Analyze the following two recent developments in the agricultural sector to determine their logical connection:
Development 1: The federal agricultural board introduced a guaranteed bulk-purchase scheme at premium rates exclusively for drought-resistant coarse grains.
Development 2: The total farming area allocated to water-intensive cash crops in the semi-arid northern districts has declined by approximately thirty percent this season.
Which of the choices accurately reflects the causal dynamic between these two developments?
- Development 1 is the primary cause and Development 2 is its logical effect.Cevap
- BDevelopment 2 is the primary cause and Development 1 is its logical effect.
- CBoth developments are independent causes triggered by unrelated factors.
- DBoth developments are independent effects of separate, unrelated causes.
- EBoth developments are effects stemming from a single common cause.
Cevap
Development 1 is the primary cause and Development 2 is its logical effect.
The correct response accurately maps the economic principle of substitution. When a government agency introduces a highly favorable financial scheme for a specific type of crop (Development 1), it logically drives farmers to dedicate more land to that crop. Given finite farming land, this directly causes a reduction in the acreage of competing, less incentivized crops (Development 2).
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Cause and Effect Reasoning