Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content

79 questions

Question 1Question

For centuries, writers and artists used lead rods to make marks on paper. In 1564, a massive deposit of pure graphite was discovered in Borrowdale, England. [3] Graphite is a crystalline form of the element carbon. Early pencil makers wrapped the graphite rods in string or encased them in wooden sleeves to prevent the soft material from breaking.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 3 from the paragraph. Should this sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's historical focus on the development of the pencil with an irrelevant scientific definition.

Answer

Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's historical focus on the development of the pencil with an irrelevant scientific definition.
The correct decision is to delete the sentence because the paragraph is focused on the history and structural evolution of the pencil. The chemical classification of graphite as carbon is an irrelevant digression. The option stating that it interrupts the paragraph's historical focus with an irrelevant scientific definition correctly identifies both the decision and the rhetorical reason.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the history of writing instruments, specifically the transition from lead rods to graphite pencils.
Understanding the paragraph's main theme is necessary to evaluate if Sentence 3 is relevant.
2
Analyze the content of Sentence 3 and compare it to the main focus.
Sentence 3 defines graphite chemically as a form of carbon. This is a scientific fact that does not contribute to the historical narrative of the pencil's development.
This determines whether the sentence should be kept (relevant) or deleted (irrelevant).
3
Evaluate the reasons provided in the deletion options to find the correct justification.
The option proposing deletion because it interrupts the paragraph's historical focus with an irrelevant scientific definition is the only one with both the correct decision and correct reasoning.
The other deletion option falsely claims the sentence repeats previously introduced information about carbon.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 2Question

In nineteenth-century printing shops, typesetters hand-assembled individual metal letters to form words. To save time when printing frequently used phrases, workers cast entire phrases as single, solid plates of metal. This printing plate was called a *cliché*, a word mimicking the clicking sound made during the plate-making process. Over time, the word shifted from referring to the metal plate to describing the overused, unoriginal phrases printed by it. Today, most printing presses are computerized and no longer use physical plates.

Should the writer keep or delete the underlined sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of the etymology and history of the word 'cliché'.

Answer

The correct answer is the option stating that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of the etymology and history of the word 'cliché'.
The correct answer is the option stating that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of the etymology and history of the word 'cliché'. The paragraph is specifically focused on how the word 'cliché' came to be, starting from a physical object in nineteenth-century print shops. Discussing modern computerized printing presses shifts the focus away from this historical etymology.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the nineteenth-century origins of the word 'cliché' and how its meaning shifted over time from a physical printing plate to an overused phrase.
Understanding the core topic of the paragraph is necessary to evaluate if any information is relevant or irrelevant.
2
Analyze the purpose and content of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence describes modern computerized printing presses.
This helps determine if the sentence contributes to the main focus or distracts from it.
3
Decide whether to keep or delete the sentence and select the option with the correct justification.
The sentence should be deleted because modern computerized printing is irrelevant to the etymological history of 'cliché'. The correct choice is the option that identifies this interruption of focus.
Aligning the correct decision (delete) with the accurate rhetorical reasoning yields the final answer.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 3Question

Before the late nineteenth century, timekeeping was a local affair, with each town setting its clocks by the sun. In 1883, major railroad companies in North America agreed to establish four standard time zones to prevent scheduling confusion and train collisions. Under this new system, millions of travelers and businesses could coordinate their activities across vast distances. The Canadian railway engineer Sir Sandford Fleming, who first proposed worldwide hourly standard time zones, was knighted by Queen Victoria for his achievements. By 1918, the United States Congress had officially adopted standard time, cementing standard time zones as a permanent fixture of modern life.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it shifts the focus of the paragraph from the practical coordination and adoption of standard time zones to biographical trivia about Fleming.

Answer

Deleted, because it shifts the focus of the paragraph from the practical coordination and adoption of standard time zones to biographical trivia about Fleming.
The paragraph discusses the practical coordination and official adoption of standard time zones in North America. The underlined sentence introduces biographical trivia about Sir Sandford Fleming's knighthood, which shifts the paragraph's focus away from its main topic. Therefore, the sentence should be deleted.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main topic of the paragraph.
The paragraph is about the coordination and adoption of standard time zones in North America to resolve railway scheduling issues.
Establishing the central theme of the surrounding text is necessary to determine what information is relevant.
2
Analyze the function of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence provides information about Sir Sandford Fleming proposing worldwide hourly time zones and being knighted by Queen Victoria.
Identifying the role of the sentence allows for comparing it against the paragraph's overall focus.
3
Compare the sentence's function with the paragraph's theme to make the final decision.
The sentence shifts focus to biographical trivia about Fleming, interrupting the discussion of North American implementation, so it should be deleted.
Sentences that distract from the main focus of a paragraph should be removed to maintain unity and cohesion.

