All practice questions

13931 questions

Question 10261Question

A government that lacks popular consent attempts to secure citizen compliance by relying heavily on armed forces and security apparatuses rather than constitutional mechanisms. Which of the following best describes the status of this regime's governance?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: It exercises coercive power without possessing political legitimacy.

Answer

It exercises coercive power without possessing political legitimacy.
Political legitimacy exists when citizens recognize the moral or legal right of a government to rule and voluntarily obey its laws. When a government bypasses constitutional consent and depends on state security forces to compel obedience, it relies on coercive power rather than political legitimacy or recognized authority.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Define political legitimacy
Legitimacy is the recognition and voluntary acceptance of a government's right to rule by its citizens.
Establishing the defining characteristic of legitimacy distinguishes it from brute force.
2
Analyze the scenario
The regime lacks popular consent and uses security forces to compel obedience.
Using force to compel compliance without consent signifies power (coercion) rather than legitimate authority.
3
Select the option reflecting coercion over legitimacy
The statement describing the exercise of coercive power without political legitimacy is correct.
Power is the capacity to enforce obedience, whereas authority and legitimacy require valid entitlement and citizen recognition.

Key Concept

Difference between Coercive Power and Political Legitimacy
Question 10262Question

Arrange the following key historical milestones in the evolution, institutional development, and security interventions of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in chronological order from the earliest to the latest.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence begins with the signing of the Treaty of Lagos (1975), followed by the adoption of the Free Movement Protocol (1979), the military deployment of ECOMOG to Liberia (1990), and finally the signing of the Revised ECOWAS Treaty in Cotonou (1993).
The events progress sequentially from foundational integration efforts to policy implementation, conflict resolution, and structural reform: the Treaty of Lagos founded ECOWAS in 1975; the Free Movement Protocol was adopted in 1979; ECOMOG was dispatched to Liberia in 1990; and the Revised ECOWAS Treaty was signed in 1993.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the year of ECOWAS formation.
The Treaty of Lagos was signed on May 28, 1975, establishing the community.
Formation must precede subsequent operational protocols and security interventions.
2
Identify the adoption of key economic integration protocols.
The Protocol on the Free Movement of Persons, Residence, and Establishment was enacted in May 1979.
This major policy initiative followed four years after the initial treaty.
3
Determine the date of security mechanism operationalization.
The Standing Mediation Committee established ECOMOG, which deployed troops to Liberia in August 1990.
Security challenges in the 1990s forced ECOWAS to expand beyond its original purely economic scope.
4
Identify institutional reform treaty revisions.
The Revised Treaty of ECOWAS was signed in Cotonou, Benin, in July 1993.
The 1993 treaty incorporated the security dimensions learned from ECOMOG interventions and conferred enhanced supranational powers.

Key Concept

Chronological evolution of ECOWAS legal treaties, human mobility protocols, and security interventions.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 10263Question

Which city served as the historic venue for the founding conference of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) in September 1960? Complete the statement below with the correct city.

Fill in the blanks below

The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) was formally established during an international conference held in in September 1960.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

Baghdad
OPEC was created at the Baghdad Conference held from September 10 to 14, 1960, by five founding member nations: Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the city where OPEC was founded in September 1960.
The five founding members (Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela) met in Baghdad, Iraq.
The Baghdad Conference of September 10–14, 1960, resulted in the official creation of OPEC.

Key Concept

Founding of OPEC at the Baghdad Conference (1960)
Question 10264Question

How do the organs of government exercise constitutional control over one another under the doctrine of checks and balances? Match each organ of government in Column A with its corresponding checking mechanism in Column B.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Executive Branch
Legislative Branch
Judicial Branch

