Tüm alıştırma soruları

3960 soru

Soru 1341Soru →

City Council Member: Last month, we installed a new, synchronized traffic light system at the Oak Street intersection. This month, the number of traffic accidents at that intersection dropped by 30% compared to the previous month. Therefore, the new traffic light system has clearly improved safety by reducing accidents at the Oak Street intersection.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the city council member's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: During the same month, major roadwork closed the primary highway feeding into the Oak Street intersection, drastically reducing the volume of traffic passing through it.

Cevap

The statement regarding major roadwork closing the primary highway and reducing traffic volume.
The argument relies on a flawed causal assumption: because the drop in accidents followed the installation of the traffic lights, the lights must have caused the drop. To weaken a causal argument, you should look for an alternate cause for the observed effect. The correct answer provides a perfect alternate cause: if major roadwork prevented cars from entering the intersection, the number of accidents would naturally decrease, completely independently of the new traffic light system.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is that the new traffic light system has improved safety by reducing accidents at the Oak Street intersection.
Understanding what the author is trying to prove is the first step in evaluating any argument.
2
Identify the premises supporting the conclusion.
The premise is that a new traffic light system was installed last month, and this month, accidents at that intersection dropped by 30%.
Premises represent the evidence used to justify the conclusion.
3
Analyze the logical gap between the premises and the conclusion.
The argument assumes a causal relationship based merely on a sequence of events. It assumes no other factors could have caused the 30% drop in accidents.
Finding the assumption or logical flaw reveals how the argument can be weakened.
4
Evaluate the options to find one that exploits this gap.
The option about major roadwork reducing traffic volume provides an alternate cause for the drop in accidents.
An alternate cause severely weakens a causal conclusion by showing the stated effect could have occurred without the stated cause.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Causal Arguments and Identifying Alternate Explanations
Soru 1342Soru →

Match each flawed argument scenario on the left with the abstract description of its specific sampling or survey flaw on the right.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

A news anchor concludes that the city overwhelmingly opposes a new tax based on emails sent by viewers during a broadcast.
An author asserts that a specific business strategy ensures long-term wealth by analyzing the habits of fifty currently successful billionaires.
A researcher determines that a national candidate is unpopular with youth after surveying students at a single, politically homogeneous private college.
A consumer claims a new vehicle model has defective brakes because three recent buyers reported brake failures within a week of purchase.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The viewer emails scenario maps to individuals who actively opted to express opinions. The billionaire scenario maps to entities that have already survived a selection process. The private college scenario maps to a remarkably narrow and unrepresentative demographic subset. The brake failure scenario maps to an inadequately small number of isolated anecdotes.
Each flawed argument neatly maps to a distinct sampling error. The email survey fails due to self-selection (voluntary response bias). The billionaire study is flawed because it ignores those who failed (survivorship bias). The college poll surveys an insular group to make a broad claim (unrepresentative demographic subset). The brake failure claim relies on too few data points (small sample size).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the news anchor scenario.
Identified that the sample relies entirely on people who actively chose to send emails.
This matches the abstract description of voluntary opt-in response bias.
2
Analyze the billionaire scenario.
Identified that the sample only includes people who are already financially successful.
This matches the abstract description of survivorship bias, which ignores failures.
3
Analyze the college student scenario.
Identified that the sample represents a very specific, homogeneous group rather than the diverse national youth population.
This matches the abstract description of surveying a narrow, unrepresentative demographic subset.
4
Analyze the vehicle buyer scenario.
Identified that the sweeping conclusion is based on merely three incidents.
This matches the abstract description of generalizing from an inadequately small number of anecdotes.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying the specific mechanism by which a sample fails to accurately represent the target population in inductive reasoning.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 1343Soru →

An urban planner argues: 'Last year, our city installed a new smart traffic light network at ten major intersections. Over the past twelve months, traffic accidents at these specific intersections decreased by 30%. Therefore, the new smart traffic lights directly caused this significant reduction in accidents.'

Match each potential alternate explanation (objection) on the left with the specific defender assumption on the right that the urban planner must rely on to neutralize that threat to the causal claim.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

A new highway bypass recently opened, diverting a substantial amount of vehicle traffic away from the targeted intersections.
The city simultaneously doubled police patrols at the targeted intersections to monitor the implementation of the new system.
The targeted intersections were chosen solely because they experienced an anomalous, statistically rare spike in accidents the prior year.
The year prior to the installation featured record-breaking ice storms, while the past twelve months had unusually clear weather.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Match the highway bypass to the assumption about car volume; the police patrols to the assumption about law enforcement; the anomalous spike to the assumption about historical baselines; and the weather changes to the assumption about mild climate.
In causal reasoning, a defender assumption protects the argument by explicitly ruling out an alternative explanation for the evidence. By matching each specific threat (alternate cause) with the assumption that negates it, we logically insulate the author's claim that the smart lights were the true cause.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the causal argument in the stem.
The argument concludes that A (smart lights) caused B (reduced accidents) based on the premise that B followed A.
Identifying the cause and effect is required to understand what alternate explanations threaten the conclusion.
2
Understand the function of a defender assumption.
A defender assumption eliminates a specific alternate cause or confounding variable that could explain the observed effect.
This establishes the rule for matching: the correct assumption must directly negate the specific alternate explanation proposed in the left column.
3
Evaluate each alternate explanation and pair it with its logical negation.
Highway bypass (volume drop) pairs with the assumption of no volume drop. Police pairs with no law enforcement effect. Statistical anomaly pairs with no reversion to baseline. Weather pairs with no climate effect.
This guarantees that if the assumption is true, the specific threat to the author's causal claim is successfully eliminated.

