Assumptions

201 soru

Soru 161Soru →

Anthropologist: Excavations at the ancient, strictly sedentary settlement of Kaelen have uncovered ceremonial vessels containing trace residues of the cacao plant. The Kaelen people are known to have had no contact with migratory groups. Because the cacao plant is native exclusively to regions located over five hundred miles south of Kaelen, the settlement's inhabitants must have maintained direct, long-distance trade networks extending into those southern regions to acquire the beans.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the anthropologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The inhabitants of Kaelen did not acquire the cacao beans through a series of short-distance exchanges involving geographically intermediate groups.

Cevap

The assumption that the inhabitants of Kaelen did not acquire the cacao beans through a series of short-distance exchanges involving geographically intermediate groups.
The correct answer properly bridges the gap between the origin of the beans and the specific nature of the trade. The author concludes that Kaelen had 'direct, long-distance trade networks'. For this to be true, we must assume they didn't just get the beans handed down through a chain of local, short-distance trades (intermediaries). If we negate this option—meaning they DID use intermediaries—then the author's conclusion that Kaelen itself maintained direct, long-distance networks is destroyed.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and the premises.
Conclusion: Kaelen maintained direct, long-distance trade networks to the south. Premises: Cacao is native only to the south (500+ miles away), Kaelen was sedentary, and they had no contact with migratory groups.
Isolating the core argument structure is the necessary first step to spot the logical leap.
2
Spot the logical gap in the reasoning.
The argument leaps directly from the fact that the beans originated far away to the conclusion that Kaelen must have traded DIRECTLY with that distant region.
Identifying the gap helps predict the necessary assumption required to bridge it.
3
Apply the Negation Technique to the choices.
Negating the correct choice ('They DID acquire the beans through intermediate groups') introduces an alternative explanation that completely destroys the conclusion that they maintained 'direct' trade networks.
The Negation Technique is the definitive and most accurate test for identifying a Necessary Assumption.

Anahtar Kavram

Applying the Negation Technique
Soru 162Soru →

Match each stimulus argument (Left) with the necessary supporter assumption (Right) required to logically bridge the gap between its premise and its conclusion. Note that all arguments relate to the fictional ecology of Vespera Valley, requiring careful attention to the specific logical structure of each rather than shared vocabulary.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Since the predatory Kestrel was introduced to Vespera Valley, the native Silver Vole population has plummeted. Therefore, the Silver Vole must lack the natural camouflage required to evade avian predators.
The invasive Crimson Vine in Vespera Valley aggressively outcompetes native understory plants for sunlight and soil nutrients. Consequently, the valley is currently experiencing a severe collapse in overall ecological biodiversity.
If the Vespera Valley council restricts human access to the eastern trails, the breeding grounds of the Azure Warbler will remain undisturbed. Therefore, restricting human access to those trails will protect the Azure Warbler from imminent extinction.
A recent survey of Vespera Valley reveals that the percentage of oak trees exhibiting leaf-blight is much higher in the northern quadrant than in the southern quadrant. Clearly, the northern quadrant has experienced higher volumes of acidic rainfall.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct pairings match each stimulus to the assumption that connects its unique premise to its unique conclusion. The Kestrel argument pairs with the camouflage assumption; the Crimson Vine argument pairs with the biodiversity assumption; the Azure Warbler argument pairs with the extinction assumption; and the oak tree argument pairs with the acidic rainfall assumption.
Each correct pair represents a classic Supporter Assumption relationship. In each stimulus, the author introduces a completely new concept in the conclusion (camouflage, biodiversity collapse, imminent extinction, acidic rainfall) that was not established by the premises. A valid Supporter Assumption must act as a missing premise, explicitly linking the evidence provided to the new concept introduced in the conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Isolate the conclusion of the first argument and identify any 'rogue' elements—concepts that appear in the conclusion but were never mentioned in the premises.
In the Kestrel argument, 'lack the natural camouflage' is the rogue element.
A Supporter Assumption must explicitly bridge the gap between the new information in the conclusion and the established facts in the premises.
2
Scan the available assumptions for a statement that explicitly links the premise to the rogue conclusion element.
The assumption regarding a plummeting prey population lacking 'natural camouflage' perfectly bridges the gap for the Kestrel argument.
This establishes the necessary conditional relationship to make the conclusion logically valid.
3
Repeat this process for the remaining arguments, ignoring shared domain vocabulary (like 'Vespera Valley') and focusing strictly on the logical leaps.
The 'collapse in ecological biodiversity' links to 'displacement of understory plants'; 'protection from extinction' links to 'undisturbed breeding grounds'; and 'acidic rainfall' links to 'leaf-blight'.
In complex matching scenarios where all items share a theme, structural mapping prevents falling for semantic distractors.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Soru 163Soru →

Policy Analyst: Every nation that has adopted a strictly digital currency system has experienced a drastic reduction in petty tax evasion. Our nation is scheduled to fully implement a strictly digital currency system within the next two years. Therefore, the implementation of this system will undoubtedly generate a substantial increase in our nation's overall tax revenues.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the policy analyst's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The financial gains resulting from a drastic reduction in petty tax evasion will not be entirely offset by simultaneous losses in other areas of tax collection.

