Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorStatement and Arguments

Read the following policy statement and evaluate the structural strength of the arguments that follow regarding its administrative, economic, and practical viability.

Statement: Should state governments mandate that all municipal public transit authorities convert their entire bus fleets exclusively to hydrogen fuel-cell technology within the next three years?

Which of the following statements represent logically STRONG arguments regarding this policy proposal? Select all that apply.

  1. No; zero-emission transit transitions require adequate fuel production infrastructure, and forcing a complete fleet overhaul within three years without established green hydrogen supply chains risks systemic public transit disruption.Cevap
  2. B
    Yes; hydrogen is the most abundant chemical element in the universe, which proves that municipal transit departments will face zero operational fuel costs when adopting hydrogen buses.
  3. No; committing public transit budgets exclusively to hydrogen fuel-cells locks municipalities out of mature battery-electric alternatives that currently offer lower lifecycle costs and established local maintenance networks.Cevap
  4. D
    Yes; the state transport ministry should immediately impound and scrap all existing diesel buses tomorrow to force local transit managers to adopt hydrogen models.

Cevap

The arguments highlighting infrastructure supply chain risks within the short deadline and comparative lifecycle costs against established battery-electric alternatives are logically strong arguments.
The correct selections are the arguments addressing green hydrogen supply chain timelines and comparative lifecycle costs relative to battery-electric alternatives. Both arguments provide logically sound, practically relevant, and non-trivial points that directly evaluate the rigid constraints of the proposed policy.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the policy statement context and core constraints
The statement proposes a mandatory, exclusive 3-year transition of all municipal buses to hydrogen fuel-cell technology.
Establishing the precise parameters (exclusivity and strict 3-year timeline) is essential for evaluating argument relevance and feasibility.
2
Evaluate the argument regarding fuel infrastructure and supply chains
Identified as strong because it directly addresses the realistic challenge of setting up green hydrogen production and distribution facilities within a tight 3-year window.
A strong argument in policy evaluation must be realistic, directly relevant, and present sound logical consequences.
3
Evaluate the argument regarding the cosmic abundance of hydrogen
Identified as weak because elemental abundance in nature does not guarantee zero processing, compression, or municipal procurement costs.
Confusing the factual truth of a broad scientific facts with practical policy economics is a classic logical fallacy.
4
Evaluate the argument regarding opportunity cost and mature alternative technologies
Identified as strong because technology lock-in and comparative infrastructure maturity are major economic considerations in public administration.
Evaluating an exclusive technological mandate against viable existing alternatives provides a substantive logical counter-argument.
5
Evaluate the argument recommending immediate impoundment of existing fleets
Identified as weak because drastic administrative coercion does not provide a valid rationale for policy success.
Proposing extreme, disruptive administrative actions ignores operational logic and administrative ethics.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluation of Strong and Weak Arguments in Administrative Policy
Tahmini Süre:3m 0s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Statement and Arguments

Bu konudan daha fazla soru