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The Executive Branch checks the Legislative Branch by vetoing bills; the Legislative Branch checks the Executive Branch by withholding confirmation of appointments and controlling funds; and the Judicial Branch checks both branches by declaring unconstitutional acts null and void.
In a constitutional presidential system, each organ of government is endowed with specific constitutional tools to restrain the powers of the other organs: the executive veto checks the legislature, legislative confirmation and purse control check the executive, and judicial review checks both branches.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary constitutional checking power of the Executive Branch over the Legislature.
The Executive Branch holds the authority to veto legislation passed by the legislature.
Veto power prevents legislative overreach and allows executive review before a bill becomes law.
2
Identify the primary constitutional checking power of the Legislative Branch over the Executive.
The Legislative Branch holds the power to confirm executive appointments and approve fiscal budgets.
Legislative oversight ensures that executive appointments and public spending remain accountable to elected representatives.
3
Identify the primary constitutional checking power of the Judicial Branch over both branches.
The Judicial Branch possesses the power of judicial review.
Judicial review enables courts to declare laws passed by the legislature or orders issued by the executive null and void if they violate the constitution.

Key Concept

Constitutional Checks and Balances among Organs of Government
Question 10265Question

Despite introducing Nigerian political leaders into the central Executive Council, a primary structural defect of the Macpherson Constitution of 1951 was that these ministers were

Show answer & explanation

Answer: denied direct departmental responsibility and executive control over their portfolios.

Answer

Under the Macpherson Constitution of 1951, ministers lacked individual departmental responsibility and executive control over administrative ministries.
A major shortcoming of the 1951 Macpherson Constitution was that while it created ministerial positions for Nigerians within the Council of Ministers, it did not assign them direct executive authority or administrative control over government departments. Permanent Secretaries (British colonial officials) retained executive control, leaving ministers as collective decision-makers without individual ministerial portfolios.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the executive structure of the 1951 Macpherson Constitution.
Identified the establishment of the central Council of Ministers comprising the Governor, official members, and 12 Nigerian ministers (4 from each region).
To evaluate the specific constitutional role and powers assigned to Nigerian ministers under this constitution.
2
Examine the limitations placed on the executive roles of these ministers.
Discovered that ministers were not given full charge of government departments (ministries); civil service heads retained executive administrative powers.
This lack of portfolio control led to the classification of these positions as 'ministers without responsibility', representing a key constitutional flaw.

Key Concept

Executive defect of ministerial positions under the 1951 Macpherson Constitution
Question 10266Question

Arrange the following institutional milestones in the structural evolution of Nigerian federalism and state creation in their correct chronological sequence, from the earliest to the most recent:

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence is: (1) Submission of the Willink Commission report (1958), (2) Creation of the Mid-Western Region via referendum (1963), (3) Promulgation of Decree No. 34 / Unification Decree (1966), (4) Division of regions into twelve states under Decree No. 14 (1967), and (5) Inauguration of the Justice Ayo Irikefe Panel on state creation (1975).
The sequence follows the exact historical timeline of Nigeria's constitutional and structural governance: the 1958 Willink Commission report was followed by the creation of the Mid-Western Region in August 1963, the short-lived Unification Decree No. 34 in May 1966, the creation of 12 states via Decree No. 14 in May 1967, and the inauguration of the Irikefe Panel in August 1975.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the colonial-era milestone preceding Nigerian independence.
The Willink Commission was appointed in 1957 and submitted its report in 1958, concluding that creating new states was not necessary to protect minorities.
This represents the foundational pre-independence debate on federalism.
2
Determine the first post-independence democratic structural alteration.
The Mid-Western Region was carved out of the Western Region in August 1963, making it the only state/region created through a constitutional democratic process in Nigerian history.
This established a four-region federal framework prior to military intervention.
3
Identify the initial military attempt to alter federal structure.
Major-General Aguiyi-Ironsi issued Decree No. 34 on May 24, 1966, formally abolishing regions and unifying the civil service into a unitary structure.
This centralizing move triggered severe political opposition leading to a counter-coup.
4
Pinpoint the military response restoring and restructuring federalism.
General Yakubu Gowon issued Decree No. 14 on May 27, 1967, dividing Nigeria into twelve states to defuse regional tensions and counter Eastern secession.
This fundamentally replaced the regional structure with a multi-state federal model.
5
Locate the second major military panel on state creation.
General Murtala Muhammed inaugurated the Justice Ayo Irikefe Panel in August 1975, which subsequently led to the creation of seven additional states (making 19 states) in February 1976.
This represents the mid-1970s phase of federal state expansion.

