Examkin

Presentational Writing: Argumentative Essay

13 questions

All types13Multiple choice9Ordering2Short answer2
Question 1Question →

A high school student is refining the conclusion of an argumentative essay about space exploration and needs to elevate the academic tone of the sentence below:

"Para asegurar el progreso continuo de estas misiones, es esencial que el comité internacional __les da permiso a las empresas para meterse en el proyecto y así no gastar un dineral__."

Which of the following replacements for the underlined text best demonstrates the formal register and grammatical structures expected in an academic essay?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: autorice la participación del sector privado en el proyecto para así optimizar los recursos financieros

Answer

The revision that correctly uses the subjunctive mood ('autorice') and maintains formal academic vocabulary throughout the clause.
The correct answer properly applies the subjunctive mood ('autorice') triggered by the impersonal expression 'es esencial que'. Furthermore, it demonstrates a strong command of formal register by replacing the colloquial 'meterse' and 'no gastar un dineral' with sophisticated academic terminology ('participación del sector privado' and 'optimizar los recursos financieros').

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the grammatical structure of the sentence immediately preceding the underlined portion.
The phrase 'es esencial que' is an impersonal expression that requires the subordinate clause to be formulated in the subjunctive mood.
Identifying grammatical triggers is necessary to eliminate options that use the incorrect verb mood.
2
Evaluate the main verb forms provided in the answer choices.
Two options use the correct subjunctive form ('autorice'), while two options incorrectly use the indicative form ('autoriza').
This step eliminates the indicative options regardless of their vocabulary, as grammatical accuracy is a baseline requirement.
3
Analyze the remaining options for appropriate academic register and vocabulary.
The option containing 'se metan' and 'gastar una fortuna' is too colloquial. The correct option elevates the language by using 'participación del sector privado' and 'optimizar los recursos financieros'.
Argumentative essays require formal, sophisticated vocabulary and must avoid conversational phrasing or slang.

Key Concept

Formal Register and the Subjunctive Mood in Academic Writing
Question 2Question →

A student is writing an AP Spanish argumentative essay responding to the prompt: 'Should urban centers ban personal vehicles?' The student's thesis is: 'Vehicle bans ultimately benefit cities both environmentally and economically.' They must integrate the following sources:

- Fuente 1 (Print Article): Argues that while pedestrian zones improve air quality, they often cause immediate financial losses for local businesses.
- Fuente 2 (Audio Interview): A mayor explains that despite initial protests, his city experienced a 20% increase in local business revenue a year after banning cars.

The student's current draft in Spanish merely summarizes the sources without connecting them to the argument:
*"La Fuente 1 explica que prohibir los vehículos ayuda al medio ambiente pero daña la economía local. Por otro lado, en la Fuente 2, el alcalde dice que en su ciudad la economía mejoró un 20%."*

Which of the following revisions best synthesizes these sources to support the thesis, rather than just summarizing them?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The revision that uses a concessive clause to place the sources in dialogue: "Aunque la Fuente 1 advierte sobre las posibles pérdidas económicas, la experiencia del alcalde (Fuente 2) refuta este temor, demostrando que los ingresos comerciales pueden aumentar un 20%."

Answer

The revision that uses a concessive clause to place the sources in dialogue: "Aunque la Fuente 1 advierte sobre las posibles pérdidas económicas, la experiencia del alcalde (Fuente 2) refuta este temor..."
The correct answer successfully synthesizes the information by placing the two sources in direct conversation. It uses a concessive clause ('Aunque la Fuente 1...') to acknowledge the print source's economic concerns, and then immediately integrates the audio source ('la experiencia del alcalde...') to refute those concerns. Furthermore, it accurately cites both sources, demonstrating a high-level integration that directly supports the student's thesis.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the student's thesis and the content of both sources.
The thesis argues that vehicle bans are economically beneficial. Fuente 1 claims they harm the economy, while Fuente 2 (audio) claims they boost the economy by 20%.
Understanding the relationship between the sources is necessary to evaluate which synthesis best supports the argument.
2
Evaluate the options for true synthesis rather than mere summary.
Options that list 'First, Source 1 says X. Second, Source 2 says Y' are summaries. True synthesis places the sources in conversation to create a new, unified point.
The AP rubric requires synthesis, which involves analytical connections between texts.
3
Verify that the chosen synthesis includes proper citation and addresses all relevant sources.
The correct revision acknowledges the print source's concern (Fuente 1) and uses the audio source's data (Fuente 2) to refute it, citing both accurately.
Effective synthesis requires both accurate attribution and the integration of multiple pieces of evidence.

