Examkin

Indian Polity and Governance

316 questions

All types316Multiple choice161Multiple select68Matching74Ordering13
Question 181Question →

Under normal circumstances, what is the maximum time limit mandated by Section 7(1) of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, for a Public Information Officer (PIO) to provide requested information to an applicant?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 30 days

Answer

The statutory time limit for providing requested information under normal circumstances is 30 days.
Under Section 7(1) of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, the Public Information Officer is required to either provide the requested information or reject the application with reasons within 30 days of receiving the request.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the statutory provision defining response timelines for Public Information Officers under the RTI Act, 2005.
Section 7(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 governs the timeline for disposing of information requests.
Clear timeframes ensure administrative responsiveness and public accountability.
2
Determine the exact duration prescribed by Section 7(1) for standard requests.
The statute specifies that information must be provided or the request rejected within 30 days of receipt of the application.
30 days is the standard legal window for ordinary information requests.

Key Concept

Statutory response timelines under the Right to Information Act, 2005
Question 182Question →

Which of the following statements regarding the constitutional position, immunities, and structural limits of the Union Executive in India are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No criminal proceedings whatsoever can be instituted or continued against the President of India in any court during the term of office.; Unlike the British system, there is no constitutional provision in India establishing the legal responsibility of a Minister for an official act of the President.

Answer

The statements establishing that no criminal proceedings can be instituted against the President during office and that Indian ministers carry no legal responsibility for official presidential acts are correct.
The Constitution of India provides full criminal immunity to the President while in office under Article 361(2). Additionally, India follows executive responsibility to Parliament politically rather than legally; presidential acts do not require ministerial countersignature, meaning ministers cannot be sued in court for official executive acts.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Constitutional immunities of the President under Article 361.
Article 361(2) provides absolute immunity from criminal proceedings during the President's term. However, Article 361(4) requires a two-month advance written notice before initiating civil proceedings for personal acts.
To verify the rules governing criminal and civil immunity for the Head of State.
2
Examine the doctrine of legal responsibility of Ministers under Indian parliamentary democracy.
Unlike the United Kingdom, where executive orders require ministerial countersignature making ministers legally answerable in courts ('the King can do no wrong'), the Indian Constitution does not require ministerial countersignature, leaving no system of legal responsibility of ministers for presidential acts.
To contrast British cabinet conventions with Indian constitutional provisions.
3
Evaluate the statutory ceiling on the size of the Union Council of Ministers under Article 75(1A).
The 91st Constitutional Amendment Act (2003) added Article 75(1A), stipulating that the total number of ministers, including the Prime Minister, shall not exceed 15% of the total number of members of the House of the People (Lok Sabha), not both Houses of Parliament.
To verify the specific parliamentary house used for computing the maximum size of the council.

Key Concept

Constitutional Immunities of the President, System of Ministerial Responsibility, and Size Ceiling of Union Council of Ministers under Articles 75 and 361.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 183Question →

Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional provisions governing Money Bills and the legislative powers of the Governor in a State Legislature:

1. A Money Bill can be introduced in either House of a bicameral State Legislature with the prior recommendation of the Governor.
2. If any question arises whether a Bill is a Money Bill or not, the decision of the Speaker of the State Legislative Assembly thereon shall be final.
3. The Governor cannot return a Money Bill passed by the State Legislature for its reconsideration.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 2 and 3 only

Answer

The correct option is the one stating that statements 2 and 3 only are correct.
Statement 2 is correct as Article 199(3) vests exclusive and final authority in the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly to decide whether a Bill is a Money Bill. Statement 3 is correct as Article 200 precludes the Governor from returning a Money Bill for legislative reconsideration because it was introduced with the Governor's prior recommendation. Statement 1 is incorrect because Article 198 states that a Money Bill cannot be introduced in the Legislative Council.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Statement 1 regarding introduction of Money Bills
Under Article 198 of the Indian Constitution, a Money Bill shall not be introduced in a Legislative Council. It can only originate in the Legislative Assembly. Thus, Statement 1 is incorrect.
Constitutional restriction on upper houses in financial matters.
2
Analyze Statement 2 regarding certification of a Money Bill
Under Article 199(3), if any question arises whether a Bill is a Money Bill or not, the decision of the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly is final. Thus, Statement 2 is correct.
Assembly Speaker holds sole authority over bill classification.
3
Analyze Statement 3 regarding Governor's options for Money Bills
Under Article 200, when a Money Bill is presented to the Governor, the Governor may give assent, withhold assent, or reserve it for the President, but CANNOT return it to the House for reconsideration. Thus, Statement 3 is correct.
Money Bills are introduced with the Governor's prior recommendation, removing the rationale for returning them.

