All practice questions

13931 questions

Question 10301Question

During a national civic assessment in a modern state, researchers observe that citizens possess extensive factual knowledge about constitutional provisions and government ministries, yet overwhelmingly express deep feelings of alienation toward state institutions and perceive themselves as powerless to influence public policy decisions. According to Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba's structural breakdown of political culture, which combination of political orientations best describes this citizenry?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: High cognitive orientation, combined with negative affective and low evaluative orientations regarding political participation

Answer

The citizenry exhibits a high cognitive orientation alongside negative affective and low evaluative orientations regarding political participation.
According to Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba, political culture is composed of three internal orientations: cognitive (knowledge and belief about the political system), affective (feelings toward the system), and evaluative (judgments and personal efficacy regarding political roles). In the given scenario, citizens have high factual knowledge (high cognitive orientation), but feel alienated (negative affective orientation) and believe they cannot influence policy (low evaluative orientation regarding participation).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the knowledge aspect of the scenario.
Extensive factual knowledge about constitutional provisions and government ministries demonstrates a high cognitive orientation.
Cognitive orientation refers to knowledge of and belief about the political system, its roles, and its operation.
2
Analyze the emotional aspect of the scenario.
Deep feelings of alienation toward state institutions represent a negative affective orientation.
Affective orientation refers to feelings of attachment, rejection, alienation, or emotion toward political objects and authority.
3
Analyze the judgment and efficacy aspect of the scenario.
Perceiving oneself as powerless to influence decisions indicates low evaluative orientation regarding political efficacy and participation.
Evaluative orientation involves judgments and opinions about political performance and one's own role/efficacy within the system.

Key Concept

Components of Political Culture (Cognitive, Affective, and Evaluative Orientations)
Question 10302Question

Match each executive system operational mechanism listed on the left with its corresponding institutional definition or effect on the right.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Collective Responsibility
Individual Ministerial Responsibility
Strict Separation of Powers
Bifurcated Executive Structure

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Collective Responsibility matches the requirement for cabinet resignation upon losing a legislative vote of confidence; Individual Ministerial Responsibility matches personal accountability for a specific ministry; Strict Separation of Powers matches the constitutional restriction against cabinet members holding legislative seats; Bifurcated Executive Structure matches the division between ceremonial Head of State and executive Head of Government.
Each mechanism corresponds precisely to its institutional operation: Collective Responsibility obligates joint cabinet resignation following a no-confidence vote; Individual Ministerial Responsibility isolates personal portfolio accountability; Strict Separation of Powers enforces distinct personnel across government branches; and a Bifurcated Executive divides ceremonial and administrative leadership duties.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Collective Responsibility
Identified as a parliamentary convention where cabinet members act as a single unit and resign jointly upon losing legislative confidence.
Collective responsibility ensures cabinet unity and legislative accountability.
2
Analyze Individual Ministerial Responsibility
Identified as personal accountability focused on a minister's specific portfolio or administrative department.
Ministers must answer individually for departmental failures without necessarily triggering cabinet resignation.
3
Analyze Strict Separation of Powers
Identified as a presidential feature prohibiting dual membership in executive and legislative branches.
Presidential systems maintain clear institutional independence between organs of state.
4
Analyze Bifurcated Executive Structure
Identified as the parliamentary dual executive structure splitting ceremonial and executive authority.
Parliamentary systems distinguish the nominal state figurehead from the active head of government.

Key Concept

Structural and operational distinctions between parliamentary and presidential executive systems
Question 10303Question

In 1957, the British colonial administration appointed the Willink Commission to address minority anxieties regarding majority ethnic domination in Nigeria's three regions prior to independence. Which recommendation did the Commission make in its 1958 report concerning the demand for state creation?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: It advised against creating new states prior to independence, recommending instead constitutional provisions for fundamental human rights and special development authorities.

