Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions

30 soru

Soru 1Soru →

Maritime Regulator: The proposed automated docking protocol relies entirely on continuous satellite telemetry rather than traditional visual guidance from harbormasters. Therefore, mandating this new protocol for all commercial vessels entering the bay will definitively decrease the frequency of docking collisions and subsequently reduce the port's overall operational liabilities.

Which of the following statements function as required assumptions to logically bridge the gaps in the regulator's argument? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Relying on continuous satellite telemetry rather than traditional visual guidance leads to fewer docking collisions.; A decrease in the frequency of docking collisions will result in a reduction of the port's overall operational liabilities.

Cevap

The correct selections are the statement connecting satellite telemetry to fewer collisions, and the statement connecting decreased collisions to reduced operational liabilities.
The argument contains a chain of reasoning with two explicit logical leaps. The author moves from a factual premise (the protocol uses satellite telemetry instead of visual guidance) to a claim about safety (fewer collisions) and then to a claim about finances (reduced liabilities). For the argument to be logically valid, it strictly requires assumptions that connect these disparate concepts together. The correct statements act as these necessary bridges.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core premises of the argument.
Premise: The new protocol uses satellite telemetry instead of visual guidance.
Deconstructing the argument structure is the first step in finding logical gaps.
2
Identify the core conclusions of the argument.
Conclusion: The new protocol will decrease docking collisions AND reduce overall operational liabilities.
Understanding exactly what the author is trying to prove reveals which terms are 'rogue' or unsupported.
3
Identify new terms in the conclusion that do not appear in the premises.
The concepts of 'decreased frequency of docking collisions' and 'reduced operational liabilities' are introduced in the conclusion without prior support.
In a Supporter Assumption question, rogue terms in the conclusion must be explicitly linked to the premises.
4
Formulate the required bridging statements.
Bridge 1: Satellite telemetry must lead to fewer collisions. Bridge 2: Fewer collisions must lead to reduced liabilities.
These connections are absolutely necessary for the argument's logic to flow from the premises to the stated conclusions.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying multiple logical gaps in an argument and selecting the exact supporter assumptions required to link rogue conclusion elements back to the premises.
Soru 2Soru →

Public Health Official: A newly constructed water treatment facility in the county uses a chemical agent called Florazine to eliminate bacterial contaminants. Florazine has been proven in laboratory settings to neutralize beneficial aquatic microbes alongside harmful bacteria. Because these beneficial microbes are critical for breaking down heavy metals in the water supply, implementing this new treatment process will ultimately lead to a rise in neurological disorders among county residents.

Which of the following statements must be assumed for the public health official's conclusion to be logically drawn? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The presence of unbroken-down heavy metals in the county's water supply increases the risk of neurological disorders among its residents.; The concentration of Florazine used at the new facility is sufficient to neutralize enough beneficial microbes to impede the breakdown of heavy metals.

Cevap

The correct assumptions are that the presence of heavy metals increases the risk of neurological disorders, and that the concentration of Florazine used at the facility is sufficient to impede the breakdown of these metals.
The argument contains two distinct conceptual gaps. First, it introduces 'neurological disorders' in the conclusion without logically linking it to the 'heavy metals' mentioned in the premises. Second, it assumes that a chemical's behavior in a laboratory setting will translate exactly to the operational reality of the new facility. The correct choices explicitly bridge these two specific gaps; without them, the causal chain from utilizing Florazine to experiencing a rise in neurological disorders is broken.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument to separate premises from the conclusion.
Premises: Florazine neutralizes beneficial microbes that break down heavy metals. Conclusion: Using Florazine will lead to a rise in neurological disorders.
Identifying the structural components is required to spot conceptual gaps.
2
Identify rogue elements and conceptual leaps.
The concept of 'neurological disorders' appears only in the conclusion. There is also a leap from Florazine's effects 'in laboratory settings' to its effects at the actual 'water treatment facility'.
Supporter assumptions are strictly necessary to connect new conclusion concepts back to the premises.
3
Evaluate the options using the Negation Test.
Negating the statement about heavy metals causing disorders destroys the conclusion. Negating the statement about Florazine concentrations at the facility being sufficient also destroys the conclusion.
The Negation Test confirms whether an assumption is strictly logically required.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Soru 3Soru →

Zoologist: In colonies of the red-crested macaque, individuals that regularly share food with non-kin spend significantly less time engaging in social grooming. Social grooming is the primary behavior through which macaques establish and maintain their position in the colony's hierarchy. Therefore, by regularly sharing food with non-kin, these macaques are actively diminishing their social standing.

Which of the following statements function as a valid supporter assumption required to bridge the logical gap in the zoologist's argument? (Select all that apply)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Any red-crested macaque that spends significantly less time on the primary behavior for maintaining its hierarchical position will experience a decrease in its social standing.; If a red-crested macaque does not experience a diminishment in its social standing, then it has not significantly reduced the amount of time it spends on social grooming.

Cevap

The correct statements are the one that directly connects spending less time on hierarchy maintenance to decreased social standing, and its contrapositive which states that a macaque not experiencing diminished standing has not reduced its grooming time.
The zoologist's argument contains a clear gap. The premises establish that food-sharing macaques groom less, and that grooming is the primary way to maintain hierarchy. However, the conclusion abruptly jumps to claiming they are 'actively diminishing their social standing.' To make this conclusion logical, we must assume that failing to engage in the primary hierarchy-maintaining behavior actually results in diminished standing. One correct statement provides this exact conditional link. The other correct statement provides the exact same logical link, just phrased as a contrapositive (if standing is not diminished, grooming was not reduced). Both properly bridge the gap.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premises of the argument.
Premise 1: Sharing food = Less time grooming. Premise 2: Grooming = Primary behavior to maintain hierarchy.
Understanding the established facts is the first step in structural argument analysis.
2
Identify the main conclusion.
Conclusion: Sharing food = Diminishing social standing.
Isolating the conclusion highlights the final claim the author is trying to prove.
3
Locate the logical gap (new concept in the conclusion).
The concept of 'diminishing social standing' appears in the conclusion but is never directly linked to 'less time grooming' in the premises.
A supporter assumption must explicitly connect the 'rogue' element in the conclusion to the established premise framework.
4
Formulate the required bridge and evaluate the options.
The required bridge is 'Less time grooming -> Diminishing social standing'. Two options provide this relationship: one directly, and one as a logically equivalent contrapositive.
Supporter assumptions can appear in standard conditional form or as their contrapositive; both successfully validate the inference.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging a logical gap requires identifying a new element in the conclusion and strictly linking it to the premise terminology, either directly or via its contrapositive.
Soru 4Soru →