Key Concept

Procedure for Money Bills and Governor's Assent in State Legislature (Articles 198, 199, and 200)
Question 184Question →

Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional jurisdiction and scope of writs under Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution of India:

1. The Supreme Court cannot refuse to entertain an application under Article 32 on the ground that an alternative legal remedy is available, because the right to move the Supreme Court under Article 32 is itself a guaranteed Fundamental Right.
2. The High Court's writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is wider in subject-matter scope than that of the Supreme Court under Article 32.
3. The judicial review power of High Courts to issue writs under Article 226 forms an integral part of the basic structure of the Constitution and cannot be excluded even by a constitutional amendment.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1, 2 and 3

Answer

Statements 1, 2, and 3 are all correct.
All three statements are constitutionally sound. Statement 1 is correct because Article 32 is itself a guaranteed fundamental right, meaning the Supreme Court cannot deny relief on the grounds of alternative remedies. Statement 2 is correct because High Courts can issue writs for both fundamental rights and legal rights ('for any other purpose'). Statement 3 is correct as the 7-judge bench in L. Chandra Kumar (1997) declared judicial review under Articles 32 and 226 to be part of the unamendable basic structure of the Constitution.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate Statement 1 regarding Article 32 status
Statement 1 is correct. Article 32 is enshrined in Part III of the Constitution as a Fundamental Right. Therefore, accessing the Supreme Court under Article 32 is a constitutional duty of the court, and an alternative remedy cannot be a bar to entertaining the petition.
Article 32 provides a guaranteed remedy, whereas High Court writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is discretionary.
2
Evaluate Statement 2 regarding subject-matter scope of Articles 32 and 226
Statement 2 is correct. Article 32 can be invoked exclusively for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, whereas Article 226 can be invoked for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights as well as 'for any other purpose' (ordinary legal rights). Thus, the subject-matter scope of High Courts is wider.
The phrase 'for any other purpose' expands Article 226 beyond Fundamental Rights.
3
Evaluate Statement 3 regarding basic structure doctrine and Article 226
Statement 3 is correct. In L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997), a 7-judge Constitution Bench held that the power of judicial review over legislative actions vested in High Courts under Article 226 (and Supreme Court under Article 32) forms an essential feature of the basic structure of the Constitution.
Constitutional amendments excluding judicial review under Article 226 are unconstitutional.

Key Concept

Writ Jurisdiction and Basic Structure Doctrine (Articles 32 & 226)
Question 185Question →

Regarding the constitutional safeguards ensuring the independence of key constitutional authorities in India, which of the following provisions correctly applies to BOTH the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) and the Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC)?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: They become completely ineligible for any further employment under the Government of India or the Government of any State after ceasing to hold their respective offices.

Answer

Both the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) and the Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) are completely ineligible for any further employment under the Government of India or any State Government after demitting office.
To maintain absolute independence from executive influence, both Article 148(4) (for the CAG) and Article 319(a) (for the Chairman of the UPSC) stipulate that upon relinquishing their respective positions, these officials are entirely disqualified from holding any subsequent office or employment under the Union or State governments.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze post-retirement restrictions for CAG and UPSC Chairman.
Under Article 148(4), the CAG is barred from further office under the GoI or State Governments. Under Article 319(a), the Chairman of the UPSC is similarly barred from further employment under the GoI or State Governments.
This guarantees independence from executive influence or future political inducements.
2
Evaluate removal procedures for both authorities.
The CAG is removed via Parliamentary address identical to a Supreme Court Judge (Article 148(1)). The UPSC Chairman is removed by the President following a Supreme Court inquiry under Article 317(1).
The removal grounds and parliamentary mechanics differ between the two positions.
3
Verify financial autonomy and voting mechanisms.
Salaries and administrative expenses for both offices are charged upon the Consolidated Fund of India (Articles 148(6) and 322), which means they are non-votable.
Charged expenditures do not require annual parliamentary votes.

