixteenth-century portraits in the municipal gallery are not oil paintings restored using traditional resin varnish.

Cevap

The argument concerning sixteenth-century portraits in the municipal gallery and traditional resin varnish is most similar in its logical reasoning to the original argument.
The correct argument precisely matches the logical blueprint of the stimulus. Both arguments begin with a universal conditional rule (All members of group A possess feature B), introduce a factual premise indicating that certain members of a subcategory C lack feature B, and conclude validly via modus tollens that some members of subcategory C are not members of group A.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Abstract the logical structure of the stimulus argument.
Premise 1: All X have characteristic Y (Universal conditional: X -> Y).
Premise 2: Some members of category Z do not have characteristic Y (Particular negative: Some Z are not-Y).
Conclusion: Therefore, some members of category Z are not members of group X (Valid contrapositive deduction: Some Z are not-X).
Deconstructing the argument into symbolic premises and conclusions isolates the reasoning pattern from the topic.
2
Evaluate the validity and quantifier strength of the stimulus conclusion.
The argument is logically valid and derives a particular negative claim ('some... are not') based on a contrapositive application of the universal premise to a subset.
Parallel reasoning requires matching both logical validity and modal/quantifier certainty.
3
Compare each option against the abstracted logical skeleton.
The choice discussing oil paintings restored with resin varnish establishes: (1) All paintings restored with resin varnish (X) develop micro-cracking (Y); (2) Some sixteenth-century portraits (Z) do not develop micro-cracking (not-Y); (3) Therefore, some sixteenth-century portraits (Z) are not paintings restored with resin varnish (not-X).
This is an exact structural and quantifier match to the stimulus.

Anahtar Kavram

Parallel Quantifier Syllogism and Contrapositive Inference
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 393Soru →

Agronomist: For decades, the persistently low crop yields in the Xanthus Valley were universally attributed to the high concentration of free aluminum ions in the soil, which are highly toxic to most commercial crops. To resolve this, farmers recently treated the valley's soil with a novel synthetic chelating agent that permanently neutralizes all free aluminum ions, rendering them completely biologically inert. However, subsequent harvests in the treated fields have shown no increase in crop yields. Therefore, it is evident that the high concentration of free aluminum ions was not the primary factor limiting crop yields in the valley.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the agronomist's argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The synthetic chelating agent does not itself possess properties that inhibit crop yields to a degree that would offset any potential gains from neutralizing the free aluminum ions.

Cevap

The argument must assume that the synthetic chelating agent does not itself possess properties that inhibit crop yields to a degree that would offset any potential gains from neutralizing the free aluminum ions.
The argument observes that neutralizing aluminum didn't increase yields, and concludes aluminum wasn't the primary problem. This reasoning has a massive blind spot: what if the chemical used to neutralize the aluminum damaged the crops just as much as the aluminum did? In that scenario, aluminum could absolutely have been the primary historical problem, but the farmers replaced one problem with another, resulting in zero net gain. For the agronomist's conclusion to survive, they MUST assume that the chelating agent didn't introduce a new limitation that masked the benefits. This is a classic 'Defender' assumption.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the stimulus to identify the conclusion and the premises.
Conclusion: High concentration of free aluminum ions was not the primary factor limiting crop yields. Premise: A chelating agent neutralized all aluminum, but subsequent harvests showed no increase in yields.
Understanding the structural relationship between the evidence and the conclusion is the first step in finding the logical gap.
2
Identify the logical gap in the agronomist's reasoning.
The agronomist assumes that a lack of yield increase strictly means the neutralized factor (aluminum) wasn't the main problem. This overlooks the possibility that the 'cure' might be causing its own problems.
Arguments based on experiments or interventions often fail to account for unintended side effects of the intervention itself.
3
Apply the Negation Test to the correct option.
Negating the correct option yields: 'The chelating agent DOES possess properties that inhibit yields to a degree that offsets the gains of neutralizing aluminum.' If true, yields wouldn't increase EVEN IF aluminum was the primary culprit. This completely destroys the conclusion.
The Negation Test is the definitive way to prove whether an assumption is strictly necessary for the argument to hold.