Key Concept

Evaluating sentence relevance based on paragraph focus and unity.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 4Question

In the mid-twentieth century, the modern conservation movement was revolutionized by the introduction of the wilderness concept. Proponents of this philosophy argued that certain natural areas should be set aside and completely protected from human development. This marked a significant departure from earlier conservation efforts, which had focused primarily on the sustainable extraction of resources like timber and minerals. The U.S. Congress formalized this new approach by passing the Wilderness Act of 1964, which legally defined wilderness as "an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man." Some early drafts of the legislation were composed on manual typewriters in crowded congressional offices. Today, this landmark act protects over one hundred million acres of public land, ensuring that these ecosystems remain undisturbed for future generations.

The writer is considering deleting the sentence "Some early drafts of the legislation were composed on manual typewriters in crowded congressional offices" from the paragraph. Should this sentence be deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of the Wilderness Act's legislative significance with an irrelevant detail about the physical drafting of the bill.

Answer

Yes, because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of the Wilderness Act's legislative significance with an irrelevant detail about the physical drafting of the bill.
The correct choice accurately identifies that the sentence should be deleted because it introduces a minor physical detail (the use of manual typewriters in crowded offices) that interrupts the cohesive discussion of the Wilderness Act's conceptual development and long-term impact on conservation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on the shift in the conservation movement toward the wilderness concept, culminating in the Wilderness Act of 1964 and its modern impact.
Establishing the main idea of the passage is necessary to evaluate whether a specific sentence is relevant or extraneous.
2
Analyze the sentence proposed for deletion to determine its function and relevance.
The sentence describes the physical act of drafting the bill on manual typewriters. This detail does not contribute to the description of the conservation philosophy or the legal significance of the act.
Evaluating the specific content of the sentence helps determine if it adds useful support or creates a logical digression.
3
Determine whether the sentence should be kept or deleted, and select the option with the correct justification.
The sentence should be deleted because it introduces irrelevant information that breaks the paragraph's focus. The option identifying this interruption is the correct choice.
Ensures that both the decision (delete) and the rhetorical reason (interruption of the paragraph's main focus) align logically.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 5Question

[1] In 1910, French engineer Georges Claude introduced the neon lamp to the public at the Paris Motor Show, capitalizing on a byproduct of his air liquefaction business. [2] Claude had been searching for a way to utilize the abundant neon gas left over from producing pure oxygen for industrial applications. [3] He discovered that passing an electric current through the gas in a sealed glass tube produced a brilliant, luminous red light. [4] Under normal atmospheric conditions, neon is a colorless, odorless, and chemically inert monatomic gas. [5] Recognizing the advertising potential of his discovery, Claude soon sold the first commercial neon signs to a Parisian barber, launching a global industry that would permanently transform the nighttime aesthetics of modern cities.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 4 from the paragraph. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it shifts the paragraph's focus from the development and commercialization of Claude's invention to basic scientific facts about neon.

Answer

The sentence should be deleted because it shifts the paragraph's focus from the development and commercialization of Claude's invention to basic scientific facts about neon.
The correct option correctly identifies that Sentence 4 should be deleted because its focus on basic scientific facts about neon gas deviates from the paragraph's primary narrative about Georges Claude's invention and commercialization of the neon lamp.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph details the historical narrative of Georges Claude's development of the neon lamp and its commercial application as signage.
Understanding the paragraph's core purpose allows you to evaluate whether individual sentences contribute to or distract from that purpose.
2
Evaluate the function of Sentence 4 within the paragraph.
Sentence 4 provides basic chemical description of neon gas (colorless, odorless, inert, monatomic).
This determines if the sentence directly supports the narrative of invention and commercialization or if it introduces tangential information.
3
Compare the sentence's function with the paragraph's focus to make a keep/delete decision.
The sentence is tangential and interrupts the narrative flow, so it should be deleted.
Information that is superficially related to the topic (neon) but does not support the specific focus of the paragraph (Claude's business and invention) should be removed to maintain unity.
4
Select the option that matches the deletion decision and provides the correct rhetorical reason.
The option recommending deletion because the sentence shifts focus to basic scientific facts is the correct choice.
The other options either advocate keeping irrelevant information or provide incorrect justifications for deleting it.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 6Question

In 1873, tailor Jacob Davis and merchant Levi Strauss patented a new type of durable work pants. These pants featured copper rivets at points of strain, such as pocket corners, to prevent tearing. The rivets were manufactured in a small factory located in Maryland. The sturdy trousers, later known as blue jeans, quickly became popular among miners who needed clothing that would not rip during hard labor.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence from the passage. Should this sentence be deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it introduces a detail about the manufacturing location of the rivets that is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus on the design and popularity of the pants.