Key Concept

Synthesizing Print and Audio Sources in Argumentative Writing
Question 3Question →

A student is drafting an argumentative essay about the economic effects of sustainable tourism on local communities. The student is synthesizing the following three sources:

Source 1 (Print Article): Argues that sustainable tourism stimulates long-term economic growth for regions, but acknowledges that the transition requires substantial initial capital investment.
Source 2 (Audio Interview): A local artisan explains that small, family-owned businesses cannot afford the high costs of sustainable certification, resulting in them being pushed out of the market by large, corporate hotel chains.
Source 3 (Data Table):
MetricYear 1Year 5
Total Regional Tourism Revenue$100 Million$140 Million
Revenue Share for Local Businesses60%45%

The student's current draft reads:
'Sustainable tourism provides economic benefits but is very expensive. Source 1 states that it helps the regional economy grow. However, Source 2 mentions that the costs are too high for small businesses. Furthermore, Source 3 shows that the local business revenue share dropped to 45%.'

Which of the following revisions best synthesizes the sources to support a cohesive argument about the nuanced economic impact on local communities?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Although sustainable tourism stimulates overall regional economic growth (Source 1), the prohibitive transition costs highlighted by local artisans (Source 2) inadvertently facilitate corporate consolidation, explaining why the local businesses' market share dropped to 45% even as total revenue surged (Source 3).

Answer

The revision that integrates the prohibitive costs, the corporate takeover, and the contrasting revenue data into a single cause-and-effect argument.
The correct revision demonstrates true synthesis by putting the sources in conversation with each other. It uses the audio source's detail about corporate consolidation to explain the contrast found in the data table (overall growth but declining local share), creating a complex, unified argument.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core argument and unique contribution of each source.
Source 1 focuses on overall growth vs. high capital needs. Source 2 identifies who is hurt by high costs (small businesses) and who benefits (corporate chains). Source 3 provides quantitative evidence of this shift (overall revenue up 40%, but local share down from 60% to 45%).
Understanding the specific evidence provided by each source is a prerequisite for advanced synthesis.
2
Evaluate the student's current draft.
The draft merely lists the sources sequentially (summarizing) without drawing connections between them to build a unified argument.
Identifying the structural flaw in the current draft helps determine what a successful revision must accomplish.
3
Examine the options for true synthesis rather than summary or misinterpretation.
The correct option connects the high costs (Source 1) to the corporate takeover (Source 2), using this relationship to explain the nuanced, contradictory data (Source 3) where total revenue increases while local share decreases.
Synthesis requires combining disparate pieces of information to form a new, cohesive understanding.

Key Concept

Synthesizing multiple viewpoints and data sources to construct a cohesive argument
Question 4Question →

A student draft of an AP Spanish argumentative essay contains the following sentence:

"Para combatir el cambio climático a nivel global, es imprescindible que los gobiernos *pongan mucha plata en cosas verdes*."

Which of the following phrases best replaces the italicized segment to maintain a formal, academic register and demonstrate grammatical accuracy?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: inviertan recursos sustanciales en iniciativas ecológicas

Answer

The phrase stating 'inviertan recursos sustanciales en iniciativas ecológicas' is the correct answer.
The correct answer successfully uses the subjunctive mood ('inviertan'), which is strictly required after the impersonal expression 'es imprescindible que'. Furthermore, it employs precise, formal academic vocabulary ('recursos sustanciales', 'iniciativas ecológicas') that perfectly matches the objective, elevated tone expected in an argumentative essay.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the grammatical context of the original sentence.
The phrase 'es imprescindible que' is an impersonal expression of necessity that requires the subordinate verb to be in the subjunctive mood.
Identifying the grammatical trigger allows you to eliminate options that incorrectly use the indicative mood.
2
Evaluate the vocabulary and register of the remaining options.
An argumentative essay requires an objective, formal academic register. This means colloquial expressions (like 'un montón de') and informal pronouns (like 'tú') must be avoided.
Maintaining a consistent formal register is a core requirement for AP Spanish presentational writing.
3
Select the option that satisfies both grammatical and stylistic requirements.
The phrase utilizing 'inviertan recursos sustanciales' applies the correct subjunctive conjugation and elevates the vocabulary to an academic standard.
This is the only choice that resolves both the grammar and register issues in the original draft.