Cevap

The statement ensuring that the financial gains resulting from a drastic reduction in petty tax evasion will not be entirely offset by simultaneous losses in other areas of tax collection.
The author predicts a substantial increase in OVERALL tax revenues based entirely on the expectation of reducing ONE specific form of tax evasion. For this prediction to be valid, the financial gains generated by stopping petty tax evasion cannot simply be erased by new losses elsewhere. When we apply the negation technique to the correct option—assuming the gains ARE entirely offset by other losses—overall tax revenues would not increase at all. Because this negation completely destroys the conclusion, the statement is logically necessary for the argument to survive.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core conclusion and the premises.
Conclusion: Implementing the digital currency system will generate a substantial increase in our nation's overall tax revenues. Premises: Digital currency reduces petty tax evasion, and our nation will adopt it.
Isolating the conclusion helps identify the exact logical leap the author is making.
2
Spot the logical gap in the reasoning.
The premises guarantee a reduction in ONE specific type of lost revenue (petty evasion), but the conclusion confidently predicts an increase in OVERALL tax revenues.
Necessary assumptions often serve to bridge the gap between a narrow premise and a broad conclusion.
3
Apply the Negation Technique to test candidate choices.
Negating the correct statement yields: 'The financial gains WILL be entirely offset by simultaneous losses in other areas.' If this were true, overall tax revenues would remain flat or decrease, completely destroying the conclusion.
The defining characteristic of a necessary assumption is that its logical negation destroys the argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Applying the Negation Technique to Defender Assumptions
Soru 164Soru →

Musicologist: The recently uncovered piano sonata manuscript is undoubtedly an authentic late work by the renowned composer Johannes Berg. The manuscript features a highly unorthodox harmonic progression in its second movement. Historical records demonstrate that Berg was the only composer of his era to experiment with this specific progression, an innovation he developed exclusively during the final three years of his life.

The musicologist's argument requires the assumption that the manuscript was not created by a later musician or forger who deliberately imitated Berg's unique harmonic progression.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement accurately presents a necessary assumption for the musicologist's argument. The argument leaps from the fact that Berg was the only composer in his era to use the progression to the absolute conclusion that this manuscript must be his authentic work. For this conclusion to hold true, it must be the case that a later imitator or forger did not create the manuscript. Because negating this statement directly invalidates the conclusion, it is logically required.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and premises of the argument.
Conclusion: The manuscript is an authentic late work by Johannes Berg. Premises: It contains an unorthodox harmonic progression. Berg was the only composer of his era to use this progression, which he developed late in life.
Analyzing the argument's structure is the first step to identifying any logical gaps between the evidence and the conclusion.
2
Identify the logical gap in the reasoning.
The argument assumes that because Berg was the only one in his era to use the progression, no one else from a later era could have written the manuscript.
The premise restricts the uniqueness of the progression to 'his era', leaving open the possibility of later imitations or forgeries.
3
Apply the Negation Technique to the provided statement.
Negated statement: The manuscript WAS created by a later musician or forger who deliberately imitated Berg's unique harmonic progression.
The Negation Technique tests if an assumption is truly necessary. If the negated form destroys the argument, the original statement is a necessary assumption.
4
Evaluate the effect of the negated statement on the conclusion.
If a later forger created the manuscript, then it is NOT an authentic work by Johannes Berg. The conclusion is entirely invalidated.
Since the negated statement destroys the argument's conclusion, the original statement is a logically necessary assumption.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Necessary Assumptions (Negation Technique)
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 165Soru →

Musicologist: Recently, a collection of manuscripts containing complex polyphonic musical notation was found sealed within the original, undisturbed 11th-century stonework of the Valerius Monastery. Previously, historians believed that polyphonic music was entirely unknown in this region until the 13th century. Because the stonework has remained completely intact since the monastery's construction, it is clear that the 11th-century monks who lived at the Valerius Monastery practiced polyphonic musical composition.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the musicologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The polyphonic manuscripts were not simply documents created by outsiders that the monks stored in the stonework without ever engaging in polyphonic musical composition themselves.

Cevap

The assumption that the manuscripts were not merely stored by monks who never engaged in the composition themselves.
The argument assumes that the mere presence of the manuscripts implies the monks actively practiced the musical composition. The correct answer defends against the possibility that the manuscripts were just stored artifacts. By applying the Negation Technique—assuming the manuscripts were just documents created by outsiders that the monks stored without ever practicing the music—the argument's conclusion is completely destroyed. This proves the assumption is strictly necessary.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion.
The 11th-century monks who lived at the Valerius Monastery practiced polyphonic musical composition.
This is the core claim the musicologist is attempting to prove based on the physical evidence.
2
Identify the premises supporting the conclusion.
Manuscripts with polyphonic notation were found sealed in the intact 11th-century stonework of the monastery.
This establishes a timeline and physical presence of the notation at the monastery.
3
Locate the logical gap between the premises and the conclusion.
The argument equates the physical presence of a document in a building with the active practice of the document's contents by the building's inhabitants.
Possessing or storing an item does not inherently prove that the possessor understands or practices the skills contained within it.
4
Apply the Negation Technique to the correct option.
Negating the correct answer yields: 'The manuscripts WERE simply documents created by outsiders that the monks stored in the stonework without ever engaging in the composition themselves.'
If this negated statement is true, the conclusion completely falls apart, proving the assumption is logically necessary for the argument to survive.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Necessary Assumptions
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 166Soru →

Chief Engineer: A spacecraft's life-support system can sustain a crew during a deep-space voyage only if it features a regenerative carbon dioxide scrubber. Therefore, any spacecraft commissioned for the Outer Planets Initiative must feature a regenerative carbon dioxide scrubber.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the chief engineer's argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Every spacecraft commissioned for the Outer Planets Initiative requires a life-support system that can sustain a crew during a deep-space voyage.