Anahtar Kavram

Defender Assumptions (Ruling out alternative causes)
Soru 1344Soru →

A multi-decade study of the Silver-tufted Macaque, a primate species inhabiting both dense rainforests and newly established agricultural plantations, revealed a striking trend: macaques living in the plantation zones exhibit significantly lower levels of the stress hormone cortisol than their rainforest counterparts. The researchers noted that plantation environments lack the large arboreal predators common in the rainforest. Therefore, the reduced presence of these natural predators in the plantations has caused the lower cortisol levels observed in the plantation macaques.

Which one of the following is an assumption upon which the argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Macaques that are naturally predisposed to lower cortisol levels are not disproportionately more likely than other macaques to migrate from the rainforest into agricultural plantations.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that macaques predisposed to lower cortisol levels are not disproportionately more likely to migrate to the plantations.
The argument observes a correlation (living in plantations and lower cortisol) and concludes an absolute causal relationship (lack of predators causes lower cortisol). To make this causal leap, the argument implicitly assumes that the cause and effect are not reversed. If macaques with naturally low cortisol were simply the ones choosing to move to the plantations (perhaps because bolder animals explore new habitats), the causal claim would be invalid. Therefore, ruling out this specific selection bias is a necessary assumption for the argument to function.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument.
Premise: Plantation macaques have lower cortisol and fewer predators than rainforest macaques. Conclusion: Fewer predators caused the lower cortisol.
Deconstructing the argument is necessary to spot the logical gap between the evidence and the claim.
2
Analyze the reasoning flaw or gap.
The argument moves from a correlation (fewer predators and lower cortisol) to an absolute causal relationship, failing to account for alternate causes or reverse causation.
Identifying the gap reveals what an unstated necessary assumption must defend against.
3
Evaluate the options using the Negation Test for necessary assumptions.
Negating the correct option reveals that if macaques with naturally low cortisol self-selected into the plantations, the causal conclusion is destroyed.
The Negation Test definitively separates necessary assumptions from sufficient assumptions and irrelevant statements.

Anahtar Kavram

Ruling Out Reverse Causation in Causal Arguments
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 1345Soru →

A computer scientist argues: 'Our new AI model utilizes unsupervised learning on completely unstructured data. Therefore, the model will inevitably produce novel artistic expressions.' To strictly guarantee this conclusion from the premise, a continuous chain of conditional assumptions must be established. Arrange the following assumptions in the correct logical sequence to form a valid sufficient bridge connecting the explicit premise to the main conclusion.

Öğeleri doğru sıraya koymak için sürükleyin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct logical sequence starts with the premise about unsupervised learning and chains through unpredictable patterns, bypassing heuristics, and creative autonomy, finally reaching the conclusion of novel artistic expressions.
The correctly ordered sequence demonstrates the transitive property of sufficient conditionals. It begins precisely with the argument's stated premise and links it through intermediate necessary conditions that become the sufficient conditions for the subsequent steps, ending perfectly with the argument's stated conclusion. This creates an unbroken logical chain, making the conclusion a necessary deductive outcome of the initial premise.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's core explicit premise and main conclusion.
Premise: utilizes unsupervised learning on unstructured data. Conclusion: produces novel artistic expressions.
To build a sufficient bridge, you must pinpoint the exact starting point and ending point of the logical gap.
2
Find the assumption that takes the explicit premise as its sufficient condition.
The statement linking 'unsupervised learning' to 'unpredictable pattern associations' is the first logical step.
This initiates the transitive chain by guaranteeing an intermediate consequence based directly on the stated premise.
3
Connect the necessary condition of the first link to the sufficient condition of the next link.
The statement linking 'unpredictable pattern associations' to 'bypassing pre-programmed design heuristics' is the second step.
This continues the deductive chain by ensuring the outcome of the first step triggers the condition for the second step.
4
Complete the chain by connecting the remaining intermediate condition to the main conclusion.
Link 'bypassing heuristics' to 'creative autonomy', and then 'creative autonomy' to 'novel artistic expressions'.
This strictly entails the conclusion from the premise through transitive logic, establishing an absolute logical guarantee.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Sufficient Assumptions
Soru 1346Soru →

Factory Safety Director: Last year, 85 percent of the reported injuries at our manufacturing plant happened during the morning shift, whereas only 15 percent occurred during the evening shift. It is clear from this data that our morning shift operations are inherently more hazardous than our evening shift operations.