Key Concept

Maintaining formal academic register and grammatical accuracy in argumentative writing
Question 5Question →

Read the following AP-style argumentative essay context and source summaries.

Theme: The impact of ecotourism in Latin America.
Essay Prompt: 'El ecoturismo en América Latina: ¿Representa un beneficio económico sostenible o una amenaza ambiental y cultural para las comunidades locales?'

Source Summaries:
- Source 1 (Article): Highlights that ecotourism creates local jobs and provides necessary funding for local communities.
- Source 2 (Table): Demonstrates a direct correlation between tourist foot traffic and environmental water degradation.
- Source 3 (Audio): An indigenous leader states that traditional cultural practices are being commercialized and destroyed.

Your task is to draft a formal, one-sentence thesis statement in Spanish that takes a nuanced position. Your thesis must acknowledge the economic benefits (Source 1) but ultimately argue that the environmental and cultural damages (Sources 2 and 3) are more significant.

To allow for standardized grading, complete the following Spanish sentence by translating the bracketed concepts into formal Spanish (use exactly two words for each bracketed concept).

'Aunque el ecoturismo proporciona [economic benefits], en última instancia es una amenaza que causa [environmental damage] y [cultural loss].'

Write the COMPLETE sentence in Spanish as your answer.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Aunque el ecoturismo proporciona beneficios económicos, en última instancia es una amenaza que causa daño ambiental y pérdida cultural.; Aunque el ecoturismo proporciona ventajas económicas, en última instancia es una amenaza que causa impacto ambiental y pérdida cultural.; Aunque el ecoturismo proporciona desarrollo económico, en última instancia es una amenaza que causa daño medioambiental y pérdida cultural.

Answer

Aunque el ecoturismo proporciona beneficios económicos, en última instancia es una amenaza que causa daño ambiental y pérdida cultural.
The completed sentence successfully formulates a nuanced thesis by using the concession conjunction 'Aunque' to acknowledge the economic counter-argument (Source 1), followed by a strong main clause that synthesizes the environmental and cultural threats (Sources 2 and 3). The vocabulary used ('beneficios económicos', 'daño ambiental', 'pérdida cultural') perfectly matches the required formal academic register.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the source summaries to determine the required arguments for the thesis.
Source 1 provides the counter-argument (economic benefits). Sources 2 and 3 provide the main arguments (environmental damage and cultural loss).
A strong AP-level thesis must synthesize all provided sources.
2
Translate the first bracketed concept '[economic benefits]' into formal Spanish.
The standard translation is 'beneficios económicos'.
This completes the concession clause started by 'Aunque' (Although) to acknowledge the opposing view.
3
Translate the remaining bracketed concepts '[environmental damage]' and '[cultural loss]'.
Translations: 'daño ambiental' (or 'impacto ambiental') and 'pérdida cultural'.
These terms accurately summarize the negative impacts highlighted in Sources 2 and 3 using formal academic register.
4
Assemble the final sentence.
Aunque el ecoturismo proporciona beneficios económicos, en última instancia es una amenaza que causa daño ambiental y pérdida cultural.
This creates a cohesive, nuanced thesis statement that explicitly outlines the arguments.

Key Concept

Synthesizing sources to formulate a nuanced thesis statement
Question 6Question →

Read the following excerpt from a student's draft of an argumentative essay regarding artificial intelligence in education:

"Al evaluar la integración de la inteligencia artificial en el entorno académico, es súper importante que los maestros entienden las limitaciones éticas de estas nuevas herramientas."