Cevap

Every spacecraft commissioned for the Outer Planets Initiative requires a life-support system that can sustain a crew during a deep-space voyage.
The argument relies on conditional reasoning. The premise establishes that sustaining a crew in deep space requires a regenerative scrubber. The conclusion claims that spacecraft in the Outer Planets Initiative must have this scrubber. To logically connect the premise to the conclusion, the argument must assume that spacecraft in the Initiative are required to sustain a crew in deep space. Without this bridge, the premise about sustaining a crew would be entirely irrelevant to the Initiative's spacecraft.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core conditional premise provided in the argument.
Sustain a crew in deep space -> Features a regenerative scrubber.
The phrase 'only if' introduces a necessary condition that must be met.
2
Identify the main conclusion drawn by the chief engineer.
Outer Planets Initiative spacecraft -> Features a regenerative scrubber.
The transition word 'Therefore' indicates the final claim the author is trying to prove.
3
Identify the logical gap between the premise and the conclusion.
The argument jumps from a requirement for sustaining a crew to a requirement for Outer Planets Initiative spacecraft.
To prove that the Initiative spacecraft need scrubbers, there must be a connecting link showing that these specific spacecraft are required to sustain a crew.
4
Formulate the necessary assumption and verify it using the Negation Test.
Assumption: Outer Planets Initiative spacecraft -> Sustain a crew. Negation: Some Initiative spacecraft do not need to sustain a crew. If the negation is true, the conclusion fails because those spacecraft wouldn't strictly need the scrubber.
The Negation Test confirms that this conditional bridge is an absolute logical requirement for the argument to hold.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying necessary assumptions to bridge structural gaps in conditional reasoning chains.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 167Soru →

Legal Theorist: A judicial system is truly equitable only if its appellate courts consistently overturn convictions that are based on coerced confessions. In the nation of Veridia, appellate judges strictly adhere to a doctrine prioritizing the finality of judgments, a doctrine that absolutely precludes them from re-evaluating the credibility of any witness testimonies established during the original trial. Consequently, despite its otherwise robust constitutional protections, Veridia’s judicial system fails to meet the standard of true equity.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the legal theorist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: An appellate court cannot consistently overturn convictions based on coerced confessions without re-evaluating the credibility of witness testimonies established during the original trial.

Cevap

The correct answer states that an appellate court cannot consistently overturn convictions based on coerced confessions without re-evaluating the credibility of witness testimonies established during the original trial.
The argument concludes that Veridia is not equitable because its doctrine prevents appellate courts from re-evaluating witness credibility. However, the explicit requirement for equity provided in the first premise is the ability to consistently overturn coerced confessions. To draw the conclusion, the argument must assume a structural link between these two distinct concepts. The correct answer provides this bridge by stating that re-evaluating witness credibility is a necessary prerequisite for overturning coerced confessions. If this were not true (meaning courts could overturn coerced confessions without re-evaluating witnesses), Veridia's doctrine would not inherently prevent it from being equitable, and the argument would collapse.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main conclusion.
The conclusion is: Veridia's judicial system fails to meet the standard of true equity.
Identifying the conclusion establishes the endpoint of the logical chain.
2
Identify the stated requirements for the conclusion.
Premise 1 states: A system is equitable ONLY IF it consistently overturns convictions based on coerced confessions (Equitable -> Overturn Coerced).
This establishes the conditional framework required to prove a system is not equitable (i.e., failing to overturn coerced confessions).
3
Analyze the specific evidence provided about the subject (Veridia).
Premise 2 states: Veridia's courts are precluded from re-evaluating the credibility of witness testimonies.
This identifies the disconnected 'rogue' element in the premises that must be logically linked to the requirement found in Step 2.
4
Bridge the logical gap between the evidence and the requirement.
To conclude that Veridia fails the equity test, its inability to re-evaluate witness credibility must inherently prevent it from overturning coerced confessions.
Without this unstated bridge, Veridia's specific procedural limitation would have no logical bearing on its ability to meet the condition for true equity.
5
Apply the Negation Test to verify necessity.
Negating the correct answer yields: 'An appellate court CAN overturn coerced confessions WITHOUT re-evaluating witness testimonies.' If this were true, Veridia could still satisfy the requirement for equity, destroying the conclusion.
The Negation Test is the definitive proof that an assumption is logically required by the argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Soru 168Soru →

Financial analyst: To boost our country's stagnant national savings rate, lawmakers have proposed replacing the current flat income tax with a comprehensive consumption tax. Because a consumption tax applies only to money spent on goods and services, rather than on money earned, citizens will be heavily incentivized to save a larger portion of their income to minimize their tax burden. Consequently, transitioning to this consumption tax system will successfully alleviate the national savings crisis without causing a decline in overall government tax revenue.

Which of the following statements are necessary assumptions upon which the financial analyst's argument depends? (Select all that apply)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The anticipated reduction in citizen spending on goods and services will not precipitate an economic downturn that ultimately lowers the national savings rate.; The total tax revenue generated by the new consumption tax will be at least equal to the revenue currently generated by the flat income tax.