Which of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the Factory Safety Director's reasoning?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: fails to consider the comparative number of employees working during each of the two shifts

Cevap

The option stating that the argument fails to consider the comparative number of employees working during each of the two shifts.
The correct answer identifies that the Director uses percentages of the total number of injuries to compare the relative danger (hazard level) of two shifts. However, a higher proportion of total injuries does not necessarily mean the shift is more dangerous for an individual worker. If the morning shift employs 1,000 workers and the evening shift employs only 10 workers, the morning shift would naturally have a much larger percentage of the total injuries even if the evening shift is vastly more dangerous per worker. The argument fundamentally confuses proportions of a total with relative rates by failing to account for the population size of each shift.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premise and conclusion of the argument.
Premise: 85% of total injuries were on the morning shift, 15% on the evening shift. Conclusion: The morning shift is more hazardous.
Breaking down the argument structure is the first step to evaluating its logical validity.
2
Analyze the relationship between the evidence and the conclusion to locate the logical gap.
The argument leaps from a statistic about the share of total injuries (a percentage of the whole) to a conclusion about relative danger (which requires knowing the rate of injury per worker).
Identifying missing information reveals the flaw in the reasoning.
3
Match the gap to standard logical fallacies.
This is a classic 'Percentages vs. Numbers' flaw. If the morning shift has significantly more workers than the evening shift, it would naturally account for a larger percentage of total injuries, even if the actual risk (hazard) to any individual worker is identical or lower.
Recognizing the exact fallacy type allows for accurate prephrasing of the correct answer choice.

Anahtar Kavram

Flaw in the Reasoning: Percentages vs. Numbers
Soru 1347Soru →

Linguist: Tarania's indigenous language features a complex tonal system, structurally identical to mainland languages 2,000 miles away, but unlike the non-tonal languages of neighboring islands. Anthropologists argue this tonal system evolved independently due to similar acoustic environments between Tarania and the mainland. However, geological records prove Tarania's environment has always resembled its non-tonal neighbors, not the mainland. Therefore, Tarania's tonal system must have been introduced by ancient mainland settlers who migrated to the island.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the linguist's conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Fundamental linguistic structures, such as a highly complex tonal system, are universally adopted only through long-term demographic integration and not through temporary contact.

Cevap

Fundamental linguistic structures, such as a highly complex tonal system, are universally adopted only through long-term demographic integration and not through temporary contact.
The correct answer strengthens the argument by explicitly ruling out a highly plausible alternative explanation: temporary contact through trade networks. By establishing that such complex linguistic features strictly require long-term demographic integration, it bridges the gap between the observed phenomenon and the author's specific conclusion that settlers permanently migrated.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's core structure (premises and main conclusion).
Premises: The tonal system matches the mainland but not neighbors; it didn't evolve independently via environment because Tarania's environment doesn't match the mainland's. Conclusion: Mainland settlers migrating to Tarania introduced the tonal system.
Understanding the core argument structure is required to isolate the logical gap.
2
Identify the logical gap in the reasoning.
The linguist assumes that ruling out independent environmental evolution leaves permanent migration as the only explanation, ignoring other forms of contact like historical trade.
Strengthening an argument often involves closing unstated gaps or ruling out alternative explanations.
3
Evaluate the options to find one that bridges the gap or rules out an alternative cause.
The option stating that complex tonal systems require long-term demographic integration rather than temporary contact perfectly eliminates the most plausible alternative mechanism (trade).
Ruling out alternative causes directly bolsters the author's proposed causal mechanism.

Anahtar Kavram

Ruling out alternative explanations to strengthen a causal claim.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 1348Soru →

Neurobiologist: The presence of synchronous gamma-band oscillations in any neural architecture—whether organic or synthetic—is sufficient to demonstrate the integration of sensory modalities across distinct cortical zones. Such cortical integration invariably engenders a subjective conscious state, provided the system is not subjected to pharmacological suppression, such as general anesthesia. The synthetic biological processor recently engineered at the institute clearly displays synchronous gamma-band activity. Furthermore, due to its non-organic substrate, this processor is entirely impervious to pharmacological suppression. We can therefore conclude with certainty that the processor possesses genuine self-reflective awareness.

Which one of the following, if assumed, enables the conclusion to be properly drawn?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Any entity that experiences a subjective conscious state possesses genuine self-reflective awareness.