Anahtar Kavram

Defender Necessary Assumption (Ruling out alternative explanations for evidence)
Tahmini Süre:2m 15s
Soru 394Soru →

Passage A
Historically, anthropologists defined hominins largely by their unique ability to conceptualize, manufacture, and systematically use tools. This capability established a theoretical cognitive Rubicon that supposedly separated human ancestors from all other primates, reinforcing a narrative of human exceptionalism. However, decades of rigorous field research on wild chimpanzees have steadily dismantled this paradigm. Observations in natural habitats reveal that chimpanzees not only use found objects—such as employing carefully selected sticks to extract termites from mounds—but they also actively modify raw materials to suit specific functional tasks, demonstrating a clear mental representation of a desired outcome before action is taken. More significantly, the documented variations in tool-use behaviors across different, isolated chimpanzee populations strongly point to cultural transmission. For instance, a community residing in the Taï Forest may exclusively employ heavy stone hammers to crack hard-shelled nuts, whereas a group in Gombe relies entirely on wooden implements for the exact same purpose, despite the robust availability of similar natural resources in both ecological zones. These regional differences cannot be explained as genetically hardwired instincts; rather, they are complex, learned behaviors passed down through generations via prolonged social observation and imitation. Consequently, the study of chimpanzee tool use forces the scientific community to recognize that advanced cognitive abilities and the mechanisms of cultural inheritance are not strictly human traits, but are deeply rooted in our shared evolutionary history.

Passage B
For the better part of a century, cognitive science operated under the firm assumption that the avian brain, lacking the enlarged and highly folded neocortex characteristic of higher mammals, was fundamentally incapable of advanced problem-solving or abstract thought. This restrictive perspective has been radically revised in light of contemporary research on corvids, particularly focusing on the New Caledonian crow. In both controlled experimental settings and highly competitive natural environments, these birds exhibit an astonishing aptitude for targeted tool creation. They do not merely use objects; they routinely bend stiff twigs into precise hooks or fashion complex, stepped cut-outs from pandanus leaves to securely extract grubs from narrow, inaccessible crevices. What elevates this remarkable behavior from mere genetic instinct to evidence of advanced cognition is the cumulative nature of their technological refinement. Young crows spend extensive periods closely observing adult toolmakers, gradually acquiring the intricate motor skills and structural understanding required to manufacture these specific implements. Furthermore, field researchers have documented highly distinct regional variations in the design of pandanus tools across different geographic territories in New Caledonia, proving that these designs are socially transmitted. The indisputable fact that an avian species can sustain a resilient material culture, complete with regional tool dialects, profoundly challenges the longstanding mammalian bias in comparative cognitive studies. It powerfully demonstrates that the capacity for cultural transmission and sophisticated tool manufacture evolved entirely independently in birds.

Based on the provided texts, which of the following statements accurately express a central argument shared by the authors of both Passage A and Passage B? (Select all that apply)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Longstanding scientific paradigms have significantly underestimated the cognitive sophistication and problem-solving abilities of specific non-human species.; The tool-making behaviors observed in certain animal populations provide compelling evidence for cultural transmission and social learning.

Cevap

The correct statements are that longstanding scientific paradigms have underestimated the cognitive sophistication of certain non-human species, and that observed tool-making behaviors provide compelling evidence for cultural transmission.
Both authors centrally argue that complex tool manufacture and cultural transmission exist in non-human species (chimpanzees in Passage A, corvids in Passage B). Furthermore, both passages frame this evidence as a direct challenge to older, restrictive scientific frameworks (human exceptionalism in Passage A, mammalian bias in Passage B) that historically underestimated animal cognition.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Passage A to identify its primary thesis.
Passage A argues that chimpanzee tool use and regional tool variations dismantle the paradigm of human exceptionalism, demonstrating that cultural transmission and advanced cognition share an evolutionary root with humans.
Understanding the primary thesis of the first passage is necessary before comparing it to the second.
2
Analyze Passage B to identify its primary thesis.
Passage B argues that complex tool creation and regional dialects in corvids challenge the bias that advanced cognition requires a mammalian neocortex, demonstrating the independent evolution of cultural transmission in birds.
Understanding the primary thesis of the second passage allows for identifying overlapping themes.
3
Synthesize the shared overarching points from both analyses.
Both authors use examples of complex tool manufacture and regional variations to prove that specific animals possess advanced cognition and cultural transmission, thereby refuting traditional, restrictive scientific assumptions.
The question specifically asks for the central argument shared by both authors.
4
Evaluate the answer choices against the synthesized shared main point.
The statements regarding the underestimation of animal cognition by traditional science, and the evidence for cultural transmission in animals, capture the core shared thesis without misattributing specific details or overstating the scope.
Distractors in this question format often present minor shared details, statements true of only one passage, or overbroad generalizations.

