Question

Difficulty: Very hardEvaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content

[1] In the depths of the ocean, hydrothermal vents support unique ecosystems that thrive completely independent of sunlight. [2] Instead of relying on photosynthesis, the primary producers in these environments—specialized bacteria—utilize chemosynthesis to convert chemical energy from the vents' mineral-rich fluids into organic matter. [3] These chemosynthetic bacteria often form symbiotic relationships with larger organisms, such as giant tube worms, which lack mouths and digestive tracts. [4] Tube worms possess bright red plumes filled with hemoglobin that absorb hydrogen sulfide and oxygen from the water. [5] The bacteria reside inside a specialized organ within the tube worm called a trophosome, where they use the raw materials delivered by the worm's bloodstream to produce nutrients. [6] This elegant partnership demonstrates how life can adapt to survive in some of the most extreme conditions on Earth.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 4 from the passage. Should this sentence be kept or deleted?

  1. Kept, because it explains how the tube worms acquire the chemical compounds that the symbiotic bacteria use to generate nutrients.Answer
  2. B
    Kept, because it provides descriptive imagery that helps the reader visualize the harsh environment surrounding hydrothermal vents.
  3. C
    Deleted, because it introduces descriptive details about the tube worms' appearance that distract from the paragraph's explanation of chemosynthesis.
  4. D
    Deleted, because it repeats information about the raw materials used in chemosynthesis that was already established in Sentence 2.

Answer

The sentence should be kept because it explains how the tube worms acquire the chemical compounds that the symbiotic bacteria use to generate nutrients.
The sentence should be kept because it provides the necessary explanation of how the tube worms absorb the specific chemical compounds (hydrogen sulfide and oxygen) that are transported via their bloodstream to the symbiotic bacteria residing in the trophosome.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the function of Sentence 4 in the context of the paragraph.
Sentence 4 describes the tube worms' plumes absorbing hydrogen sulfide and oxygen from the water.
This identifies the specific substances the worms take in and mentions hemoglobin, which is involved in transport.
2
Analyze Sentence 5 to see if it relies on information from Sentence 4.
Sentence 5 refers to 'raw materials delivered by the worm's bloodstream' which the bacteria use to produce nutrients.
The 'raw materials' are the hydrogen sulfide and oxygen introduced in Sentence 4, and the 'bloodstream' transport is facilitated by the 'hemoglobin' introduced in Sentence 4.
3
Evaluate the impact of deleting Sentence 4.
Without Sentence 4, the phrase 'the raw materials delivered by the worm's bloodstream' in Sentence 5 has no logical antecedent, creating a gap in explanation.
Therefore, Sentence 4 is essential to the paragraph's explanation and must be kept.

Key Concept

Evaluating sentence relevance based on structural cohesion and the establishment of logical antecedents for subsequent sentences.
Rate this question