Which of the following best replaces the bolded segment to maintain a formal academic register and demonstrate correct grammatical structure?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: es fundamental que los educadores comprendan

Answer

The correct answer is the phrase that uses formal vocabulary and the present subjunctive mood: 'es fundamental que los educadores comprendan'.
The correct answer replaces the colloquial intensifier ('súper importante') with formal academic vocabulary ('fundamental') and correctly uses the present subjunctive mood ('comprendan'), which is strictly required after an impersonal expression of necessity.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the bolded segment for vocabulary and register issues.
The phrase 'súper importante' is highly colloquial and inappropriate for a formal argumentative essay.
Academic writing requires elevated, objective vocabulary rather than conversational slang.
2
Analyze the grammatical structure of the bolded segment.
The phrase uses the indicative verb 'entienden' following an impersonal expression of importance.
Impersonal expressions indicating necessity, importance, or value (e.g., 'es importante que') require the subjunctive mood in the subordinate clause.
3
Evaluate the options to find the one that resolves both the register and grammar errors.
The phrase 'es fundamental que los educadores comprendan' elevates the vocabulary and correctly uses the subjunctive mood.
It replaces the colloquialism with a formal equivalent and shifts the dependent verb to the correct mood without introducing improper pronouns.

Key Concept

Formal Register, Academic Vocabulary, and Subjunctive Mood
Question 7Question →

An AP Spanish student is writing an argumentative essay about the impact of artificial intelligence on traditional Latin American crafts. They must synthesize three provided sources:

- Source 1 (Print Article): Argues that AI makes art creation accessible to the masses but economically marginalizes traditional artisans.
- Source 2 (Graph): Shows a steady 40% decline in the income of traditional weavers in Oaxaca over the last five years, alongside a sharp rise in digital art sales.
- Source 3 (Audio Interview): Features an indigenous artisan stating that while technology is inevitable, true art requires a human 'soul' and ancestral knowledge passed down through generations.

The student wants to write a synthesized paragraph that argues the following thesis: 'Despite the severe economic disruption caused by AI, the cultural essence of traditional crafts makes them irreplaceable.'

Which of the following revisions best synthesizes the sources to support this thesis, rather than merely summarizing them?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Although technological democratization has reconfigured the market—dramatically reducing the income of Oaxacan weavers in favor of digital art (Sources 1 and 2)—artificial intelligence can never emulate the ancestral heritage and 'soul' that give traditional art its incalculable value (Source 3).

Answer

The revision that places the economic disruption in a concession clause (combining Sources 1 and 2) and uses the cultural essence (Source 3) as the main argument.
The correct revision successfully integrates all three sources into a single, cohesive argument. It synthesizes the print and graphic data (Sources 1 and 2) to establish the economic counterargument in a concession clause, and leverages the audio source (Source 3) to assert the main thesis regarding cultural irreplaceability. The sources converse with one another to prove the student's point rather than being listed sequentially.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the student's thesis and the requirements of true synthesis.
The thesis requires acknowledging the economic disruption (Sources 1 and 2) while emphasizing the irreplaceability of cultural essence (Source 3). Synthesis requires combining these sources into a unified argument, not just listing them.
Understanding the goal is essential before evaluating the revisions.
2
Evaluate the option beginning with 'It is evident that...'
This option sequentially lists what each source says ('Source 1 argues...', 'Additionally, Source 2...', 'In contrast, Source 3...').
This is a mere summary of sources, lacking the conceptual integration required for synthesis.
3
Evaluate the option beginning with 'The undeniable democratization...'
This option effectively synthesizes Sources 1 and 2 but completely omits Source 3 (the audio interview) and fails to address the irreplaceability aspect of the thesis.
A successful synthesis must integrate the audio evidence and fully support the intended thesis.
4
Evaluate the option beginning with 'Given that authentic art...'
This option combines the sources but misinterprets Source 1 and Source 2, falsely claiming that AI democratized ancestral techniques and increased the financial success of traditional works.
Accurate interpretation of graphic and print data is mandatory for valid synthesis.
5
Evaluate the option beginning with 'Although technological democratization...'
This option combines Sources 1 and 2 into a concession clause about economic disruption, and uses Source 3 as the main independent clause to prove the crafts are irreplaceable.
This demonstrates advanced synthesis by placing the sources in conversation to build a cohesive argument that perfectly matches the thesis.