Cevap

The correct answer is the statement that any entity that experiences a subjective conscious state possesses genuine self-reflective awareness.
The argument establishes a chain of formal logic. We know the processor has gamma-band activity, which guarantees cortical integration. We also know it is immune to pharmacological suppression. Together, these two factors guarantee that the processor experiences a 'subjective conscious state' (the intermediate conclusion). However, the author's final conclusion makes a new claim about 'genuine self-reflective awareness'. To make the argument logically valid, we must guarantee that having a subjective conscious state leads to genuine self-reflective awareness. The correct option provides this exact bridge: Subjective Conscious State -> Genuine Self-Reflective Awareness.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditional premises provided by the neurobiologist.
Premise 1: Gamma-band activity -> Cortical integration. Premise 2: (Cortical integration AND NO pharmacological suppression) -> Subjective conscious state.
Mapping formal logic is necessary to understand what the argument has successfully proven.
2
Apply the premises to the specific subject: the synthetic biological processor.
The processor has gamma-band activity, meaning it has cortical integration. It is also impervious to pharmacological suppression. Therefore, we can logically deduce that it experiences a subjective conscious state.
This establishes the intermediate conclusion that the author uses to leap to the final claim.
3
Identify the gap between the proven intermediate conclusion and the author's final conclusion.
The author has proven the processor has a 'subjective conscious state', but concludes it has 'genuine self-reflective awareness'.
In a sufficient assumption question, you must find the exact logical gap where the argument makes an unwarranted leap.
4
Formulate the assumption required to guarantee the final conclusion.
The missing link is: Subjective conscious state -> Genuine self-reflective awareness.
Adding this conditional statement to our established facts will legally force the final conclusion to be true.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Sufficient Assumptions in Formal Logic Chains
Soru 1349Soru →

Sociologists observe that only those institutions characterized by transparent governance are capable of fostering long-term community trust. However, any institution heavily reliant on algorithmic decision-making inevitably obscures its internal mechanisms, thereby precluding transparent governance. Because modern decentralized financial networks represent the vanguard of institutional innovation, it is evident that these networks will ultimately fail to foster long-term community trust.

Which one of the following, if assumed, enables the conclusion to be properly drawn?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No institution representing the vanguard of institutional innovation avoids heavy reliance on algorithmic decision-making.

Cevap

The statement linking the vanguard of institutional innovation to heavy reliance on algorithmic decision-making.
The argument attempts to prove that modern decentralized financial networks will ultimately fail to foster trust. The premises establish a chain: Fostering trust requires transparency, but algorithmic reliance precludes transparency. Therefore, algorithmic reliance guarantees a failure to foster trust. The author introduces decentralized networks by stating they represent 'the vanguard of institutional innovation,' and jumps to the conclusion that they will fail to foster trust. To make this jump, the author must assume that being the vanguard of institutional innovation guarantees heavy reliance on algorithms. The correct choice provides this exact formal link via the phrasing 'No institution representing the vanguard... avoids heavy reliance,' which translates logically to: Vanguard -> Algorithmic Reliance.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Map the conditional logic of the premises.
Foster Trust -> Transparent Governance, and Algorithmic Reliance -> ~Transparent Governance.
This establishes the core deductive chain of the argument.
2
Combine the premises to form a deduction.
Algorithmic Reliance -> ~Foster Trust.
By linking the two conditional statements, we see that relying on algorithms guarantees a failure to foster trust.
3
Identify the remaining premise and the conclusion to find the logical gap.
Premise: Decentralized Networks -> Vanguard of Innovation. Conclusion: Decentralized Networks -> ~Foster Trust. Gap: Vanguard of Innovation -> Algorithmic Reliance.
The conclusion introduces 'modern decentralized financial networks' through their descriptive trait ('vanguard of institutional innovation'). To reach the conclusion, this trait must trigger the established deduction.
4
Select the option that provides the missing conditional link.
The correct choice states that no institution in the vanguard avoids algorithmic reliance, which translates to: Vanguard -> Algorithmic Reliance.
When added to the premises, this strictly guarantees the conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging conditional logic gaps using intermediate descriptive terms.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 1350Soru →

Last year, the city of Oakhaven implemented a strict water conservation program. In response, residents successfully reduced their average daily water usage by 20 percent per person. Surprisingly, despite this widespread compliance among residents, Oakhaven's total municipal water consumption was actually higher last year than it was the year before the program began.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy in the information above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Several large manufacturing plants, which account for the majority of the city's overall water use, opened in Oakhaven last year.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that several large manufacturing plants, which account for the majority of the city's overall water use, opened in Oakhaven last year.
The correct answer resolves the paradox by introducing a massive, non-residential source of water consumption. If industrial plants use the majority of the city's water and they just opened last year, this new industrial usage would easily outweigh the 20 percent reduction in residential usage. This perfectly explains how total municipal consumption increased while individual residential consumption decreased, allowing both premises to logically coexist.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the two seemingly conflicting premises in the stimulus.
Premise 1: Residents reduced their per-person water usage by 20 percent. Premise 2: Total municipal water consumption increased.
Understanding the exact nature of the paradox is required before attempting to bridge the gap.
2
Determine what is missing or assumed between the conflicting facts.
The stimulus assumes that residential usage dictates total municipal usage, ignoring other potential categories of water consumers (like industrial, commercial, or agricultural users).
Identifying the 'missing link' allows you to anticipate the type of information needed to resolve the discrepancy.
3
Evaluate the options to find one that allows both premises to be true simultaneously.
The option regarding new manufacturing plants explains that a new, massive source of non-residential water consumption was introduced, which mathematically overrides the residential savings.
A correct resolution must explain the overall increase without contradicting the fact that individual residents successfully conserved water.

