All practice questions

5556 questions

Question 41Question

In the mid-twentieth century, the modern conservation movement was revolutionized by the introduction of the wilderness concept. Proponents of this philosophy argued that certain natural areas should be set aside and completely protected from human development. This marked a significant departure from earlier conservation efforts, which had focused primarily on the sustainable extraction of resources like timber and minerals. The U.S. Congress formalized this new approach by passing the Wilderness Act of 1964, which legally defined wilderness as "an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man." Some early drafts of the legislation were composed on manual typewriters in crowded congressional offices. Today, this landmark act protects over one hundred million acres of public land, ensuring that these ecosystems remain undisturbed for future generations.

The writer is considering deleting the sentence "Some early drafts of the legislation were composed on manual typewriters in crowded congressional offices" from the paragraph. Should this sentence be deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of the Wilderness Act's legislative significance with an irrelevant detail about the physical drafting of the bill.

Answer

Yes, because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of the Wilderness Act's legislative significance with an irrelevant detail about the physical drafting of the bill.
The correct choice accurately identifies that the sentence should be deleted because it introduces a minor physical detail (the use of manual typewriters in crowded offices) that interrupts the cohesive discussion of the Wilderness Act's conceptual development and long-term impact on conservation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on the shift in the conservation movement toward the wilderness concept, culminating in the Wilderness Act of 1964 and its modern impact.
Establishing the main idea of the passage is necessary to evaluate whether a specific sentence is relevant or extraneous.
2
Analyze the sentence proposed for deletion to determine its function and relevance.
The sentence describes the physical act of drafting the bill on manual typewriters. This detail does not contribute to the description of the conservation philosophy or the legal significance of the act.
Evaluating the specific content of the sentence helps determine if it adds useful support or creates a logical digression.
3
Determine whether the sentence should be kept or deleted, and select the option with the correct justification.
The sentence should be deleted because it introduces irrelevant information that breaks the paragraph's focus. The option identifying this interruption is the correct choice.
Ensures that both the decision (delete) and the rhetorical reason (interruption of the paragraph's main focus) align logically.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 42Question

During the late nineteenth century, the invention of the kinetoscope revolutionized the entertainment industry, public parlors opened across the country, allowing patrons to view short, moving pictures through a peephole viewer.

Which of the following is the best replacement for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: industry; public

Answer

industry; public
The correct option correctly uses a semicolon to join two independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction. Both 'During the late nineteenth century, the invention of the kinetoscope revolutionized the entertainment industry' and 'public parlors opened across the country...' can stand alone as complete sentences, making the semicolon the appropriate punctuation mark.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the clause structure of both parts of the sentence separated by the underline.
The first part ('During the late nineteenth century, the invention of the kinetoscope revolutionized the entertainment industry') is an independent clause. The second part ('public parlors opened across the country, allowing patrons to view short, moving pictures through a peephole viewer') is also an independent clause.
Determining whether the clauses are independent or dependent is necessary to choose the correct punctuation.
2
Select the correct punctuation to join two independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction.
A semicolon is required to separate the two independent clauses, and no coordinating conjunction or subordinating conjunction should be added.
A comma alone creates a comma splice, whereas a semicolon properly links two closely related independent clauses.

Key Concept

Semicolons
Question 43Question

Identify the punctuation mark that must be placed in the blank to grammatically join the two independent clauses in the sentence below.

Fill in the blanks below

Physarum polycephalum is a single-celled organism that lacks a brain or central nervous system nevertheless, the slime mold can solve complex mazes and remember the shortest paths to food sources.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

semicolon (represented by the symbol ';')
A semicolon is the correct punctuation mark to join two independent clauses when the second clause begins with a transitional adverb like 'nevertheless'. This structure requires a semicolon before the transition and a comma after it.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the clauses on both sides of the blank to determine if they are independent.
The clause before the blank ('Physarum polycephalum is a single-celled organism that lacks a brain or central nervous system') and the clause after the blank ('nevertheless, the slime mold can solve complex mazes and remember the shortest paths to food sources') are both independent clauses because they can each stand alone as a complete sentence.
Identifying the clause type is necessary to determine the appropriate punctuation to join them.
2
Identify the transition word initiating the second clause.
The word 'nevertheless' is a conjunctive adverb (transitional adverb).
Conjunctive adverbs require specific punctuation configurations when used to link independent clauses.
3
Determine the correct punctuation mark that must precede the conjunctive adverb.
A semicolon must be placed in the blank to separate the two independent clauses before the conjunctive adverb.
Joining two independent clauses with only a comma before a transitional adverb creates a comma splice, and using no punctuation is run-on.