Answer

Yes, because it introduces a detail about the manufacturing location of the rivets that is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus on the design and popularity of the pants.
The correct option states that the sentence should be deleted because it introduces an irrelevant detail about where the rivets were manufactured. This detail does not support the paragraph's focus on the design, patenting, and popularity of the work pants.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on the patenting, design (copper rivets for durability), and popularity among miners of the new work pants.
Understanding the paragraph's topic is necessary to determine if the sentence in question is relevant.
2
Analyze the content of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence states where the copper rivets were manufactured (a small factory in Maryland).
This helps evaluate if the sentence directly supports the main topic or introduces a tangent.
3
Evaluate the relevance of the sentence and determine the correct decision.
The manufacturing location of the rivets does not contribute to explaining the pants' design or popularity. Therefore, the sentence is irrelevant and should be deleted.
Irrelevant details should be removed to maintain paragraph focus and cohesion.

Key Concept

Evaluating relevance when considering adding or deleting text in a passage.
Estimated Time:50s
Question 7Question

[1] The Eiffel Tower, constructed for the 1889 World's Fair in Paris, was originally intended to be a temporary structure dismantled after twenty years. [2] Many Parisians initially disliked the tower's bold iron lattice structure, calling it an eyesore. [3] Gustave Eiffel, the chief engineer, had previously designed the internal framework for the Statue of Liberty. [4] However, the tower was saved from demolition when its tall antenna proved to be highly valuable for wireless telegraphy.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 3 from the paragraph. Should this sentence be deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because the sentence interrupts the paragraph's focus on the history and preservation of the Eiffel Tower by introducing a tangential detail about the engineer's other work.

Answer

Yes, because the sentence interrupts the paragraph's focus on the history and preservation of the Eiffel Tower by introducing a tangential detail about the engineer's other work.
The paragraph is focused on the construction, reception, and preservation of the Eiffel Tower. Mentioning Gustave Eiffel's prior work on the Statue of Liberty shifts the focus away from the Eiffel Tower itself to a tangential detail about the designer's career. Therefore, the sentence should be deleted.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main topic of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on the history of the Eiffel Tower, including its original temporary purpose, public reception, and how it was saved from demolition.
Understanding the core topic allows you to evaluate whether any sentence is relevant or off-topic.
2
Analyze the sentence in question (Sentence 3) to determine its content and purpose.
Sentence 3 describes Gustave Eiffel's previous work designing the framework of the Statue of Liberty.
Determining what specific information the sentence provides helps identify if it aligns with the paragraph's main topic.
3
Evaluate the relevance of Sentence 3 and decide if it should be kept or deleted.
Since Gustave Eiffel's other projects are not relevant to the history, public reception, or preservation of the Eiffel Tower, the sentence interrupts the narrative and should be deleted.
This confirms both the correct decision (delete) and the correct rhetorical justification.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 8Question

In 1856, eighteen-year-old chemist William Henry Perkin was attempting to synthesize quinine, a treatment for malaria, in his home laboratory. His experiments did not produce quinine; instead, they yielded a dark, sticky sludge. Perkin noticed that this sludge left a vibrant purple residue on the glass of his beaker. Purple has historically been associated with royalty due to the rarity of natural purple dyes. By diluting the residue with alcohol, Perkin isolated a substance he named mauveine, which became the world’s first synthetic organic dye.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the narrative of Perkin's experimental process with tangential information about the cultural history of the color purple.

Answer

The sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the narrative of Perkin's experimental process with tangential information about the cultural history of the color purple.
The option proposing that the sentence be deleted because it interrupts the narrative is correct because the paragraph focuses on the step-by-step laboratory process of Perkin's accidental discovery of mauveine. The historical detail about purple's association with royalty is a digression that interrupts this narrative flow.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph details the chronological steps of William Henry Perkin's accidental discovery of the first synthetic dye, mauveine, during an attempt to synthesize quinine.
To establish the thematic context needed to evaluate the relevance of the underlined sentence.
2
Examine the function of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence introduces the historical association of the color purple with royalty.
To determine whether this information directly supports the narrative of a laboratory experiment.
3
Evaluate the sentence's relevance and choose the correct option.
Since the sentence is a cultural digression that breaks the chronological flow of the laboratory discovery, it should be deleted. The option stating that it should be deleted because it interrupts the narrative of Perkin's process is correct.
To align the rhetorical decision with the correct choice.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 9Question

Old Faithful, a famous geyser in Yellowstone National Park, erupts with remarkable predictability. Visitors from all over the world gather to watch the geyser shoot boiling water high into the air. [1] Early cameras required long exposure times to capture clear images of moving water. Many of these tourists wait patiently on the wooden boardwalk, cameras in hand, for the next eruption to begin.

Should the writer keep or delete Sentence 1?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Delete it, because it introduces details about photography history that distract from the paragraph's focus on watching the geyser erupt.

