All practice questions

13931 questions

Question 10321Question

In a federal system of government, the central legislature possesses the supreme constitutional authority to unilaterally alter the legislative distribution of powers without requiring the consent or constitutional ratification of the federating component units.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: False

Answer

False
In a true federal system, component states and the central government share coordinate authority derived from a supreme, rigid constitution. Consequently, the central legislature cannot unilaterally amend the constitutional allocation of powers without formal ratification by the federating units.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core assertion regarding constitutional amendment power in a federal system.
The statement asserts that the central legislature can unilaterally modify the division of legislative powers.
Examining amendment authority is essential for identifying whether sovereignty is shared or centralized.
2
Evaluate the constitutional relationship between the central government and federating units in a federal system.
Both levels of government derive their power directly from a supreme, rigid constitution and act as coordinate authorities rather than subordinate bodies.
Coordinate autonomy prevents either level from altering the constitutional contract independently.
3
Determine the true/false value based on federal principles.
The assertion describes unitary legislative supremacy rather than federal constitutional rigidity, making the statement false.
Federal constitutions mandate dual-level ratification mechanisms involving component units for structural constitutional amendments.

Key Concept

Constitutional Rigidity and Amendment Procedure in Federalism
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 10322Question

Arrange the following administrative and operational stages in the conduct of a general election by Nigeria's Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in their correct chronological sequence, from first to last.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence of electoral administration stages is: Delimitation of electoral constituencies and compilation of the comprehensive voter register → Publication of the statutory notice of election and the final list of nominated candidates → Accreditation of registered voters, casting of ballots, and sorting of votes at individual polling units → Sequential collation of results across designated administrative centers and official return declaration.
The conduct of elections by an Electoral Management Body (EMB) follows a legal and operational timeline. It begins with establishing constituency boundaries and updating the voter register, proceeds to publishing official election notices and nominated candidates, moves to polling unit voting operations, and concludes with result collation and final declaration.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the foundational pre-election legal and structural preparation phase
Delimitation of constituency boundaries and continuous voter registration (item_3) must precede any election cycle.
An electoral management body cannot publish candidate lists or register voters without established constituency boundaries and an updated voter register.
2
Identify the official notification and candidacy validation phase
Publication of the statutory notice of election and certified candidate lists (item_1) follows voter registration.
Statutory notice informs political parties and the public of election dates and qualified candidates prior to campaign deadlines.
3
Identify the election day voting procedures
Accreditation, secret voting, counting, and recording of results at polling units (item_2) occur on election day.
Field operations and primary vote recording are executed directly at polling units on the specified election date.
4
Identify the post-polling aggregation and announcement phase
Collation of results through ward, local government, state, and national centers leading to final declaration (item_4) comes last.
Collation aggregates verified polling unit results to determine the overall outcome and issue certificates of return.

Key Concept

Chronological Stages in Electoral Conduct and Management
Question 10323Question

Match each structural innovation introduced under the 1954 Lyttelton Constitution on the left with its corresponding constitutional provision or administrative role on the right.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Office of the Regional Premier
Federal Territory of Lagos
Quasi-Federal Status of Southern Cameroons
Regional Public Service Commissions

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct pairings are: Office of the Regional Premier matches with the provision creating executive leadership for majority party leaders in Regional Assemblies; Federal Territory of Lagos matches with being excised from the Western Region to serve as an independent federal seat; Quasi-Federal Status of Southern Cameroons matches with separation from the Eastern Region into a distinct territorial administration with its own legislature; and Regional Public Service Commissions matches with independent authority over recruitment, promotion, and discipline of regional civil servants.
The 1954 Lyttelton Constitution established true federalism in Nigeria. It introduced the office of Premier for majority party leaders in regional legislatures, designated Lagos as a federal capital territory separate from the West, granted Southern Cameroons quasi-regional status with its own assembly separate from the East, and established autonomous Regional Public Service Commissions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the regional executive provisions of the 1954 Lyttelton Constitution
Identify that the position of Premier was formally established in 1954 for the leaders of majority parties in each region.
Prior to 1954 under Macpherson's 1951 Constitution, regional leaders did not hold the formal executive title of Premier.
2
Evaluate territorial adjustments regarding Lagos and Southern Cameroons
Confirm Lagos was detached from the Western Region to become a federal territory, while Southern Cameroons was separated from the Eastern Region as a quasi-region.
These territorial reorganizations were crucial structural decisions made during the 1953/1954 constitutional conferences to balance federalism.
3
Examine the civil service regionalization reforms
Connect Regional Public Service Commissions to the decentralization of bureaucratic recruitment and discipline.
True federalism under Lyttelton required autonomous regional civil services separate from central control.