Match each logical argument with the required bridging (supporter) assumption that logically connects its premise to its conclusion.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

An unsigned manuscript features rare harmonic structures exclusively utilized by Vivaldi's inner circle. Therefore, the manuscript was definitely composed between 1710 and 1720.
Oakhaven has recently shifted its primary economic focus from exporting raw minerals to exporting manufactured electronics. Thus, the country's national trade deficit will undoubtedly decrease this year.
The isolated island community of Kaelen has experienced zero immigration from the mainland for over two centuries. Consequently, the Kaelen dialect contains no vocabulary adopted from modern continental languages.
The municipal water supply has been treated with a new ultraviolet purification system that eliminates 99 percent of waterborne bacteria. Therefore, the incidence of waterborne viral infections in the city will drop significantly.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Each argument must be matched with the assumption that connects the unique subject matter in its premise to the new, distinct concept introduced in its conclusion.
Each correct pairing successfully identifies the 'Supporter' assumption. This is the unstated premise that connects a new, 'rogue' concept in the conclusion to the established concepts in the premises. The correct statements abstractly supply the necessary link without which the conclusion of the corresponding argument would be logically invalid. Furthermore, applying the Negation Test to each correct assumption immediately destroys the corresponding argument.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the premise and conclusion of each argument to identify the 'rogue' elements.
In the linguistics argument, the premise discusses 'zero immigration', while the conclusion introduces a new concept: 'no vocabulary adopted'.
A supporter assumption must explicitly connect the new conclusion element back to the existing premise elements.
2
Pre-phrase the missing conceptual link for each argument before looking at the choices.
The musicology argument requires a link between 'rare harmonic structures' and the dates '1710 and 1720'. The health argument requires a link between 'bacteria' and 'viral infections'.
Formulating the logical bridge mentally prevents being tricked by out-of-scope distractors.
3
Evaluate the assumption statements to find the abstract expressions that match your pre-phrased links.
The statement about 'physical relocation' linking to 'linguistic borrowing' bridges the linguistics argument. The statement linking 'finished goods' to the 'balance of imports and exports' bridges the economics argument.
Correct answers in LSAT questions often use abstract, synonymous language rather than repeating the exact keywords from the stimulus.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 5Soru →

Ethicist: A moral theory is practically viable only if it can be consistently applied by ordinary individuals in their daily lives. Because Utilitarianism requires a level of cognitive effort that far exceeds the psychological capacity of average humans, it is impossible for ordinary individuals to consistently apply it. Consequently, Utilitarianism cannot serve as the foundational moral framework for a functioning society.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the ethicist's argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: In order to serve as the foundational moral framework for a functioning society, a moral theory must be practically viable.

Cevap

The statement asserting that a moral theory must be practically viable in order to serve as the foundational framework for a functioning society.
The ethicist's argument traces a path from the cognitive demands of Utilitarianism to the conclusion that it is not practically viable. However, the final conclusion introduces an entirely new claim: that Utilitarianism cannot be the 'foundational moral framework for a functioning society.' Because this concept appears nowhere in the premises, there is a logical gap. The author must be assuming that lacking practical viability automatically disqualifies a theory from being a foundational framework. The correct answer explicitly provides this exact link by stating that practical viability is a necessary prerequisite for serving as a foundational framework.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the logical structure of the premises.
Premise 1 establishes: Viable → Consistently Applied. Premise 2 establishes: Utilitarianism → Exceeds Capacity → NOT Consistently Applied.
Deconstructing the text into formal logic reveals the exact endpoints of the evidence provided.
2
Determine the intermediate inference supported by the premises.
Since Utilitarianism cannot be consistently applied (denying the necessary condition for viability in Premise 1), it can be inferred that Utilitarianism is NOT practically viable.
Applying the contrapositive of Premise 1 (NOT Consistently Applied → NOT Viable) to Utilitarianism completes the premise chain.
3
Identify the main conclusion and isolate the rogue element.
The conclusion claims Utilitarianism cannot serve as a 'foundational moral framework for a functioning society.' This introduces a completely new concept not mentioned in the premises.
Finding terms in the conclusion that do not appear in the premises pinpoints the exact location of the logical gap.
4
Formulate the required bridging assumption (Supporter).
The assumption must connect the intermediate inference (NOT practically viable) to the conclusion (NOT a foundational framework). Thus: If a theory is NOT practically viable, it is NOT a foundational framework (or, contrapositively, Foundational Framework → Practically Viable).
A Supporter Assumption must syntactically link the established evidence to the unsupported new element in the conclusion.
5
Apply the Negation Test to verify the correct option.
Negating the correct option yields: 'A moral theory does NOT need to be practically viable to serve as a foundational framework.' If true, the fact that Utilitarianism is not viable no longer prevents it from being a framework, destroying the conclusion.
The Negation Test definitively proves whether an assumption is logically necessary for the argument to survive.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions in Formal Logic Chains
Soru 6Soru →