Key Concept

Independence guarantees and post-tenure restrictions of Indian Constitutional Bodies
Question 186Question →

With reference to the Union Legislature in India, which Article of the Constitution of India explicitly provides the legal definition of a 'Money Bill'?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Article 110

Answer

Article 110
Article 110 of the Constitution of India provides the precise definition of a Money Bill, stating that a bill is deemed to be a Money Bill if it contains only provisions dealing with taxation, custody or withdrawal from the Consolidated Fund of India, or regulation of borrowing money by the Union Government.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Recall the constitutional article that contains the definition of a Money Bill.
Article 110 of the Indian Constitution defines a Money Bill as one dealing exclusively with taxation, government borrowing, or expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India.
It is essential to distinguish between the article containing the definition (Article 110) and the article prescribing the legislative procedure (Article 109).

Key Concept

Constitutional provisions defining a Money Bill (Article 110)
Question 187Question →

Consider the following statements regarding the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002, which created a tripartite constitutional framework for education across Part III, Part IV, and Part IVA:

1. It inserted Article 21A in Part III, declaring free and compulsory education for children between the ages of 6 and 14 years as a Fundamental Right.
2. It modified the scope of Article 45 in Part IV (Directive Principles of State Policy) to focus on early childhood care and education for children below the age of six years.
3. It added clause (k) to Article 51A under Part IVA, making it a Fundamental Duty of a parent or guardian to provide educational opportunities to their child aged 6 to 14 years.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1, 2 and 3

Answer

Statements 1, 2, and 3 are all correct.
The correct answer includes all three statements because the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002 enacted a coordinated change across Part III, Part IV, and Part IVA. It introduced Article 21A (Fundamental Right for ages 6–14), modified Article 45 (Directive Principle for children up to 6 years), and added Article 51A(k) (Fundamental Duty of parents/guardians for children aged 6–14).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the impact of the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002 on Part III (Fundamental Rights).
It inserted Article 21A, guaranteeing free and compulsory education to all children of the age of 6 to 14 years as a Fundamental Right.
This elevated primary education to an enforceable right of every child in India.
2
Examine the modification made to Part IV (Directive Principles of State Policy).
Article 45 was substituted to read that the State shall endeavour to provide early childhood care and education for all children until they complete the age of six years.
Since 6–14 years moved to Article 21A, Article 45 was repurposed to cover early childhood care below 6 years.
3
Examine the addition to Part IVA (Fundamental Duties).
Clause (k) was appended to Article 51A, making it the fundamental duty of a parent or guardian to provide opportunities for education to their child or ward aged 6 to 14 years.
This expanded the total number of Fundamental Duties from 10 to 11.

Key Concept

Tripartite Constitutional Alignment on Education via the 86th Amendment
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 188Question →

Which of the following statements regarding the constitutional bodies created for local self-government under the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Acts are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The State Election Commissioner is appointed by the Governor of the State and can be removed from office only in the like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of a High Court.; The State Finance Commission constituted under Article 243-I is tasked with reviewing the financial position of Panchayats and making recommendations for distribution of net tax proceeds.

Answer

The statements confirming that the State Election Commissioner is appointed by the Governor with removal procedures identical to a High Court Judge, and that the State Finance Commission is constituted under Article 243-I to review Panchayat finances, are correct.
Under Articles 243K and 243-I of the Constitution of India, the State Election Commissioner has security of tenure equal to a High Court Judge to ensure independent elections, while the State Finance Commission is constituted by the Governor every five years to advise on local body revenue sharing.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Article 243K regarding the State Election Commission.
Article 243K(2) specifies that the Governor appoints the State Election Commissioner and guarantees constitutional protection by allowing removal only in like manner and on like grounds as a High Court Judge.
To verify the appointment authority, tenure protection, and removal procedure for rural and urban election authorities.
2
Examine Article 243-I and Article 243Y regarding the State Finance Commission.
The Governor constitutes a State Finance Commission every 5 years under Article 243-I (and Article 243Y for municipalities) to recommend measures for improving local government finances and distributing revenue.
To confirm the mandate, constitution interval, and financial scope of the commission.
3
Verify state-level legislative powers and laying requirements for constitutional commission reports.
The Governor determines conditions of service subject to state legislative laws (not UPSC), and commission reports must be laid before the State Legislature with an action-taken memorandum.
To identify incorrect statements regarding regulatory control and report submission procedures.