Cevap

The argument necessarily assumes both that the reduction in spending will not cause a savings-destroying economic downturn, and that the new consumption tax will generate at least as much revenue as the old flat tax.
The correct options highlight required conditions for the argument's dual conclusion to hold true. The argument concludes that the new tax will successfully alleviate the national savings crisis without causing a decline in overall government tax revenue. First, if the anticipated reduction in spending precipitated an economic downturn that lowered the national savings rate, the crisis would not be alleviated. Second, if the total tax revenue generated by the new consumption tax were less than the current flat income tax revenue, there would be a decline in government tax revenue. Negating either of these statements causes a critical piece of the argument to collapse, proving they are necessary assumptions.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's core structure (premises and main conclusion).
Premise: The tax applies to spending, so citizens will save more. Conclusion: The transition will alleviate the savings crisis AND will not cause a decline in overall government tax revenue.
Understanding the exact claims made in the conclusion is essential, as necessary assumptions must bridge gaps leading to these specific claims.
2
Analyze the logical gap regarding the 'savings crisis' claim.
The argument assumes that citizens saving a larger portion of their income will actually result in a net increase in the national savings rate, without negative secondary effects counteracting this.
To prove the transition 'successfully alleviates' the crisis, the anticipated behavior (reduced spending) must not trigger consequences that undermine the goal.
3
Analyze the logical gap regarding the 'government tax revenue' claim.
The argument assumes that the amount collected from taxing the newly reduced spending levels will at least match the amount previously collected from the flat income tax.
To prove the transition will not cause a 'decline in overall government tax revenue,' the mathematical reality of the new tax collections must equal or exceed the old collections.
4
Apply the Negation Technique to the options to identify which are logically necessary.
Negating the statement about the economic downturn directly refutes the claim that the crisis is alleviated. Negating the statement about the tax revenue amount directly refutes the claim that revenue won't decline.
The defining characteristic of a necessary assumption is that its logical negation destroys the argument's conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Necessary Assumptions using the Negation Technique on compound conclusions.
Soru 169Soru →

Historian: The massive stone structures found at the Zenith archaeological site were undoubtedly built by the ancient Omic culture. The Omic were the only people in the region known to possess the advanced bronze tools capable of cutting such dense granite. Furthermore, the quarries where this specific type of granite is found are located deep within what was historically Omic territory.

Which of the following statements, if logically negated, would fatally undermine the historian's central conclusion? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The ancient Omic culture did not supply their advanced bronze tools to other groups living within the same region.; No later civilization occupied the Zenith site and independently developed bronze tools capable of cutting the dense granite.

Cevap

The correct statements are that the Omic did not supply their tools to other regional groups, and that no later civilization independently developed such tools.
Both correct statements represent necessary assumptions because negating them introduces fatal flaws into the historian's logic. If the Omic traded their tools, or if a later civilization independently invented them, the central claim that the Omic 'undoubtedly' built the structures falls apart entirely.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's core structure.
Conclusion: The Omic culture built the Zenith structures. Premises: They were the only regional group known to have the required tools, and the granite came from their historical territory.
Understanding the precise premises and conclusion is necessary to determine what logical gaps exist.
2
Apply the Negation Technique to evaluate the first potentially correct assumption.
Negating the statement about not supplying tools yields: 'The Omic DID supply tools to others.' This introduces alternative groups who could have built the structures, destroying the argument.
A required assumption, when logically negated, must fatally undermine the conclusion.
3
Continue applying the Negation Technique to find the second necessary assumption.
Negating the statement about later civilizations yields: 'A later civilization DID occupy the site and develop the tools.' This provides a fatal alternative explanation for the structures.
The question requires identifying multiple statements that function as necessary assumptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Applying the Negation Technique
Tahmini Süre:1m 45s
Soru 170Soru →

Review the four abbreviated logical arguments below. Each argument contains a flawed inference due to a missing conceptual link between its stated premise and its conclusion. Pair each argument with the specific unstated supporter assumption required to logically bridge that gap.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Archaeology: The ceramic vessels recovered from the Oakhaven excavation contain concentrated traces of fermented maize. Therefore, the inhabitants of this ancient settlement must have operated within a highly stratified social hierarchy.
Economics: The central bank’s newly adopted macroeconomic strategy prioritizes inflation suppression over achieving full employment. Consequently, this strategy will inevitably diminish the collective bargaining power of domestic labor unions.
Science: The theoretical model developed by the research team relies exclusively on non-linear stochastic equations. Therefore, the team's framework cannot possibly generate deterministic long-term forecasts.
Policy: The revised municipal zoning ordinance explicitly mandates high-density residential architecture in the downtown sector. As a result, the fundamental historical character of that sector will be irreversibly compromised.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Archaeology pairs with the assumption about fermented maize being exclusive to stratified societies. Economics pairs with the assumption that failing to prioritize full employment undermines bargaining power. Science pairs with the contrapositive assumption regarding deterministic forecasts and mathematical elements. Policy pairs with the assumption linking high-density architecture to irreversibly compromised historical character.
Each correct pairing provides the exact logical link missing from the abbreviated argument. A valid supporter assumption must take the distinct evidence offered in the premise and connect it explicitly to the novel term introduced in the conclusion, often using conditional logic (e.g., 'If [Premise Concept], then [Conclusion Concept]').

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze each argument to isolate the premise and identify the 'rogue element' introduced in the conclusion.
Identified rogue elements: 'highly stratified social hierarchy' (Archaeology), 'diminish collective bargaining power' (Economics), 'cannot generate deterministic long-term forecasts' (Science), and 'irreversibly compromised historical character' (Policy).
Supporter assumptions must explicitly connect new or unstated concepts in the conclusion back to the evidence provided in the premises.
2
Evaluate the available assumptions to find the precise logical bridge for the Science argument, which requires recognizing a contrapositive structure.
Matched Science to the assumption stating 'Any theoretical model capable of generating... forecasts must incorporate... elements other than... stochastic equations.'
This is the contrapositive of the required direct link: If exclusively non-linear stochastic -> Cannot generate deterministic forecasts.
3
Match the remaining arguments by finding the assumptions that guarantee the rogue conclusions based on the given premises.
Completed the pairings: l1 to r3, l2 to r4, and l4 to r2.
Each selected assumption operates as a missing premise that, when added to the original argument, makes the conclusion logically valid.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Soru 171Soru →