Answer

The Willink Commission advised against creating new states prior to independence, recommending instead constitutional provisions for fundamental human rights and special development authorities.
The correct answer accurately states the outcome of the 1958 Willink Commission report. Rather than creating new regions or states, which the Commission argued would unnecessarily postpone Nigerian independence, it proposed entrenching fundamental rights in the constitution and creating targeted development authorities to safeguard minority interests.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the historical mandate of the Willink Commission (1957–1958).
The Commission was set up to inquire into the fears of minorities in the Northern, Eastern, and Western regions and suggest means of allaying them.
Understanding the Commission's purpose clarifies why state creation demands were brought before it.
2
Analyze the Commission's recommendations regarding state creation.
The Commission concluded that creating new regions/states would delay national independence scheduled for 1960 and was not the most effective remedy for minority fears.
The British government and the Commission prioritized meeting the independence timeline.
3
Evaluate the constitutional safeguards proposed in place of state creation.
It recommended entrenching Fundamental Human Rights in the forthcoming Independence Constitution and establishing specialized bodies like the Niger Delta Development Board.
These measures aimed to protect minority interests within the existing three-region structure.

Key Concept

Willink Commission Recommendations on Minorities and State Creation
Question 10304Question

Arrange the primary functions of a modern constitution into their logical order of political establishment, moving from foundational state creation to individual rights protection.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct logical order begins with establishing sovereign state authority, followed by allocating power to government organs, instituting checks and balances, and finally entrenching fundamental citizen rights.
The correct logical sequence mirrors how constitutions structure a polity: first establishing the legal sovereignty of the state, second creating institutional organs and allocating power, third installing checks and balances to prevent tyranny, and fourth guaranteeing fundamental civil rights to protect citizens from state encroachment.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the foundational role of a constitution in political existence.
Establishing sovereign statehood and legitimacy is the necessary precursor to institutional setup.
Without a legally constituted state entity, public institutions cannot possess valid jurisdiction.
2
Determine the institutional framework function.
Organizing government organs and distributing powers.
Governance requires creating executive, legislative, and judicial bodies to exercise state power.
3
Identify the regulatory function of constitutionalism.
Applying checks and balances to constrain allocated powers.
Power allocated to state organs must be legally bounded to avert authoritarian overreach.
4
Determine the protective function regarding the individual.
Entrenching citizen rights and freedoms.
Shielding individual liberties against state encroachment completes the functional framework of modern constitutional governance.

Key Concept

Logical hierarchy and foundational sequence of constitutional functions
Question 10305Question

A statutory public corporation in charge of national power distribution unilaterally increases service tariffs to offset expanding debt without securing the formal consent of its supervising Minister, citing its financial self-sufficiency goals. If the supervising Minister officially revokes the tariff hike and suspends the board of directors, which form of control and legal basis is being exercised over the enterprise?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Ministerial control exercised through statutory supervisory powers and policy directives

Answer

Ministerial control exercised through statutory supervisory powers and policy directives
The correct answer highlights ministerial control, which represents executive oversight over statutory public corporations. Even when public corporations operate on a commercialized basis or possess legal personality, the supervising Minister retains statutory authority to approve major tariff adjustments, issue general policy directives, and intervene in management decisions to protect public interest.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the nature of the action and authority in the scenario
The action involves a supervising Minister voiding an unapproved tariff increase and suspending the board of a state-owned statutory enterprise.
Identifying the actor (Minister) and the mechanism of intervention isolates executive governance from judicial or parliamentary mechanisms.
2
Distinguish ministerial powers from other forms of public corporation control
Enabling acts mandate that major operational decisions (such as price hikes or structural borrowing) require ministerial approval, allowing cabinet ministers to issue policy directives and alter board leadership.
Public corporations enjoy operational autonomy, but remaining accountable to the public via the cabinet minister ensures policy alignment.