Match each logical reasoning stimulus with the necessary supporter assumption required to logically bridge the conceptual gap between its premises and its conclusion.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

A scientific theory is robust only if it withstands relentless falsification attempts. Any theory that relies on untestable metaphysical postulates inherently evades such attempts. Thus, the String Landscape model cannot be considered robust.
In civil litigation, punitive damages are warranted if and only if the defendant's conduct demonstrates malicious intent. Negligence arises from a failure of care rather than a desire to cause harm. Therefore, corporations responsible for large-scale environmental disasters should rarely be subjected to punitive damages.
An architectural design achieves timelessness strictly when it successfully harmonizes with its surrounding natural topography. Post-modernist structures deliberately impose stark geometric contrasts against their environments. Consequently, no purely post-modernist civic center will ever be universally admired by future generations.
To consolidate a short-term memory into long-term storage, the hippocampus must undergo uninterrupted protein synthesis during early deep sleep. Pharmaceutical interventions that aggressively suppress cortisol release invariably disrupt this specific sleep phase. Thus, patients taking the anti-anxiety drug 'CortiBlock' will likely experience severe deficits in forming new long-term memories.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Each stimulus contains a logical gap between established premise frameworks and a 'rogue' element introduced only in the conclusion. The correct matches provide the exact missing linkages required to make the conclusions logically valid.
Each correct pairing successfully identifies the new, unsupported concept introduced in the conclusion of the stimulus and formally links it back to the conditions established in the premises, satisfying the strict requirements of a Supporter Assumption.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the scientific theory stimulus for rogue elements.
Premises link 'untestable metaphysical postulates' to 'not robust'. Conclusion links 'String Landscape model' to 'not robust'.
Identifying the gap reveals that the String Landscape model must be connected to untestable metaphysical postulates.
2
Analyze the civil litigation stimulus for missing logical connections.
Premises link 'punitive damages' to 'malicious intent'. Conclusion asserts 'corporate environmental disasters' rarely warrant punitive damages.
To justify the conclusion, corporate environmental disasters must be classified as lacking malicious intent (i.e., driven by a failure of care).
3
Analyze the architectural design stimulus's conditional chains.
Premises prove post-modernist structures are not timeless. Conclusion claims they won't be universally admired.
The unstated assumption must bridge 'not timeless' to 'not universally admired'. The contrapositive statement matches this perfectly.
4
Analyze the neurobiology stimulus to connect the specific intervention to the general mechanism.
Premises establish that suppressing cortisol prevents memory consolidation. Conclusion claims CortiBlock prevents memory consolidation.
The argument assumes CortiBlock functions by aggressively suppressing cortisol.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Soru 7Soru →

Paleontologist: Confidently establishing the basal metabolic rate of any extinct dinosaur species requires researchers to analyze the isotopic composition of its fossilized tooth enamel. The recently excavated skeletal remains of the Tectodon, however, were unearthed exclusively from the remnants of highly acidic ancient peat bogs. Consequently, despite having complete skeletons, researchers will be unable to confidently establish the basal metabolic rate of the Tectodon.

The paleontologist's argument depends on assuming which one of the following?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Fossilized tooth enamel recovered from highly acidic ancient peat bogs does not retain an analyzable isotopic composition.

Cevap

The correct answer is the statement that fossilized tooth enamel recovered from highly acidic ancient peat bogs does not retain an analyzable isotopic composition.
The argument exhibits a clear logical gap: it jumps from the fact that the fossils were found in highly acidic peat bogs to the conclusion that researchers cannot analyze the isotopic composition of their tooth enamel. To make this leap, the paleontologist must assume that the acidic environment of the bogs somehow prevents or ruins this specific isotopic analysis. This option explicitly bridges that gap. Applying the Negation Test confirms this: if tooth enamel from highly acidic bogs DOES retain an analyzable isotopic composition, then the sole reason given for being unable to determine the Tectodon's metabolic rate vanishes, causing the argument's logic to collapse.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion of the argument.
Researchers will be unable to confidently establish the basal metabolic rate of the Tectodon.
This is the final claim the paleontologist is trying to prove, signaled by the word 'Consequently'.
2
Identify the premises supporting this conclusion.
Premise 1: Establishing metabolic rate requires analyzing the isotopic composition of tooth enamel. Premise 2: Tectodon fossils were found exclusively in highly acidic ancient peat bogs.
These statements provide the factual foundation and constraints for the argument.
3
Locate the conceptual gap between the premises and the conclusion.
The premises introduce 'highly acidic ancient peat bogs', but the conclusion depends on the inability to 'analyze the isotopic composition of its fossilized tooth enamel'. The argument assumes these specific bogs prevent this specific analysis.
A valid supporter assumption must explicitly connect the new or rogue elements in the premises to those in the conclusion.
4
Apply the Negation Test to the potential correct option to verify it is logically necessary.
If fossils from highly acidic ancient peat bogs DO retain analyzable isotopic compositions, the paleontologist's conclusion that researchers will be 'unable' to establish the metabolic rate falls apart.
A necessary assumption is one that, if proven false, destroys the logical validity of the argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Conceptual Gaps (Supporter Assumptions) and the Negation Test
Soru 8Soru →

Urban Historian: The city's waterfront warehouse district features a distinctive cast-iron architectural style that is no longer utilized in modern construction. Because it employs this obsolete style, the district serves as a tangible link to our region's industrial heritage. Therefore, the city council is obligated to pass legislation protecting the warehouse district from demolition.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the urban historian's argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The city council is obligated to pass protective legislation for any district that serves as a tangible link to the region's industrial heritage.