Key Concept

Using a semicolon to link independent clauses connected by transitional adverbs.
Question 44Question

Passage Excerpt:

In the late nineteenth century, audio was captured on fragile, spinning wax cylinders. Over time, these cylinders have degraded, making them too delicate to be played by a physical stylus without destroying the recordings. To retrieve these sounds, scientists developed IRENE, a system that uses digital imaging. [Underlined: A camera captures high-resolution images of the grooves to create a 3D digital model, avoiding any physical contact.] This visual map is then translated by computer software back into audio, allowing archivists to preserve lost voices.

Question:

The writer wants to choose an option that most clearly explains the specific mechanism of the IRENE system while emphasizing how it protects the fragile cylinders from damage. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A camera captures high-resolution images of the grooves to create a 3D digital model, avoiding any physical contact.

Answer

The correct option is the one stating that a camera captures high-resolution images of the grooves to create a 3D digital model, avoiding any physical contact.
The correct option explains the specific mechanism of the IRENE system (using high-resolution images to create a 3D digital model) and directly emphasizes how it protects the cylinders by avoiding physical contact.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goals requested.
The prompt requires two criteria: (1) explaining the specific mechanism of the IRENE system, and (2) emphasizing how it protects fragile cylinders from damage.
Understanding the precise criteria of the rhetorical goal is necessary to evaluate the options.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
The option containing 'images of the grooves, it creates...' is a comma splice and is grammatically incorrect, so it can be eliminated.
ACT English requires all answers to follow standard grammar rules, meaning grammatically incorrect choices are automatically wrong.
3
Evaluate the remaining grammatically correct choices against the rhetorical criteria.
The choice mentioning 'advanced scanning technology' is too vague. The choice mentioning 'a physical needle' fails to describe the mechanism of IRENE. Only the choice stating that 'a camera captures high-resolution images of the grooves to create a 3D digital model, avoiding any physical contact' satisfies both criteria.
Selecting the option that fully meets all parts of the rhetorical goal leads to the correct answer.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Question 45Question

In 1857, French inventor Édouard-Léon Scott de Martinville patented the phonautograph, the earliest known device for recording sound. Unlike Thomas Edison's phonograph, which could both record and play back audio, Scott's invention was designed only to write sound waves onto soot-coated paper. Scott believed that these visual transcriptions, which he called "phonautograms," could eventually be read by eye. Consequently, because he never intended for his recordings to be heard, they remained silent, unplayed artifacts for over a century.

In 2008, scientists at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory utilized digital scanning technology to examine Scott's surviving papers. By mapping the soot patterns and translating them into digital audio files, they successfully recovered the voice of a woman singing the French folk song "Au Clair de la Lune." [1]

The writer wants to add a sentence at [1] to conclude the passage by emphasizing the historic significance of Scott's invention. Which choice most effectively accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Although Scott died believing his work was a failure, the successful recovery of these sounds proved that his device had indeed captured the first recorded voice in human history.

Answer

The sentence concluding that although Scott died believing his work was a failure, the successful recovery of these sounds proved that his device had indeed captured the first recorded voice in human history.
The correct choice effectively concludes the passage by linking the recovery of Scott's phonautograms to the significance of his invention, highlighting that it successfully captured the first recorded voice in human history. It introduces no grammatical errors and directly satisfies the rhetorical goal.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the writing goal specified in the prompt.
The goal is to conclude the passage by emphasizing the historic significance of Scott's invention.
Identifying the precise rhetorical goal helps eliminate options that focus on irrelevant details.
2
Evaluate the options for relevance and completeness of content.
The option summarizing Scott's legacy as the first recorded voice successfully meets this goal, whereas the option about Edison's movie technology introduces unrelated details.
A strong conclusion must wrap up the main theme without introducing new, unsupported details.
3
Examine the remaining options for grammatical correctness.
The option with the comma splice and the option with commas around the restrictive clause are grammatically incorrect.
ACT English questions require that the correct option must also be free of grammatical errors.

Key Concept

Selecting Concluding Sentences and Transitions
Question 46Question

Termites are master builders, constructing towering mounds that can reach up to thirty feet in height on the African savanna. Despite the scorching daytime heat, the temperature inside these mounds remains remarkably stable. This thermal regulation is achieved through a complex network of vents and tunnels that facilitate passive ventilation. Warm air rises and escapes through a central chimney, while cooler air is drawn in at the base.

Which of the following sentences, if added at the end of the paragraph, would provide the most effective conclusion to the paragraph?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Ultimately, this continuous flow of air ensures that the mound remains cool even in the hottest weather.

Answer

Ultimately, this continuous flow of air ensures that the mound remains cool even in the hottest weather.
The correct option effectively concludes the paragraph by reinforcing the main topic of passive ventilation and temperature control. It connects the explanation of rising warm air and incoming cool air to the overall thermal stability of the mound.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph explains how termite mounds maintain a stable internal temperature through passive ventilation.
The concluding sentence must summarize or logically wrap up this main focus.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
The option containing 'Consequently, the ventilation system...' contains a comma splice. The option containing 'In contrast, the colony had maintained...' has an incorrect tense shift.
Eliminating grammatically incorrect options helps narrow down the choices.
3
Evaluate the remaining choices for relevance and closure.
The option introducing the classification of termites as social insects adds a new, unrelated detail. The option concluding with 'Ultimately, this continuous flow of air...' directly wraps up the passive ventilation explanation.
An effective conclusion must summarize the topic rather than introduce new, unrelated ideas.