Key Concept

Chronological evolution of state creation mechanisms and structural reforms in Nigerian federalism.
Question 10267Question

Although the Macpherson Constitution of 1951 established a Council of Ministers to increase Nigerian participation in governance, the executive authority of these newly appointed central ministers was severely constrained. Which of the following best describes the major structural limitation imposed on central ministers under this constitution?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Ministers were assigned responsibility for initiating policy discussions and speaking on departmental matters in the legislature, but lacked actual administrative direction and executive control over their respective departments.

Answer

Ministers were assigned responsibility for initiating policy discussions and speaking on departmental matters in the legislature, but lacked actual administrative direction and executive control over their respective departments.
The correct answer accurately reflects the main constitutional defect of the 1951 Macpherson Constitution's executive organ. Although twelve Nigerian ministers were appointed to the central Council of Ministers, they functioned primarily as parliamentary spokespersons for departmental business rather than executive heads with administrative direction over civil servants.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the executive framework of the 1951 Macpherson Constitution.
Identified that while the constitution created a central Council of Ministers consisting of 12 Nigerian ministers (4 from each region) and 6 official colonial members, their actual executive power was limited.
Understanding the distinction between legislative presentation and executive authority is key to evaluating colonial constitutional developments.
2
Evaluate the administrative role assigned to Nigerian ministers under the 1951 Constitution.
Found that ministers were termed 'ministers without portfolio' or spokesmen because permanent senior British civil servants retained direct control over department administration, policy implementation, and staff.
This structural flaw led to nationalist agitation for genuine ministerial responsibility, which was later granted under the 1954 Lyttelton Constitution.

Key Concept

Ministerial Roles and Executive Limitations under the Macpherson Constitution of 1951
Question 10268Question

Following widespread public criticism over a contentious trade regulation introduced by a ministry, a parliamentary oversight committee demands that the senior civil servant who drafted the technical framework appear for public cross-examination to face political query and disciplinary action. Based on the constitutional conventions governing public administration, how should the Minister handle this demand?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Decline to expose the official to legislative sanction and accept full political responsibility for the policy before parliament.

Answer

The Minister should decline to expose the official to legislative sanction and accept full political responsibility for the policy before parliament.
Under the constitutional principle of civil service anonymity paired with ministerial responsibility, career civil servants are shielded from public praise, political criticism, and direct legislative attack. They provide expert, non-partisan advice in confidence. The political head of the ministry (the Minister) takes full public and political responsibility for all policies enacted under their administration.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the core governance principle involved in the scenario
The scenario tests the application of civil service anonymity and ministerial responsibility in a parliamentary oversight context.
Civil servants draft technical policies on behalf of ministers, but political heads are public-facing.
2
Distinguish between political responsibility and administrative advice
Senior civil servants offer confidential expert advice to political executives, while political ministers take public credit or blame for implemented policies.
This convention protects non-elected career bureaucrats from partisan debate and maintains public service continuity.
3
Determine the constitutionally correct response of the Minister
The Minister must shield the civil servant from public legislative reprimand and defend the ministry's policy decisions personally.
Ministerial responsibility demands that political leaders answer to parliament for all departmental actions.