Cevap

The city council is obligated to pass protective legislation for any district that serves as a tangible link to the region's industrial heritage.
The argument's conclusion introduces a normative obligation ('obligated to pass legislation protecting') that does not appear anywhere in the premises. The premises only establish that the district 'serves as a tangible link to our region's industrial heritage.' To logically reach the conclusion, there must be a rule connecting this stated premise to the new normative obligation. The correct answer bridges this exact gap by stating that serving as a tangible link triggers the council's obligation to protect the district. If this statement is negated, the argument falls apart completely.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is: 'The city council is obligated to pass legislation protecting the warehouse district from demolition.'
Locating the conclusion isolates the specific claim that the premises must support.
2
Identify the premises supporting the conclusion.
Premise 1: The district has an obsolete cast-iron style. Premise 2: Because of this obsolete style, the district serves as a tangible link to industrial heritage.
Understanding the evidence shows exactly what information is available to prove the conclusion.
3
Locate the conceptual gap ('rogue element') between the premises and the conclusion.
The concept of being 'obligated to pass legislation protecting' appears only in the conclusion. The premises only establish that the district is a 'tangible link to industrial heritage.'
A valid logical argument cannot introduce entirely new concepts in the conclusion without a premise linking them to the evidence.
4
Formulate the necessary supporter assumption to bridge the gap.
If something serves as a tangible link to the region's industrial heritage, then the city council is obligated to pass legislation protecting it.
This conditional statement connects the end of the premise chain directly to the new claim in the conclusion, making the argument logically sound.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 9Soru →

Agronomist: The newly developed "Crimson" tomato cultivar has a significantly thicker skin than traditional heirloom varieties. Because of its thicker skin, the Crimson cultivar is far less susceptible to puncturing by standard agricultural harvesting machinery. Therefore, adopting the Crimson cultivar will lead to a more visually appealing crop at the local markets.

The agronomist's argument depends on which one of the following assumptions?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Puncturing by standard agricultural harvesting machinery diminishes the visual appeal of tomatoes.

Cevap

The correct assumption is that puncturing by standard agricultural harvesting machinery diminishes the visual appeal of tomatoes.
The correct answer identifies the unstated, necessary link between the premises and the conclusion. The premises establish that the Crimson cultivar is less likely to be punctured by machinery. The conclusion leaps to the claim that the Crimson cultivar will be more visually appealing. For the argument to be logically sound, there must be a connection between avoiding machinery punctures and possessing visual appeal. If puncturing does not negatively affect a tomato's visual appeal (applying the Negation Test), the conclusion entirely falls apart.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is: 'Adopting the Crimson cultivar will lead to a more visually appealing crop at the local markets.'
Finding the conclusion establishes the endpoint of the argument's logic.
2
Identify the premises provided to support this conclusion.
The premises are: 'Crimson has thicker skin' and 'Crimson is far less susceptible to puncturing by standard agricultural harvesting machinery.'
Understanding the evidence shows what foundation the author is building upon.
3
Identify the conceptual gap between the premises and the conclusion.
The premises discuss 'puncturing by machinery', but the conclusion introduces a new, 'rogue' concept: 'visually appealing crop'.
Recognizing a new term in the conclusion is the key to identifying a missing Supporter Assumption.
4
Formulate the missing link (the Supporter Assumption).
The argument must assume that there is a connection between machinery punctures and visual appeal, specifically that such punctures negatively affect visual appeal.
Without this link, the fact that the tomatoes avoid being punctured is irrelevant to how visually appealing they are.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying necessary Supporter Assumptions that bridge rogue concepts in the conclusion back to the premises.
Soru 10Soru →

Botanist: The rare *Silene* flower requires extended periods of freezing temperatures followed immediately by heavy rainfall in order to bloom. The university's climate-controlled greenhouse is incapable of simulating heavy rainfall and cannot reach freezing temperatures. Therefore, if our research team is to successfully observe the *Silene* flower's blooming phase, we will be forced to conduct our research in the Torngat Mountains, and we will need to drastically reduce our laboratory budget.

Which of the following statements function as supporter assumptions that are logically required for the botanist's conclusion to be properly drawn? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The Torngat Mountains are the only location available to the research team where the *Silene* flower can be exposed to the specific sequence of freezing temperatures and heavy rainfall.; Conducting field research in the Torngat Mountains entails costs that cannot be accommodated without drastically reducing the research team's laboratory budget.

Cevap

The statements that link the required weather conditions exclusively to the Torngat Mountains, and link the Torngat Mountains expedition to the necessary reduction of the laboratory budget.
The argument's conclusion introduces two entirely new elements that do not appear in the premises: a specific geographic location (the Torngat Mountains) and a financial consequence (drastically reducing the laboratory budget). For the conclusion to be logically drawn, two supporter assumptions are required. First, there must be a bridge connecting the required weather conditions to the Torngat Mountains (they must be the only available place with these conditions, otherwise the team isn't 'forced' to go there). Second, there must be a bridge connecting the expedition to the financial consequence (the trip must cause the budget reduction, otherwise the reduction isn't strictly necessary).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core premises of the argument.
Premise 1: Blooming requires freezing + heavy rain. Premise 2: The greenhouse cannot provide freezing or heavy rain.
Understanding the established facts is necessary before identifying what is missing.
2
Identify the main conclusion.
Conclusion: To observe the bloom, the team MUST go to the Torngat Mountains AND MUST drastically reduce the laboratory budget.
The conclusion contains the 'rogue' elements that the supporter assumptions must bridge.
3
Locate the logical gaps between the premises and the conclusion.
Gap 1: Moving from 'need specific weather' to 'must go to Torngat Mountains'. Gap 2: Moving from 'going to Torngat Mountains' to 'must reduce laboratory budget'.
Supporter assumptions function by explicitly connecting new conclusion concepts back to the established premise framework.
4
Apply the Negation Test to potential assumptions to verify they are strictly required.
Negating Gap 1 ('Torngat is NOT the only available location') destroys the claim that they are forced to go there. Negating Gap 2 ('The trip does NOT require reducing the budget') destroys the claim that they must reduce the budget.
The Negation Test definitively separates logically required assumptions from statements that merely strengthen the argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions in Compound Conclusions
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 11Soru →