Key Concept

Synthesizing Print, Graphic, and Audio Sources into a Cohesive Argument
Question 8Question →

You are preparing to write an AP Spanish Language argumentative essay. Read the following theme and source summaries.

Theme: The implementation of mandatory public service for young adults.
Source 1 (Article): Argues that mandatory public service builds national unity and civic responsibility among youth.
Source 2 (Table): Demonstrates that countries with mandatory service programs have higher rates of long-term community volunteerism.
Source 3 (Audio): A sociologist argues that mandatory service delays higher education and entry into the workforce, imposing an economic burden on young adults.

Draft a complete, single-sentence thesis statement in English that establishes a clear, nuanced position on whether governments should implement mandatory public service. Your thesis MUST acknowledge the economic drawbacks mentioned in the audio source while ultimately defending the implementation of the program based on the benefits highlighted in the article and table.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Although mandatory public service may delay entry into the workforce and impose economic burdens on young adults, governments should implement these programs because they significantly foster national unity and long-term civic responsibility.; While implementing mandatory public service can cause economic delays for youth, the long-term benefits of national unity and community volunteerism make it a necessary policy for governments to adopt.; Despite the potential economic burdens and delays in higher education, mandatory public service should be required by governments to build a stronger sense of national unity and civic duty among young adults.

Answer

A valid thesis statement must contain a concession clause addressing the economic burdens (Source 3) and a main clause defending the program based on civic benefits (Sources 1 and 2). Example: 'Although mandatory public service may impose economic burdens on young adults, governments should implement these programs because they significantly foster national unity and long-term civic responsibility.'
A strong, nuanced thesis for an AP argumentative essay must clearly state the writer's position while demonstrating an understanding of multiple perspectives. By using a concession clause (e.g., starting with 'Although' or 'While') to address the economic and educational drawbacks from the audio source, and a main clause to defend the civic benefits from the article and table, the thesis effectively synthesizes the sources and establishes a definitive, defensible stance that perfectly aligns with the prompt's requirements.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt and the provided sources.
Identify the main topic (mandatory public service) and the competing perspectives: civic benefits (Sources 1 and 2) versus economic and educational drawbacks (Source 3).
Understanding the source material is required to synthesize the information into a cohesive argument.
2
Determine the required position for the thesis.
The instructions specifically require a nuanced position that acknowledges the drawbacks but ultimately defends the implementation of the program.
Following the prompt's specific directives ensures the thesis addresses the required task.
3
Draft the concession clause.
Create a dependent clause using a subordinating conjunction (e.g., 'Although', 'While', 'Despite') to acknowledge the delayed education and economic burdens highlighted in Source 3.
A concession clause effectively demonstrates an understanding of the counterargument, establishing a nuanced position.
4
Draft the main argument clause.
Create an independent clause clearly stating that governments should implement the program due to the national unity and civic responsibility highlighted in Sources 1 and 2.
This establishes the definitive stance required for an argumentative essay.
5
Combine the clauses into a single sentence.
Formulate a single, grammatically correct sentence that seamlessly connects the concession and the main argument.
A strong thesis statement is typically a concise, single sentence that maps out the entire essay's trajectory.

Key Concept

Formulating a nuanced thesis statement that synthesizes multiple sources and establishes a clear, defensible position.
Question 9Question →

Arrange the following sentences in the correct order to form a logically structured and cohesive body paragraph for an argumentative essay about the implementation of a four-day workweek.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct logical sequence is: topic sentence (the main claim), supporting evidence (the cited study), synthesis of the evidence (analysis of the data), and a concluding thought.
A highly cohesive body paragraph in an argumentative essay follows a strict structural progression. First, it establishes a clear claim (the topic sentence starting with 'Por un lado'). Next, it integrates external source material as evidence ('Según un estudio...'). Crucially, the writer must then synthesize that evidence and explain its relevance in their own words ('Estos datos sugieren...'). Finally, the paragraph should close with a concluding thought that summarizes the impact and prepares for the next transition ('En consecuencia...').