Key Concept

Civil Service Anonymity and Ministerial Responsibility
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 10269Question

During a general election, an ad-hoc electoral officer is apprehended for deliberately altering official result sheets at a collation center. Under Nigerian electoral legislation, which institution possesses the legal jurisdiction to try and penalize the offender for this electoral offence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A court of standard criminal jurisdiction

Answer

A court of standard criminal jurisdiction
Under Nigerian electoral law, acts such as result falsification, ballot snatching, and voter impersonation are categorized as criminal electoral offences. These offences are prosecuted in conventional courts of criminal jurisdiction (such as High Courts or Magistrate Courts). In contrast, Election Petition Tribunals deal exclusively with civil challenges regarding who lawfully won an election.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Distinguish between civil election petitions and criminal electoral offences.
Altering election result sheets constitutes a statutory criminal offence under the Electoral Act, rather than a civil dispute over declared election winners.
Criminal breaches carry penal sanctions (fines or imprisonment) and require prosecution in trial courts.
2
Identify the judicial body vested with jurisdiction over criminal electoral breaches.
Regular criminal courts (such as State High Courts, the Federal High Court, or Magistrate Courts depending on statutory provisions) possess jurisdiction to prosecute electoral crimes.
Election Petition Tribunals are specialized tribunals created strictly to determine whether a candidate was validly elected, not to impose criminal penalties on individual offenders.

Key Concept

Distinction Between Election Petition Tribunals and Criminal Courts in Electoral Administration
Question 10270Question

In pre-colonial Igbo governance, while executive decisions were deliberated by village assemblies and male titleholders, lineage-based women's assemblies such as the Umuada exercised vital institutional checks on political authority. Which of the following best analyzes the primary mechanism through which the Umuada enforced compliance and resolved severe intra-lineage or political deadlocks when male elders failed to act?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Mobilizing collective social sanctions, market strikes, and moral-spiritual ostracism to halt communal operations until male leaders accommodated their resolutions

Answer

The Umuada enforced compliance and resolved political deadlocks by mobilizing collective social sanctions, market strikes, and moral-spiritual ostracism to halt communal operations until male leaders accommodated their resolutions.
In pre-colonial Igbo governance, the Umuada (married daughters of a patrilineage) possessed immense moral, ritual, and judicial authority over their natal communities. Because of their unique ritual standing, their decisions in intra-lineage conflicts were binding. When male-dominated institutions such as the Ama-ala (council of elders) reached a deadlock or committed acts of injustice, the Umuada could mobilize collective sanctions, close village markets, refuse domestic duties, or perform ritual boycotts. This complete disruption of social and economic life compelled male authorities to negotiate and resolve the crisis.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the political structure of pre-colonial Igbo society.
Identified that Igbo society was segmentary (acephalous) and relied on decentralized assemblies, lineage structures, and age grades rather than centralized monarchs or standing armies.
Understanding the institutional framework prevents misattributing monarchical powers or centralized legislative bodies.
2
Examine the specific institutional power of the Umuada (daughters of the lineage).
The Umuada held sacred, high-status positions in their natal villages, acting as supreme arbitrators in lineage disputes and keepers of moral/rituals norms.
Distinguishing the source of women's authority clarifies how their political leverage operated.
3
Evaluate the methods used by women's groups to enforce checks and balances.
When male elders or village assemblies breached custom or created political deadlocks, the Umuada organized collective resistance—such as 'sitting on a man', economic market closures, and spiritual/social boycotts—which effectively paralyzed community life until justice was rendered.
This highlights the non-coercive yet highly effective social and moral enforcement mechanisms in pre-colonial Nigerian governance.

Key Concept

Political and Social Roles of Women Groups in Pre-Colonial Nigeria
Question 10271Question

Which dramatic genre incorporates somber themes and impending misfortune, yet integrates comic relief and ultimately resolves in a peaceful or happy outcome for the main characters?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Tragicomedy

Answer

Tragicomedy
Tragicomedy is defined by its blending of tragic themes and serious conflict with comedic moments, concluding with a harmonious or joyful resolution rather than the catastrophic ending characteristic of pure tragedy.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary tonal elements and plot structure described in the stem.
The narrative contains serious or potentially tragic conflicts alongside humorous moments.
Dramatic genres are classified by their prevailing mood, stylistic devices, and plot trajectory.
2
Evaluate the nature of the resolution.
The play avoids a tragic catastrophe and finishes with a harmonious or positive resolution.
A play that synthesizes tragic tension with comic elements and avoids fatal ruin is defined as a tragicomedy.