Key Concept

Constitutional provisions and structural features of the 1954 Lyttelton Constitution establishing Nigerian federalism
Question 10324Question

In Nigeria's Fourth Republic, the Supreme Court has played a pivotal role in enforcing constitutionalism and resolving major disputes across executive powers, state governance, and electoral administration. How should the following landmark Supreme Court judgments be arranged in chronological order, from the earliest decision to the most recent?

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence from earliest to most recent is: 1) Upholding federal anti-corruption power under the ICPC Act (June 2002); 2) Nullifying gubernatorial impeachment due to Section 188 violations (January 2007); 3) Ruling that electoral votes belong to political parties in candidate substitution disputes (October 2007); 4) Resolving candidate substitution following a lead candidate's death mid-election (September 2016).
The correct chronological arrangement begins with the June 2002 AG Ondo State v. AG Federation ruling that established federal legislative jurisdiction over nationwide anti-corruption enforcement. This is followed by the January 2007 Inakoju v. Adeleke decision enforcing strict constitutional procedure for gubernatorial impeachment. Next is the October 2007 Amaechi v. INEC judgment establishing that electoral votes belong to political parties. The sequence concludes with the September 2016 Faleke v. INEC judgment resolving the constitutional dilemma of candidate substitution upon a lead candidate's death.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the year of the federal anti-corruption jurisdiction ruling (AG Ondo v. AG Federation).
The Supreme Court delivered this landmark judgment in June 2002 during the first administration of the Fourth Republic.
Ondo State challenged the federal anti-corruption framework, leading to early constitutional interpretation of Item 60(a).
2
Determine the date of the Oyo State gubernatorial impeachment procedural ruling (Inakoju v. Adeleke).
The Supreme Court voided Governor Rashidi Ladoja's impeachment in January 2007.
This judgment established that legislative impeachment must strictly comply with Section 188 of the 1999 Constitution.
3
Identify the date of the Rivers State candidacy and party vote ownership ruling (Amaechi v. INEC).
The Supreme Court delivered its final verdict in October 2007.
The court held that votes in Nigerian elections belong to the political party that sponsored the candidate.
4
Determine the date of the Kogi State candidate death substitution case (Faleke v. INEC).
The Supreme Court resolved this unprecedented legal dispute in September 2016.
The case arose following the death of Prince Abubakar Audu during the November 2015 Kogi gubernatorial election.

Key Concept

Fourth Republic constitutional jurisprudence and judicial adjudication
Question 10325Question

Which of the following fundamental features strictly distinguishes a state from a nation?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Possession of sovereign legal authority over a defined territory and population

Answer

Possession of sovereign legal authority over a defined territory and population
The correct option highlights sovereignty and territorial jurisdiction, which are the defining legal characteristics of a state. While a nation is bound by cultural and psychological ties, a state must possess supreme political authority over a specified geographic region.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the essential political elements of a state.
A state requires four concrete elements: a defined territory, a permanent population, a government, and sovereignty (supreme legal authority).
Sovereignty and political jurisdiction legally define statehood.
2
Compare state features with nation features.
A nation is formed by a group of people united by common language, ethnicity, culture, or historical consciousness, which may exist without a sovereign state.
Distinguishing between legal political authority (state) and psychological/cultural identity (nation) clarifies the correct distinction.