Anahtar Kavram

To resolve a paradox involving a rate or subset (per-person residential usage) versus a total count (overall municipal usage), look for a change in another subset or a change in the overall baseline.
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1351Soru →

City official: To reduce traffic congestion downtown, we should build a new subway line connecting the suburbs to the city center. A recent survey showed that 70 percent of suburban commuters would take the subway if it were available.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the city official's argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: At least some of the suburban commuters who would take the subway currently commute to downtown in vehicles that contribute to traffic congestion.

Cevap

At least some of the suburban commuters who would take the subway currently commute to downtown in vehicles that contribute to traffic congestion.
The argument concludes that a new subway will reduce traffic congestion because 70 percent of suburban commuters will ride it. This reasoning contains a logical gap: it assumes that these future subway riders are currently using transportation methods that cause traffic. By applying the Negation Test, if we assume the opposite—that none of these commuters currently use vehicles that contribute to congestion (for example, they already carpool with others who will continue driving, or they take an existing train)—then moving them to a new subway would remove zero vehicles from the road, and congestion would not decrease. Because negating this statement destroys the argument's conclusion, it is a strictly necessary assumption.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is that building the subway will reduce traffic congestion downtown.
This establishes the logical target that the premises must support.
2
Identify the supporting premise.
The premise is that 70 percent of suburban commuters would take the subway if available.
Understanding the premise helps locate the logical gap between the evidence and the conclusion.
3
Find the logical gap between the premise and the conclusion.
The argument assumes that people switching to the subway will actually take cars or buses off the road. If they were already walking, biking, or taking a different train, congestion would not change.
Necessary assumptions bridge unstated gaps in the argument's logic.
4
Apply the Negation Test to verify the correct assumption.
Negating the correct statement means none of the new subway riders currently use vehicles that cause congestion. If true, the subway would remove zero vehicles from the road, destroying the conclusion.
A necessary assumption must be true for the argument to survive; its logical negation must completely undermine the argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Necessary Assumptions using the Negation Test
Soru 1352Soru →

Below are four distinct arguments that conclude a causal relationship based on observed evidence. For each argument, identify the specific logical gap it leaves open by matching it to the core assumption necessary to bridge that gap.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Data collected from smartphone users reveals a strong positive correlation between the daily use of dietary tracking apps and clinical anxiety. Psychologists hypothesize that the constant pressure to log meals directly generates psychological distress.
A manufacturing plant saw its total weekly output surge by 20 percent in the months following a major upgrade to its ventilation system. Management credits the superior air quality for this dramatic boost in worker productivity.
Since a corporation instituted a zero-tolerance penalty for workplace incivility, the total volume of complaints filed with human resources has fallen by half. Executives assert that the new rule has effectively fostered a more polite workforce.
Urban areas boasting a high concentration of artisanal coffee shops also exhibit a much higher rate of software patents registered per capita. Urban planners deduce that the culture of frequenting these shops stimulates technological innovation.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Smartphone data pairs with Reversed causality; Manufacturing plant pairs with Alternative simultaneous intervention; Corporation policy pairs with Reluctance to come forward; Urban areas pairs with Overarching demographic variable.
Each argument represents a distinct manifestation of causal reasoning on the LSAT, requiring a specific assumption type to be valid. The smartphone argument assumes causality isn't reversed. The plant argument assumes no alternate, simultaneous event occurred. The corporate policy argument assumes the reporting metric reliably reflects reality. The urban area argument assumes a common third cause isn't responsible for both trends.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the 'Smartphone data' argument.
The argument observes a correlation between tracking apps and anxiety, concluding apps cause anxiety. It requires the assumption that anxiety does not cause people to use tracking apps.
This is a classic reverse causation vulnerability.
2
Analyze the 'Manufacturing plant' argument.
The argument observes a sequential change (ventilation upgrade followed by productivity boost) and concludes causation. It requires the assumption that no other simultaneous change caused the boost.
Arguments based on sequential events are highly vulnerable to alternate, simultaneous causes.
3
Analyze the 'Corporation policy' argument.
The argument equates a drop in reported complaints with a drop in actual incivility. It assumes the reporting metric is a reliable indicator of reality.
Policies with severe penalties often suppress the reporting of an issue rather than eliminating the underlying behavior.
4
Analyze the 'Urban areas' argument.
The argument correlates coffee shops with patents, assuming one causes the other. It assumes a third variable (like a booming tech sector) isn't causing both.
Correlations between two distinct cultural or economic markers often stem from a shared third cause.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying the specific type of unstated assumption required to validate a causal argument, such as ruling out reverse causation, alternate causes, data unreliability, or common third variables.
Soru 1353Soru →

University Administrator: To assess whether the 'Skills-First' curriculum implemented three years ago has adequately prepared our students for the workforce, we evaluated feedback from recent alumni. Questionnaires were sent to all graduates from the past three years who currently maintain active memberships in the university's philanthropy network. Over 80 percent of the respondents indicated that they are excelling in their careers and credited the curriculum for their achievements. This clearly demonstrates that the new curriculum successfully prepares our students for professional success.