Key Concept

Ministerial Control over Public Corporations
Question 10306Question

Match each civil service control mechanism or bureaucratic pathology on the left with its defining administrative characteristic on the right:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Writ of Mandamus
Public Accounts Committee
Red Tape
Public Complaints Commission

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Writ of Mandamus matches judicial enforcement of unperformed statutory duties; Public Accounts Committee matches legislative financial oversight; Red Tape matches excessive adherence to rigid procedures causing delay; Public Complaints Commission matches independent ombudsman investigating citizen grievances.
Each control mechanism and bureaucratic issue is correctly aligned with its proper organ of government or operational definition: the judiciary uses writs like Mandamus to compel public duties; the legislature exercises financial control via the Public Accounts Committee; Red Tape represents procedural rigidity; and the Public Complaints Commission serves as the official administrative Ombudsman.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify judicial controls over the civil service
Recognize that the Writ of Mandamus is an order issued by the judiciary to compel administrative performance.
Judicial review prevents civil servants from neglecting statutory duties.
2
Identify legislative controls over departmental finances
Match the Public Accounts Committee to legislative scrutiny of government expenditures and audit queries.
Parliamentary control over the purse ensures civil servants operate within legislative appropriations.
3
Analyze bureaucratic problems
Associate Red Tape with rigid routine, official bottlenecking, and excessive formality.
Over-reliance on procedure hinders swift service delivery in public administration.
4
Analyze administrative redress mechanisms
Link the Public Complaints Commission to its Ombudsman role of handling public complaints against civil service administrative injustice.
Administrative Ombudsman bodies provide an accessible, non-judicial avenue for citizen redress.

Key Concept

Control of Civil Service and Bureaucratic Problems
Question 10307Question

In political theory, the characteristic of indivisibility implies that supreme legal sovereignty is divided and shared between central and state governments in a federal system.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: False

Answer

False. Sovereignty is conceptually indivisible; while federalism distributes governmental powers between central and regional tiers, ultimate legal sovereignty remains unified within the constitution.
The statement is false because sovereignty is inherently indivisible. Although a federal constitution divides administrative and legislative powers between central and state governments, legal sovereignty remains undivided and resides in the constitution.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Examine the defining characteristic of indivisibility in political theory.
Indivisibility specifies that supreme legal power cannot be split into multiple competing ultimate authorities within a state.
Fragmenting sovereignty destroys the supreme legal order of a state.
2
Differentiate between the division of governmental powers and the division of sovereignty in a federal system.
Federalism divides functional powers (legislative, executive) across levels of government, while ultimate legal sovereignty rests intact with the constitutional amendatory framework.
Distributing administrative and legislative competence does not divide supreme legal sovereignty.

Key Concept

Indivisibility of Sovereignty vs Constitutional Division of Powers
Question 10308Question

Place the key constitutional milestones and political events in chronological order, from earliest to latest, that marked the transition from the quasi-federal structure of the 1951 Macpherson Constitution to the formal establishment of Nigerian federalism under the 1954 Lyttelton Constitution.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence begins with Anthony Enahoro moving the self-government motion in March 1953, followed by the London Constitutional Conference in July–August 1953, then the Lagos Resumed Constitutional Conference in January–February 1954, and ends with the formal enactment of the Lyttelton Constitution in October 1954.
The historical progression to the 1954 Lyttelton Constitution began with the March 1953 self-government motion moved by Anthony Enahoro, which caused a cabinet crisis under the 1951 Macpherson Constitution. To resolve this, the London Constitutional Conference was held in July–August 1953 to draft the federal system. Detailed outstanding issues—such as the neutrality of Lagos and regional public services—were resolved at the Lagos Resumed Conference in January–February 1954. Finally, the Lyttelton Constitution was formally enacted on October 1, 1954.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the catalyst event that led to the collapse of the 1951 Macpherson Constitution.
The self-government motion moved by Anthony Enahoro in March 1953 led to central executive resignations and inter-regional conflict, proving the quasi-federal model unsustainable.
Constitutional reform required a political breakdown of the previous system to prompt renegotiation.
2
Trace the initial constitutional negotiations convened to address the political crisis.
Oliver Lyttelton convened the London Constitutional Conference in July–August 1953, establishing the mandate for a federal system with autonomous regions.
The London conference set the structural principle of federalism and divided legislative responsibilities.
3
Locate the subsequent follow-up conference that resolved key practical details of the federation.
The Lagos Resumed Constitutional Conference in January–February 1954 finalized fiscal allocation, judicial regionalization, and the federal status of Lagos.
This conference addressed complex institutional mechanics that could not be resolved during the initial London meetings.
4
Determine the date of formal enactment of the new constitutional order.
The Lyttelton Constitution was promulgated on October 1, 1954, making Nigeria a formal federation.
This final legal act instituted the regional premier system, separate public services, and federal power lists.

