Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: KolayInference and Logical Deduction

Read the following passage carefully:

Under the 2025 State Agroforestry and Soil Conservation Framework, state subsidies are provided exclusively to smallholder farmers who adopt multi-cropping techniques along with organic composting. According to regional agricultural data, farms implementing these combined methods observed a 30 percent reduction in soil erosion within eighteen months. Furthermore, the framework mandates that any farm receiving financial assistance must submit bi-annual soil quality audits conducted by certified state agronomists. However, farms that utilize synthetic nitrogen fertilizers are strictly ineligible for government grants, even if they practice multi-cropping. The primary objective of this framework is to restore degraded topsoil while discouraging chemical runoff into nearby river basins.

Based on the passage provided above, which of the following statements can be logically inferred? (Select all that apply)

  1. Farms utilizing synthetic nitrogen fertilizers cannot receive state financial assistance under the framework.Cevap
  2. Farmers receiving state subsidies under this framework are obligated to undergo periodic soil assessments.Cevap
  3. C
    All agricultural farms throughout the state achieved a 30 percent reduction in soil erosion after eighteen months.
  4. D
    Practicing multi-cropping without organic composting provides complete immunity against chemical runoff into river basins.

Cevap

The valid inferences are that farms utilizing synthetic nitrogen fertilizers cannot receive state financial assistance under the framework, and that farmers receiving state subsidies under this framework are obligated to undergo periodic soil assessments.
The valid conclusions directly follow from explicit statements in the text: synthetic nitrogen fertilizer users are barred from government grants, and financial aid recipients must submit to bi-annual soil quality audits.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the statement regarding synthetic nitrogen fertilizers against the passage facts.
The text explicitly specifies that farms using synthetic nitrogen fertilizers are strictly ineligible for grants, making the statement logically valid.
Direct textual facts mandate this restriction regardless of multi-cropping practices.
2
Evaluate the requirement for soil assessments among subsidy recipients.
The passage mandates bi-annual soil quality audits conducted by certified state agronomists for financial assistance recipients.
Periodic soil evaluations are an explicit requirement tied directly to subsidy eligibility.
3
Assess the claim regarding state-wide soil erosion reduction.
The 30 percent reduction applies only to farms implementing combined multi-cropping and organic composting methods, not all state farms.
Overgeneralizing a specific cohort statistic to the entire state population is a logical misinterpretation.
4
Evaluate the claim concerning multi-cropping and complete immunity against chemical runoff.
The passage does not claim that multi-cropping alone eliminates runoff, making this an unsupported external assumption.
Inferences must rely solely on necessary conclusions supported directly by text facts.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Valid Inferences from Explicit Policy Text
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Inference and Logical Deduction

Bu konudan daha fazla soru