The reasoning in the university administrator's argument is flawed in that the argument

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: projects survey results from a specific subgroup of alumni onto the broader graduate population, even though membership in that subgroup is strongly associated with the outcome being measured

Cevap

The argument projects survey results from a specific subgroup of alumni onto the broader graduate population, even though membership in that subgroup is strongly associated with the outcome being measured.
The argument attempts to establish the overall effectiveness of a curriculum based on a survey. However, the survey was exclusively sent to members of the university's philanthropy network. Alumni who donate money to their university are disproportionately likely to be financially secure and successful in their careers. Therefore, this sample is unrepresentative of the entire graduating class, and their highly positive feedback cannot be reliably projected onto all recent alumni. The correct answer accurately identifies this severe sampling bias.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
The new 'Skills-First' curriculum successfully prepares students for professional success.
Understanding the exact scope of the conclusion is necessary to determine if the evidence provided is sufficient to support it.
2
Identify the premises supporting this conclusion.
A survey of graduates from the past three years who are active in the university's philanthropy network showed that over 80 percent are excelling in their careers and credit the curriculum.
We must isolate the evidence the author uses to justify their generalized claim.
3
Evaluate the relationship between the premises and the conclusion to find the logical gap.
The conclusion makes a broad claim about all students, but the premise relies on a very specific, self-selected sample: members of a philanthropy network. Alumni who donate money are inherently more likely to be financially secure and successful.
This reveals a classic unrepresentative sample flaw: the surveyed group is biased toward the very characteristic (success) being measured.
4
Select the option that accurately describes this sampling flaw in abstract terms.
The correct option notes that the argument projects findings from a subgroup onto a broader population, despite membership in that subgroup being tied to the measured outcome.
This perfectly matches the identified flaw without falling for irrelevant traps regarding causation or absolute numbers.

Anahtar Kavram

Unrepresentative Sample Bias (Sampling Flaw)
Soru 1354Soru →

Historian: In the seventeenth-century town of Oakhaven, merchant records show a sudden surge in the importation of foreign spices immediately following a prolonged period of severe drought. Some scholars argue this indicates that the town's elite significantly increased their wealth during the drought. However, it is more likely that the drought destroyed local herb crops, forcing residents to rely heavily on imported spices for basic food preservation. Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the historian's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The foreign spices imported during the period following the drought consisted almost entirely of basic preservatives rather than the rare culinary spices traditionally favored by the wealthy.

Cevap

The option stating that the foreign spices imported consisted almost entirely of basic preservatives rather than rare culinary spices.
The correct answer decisively strengthens the historian's argument by providing specific data about the types of spices imported. By confirming that the spices were basic preservatives rather than rare culinary luxuries, it perfectly validates the historian's claim that the imports were for basic food preservation due to crop failure, while simultaneously undermining the scholars' alternative claim that the imports were a display of new elite wealth.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the historian's main conclusion.
The surge in spice imports occurred because the drought destroyed local herbs, forcing residents to use imported spices for basic food preservation.
Understanding the precise claim is necessary to evaluate which piece of evidence best supports it.
2
Identify the opposing alternative explanation presented in the stimulus.
Some scholars argue the surge in imports was caused by the town's elite increasing their wealth and buying luxury goods.
In causal arguments, strengthening often involves ruling out or undermining alternative causes.
3
Evaluate the options to find evidence that supports the historian's specific mechanism over the scholars' alternative.
The correct option shows that the nature of the imported goods (basic preservatives) aligns perfectly with the historian's theory and directly contradicts the scholars' theory (which relies on the assumption of luxury consumption).
Evidence that validates the hypothesized cause-and-effect relationship while ruling out a known alternative provides the most robust support.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening causal arguments by confirming the mechanism and ruling out alternative explanations.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 1355Soru →

A municipality recently implemented a comprehensive ban on single-use plastic grocery bags with the stated goal of reducing the total volume of plastic waste generated by its residents. However, municipal data revealed that the city's total plastic waste actually increased significantly in the year following the implementation of the ban. The discovery that residents began purchasing thick, heavy-duty plastic trash liners—which use far more plastic per unit—to replace the free grocery bags they had previously reused for their household garbage effectively resolves this apparent discrepancy.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

The statement is true.
The correct answer is True because a valid resolution to a paradox must introduce new information that allows both seemingly contradictory facts to coexist. In this case, the shift from reusing thin grocery bags to purchasing thick, heavy-duty trash bags perfectly explains how a ban on one plastic item logically led to an overall increase in total plastic waste.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the apparent discrepancy in the scenario.
A ban on single-use plastic bags was followed by an unexpected increase in the city's total plastic waste.
Understanding the exact nature of the conflict is necessary to evaluate if the new information can resolve it.
2
Evaluate the new information provided as a potential resolution.
Residents started buying heavy-duty trash bags that contain far more plastic than the banned bags to use as garbage liners.
This determines the mechanism by which the new premise might bridge the gap.
3
Determine if the new information allows both original premises to logically coexist.
Yes. The ban eliminated thin bags but directly caused the purchase of thicker bags, resulting in a net increase in plastic waste.
A valid resolution to a paradox must fully explain how both conflicting facts can occur together in reality.