Anahtar Kavram

Synthesizing the shared overarching thesis across multiple texts that possess distinct but complementary argumentative stances.
Soru 395Soru →

Passage A
Art historians have long debated the sudden and overwhelming international triumph of Abstract Expressionism in the years following World War II. While the formal innovations of artists like Jackson Pollock and Mark Rothko are undeniably significant, the movement's meteoric rise to global prominence cannot be fully understood outside the context of Cold War politics. In the late 1940s and 1950s, influential American art critics and major cultural institutions, most notably the Museum of Modern Art, began to aggressively champion the movement. They actively framed the chaotic, completely nonrepresentational canvases as the ultimate manifestation of Western individualism, spontaneity, and unbridled creative liberty. The ability of artists to paint without recognizable subject matter was heralded as the absolute antithesis of totalitarian control. This critical framing was deliberately and explicitly positioned in stark contrast to the rigid, state-mandated aesthetic of Soviet Socialist Realism, which demanded strict ideological conformity and realistic depictions of proletarian life. Consequently, the American cultural establishment embraced Abstract Expressionism not merely for its aesthetic breakthroughs, but primarily because it served as a potent, highly visible emblem of the intellectual freedoms purportedly enjoyed under democratic capitalism. The movement's unprecedented dominance in the art world was, therefore, significantly propelled by its strategic alignment with the era's dominant geopolitical imperatives.

Passage B
The conventional narrative of American modern art frequently centers on the lone, rebellious genius striving for pure aesthetic expression, isolated from political concerns. However, the global ascendance of Abstract Expressionism was heavily aided by a remarkably coordinated, albeit covert, state apparatus. Extensive historical research has recently illuminated the surprising extent to which the United States government, particularly through its intelligence agencies, secretly funded, organized, and promoted international exhibitions of abstract art throughout the early Cold War period. This cultural Cold War was viewed by policymakers as being just as critical to national security as the military standoff. Front organizations, such as the Congress for Cultural Freedom, were strategically utilized to bypass conservative domestic political opposition, which frequently derided modern art as subversive or aesthetically nonsensical. By secretly sponsoring lavish European tours featuring the works of American abstract painters, the government sought to directly counteract pervasive Soviet propaganda that routinely depicted the United States as a culturally barren, fiercely materialistic wasteland devoid of intellectual sophistication. The overarching objective of this clandestine program was to demonstrate unequivocally that a free, democratic society could foster dynamic, avant-garde, and intellectually rigorous cultural production. Thus, the international prestige and rapid dissemination of Abstract Expressionism was not a purely organic artistic phenomenon resulting solely from aesthetic evolution. Rather, it functioned as a vital, subsidized component of a deliberate ideological strategy designed to win the cultural allegiance of the European intelligentsia.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point shared by both passages?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The global prominence of Abstract Expressionism was significantly propelled by its strategic utility in promoting Western geopolitical agendas during the Cold War.

Cevap

The correct answer states that the global prominence of Abstract Expressionism was significantly propelled by its strategic utility in promoting Western geopolitical agendas during the Cold War.
The correct answer accurately synthesizes the core argument of both texts. Passage A focuses on the overt actions of cultural institutions, while Passage B focuses on covert government operations. However, both texts ultimately argue that the movement's international dominance was not purely an artistic phenomenon, but was strategically engineered because the art served as a powerful ideological symbol of Western freedom during the Cold War.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main argument of Passage A.
Passage A argues that the international triumph of Abstract Expressionism was largely due to American cultural institutions and critics framing it as a symbol of Western freedom to contrast with Soviet Socialist Realism.
Understanding the individual thesis of the first passage is required before finding the shared thesis.
2
Analyze the main argument of Passage B.
Passage B argues that the global ascendance of Abstract Expressionism was heavily aided by covert US government funding intended to counteract Soviet propaganda and win European cultural allegiance.
Understanding the individual thesis of the second passage allows for comparison.
3
Synthesize the shared overarching conclusion of both passages.
Both passages conclude that Abstract Expressionism's massive international success was not merely organic, but was fundamentally driven by its usefulness as an ideological tool during the Cold War.
A shared main point must abstract away the specific actors (museums vs. intelligence agencies) to find the broader causal relationship both authors endorse.
4
Evaluate the options against the synthesized main point.
The option identifying strategic utility in promoting Western geopolitical agendas during the Cold War perfectly encapsulates the shared synthesis.
This captures the 'why' and 'how' that both authors agree upon without leaning exclusively on the specific evidence of just one passage.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying the shared overarching thesis in comparative reading passages by abstracting from the specific evidence each author uses.
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
Soru 396Soru →