Key Concept

Distinction between State and Nation
Question 10326Question

In pre-colonial Igbo political governance, dispute resolution and administrative authority followed a recognized escalation hierarchy. Arrange the following traditional figures and institutions in order from the basic lineage level up to the supreme coercive enforcement body.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct order from the basic lineage level to the supreme enforcement body is: 1. Okpara (lineage head), 2. Ama-ala (council of elders), 3. Ozo title holders, 4. Mmanwu secret society.
Authority in decentralized Igbo political systems ascends progressively from the patrilineal family head (Okpara), to the village council of elders (Ama-ala), then to honored moral arbiters (Ozo title holders), culminating in supernatural executive enforcement by secret cults (Mmanwu).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary localized unit of authority in pre-colonial Igbo political administration.
The Okpara (head of the Umunna) handles initial conflict resolution within the immediate extended family.
In segmentary Igbo society, political and ritual authority begins at the patrilineal lineage level.
2
Determine the next broad legislative and judicial body at the village level.
Unresolved conflicts or village-wide matters move upward to the Ama-ala (council of elders).
The council of elders represents general democratic consensus across all lineage heads in the village.
3
Identify the elevated moral arbitration body for deadlocked disputes.
Ozo title holders mediate difficult inter-lineage or high-stakes community disputes.
Title holders command high social prestige, moral integrity, and political influence as elite advisors.
4
Identify the ultimate coercive enforcement institution in the governance structure.
The Mmanwu secret society acts as the final judicial enforcer to compel obedience.
Secret societies mask their human identity to represent ancestral spirits, giving them absolute immunity and coercive power to execute sanctions.

Key Concept

Hierarchy of political authority and dispute escalation in pre-colonial Igbo society
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 10327Question

Which of the following serves as an essential prerequisite for ensuring that public opinion continuously holds governing authorities accountable between election cycles?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: An active civil society alongside a free and independent press

Answer

An active civil society alongside a free and independent press
In representative democracy, elections provide periodic accountability, but an active civil society and a free press act as continuous safeguards. They inform citizens, investigate state actions, and aggregate public opinion to keep the government responsive between elections.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core requirement of the question stem
Identified that the question focuses on continuous public accountability between periodic elections.
Elections occur periodically, so democratic governance requires ongoing institutional mechanisms to convey public opinion and check power in the interim.
2
Evaluate the democratic prerequisites in the options
Determined that civil society organizations and mass media act as the primary conduits for public opinion, civic engagement, and investigative oversight.
Without independent media and civic associations, public opinion cannot be effectively voiced or organized to influence government policy.

Key Concept

Prerequisites for Successful Democracy
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 10328Question

Match each structural mechanism or constitutional feature of a unitary political system in Column A with its precise legal characteristic or governance implication in Column B.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Statutory Devolution
Parliamentary Supremacy
Administrative Deconcentration
Constitutional Unitarism

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Statutory Devolution matches with transferring political powers to sub-national assemblies via revocable central legislation; Parliamentary Supremacy matches with concentrating supreme legal sovereignty in the national legislature; Administrative Deconcentration matches with delegating policy implementation to regional field officers while policy formulation stays central; Constitutional Unitarism matches with allowing central authorities to unilaterally reorganize sub-national boundaries without local consent.
The correct pairings accurately define the constitutional operation of a unitary government: Statutory Devolution represents revocable legislative delegation; Parliamentary Supremacy anchors absolute central legal authority; Administrative Deconcentration represents localized executive workload distribution; and Constitutional Unitarism permits central modification of territorial structures.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the constitutional basis of Statutory Devolution in unitary governance.
Devolution in a unitary state originates from ordinary statutory law passed by the national legislature, meaning regional authority is delegated rather than constitutionally entrenched.
This distinguishes unitary devolution from federal division of power, as the central government can modify or repeal the delegating act.
2
Examine the doctrine of Parliamentary Supremacy in relation to sovereign authority.
Parliamentary supremacy ensures that no subordinate authority can invalidate central legislative enactments or claim inherent sovereign rights.
Ultimate constitutional power resides strictly in the central legislative body.
3
Differentiate Administrative Deconcentration from political devolution.
Deconcentration shifts administrative workload to regional bureau offices without granting political or legislative autonomy.
It is an administrative convenience for executive execution rather than a transfer of policy-making sovereignty.
4
Evaluate the territorial impact of Constitutional Unitarism.
Because sub-national units do not possess independent constitutional status, the central state can modify regional boundaries and jurisdictions by simple parliamentary action.
Unitary frameworks operate under a single, indivisible sovereign constitutional order.

