Read the following passage carefully:
Public sector agencies evaluating the procurement of automated predictive maintenance software for municipal rail networks must balance operational efficiency against algorithmic accountability. Under current administrative guidelines, any municipal transit authority introducing machine-learning diagnostic tools is required to retain human maintenance engineers to validate automated safety alerts before taking any physical infrastructure offline. While automated software can process acoustic sensor data to detect micro-fractures in track geometry up to four times faster than manual inspections, these systems occasionally trigger false positives caused by ambient vibrations from surrounding road traffic. Consequently, full automation of maintenance decisions is prohibited, ensuring that system overrides remain under human discretion. Furthermore, transit authorities that fail to maintain certified human oversight personnel face mandatory suspension of state subsidy allocations, regardless of the software vendor's certified precision rating. Additionally, transit agencies must audit algorithmic recommendation logs quarterly to ensure diagnostic thresholds are not silently altered by vendor software updates.
Statement: An automated acoustic sensor alert indicating micro-fractures in track geometry cannot legally lead to taking physical rail infrastructure offline without prior validation from a certified human maintenance engineer.
Based strictly on the information provided in the passage, is the statement above logically true or false?
Cevap: Cevap