Match each argument (stimulus) with the supporter assumption that is necessary to bridge the logical gap between its premise and its conclusion.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

The proposed community center will feature state-of-the-art recreational facilities. Therefore, the proposed community center will improve the overall health of the neighborhood.
The author's latest book employs a highly unconventional narrative structure. Thus, the author's latest book will be praised by literary critics.
The new manufacturing process reduces the use of synthetic chemicals by half. Consequently, the new manufacturing process is better for the local environment.
The company's customer service hotline is now available 24 hours a day. As a result, the company's customer retention rate will significantly increase.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Pair the community center argument with the health assumption, the author's book argument with the literary critics assumption, the manufacturing process argument with the environment assumption, and the hotline argument with the retention assumption.
In each case, the correct assumption functions as a required bridge that connects the new 'rogue' term in the conclusion back to the evidence provided in the premise. Without these bridges, the conclusions remain completely unsupported.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premise and the conclusion in each argument.
Each argument contains a premise (evidence) and a conclusion that introduces a new, unstated concept known as the 'rogue' element.
Finding the new concept in the conclusion is the first step in identifying a missing supporter assumption.
2
Determine the exact logical gap for each argument.
The gaps are: recreational facilities to health, unconventional structure to critic praise, fewer synthetic chemicals to better environment, and 24-hour hotline to higher retention.
A supporter assumption must explicitly connect the evidence in the premise to the new claim in the conclusion.
3
Select the assumption that links the premise concept directly to the conclusion concept.
The matching assumptions form direct 'If Premise, then Conclusion' bridges.
This completes the logical structure, validating each argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Soru 12Soru →

Mayor: The proposed community center will feature a large community garden. Community gardens require participants to work collaboratively on shared plots of land. Therefore, building the new community center will foster stronger neighborhood bonds.

The conclusion drawn by the mayor depends on which one of the following assumptions?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Working collaboratively on shared plots of land fosters stronger neighborhood bonds.

Cevap

The assumption that working collaboratively on shared plots of land fosters stronger neighborhood bonds.
The argument concludes that the new community center will foster stronger neighborhood bonds based entirely on the premise that the center's garden requires participants to work collaboratively on shared plots of land. For this conclusion to be valid, there must be a logical link between the premise (working collaboratively) and the conclusion (stronger neighborhood bonds). The correct choice explicitly provides this necessary bridge, ensuring the premises properly support the conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion of the argument.
Building the new community center will foster stronger neighborhood bonds.
Locating the main conclusion is the first step to finding a logical gap in an argument.
2
Identify the premises supporting the conclusion.
The center will feature a garden, and community gardens require working collaboratively on shared plots.
Understanding the evidence helps isolate what concepts are already logically established.
3
Find the rogue element in the conclusion that is not mentioned in the premises.
The concept of 'fostering stronger neighborhood bonds' appears only in the conclusion.
A supporter assumption must bridge the gap between the established premises and the entirely new concept introduced in the conclusion.
4
Formulate the missing link to bridge the gap.
Connect 'working collaboratively on shared plots' to 'fostering stronger neighborhood bonds'.
This bridge justifies the jump from the provided premises to the final conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Soru 13Soru →

City Councilmember: The upcoming renovation of the historic downtown theater will utilize only locally sourced building materials. Therefore, the theater renovation will significantly boost the region's economy.

Which of the following statements function as valid supporter assumptions required to bridge the logical gap between the premise and the conclusion? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Utilizing only locally sourced building materials guarantees a significant boost to a region's economy.; An initiative that does not significantly boost the region's economy does not utilize exclusively locally sourced building materials.

Cevap

The correct statements are the one affirming that utilizing local materials guarantees an economic boost, and its logical contrapositive, which states that failing to boost the economy means exclusive local materials were not used.
To prove the conclusion that the renovation will boost the economy based solely on the fact that it uses local materials, one must assume that using local materials guarantees an economic boost. One correct option states this directly. The other correct option states the exact same logical rule in contrapositive form: if the economy wasn't boosted, local materials weren't exclusively used.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premise and conclusion.
Premise: The renovation will use only locally sourced building materials. Conclusion: The renovation will significantly boost the economy.
Separating the core components of the argument is necessary to spot the logical jump.
2
Identify the rogue elements (the logical gap).
The premise introduces 'locally sourced building materials', but the conclusion introduces a new concept: 'significantly boost the region's economy'.
A supporter assumption must explicitly connect the new concept in the conclusion back to the evidence in the premise.
3
Formulate the missing link and evaluate the options.
The necessary link is 'locally sourced materials -> boosts economy'. We must find options that match this logic directly or via a valid contrapositive ('not boosted -> not locally sourced').
Multiple phrasing variations can express the exact same logical relationship required to validate the argument.