Key Concept

Chronological evolution of Nigerian federalism through constitutional conferences from 1953 to 1954
Question 10309Question

When an elected chief executive rejects a bill passed by the legislature and returns it with formal written objections, which specific constitutional power is being exercised?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Veto power

Answer

Veto power is exercised when an executive head refuses assent to a legislative bill and returns it to the legislature.
Refusing assent to a legislative bill and returning it with objections is the formal exercise of executive veto power, acting as a constitutional check on the legislature.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the action described in the question stem.
The chief executive actively refuses to sign a bill passed by the legislature and returns it with objections.
This action occurs during the law-making process before a bill becomes law.
2
Identify the relevant constitutional power associated with this action.
Withholding assent to a legislative bill constitutes an executive veto.
The veto serves as an essential constitutional mechanism for the executive to check legislative authority.

Key Concept

Executive Veto Power
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 10310Question

In a federal system of government, component units retain individual legal sovereignty and possess the constitutional right to unilaterally secede from the union.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: False

Answer

The statement is False. Component units in a federation do not hold individual legal sovereignty or the right to unilaterally secede; those characteristics define a confederal system.
The statement is false because federalism creates a perpetual legal union wherein ultimate international sovereignty resides with the central federation, and component units lack the constitutional authority to secede unilaterally.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the core constitutional claims in the statement
The statement asserts that federating units retain individual legal sovereignty and hold a constitutional right to unilateral secession.
Evaluating sovereignty location and legal right of withdrawal is essential to distinguishing federal systems from confederal political arrangements.
2
Compare federal constitutional principles with confederal structures
A federation establishes an indestructible union under a supreme federal constitution where sovereignty is undivided internationally. Unilateral secession and individual state sovereignty are features of confederalism.
Federal constitutions bind component states permanently under shared sovereign framework, precluding unilateral separation.

Key Concept

Sovereignty and Indivisibility in Federal Systems
Question 10311Question

Prior to the June 12, 1993 presidential election in Nigeria, which organization campaigned for the continuation of military rule and successfully obtained a late-night court injunction seeking to halt the conduct of the election?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Association for Better Nigeria

Answer

Association for Better Nigeria
The Association for Better Nigeria (ABN) was a controversial organization formed during General Ibrahim Babangida's military regime. On June 10, 1993, just two days prior to the scheduled election, the ABN secured an injunction from an Abuja High Court ordering the National Electoral Commission (NEC) to suspend the election, marking a major turning point in the Third Republic political crisis.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the historical event and timeline referenced in the stem
The event refers to the June 10, 1993 court ruling shortly before the June 12 presidential election under General Ibrahim Babangida's Third Republic transition program.
Establishing the specific timeline helps separate Third Republic political litigation from Second Republic or post-annulment coalitions.
2
Analyze the role of political groups operating during the transition period
The Association for Better Nigeria (ABN), founded by Chief Arthur Nzeribe, filed a suit at the Abuja High Court under Justice Bassey Ikpeme to restrain the National Electoral Commission (NEC) from holding the June 12, 1993 presidential election.
Distinguishing between pro-democracy organizations and military-backed anti-transition groups reveals the correct organization responsible for the injunction.