Analyze the following arguments, each of which relies on an unstated assumption involving conditional logic. Match each argument to the necessary or sufficient assumption that logically bridges the gap between its premises and its conclusion.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

The metropolitan area will drastically reduce its carbon footprint if commuters adopt mass transit en masse. The city council's newly approved subsidy plan aggressively targets suburban train ticket prices. Therefore, the metropolitan area will drastically reduce its carbon footprint.
A geological fault line is highly active only if it registers micro-tremors on a weekly basis. The Cascade fault system is known to be highly active. Therefore, the Cascade fault system must have recently exhibited significant geothermal venting.
The university's endowment will grow significantly this year. After all, the endowment grows significantly whenever alumni donations increase, and the university recently launched a highly praised career networking platform.
A renewable energy grid cannot be considered stable unless it includes massive battery storage facilities. Therefore, the coastal wind farm project's new grid will not be considered stable, because it relies heavily on short-term federal grants.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Argument 1 matches with the commuter subsidy bridge; Argument 2 matches with the contrapositive linking venting to tremors; Argument 3 matches with the platform-to-donations guarantee; and Argument 4 matches with the federal grants to battery storage connection.
Each correct pair seamlessly connects the factual premise of the argument to the conditional trigger required to validate the conclusion. When necessary, the assumption is presented in its logically equivalent contrapositive form (as seen in the geology argument).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Map the formal logic of each argument's premises and conclusion.
Identify the conditional triggers: 'if' (sufficient), 'only if' (necessary), 'whenever' (sufficient), and 'unless' (necessary).
Accurately diagramming the stated conditions is required before the missing link can be identified.
2
Identify the 'dangling' terms in the premises and conclusion to find the logical gap.
For example, in the geological argument, the premises arrive at 'registers micro-tremors', but the conclusion introduces 'geothermal venting'.
The correct assumption must perfectly bridge these unmatched terms without introducing outside information.
3
Evaluate the assumption choices for direct conditional links or logically equivalent contrapositives.
The geological gap (Micro-tremors -> Geothermal Venting) is satisfied by finding its contrapositive (No Venting -> No Micro-tremors) in the available choices.
Test makers frequently hide the correct bridging assumption by stating it in its contrapositive form.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging logical gaps using sufficient/necessary assumptions and recognizing their contrapositives.
Soru 172Soru →

Technology policy analyst: A newly mandated chemical additive, PetroZ, reduces friction in commercial power plant turbines by 15 percent. This reduced friction leads to lower operating temperatures and significantly extends the lifespan of internal turbine parts. Therefore, power companies that comply with the mandate to use PetroZ will spend less money on turbine maintenance overall.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the technology policy analyst's argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The use of PetroZ does not cause damage to the turbines that would result in repair costs exceeding the savings from the extended lifespan of internal parts.

Cevap

The correct assumption is that the use of PetroZ does not cause damage to the turbines that would result in repair costs exceeding the savings from the extended lifespan of internal parts.
The argument concludes that using PetroZ will lower overall maintenance costs because it saves money by extending the lifespan of internal parts. However, for overall costs to decrease, the new additive must not simultaneously introduce new, more expensive maintenance issues. This option acts as a necessary 'defender' assumption; if PetroZ did cause damage resulting in repair costs that exceed the savings, the conclusion would immediately fail.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core argument's premises and conclusion.
Premise: PetroZ reduces friction, which extends the lifespan of internal turbine parts. Conclusion: Using PetroZ will reduce overall turbine maintenance costs.
Understanding the exact scope of the premises and conclusion is required to spot the logical gap.
2
Identify the logical gap.
The argument assumes that saving money on one aspect of maintenance (internal parts) guarantees a reduction in overall maintenance costs.
Overall costs are a sum of many factors; a decrease in one area only leads to a net decrease if other areas do not simultaneously increase by a larger amount.
3
Evaluate the options using the Negation Technique.
Negating the correct option yields: 'PetroZ DOES cause damage resulting in repair costs that exceed the savings.' This directly contradicts the conclusion that overall maintenance costs will decrease.
A necessary assumption must destroy the conclusion when negated.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Defender Assumptions using the Negation Technique
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 173Soru →

Sociologist: During periods of rapid economic transition, a society can maintain high levels of civic engagement only if it possesses robust local institutions. Over the last decade, the nation of Oakhaven has undergone a rapid economic transition, which coincided with the widespread adoption of hyper-connected digital platforms. In this same period, Oakhaven's civic engagement levels have plummeted. It is clear, therefore, that the adoption of hyper-connected digital platforms eroded Oakhaven’s local institutions.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the sociologist’s argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The decline in Oakhaven’s civic engagement was not caused entirely by factors that left its robust local institutions intact.