Lichenometry is a dating technique based on the predictable, radially symmetrical growth rates of crustose lichen species, such as Rhizocarpon geographicum, colonizing freshly exposed rock surfaces. Because these organisms require direct exposure to sunlight and atmospheric moisture while remaining intolerant of rapid substrate erosion, successful colonization occurs almost exclusively on stable rock faces immediately following glacial retreat or landslide events. However, because lichen growth rates vary inversely with altitude and depend heavily on microclimatic humidity, researchers cannot establish universal growth curves; instead, calibration curves must be constructed independently for each specific geographic microregion using substrates of historically documented ages.

Which of the following can be most reasonably inferred from the passage regarding the application of lichenometry?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Accurately dating rock surfaces in a particular valley requires comparing lichen measurements against baseline growth data calibrated specifically for that local environment.

Cevap

Accurately dating rock surfaces in a particular valley requires comparing lichen measurements against baseline growth data calibrated specifically for that local environment.
The correct statement is logically entailed by the passage's concluding sentence, which notes that variations in altitude and humidity prevent universal growth curves and require independent calibration curves for each specific geographic microregion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the key claims in the passage regarding the constraints and requirements of lichenometry calibration.
The passage states that growth rates vary with altitude and humidity, preventing universal curves and necessitating independent calibration curves for each microregion.
Inference questions require finding the choice that is directly supported by the combination of stated facts without extrapolating beyond the text.
2
Evaluate the answer choices against the textual evidence.
The statement that local baseline data tailored to the specific environment is necessary for accurate dating directly restates the requirement for microregion-specific calibration curves.
A valid inference must follow necessarily or with strong logical support from the passage statements.

Anahtar Kavram

Drawing necessary textual inferences from explicit qualifying conditions in scientific exposition.
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 397Soru →

An independent investigative news syndicate recently made several contentious editorial determinations regarding pending investigative reports. Match each editorial determination to the general journalistic principle that most directly justifies it:

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

The editorial board declined to publish leaked internal correspondence alleging corporate accounting fraud until independent financial audits verified the discrepancies, despite competing news organizations rushing to report the leaks.
The editorial board published confidential medical records showing a sitting prime minister suffered severe cognitive impairment while issuing executive defense orders, over objections from the leader's private physician.
The editorial board reassigned a senior energy reporter from covering a proposed renewable power subsidy bill because the reporter's spouse held substantial stock options in a prospective grant recipient.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The leaked corporate fraud decision matches the principle requiring independent corroboration for leaked allegations; the cognitive impairment disclosure matches the principle permitting privacy disclosure only when official duty execution is affected; and the reporter reassignment matches the principle mandating recusal when immediate family financial interests create a policy stake.
Each scenario presents a specific factual trigger that perfectly meets the sufficient conditions of its corresponding normative principle: independent verification for leaked materials, duty impairment for privacy disclosure, and spousal financial assets for conflict recusal.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the first scenario regarding unverified leaked correspondence
The action involves delaying publication of leaked fraud allegations until independent auditing confirms the facts. This matches the rule stipulating that unverified leaked claims must be corroborated by documentary proof before publication.
Principle application requires bridging the specific evidentiary hurdle (auditing confirmation) to the general normative constraint (corroboration requirement).
2
Analyze the second scenario regarding the disclosure of executive health records
The action overrides medical privacy specifically because executive defense actions were taken while impaired. This matches the rule that privacy may be pierced only when an undisclosed condition directly impairs the execution of official duties.
The justification relies on the functional impact of the condition on governance responsibilities.
3
Analyze the third scenario regarding reporter reassignment
The action removes a reporter whose spouse owns stock in a company affected by pending legislation. This aligns with the rule requiring removal of staff when immediate family financial assets generate a personal stake in policy coverage.
The rule addresses conflicts of interest arising from immediate familial economic ties.

Anahtar Kavram

Principle Application and Justification
Soru 398Soru →

Analyze the logical structure of the argument provided below.

'Scientific theories are often praised for their predictive power, yet the ability of a theory to yield accurate predictions does not guarantee its fundamental truth. Consider that historically, many theories that produced highly accurate predictions were later found to be based on entirely false ontological premises. Because predictive success can be achieved through models that merely happen to align with observable data by coincidence, empirical adequacy is merely a pragmatic virtue. If empirical adequacy does not entail truth, we must reject the notion that a theory's predictive success provides conclusive evidence that it accurately describes the underlying reality of the universe. Therefore, scientific realism—the belief that our best scientific theories are true descriptions of nature—is fundamentally flawed.'