Key Concept

Selecting Concluding Sentences
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 47Question

The following passage is an excerpt from an essay about Egyptology.

For centuries, the hieroglyphic inscriptions on Egyptian monuments remained an impenetrable mystery to scholars. In 1799, French soldiers discovered a dark granodiorite slab near the port city of Rashid. This artifact, later named the Rosetta Stone, contained the same decree written in three different scripts. The decipherment of the stone was not immediate, however, scholars struggled for decades to decode the glyphs because they did not understand that the symbols represented both sounds and concepts.

Which of the following is the best alternative for the underlined portion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: immediate, however. Scholars

Answer

The correct choice is the option that ends the first sentence with a period after 'however' and starts a new sentence with 'Scholars'.
The correct option uses a period to separate two distinct independent clauses. The word 'however' functions as an adverb at the end of the first sentence ('The decipherment of the stone was not immediate, however'), which is followed by a new sentence beginning with the subject 'Scholars'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the clause boundaries in the passage.
There are two independent clauses: 'The decipherment of the stone was not immediate, however' and 'scholars struggled for decades to decode the glyphs...'
Knowing where clauses begin and end helps determine which punctuation marks are grammatically required.
2
Evaluate the relationship between the two clauses.
Since both are independent clauses, they must be separated by a terminal punctuation mark (like a period), a semicolon, or a comma plus a coordinating conjunction.
Joining two independent clauses with just a comma results in a comma splice error.
3
Check the grammatical correctness of each choice.
Placing a period after 'however' and capitalizing the first letter of 'scholars' successfully separates the two sentences without creating fragments or splices.
This resolves the comma splice while maintaining the intended adverbial transition at the end of the first sentence.

Key Concept

Separating independent clauses with appropriate end-of-sentence punctuation to avoid comma splices and fragments.
Question 48Question

In 1977, oceanographers exploring the Galápagos Rift made a discovery that fundamentally altered our understanding of biology. Using the deep-diving submersible Alvin, scientists observed hydrothermal vents—geothermal geysers on the seafloor spewing superheated, mineral-rich water. To their astonishment, these dark, high-pressure environments were teeming with complex life, including giant tube worms and ghost-white crabs.

[1]

Previously, scientists believed that all food chains on Earth ultimately relied on sunlight for energy through photosynthesis. However, these vent communities thrived in complete darkness. Instead of using sunlight, specialized bacteria in the vents utilized hydrogen sulfide—a toxic chemical to most land animals—to produce organic molecules. This process, known as chemosynthesis, proved that life could flourish under conditions once thought completely uninhabitable.

Which choice provides the most effective transition from the preceding paragraph to the paragraph that follows?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: This diverse ecosystem challenged long-held assumptions about the necessity of sunlight for sustaining life.

Answer

This diverse ecosystem challenged long-held assumptions about the necessity of sunlight for sustaining life.
The correct option effectively connects the rich ecosystem discovered at the vents (mentioned at the end of the first paragraph) to the subsequent discussion of how these organisms survive without sunlight (which is the focus of the second paragraph). It is grammatically correct and uses the appropriate preposition 'about' after 'assumptions'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the ending of the first paragraph and the beginning of the second paragraph.
The first paragraph ends by describing a teeming ecosystem of tube worms and crabs in the deep sea. The second paragraph begins by discussing the previous scientific belief that all food chains rely on sunlight.
An effective paragraph transition must connect these two main ideas logically.
2
Evaluate the choices for transition relevance and grammatical correctness.
The correct option connects the 'diverse ecosystem' (referring to the creatures in the first paragraph) to the 'necessity of sunlight' (introducing the topic of the second paragraph) and is grammatically correct.
This bridges the gap between the two paragraphs smoothly and logically.
3
Identify grammatical and rhetorical errors in the remaining choices.
The option about Alvin's salvage design is irrelevant to the paragraph's shift in topic. The option about creatures not requiring sunlight is a comma splice. The option about being dependent to sunlight uses incorrect prepositional idiom.
Standard ACT questions test both rhetorical flow and grammatical correctness.

