A writer is editing a passage about the history of industrial chemistry and has drafted the following paragraph:
In 1856, eighteen-year-old chemist William Henry Perkin was attempting to synthesize quinine, a treatment for malaria, in his home laboratory. Instead of obtaining a clear drug, he produced a dark, sticky sludge. Cleaning his flask with alcohol, Perkin noticed that the mixture turned a vibrant, deep purple. [1] Perkin had accidentally created mauveine, the world’s first synthetic aniline dye. This new substance revolutionized the textile industry and birthed the modern chemical industry.
The writer is considering adding the following sentence at Point [1]:
"At the time, purple dye was traditionally extracted from sea snails, making it so expensive that only royalty could afford it."
Should the writer make this addition?
- Yes, because it provides historical context that helps explain the revolutionary impact of Perkin's synthetic dye.Answer
- BYes, because it explains why Perkin was specifically trying to produce a purple dye rather than malaria medication.
- CNo, because it interrupts the description of Perkin’s chemical experiment to introduce irrelevant details about historical fashion.
- DNo, because it repeats information about the costs of textile manufacturing that is stated elsewhere in the paragraph.