Arrange the following statements in the exact logical sequence that the author uses to build the argument, starting from the foundational empirical premise and culminating in the ultimate main conclusion.

Öğeleri doğru sıraya koymak için sürükleyin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The logical sequence progresses from the historical premise, to the possibility of coincidence, to the epistemic limitation, and finally to the rejection of scientific realism.
The argument follows a strict deductive chain. It begins with the foundational empirical premise about historical theories yielding accurate predictions despite false premises. From this, it derives the first intermediate conclusion: predictive success can be a mere coincidence. This leads to the broader epistemic rule (second intermediate conclusion) that predictive success does not prove truth. Finally, this epistemic rule is used to justify the ultimate main conclusion: scientific realism is flawed.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate the foundational premise that requires no further support within the stimulus.
The author provides historical context: 'many theories that produced highly accurate predictions were later found to be based on entirely false ontological premises.'
The foundational premise is the starting empirical evidence of the reasoning chain.
2
Determine the immediate logical inference drawn from the foundational premise.
From the historical evidence, the author infers that predictive success can be achieved 'by coincidence.'
This establishes the first intermediate conclusion, linking historical facts to theoretical coincidence.
3
Identify the broader epistemic rule derived from the first intermediate conclusion.
Because success can be coincidental, the author concludes that 'empirical adequacy does not entail truth.'
This second intermediate conclusion bridges the gap between coincidental success and the final philosophical claim.
4
Identify the ultimate main conclusion of the argument.
The final sentence states 'Therefore, scientific realism... is fundamentally flawed.'
This final deduction relies on all prior premises and sub-conclusions, anchoring the end of the logical chain.

Anahtar Kavram

Tracing the logical progression from foundational premises, through intermediate sub-conclusions, to the ultimate main conclusion.
Soru 399Soru →

Please read the following passage carefully.

For centuries, the Ptolemaic model of the universe dominated astronomical thought, relying on a complex system of deferents and epicycles to explain the seemingly erratic retrogradations of planetary motion. However, this system suffered from a significant physical implausibility: the equant. The equant was a mathematical point situated opposite the Earth from the center of the deferent, from which the planet's epicycle appeared to move at a uniform angular velocity. While computationally effective for predicting planetary positions, the equant violated the Aristotelian physical principle that all celestial motion must be uniform and circular around a central point.

In the thirteenth century, astronomers at the Maragha observatory, led by the Persian polymath Nasir al-Din al-Tusi, sought to resolve this contradiction. Their goal was not to overthrow the geocentric paradigm—which remained conceptually unquestioned—but rather to synthesize Aristotelian physics with Ptolemaic mathematical astronomy. To this end, al-Tusi developed a geometric theorem now known as the 'Tusi couple.' This mathematical device consists of a smaller circle rotating inside a larger circle twice its diameter. As the smaller circle rolls inside the larger one, a point on the circumference of the smaller circle oscillates back and forth along a straight line. By replacing the problematic equant with a combination of uniformly rotating circles, the Tusi couple successfully generated linear motion from circular motion.

Al-Tusi incorporated this device into his planetary models, most notably in his lunar model, to preserve uniform circular motion while closely matching the empirical accuracy of Ptolemy's equant-based predictions. Crucially, the Maragha astronomers did not employ the Tusi couple to alter the cosmological structure of the universe. Instead, they utilized it as a strictly kinematic mechanism to purge Ptolemaic models of physical absurdities.

Centuries later, Nicolaus Copernicus utilized an identical mathematical mechanism in his 'De revolutionibus orbium coelestium'. Copernicus employed the Tusi couple to model the oscillation of the planetary spheres and the variation in orbital speeds without relying on an equant. The striking geometric similarity between the Maragha models and those of Copernicus has led many historians of science to posit a direct transmission of Islamic astronomical knowledge to Renaissance Europe. Yet, regardless of the transmission debate, the functional application of the Tusi couple in both systems underscores a shared methodological commitment: the strict adherence to the principle of uniform circular motion, a constraint that both the Maragha astronomers and Copernicus viewed as non-negotiable for any true physical representation of the heavens.

