Soru

Zorluk: OrtaInference and Logical Deduction

Read the following passage carefully:

Under the 2026 Agro-Ecological Resilience Framework, state agricultural boards are mandated to restrict chemical fertilizer subsidies for farms operating within designated vulnerable watershed zones. However, farms that transition at least 40% of their land area to zero-budget natural farming practices within two years remain eligible for transition grants, provided they do not expand their irrigated perimeter beyond 2024 baselines. Furthermore, participating farms that achieve certified soil organic carbon levels above 1.5% receive priority access to municipal micro-irrigation infrastructure funding, regardless of their total landholding size. The policy explicitly excludes commercial monoculture plantations from receiving any form of transition grants or priority infrastructure access.

Based on the passage above, which of the following statements can be logically inferred?

  1. A commercial monoculture plantation that transitions 50% of its land to zero-budget natural farming will remain ineligible for transition grants.Cevap
  2. A farm in a vulnerable watershed zone that expands its irrigated perimeter beyond 2024 baselines loses eligibility for transition grants even if it achieves the 40% natural farming threshold within two years.Cevap
  3. C
    Farms located outside designated vulnerable watershed zones are completely prohibited from applying for municipal micro-irrigation infrastructure funding.
  4. D
    Achieving a certified soil organic carbon level above 1.5% is mandatory for all farms in vulnerable watershed zones to retain chemical fertilizer subsidies.

Cevap

The valid inferences are that commercial monoculture plantations remain ineligible for transition grants regardless of land transition percentage, and that expanding the irrigated perimeter beyond 2024 baselines disqualifies a farm from transition grants even if it meets the natural farming area threshold.
The inference regarding commercial monoculture plantations is valid because the passage places an absolute exclusion on them for transition grants regardless of their practices. The inference regarding irrigation expansion is also valid because maintaining the 2024 baseline perimeter is a necessary condition for receiving transition grants.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditions for commercial monoculture plantations
The text states commercial monoculture plantations are explicitly excluded from all transition grants and priority infrastructure access without exception.
This establishes that any statement claiming a commercial monoculture plantation cannot receive transition grants despite meeting natural farming percentages is a valid deduction.
2
Analyze the eligibility criteria for transition grants
Grant eligibility requires BOTH transitioning at least 40% land area to natural farming within two years AND keeping the irrigated perimeter at or below 2024 baselines.
If a farm fails the irrigation perimeter condition, it loses eligibility regardless of meeting the natural farming area requirement.
3
Evaluate negative distractors regarding external conditions and subsidy rules
The passage discusses priority access for soil carbon performance and chemical subsidy restrictions in vulnerable zones, but does not state outside farms are prohibited or that 1.5% soil carbon is required to keep chemical subsidies.
Options introducing unstated prohibitions or confusing soil carbon benefits with chemical subsidy retention are logically invalid.

Anahtar Kavram

Logical Deduction from Explicit Conditional Premises
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Bu soruyu puanla