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the topic sentence that establishes the foundation of the paragraph.
The sentence beginning with 'Por un lado...' introduces the paragraph's main argument regarding productivity.
A well-structured argumentative paragraph must begin with a clear, broad claim before introducing specific data.
2
Locate the evidence that directly supports the initial claim.
The sentence beginning with 'Según un estudio...' provides specific cited data (a 65% decrease in sick days).
Evidence and source integration must directly follow and substantiate the claim.
3
Find the synthesis or explanation of the provided evidence.
The sentence beginning with 'Estos datos sugieren...' interprets the study's findings.
In strong essays, evidence must be synthesized, not just summarized. The phrase 'Estos datos' creates a mandatory logical link to the previous statistics.
4
Identify the concluding sentence that closes the paragraph's thought process.
The sentence beginning with 'En consecuencia...' wraps up the paragraph's point.
A strong body paragraph ends with a concluding thought that connects the synthesized evidence back to the broader argument or thesis.

Key Concept

Logical progression of an argumentative body paragraph (Claim, Evidence, Synthesis, Conclusion).
Question 10Question →

In an argumentative essay about bilingual education, an author must integrate information from a print article and an audio interview. The print article (Source 1) details the cognitive benefits of bilingualism, emphasizing improved problem-solving skills. The audio interview (Source 2) features a teacher discussing how bilingual classrooms foster cultural empathy.

The current draft paragraph reads:
"According to the print article, bilingual students develop better problem-solving skills. Additionally, the teacher in the audio interview notes that these programs build cultural empathy."

Which of the following is the most effective revision to synthesize the sources rather than simply summarize them sequentially?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Bilingual education promotes comprehensive student development by simultaneously advancing cognitive abilities, such as problem-solving (Source 1), and interpersonal skills, like cultural empathy (Source 2).

Answer

The revision that unites both cognitive and interpersonal benefits under the broader theme of comprehensive student development while maintaining accurate citations for both sources.
The correct answer effectively synthesizes the material by introducing a broader analytical concept ('comprehensive student development') and using both sources as distinct pieces of evidence to support this new overarching claim. Furthermore, it strictly adheres to citation requirements.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the provided draft and the prompt's requirement.
The goal is to transition from summarizing two separate points independently to synthesizing them into a cohesive argumentative claim.
True synthesis requires finding common ground or a broader theme that logically connects the provided sources.
2
Evaluate the core concepts of both sources to identify a unifying theme.
Source 1 focuses on cognitive development (problem-solving), and Source 2 focuses on social development (cultural empathy). The overarching theme that encompasses both is holistic or comprehensive student development.
Identifying the relationship between the sources is the foundation of effective synthesis.
3
Review the options to find the one that combines these ideas under the unifying theme with proper formatting.
The correct revision explicitly links both benefits to comprehensive student development and correctly includes citations (Source 1 and Source 2).
AP Spanish writing rubrics require both conceptual integration and precise source attribution.

Key Concept

Source Synthesis and Integration
Question 11Question →

A student is writing an argumentative essay on the implementation of a four-day work week. They must integrate information from two sources: an article (Source 1) that highlights how a shorter work week significantly reduces employee burnout, and an audio interview (Source 2) where a corporate manager notes that while workers are happier, overall company output initially decreases before stabilizing.

Here is a draft of the student's body paragraph:
"According to the article in Source 1, working fewer days significantly reduces employee burnout and improves mental well-being. The audio interview in Source 2 features a manager who mentions that company productivity decreases at first but eventually balances out. This shows that the four-day work week has mixed results."

Which of the following revisions best improves this paragraph by synthesizing the sources to support a cohesive argument, rather than merely summarizing them?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: While Source 2 points out a temporary drop in initial company output, the significant reduction in employee burnout described in Source 1 demonstrates that a four-day work week is ultimately a sustainable model for businesses.