Key Concept

Constitutional Provisions for State Election Commission and State Finance Commission (Articles 243I and 243K)
Question 189Question →

Two or more states in India may agree to serve their recruitment needs through a Joint State Public Service Commission (JSPSC). What is the legal status of a JSPSC and which authority appoints its Chairman and members?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: It is a statutory body created by an Act of Parliament, and its Chairman and members are appointed by the President of India.

Answer

A Joint State Public Service Commission (JSPSC) is a statutory body created by an Act of Parliament, and its Chairman and members are appointed by the President of India.
A Joint State Public Service Commission (JSPSC) is formed when two or more states pass resolutions in their legislative assemblies requesting a joint commission, leading Parliament to enact a specific law. Consequently, a JSPSC is a statutory body, not a constitutional body. Furthermore, under Article 316 of the Constitution of India, the Chairman and members of a JSPSC are appointed by the President of India.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine the legal creation mechanism of a Joint State Public Service Commission (JSPSC).
Under Article 315(2), when state legislatures pass resolutions requesting a joint commission, Parliament may by law create a JSPSC. Because it comes into existence through parliamentary legislation rather than direct constitutional mandate, it is a statutory body.
Constitutional bodies exist directly by force of the Constitution text, whereas statutory bodies are created by an Act of Parliament.
2
Identify the constitutional authority responsible for appointing JSPSC members.
Under Article 316(1) of the Constitution of India, the Chairman and other members of a JSPSC are appointed by the President of India.
Unlike an SPSC where the Governor makes appointments, a JSPSC serves multiple states, placing appointment authority with the Union executive (the President).

Key Concept

Statutory Nature and Appointment Authority of Joint State Public Service Commission (JSPSC)
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 190Question →

Match the statutory bodies in India listed in List-I with their corresponding enacting Acts of Parliament in List-II.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)
Central Information Commission (CIC)
Central Vigilance Commission (CVC)
National Commission for Women (NCW)

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The National Human Rights Commission pairs with the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993; the Central Information Commission pairs with the Right to Information Act, 2005; the Central Vigilance Commission pairs with the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003; and the National Commission for Women pairs with the National Commission for Women Act, 1990.
Each listed non-constitutional statutory body derives its authority from a dedicated Act of Parliament: the National Human Rights Commission from the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993; the Central Information Commission from the Right to Information Act, 2005; the Central Vigilance Commission from the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003; and the National Commission for Women from the National Commission for Women Act, 1990.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the governing statute for the National Human Rights Commission.
Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993
The NHRC was created by Parliament under this Act to safeguard human rights.
2
Identify the governing statute for the Central Information Commission.
Right to Information Act, 2005
The CIC was constituted as the chief appellate authority under the RTI Act, 2005.
3
Identify the governing statute conferring statutory status on the Central Vigilance Commission.
Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003
Originally established by executive resolution in 1964, the CVC gained statutory status via the 2003 legislation.
4
Identify the governing statute for the National Commission for Women.
National Commission for Women Act, 1990
The NCW was established in January 1992 in accordance with the statutory mandate of the 1990 Act.

Key Concept

Statutory Bodies and Enacting Legislation
Question 191Question →

Under Article 263 of the Constitution of India, who among the following is constitutionally empowered to establish an Inter-State Council to inquire into and advise upon disputes between states?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The President of India

Answer

The President of India is constitutionally authorized under Article 263 to establish an Inter-State Council.
Article 263 of the Indian Constitution authorizes the President of India to establish an Inter-State Council whenever public interest is served by doing so. Following recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission, the Inter-State Council was formally established by a Presidential Order in May 1990.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the relevant Constitutional Article governing inter-state coordination
Article 263 deals with provisions regarding an Inter-State Council.
Understanding the specific constitutional provision clarifies which authority holds the power.
2
Determine the competent authority specified within Article 263
Article 263 mandates that 'if at any time it appears to the President that the public interest would be served by the establishment of a Council... it shall be lawful for the President by order to establish such a Council.'
The power to issue an order setting up the council is directly granted to the executive head of the Union, the President.