Anahtar Kavram

Resolving a Paradox by Finding a Bridging Mechanism
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 1356Soru →

Argument: A recent study observed that individuals who consume green tea daily are significantly less likely to contract the common cold compared to those who do not drink green tea. The researchers concluded that specific antioxidants in green tea actively strengthen the immune system against cold viruses.

Statement: The new evidence that individuals who drink green tea daily are also much more likely to practice rigorous hand hygiene and avoid crowded places during cold season weakens the researchers' conclusion.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement accurately reflects how to weaken a correlation-to-causation argument. By pointing out that the group experiencing fewer colds also engages in behaviors known to prevent illness (hand hygiene, avoiding crowds), the new evidence provides a strong alternate explanation for the outcome. This significantly weakens the researchers' conclusion that green tea was the determining factor.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the original argument to identify the premise and conclusion.
The premise is a correlation between drinking green tea and having fewer colds. The conclusion is that green tea directly causes this reduction in colds.
Understanding the logical structure of the argument is essential for evaluating how new evidence affects it.
2
Examine the new evidence provided in the statement.
The evidence shows that green tea drinkers also share another trait: they practice better hygiene and avoid crowds.
We must understand the content of the new information to assess its logical impact.
3
Evaluate the impact of the new evidence on the argument's conclusion.
The new evidence provides an alternative cause (hygiene) for the effect (fewer colds), which makes the researchers' conclusion about green tea less likely to be the true cause.
Providing an alternate explanation for an observed correlation is a standard and effective method to weaken a causal conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening a causal argument by providing an alternative explanation for an observed correlation.
Soru 1357Soru →

Linguist: To completely understand a newly discovered language, researchers must be able to accurately translate its idiomatic expressions. However, the idioms of any language are deeply rooted in the unique historical experiences of the culture that speaks it. Since the historical experiences of the recently contacted Zephyrian culture are entirely undocumented and inaccessible to outsiders, researchers will never be able to completely understand the Zephyrian language.

Evaluate whether the following statement is true or false:
The linguist's argument logically depends on the assumption that researchers cannot accurately translate a language's idiomatic expressions without having access to the unique historical experiences of the culture that speaks it.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The correct answer is True. The argument relies on linking the inaccessible history of the Zephyrian culture to the inability to translate its idioms. The unstated bridge is that one actually needs access to that history in order to translate the idioms. Without this, the argument fails.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is: researchers will never be able to completely understand the Zephyrian language.
Locating the conclusion is the first step in evaluating any logical argument.
2
Identify the premises supporting the conclusion.
Premise 1: Complete understanding requires translating idiomatic expressions. Premise 2: Idioms are deeply rooted in a culture's unique historical experiences. Premise 3: Zephyrian historical experiences are completely undocumented and inaccessible.
Understanding the evidence provided allows us to spot the logical gap.
3
Identify the logical gap between the premises and the conclusion.
The argument jumps from the fact that idioms are 'rooted in' history to the conclusion that one 'cannot translate' them without access to that history.
A necessary assumption must bridge this gap to make the argument logically valid.
4
Apply the Negation Technique to the proposed assumption.
Negated assumption: Researchers CAN accurately translate idiomatic expressions without having access to the historical experiences. If this is true, the lack of Zephyrian historical records does not prevent translation, and the conclusion that they will never understand the language falls apart.
The Negation Technique definitively proves whether an assumption is logically necessary for the argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary Assumption (Bridging the Gap and Negation Technique)
Soru 1358Soru →

Read the argument below.

Macroeconomist: A transition to a purely fiat currency system invariably destabilizes a nation's financial foundation. Such a monetary shift is inevitably ruinous because severing a currency's tie to tangible assets and relying entirely on government decree fundamentally undermines the long-term economic stability of the state. Hence, adopting a currency without intrinsic value guarantees financial destabilization.

Is it true or false that the macroeconomist's argument commits the logical flaw of circular reasoning by relying on a premise that merely assumes what it sets out to establish?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The correct answer is True because the macroeconomist's argument exhibits textbook circular reasoning through synonymic paraphrasing. The conclusion claims that fiat currency destabilizes financial foundations. The premise states that severing ties to tangible assets (which defines fiat currency) undermines economic stability (which is synonymous with financial destabilization). No independent evidence is offered; the premise simply assumes the conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion of the macroeconomist's argument.
The conclusion is that a fiat currency system destabilizes a nation's financial foundation.
Isolating the conclusion establishes the central claim that the argument is attempting to prove.
2
Identify the premise provided to support the conclusion.
The premise is that severing a currency's tie to tangible assets and relying on government decree undermines long-term economic stability.
Identifying the premise is necessary to evaluate the logical relationship between the evidence and the conclusion.
3
Compare the conceptual meaning of the premise to the conclusion.
The phrase 'severing a currency's tie to tangible assets' is the definition of a 'fiat currency system'. Similarly, 'undermines long-term economic stability' is synonymous with 'destabilizes a financial foundation'.
This comparison reveals whether the premise offers independent evidence or merely paraphrases the conclusion using different vocabulary.
4
Evaluate the argument for the flaw of circular reasoning.
Because the premise is logically identical to the conclusion, the argument offers no independent support and presupposes the truth of its own claim.
An argument that relies on a premise that merely restates the conclusion commits the fallacy of circular reasoning (begging the question).