Key Concept

Legal mechanics and structural decentralization methods in a Unitary System of Government
Estimated Time:2m 30s
Question 10329Question

Under the 1951 Macpherson Constitution, Nigeria operated under a quasi-federal arrangement where regional legislation remained subject to central parliamentary approval and potential override. Which structural provision was enacted in the 1954 Lyttelton Constitution to establish true regional legislative autonomy within the federal system?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The allocation of residual legislative powers exclusively to regional houses of assembly without central veto power

Answer

The allocation of residual legislative powers exclusively to regional houses of assembly without central veto power established genuine federal legislative autonomy under the 1954 Lyttelton Constitution.
The 1954 Lyttelton Constitution formally introduced true federalism in Nigeria. It established three legislative lists: Exclusive, Concurrent, and Residual. By assigning residual powers exclusively to the regional assemblies and stripping the central government of its former power to veto regional legislation, the constitution guaranteed true regional legislative independence.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the constitutional transition from the 1951 Macpherson Constitution to the 1954 Lyttelton Constitution.
Identified that the 1951 arrangement was quasi-federal because the Central House of Representatives held overriding powers over regional legislation.
Understanding the deficit of the 1951 constitution highlights why the 1954 constitution was introduced.
2
Examine the division of legislative powers introduced in the 1954 Lyttelton Constitution.
Powers were divided into Exclusive (Federal only), Concurrent (Federal and Regional), and Residual (Regional only).
Division of legislative list is the defining institutional feature of formal federalism.
3
Determine how regional autonomy was constitutionally safeguarded against central encroachment.
By granting residual powers strictly to the regions and removing the central government's power to review or veto regional laws, the regions became autonomous tier units.
Vesting residual powers in component units without central veto power transforms a quasi-federation into a formal federation.

Key Concept

The Lyttelton Constitution of 1954 established formal federalism in Nigeria by dividing legislative powers into Exclusive, Concurrent, and Residual lists, securing regional legislative autonomy.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 10330Question

Following the disputed December 1964 federal elections in Nigeria's First Republic, a constitutional deadlock arose when President Nnamdi Azikiwe initially hesitated to invite Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa to form a new government. Which core feature of the 1963 Republican Constitution governed the constitutional relationship between the President and the Prime Minister during this crisis?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The President was a ceremonial Head of State, while executive power was exercised by the Prime Minister who commanded a parliamentary majority.

Answer

The President was a ceremonial Head of State, while executive power was exercised by the Prime Minister who commanded a parliamentary majority.
In the 1963 Republican Constitution of Nigeria's First Republic, executive power was organized around a parliamentary structure. The President functioned as a ceremonial Head of State, whereas the Prime Minister served as the executive Head of Government. Even though President Azikiwe expressed strong reservations over the conduct of the 1964 elections, constitutional convention dictated that he had to invite Abubakar Tafawa Balewa—whose coalition (NNA) commanded a parliamentary majority—to form the government, leading to the eventual compromise settlement.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the constitutional framework operating in Nigeria during the 1964 election crisis.
Nigeria operated under the 1963 Republican Constitution, which retained a Westminster-style parliamentary system.
The 1963 Constitution replaced the British monarch with a Nigerian President, but maintained the parliamentary distinction between Head of State and Head of Government.
2
Analyze the division of executive powers between the President and the Prime Minister.
The Prime Minister held effective executive power as Head of Government, while the President served as ceremonial Head of State.
By constitutional convention, the President was required to appoint as Prime Minister the leader who could command a majority in the House of Representatives.

Key Concept

Parliamentary Executive Division in Nigeria's First Republic
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 10331Question

In political science, democratic governance relies on specific operational pillars that safeguard liberty, citizen participation, and constitutional order. Match each democratic core principle on the left with its corresponding defining feature on the right.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Popular Sovereignty
Political Pluralism
Democratic Accountability
Constitutional Supremacy