Anahtar Kavram

In a gap-bridging (supporter) assumption question, the correct answer explicitly connects a 'rogue' element in the conclusion to an element established in the premises. This link can be expressed as a direct conditional statement or its logical contrapositive.
Soru 14Soru →

Match each argument (stimulus) with the supporter assumption that is logically necessary to bridge the gap between its premises and its conclusion.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

If a legal code prioritizes restorative justice over punitive measures, it requires a robust network of community mediators. The nation of Oakhaven lacks the funding necessary to train or employ community mediators. Therefore, Oakhaven's legal code will inevitably fail to lower the national recidivism rate.
A dietary supplement can only be marketed as "performance-enhancing" if clinical trials demonstrate a significant increase in muscular endurance without elevating resting heart rate. The novel compound XT-4 increases endurance by 15%, but trials show it elevates the resting heart rate of users. Thus, XT-4 cannot be patented.
In the genre of abstract expressionism, a painting's artistic merit is determined exclusively by the emotional resonance of its chaotic forms. Sorel's latest canvas exhibits immaculate brushwork but fails to evoke any visceral reaction from its audience. Clearly, Sorel's canvas will not be inducted into the modern art museum's permanent collection.
Societal stability requires a populace that explicitly trusts its governing institutions. Frequent political scandals predictably erode this trust by portraying leaders as self-serving. Since the current administration has been plagued by continuous scandals, the national economy is destined to enter a severe recession.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Connect each argument to the assumption that explicitly links the orphaned concept in the conclusion back to the logical chain established in the premises.
Each correct pairing successfully identifies the unstated premise required to make the argument's conclusion logically follow. In supporter assumption questions, the conclusion always introduces a new concept that did not appear in the premises. The correct assumption must explicitly link this new conclusion concept to the concepts established in the premises, effectively 'closing the gap' in the author's reasoning.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Isolate the conclusion and the premises for each argument.
Identified the final claim and the supporting evidence for all four stimuli.
Structural breakdown is required to spot the exact point where the argument skips a logical step.
2
Identify the 'rogue' or 'orphaned' term in each conclusion.
Found 'fail to lower recidivism' (Argument 1), 'cannot be patented' (Argument 2), 'inducted into permanent collection' (Argument 3), and 'severe recession' (Argument 4).
A valid supporter assumption must mention the new concept introduced in the conclusion.
3
Identify the final proven point in each premise chain.
Found 'cannot prioritize restorative justice' (1), 'cannot be marketed as performance-enhancing' (2), 'lacks artistic merit' (3), and 'loss of societal stability' (4).
The assumption must connect the rogue conclusion term specifically to the end of the premise chain.
4
Match the argument to the assumption that correctly links the two elements using proper conditional or causal direction.
Successfully paired all four arguments with their corresponding linking assumptions.
Verifying the conditional direction (e.g., ensuring a necessary condition is mapped correctly) confirms the assumption validates the argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Soru 15Soru →

Match each stimulus argument (Left) with the necessary supporter assumption (Right) required to logically bridge the gap between its premise and its conclusion. Note that all arguments relate to the fictional ecology of Vespera Valley, requiring careful attention to the specific logical structure of each rather than shared vocabulary.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Since the predatory Kestrel was introduced to Vespera Valley, the native Silver Vole population has plummeted. Therefore, the Silver Vole must lack the natural camouflage required to evade avian predators.
The invasive Crimson Vine in Vespera Valley aggressively outcompetes native understory plants for sunlight and soil nutrients. Consequently, the valley is currently experiencing a severe collapse in overall ecological biodiversity.
If the Vespera Valley council restricts human access to the eastern trails, the breeding grounds of the Azure Warbler will remain undisturbed. Therefore, restricting human access to those trails will protect the Azure Warbler from imminent extinction.
A recent survey of Vespera Valley reveals that the percentage of oak trees exhibiting leaf-blight is much higher in the northern quadrant than in the southern quadrant. Clearly, the northern quadrant has experienced higher volumes of acidic rainfall.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct pairings match each stimulus to the assumption that connects its unique premise to its unique conclusion. The Kestrel argument pairs with the camouflage assumption; the Crimson Vine argument pairs with the biodiversity assumption; the Azure Warbler argument pairs with the extinction assumption; and the oak tree argument pairs with the acidic rainfall assumption.
Each correct pair represents a classic Supporter Assumption relationship. In each stimulus, the author introduces a completely new concept in the conclusion (camouflage, biodiversity collapse, imminent extinction, acidic rainfall) that was not established by the premises. A valid Supporter Assumption must act as a missing premise, explicitly linking the evidence provided to the new concept introduced in the conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Isolate the conclusion of the first argument and identify any 'rogue' elements—concepts that appear in the conclusion but were never mentioned in the premises.
In the Kestrel argument, 'lack the natural camouflage' is the rogue element.
A Supporter Assumption must explicitly bridge the gap between the new information in the conclusion and the established facts in the premises.
2
Scan the available assumptions for a statement that explicitly links the premise to the rogue conclusion element.
The assumption regarding a plummeting prey population lacking 'natural camouflage' perfectly bridges the gap for the Kestrel argument.
This establishes the necessary conditional relationship to make the conclusion logically valid.
3
Repeat this process for the remaining arguments, ignoring shared domain vocabulary (like 'Vespera Valley') and focusing strictly on the logical leaps.
The 'collapse in ecological biodiversity' links to 'displacement of understory plants'; 'protection from extinction' links to 'undisturbed breeding grounds'; and 'acidic rainfall' links to 'leaf-blight'.
In complex matching scenarios where all items share a theme, structural mapping prevents falling for semantic distractors.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Soru 16Soru →

Legal Theorist: A judicial system is truly equitable only if its appellate courts consistently overturn convictions that are based on coerced confessions. In the nation of Veridia, appellate judges strictly adhere to a doctrine prioritizing the finality of judgments, a doctrine that absolutely precludes them from re-evaluating the credibility of any witness testimonies established during the original trial. Consequently, despite its otherwise robust constitutional protections, Veridia’s judicial system fails to meet the standard of true equity.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the legal theorist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: An appellate court cannot consistently overturn convictions based on coerced confessions without re-evaluating the credibility of witness testimonies established during the original trial.