Answer

The revision that uses a concessive clause to contrast the temporary drop in output (Source 2) with the long-term reduction in burnout (Source 1) to argue that the model is sustainable.
The correct revision actively puts the two sources in conversation. By using a contrasting transition, it acknowledges the challenge presented in the audio source and weighs it against the benefit presented in the print source, ultimately using both to support a strong analytical claim.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the student's original draft paragraph.
The draft presents a summary of Source 1 followed by a summary of Source 2, ending with a weak, non-argumentative conclusion.
Identifying the current flaw (summarizing instead of synthesizing) is necessary to determine the appropriate revision.
2
Evaluate the options for proper synthesis and source attribution.
The correct revision must mention both sources, combine their distinct points into a unified sentence or logical flow, and support a clear argumentative stance.
Synthesis requires putting sources in conversation with each other rather than listing them in isolation.

Key Concept

Synthesizing multiple sources to construct a cohesive argument
Question 12Question →

Determine the most logical sequence for the following sentences to construct a cohesive and effective introductory paragraph for an argumentative essay regarding school uniform policies.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct order logically progresses from a broad hook, to specific background context, to a transitional sentence introducing differing viewpoints, and finally concludes with a clear thesis statement.
The correct sequence follows the standard deductive structure for an argumentative essay introduction: starting with a broad hook to engage the reader, providing specific context to frame the topic, introducing the ongoing debate with source references to establish credibility, and culminating in a clear, arguable thesis statement that anchors the entire essay.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the broadest statement that serves as a hook for the reader.
The sentence starting with 'In recent years, the tension...' introduces the general theme of expression versus discipline.
An effective introduction begins broadly to engage the reader before narrowing to the specific topic.
2
Locate the sentence that provides specific context for the current debate.
The sentence starting with 'Many school districts...' narrows the focus to the specific issue of standardized dress codes.
Background context is necessary to explain why the hook's broad theme is currently relevant and being discussed.
3
Find the transition sentence that introduces the differing viewpoints and references sources.
The sentence starting with 'While proponents argue...' presents both sides of the issue.
This bridges the background context to the author's specific claim by acknowledging the existing academic conversation.
4
Identify the thesis statement that presents a clear, defensible position.
The sentence starting with 'Ultimately, public high schools...' states the author's specific argument and rationale.
The thesis must conclude the introduction, serving as a structural roadmap for the rest of the essay.

Key Concept

Introductory Paragraph Structure and Thesis Formulation
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 13Question →

A student is reviewing a draft of an argumentative essay about the transition to renewable energy. Read the following sentence from the draft:

"Para garantizar un futuro sostenible, es crucial que la sociedad cambia sus hábitos de consumo y que tú apoyes las iniciativas ecológicas."

Which of the following best replaces the underlined segment "cambia sus hábitos de consumo y que tú apoyes" to maintain an appropriate academic register and correct grammatical structure?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: cambie sus patrones de consumo y que la población apoye

Answer

The option that reads "cambie sus patrones de consumo y que la población apoye" is the correct replacement.
The correct response successfully addresses both errors in the original draft. First, it changes the indicative 'cambia' to the subjunctive 'cambie', which is grammatically required after 'es crucial que'. Second, it replaces the informal direct address 'tú apoyes' with 'la población apoye', elevating the vocabulary and maintaining the objective, third-person register appropriate for an academic essay.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the grammatical requirements of the main clause.
The phrase 'es crucial que' is an impersonal expression that triggers the use of the subjunctive mood in the subordinate clause.
Impersonal expressions indicating necessity or importance require the subjunctive mood to express recommendations or hypothetical actions.
2
Evaluate the first verb in the underlined segment.
The verb 'cambia' is in the indicative mood and must be changed to the subjunctive form 'cambie'.
This corrects the grammatical error triggered by 'es crucial que'.
3
Analyze the register of the second part of the underlined segment.
The phrase 'que tú apoyes' uses the informal second-person singular pronoun ('tú').
Argumentative essays require an objective, formal academic register, meaning direct address using informal pronouns should be avoided.
4
Identify the option that corrects both the grammatical mood and the register.
The correct phrase uses 'cambie' (subjunctive) and replaces 'tú apoyes' with a formal third-person noun phrase like 'la población apoye'.
This successfully elevates the vocabulary while fixing the grammatical structure.

Key Concept

Maintaining academic register and correct subjunctive usage in argumentative writing
Presentational Writing: Argumentative Essay Practice Questions — AP Spanish Language and Culture | Examkin