Key Concept

Establishment of Inter-State Council under Article 263
Question 192Question →

Consider the following statements regarding the Vice-President of India and the Union Executive:

1. Unlike the election of the President of India, nominated members of both Houses of Parliament are entitled to vote in the election of the Vice-President.
2. A formal resolution seeking the removal of the Vice-President from office may be initiated in either House of Parliament, provided a 14-day advance notice has been given.
3. During any period when the Vice-President acts as President or discharges the functions of the President, the Vice-President does not perform the duties of the office of Chairman of the Council of States (Rajya Sabha).

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 and 3 only

Answer

Statements 1 and 3 are correct.
Statement 1 is correct because Article 66(1) includes nominated members of Parliament in the Vice-Presidential electoral college. Statement 3 is correct because under Article 65 and Article 97, when the Vice-President acts as President, the duties of the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha are suspended for that individual. Statement 2 is incorrect because the removal resolution can originate only in the Rajya Sabha.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate statement 1 regarding the composition of the electoral college for the Vice-President.
Statement 1 is correct.
Under Article 66(1) of the Constitution of India, the Vice-President is elected by members of an electoral college consisting of the members of both Houses of Parliament (including both elected and nominated members). In contrast, under Article 54, nominated members of Parliament cannot vote in the Presidential election.
2
Evaluate statement 2 regarding the removal procedure for the Vice-President.
Statement 2 is incorrect.
Under Article 67(b), a resolution to remove the Vice-President can only be initiated in the Council of States (Rajya Sabha), passed by an effective majority (majority of all the then members), and agreed to by the House of the People (Lok Sabha). It cannot be initiated in the Lok Sabha.
3
Evaluate statement 3 regarding executive duties when acting as President.
Statement 3 is correct.
Under Article 65(1) read with Article 97, while the Vice-President acts as President or discharges the functions of the President, he/she does not perform the duties of the office of Chairman of the Council of States and is not entitled to salary/allowances attached to the Chairman's post.

Key Concept

Constitutional election, removal procedure, and executive role of the Vice-President of India.
Question 193Question →

Match the following judicial instruments and doctrines of the Indian Judiciary listed in List-I with their corresponding legal principles or landmark origins in List-II:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Writ of Quo-Warranto
Writ of Certiorari
Relaxation of Locus Standi
Curative Petition

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct matches are: Writ of Quo-Warranto matches with the inquiry into the legality of a person's claim to a public office; Writ of Certiorari matches with quashing an order passed in excess of jurisdiction; Relaxation of Locus Standi matches with formalization in S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981); and Curative Petition matches with evolution in Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra (2002).
The matching correctly pairs each judicial instrument with its foundational definition or landmark legal source. Quo-Warranto scrutinizes public office holdings, Certiorari quashes jurisdictional excesses, PIL locus standi relaxation originates from the landmark S.P. Gupta case, and Curative Petitions stem from Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the nature of the Writ of Quo-Warranto.
Quo-Warranto directly tests the legal title of a person occupying a substantive public office, matching the description of inquiring into the claim to a public office.
It prevents unauthorized occupation of public positions.
2
Analyze the nature and function of the Writ of Certiorari.
Certiorari is issued against judicial/quasi-judicial bodies to quash existing illegal orders, matching the quashing of orders issued in excess of jurisdiction.
Unlike prohibition (which stops pending proceedings), certiorari quashes completed decisions.
3
Examine the origin of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) and locus standi expansion.
The traditional rule of locus standi was expanded in S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981) to allow third parties to litigate for public injury.
This case laid the foundational jurisprudential framework for PIL in India.
4
Identify the origin and principle behind Curative Petitions.
Curative Petitions were created in Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra (2002) as a rare remedy following the dismissal of a review petition under Article 137.
It ensures complete justice under Article 142 while maintaining finality of judgments.

