[1] The Eiffel Tower, constructed for the 1889 World's Fair in Paris, was originally intended to be a temporary structure dismantled after twenty years. [2] Many Parisians initially disliked the tower's bold iron lattice structure, calling it an eyesore. [3] Gustave Eiffel, the chief engineer, had previously designed the internal framework for the Statue of Liberty. [4] However, the tower was saved from demolition when its tall antenna proved to be highly valuable for wireless telegraphy.
The writer is considering deleting Sentence 3 from the paragraph. Should this sentence be deleted?
- AYes, because the sentence contradicts the paragraph's assertion that the Eiffel Tower was built for the 1889 World's Fair.
- BNo, because the sentence provides essential background information about the design similarities between the Eiffel Tower and the Statue of Liberty.
- Yes, because the sentence interrupts the paragraph's focus on the history and preservation of the Eiffel Tower by introducing a tangential detail about the engineer's other work.Answer
- DNo, because the sentence establishes Gustave Eiffel's credentials, which explains why his tower was not demolished.
Answer
Yes, because the sentence interrupts the paragraph's focus on the history and preservation of the Eiffel Tower by introducing a tangential detail about the engineer's other work.
The paragraph is focused on the construction, reception, and preservation of the Eiffel Tower. Mentioning Gustave Eiffel's prior work on the Statue of Liberty shifts the focus away from the Eiffel Tower itself to a tangential detail about the designer's career. Therefore, the sentence should be deleted.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:1m 0s