Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorInference and Logical Deduction

Passage:
While central banks in emerging economies frequently deploy macroprudential capital controls to attenuate volatile cross-border portfolio flows, empirical audits reveal an underlying structural friction. When sovereign debt instruments are denominated in domestic currency but held predominantly by offshore institutional funds, targeted caps on short-term capital inflows shift systemic risk rather than neutralize it. Constrained by domestic foreign-exchange exposure limits, domestic commercial banks frequently utilize shadow hedging mechanisms via offshore non-deliverable forward (NDF) derivative markets. This arbitrage uncouples domestic interest rate signals from domestic credit allocation, as foreign counterparties absorb currency mismatches while demanding higher sovereign risk premiums. Consequently, although macroprudential interventions succeed in dampening nominal balance-of-payments volatility in the short term, they amplify liquidity stress during sudden capital flight by transferring monetary policy transmission to offshore derivative markets beyond regulatory jurisdiction.

Statement: Based strictly on the passage provided above, it can be logically deduced that macroprudential capital controls inevitably fail to diminish nominal balance-of-payments volatility because central bank policy rates lose their efficacy over domestic credit allocation.

Is the statement True or False?

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

False
The statement is False because it directly contradicts the explicit passage finding that macroprudential capital controls succeed in dampening nominal balance-of-payments volatility in the short term. The author separates short-term surface volatility reduction from structural liquidity risks that arise during capital flight.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the core assertion made in the statement regarding nominal balance-of-payments volatility.
The statement asserts that macroprudential capital controls inevitably fail to reduce nominal balance-of-payments volatility.
Logical deduction in CSAT reading comprehension requires testing the claim against explicit premises established in the passage.
2
Locate the explicit passage premise discussing nominal balance-of-payments volatility.
The passage explicitly affirms that 'macroprudential interventions succeed in dampening nominal balance-of-payments volatility in the short term.'
Any deductive claim that directly contradicts a explicitly stated premise in the passage is logically false.
3
Evaluate the causal link proposed in the statement ('because central bank policy rates lose efficacy').
While loss of policy rate efficacy occurs due to NDF market arbitrage, its consequence is amplified liquidity stress during capital flight, not a failure to reduce surface volatility.
Conflating distinct outcomes and attributing a false cause creates an invalid logical deduction.

Anahtar Kavram

Inference and Logical Deduction
Bu soruyu puanla