Key Concept

Constitutional Writs, Judicial Remedies, and Landmark Judicial Doctrines of the Indian Judiciary
Question 194Question →

Arrange the following sequential stages involved in the enactment of an Ordinary Bill in the Indian Parliament, starting from its introduction to its final stage.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological order of stages in passing an Ordinary Bill is: (1) First Reading (Introduction), (2) Second Reading (Clause-by-clause consideration), (3) Third Reading (Voting on the bill as a whole), and (4) Presidential Assent.
The standard legislative procedure in the Indian Parliament for an Ordinary Bill follows five main stages: First Reading (introduction and gazette publication), Second Reading (general discussion, committee scrutiny, and clause-by-clause consideration with amendments), Third Reading (voting on the bill as a whole), transmission to the other House for identical process, and finally, Presidential Assent under Article 111.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the initial legislative stage
The process begins with First Reading (Introduction of the Bill and publication in the official Gazette).
A bill cannot undergo debate or amendment until it is formally introduced into a House of Parliament.
2
Identify the detailed examination stage
The Second Reading involves clause-by-clause discussion and voting on proposed amendments.
This is the most critical stage where the detailed provisions of the bill are scrutinized and modified.
3
Identify the approval stage in the introducing House
The Third Reading involves voting on the Bill as a whole.
No substantive amendments are allowed at this stage; members either accept or reject the finalized text.
4
Identify the final constitutional requirement for enactment
Presentation to the President of India for assent.
Under Article 111 of the Constitution, a bill passed by Parliament becomes an Act only after receiving Presidential assent.

Key Concept

Legislative Procedure for Ordinary Bills in Indian Parliament
Question 195Question →

With reference to the constitutional authority and obligations of the Governor, Chief Minister, and State Legislature in an Indian State, which of the following statements are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Before giving a decision on the disqualification of a member of the State Legislature under Article 192, the Governor is constitutionally bound to obtain and act according to the opinion of the Election Commission.; The Chief Minister is constitutionally required under Article 167 to communicate all decisions of the Council of Ministers relating to state administration and legislative proposals to the Governor.

Answer

The statement regarding the Governor being bound by the opinion of the Election Commission on member disqualification under Article 192 and the statement regarding the Chief Minister's duty under Article 167 to furnish Council of Ministers decisions to the Governor are both correct.
The correct options are the statement regarding Article 192 (where the Governor is bound by the Election Commission's opinion on disqualification questions) and the statement regarding Article 167 (which details the Chief Minister's constitutional obligation to communicate Council of Ministers decisions to the Governor). Both statements accurately state the constitutional law.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the constitutional mechanism for member disqualifications under Article 192.
Confirm that for disqualifications under Article 191(1), the Governor decides after obtaining the opinion of the Election Commission of India and must act strictly according to such opinion.
Article 192(2) explicitly mandates that the Governor act according to the opinion of the Election Commission.
2
Examine the constitutional duties of the Chief Minister towards the Governor under Article 167.
Confirm that the Chief Minister is duty-bound to communicate cabinet decisions and legislative proposals to the Governor.
Article 167 establishes the Chief Minister as the primary channel of communication between the Council of Ministers and the Governor.
3
Evaluate the limitation on the Governor's pardoning powers regarding death sentences under Article 161.
Identify that while the Governor can suspend, remit, or commute a death sentence, the power to pardon a death sentence belongs solely to the President under Article 72.
Attributing complete pardoning power for death sentences to the Governor conflates Presidential and Gubernatorial prerogatives.
4
Verify the adjudicating authority for disqualification under the Anti-Defection Law (Tenth Schedule).
Confirm that the Presiding Officer of the Legislative House (Speaker/Chairman) holds the power to decide defection cases, not the Governor.
The Tenth Schedule places the power of deciding disqualifications due to defection with the Presiding Officer of the House concerned.

Key Concept

Constitutional Roles, Duties, and Disqualification Mechanisms of the Governor, Chief Minister, and State Legislature
Question 196Question →

Match the Constitutional Provisions listed under List-I with their corresponding Objectives or Scope described under List-II:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Article 20(3)
Article 38(2)
Article 48A
Article 51A(f)