Determine whether the following statement is TRUE or FALSE based exclusively on the explicit information provided in the passage:

Statement: The Tusi couple replaced the Ptolemaic equant by utilizing a large circle that oscillates along a straight line within a smaller, uniformly rotating circle, thereby successfully generating uniform circular motion from linear motion.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The statement is definitively false because it directly contradicts two specific structural details provided in the passage. First, the text describes the Tusi couple as a 'smaller circle rotating inside a larger circle,' whereas the statement incorrectly claims it utilizes a 'large circle... within a smaller... circle.' Second, the text states that the device 'generated linear motion from circular motion,' while the statement claims the exact reverse: generating 'circular motion from linear motion.'

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate the specific description of the Tusi couple's mechanics in the passage.
The passage states: 'This mathematical device consists of a smaller circle rotating inside a larger circle twice its diameter.'
Explicit detail questions require verifying the exact wording and relationships presented in the source text.
2
Compare the spatial relationship of the circles in the statement with the passage.
The statement claims it utilizes a 'large circle... within a smaller... circle', which directly contradicts the passage's description of a 'smaller circle rotating inside a larger circle'.
Identifying inversions of relational details is crucial for evaluating the accuracy of a statement.
3
Examine the causal output of the mechanism described in the text versus the statement.
The passage states the device 'successfully generated linear motion from circular motion'. The statement claims it generated 'uniform circular motion from linear motion'.
Reversing the direction of a cause-and-effect or input-output relationship is a common distractor technique in high-difficulty reading comprehension questions.

Anahtar Kavram

Explicit Detail and Information Retrieval
Soru 400Soru →

Political Theorist: For any grassroots insurgency to achieve systemic political reform, it must maintain ideological orthodoxy while simultaneously cultivating a broad electoral consensus. Cultivating such a consensus universally necessitates that the insurgency's leadership forge alliances with incumbent political factions. Yet, the very act of forging alliances with incumbent political factions inevitably compromises the foundational tenets of the insurgency's original manifesto. It therefore follows that no grassroots insurgency can achieve systemic political reform.

The conclusion of the political theorist's argument follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: A grassroots insurgency maintains ideological orthodoxy only if it does not compromise the foundational tenets of its original manifesto.

Cevap

The option stating that an insurgency maintains ideological orthodoxy only if it does not compromise the foundational tenets of its original manifesto.
The argument relies on formal logic. Let's map it: Achieving systemic reform (A) requires both maintaining ideological orthodoxy (B) and cultivating a broad consensus (C). So, A requires B and C. The theorist then states that cultivating consensus (C) requires forging alliances (D), which in turn inevitably compromises foundational tenets (E). By chaining these premises, we deduce that if an insurgency achieves reform (A), it must maintain orthodoxy (B) AND compromise its tenets (E). However, the conclusion jumps to the absolute claim that achieving reform is impossible. To prove this conclusion, we must introduce a rule that makes it impossible to simultaneously do both B and E. The credited response provides exactly this rule: 'maintaining orthodoxy' (B) requires 'NOT compromising tenets' (NOT E). If we assume B -> NOT E, then achieving reform (A) would require an insurgency to both compromise (E) and not compromise (NOT E), which is a logical contradiction. Thus, reform (A) is impossible, perfectly justifying the conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Map the formal logic of the argument's premises and conclusion.
Conclusion: Reform -> Impossible. Premises: Reform -> (Orthodoxy AND Consensus). Consensus -> Alliances. Alliances -> Compromise.
Understanding the chain of conditional statements is required to find the deductive gap.
2
Trace the causal/conditional chain created by the premises.
Reform -> Consensus -> Alliances -> Compromise. Therefore, achieving Reform guarantees that the insurgency Compromises.
Consolidating the premises reveals what must logically follow if the sufficient condition (Reform) is met.
3
Identify the deductive gap between the premise chain and the conclusion.
The premises prove that Reform -> (Orthodoxy AND Compromise). The conclusion claims Reform is impossible. The missing link must establish that Orthodoxy and Compromise are mutually exclusive.
For the conclusion to be 100% valid, the assumption must force a logical contradiction when Reform is achieved.
4
Formulate the sufficient assumption to bridge the gap.
If an insurgency maintains Orthodoxy, it cannot Compromise (Orthodoxy -> NOT Compromise). If we add this assumption, achieving Reform requires an insurgency to both Compromise and NOT Compromise, a contradiction that proves Reform is impossible.
This specific conditional relationship guarantees the argument's absolute conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying the missing deductive link (sufficient assumption) in a formal logic chain by mapping conditional statements.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
ÖncekiSayfa 20 / 198Sonraki
Tüm alıştırma soruları — LSAT | Examkin