Cevap

The correct answer states that an appellate court cannot consistently overturn convictions based on coerced confessions without re-evaluating the credibility of witness testimonies established during the original trial.
The argument concludes that Veridia is not equitable because its doctrine prevents appellate courts from re-evaluating witness credibility. However, the explicit requirement for equity provided in the first premise is the ability to consistently overturn coerced confessions. To draw the conclusion, the argument must assume a structural link between these two distinct concepts. The correct answer provides this bridge by stating that re-evaluating witness credibility is a necessary prerequisite for overturning coerced confessions. If this were not true (meaning courts could overturn coerced confessions without re-evaluating witnesses), Veridia's doctrine would not inherently prevent it from being equitable, and the argument would collapse.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main conclusion.
The conclusion is: Veridia's judicial system fails to meet the standard of true equity.
Identifying the conclusion establishes the endpoint of the logical chain.
2
Identify the stated requirements for the conclusion.
Premise 1 states: A system is equitable ONLY IF it consistently overturns convictions based on coerced confessions (Equitable -> Overturn Coerced).
This establishes the conditional framework required to prove a system is not equitable (i.e., failing to overturn coerced confessions).
3
Analyze the specific evidence provided about the subject (Veridia).
Premise 2 states: Veridia's courts are precluded from re-evaluating the credibility of witness testimonies.
This identifies the disconnected 'rogue' element in the premises that must be logically linked to the requirement found in Step 2.
4
Bridge the logical gap between the evidence and the requirement.
To conclude that Veridia fails the equity test, its inability to re-evaluate witness credibility must inherently prevent it from overturning coerced confessions.
Without this unstated bridge, Veridia's specific procedural limitation would have no logical bearing on its ability to meet the condition for true equity.
5
Apply the Negation Test to verify necessity.
Negating the correct answer yields: 'An appellate court CAN overturn coerced confessions WITHOUT re-evaluating witness testimonies.' If this were true, Veridia could still satisfy the requirement for equity, destroying the conclusion.
The Negation Test is the definitive proof that an assumption is logically required by the argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Soru 17Soru →

Review the four abbreviated logical arguments below. Each argument contains a flawed inference due to a missing conceptual link between its stated premise and its conclusion. Pair each argument with the specific unstated supporter assumption required to logically bridge that gap.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Archaeology: The ceramic vessels recovered from the Oakhaven excavation contain concentrated traces of fermented maize. Therefore, the inhabitants of this ancient settlement must have operated within a highly stratified social hierarchy.
Economics: The central bank’s newly adopted macroeconomic strategy prioritizes inflation suppression over achieving full employment. Consequently, this strategy will inevitably diminish the collective bargaining power of domestic labor unions.
Science: The theoretical model developed by the research team relies exclusively on non-linear stochastic equations. Therefore, the team's framework cannot possibly generate deterministic long-term forecasts.
Policy: The revised municipal zoning ordinance explicitly mandates high-density residential architecture in the downtown sector. As a result, the fundamental historical character of that sector will be irreversibly compromised.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Archaeology pairs with the assumption about fermented maize being exclusive to stratified societies. Economics pairs with the assumption that failing to prioritize full employment undermines bargaining power. Science pairs with the contrapositive assumption regarding deterministic forecasts and mathematical elements. Policy pairs with the assumption linking high-density architecture to irreversibly compromised historical character.
Each correct pairing provides the exact logical link missing from the abbreviated argument. A valid supporter assumption must take the distinct evidence offered in the premise and connect it explicitly to the novel term introduced in the conclusion, often using conditional logic (e.g., 'If [Premise Concept], then [Conclusion Concept]').

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze each argument to isolate the premise and identify the 'rogue element' introduced in the conclusion.
Identified rogue elements: 'highly stratified social hierarchy' (Archaeology), 'diminish collective bargaining power' (Economics), 'cannot generate deterministic long-term forecasts' (Science), and 'irreversibly compromised historical character' (Policy).
Supporter assumptions must explicitly connect new or unstated concepts in the conclusion back to the evidence provided in the premises.
2
Evaluate the available assumptions to find the precise logical bridge for the Science argument, which requires recognizing a contrapositive structure.
Matched Science to the assumption stating 'Any theoretical model capable of generating... forecasts must incorporate... elements other than... stochastic equations.'
This is the contrapositive of the required direct link: If exclusively non-linear stochastic -> Cannot generate deterministic forecasts.
3
Match the remaining arguments by finding the assumptions that guarantee the rogue conclusions based on the given premises.
Completed the pairings: l1 to r3, l2 to r4, and l4 to r2.
Each selected assumption operates as a missing premise that, when added to the original argument, makes the conclusion logically valid.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Soru 18Soru →

Marine Biologist: The foundational organisms in the aphotic Midnight Trench ecosystem derive their energy exclusively from hydrogen sulfide. Surviving the extreme toxicity of this compound requires these organisms to constantly dedicate substantial energy to cellular repair, which in turn results in an exceptionally high baseline metabolic rate. Therefore, these organisms must have significantly shorter lifespans than typical photosynthetic marine organisms, and the ecosystem's broader food web must be unusually vulnerable to sudden collapse.

Which of the following statements function as necessary supporter assumptions required to bridge the logical gaps in the marine biologist's argument? (Select all that apply)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: An exceptionally high baseline metabolic rate is incompatible with a lifespan as long as that of typical photosynthetic marine organisms.; Ecosystems whose foundational organisms dedicate substantial energy to cellular repair have food webs that are unusually vulnerable to sudden collapse.