Answer

Delete it, because it introduces details about photography history that distract from the paragraph's focus on watching the geyser erupt.
The correct answer is to delete the sentence because it introduces details about photography history that distract from the paragraph's focus on watching the geyser erupt. The paragraph is centered on tourists waiting for and watching the eruption of Old Faithful. Introducing historical details about camera exposure times deviates from this focus, making the sentence irrelevant.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes tourists gathering at Yellowstone National Park to watch Old Faithful erupt.
Understanding the main topic of the paragraph is necessary to evaluate whether a sentence belongs in it.
2
Analyze the content of the sentence in question (Sentence 1).
Sentence 1 discusses the history of early cameras and their long exposure times.
This determines what specific information the sentence adds to the passage.
3
Evaluate the relevance of Sentence 1 to the paragraph's focus and choose the correct decision.
The detail about early photography history is irrelevant to the experience of modern tourists watching a geyser. Therefore, the sentence should be deleted.
Irrelevant sentences interrupt the flow of a passage and should be removed.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 10Question

[1] In 1995, the reintroduction of gray wolves to Yellowstone National Park initiated a dramatic ecological transformation known as a trophic cascade. [2] Decades of wolf absence had allowed the elk population to explode, leading to severe overgrazing of willow and aspen trees along riverbanks. [3] Once the wolves returned, their predation and presence forced the elk to avoid open valleys, where they were vulnerable. [4] Consequently, the streamside vegetation began to recover rapidly, stabilizing the soil and reducing erosion. [5] This regrowth of trees attracted songbirds and beavers, who used the wood to build dams, creating habitats for fish, amphibians, and waterfowl. [6] The wolves' return ultimately reshaped not just the animal populations, but the physical geography of the park itself.

At this point, the writer is considering adding the following sentence:
'Beavers are known for their ability to significantly alter river ecosystems by building complex lodges and dams.'

Should the writer make this addition after Sentence 4?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it interrupts the paragraph's detailed tracing of the trophic cascade with a general statement that is redundant with the information in Sentence 5.

Answer

No, because it interrupts the paragraph's detailed tracing of the trophic cascade with a general statement that is redundant with the information in Sentence 5.
The correct option correctly identifies that the proposed sentence should not be added because it disrupts the precise chronological and logical flow of the paragraph. The paragraph details a step-by-step chain of events: wolf reintroduction leads to fewer elk in valleys, which allows vegetation to recover, which in turn attracts beavers that build dams. Inserting a general statement about beaver dam-building behavior after Sentence 4 interrupts this sequence and is redundant, as Sentence 5 already states that the beavers used the wood to build dams.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph explains the cause-and-effect sequence of a trophic cascade in Yellowstone: wolves limit elk grazing, which allows vegetation to recover, which then attracts other animals (like beavers) that modify the ecosystem.
To determine if the proposed sentence is relevant and maintains the paragraph's focus.
2
Evaluate the content of the proposed sentence and its placement after Sentence 4.
The proposed sentence states a general fact about beavers' ability to alter river ecosystems by building dams. Placement after Sentence 4 occurs right after discussing vegetation recovery, but before Sentence 5 introduces beavers being attracted by that vegetation.
To see if the sentence fits logically and chronologically in this specific position.
3
Compare the proposed sentence with the existing text for redundancy and flow.
Sentence 5 already states that beavers 'used the wood to build dams, creating habitats.' The proposed sentence's mention of dam-building is therefore redundant and interrupts the step-by-step narrative flow.
To choose the correct decision (No) and the accurate rhetorical reason.

Key Concept

Evaluating relevance for adding content based on paragraph focus and redundancy.
Question 11Question

During the monsoon season, the steps of the *baoli* (a traditional Indian stepwell) would be submerged, but as the water level receded during dry months, more levels of the structure were revealed. This seasonal rise and fall made the stepwell a dynamic monument, constantly shifting in appearance. In addition to water storage, the stepwells served as cooling chambers; temperatures at the bottom of the descent could be up to six degrees Celsius cooler than at the surface. Modern mechanical cooling systems, which were invented in the early twentieth century, operate on a different thermodynamic principle entirely. This subterranean drop in temperature made the lower ledges of the wells popular gathering spots where local communities could escape the midday heat.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence. Should the writer make this deletion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Delete it, because it introduces a digression about modern cooling systems that deviates from the paragraph's focus on the stepwells' design and social functions.