Key Concept

Defining features and plot resolution of Tragicomedy
Question 10272Question

Under a socialist political economy, state institutions centrally determine production targets, commodity pricing, and resource distribution to serve collective societal welfare. Which fundamental mechanism of free-market capitalism does this central planning directly replace?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The price mechanism driven by market forces of supply and demand

Answer

The price mechanism driven by market forces of supply and demand
Under socialist political economy, central planning replaces the market-driven price mechanism. In capitalism, prices and production quantities are determined by the forces of supply and demand, whereas socialism relies on state planning bodies to allocate resources based on social need rather than market profitability.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze how resources and goods are allocated in capitalist versus socialist economies.
Capitalism relies on private initiative and the free-market price mechanism (supply and demand), whereas socialism relies on public ownership and central state planning.
Identifying the primary coordinator of economic activity distinguishes capitalist market systems from socialist planned systems.
2
Determine which specific capitalist operational feature is eliminated when the state assumes central planning authority.
Central planning replaces the unhindered price mechanism with administrative directives and price controls.
Instead of allowing prices to fluctuate according to supply and demand, a socialist government sets prices and production quotas centrally.

Key Concept

Central Planning vs. Price Mechanism
Question 10273Question

Match each organ or body of the Commonwealth of Nations in List I with its primary institutional function or mandate in List II.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM)
Commonwealth Secretariat
Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group (CMAG)
Commonwealth Foundation

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) matches with the supreme policy-making assembly; Commonwealth Secretariat matches with the central executive agency for administrative operations; Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group (CMAG) matches with the body monitoring political principles and democracy violations; Commonwealth Foundation matches with promoting civil society and non-governmental participation.
Each body of the Commonwealth fulfills a distinct institutional role: CHOGM serves as the supreme biennial assembly, the Secretariat handles administrative coordination, CMAG assesses democratic violations, and the Commonwealth Foundation supports civil society organizations.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary role of CHOGM
CHOGM brings together Heads of Government every two years to make top-level policy decisions.
CHOGM is the ultimate policy-making organ in the Commonwealth structure.
2
Identify the administrative organ
The Commonwealth Secretariat manages daily administrative tasks and implements multilateral programs.
The Secretariat serves as the executive administrative body created in 1965.
3
Identify the democracy and political principles enforcement mechanism
CMAG investigates serious violations of democratic values.
CMAG was constituted following the Millbrook Commonwealth Action Programme in 1995 specifically to enforce political values.
4
Identify the civil society organ
The Commonwealth Foundation fosters non-governmental and civil society engagement.
The Foundation specifically addresses non-state actor participation and inter-civil-society relations.

Key Concept

Structure and Functions of Commonwealth Organs
Question 10274Question

Which principle best describes how political authority and legislative sovereignty were structured within the pre-colonial Igbo village assembly system?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Sovereign power resided collectively in the community through direct open deliberation and consensus, reflecting a decentralized republican governance.

Answer

Sovereign power resided collectively in the community through direct open deliberation and consensus, reflecting a decentralized republican governance.
Pre-colonial Igbo society practiced an acephalous (stateless) and segmentary model of governance. Political power was not concentrated in a single monarch; instead, legislative authority belonged to the community as a whole through the village assembly (Oha-na-eze), operating on direct democracy and consensus.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the structural nature of pre-colonial Igbo political organization.
The traditional Igbo political system was acephalous (non-centralized/stateless) and highly egalitarian.
Unlike centralized kingdom systems with paramount rulers, authority in Igbo society was diffused among segmentary institutions.
2
Examine how legislative and political decisions were formulated.
Decisions were made collectively in the village assembly (Oha-na-eze) through open discussions and unanimous consensus among lineage heads and adult males.
Direct democratic consensus was the primary mechanism of governance, embodying the concept of republicanism.

