Comparing and Contrasting Multiple Experimental Designs

6 questions

Question 1Question

An investigator conducted two experiments to study the factors affecting the rate of a chemical reaction between zinc metal (Zn\text{Zn}) and hydrochloric acid (HCl\text{HCl}).

In Experiment 1, the investigator added 1.0 g1.0\text{ g} of zinc powder to 50 mL50\text{ mL} of 1.0 M1.0\text{ M} HCl\text{HCl} solution in a beaker. The reaction was carried out at different temperatures (20C20^\circ\text{C}, 30C30^\circ\text{C}, 40C40^\circ\text{C}, and 50C50^\circ\text{C}), and the time required for the zinc to completely dissolve was recorded for each trial.

In Experiment 2, the investigator added 1.0 g1.0\text{ g} of zinc powder to 50 mL50\text{ mL} of HCl\text{HCl} solution of different concentrations (0.5 M0.5\text{ M}, 1.0 M1.0\text{ M}, 1.5 M1.5\text{ M}, and 2.0 M2.0\text{ M}) in a beaker. The reaction was carried out at a constant temperature of 20C20^\circ\text{C}, and the time required for the zinc to completely dissolve was recorded for each trial.

Based on the descriptions of these experimental designs, is the statement that 'the temperature of the reaction was varied in Experiment 1 but was kept constant in Experiment 2' true or false?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

true
In Experiment 1, the investigator changed the temperature across trials (20C20^\circ\text{C}, 30C30^\circ\text{C}, 40C40^\circ\text{C}, and 50C50^\circ\text{C}), which means temperature was varied. In Experiment 2, the investigator maintained a constant temperature of 20C20^\circ\text{C} for all trials while varying the concentration of the acid. This directly confirms that temperature was varied in Experiment 1 and kept constant in Experiment 2, making the statement true.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the role of temperature in Experiment 1.
The temperature was set to 20C20^\circ\text{C}, 30C30^\circ\text{C}, 40C40^\circ\text{C}, and 50C50^\circ\text{C} across different trials, which means it was varied.
To identify if temperature was an independent variable or a constant in the first experimental design.
2
Analyze the role of temperature in Experiment 2.
The temperature was kept at 20C20^\circ\text{C} for all trials, which means it was kept constant.
To identify if temperature was an independent variable or a constant in the second experimental design.
3
Evaluate the statement using the findings from Steps 1 and 2.
The statement claims temperature was varied in Experiment 1 and kept constant in Experiment 2. Since this matches our analysis, the statement is true.
To determine the final truth value of the target statement.

Key Concept

Distinguishing between independent variables and controlled constants across multiple experimental setups.
Estimated Time:45s
Question 2Question

Students conducted two experiments to study the growth of *Arabidopsis thaliana* plants over a 30-day period.

Experiment 1
Five groups of 10 plants were grown in identical pots containing the same soil type. Each group received a different concentration of Fertilizer X (0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, or 4% by volume) dissolved in water. All plants were kept under continuous white light at a constant temperature of 22°C and watered daily with 50 mL of their respective solution. The average height of the plants in each group was measured at the end of 30 days.

Experiment 2
Five groups of 10 plants were grown under the same conditions as in Experiment 1, except that all plants received a 2% solution of Fertilizer X, and each group was exposed to a different color of light (blue, green, red, yellow, or white).

Based on the descriptions of the two experiments, which of the following variables was kept constant in Experiment 1 but was varied in Experiment 2?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The color of light the plants received

Answer

The color of light the plants received
The correct answer is the color of light the plants received. In Experiment 1, all plants were kept under continuous white light (a constant condition). In Experiment 2, the light color was the independent variable, meaning it was varied (blue, green, red, yellow, or white) across the different groups of plants.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the independent variable (what is varied) and the constants (what is kept the same) in Experiment 1.
In Experiment 1, the fertilizer concentration is varied (0% to 4%), while the light color (white light), soil type, temperature (22°C), watering volume (50 mL), and duration (30 days) are kept constant.
This establishes the control parameters and experimental variable for the first study.
2
Identify the independent variable and the constants in Experiment 2.
In Experiment 2, the light color is varied (blue, green, red, yellow, white), while the fertilizer concentration (2%), soil type, temperature, watering volume, and duration are kept constant.
This establishes the control parameters and experimental variable for the second study.
3
Compare the two sets of variables to find which condition is constant in Experiment 1 but varied in Experiment 2.
Light color is constant in Experiment 1 (white light) but varied in Experiment 2 (different colors).
This directly answers the comparative question asked in the stem.

Key Concept

Comparing and Contrasting Multiple Experimental Designs
Estimated Time:45s
Question 3Question

Experiment 1
Yeast suspensions were incubated in flasks containing 10%10\% solutions of three different sugars (glucose, sucrose, and lactose) at a constant temperature of 35C35^\circ\text{C}. The volume of carbon dioxide (CO2\text{CO}_2) gas produced was measured every 55 minutes for a total of 3030 minutes.