Key Concept

Role of the Association for Better Nigeria (ABN) in attempting to disrupt the June 12, 1993 Presidential Election
Question 10312Question

In traditional Igbo political administration, various social groups performed distinct functions to maintain civic harmony. What was the primary political function of Ozo title holders in pre-colonial Igbo society?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Providing prestigious leadership, legislative guidance, and settling high-level communal disputes

Answer

Providing prestigious leadership, legislative guidance, and settling high-level communal disputes
In pre-colonial Igbo political administration, Ozo title holders were elite citizens who earned political prestige through character, wealth, and community contribution. They served as key members of governance councils, providing wise policy guidance, arbitrating difficult disputes, and maintaining societal moral standards.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the political institution specified in the prompt
The target institution is the Ozo title holders in pre-colonial Igbo governance.
Pre-colonial Igbo governance allocated distinct civic responsibilities to Age Grades, Title Holders, Council of Elders, and Secret Societies.
2
Determine the functional role of Ozo title holders
Ozo title holders derived political authority from moral integrity, social honor, and economic success, making them trusted advisors, law-makers, and judges.
Their leadership was grounded in moral prestige and wisdom rather than physical enforcement or secret masking.

Key Concept

Roles of Title Holders in Pre-Colonial Igbo Governance
Question 10313Question

Match each pre-colonial political system on the left with its defining structural characteristic on the right.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Hausa-Fulani Emirate System
Igbo Segmentary System
Yoruba Oyo Kingdom System

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The Hausa-Fulani Emirate System matches with 'Highly centralized political hierarchy headed by an Emir with delegated regional administrative officers'; the Igbo Segmentary System matches with 'Acephalous, decentralized political structure relying on lineage groups, age grades, and consensus assembly'; and the Yoruba Oyo Kingdom System matches with 'Centralized constitutional monarchy with executive power held by the Oba and institutionally checked by a council of chiefs'.
Pre-colonial Nigerian political systems are broadly categorized into centralized (hierarchical political authority with centralized administrative machinery, such as the Hausa-Fulani Emirate and Oyo Kingdom) and segmentary/decentralized systems (acephalous structures without a single central ruler, such as the Igbo village system). Linking each political polity to its respective authority structure reflects the historical and constitutional realities of pre-colonial Nigerian societies.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the political structure of the Hausa-Fulani Emirate
The Hausa-Fulani Emirate is characterized by a centralized, hierarchical governance system under the leadership of an Emir.
Centralized emirates featured top-down administrative chains of command.
2
Identify the governance mechanism of pre-colonial Igbo society
The Igbo system was segmentary/decentralized without a single supreme leader, relying on village council assemblies.
Decentralized societies utilized diffused political power distributed across lineage heads, age grades, and title holders.
3
Identify the administrative framework of the Yoruba Oyo Kingdom
The Oyo system combined centralized executive monarchical authority (Alaafin) with institutional checks (Oyomesi).
Yoruba political systems relied on monarchical centralized structures coupled with strong constitutional checks and balances.

Key Concept

Structural comparison between centralized and segmentary pre-colonial Nigerian political systems
Question 10314Question

In a constitutional presidential democracy, the legislature holds the power of the purse, the executive retains veto power over bills, and the judiciary can declare acts of both branches unconstitutional. How does this systemic interaction manifest the core functional purpose of checks and balances?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: It ensures that governmental powers check each other to prevent tyranny while allowing necessary inter-organ interaction.

Answer

It ensures that governmental powers check each other to prevent tyranny while allowing necessary inter-organ interaction.
The system of checks and balances operationalizes the doctrine of separation of powers by enabling each organ of government to limit the excess power of others. This prevents autocracy while enabling functional coordination across branches.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core premise of checks and balances
Recognize that checks and balances modify pure separation of powers to allow mutual constitutional controls among governmental branches.
Pure separation of powers without checks could lead to deadlocks or unchecked abuse within isolated branches.
2
Evaluate the relationship between power division and political liberty
Identify that Montesquieu's framework uses power to restrain power ('le pouvoir arrête le pouvoir') to safeguard individual liberty and avert tyranny.
Inter-organ checks create equilibrium where no single organ usurps total power.