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Popular Sovereignty pairs with the foundational principle that legitimate political authority derives from the consent of the people; Political Pluralism pairs with the existence and freedom of multiple political parties and interest groups to compete; Democratic Accountability pairs with the obligation of elected officials to justify policies to citizens; Constitutional Supremacy pairs with government authority being limited and governed by a supreme legal document.
Each democratic core principle is matched directly to its precise theoretical definition: Popular Sovereignty establishes that political authority stems from the electorate; Political Pluralism fosters multi-party competition and diverse group representation; Democratic Accountability mandates that elected representatives remain answerable to the electorate; and Constitutional Supremacy imposes legal boundaries on state power.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Popular Sovereignty
Identify that sovereignty resides in the electorate.
Popular sovereignty holds that the ultimate source of state legitimacy is the will of the people.
2
Analyze Political Pluralism
Match with multi-party diversity and freedom of interest groups.
Pluralism prevents single-party dominance by enabling competitive political options.
3
Analyze Democratic Accountability
Match with answerability of leaders to citizens.
Accountability ensures public officers remain responsible for their stewardships.
4
Analyze Constitutional Supremacy
Match with legal limits on state power.
Constitutional supremacy ensures no organ of government operates above the constitution.

Key Concept

Core Pillars and Principles of Democratic Systems
Question 10332Question

Which of the following structural features distinguishes a federal system of government from a unitary system?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Constitutional division of powers between central and regional authorities

Answer

The constitutional division of powers between central and regional authorities distinguishes a federal system from a unitary system.
A federal system is characterized by a formal constitutional division of legislative and executive powers between the central government and component states/regions, ensuring coordinate authority.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the defining constitutional characteristic of federalism.
Federal systems divide authority between a central government and component units via a supreme constitution.
Neither level of government derives its primary legislative authority from the other.
2
Compare this with unitary delegation and confederal sovereignty.
Unitary states rely on central delegation (devolution), whereas confederations preserve component sovereignty.
Constitutional division of power is unique to federal setups.

Key Concept

Constitutional Division of Powers in a Federal System
Question 10333Question

Match each pre-colonial Hausa-Fulani tax listed on the left with its corresponding administrative definition on the right.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Zakat
Jangali
Kharaj
Haraji

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Zakat matches obligatory religious tax on wealth for social welfare; Jangali matches tax on livestock; Kharaj matches tax on agricultural land usage; Haraji matches general capitation or poll tax.
In the pre-colonial Hausa-Fulani Emirate system, Zakat was a mandatory religious tax on wealth and grain intended for charity; Jangali was a specialized tax on cattle; Kharaj was paid on agricultural land usage; and Haraji was a general capitation or poll tax.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Differentiate between religious welfare levies and state revenue taxes.
Zakat is identified as the religious levy earmarked for social welfare and charity.
Under Islamic law in the emirate, Zakat was distinguished by its specific welfare function.
2
Distinguish between specialized economic levies.
Jangali applies to pastoral livestock, Kharaj applies to agricultural land/crops, and Haraji applies to individuals as a capitation tax.
Each revenue stream in the Hausa-Fulani fiscal structure targeted a distinct economic sector or demographic group.

Key Concept

Fiscal Administration in the Hausa-Fulani Emirate System
Question 10334Question

Authoritarian regimes typically permit non-political social institutions, such as religious bodies and private businesses, a degree of operational autonomy, whereas totalitarian regimes seek to absorb all social, economic, and cultural institutions into the state apparatus under an official ideology.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

True. Authoritarian regimes focus on maintaining political monopoly while allowing limited autonomy in non-political social and economic spheres, whereas totalitarian regimes systematically eliminate private autonomy and subject all institutions to an all-encompassing state ideology.
The statement correctly articulates the boundary of state power in both governance models. Authoritarian regimes maintain a monopoly on formal political power and demand passive obedience, leaving social structures like families, religious groups, and private businesses largely self-governing provided they remain non-political. Totalitarian regimes destroy this boundary between state and society, using total ideological control, mass mobilization, and surveillance to subordinate all private and public institutions to state goals.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structural feature of authoritarian regimes described in the statement.
Authoritarian systems restrict political competition and political rights, but they generally do not attempt to reshape every aspect of private, economic, or religious life as long as these domains do not challenge state authority.
Identifying the limited scope of state penetration in authoritarianism is essential for comparing political systems.
2
Analyze the structural feature of totalitarian regimes described in the statement.
Totalitarian systems rely on an all-encompassing state ideology to penetrate all public and private institutions, demanding active mobilization and ideological compliance across social, economic, and cultural spheres.
Understanding total state penetration differentiates totalitarianism from mere authoritarian control.
3
Compare the two regimes against the assertion made in the stem.
The statement accurately reflects the established distinction regarding institutional autonomy between authoritarian and totalitarian political systems.
Evaluating the comparison confirms that the statement is correct.