Experiment 2
Yeast suspensions were incubated in flasks containing a 10%10\% glucose solution at four different temperatures (15C15^\circ\text{C}, 25C25^\circ\text{C}, 35C35^\circ\text{C}, and 45C45^\circ\text{C}). The volume of CO2\text{CO}_2 gas produced was measured only once, exactly 3030 minutes after incubation began.

Statement to evaluate:
The two experiments differed in their independent variables (sugar type vs. temperature) and also in how the dependent variable (CO2\text{CO}_2 production) was monitored over time.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

True
The statement is correct because Experiment 1 manipulates sugar type (independent variable) and collects data dynamically at 55-minute intervals, while Experiment 2 manipulates temperature (independent variable) and collects a single endpoint data point at 3030 minutes.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify and compare the independent variables of both experiments.
In Experiment 1, the sugar type (glucose, sucrose, lactose) is varied, while in Experiment 2, the temperature (15C15^\circ\text{C}, 25C25^\circ\text{C}, 35C35^\circ\text{C}, 45C45^\circ\text{C}) is varied. These independent variables are different.
To determine if the independent variables differ between the experimental designs.
2
Identify and compare the methods of monitoring the dependent variable.
In Experiment 1, the volume of CO2\text{CO}_2 is measured repeatedly (every 55 minutes for 3030 minutes) to observe the rate of reaction. In Experiment 2, the volume is measured only once at the end (3030 minutes). These monitoring intervals/methods are different.
To determine if the method of tracking the dependent variable differs between the experimental designs.
3
Evaluate the statement based on the findings from steps 1 and 2.
Since both the independent variables and the monitoring protocols differ, the statement is correct.
To arrive at the final true/false evaluation.

Key Concept

Comparing and Contrasting Multiple Experimental Designs
Question 4Question

Students conducted two studies to investigate heat conduction in metal rods. In both studies, a wax bead was placed at one end of a metal rod, and the other end was heated using a Bunsen burner. The time required for the wax bead to melt was recorded.

Study 1
Rods of copper, aluminum, and iron, all with a length of 15 cm15\text{ cm} and a diameter of 0.5 cm0.5\text{ cm}, were tested. The flame height of the burner was kept constant at 3 cm3\text{ cm}.

Study 2
Copper rods with a diameter of 0.5 cm0.5\text{ cm} and lengths of 10 cm10\text{ cm}, 20 cm20\text{ cm}, and 30 cm30\text{ cm} were tested. The flame height of the burner was kept constant at 3 cm3\text{ cm}.

Which of the following statements best describes a difference between the experimental designs of Study 1 and Study 2?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Study 1 varied the material of the rods while keeping their length constant, whereas Study 2 varied the length of the rods while keeping their material constant.

Answer

Study 1 varied the material of the rods while keeping their length constant, whereas Study 2 varied the length of the rods while keeping their material constant.
In Study 1, the type of metal (copper, aluminum, iron) was varied while keeping the length of the rods constant at 15 cm15\text{ cm}. In Study 2, the length of the copper rods was varied (10 cm10\text{ cm}, 20 cm20\text{ cm}, 30 cm30\text{ cm}) while keeping the material constant (copper). Thus, the correct answer correctly identifies that Study 1 varied the material with constant length, whereas Study 2 varied the length with constant material.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the independent variable (what is changed) in Study 1.
The rod material (copper, aluminum, iron) is varied, while rod length (15 cm15\text{ cm}), diameter (0.5 cm0.5\text{ cm}), and flame height (3 cm3\text{ cm}) are kept constant.
Understanding the design of Study 1 requires identifying which parameters are systematically changed and which are controlled.
2
Identify the independent variable (what is changed) in Study 2.
The rod length (10 cm10\text{ cm}, 20 cm20\text{ cm}, 30 cm30\text{ cm}) is varied, while rod material (copper), diameter (0.5 cm0.5\text{ cm}), and flame height (3 cm3\text{ cm}) are kept constant.
Understanding the design of Study 2 requires identifying which parameters are systematically changed and which are controlled.
3
Compare the independent and constant variables between the two designs to find the differences.
Study 1 changes the material while keeping length constant; Study 2 changes the length while keeping material constant.
Comparing the designs reveals how they target different variables to isolate their respective effects on heat conduction time.

Key Concept

Comparing and Contrasting Multiple Experimental Designs
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 5Question

To investigate the factors affecting the rate of transpiration in plants, students set up two distinct experiments using identical bean plants.

In Experiment 1, three plants were placed in separate chambers with varying levels of relative humidity (30%30\%, 50%50\%, and 70%70\%) at a constant temperature of 22C22^\circ\text{C} and a constant light intensity of 800 lux800\text{ lux}. The mass of water lost by each plant was measured after 6 hours.