Key Concept

Checks and Balances in Separation of Powers
Question 10315Question

In the administrative structure of the pre-colonial Hausa-Fulani emirates, agricultural land usage and crop yields were subjected to a specific tax levied on farmers. Which of the following taxes was collected for this purpose?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Kharaj

Answer

Kharaj was the land tax paid on crop yields by farmers in the pre-colonial Hausa-Fulani emirate system.
Kharaj was the designated land tax in the Hausa-Fulani Emirate system, assessed on farmers based on land cultivation and crop production.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the tax category related to farming and land cultivation in the pre-colonial Hausa-Fulani emirate.
The tax assessed on agricultural output and land usage was Kharaj.
Pre-colonial Emirate fiscal administration categorized taxes based on wealth sources: land/crops (Kharaj), livestock (Jangali), religious alms (Zakat), and general personal income/poll tax (Haraji).

Key Concept

Fiscal Administration in the Hausa-Fulani Emirate (Pre-colonial Taxation System)
Question 10316Question

A major institutional friction under the Macpherson Constitution of 1951 was that central legislators often prioritized regional party interests over national policy. Which constitutional provision directly created this structural conflict?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The indirect election of central House of Representatives members from within the Regional Houses of Assembly

Answer

The indirect election of central House of Representatives members from within the Regional Houses of Assembly.
Under the Macpherson Constitution of 1951, members of the central House of Representatives were not directly elected by the populace. Instead, they were chosen indirectly from among the members of the Regional Houses of Assembly. Consequently, legislators owed their political survival and primary loyalty to their regional assemblies and regional party leaders, which created severe central-regional friction and undermined national unity.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structural arrangement of the central legislature under the Macpherson Constitution of 1951.
The 1951 Constitution established a House of Representatives whose members were indirectly elected from the Regional Houses of Assembly.
Understanding how central representatives were selected explains why their political accountability remained rooted in their respective regions.
2
Examine how this election mechanism affected regional and central party loyalty.
Because regional assemblies chose the central representatives, political parties operating regionally controlled who represented the regions at the center.
This created a situation where members of the central legislature owed their positions to regional party leaders rather than national constituents.
3
Identify the correct constitutional provision matching the question's premise.
The provision for indirect election of central legislators from regional houses directly generated regionalist loyalties and national political friction.
This structural flaw contributed significantly to the eventual breakdown of the constitution in 1953.

Key Concept

Indirect Election and Regional-Central Conflict under the Macpherson Constitution
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 10317Question

The legal and political progression towards Nigeria's 1960 Independence Constitution involved several pivotal conferences, commission reports, and legislative acts. Which sequence correctly arranges these historical milestones in chronological order from earliest to latest?

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence is: (1) Granting of internal self-government to the Western and Eastern Regions (1957), (2) Submission of the Willink Commission Report (1958), (3) Resolution at the Resumed Constitutional Conference fixing the independence date (1958), and (4) Passage of the Nigeria Independence Act by the British Parliament (1960).
The transition to independence followed a clear chronological order: Regional self-government was first granted to the Eastern and Western Regions in 1957. The Willink Commission subsequently submitted its report on minority concerns in 1958. Later in October 1958, the Resumed Constitutional Conference formally scheduled independence for October 1, 1960. Finally, in July 1960, the British Parliament enacted the Nigeria Independence Act to bring the 1960 Constitution into full legal effect.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine the date of regional self-government for the East and West.
The Eastern and Western Regions attained self-government in 1957 following the 1957 Constitutional Conference.
This established executive regional leadership prior to resolving minority fears.
2
Determine when the Willink Commission submitted its report.
The Willink Commission released its findings in 1958 recommending the inclusion of Fundamental Human Rights.
This report was completed before the final constitutional conference wrapped up negotiations.
3
Identify the conference where the independence date was set.
The Resumed Constitutional Conference held in late 1958 agreed on October 1, 1960, as the date for Nigerian independence.
This agreement set the firm deadline for legal drafting.
4
Identify the final statutory act by the colonial authority.
The British Imperial Parliament formally enacted the Nigeria Independence Act in July 1960.
This act created the legal framework that brought the 1960 Independence Constitution into force.