Key Concept

Igbo Acephalous Structure and Direct Village Assembly Democracy
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 10275Question

In pre-colonial Igbo political administration, routine public works such as clearing village paths, maintaining market places, and executing the decisions of the elders were primarily performed by which institution?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Age grades

Answer

In pre-colonial Igbo governance, the age grades served as the executive body responsible for physical law enforcement, public infrastructure maintenance, and community defense.
In pre-colonial Igbo political administration, age grades (groups of peers born within a specific timeframe) served as the primary executive organ of the community. They were charged with maintaining public infrastructure, performing communal labor, guarding the settlement, and enforcing compliance with decisions established by elders and village assemblies.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the functional division of political roles in pre-colonial Igbo decentralized society.
The village assembly and council of elders made legislative decisions, while specialized socio-political groups carried out distinct executive and judicial functions.
Igbo governance was segmentary and relied on task distribution without a centralized monarch.
2
Identify which institutional organ performed physical civic maintenance and law enforcement.
Age grades (youth cohorts organized by peer age groups) executed physical labor, guarded the village, and enforced assembly rulings.
Physical energy, structured organization, and peer accountability made age grades suitable for executive enforcement.

Key Concept

Executive Role of Age Grades in Pre-Colonial Igbo Society
Estimated Time:45s
Question 10276Question

Complete the statement below regarding theatrical techniques and character functions by filling in the correct literary terms for each blank.

Fill in the blanks below

In dramatic performance, a dialogue structure featuring rapid, alternating single lines spoken between two characters to escalate verbal conflict is known as . Meanwhile, a character whose personal attributes directly contrast with those of another character to highlight specific personality traits is termed a dramatic .
Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct literary term for the first blank is 'stichomythia' and for the second blank is 'foil'.
The literary term 'stichomythia' refers to rapid-fire, single-line alternating dialogue used in drama to create urgency or tension. The literary term 'foil' refers to a character created to highlight the traits of another character through direct contrast.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the theatrical device defined by quick, alternating single-line dialogue between two speakers.
Recognize that this rhythmic exchange pattern is stichomythia.
Stichomythia is a specialized dramatic convention used to intensify emotional confrontation or intellectual debate.
2
Identify the character function defined by contrasting traits that emphasize another character's qualities.
Recognize that this structural role is a dramatic foil.
A foil highlights specific strengths, weaknesses, or moral qualities of another character through sharp juxtaposition.

Key Concept

Dramatic Devices and Conventions
Question 10277Question

Arrange the following key democratic governance milestones of Nigeria's Fourth Republic in chronological order, from the earliest event to the most recent. What is the correct chronological sequence?

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence begins with the restoration of civilian rule in May 1999, followed by the statutory establishment of the EFCC in 2003, the first civilian-to-civilian presidential transition in May 2007, and culminates with the nationwide deployment of BVAS in the February 2023 presidential election.
The events progress logically and chronologically across Nigeria's Fourth Republic governance timeline: 1999 (return to civilian democracy) → 2003 (establishment of the EFCC) → 2007 (first civilian-to-civilian presidential handover) → 2023 (nationwide deployment of BVAS technology in general elections).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the year of the inauguration of the Fourth Republic.
The Fourth Republic was officially inaugurated on May 29, 1999.
This is the foundational political event restoring democratic governance.
2
Identify the creation date of the EFCC.
The EFCC Act was enacted in 2003 under President Obasanjo.
It represents an early institutional anti-corruption reform in the Fourth Republic.
3
Determine the date of the first civilian-to-civilian presidential handover.
President Obasanjo handed over executive power to President Yar'Adua on May 29, 2007.
This was the first time in Nigeria's history that an elected civilian president successfully handed over power to another elected civilian.
4
Identify the first nationwide general election deployment of BVAS by INEC.
BVAS was deployed nationwide for the February 2023 general elections.
This represents a modern technological milestone in electoral management under the Fourth Republic.