Cevap

The statements connecting the high metabolic rate to shorter lifespans, and connecting the cellular repair energy demand to food web vulnerability.
The argument contains a compound conclusion with two entirely new concepts: 'shorter lifespans' and 'vulnerable to sudden collapse'. To validate the conclusion, we must bridge the premises to these new concepts. One correct statement connects the premise of an 'exceptionally high baseline metabolic rate' to the conclusion of a 'shorter lifespan'. The other correct statement connects the premise of 'dedicating substantial energy to cellular repair' to the conclusion of a 'vulnerable food web'. Both are logically necessary for the dual conclusion to hold true.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core premises of the argument.
The foundational organisms use hydrogen sulfide, require substantial energy for cellular repair, and consequently have an exceptionally high baseline metabolic rate.
Understanding the exact evidence provided is the first step in finding the logical gaps.
2
Identify the main conclusion.
The conclusion contains two distinct claims: 1) The organisms have shorter lifespans than typical photosynthetic organisms, and 2) the food web is unusually vulnerable to collapse.
Supporter assumptions must directly link premise elements to rogue elements introduced in the conclusion.
3
Locate the logical gaps.
There is no stated connection between 'high metabolic rate' and 'shorter lifespans', nor between 'cellular repair/metabolic rate' and 'vulnerable food webs'.
In LSAT logic, you cannot introduce new concepts in the conclusion without a bridging assumption.
4
Select the assumptions that specifically bridge these gaps.
One correct option bridges high metabolic rate to shorter lifespans. The other bridges cellular repair to food web vulnerability.
Since the question asks to select all that apply, both required bridging statements must be chosen.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 19Soru →

Astrophysicist: According to leading cosmological models, a spiral galaxy can maintain its structural integrity over billions of years only if it is enveloped by a massive dark matter halo. The recently observed spiral galaxy VCC-128 has maintained its structural integrity for at least four billion years. Yet, advanced sensor arrays have confirmed that VCC-128 emits no anomalous axion radiation. Therefore, the leading cosmological models must be incorrect.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the astrophysicist's argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Any galaxy that is enveloped by a massive dark matter halo emits anomalous axion radiation.

Cevap

The correct answer is the statement that any galaxy enveloped by a massive dark matter halo emits anomalous axion radiation.
The correct answer bridges the logical gap between the evidence (no anomalous axion radiation) and the conclusion (models requiring dark matter halos are incorrect). For the absence of axion radiation to invalidate a model requiring a dark matter halo, it must be true that a dark matter halo inherently produces such radiation. If this assumption were false, VCC-128 could possess a dark matter halo despite lacking axion radiation, rendering the argument's conclusion completely unsupported.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premises.
Premise 1: Leading models require a massive dark matter halo for a spiral galaxy to maintain integrity. Premise 2: VCC-128 maintains integrity. Premise 3: VCC-128 emits no anomalous axion radiation.
Understanding the core evidence is the first step in analyzing logical gaps.
2
Identify the argument's conclusion.
Conclusion: The leading cosmological models must be incorrect.
Locating the conclusion highlights what the author is trying to prove.
3
Locate the conceptual gap between the premises and the conclusion.
The models deal with 'massive dark matter halos', but the final evidence involves 'anomalous axion radiation'. The author jumps from the absence of axion radiation to the absence of a dark matter halo (which would invalidate the models).
Supporter assumptions always link rogue elements in the premises to elements in the conclusion.
4
Formulate the required bridging assumption.
The argument must assume that having a massive dark matter halo guarantees the emission of anomalous axion radiation (Halo -> Axion).
This bridge ensures that the lack of axion radiation logically proves the lack of a dark matter halo.
5
Apply the Negation Test to confirm the assumption.
Negating the correct statement yields: 'A massive dark matter halo does NOT necessarily emit anomalous axion radiation.' If this is true, VCC-128 could have a halo without emitting axions, entirely destroying the conclusion that the models are incorrect.
The Negation Test is the definitive method for proving a necessary assumption.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Soru 20Soru →

Philosopher of Science: For a theoretical framework to be deemed scientifically mature, its core postulates must yield observable consequences that can be strictly isolated from confounding variables. The newly proposed String-Loop synthesis yields observable consequences only at energy scales present in the early universe, where isolating variables from cosmic background fluctuations is fundamentally impossible. Therefore, the String-Loop synthesis cannot be utilized as a foundational text in graduate-level physics curricula.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the philosopher of science's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No theoretical framework should be utilized as a foundational text in graduate-level physics curricula unless it is deemed scientifically mature.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that no theoretical framework should be utilized as a foundational text unless it is deemed scientifically mature.
The correct answer explicitly bridges the gap between the premise's implication (String-Loop is not scientifically mature) and the conclusion (String-Loop cannot be utilized as a foundational text). By stating 'No framework should be utilized... unless it is mature', it establishes that being scientifically mature is a necessary condition for being utilized as a foundational text. Applying the Negation Test proves this: if we negate this statement to 'A framework can be utilized as a foundational text even if it is not scientifically mature', the philosopher's conclusion completely loses its logical support.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is that the String-Loop synthesis cannot be utilized as a foundational text in graduate-level physics curricula.
This is the final claim the philosopher aims to prove, signaled by the word 'Therefore.'
2
Break down the premises supporting this conclusion.
Premise 1 states that scientific maturity requires observable consequences that can be strictly isolated. Premise 2 states that String-Loop's consequences cannot be strictly isolated (due to cosmic background fluctuations).
Understanding the stated evidence is necessary to find the logical gap.
3
Determine what can be inferred directly from the premises.
By combining Premise 1 and Premise 2 using modus tollens, we can infer that the String-Loop synthesis is not scientifically mature.
Evaluating the deductive chain helps isolate the 'rogue' elements that remain unconnected to the conclusion.
4
Identify the conceptual gap between the premises and the conclusion.
The premises establish that String-Loop is 'not scientifically mature,' but the conclusion shifts to claiming it cannot be 'utilized as a foundational text.' The argument assumes a link between these two concepts.
A supporter assumption must bridge the gap by connecting the new element in the conclusion to the established evidence in the premises.
5
Formulate the required assumption and apply the Negation Test to the options.
The argument requires the assumption that 'If a framework is not scientifically mature, it cannot be utilized as a foundational text' (or its logical equivalent). The correct option matches this perfectly.
The Negation Test is the definitive method for confirming necessary assumptions on the LSAT; negating the correct option will destroy the argument's validity.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Sayfa 1 / 2Sonraki