Key Concept

Chronological evolution of constitutional conferences, commission reports, and acts leading to the 1960 Independence Constitution
Question 10318Question

In traditional Yoruba constitutional governance, through which primary institutional mechanism did the Iyalode exercise an effective political check on the council of male chiefs and the paramount ruler?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Mobilizing economic sanctions through market women associations and participating directly in council deliberations

Answer

Mobilizing economic sanctions through market women associations and participating directly in council deliberations
The Iyalode in pre-colonial Yoruba governance held an official voice in royal councils and led market networks. By closing markets and suspending trade, women could disrupt the local economy, forcing the monarch and male chiefs to negotiate or reverse oppressive policies.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the constitutional role of the Iyalode in pre-colonial Yoruba political systems.
The Iyalode represented female political and economic interest groups in the paramount chief's cabinet.
Identifying official institutional titles establishes the scope of traditional authority.
2
Determine the source of executive leverage held by female leadership against male authorities.
Because women controlled trade networks, organized market strikes served as a powerful economic counterweight to ruler overreach.
Economic sanctions functioned as an institutional check and balance within pre-colonial state structures.

Key Concept

Political and Social Roles of Women Groups in Pre-Colonial Nigeria
Question 10319Question

Political theorists classify non-democratic systems of government based on the criteria used to select and legitimise the ruling group. Which feature uniquely distinguishes an aristocracy from an oligarchy?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Ruling authority is derived primarily from ancestral nobility and inherited social status.

Answer

Ruling authority is derived primarily from ancestral nobility and inherited social status.
The correct answer accurately identifies that an aristocracy is distinguished by governance by a noble elite whose political authority and right to rule are inherited through birthright and family lineage.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Examine the classical definition of Aristocracy
Aristocracy literally translates to 'rule by the best', where power is held by a minority whose status is inherited through noble birth and lineage.
Establishing the core criterion of membership in an aristocracy is essential for comparison.
2
Compare Aristocracy with Oligarchy
While oligarchy denotes rule by a small group based on wealth, military might, or political faction, aristocracy specifically restricts entry to individuals of noble lineage.
Differentiating hereditary nobility from broader minority wealth or force distinguishes aristocracy from oligarchy.

Key Concept

Basis of political authority in Aristocracy versus Oligarchy
Question 10320Question

In constitutional governance, executive power can be organized under either a parliamentary or a presidential system. Which of the following constitutional arrangements is a direct operational feature of a presidential executive system?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The president holds a fixed tenure of office and cannot be removed by a legislative vote of no confidence.

Answer

The correct option is the statement that the president holds a fixed tenure of office and cannot be removed by a legislative vote of no confidence.
In a presidential executive system, separation of powers ensures that the president is elected independently of the legislature and serves a fixed constitutional term. The president cannot be forced to resign simply by losing a legislative vote of confidence.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core structural features of a presidential executive system.
Under a presidential system, strict separation of powers exists between the executive and legislative branches.
The president is directly or indirectly elected by the electorate independently of the legislature.
2
Evaluate executive tenure and removal mechanisms.
The president enjoys fixed tenure and can only be removed through impeachment for gross misconduct, not through a vote of no confidence.
A vote of no confidence is an executive removal tool exclusive to parliamentary systems.

Key Concept

Fixed tenure and executive independence in a presidential system
PreviousPage 516 / 697Next
All practice questions — JAMB UTME | Examkin