Anahtar Kavram

Circular Reasoning (Begging the Question)
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 1359Soru →

Ornithologist: Ten years ago, our city implemented a 'Dark Sky' ordinance to reduce nighttime light pollution, which disorients migrating warblers and causes fatal building collisions. Since then, the population of warblers migrating through the city has continued to decline. Critics claim the ordinance failed to protect the birds. However, this is unwarranted. The continued decline is actually caused by the recent, rapid deforestation of the warblers' southern wintering grounds.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to strengthen the ornithologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Populations of bird species that migrate through the city but spend their winters in protected nature reserves have remained stable over the past decade.

Cevap

The option stating that populations of bird species migrating through the city but wintering in protected reserves have remained stable.
The correct answer acts as a scientific control group. If the Dark Sky ordinance had failed, all birds migrating through the city would still be declining. By establishing that other bird species migrating through the exact same city are stable because they winter in protected areas, it proves two things simultaneously: the city's ordinance successfully eliminated the local threat, and the lack of protected wintering grounds is the true variable causing the warblers' decline.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion of the argument.
The ornithologist concludes that the continued decline in the warbler population is caused by southern deforestation, not by a failure of the city's Dark Sky ordinance.
Understanding the precise claim is required to know what needs strengthening.
2
Analyze the evidence and identify the logical gap.
The evidence shows warbler populations are still declining despite the ordinance. The gap is the assumption that the ordinance actually worked and that an entirely different variable (deforestation) is now solely responsible for the decline.
Strengthening often involves closing the gap by validating the assumption or ruling out alternate explanations.
3
Formulate a strengthening strategy.
Look for an answer choice that acts as a control group: a scenario where the birds experience the city's ordinance but do NOT experience the deforestation.
In causal arguments, demonstrating 'cause without effect' or validating a control group effectively isolates the true causal variable.
4
Evaluate the options against the strategy.
The correct answer shows that birds migrating through the city but wintering elsewhere are doing fine, proving the city is safe and the wintering grounds are the problem.
This directly confirms the ornithologist's defense of the ordinance and indictment of the deforestation.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Causal Arguments via Control Groups
Soru 1360Soru →

Review the following short arguments, each of which contains a reasoning flaw related to time shifts. Match each argument to the description that most accurately identifies its specific temporal fallacy.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

NovaCorp has maintained peak profitability for a decade by focusing exclusively on physical retail stores. Therefore, maintaining this exclusive focus guarantees NovaCorp's continued profitability over the next decade.
Records dating back three centuries show the regional aquifer has never dropped below a reserve of 40%. Consequently, the new agricultural irrigation initiative cannot possibly deplete the aquifer.
Since the introduction of electric vehicles, the percentage of citizens using public transit has decreased slightly each year. It is clear that public transit systems will eventually lose all their ridership.
When the city suspended downtown parking fees in 1995, local retail revenue soared for six months. Thus, suspending downtown parking fees next month will certainly produce a comparable retail boom.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

NovaCorp matches the assumption of persisting business conditions; the aquifer matches the assumption that historical absence proves future impossibility; the transit argument matches the unwarranted projection of a trend to zero; the parking fee argument matches the assumption of static background circumstances for a past intervention.
Each argument inappropriately leverages past or present data to make an unwarranted claim about the future. By identifying the specific nature of the premise (a trend, a historical absence, a past success, a discrete past policy) and the nature of the conclusion (absolute zero, impossibility, guaranteed future success, identical policy outcome), each argument can be mapped to its precise abstract flaw description.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the NovaCorp argument to isolate the time shift.
It infers future guaranteed success from the past success of an ongoing strategy.
This corresponds to taking for granted that a strategy succeeding under past conditions will remain optimal.
2
Analyze the regional aquifer argument.
It infers future physical impossibility of depletion based entirely on a historical lack of occurrence.
This corresponds to treating the historical absence of an extreme event as definitive proof it cannot happen.
3
Analyze the public transit argument.
It extrapolates an ongoing, slight annual decline to a conclusion of absolute zero.
This corresponds to projecting a directional trend indefinitely without considering a plateau.
4
Analyze the downtown parking fees argument.
It infers that repeating a discrete past action from 1995 will yield the exact same result today.
This corresponds to treating a historical correlation as a causal guarantee for a future intervention.

Anahtar Kavram

Time Shift Flaws (Past vs. Future)
ÖncekiSayfa 68 / 198Sonraki
Tüm alıştırma soruları — LSAT | Examkin