Key Concept

Paragraph-Level Transitions
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 49Question

The following paragraphs are from an essay about Alexander Fleming's discovery of penicillin. Arrange the paragraphs in the most logical order to create a cohesive transition flow.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence is: the introduction introducing Alexander Fleming and the unusual petri dish, followed by the specific details about the mold contamination, and concluding with the long-term impact of the penicillin discovery.
The paragraph introducing Alexander Fleming and the unusual petri dish sets the context. The paragraph starting with 'Specifically' details that unusual observation. The final paragraph starting with 'Ultimately' summarizes the overall impact of the discovery.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the introductory paragraph.
The paragraph starting with 'In 1928, bacteriologist Alexander Fleming returned...' does not rely on any preceding transition words and sets up the narrative context.
An effective passage opening provides necessary background context rather than building on previous sentences.
2
Find the logical connection for the middle paragraph.
The paragraph starting with 'Specifically, he observed...' details the unusual observation mentioned in the introduction.
The transition word 'Specifically' signals that the writer is narrowing focus to describe the 'something unusual' mentioned in the previous sentence.
3
Determine the concluding paragraph.
The paragraph starting with 'Ultimately, this accidental finding...' summarizes the outcome of the discovery.
The transition word 'Ultimately' and the phrase 'this accidental finding' connect directly to the events described in the preceding paragraphs and provide a resolution.

Key Concept

Logical paragraph flow and the use of transitional words and phrases to bridge ideas.
Question 50Question

During the nineteenth century, the printing industry underwent rapid technological growth, demanding faster methods for producing newspapers and books. To speed up the typesetting process, workers cast commonly used phrases or words into single metal plates rather than composing them letter by letter. These cast plates were named after the clicking sound made during their creation: clichés. The term eventually transitioned from a technical printing word to a metaphor for overused expressions.

Which choice most effectively concludes the paragraph by reinforcing the relationship between the origin of the term 'cliché' and its current definition?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Ultimately, a term that once represented industrial efficiency in the printing shop came to signify a lack of original thought in writing.

Answer

Ultimately, a term that once represented industrial efficiency in the printing shop came to signify a lack of original thought in writing.
The correct choice successfully wraps up the paragraph by summarizing how a word born from the mechanical process of typesetting plates evolved into a metaphor for unoriginal expressions. It directly addresses the prompt's request to tie the term's origin to its current definition without introducing extraneous details.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt's specific requirements.
The prompt asks for a concluding sentence that reinforces the relationship between the origin of the term 'cliché' (typesetting plates for printing efficiency) and its current definition (overused/unoriginal expressions).
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the choices.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
One option contains a comma splice by joining two independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction. Another option contains punctuation errors by placing commas around a restrictive clause. This leaves two grammatically correct choices.
ACT English questions require sentences to be grammatically correct in addition to meeting rhetorical goals.
3
Evaluate the remaining grammatically correct choices for relevance and focus.
One option introduces new, unrelated details about telegraph systems. The other option directly connects the industrial origin of the term in the printing shop to its modern meaning of unoriginal thought in writing, satisfying the prompt's requirements.
The correct concluding sentence must wrap up the main ideas of the paragraph without introducing off-topic information.

Key Concept

Selecting Concluding Sentences and Transitions
Question 51Question

In 1912, German meteorologist Alfred Wegener proposed the theory of continental drift, suggesting that all landmasses were once joined. Wegener argued that the continents fit together like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. The evidence, that he compiled, from fossil distributions and rock formations, supported his claims, but his contemporaries remained unconvinced.

Choose the option that represents the correct punctuation for the underlined portion.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: evidence that he compiled, from fossil distributions and rock formations, supported

Answer

The correct choice is the option that removes the commas around the restrictive clause and retains the comma pair around the parenthetical phrase.
The correct choice properly omits commas around the restrictive clause 'that he compiled' because it is essential to identifying which evidence is being discussed. Additionally, it correctly uses a pair of commas to set off the nonessential, parenthetical prepositional phrase 'from fossil distributions and rock formations' that interrupts the subject and its verb 'supported'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the relative clause 'that he compiled' to determine if it is restrictive or nonrestrictive.
The relative clause is restrictive because it is essential to defining and identifying which specific 'evidence' is being discussed.
Restrictive clauses must not be set off by commas.
2
Analyze the prepositional phrase 'from fossil distributions and rock formations' to determine if it is essential or parenthetical.
The phrase is parenthetical and nonessential because it interrupts the subject 'evidence' and the verb 'supported' to provide illustrative examples.
Nonessential parenthetical elements that interrupt a main clause must be enclosed by a matching pair of commas.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the one that removes commas around the relative clause while maintaining both commas around the parenthetical phrase.
The option that reads 'evidence that he compiled, from fossil distributions and rock formations, supported' correctly applies these rules.
This configuration maintains clear subject-verb connection while properly punctuating the nonessential interruption.

Key Concept

Commas with Nonessential and Parenthetical Elements
Question 52Question

The sentences below are from a draft of an essay about Mesoamerican architecture. To ensure that the paragraph logically builds its claim that the pyramid produces a bird-like sound and explains how this effect is achieved, in what order should the sentences be placed?