Key Concept

Institutional Autonomy Distinction Between Authoritarianism and Totalitarianism
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 10335Question

Which structural reform serves as the most fundamental long-term preventive measure against institutional electoral malpractices in a democratic state?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Establishing complete legal autonomy and financial independence for the electoral management body

Answer

Establishing complete legal autonomy and financial independence for the electoral management body
Establishing complete legal autonomy and financial independence ensures that the electoral management body (such as INEC) operates without political bias or executive dominance. Securing funding directly from the consolidated revenue fund prevents incumbent governments from using budget allocations as leverage to influence election outcomes.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core causes of institutional electoral malpractices.
Identify that executive interference and financial vulnerability of election umpires lead to compromised electoral integrity.
Electoral bodies that depend on the sitting government for funding and appointments are susceptible to partisan manipulation.
2
Evaluate preventive structural remedies.
Confirm that institutional autonomy, backed by independent funding from the consolidated revenue fund and constitutional protection of tenure, removes political leverage over electoral administrators.
Institutional independence ensures impartial administration of electoral laws.

Key Concept

Preventive Measures Against Electoral Malpractices
Question 10336Question

The legal power of the legislative branch to override an executive veto on a bill through a two-thirds majority vote directly demonstrates which principle of constitutional government?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Checks and balances limiting executive discretion

Answer

Checks and balances limiting executive discretion
The override of an executive veto by a two-thirds majority in the legislature is a classic check and balance mechanism. It ensures that while the executive can temporarily halt legislation, the legislative branch retains the constitutional capacity to prevent executive obstruction when broad legislative consensus exists.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the action described in the stem.
The legislature overrides an executive veto on a bill using a constitutional two-thirds majority requirement.
Identifying the specific inter-organ mechanism determines the constitutional principle at work.
2
Relate the action to constitutional principles of power distribution.
While separation of powers divides governmental functions among distinct branches, checks and balances enable each organ to restrain or control the others to prevent tyranny.
A legislative override is a direct check exercised by the legislature against executive veto power.

Key Concept

Checks and Balances
Question 10337Question

Match each executive system institutional dynamic listed under Column A with its corresponding constitutional mechanism under Column B.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Collective Cabinet Responsibility
Bifurcated Executive Headship
Separation of Powers with Fixed Tenure
Legislative Oversight through Vote of No Confidence

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Collective Cabinet Responsibility corresponds to the rule requiring ministers to publicly uphold cabinet decisions or resign. Bifurcated Executive Headship corresponds to the division between ceremonial Head of State and political Head of Government. Separation of Powers with Fixed Tenure corresponds to the presidential model where executive tenure is fixed and independent of legislative majorities. Legislative Oversight through Vote of No Confidence corresponds to the parliamentary procedure allowing parliament to shorten government tenure.
Each institutional dynamic correctly matches its institutional definition: Collective Cabinet Responsibility enforces ministerial unity in parliamentary systems; Bifurcated Executive Headship separates ceremonial duties from executive governance; Separation of Powers with Fixed Tenure guarantees executive term stability in presidential systems; and the Vote of No Confidence serves as the parliamentary mechanism for legislative termination of executive tenure.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Column A item 'Collective Cabinet Responsibility'
Identified as a core parliamentary principle binding cabinet ministers to collective accountability.
In parliamentary governance, dissent within cabinet decisions requires a minister's resignation.
2
Analyze Column A item 'Bifurcated Executive Headship'
Identified as the dual executive structure.
Parliamentary systems separate the ceremonial Head of State from the chief executive Head of Government.
3
Analyze Column A item 'Separation of Powers with Fixed Tenure'
Identified as a defining presidential feature.
Presidential systems maintain strict separation of personnel and fixed tenure for the chief executive.
4
Analyze Column A item 'Legislative Oversight through Vote of No Confidence'
Identified as a parliamentary removal procedure.
The legislature holds power to terminate executive authority via a vote of no confidence when confidence is lost.