Answer

Delete the sentence because it introduces a digression about modern cooling systems that deviates from the paragraph's focus on the stepwells' design and social functions.
The paragraph is focused on the design, function, and social utility of traditional stepwells. The underlined sentence introduces an irrelevant detail about the invention and mechanics of modern mechanical cooling systems, which disrupts the flow of the paragraph. Therefore, the sentence should be deleted because it is a digression.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes how stepwells work, their cooling properties, and how these factors made them popular social gathering spaces.
Understanding the paragraph's core topic is essential to evaluating whether any single sentence is relevant.
2
Analyze the content and function of the sentence in question.
The sentence discusses when modern mechanical cooling systems were invented and how they operate on different thermodynamic principles.
This determines if the sentence contributes to or distracts from the main topic.
3
Compare the sentence's function with the paragraph's focus to determine whether to keep or delete it.
The sentence about modern technology is a digression that interrupts the description of stepwells. Therefore, it should be deleted because it is irrelevant.
A sentence should be deleted if it distracts from the paragraph's main theme, even if it shares a general keyword like 'cooling'.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 12Question

[1] In the depths of the ocean, hydrothermal vents support unique ecosystems that thrive completely independent of sunlight. [2] Instead of relying on photosynthesis, the primary producers in these environments—specialized bacteria—utilize chemosynthesis to convert chemical energy from the vents' mineral-rich fluids into organic matter. [3] These chemosynthetic bacteria often form symbiotic relationships with larger organisms, such as giant tube worms, which lack mouths and digestive tracts. [4] Tube worms possess bright red plumes filled with hemoglobin that absorb hydrogen sulfide and oxygen from the water. [5] The bacteria reside inside a specialized organ within the tube worm called a trophosome, where they use the raw materials delivered by the worm's bloodstream to produce nutrients. [6] This elegant partnership demonstrates how life can adapt to survive in some of the most extreme conditions on Earth.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 4 from the passage. Should this sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Kept, because it explains how the tube worms acquire the chemical compounds that the symbiotic bacteria use to generate nutrients.

Answer

The sentence should be kept because it explains how the tube worms acquire the chemical compounds that the symbiotic bacteria use to generate nutrients.
The sentence should be kept because it provides the necessary explanation of how the tube worms absorb the specific chemical compounds (hydrogen sulfide and oxygen) that are transported via their bloodstream to the symbiotic bacteria residing in the trophosome.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the function of Sentence 4 in the context of the paragraph.
Sentence 4 describes the tube worms' plumes absorbing hydrogen sulfide and oxygen from the water.
This identifies the specific substances the worms take in and mentions hemoglobin, which is involved in transport.
2
Analyze Sentence 5 to see if it relies on information from Sentence 4.
Sentence 5 refers to 'raw materials delivered by the worm's bloodstream' which the bacteria use to produce nutrients.
The 'raw materials' are the hydrogen sulfide and oxygen introduced in Sentence 4, and the 'bloodstream' transport is facilitated by the 'hemoglobin' introduced in Sentence 4.
3
Evaluate the impact of deleting Sentence 4.
Without Sentence 4, the phrase 'the raw materials delivered by the worm's bloodstream' in Sentence 5 has no logical antecedent, creating a gap in explanation.
Therefore, Sentence 4 is essential to the paragraph's explanation and must be kept.

Key Concept

Evaluating sentence relevance based on structural cohesion and the establishment of logical antecedents for subsequent sentences.
Question 13Question

[1] In 79 CE, the eruption of Mount Vesuvius buried the villa of Herculaneum, carbonizing hundreds of papyrus scrolls and rendering them too fragile to unroll. [2] For centuries, any attempt to physically open these scrolls resulted in their immediate destruction. [3] Recently, however, researchers have utilized high-resolution X-ray phase-contrast tomography to virtually unwrap the scrolls, revealing the faint density differences between the carbon-based ink and the carbonized papyrus. [4] Advanced machine learning algorithms are then trained to detect these subtle texture variations, translating them into legible Greek characters. [5] Computer scientists have also used similar machine learning models to identify fraudulent paintings in major art museums. [6] As this digital technology continues to advance, scholars hope to recover lost philosophical treatises that have remained unreadable for nearly two millennia.

The author is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the paragraph. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it introduces a separate application of machine learning that digresses from the paragraph's focus on deciphering the scrolls.

Answer

Deleted, because it introduces a separate application of machine learning that digresses from the paragraph's focus on deciphering the scrolls.
The correct option is the one stating the sentence should be deleted because it digresses from the paragraph's focus on deciphering the scrolls. The paragraph centers on the technological process of virtually unwrapping and reading the carbonized scrolls of Herculaneum. Discussing fraudulent paintings in art museums shifts the topic away from this focus and disrupts the flow of the passage.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph details the specific scientific and computational methods used to read the carbonized Herculaneum scrolls.
Determining paragraph unity requires establishing its specific scope.
2
Evaluate the relevance of Sentence 5 to that primary topic.
Sentence 5 discusses using machine learning to detect fraudulent paintings in art museums.
Analyzing the sentence in context reveals whether it contributes to the development of the main topic.
3
Decide whether the sentence should be kept or deleted.
The sentence should be deleted because identifying fake paintings is a different subject that interrupts the development of the scroll-deciphering narrative.
Sentences that digress from the established focus of a paragraph must be removed.
4
Evaluate the options to find the correct decision and logical explanation.
The option recommending deletion because the sentence digresses from the focus on the scrolls is the only one with both a correct decision and an accurate rhetorical reason.
An ACT English add/delete option is only correct if both the yes/no decision and the rationale are sound.