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The paragraph should begin with the claim that a handclap at the pyramid's base triggers an echo resembling the call of a resplendent quetzal, followed by the expert verification comparing the echo's frequency spectrum to the bird's vocalizations. Next, the sentence introducing the specific construction details of the limestone staircases should follow, and the paragraph should conclude with the explanation of how these steps scatter the sound waves.
The correct order establishes the claim that the echo mimics the quetzal's call, follows it with the scientific evidence comparing the frequency spectrum, introduces the limestone staircases as the cause, and concludes with how those steps scatter sound waves. This sequence ensures that evidence directly supports the initial claim and details flow logically with clear pronoun antecedents.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the introductory claim
The sentence describing the phenomenon of the handclap triggering a chirping echo that sounds like a quetzal functions as the introductory claim.
It introduces the central topic and claim of the paragraph.
2
Connect the claim to its supporting evidence
The sentence detailing how acoustics experts verified the phenomenon by comparing the echo's frequency spectrum to actual bird vocalizations must follow the claim.
It provides immediate scientific evidence validating the initial claim.
3
Introduce the architectural mechanism
The sentence introducing the construction of the limestone staircases with specific dimensions is placed third.
It shifts the focus from the existence of the phenomenon to the explanation of its cause.
4
Connect details of the mechanism using pronoun references
The sentence explaining how the sound waves are scattered by the steps is placed last.
The demonstrative phrase 'These carefully calculated steps' requires a direct antecedent, which is the 'staircases' introduced in the preceding step.

Key Concept

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 53Question

Located on the northeast coast of Northern Ireland, the Giant's Causeway is an area of about 40,000 interlocking basalt columns. The site , which was formed by an ancient volcanic fissure eruption, attracts thousands of tourists and geologists each year. Visitors marvel at the near-perfect hexagonal pillars that stretch from the cliffs into the sea.

Which choice is the most grammatically correct punctuation of the underlined portion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: , which was formed by an ancient volcanic fissure eruption, attracts

Answer

The correct answer is the option that uses the pronoun 'which' and sets off the nonessential relative clause with commas both before and after: ', which was formed by an ancient volcanic fissure eruption, attracts'.
The relative clause describing the volcanic origin of the site is nonessential because 'the site' is already identified as the Giant's Causeway. Nonessential clauses must be set off by a pair of commas. The correct option correctly includes both the opening comma after 'site' and the closing comma after 'eruption'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine if the underlined clause is essential or nonessential to the meaning of the sentence.
The clause 'which was formed by an ancient volcanic fissure eruption' provides extra description about 'the site' (the Giant's Causeway) but is not required to identify it. Therefore, it is a nonessential (nonrestrictive) clause.
The site has already been uniquely identified in the previous sentence as the Giant's Causeway, making any subsequent descriptive clause nonessential.
2
Apply the punctuation rule for nonessential elements.
Nonessential elements must be set off from the rest of the sentence by a matching pair of punctuation marks, such as commas.
Omitting one of the commas or using a semicolon violates the rules of sentence structure and creates punctuation errors.

Key Concept

Nonessential (nonrestrictive) clauses add extra details to a sentence and must be set off by commas. Restrictive clauses are essential to the meaning and must not be separated from their referents by commas.
Question 54Question

Cellulose nitrate served as the primary base for motion picture film from the inception of cinema until the early 1950s, lauded for its luminous quality and high tensile strength. However, this compound is notoriously unstable: it is highly flammable, prone to spontaneous combustion under ambient conditions, and susceptible to auto-catalytic decay that reduces the film to an acidic, highly combustible powder. [1] __________________________________________________ Consequently, archives worldwide must house these fragile historical documents in specialized, sub-freezing vaults designed to suppress chemical degradation and mitigate fire hazards.

Which choice most effectively introduces the paragraph's discussion of the specialized storage and safety measures required to preserve cellulose nitrate film?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Managing the degradation of this material requires strict safety measures and precise climate controls.

Answer

The choice that states that managing the degradation of the material requires strict safety measures and precise climate controls.
The correct choice is grammatically sound and directly introduces the concepts of safety measures and climate controls. This sets up the following sentence, which explains that archives keep the reels in specialized, climate-controlled vaults to prevent degradation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the surrounding context of the paragraph to identify the central focus.
The paragraph describes the physical instability of cellulose nitrate film and concludes by mentioning that archives house these films in specialized, sub-freezing vaults.
Understanding the surrounding context helps determine what information is needed to logically bridge the preceding and succeeding sentences.
2
Evaluate the rhetorical goal specified in the prompt.
The sentence must introduce the paragraph's discussion of specialized storage and safety measures.
This identifies the topic that the correct choice must establish.
3
Examine the grammatical structure of each choice to eliminate incorrect options.
The choices containing a fragment, a semicolon error, or a comma splice are grammatically incorrect.
ACT English questions require the selected choice to be both rhetorically appropriate and grammatically correct.