Key Concept

Institutional mechanics distinguishing Parliamentary and Presidential Executive Systems
Question 10338Question

Match each pre-colonial Nigerian female political title or institution with its corresponding governance role and ethnic system.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Iyalode
Umuada
Magajiya

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Iyalode pairs with the Yoruba female chieftaincy position overseeing trade and state council representation; Umuada pairs with the Igbo lineage assembly of daughters exercising judicial sanctions; Magajiya pairs with the Hausa leadership title representing female interests.
Each women's title or collective group fulfilled distinct, recognized governance roles within their respective traditional political systems: the Iyalode in Yoruba state councils and markets, the Umuada in Igbo lineage dispute resolution, and the Magajiya in Hausa female administration.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the political system and institutional function of the Iyalode.
The Iyalode is a Yoruba title held by the female spokesperson on the chief's council and leader of economic affairs.
Pre-colonial Yoruba governance institutionalized female representation through the office of the Iyalode.
2
Determine the constitutional role of the Umuada in Igbo society.
The Umuada is the corporate group of native-born daughters in Igbo communities acting as judicial arbiters.
In the acephalous Igbo system, women maintained checks and balances through organized lineage groups like the Umuada.
3
Identify the title and jurisdiction of the Magajiya in Hausa political structure.
The Magajiya held executive influence over female affairs and royal matters in Hausa governance.
Pre-Islamic and early Hausa state structures recognized titled female figures such as the Magajiya.

Key Concept

Political and Social Roles of Women Groups in Pre-Colonial Nigeria
Question 10339Question

Following the recommendations of the Justice Ayo Irikefe Panel, the military administration of General Murtala Muhammed restructured Nigeria's federation in February 1976 by increasing the total number of states from twelve to how many states?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 19 states

Answer

19 states
In February 1976, General Murtala Muhammed implemented the findings of the Justice Ayo Irikefe Panel by creating seven new states, bringing the total number of states in the Nigerian federation from 12 to 19.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the historical regime and panel associated with the 1976 state creation exercise.
General Murtala Muhammed appointed the Justice Ayo Irikefe Panel in 1975 to examine demands for new states.
The panel recommended breaking up larger states to address minority concerns and bring government closer to the people.
2
Calculate the total number of states resulting from the implementation of the panel's report.
Seven new states were created out of the existing twelve, resulting in a total of 19 states on February 3, 1976.
This milestone increased the federal units from 12 to 19 states.

Key Concept

State Creation under General Murtala Muhammed (1976)
Question 10340Question

Match each historical summit or governing organ of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) and OPEC in Column A with its corresponding core function or diplomatic milestone in Column B.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Bandung Conference (1955)
Belgrade Summit (1961)
OPEC Ministerial Conference
OPEC Secretariat

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Bandung Conference (1955) matches establishing the ten principles of peaceful coexistence; Belgrade Summit (1961) matches formally launching the Non-Aligned Movement; OPEC Ministerial Conference matches serving as the supreme policy-making organ setting quotas; OPEC Secretariat matches functioning as the executive administrative body in Vienna.
Each historic milestone and institutional organ directly aligns with its specific role: Bandung established the ten principles of peaceful coexistence; Belgrade officially created NAM during the Cold War; the OPEC Ministerial Conference decides member quotas as the supreme authority; and the OPEC Secretariat handles executive administrative duties in Vienna.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the origins of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM)
Distinguish between the 1955 Bandung Conference (precursory principles) and the 1961 Belgrade Summit (formal establishment of the movement).
Bandung established the diplomatic philosophy, whereas Belgrade institutionalized the bloc.
2
Examine the organizational structure of OPEC
Identify the Ministerial Conference as the supreme legislative policy organ and the Secretariat as the permanent administrative executive organ.
Understanding institutional governance distinguishes policy decisions (quotas) from administrative support (research/operations).

Key Concept

Institutional frameworks and historical milestones of NAM and OPEC
PreviousPage 517 / 697Next
All practice questions — JAMB UTME | Examkin