Cevap

The correct answer is the statement that the decline in Oakhaven’s civic engagement was not caused entirely by factors that left its robust local institutions intact.
The argument concludes that digital platforms 'eroded' (destroyed or degraded) Oakhaven's local institutions based solely on the fact that civic engagement plummeted. Because robust institutions are only a necessary condition for high civic engagement, not a sufficient one, civic engagement could easily plummet while institutions remain perfectly intact. For the conclusion to hold, the author must assume the institutions did not remain intact. Applying the Negation Test confirms this: if the decline in civic engagement WAS caused entirely by factors that left the institutions intact, then the institutions were not eroded. This completely destroys the conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditional premise.
The rule is: High Civic Engagement (during rapid transition) -> Robust Local Institutions.
Identifying the formal logic provides the boundaries of what is factually established.
2
Analyze the evidence and conclusion.
Evidence: Civic engagement dropped. Conclusion: Digital platforms eroded (destroyed/degraded) the local institutions.
Understanding how the author moves from evidence to conclusion reveals the logical gap.
3
Identify the logical flaw in the argument.
The author sees that the sufficient condition (High Civic Engagement) is absent, and illegally assumes the necessary condition (Robust Local Institutions) must also be absent (eroded).
Civic engagement could plummet for reasons entirely unrelated to the local institutions, leaving those institutions perfectly intact.
4
Apply the Negation Test to find the necessary assumption.
Negate the correct option: 'The decline WAS caused entirely by factors that left the institutions intact.' If the institutions are intact, they were not eroded. This completely destroys the conclusion.
A necessary assumption is a statement that must be true for the conclusion to survive. If its negation destroys the argument, it is the correct answer.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Necessary Assumptions via the Negation Test and recognizing the difference between Necessary/Sufficient conditions.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 174Soru →

Marine Biologist: The foundational organisms in the aphotic Midnight Trench ecosystem derive their energy exclusively from hydrogen sulfide. Surviving the extreme toxicity of this compound requires these organisms to constantly dedicate substantial energy to cellular repair, which in turn results in an exceptionally high baseline metabolic rate. Therefore, these organisms must have significantly shorter lifespans than typical photosynthetic marine organisms, and the ecosystem's broader food web must be unusually vulnerable to sudden collapse.

Which of the following statements function as necessary supporter assumptions required to bridge the logical gaps in the marine biologist's argument? (Select all that apply)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: An exceptionally high baseline metabolic rate is incompatible with a lifespan as long as that of typical photosynthetic marine organisms.; Ecosystems whose foundational organisms dedicate substantial energy to cellular repair have food webs that are unusually vulnerable to sudden collapse.

Cevap

The statements connecting the high metabolic rate to shorter lifespans, and connecting the cellular repair energy demand to food web vulnerability.
The argument contains a compound conclusion with two entirely new concepts: 'shorter lifespans' and 'vulnerable to sudden collapse'. To validate the conclusion, we must bridge the premises to these new concepts. One correct statement connects the premise of an 'exceptionally high baseline metabolic rate' to the conclusion of a 'shorter lifespan'. The other correct statement connects the premise of 'dedicating substantial energy to cellular repair' to the conclusion of a 'vulnerable food web'. Both are logically necessary for the dual conclusion to hold true.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core premises of the argument.
The foundational organisms use hydrogen sulfide, require substantial energy for cellular repair, and consequently have an exceptionally high baseline metabolic rate.
Understanding the exact evidence provided is the first step in finding the logical gaps.
2
Identify the main conclusion.
The conclusion contains two distinct claims: 1) The organisms have shorter lifespans than typical photosynthetic organisms, and 2) the food web is unusually vulnerable to collapse.
Supporter assumptions must directly link premise elements to rogue elements introduced in the conclusion.
3
Locate the logical gaps.
There is no stated connection between 'high metabolic rate' and 'shorter lifespans', nor between 'cellular repair/metabolic rate' and 'vulnerable food webs'.
In LSAT logic, you cannot introduce new concepts in the conclusion without a bridging assumption.
4
Select the assumptions that specifically bridge these gaps.
One correct option bridges high metabolic rate to shorter lifespans. The other bridges cellular repair to food web vulnerability.
Since the question asks to select all that apply, both required bridging statements must be chosen.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 175Soru →

Linguist: The indigenous Vana language uses a highly complex tonal system to convey grammatical tense. Researchers have documented that Vana children successfully master this tonal system by age three, significantly earlier than children in other cultures master grammatical tense. This rapid mastery must result from the traditional high-protein Vana diet, which significantly accelerates the physical development of the auditory cortex during early childhood.

Which of the following statements are necessary assumptions required by the linguist's argument? (Select all that apply)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Vana children consume the traditional high-protein diet prior to or during the time they are mastering the tonal system.; The physical development of the auditory cortex is actually involved in a child's ability to learn a tonal system that conveys tense.

Cevap

The necessary assumptions are that the children consume the diet during the relevant developmental window, and that auditory cortex development plays a necessary role in learning the tonal system.
The argument relies on a specific causal mechanism: Diet -> Auditory Cortex Development -> Early Mastery of Tonal Tense. For this chain to be logically possible, the proposed cause (the diet) must actually be present at the appropriate developmental stage, and the biological mechanism (the auditory cortex) must actually govern the observed linguistic outcome. The argument absolutely requires both of these unstated premises to hold true.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core structure of the argument.
Premise: Vana children master a tonal tense system unusually early. Conclusion: This mastery is caused by a high-protein diet that accelerates auditory cortex development.
Understanding the exact causal mechanism proposed by the author is essential for identifying unstated premises.
2
Locate the logical gaps in the proposed causal chain.
Gap 1: Are the children actually exposed to the cause (the diet) while they are experiencing the effect? Gap 2: Is the proposed biological mechanism (the auditory cortex) actually relevant to the observed effect (learning tonal tense)?
Necessary assumptions in causal arguments typically bridge these exact types of unstated logical gaps.
3
Apply the Negation Test to evaluate the candidate answers.
Negating the correct statements completely severs the causal chain. If they don't eat the diet early enough, or if the cortex has nothing to do with tonal tense, the conclusion is impossible.
The Negation Test is the definitive way to prove whether an assumption is strictly necessary.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Necessary Assumptions in Causal Arguments
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 176Soru →

Astrophysicist: According to leading cosmological models, a spiral galaxy can maintain its structural integrity over billions of years only if it is enveloped by a massive dark matter halo. The recently observed spiral galaxy VCC-128 has maintained its structural integrity for at least four billion years. Yet, advanced sensor arrays have confirmed that VCC-128 emits no anomalous axion radiation. Therefore, the leading cosmological models must be incorrect.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the astrophysicist's argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Any galaxy that is enveloped by a massive dark matter halo emits anomalous axion radiation.