Key Concept

Establishing paragraph-level introductions and thesis statements while maintaining proper sentence structure.
Question 55Question

The following passage is an excerpt from a biography of Filippo Brunelleschi.

Filippo Brunelleschi’s dome for the Florence Cathedral remains a marvel of the Renaissance. The massive brick structure—a masterpiece of Renaissance engineering, puzzled contemporary builders who deemed its construction impossible without temporary wooden scaffolding. Brunelleschi resolved this challenge by inventing an entirely new hoisting machine and utilizing a herringbone brick-laying pattern.

Which of the following choices best completes the sentence, ensuring correct punctuation and sentence structure?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: engineering—puzzled

Answer

The correct option is the one that reads 'engineering—puzzled', as it uses a matching em dash to close the nonessential parenthetical phrase.
The correct choice is 'engineering—puzzled'. The phrase 'a masterpiece of Renaissance engineering' is a nonessential appositive that interrupts the main flow of the sentence to describe the 'massive brick structure'. Because this nonessential element begins with an em dash, it must also end with an em dash to maintain punctuation consistency. This allows the main subject, 'structure', to connect properly with its verb, 'puzzled'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the role of the underlined phrase within the sentence.
The phrase 'a masterpiece of Renaissance engineering' is a nonessential parenthetical appositive that describes the 'massive brick structure'.
Knowing the function of the phrase helps determine how it should be punctuated.
2
Locate the punctuation mark that introduces the parenthetical phrase.
The phrase begins with an em dash ('structure—a masterpiece...').
Nonessential phrases must be enclosed by matching punctuation marks (commas, parentheses, or dashes).
3
Determine the correct punctuation mark needed to close the parenthetical phrase.
Since the phrase began with a dash, it must be closed with a dash ('engineering—puzzled') to maintain consistency.
A mismatched closing punctuation mark (like a comma) is incorrect.
4
Verify that the main clause remains structurally complete.
The main clause 'The massive brick structure puzzled contemporary builders...' has a subject ('structure') and a verb ('puzzled') and is grammatically correct.
Ensuring the sentence does not become a fragment or run-on confirms the correct choice.

Key Concept

Matching Parenthetical Punctuation (Dashes)
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 56Question

The following passage is an essay about Marie Tharp and ocean mapping.

[1]
For decades, the consensus among geologists was that the ocean floor was a flat, featureless plain. In the early 1950s, Marie Tharp, a geologist and cartographer at Columbia University, set out to challenge this assumption. Working with raw topographic data collected by her colleague Bruce Heezen, Tharp spent years drafting detailed profiles of the Atlantic Ocean floor. Because women were barred from working on research vessels at the time, Tharp relied entirely on Heezen's sonar data, painstakingly hand-drawing the underwater landscapes.

[2]
As Tharp plotted the data points, she noticed a distinct V-shaped valley running down the center of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. She hypothesized that this feature was a rift valley, which would indicate that the ocean floor was spreading apart. This concept of continental drift was highly controversial and widely dismissed by the scientific community at the time. When Tharp first showed her findings to Heezen, he dismissed it as "girl talk." Undeterred, Tharp insisted on re-evaluating the data until Heezen was convinced, leading to their collaborative publication of the first physiographic map of the North Atlantic in 1957.

[3]
Tharp and Heezen's map revolutionized the field of earth science, providing visual evidence that supported the theory of plate tectonics. By showing that the ocean floor was dynamic and actively changing, their work transformed our understanding of how Earth's crust is formed and recycled. Today, Tharp is recognized not only for her monumental contributions to marine cartography but also as a pioneer who broke through the gender barriers of mid-century academia.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that profiles the collaborative relationship between Marie Tharp and Bruce Heezen, emphasizing their shared academic backgrounds and mutual career development. Would this essay fulfill that goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because the essay focuses primarily on Tharp's individual efforts to map the ocean floor and overcome professional obstacles, rather than profiling the academic backgrounds and mutual career development of both scientists.

Answer

No, because the essay focuses primarily on Tharp's individual efforts to map the ocean floor and overcome professional obstacles, rather than profiling the academic backgrounds and mutual career development of both scientists.
The correct answer is the option stating that the essay does not fulfill the goal because it focuses primarily on Tharp's individual efforts to map the ocean floor and overcome professional obstacles, rather than profiling the academic backgrounds and mutual career development of both scientists. The passage focuses on Tharp's individual role in interpreting the data, her struggles as a female scientist, and the significance of the resulting map. It does not provide information about Heezen's academic background, Tharp's academic background before Columbia, or their mutual career development.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the hypothetical goal stated in the prompt.
The goal is to write an essay that profiles the collaborative relationship between Marie Tharp and Bruce Heezen, specifically emphasizing their shared academic backgrounds and mutual career development.
This establishes the criteria by which we must evaluate the essay as a whole.
2
Analyze the passage to determine if it meets the criteria of the goal.
The passage details Marie Tharp's individual contributions, the gender barriers she faced, and the scientific impact of the map she made. While Heezen is mentioned as a colleague who collected the data and co-published the map, the essay does not discuss their shared academic backgrounds or mutual career development.
Comparing the actual content of the essay against the hypothetical goal helps determine if the essay is successful.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to find the one that correctly identifies the failure to meet the goal and provides the correct explanation.
The option stating that the essay does not fulfill the goal because it focuses primarily on Tharp's individual efforts and challenges rather than their shared backgrounds and mutual career development is correct.
This option correctly identifies both the direction (No) and the precise reason for the mismatch between the essay and the goal.