Key Concept

Chronological evolution of democratic institutions, political transitions, and electoral technology in Nigeria's Fourth Republic.
Question 10278Question

Match each electoral franchise term on the left with its correct legal or political description on the right.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Universal Adult Suffrage
Restricted Franchise
Disenfranchisement
Enfranchisement

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Universal Adult Suffrage pairs with the constitutional provision granting voting rights to all adult citizens without property, gender, or tax qualifications. Restricted Franchise pairs with the limitation of voting rights based on property, income, tax, or educational criteria. Disenfranchisement pairs with the statutory revocation or denial of the right to vote. Enfranchisement pairs with the legal process of conferring voting rights upon previously excluded groups.
Universal Adult Suffrage corresponds to universal voting access for adults without property or tax barriers. Restricted Franchise corresponds to imposing legal conditions like tax payment or wealth on voter eligibility. Disenfranchisement represents the legal deprivation of voting rights. Enfranchisement represents the legal granting or expansion of voting rights to excluded citizens.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Universal Adult Suffrage
Identified as the principle of universal voting equality based solely on reaching the legal age of majority.
Democratic systems use universal suffrage to ensure political equality across all social strata.
2
Analyze Restricted Franchise
Identified as a system where voting privileges depend on selective qualifications like income, property, or tax payments.
Historical constitutions, such as the 1922 Clifford Constitution in Nigeria, restricted franchise based on gross annual income.
3
Analyze Disenfranchisement
Identified as the act of legally stripping or denying an individual's right to vote.
Statutory disqualifications often include imprisonment for felony offenses or mental incompetence.
4
Analyze Enfranchisement
Identified as the act of expanding electoral rights to include previously disenfranchised citizens.
Constitutional amendments historically extended suffrage to groups like women and non-property owners.

Key Concept

Franchise and Suffrage Terminology
Question 10279Question

Arrange the following key legal and institutional landmarks in the evolution of African continental integration under the OAU and AU in correct chronological order, from earliest to latest.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence from earliest to latest is: Signing of the OAU Charter (1963), Adoption of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (1981), Signing of the Abuja Treaty establishing the African Economic Community (1991), and Inauguration of the Peace and Security Council of the African Union (2004).
The correct chronological arrangement follows the historical development of African diplomacy: the OAU Charter established the baseline continental organisation in 1963; the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights introduced human rights governance in 1981; the Abuja Treaty formulated the continental economic framework in 1991; and the Peace and Security Council was operationalized under the African Union structure in 2004.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the year of establishment for the foundational Organisation of African Unity.
The OAU Charter was signed in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, on May 25, 1963.
This marks the start of formal continental multilateral cooperation post-independence.
2
Determine the date of adoption for the continental human rights framework.
The African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights was adopted in Nairobi/Banjul in June 1981.
The OAU expanded its mandate to institutionalize human rights protections across member states.
3
Identify the date of the economic integration roadmap treaty.
The Abuja Treaty establishing the African Economic Community (AEC) was signed on June 3, 1991.
This treaty established a six-stage plan over 34 years to achieve full African economic integration.
4
Locate the inauguration date of the AU's central security architecture organ.
The Peace and Security Council (PSC) of the African Union was officially launched in May 2004.
The PSC replaced the old OAU Mechanism for Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution as a key operational organ of the newly established African Union.

Key Concept

Chronological institutional evolution from the Organisation of African Unity (OAU) to the African Union (AU)
Question 10280Question

Under a presidential system of government, which organ of government exercises a constitutional check on executive power by screening and confirming ministerial appointments?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Legislature

Answer

The Legislature
In a presidential democracy, legislative confirmation of political nominees serves as a vital check and balance against executive overreach, ensuring executive officers meet public approval standards.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the government organ responsible for approving executive political nominations.
The legislative organ (parliament or congress) conducts screening and confirmation hearings.
This prevents the president or executive branch from unilaterally appointing key public officers without legislative oversight.

Key Concept

Legislative Oversight and Checks on Executive Power
PreviousPage 514 / 697Next
All practice questions — JAMB UTME | Examkin