Key Concept

Evaluating relevance for adding or deleting content based on the paragraph's specific focus.
Question 14Question

Beneath the forest floor, a complex web of fungal threads known as mycelium connects the roots of individual trees. This network, often called the "Wood Wide Web," allows trees to share resources, such as carbon, nitrogen, and water, with one another. Through these underground pathways, a mature tree can transfer nutrients to a struggling sapling of a different species, ensuring the survival of the forest community as a whole. Fungi are classified as a distinct kingdom separate from plants and animals. However, this cooperation is not entirely altruistic; the fungi extract a portion of the sugars produced by the trees' photosynthesis to fuel their own growth.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence from the passage. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the cooperative resource-sharing network with an irrelevant taxonomic detail.

Answer

Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the cooperative resource-sharing network with an irrelevant taxonomic detail.
The correct option correctly identifies that the underlined sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's specific focus on the cooperative resource-sharing network between trees with an irrelevant taxonomic detail about the classification of fungi.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on the mutualistic resource-sharing network (mycorrhizal network) between trees, facilitated by fungal mycelium.
Establishing the main topic allows you to evaluate whether any specific sentence contributes directly to that topic or disrupts the flow.
2
Analyze the content and function of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence states that fungi are classified as a distinct kingdom separate from plants and animals, which is a broad taxonomic fact.
Understanding what information the sentence provides is necessary to determine if it is relevant to the paragraph's specific focus.
3
Evaluate the relevance of the underlined sentence to the paragraph's focus.
The sentence is irrelevant because the taxonomic classification of fungi does not explain how the resource-sharing network operates, nor does it fit the transition between the mutualistic sharing of nutrients and the extraction of sugars.
Comparing the sentence's content to the paragraph's focus helps determine if it should be kept or deleted.
4
Select the option that correctly states the decision to delete the sentence and provides the accurate rhetorical reason.
The option stating the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the focus with an irrelevant taxonomic detail is selected.
Only one option contains both the correct decision (delete) and the correct justification (it interrupts the focus with irrelevant details).

Key Concept

Evaluating relevance for adding or deleting content based on paragraph focus.
Question 15Question

In 1783, Joseph-Michel and Jacques-Étienne Montgolfier launched the first manned hot air balloon in Paris. The balloon, constructed of paper and silk, rose over three thousand feet into the air and carried its passengers safely across the city. Today, hot air ballooning is a popular recreational activity and competitive sport worldwide. The success of this flight marked the beginning of human aviation, inspiring subsequent inventors to develop hydrogen balloons and gliders.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence from the passage. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the historical event of the first balloon flight with an irrelevant detail about modern recreation.

Answer

The underlined sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the historical event of the first balloon flight with an irrelevant detail about modern recreation.
The sentence should be deleted because it disrupts the historical narrative of the 1783 flight by introducing modern, irrelevant details about hot air ballooning as a hobby or sport today.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focus is the historical event of the Montgolfier brothers' first hot air balloon flight in 1783 and its immediate impact on early human aviation.
Establishing a baseline focus allows the reader to determine if the underlined sentence contributes to or deviates from the main narrative.
2
Analyze the content of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence describes modern hot air ballooning as a popular recreational activity and competitive sport today.
Determining what information the underlined sentence introduces is necessary to evaluate its relevance.
3
Evaluate whether the sentence should be kept or deleted based on paragraph relevance, and select the option with the correct reasoning.
The sentence should be deleted because modern recreation is irrelevant to the 1783 historical event. The option recommending deletion due to interrupting the historical focus with modern details is correct.
Choosing the correct decision and logical justification leads to the correct answer.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:45s
Question 16Question

[1] In 1938, Ruth Wakefield, owner of the Toll House Inn in Massachusetts, made culinary history when she decided to chop up a bar of semi-sweet chocolate and add it to her cookie dough. [2] She had expected the chocolate chunks to melt and swirl into the dough, but they instead retained their shape, creating the first chocolate chip cookie. [3] Over the years, many bakers have experimented with other cookie recipes, such as oatmeal raisin and peanut butter. [4] The recipe became an instant sensation among her guests, prompting Nestlé to print the Toll House recipe on their chocolate wrappers in exchange for providing Wakefield with a lifetime supply of chocolate.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence [3] from the passage. Should Sentence [3] be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it introduces details about other cookie flavors that distract from the paragraph's focus on the creation of the chocolate chip cookie.