Key Concept

Evaluating whether an essay successfully fulfills a specific, hypothetical rhetorical goal by comparing the goal's requirements with the actual content of the passage.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 57Question

In 1856, eighteen-year-old chemist William Henry Perkin was attempting to synthesize quinine, a treatment for malaria, in his home laboratory in London. Instead of obtaining a clear drug, Perkin ended up with a dark, sludge-like residue. When he attempted to clean the flask with alcohol, the mixture turned a brilliant purple. Recognizing the potential of the vibrant hue, Perkin realized he had accidentally created the first synthetic organic dye, which he eventually named mauveine.

Prior to Perkin’s discovery, dyes were derived exclusively from natural sources like plants, insects, and minerals. Purple, historically harvested from the glands of Mediterranean sea snails, was so rare and expensive that it was reserved almost entirely for royalty. Mauveine transformed this landscape. Because it could be mass-produced in a laboratory at a fraction of the cost, purple fabric suddenly became accessible to the general public. Perkin quickly patented his process, secured financial backing, and built a factory to manufacture the dye, sparking a fashion craze across Europe.

Perkin’s success did more than just revolutionize fashion; it laid the foundation for the modern chemical industry. The methods used to synthesize mauveine demonstrated that valuable organic compounds could be engineered systematically from coal tar, a waste product of coal gas production. This breakthrough prompted researchers to develop synthetic colors, artificial pharmaceuticals, and new plastics. By transforming chemistry from a descriptive science to a creative, industrial enterprise, Perkin’s accidental residue reshaped the modern world.

Suppose the writer’s goal had been to write an essay demonstrating how an accidental laboratory discovery influenced both nineteenth-century European fashion and the trajectory of industrial chemistry. The essay successfully achieves this goal.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

The statement is true because the essay successfully describes the accidental discovery of mauveine, its impact on European fashion, and its role in launching the modern chemical industry.
The statement is correct because the essay systematically addresses all components of the specified goal: the accidental nature of the discovery, the resulting European fashion craze, and the foundation it laid for the modern chemical industry.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the proposed writing goal to identify the key elements required: (1) explaining how an accidental discovery was made, (2) showing its impact on nineteenth-century European fashion, and (3) showing its impact on industrial chemistry.
Three distinct criteria are established to evaluate the essay.
To evaluate the success of the essay, we must first break down the hypothetical goal into verifiable components.
2
Examine the passage to see if each identified element is addressed.
Paragraph 1 explains the accidental discovery of mauveine during an attempt to synthesize quinine. Paragraph 2 details the rise of mauveine in Europe, making purple fabric affordable and sparking a fashion craze. Paragraph 3 details how it laid the foundation for the industrial chemical industry, leading to synthetic pharmaceuticals and plastics.
Checking the text ensures that every part of the prompt's hypothetical goal is supported by the content.
3
Determine if the essay as a whole successfully achieves this goal based on the findings.
The essay successfully integrates and highlights all three elements, meaning the statement is true.
Since all components of the goal are thoroughly addressed and form the core narrative of the essay, the essay successfully achieves the goal.

Key Concept

Evaluating whether an essay successfully fulfills a specified rhetorical goal by analyzing the topic development across all paragraphs.
Question 58Question

Before the archivist could catalog the rare documents, she had to stabilize the brittle, yellowed, parchment sheets, and she worked under a fume hood to avoid inhaling mold spores.

Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: brittle, yellowed parchment sheets, and she worked