In Experiment 2, three plants were placed in separate chambers at varying temperatures (18C18^\circ\text{C}, 24C24^\circ\text{C}, and 30C30^\circ\text{C}) at a constant relative humidity of 50%50\% and a constant light intensity of 800 lux800\text{ lux}. The mass of water lost by each plant was measured after 6 hours.

Determine whether the following statement is true or false:

The relative humidity of the environment in Experiment 2 was held constant at a value that was also tested as an experimental condition in Experiment 1.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

The statement is true because the constant relative humidity of 50% in Experiment 2 is one of the three relative humidity levels (30%, 50%, and 70%) tested as an independent variable in Experiment 1.
The statement is correct because the relative humidity in Experiment 2 is kept constant at 50%, which is one of the three relative humidity conditions (30%, 50%, and 70%) evaluated in Experiment 1.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the relative humidity levels tested in Experiment 1.
The relative humidity levels tested in Experiment 1 are 30%30\%, 50%50\%, and 70%70\%.
These values represent the independent variable conditions for Experiment 1.
2
Identify the relative humidity conditions maintained in Experiment 2.
The relative humidity in Experiment 2 is held constant at 50%50\%.
Relative humidity is a controlled variable (constant) in Experiment 2.
3
Compare the constant relative humidity value from Experiment 2 to the levels tested in Experiment 1.
The constant value of 50%50\% in Experiment 2 matches the middle level (50%50\%) tested in Experiment 1.
This comparison directly evaluates the truth value of the statement.

Key Concept

Comparing independent variables and controlled constants across multiple experimental designs
Question 6Question

Students conducted two experiments to study the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2H_2O_2) into water and oxygen gas (O2O_2) in the presence of a yeast catalyst suspension.

Experiment 1
A test tube was filled with 10 mL10\text{ mL} of 3%3\% H2O2H_2O_2 solution. A yeast suspension with a concentration of 1.0 g/L1.0\text{ g/L} was prepared. The students added 1 mL1\text{ mL} of the yeast suspension to the test tube at a temperature of 25C25^\circ\text{C} and measured the volume of O2O_2 gas produced over 5 minutes5\text{ minutes}. This procedure was repeated at temperatures of 35C35^\circ\text{C}, 45C45^\circ\text{C}, and 55C55^\circ\text{C}.

Experiment 2
Using the same apparatus at a constant temperature of 35C35^\circ\text{C}, the students added 1 mL1\text{ mL} of yeast suspensions of varying concentrations (0.5 g/L0.5\text{ g/L}, 1.0 g/L1.0\text{ g/L}, 1.5 g/L1.5\text{ g/L}, and 2.0 g/L2.0\text{ g/L}) to separate test tubes, each containing 10 mL10\text{ mL} of 3%3\% H2O2H_2O_2 solution. The volume of O2O_2 gas produced was measured over 5 minutes5\text{ minutes}.

Based on the experimental designs described, is the statement that the concentration of the yeast suspension served as the independent variable in Experiment 1 and as a controlled variable in Experiment 2 true or false?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: False

Answer

False
The correct answer is false because the roles of the variables are reversed in the statement. In Experiment 1, the concentration of the yeast suspension was maintained constant at 1.0 g/L1.0\text{ g/L} (making it a controlled variable), whereas in Experiment 2, the concentration of the yeast suspension was varied (making it the independent variable).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the independent variable (the factor changed by the investigator) and the controlled variables (factors kept constant) in Experiment 1.
In Experiment 1, the temperature was varied (25C25^\circ\text{C}, 35C35^\circ\text{C}, 45C45^\circ\text{C}, and 55C55^\circ\text{C}), which means temperature is the independent variable. The yeast suspension concentration was kept constant at 1.0 g/L1.0\text{ g/L}, which means it is a controlled variable.
Understanding the design of Experiment 1 requires categorizing the variables correctly.
2
Identify the independent variable and the controlled variables in Experiment 2.
In Experiment 2, the temperature was held constant at 35C35^\circ\text{C} (controlled variable), while the concentration of the yeast suspension was varied (0.5 g/L0.5\text{ g/L}, 1.0 g/L1.0\text{ g/L}, 1.5 g/L1.5\text{ g/L}, and 2.0 g/L2.0\text{ g/L}), making it the independent variable.
Understanding the design of Experiment 2 requires categorizing its variables correctly.
3
Compare the roles of the yeast concentration variable in both experiments to the proposed statement.
The statement claims that yeast concentration was the independent variable in Experiment 1 and the controlled variable in Experiment 2. Since Experiment 1 kept yeast concentration constant (controlled variable) and Experiment 2 varied it (independent variable), the statement is incorrect. The correct answer is false.
Comparing the actual experimental roles to the statement determines its truth value.

Key Concept

Comparing and Contrasting Multiple Experimental Designs
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Comparing and Contrasting Multiple Experimental Designs Practice Questions — ACT | Examkin