Answer

Deleted, because it introduces details about other cookie flavors that distract from the paragraph's focus on the creation of the chocolate chip cookie.
The correct option is correct because the paragraph is strictly focused on the invention and success of the chocolate chip cookie. Sentence 3 introduces details about other cookie flavors (oatmeal raisin and peanut butter) and other bakers, which deviates from this specific topic and interrupts the flow of the passage.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes how Ruth Wakefield invented the chocolate chip cookie at her inn and its subsequent popularity.
Establishing the paragraph's main focus is essential for determining if individual sentences are relevant.
2
Analyze the purpose and content of Sentence 3.
Sentence 3 discusses other bakers experimenting with oatmeal raisin and peanut butter cookie recipes.
Evaluating the specific content of the sentence reveals whether it supports or departs from the main topic.
3
Decide whether the sentence should be kept or deleted, and select the correct rhetorical justification.
The sentence should be deleted because it introduces irrelevant information about other cookie flavors, which distracts from the narrative about the chocolate chip cookie.
Comparing the sentence content to the paragraph focus shows that it is an irrelevant distraction, which matches the option advising deletion due to distraction.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 17Question

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the passage (placed after Sentence 3):

"Darwin, in particular, was deeply concerned that Kelvin's timeline did not allow enough time for natural selection to produce the Earth's diverse life forms."

Should the writer make this addition?

[1] In the mid-nineteenth century, the physicist Lord Kelvin attempted to calculate the age of the Earth by measuring its geothermal heat loss. [2] Assuming the Earth began as a molten sphere and had been cooling steadily, Kelvin estimated its age to be between 20 and 400 million years. [3] While this calculation was far longer than the biblical timeline accepted by many at the time, it was hotly contested by geologists and biologists, who argued that evolutionary and geological processes required billions of years. [4] Kelvin's calculations, though mathematically rigorous, were ultimately flawed because he was unaware of radioactivity, which releases heat within the Earth's interior and delays cooling. [5] The discovery of radioactive decay by Henri Becquerel in 1896 eventually provided the key to accurately dating the planet at 4.5 billion years.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it offers a specific, relevant example of a biologist whose theories were challenged by Kelvin’s timeline, supporting the general statement in Sentence 3.

Answer

Yes, because it offers a specific, relevant example of a biologist whose theories were challenged by Kelvin’s timeline, supporting the general statement in Sentence 3.
The correct answer is the option indicating that the sentence should be added because it offers a specific, relevant example of a biologist whose theories were challenged by Kelvin’s timeline. Sentence 3 states that Kelvin's calculations were contested by biologists who argued that evolutionary processes required billions of years. The proposed sentence provides a concrete illustration of this point by naming Charles Darwin and his concern regarding the time needed for natural selection, thereby supporting the claim made in Sentence 3 and maintaining the paragraph's flow.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph outlines Lord Kelvin's attempt to calculate the age of the Earth, the opposition his timeline faced from other scientists (geologists and biologists), and how the discovery of radioactivity eventually resolved the debate.
Understanding the paragraph's main theme is essential to evaluate the relevance of any proposed addition.
2
Evaluate the content of the proposed sentence and its relationship to the surrounding sentences.
The proposed sentence states that Charles Darwin was concerned about Kelvin's timeline because it did not allow enough time for natural selection. This directly details the biological objections mentioned in Sentence 3.
This determines if the proposed sentence is relevant and where it logically fits in the narrative flow.
3
Evaluate the options to match the correct decision and justification.
Since the sentence is relevant and supports the previous sentence's general claim, it should be added. The option explaining that it offers a specific, relevant example of a biologist whose theories were challenged by the timeline is correct.
Only one option correctly identifies both the decision to add the sentence and the rhetorically sound justification for doing so.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 18Question

[1] Restoring centuries-old oil paintings requires removing layers of accumulated dirt and discolored varnish without damaging the delicate paint underneath. [2] Historically, conservators relied on chemical solvents, which were difficult to control and could permanently dissolve the original pigment. [3] Today, many restoration experts are turning to laser ablation, a technique that uses short pulses of light to vaporize surface grime. [4] This method is highly precise; by adjusting the laser's wavelength, conservators can target specific foreign substances while leaving the paint intact. [5] The chemical composition of historical oil paints varied significantly depending on the region and the decade in which the artist worked. [6] Consequently, this advanced technology allows masterpieces to be cleaned with unprecedented safety, preserving the artist's original vision.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the passage. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Delete, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the mechanics and safety of laser restoration technology.