Cevap

The correct answer is the statement that any galaxy enveloped by a massive dark matter halo emits anomalous axion radiation.
The correct answer bridges the logical gap between the evidence (no anomalous axion radiation) and the conclusion (models requiring dark matter halos are incorrect). For the absence of axion radiation to invalidate a model requiring a dark matter halo, it must be true that a dark matter halo inherently produces such radiation. If this assumption were false, VCC-128 could possess a dark matter halo despite lacking axion radiation, rendering the argument's conclusion completely unsupported.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premises.
Premise 1: Leading models require a massive dark matter halo for a spiral galaxy to maintain integrity. Premise 2: VCC-128 maintains integrity. Premise 3: VCC-128 emits no anomalous axion radiation.
Understanding the core evidence is the first step in analyzing logical gaps.
2
Identify the argument's conclusion.
Conclusion: The leading cosmological models must be incorrect.
Locating the conclusion highlights what the author is trying to prove.
3
Locate the conceptual gap between the premises and the conclusion.
The models deal with 'massive dark matter halos', but the final evidence involves 'anomalous axion radiation'. The author jumps from the absence of axion radiation to the absence of a dark matter halo (which would invalidate the models).
Supporter assumptions always link rogue elements in the premises to elements in the conclusion.
4
Formulate the required bridging assumption.
The argument must assume that having a massive dark matter halo guarantees the emission of anomalous axion radiation (Halo -> Axion).
This bridge ensures that the lack of axion radiation logically proves the lack of a dark matter halo.
5
Apply the Negation Test to confirm the assumption.
Negating the correct statement yields: 'A massive dark matter halo does NOT necessarily emit anomalous axion radiation.' If this is true, VCC-128 could have a halo without emitting axions, entirely destroying the conclusion that the models are incorrect.
The Negation Test is the definitive method for proving a necessary assumption.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Soru 177Soru →

The Negation Technique is a critical tool for evaluating Necessary Assumptions on the LSAT. Match each candidate assumption statement on the left with its logically precise negation on the right.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Anyone who understands the complexities of the tax code will support the amendment.
Most of the artifacts discovered at the excavation site predate the Bronze Age.
Some of the politicians who campaigned on a platform of reform have accepted corporate donations.
The new transit system will be successful only if ridership increases by twenty percent.
Unless the city implements strict conservation measures, the reservoir will dry up by August.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The logically precise negations are formed by perfectly opposing the logical scope of quantifiers and conditional indicators. 'Anyone who...' negates to 'At least one person... does not'. 'Most...' negates to 'Half or fewer...'. 'Some...' negates to 'No...'. '...only if...' negates to '...successful, even though... does not...'. 'Unless...' negates to '...fails to implement, yet... does not...'.
To properly apply the Negation Technique on the LSAT, one must formulate the exact logical opposite of a statement. A statement and its negation must divide all possibilities into exactly two mutually exclusive outcomes. Over-negating (e.g., negating 'all' to 'none' instead of 'at least one is not') or failing to recognize conditional structures ('unless', 'only if') leads to incorrect assumption evaluation. These pairings demonstrate perfect logical boundaries.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze universal and existential quantifiers.
'Anyone' (all) negates to 'at least one is not'. 'Some' (at least one) negates to 'none'. 'Most' (more than half) negates to 'half or fewer'.
Accurate negation requires finding the exact mathematical or logical opposite without over-negating.
2
Analyze conditional indicators 'only if' and 'unless'.
'A only if B' negates to 'A and not B'. 'Unless A, B' means 'If not A, then B', which negates to 'Not A and Not B'.
Conditionals are negated by showing that the sufficient condition can occur even when the necessary condition fails.
3
Match each candidate statement to its logically equivalent negation.
Each statement is paired with the choice that logically destroys it.
This simulates the precise application of the Negation Technique used to validate Necessary Assumptions on the LSAT.

Anahtar Kavram

Logical Negation of Quantifiers and Conditionals
Soru 178Soru →

Agricultural researcher: A newly engineered strain of wheat produces a compound toxic to the wheat midge. In recent trials, plots planted with the engineered strain suffered 85 percent less midge damage than plots planted with conventional wheat. Since the engineered strain costs exactly the same to cultivate per acre as conventional wheat, replacing conventional wheat with the engineered strain across the agricultural sector will definitively result in a substantial increase in overall agricultural profitability.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the agricultural researcher's argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The current level of wheat midge damage to conventional wheat causes a substantial reduction in the overall profitability of cultivating it.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that the current level of wheat midge damage to conventional wheat causes a substantial reduction in the overall profitability of cultivating it.
The argument concludes that there will be a 'substantial increase' in profitability due to an 85 percent reduction in midge damage. For a reduction in damage to cause a substantial increase in profit, the damage itself must currently be a substantial drain on profit. If midge damage only costs farmers a few dollars a year (a negligible amount), reducing it by 85 percent will not substantially increase overall profitability.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the argument's structure to identify the premises and the conclusion.
Premises: The new strain suffers 85% less damage and costs the same to cultivate. Conclusion: Replacing conventional wheat with the new strain will result in a substantial increase in profitability.
Deconstructing the argument is the first step in identifying logical gaps between the evidence provided and the claim being made.
2
Identify the logical gap between the premises and the conclusion.
The argument jumps from a percentage reduction in damage directly to a definitive, substantial increase in overall profitability, assuming the damage was financially significant to begin with.
Necessary assumptions must bridge the gap between the provided evidence and the author's strong conclusion.
3
Apply the Negation Test to evaluate potential assumptions.
If we logically negate the correct statement—meaning current midge damage does NOT cause a substantial reduction in profitability—then solving the midge problem cannot possibly result in a substantial increase in profitability. The argument's conclusion completely collapses.
The Negation Test definitively proves whether a statement is strictly required for the conclusion to stand.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Necessary Assumptions via the Negation Test
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 179Soru →