Answer

The correct choice is the one that correctly punctuates the coordinate adjectives 'brittle' and 'yellowed' with a comma between them, leaves the transition to the noun phrase 'parchment sheets' unpunctuated, and connects the two independent clauses using a comma followed by the coordinating conjunction 'and'.
The correct answer correctly places a comma between the coordinate adjectives 'brittle' and 'yellowed' because they independently modify 'parchment sheets' (which is a compound noun phrase where 'parchment' acts as a noun adjunct). It correctly omits a comma after 'yellowed' to avoid separating the adjective from the noun phrase it modifies. Finally, it uses a comma and the coordinating conjunction 'and' to connect the two independent clauses, which is grammatically correct.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify whether the adjectives 'brittle' and 'yellowed' are coordinate and determine how they modify 'parchment sheets'.
The adjectives 'brittle' and 'yellowed' can be reversed ('yellowed, brittle parchment sheets') and can be joined by 'and' ('brittle and yellowed'), which means they are coordinate and require a comma between them. However, no comma should separate the final adjective 'yellowed' from the noun phrase 'parchment sheets'.
Coordinate adjectives modifying the same noun must be separated by a comma, but a comma must never separate the final adjective from the noun it modifies.
2
Analyze the clause structure following 'parchment sheets' to determine the correct punctuation and conjunction needed to connect the clauses.
The sentence contains two independent clauses: 'she had to stabilize the... sheets' and 'she worked under a fume hood...'. These clauses can be joined by a comma and a coordinating conjunction ('and').
Connecting two independent clauses requires a comma and a coordinating conjunction, or a semicolon alone, to prevent run-ons and comma splices.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the one that avoids both coordinate adjective errors and clause boundary errors.
The choice that contains 'brittle, yellowed parchment sheets, and she worked' is correct because it correctly punctuates the adjectives and joins the independent clauses.
This option is the only one that avoids both the misplaced comma before the noun and grammatical errors like comma splices or fragments.

Key Concept

Commas with Lists, Clauses, and Coordinate Adjectives
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 59Question

[1] In 1910, French engineer Georges Claude introduced the neon lamp to the public at the Paris Motor Show, capitalizing on a byproduct of his air liquefaction business. [2] Claude had been searching for a way to utilize the abundant neon gas left over from producing pure oxygen for industrial applications. [3] He discovered that passing an electric current through the gas in a sealed glass tube produced a brilliant, luminous red light. [4] Under normal atmospheric conditions, neon is a colorless, odorless, and chemically inert monatomic gas. [5] Recognizing the advertising potential of his discovery, Claude soon sold the first commercial neon signs to a Parisian barber, launching a global industry that would permanently transform the nighttime aesthetics of modern cities.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 4 from the paragraph. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it shifts the paragraph's focus from the development and commercialization of Claude's invention to basic scientific facts about neon.

Answer

The sentence should be deleted because it shifts the paragraph's focus from the development and commercialization of Claude's invention to basic scientific facts about neon.
The correct option correctly identifies that Sentence 4 should be deleted because its focus on basic scientific facts about neon gas deviates from the paragraph's primary narrative about Georges Claude's invention and commercialization of the neon lamp.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph details the historical narrative of Georges Claude's development of the neon lamp and its commercial application as signage.
Understanding the paragraph's core purpose allows you to evaluate whether individual sentences contribute to or distract from that purpose.
2
Evaluate the function of Sentence 4 within the paragraph.
Sentence 4 provides basic chemical description of neon gas (colorless, odorless, inert, monatomic).
This determines if the sentence directly supports the narrative of invention and commercialization or if it introduces tangential information.
3
Compare the sentence's function with the paragraph's focus to make a keep/delete decision.
The sentence is tangential and interrupts the narrative flow, so it should be deleted.
Information that is superficially related to the topic (neon) but does not support the specific focus of the paragraph (Claude's business and invention) should be removed to maintain unity.
4
Select the option that matches the deletion decision and provides the correct rhetorical reason.
The option recommending deletion because the sentence shifts focus to basic scientific facts is the correct choice.
The other options either advocate keeping irrelevant information or provide incorrect justifications for deleting it.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 60Question

In 1873, tailor Jacob Davis and merchant Levi Strauss patented a new type of durable work pants. These pants featured copper rivets at points of strain, such as pocket corners, to prevent tearing. The rivets were manufactured in a small factory located in Maryland. The sturdy trousers, later known as blue jeans, quickly became popular among miners who needed clothing that would not rip during hard labor.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence from the passage. Should this sentence be deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it introduces a detail about the manufacturing location of the rivets that is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus on the design and popularity of the pants.

Answer

Yes, because it introduces a detail about the manufacturing location of the rivets that is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus on the design and popularity of the pants.
The correct option states that the sentence should be deleted because it introduces an irrelevant detail about where the rivets were manufactured. This detail does not support the paragraph's focus on the design, patenting, and popularity of the work pants.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on the patenting, design (copper rivets for durability), and popularity among miners of the new work pants.
Understanding the paragraph's topic is necessary to determine if the sentence in question is relevant.
2
Analyze the content of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence states where the copper rivets were manufactured (a small factory in Maryland).
This helps evaluate if the sentence directly supports the main topic or introduces a tangent.
3
Evaluate the relevance of the sentence and determine the correct decision.
The manufacturing location of the rivets does not contribute to explaining the pants' design or popularity. Therefore, the sentence is irrelevant and should be deleted.
Irrelevant details should be removed to maintain paragraph focus and cohesion.

Key Concept

Evaluating relevance when considering adding or deleting text in a passage.
Estimated Time:50s
PreviousPage 3 / 278Next