Answer

Delete, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the mechanics and safety of laser restoration technology.
The correct option is the one stating that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the mechanics and safety of laser restoration technology. The paragraph focuses on how restoration methods have evolved, specifically comparing the risks of chemical solvents with the benefits of laser ablation. Sentence 5, which discusses variations in paint composition, is a digression that interrupts the logical flow from Sentence 4 (the precision of the laser) to Sentence 6 (the conclusion that this technology allows for safer cleaning).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the primary focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph discusses the methods used to restore historical oil paintings, contrasting the lack of control associated with traditional chemical solvents (Sentence 2) with the precision and safety of modern laser ablation technology (Sentences 3, 4, and 6).
Establishing the main topic is necessary to evaluate if Sentence 5 is relevant or if it digresses from the main argument.
2
Examine the content of Sentence 5 and determine its relationship to the surrounding sentences.
Sentence 5 discusses how the chemical composition of oil paints varied by region and decade. While it contains related keywords (paint, artist), it does not explain how this variation affects laser restoration, nor does it support the argument about the safety and precision of the technology.
This helps identify whether Sentence 5 contributes to the logical development of the paragraph or acts as a distraction.
3
Evaluate the transition between Sentence 4 and Sentence 6 without Sentence 5.
Sentence 4 explains how adjusting the wavelength makes the laser precise, and Sentence 6 concludes that 'Consequently, this advanced technology allows masterpieces to be cleaned with unprecedented safety.' Sentence 6 directly follows the logic of Sentence 4. Inserting Sentence 5 between them disrupts this transition.
Confirming the flow demonstrates that deleting the sentence improves paragraph unity and cohesion.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 19Question

In 1783, the Montgolfier brothers, Joseph-Michel and Jacques-Étienne, made history by launching the first passenger-carrying hot air balloon in Versailles, France. The balloon, constructed of paper and silk, carried a sheep, a duck, and a rooster to test the safety of flight in the upper atmosphere. Versailles, famous for its grand palace, had served as the seat of French political power since 1682. The successful eight-minute flight proved that living creatures could survive the ascent, paving the way for the first human balloonists later that year.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the balloon flight with unrelated details about the history of Versailles.

Answer

Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the balloon flight with unrelated details about the history of Versailles.
The correct option is the one stating the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus. The paragraph focuses on the pioneering hot air balloon flight of the Montgolfier brothers. The historical and political background of Versailles, while factual, is irrelevant to the scientific and narrative details of the aviation experiment and should be removed.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the hot air balloon launch by the Montgolfier brothers in 1783, including the construction of the balloon, the animals carried as passengers, and the success of the test flight.
Understanding the paragraph's topic is necessary to evaluate the relevance of any single sentence.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the underlined sentence to the paragraph's main focus.
The underlined sentence discusses the political history of Versailles as the seat of French power since 1682. This detail does not contribute to the narrative of the balloon flight or its scientific significance.
This helps determine whether the sentence should be kept or deleted.
3
Choose the option that states the correct action (delete) and provides the correct rhetorical reason.
The sentence should be deleted because it introduces irrelevant information about Versailles, interrupting the focus on the aviation event.
Only one option correctly identifies the action and logical justification.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 20Question

[1] In the winter of 1902, during a visit to New York City, Mary Anderson observed a trolley driver struggling to keep the windshield clear of freezing sleet. [2] The driver had to open the front window, lean out into the icy wind, or even stop the trolley entirely to wipe the glass by hand. [3] Recognizing a clear need, Anderson sketched a design for a hand-operated rubber squeegee blade that could be controlled via a lever inside the vehicle. [4] She was granted a patent for her window-cleaning device in 1903. [5] Early twentieth-century trolleys and automobiles operated at much slower speeds than modern vehicles do. [6] Unfortunately, automotive manufacturers of the era failed to see the commercial value in her design, mistakenly believing that the motion of the blades would distract drivers.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the paragraph. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the development and reception of Anderson's invention with an irrelevant detail about the operating speeds of early vehicles.

Answer

Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the development and reception of Anderson's invention with an irrelevant detail about the operating speeds of early vehicles.
The correct choice is the option that suggests deleting the sentence because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the development and reception of Anderson's invention. The paragraph is centered on how Mary Anderson saw a problem and invented a solution, which was subsequently rejected by manufacturers. The speed of early twentieth-century vehicles is an unrelated detail that distracts from this sequence of events.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes Mary Anderson observing a problem, inventing the windshield wiper, receiving a patent, and having it rejected by manufacturers.
Establishing the paragraph's core topic is necessary to evaluate the relevance of any single sentence.
2
Evaluate the content and role of Sentence 5.
Sentence 5 discusses the slow speeds of early twentieth-century vehicles compared to modern ones.
Determining what Sentence 5 contributes allows us to see if it supports the core topic or distracts from it.
3
Determine whether to keep or delete the sentence based on its relevance.
The sentence shifts the focus away from the invention story to general vehicle speeds, making it irrelevant. It should be deleted.
Irrelevant sentences that disrupt the flow and focus of a paragraph should be deleted.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Page 1 / 4Next