Archaeologist: At the ancient site of Keltis, sophisticated wheel-thrown pottery completely replaces older, hand-built styles in excavation layers dating from 1200 BCE onward. Some scholars argue this sudden shift indicates that Keltis was conquered and repopulated by a foreign empire. However, chemical analysis confirms that the wheel-thrown pieces were made from the exact same local clay pits used for the earlier hand-built pieces. Therefore, the original inhabitants of Keltis must have independently invented the potter's wheel.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the archaeologist's argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: A foreign empire that conquered and repopulated Keltis would not have utilized the local clay pits to manufacture its own pottery.

Cevap

The argument depends on the assumption that a conquering foreign empire would not have utilized the local clay pits to manufacture its own pottery.
The correct answer acts as a 'defender' assumption. The author leaps from the fact that 'the clay is local' to the conclusion that 'the original inhabitants must have invented the wheel.' This logically requires that an invading empire would not have simply taken over the local clay pits to make their own wheel-thrown pottery. If an invading empire WOULD have used the local clay, the evidence of local clay cannot definitively rule out the invasion theory. By ruling out this alternative explanation, this statement is strictly necessary for the argument to function.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion.
The conclusion is: 'the original inhabitants of Keltis must have independently invented the potter's wheel.'
This establishes the author's main claim, which is countering the opposing theory of a foreign conquest.
2
Identify the primary premise supporting the conclusion.
The premise is: 'chemical analysis confirms that the wheel-thrown pieces were made from the exact same local clay pits used for the earlier hand-built pieces.'
This is the core evidence used to bridge the gap between the pottery transition and the claim of independent invention.
3
Spot the logical gap in the argument.
The author assumes that because the clay is local, the people making the pottery must be the original locals. This ignores the possibility that foreign conquerors simply took over the existing local resources.
An argument is flawed if its premises can be true while its conclusion is false. If conquerors used the local clay, the premise is true but the conclusion fails.
4
Apply the Negation Technique to the correct option.
Negating the correct answer yields: 'A foreign empire that conquered Keltis WOULD have utilized the local clay pits.' If this is true, the local clay evidence cannot disprove the conquest theory, and the argument collapses.
The defining characteristic of a necessary assumption is that its logical negation completely destroys the author's argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying a 'Defender' Necessary Assumption by ruling out a fatal alternate explanation.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 180Soru →

Philosopher of Science: For a theoretical framework to be deemed scientifically mature, its core postulates must yield observable consequences that can be strictly isolated from confounding variables. The newly proposed String-Loop synthesis yields observable consequences only at energy scales present in the early universe, where isolating variables from cosmic background fluctuations is fundamentally impossible. Therefore, the String-Loop synthesis cannot be utilized as a foundational text in graduate-level physics curricula.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the philosopher of science's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No theoretical framework should be utilized as a foundational text in graduate-level physics curricula unless it is deemed scientifically mature.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that no theoretical framework should be utilized as a foundational text unless it is deemed scientifically mature.
The correct answer explicitly bridges the gap between the premise's implication (String-Loop is not scientifically mature) and the conclusion (String-Loop cannot be utilized as a foundational text). By stating 'No framework should be utilized... unless it is mature', it establishes that being scientifically mature is a necessary condition for being utilized as a foundational text. Applying the Negation Test proves this: if we negate this statement to 'A framework can be utilized as a foundational text even if it is not scientifically mature', the philosopher's conclusion completely loses its logical support.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is that the String-Loop synthesis cannot be utilized as a foundational text in graduate-level physics curricula.
This is the final claim the philosopher aims to prove, signaled by the word 'Therefore.'
2
Break down the premises supporting this conclusion.
Premise 1 states that scientific maturity requires observable consequences that can be strictly isolated. Premise 2 states that String-Loop's consequences cannot be strictly isolated (due to cosmic background fluctuations).
Understanding the stated evidence is necessary to find the logical gap.
3
Determine what can be inferred directly from the premises.
By combining Premise 1 and Premise 2 using modus tollens, we can infer that the String-Loop synthesis is not scientifically mature.
Evaluating the deductive chain helps isolate the 'rogue' elements that remain unconnected to the conclusion.
4
Identify the conceptual gap between the premises and the conclusion.
The premises establish that String-Loop is 'not scientifically mature,' but the conclusion shifts to claiming it cannot be 'utilized as a foundational text.' The argument assumes a link between these two concepts.
A supporter assumption must bridge the gap by connecting the new element in the conclusion to the established evidence in the premises.
5
Formulate the required assumption and apply the Negation Test to the options.
The argument requires the assumption that 'If a framework is not scientifically mature, it cannot be utilized as a foundational text' (or its logical equivalent). The correct option matches this perfectly.
The Negation Test is the definitive method for confirming necessary assumptions on the LSAT; negating the correct option will destroy the argument's validity.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
ÖncekiSayfa 9 / 11Sonraki
Assumptions Alıştırma Soruları — LSAT — Sayfa 9 | Examkin