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Article 20(3) corresponds to protection against self-incrimination; Article 38(2) corresponds to the directive to minimize inequalities in income, status, facilities, and opportunities; Article 48A corresponds to the mandate for the State to protect the environment, forests, and wildlife; and Article 51A(f) corresponds to the duty of citizens to value and preserve the rich heritage of composite culture.
Article 20(3) provides fundamental right protection against self-incrimination. Article 38(2) is a DPSP introduced by the 44th Amendment requiring the State to minimize inequalities in income, status, facilities, and opportunities. Article 48A is a DPSP introduced by the 42nd Amendment requiring the State to protect the environment, forests, and wildlife. Article 51A(f) is a Fundamental Duty under Part IVA obligating citizens to preserve composite culture.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the Fundamental Right provision under Part III
Article 20(3) explicitly protects an accused person from being compelled to testify against themselves (protection against self-incrimination).
Part III provisions constitute justiciable Fundamental Rights protecting personal liberties.
2
Identify the Directive Principles of State Policy under Part IV
Article 38(2) directs the State to minimize economic and social inequalities, whereas Article 48A mandates the protection of environment, forests, and wildlife by the State.
Part IV sets out non-justiciable constitutional directives guiding State policymaking and governance.
3
Identify the Fundamental Duty under Part IVA
Article 51A(f) articulates the moral obligation of citizens to value and preserve the nation's composite cultural heritage.
Part IVA enumerates duties expected from citizens to uphold national ethos and unity.

Key Concept

Constitutional classification and provisions across Part III (Fundamental Rights), Part IV (Directive Principles of State Policy), and Part IVA (Fundamental Duties).
Question 197Question →

With reference to the constitutional provisions governing the State Executive and State Legislature in India, which of the following statements are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Governor is constitutionally required to reserve a bill passed by the State Legislature for the consideration of the President if it endangers the constitutional position of the High Court.; A resolution passed by a Legislative Assembly for the creation or abolition of a Legislative Council under Article 169 requires a special majority of total membership and two-thirds of members present and voting.

Answer

The correct statements are the mandatory reservation of High Court-affecting bills under Article 200 and the special majority requirement for Legislative Council creation or abolition under Article 169.
The statement regarding High Court powers is correct because Article 200 makes reservation of such bills mandatory to maintain judicial independence. The statement regarding Article 169 is correct because creating or abolishing a State Legislative Council requires an Assembly resolution passed by a special majority before Parliament can enact relevant legislation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the Governor's mandatory reservation powers under Article 200
Confirm that bills derogating from High Court powers must be reserved for the President
Article 200 explicitly mandates reservation if a bill endangers the constitutional position of the High Court.
2
Analyze the scope of pardoning power under Article 161 versus Article 72
Identify that only the President can grant a pardon for death sentences
While the Governor can commute or suspend a death sentence, the power to grant a complete pardon for death sentences is reserved exclusively for the President.
3
Examine the legislative procedure under Article 169 for State Legislative Councils
Confirm the requirement of a special majority in the Legislative Assembly
Creation or abolition of a Legislative Council requires an Assembly resolution supported by a majority of total membership and at least two-thirds of members present and voting.
4
Verify presidential timelines under Article 201 regarding reserved state bills
Confirm there is no six-month time limit in the Constitution
The Constitution specifies no time limit for the President's action on reserved bills.

Key Concept

Constitutional Prerogatives and Legislative Procedures of State Executive and Legislature
Question 198Question →

Which of the following represents the correct sequential order of the procedural stages involved in the presentation and enactment of the Annual Financial Statement (Budget) in the Indian Parliament, from commencement to completion?

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence for the enactment of the Budget in Parliament is: Presentation of the Budget → General Discussion → Scrutiny by Departmentally Related Standing Committees → Voting on Demands for Grants → Passing of the Appropriation Bill → Passing of the Finance Bill.
The enactment of the Budget (Annual Financial Statement under Article 112) follows a strict six-stage constitutional procedure in the Indian Parliament: 1. Presentation of Budget in Lok Sabha, 2. General Discussion in both Houses, 3. Scrutiny of Demands for Grants by Departmentally Related Standing Committees (DRSCs) during recess, 4. Voting on Demands for Grants exclusively in the Lok Sabha (Article 113), 5. Passing of the Appropriation Bill (Article 114) to authorize withdrawal from the Consolidated Fund of India, and 6. Passing of the Finance Bill to legalize taxation proposals.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the initial legislative act of the financial year.
The process begins with the presentation of the Annual Financial Statement under Article 112.
The executive must lay the budget estimates before Parliament prior to any legislative deliberation.
2
Trace the initial legislative discussion and committee referral stages.
General Discussion occurs first, followed by the recess period where Departmentally Related Standing Committees scrutinize individual ministry demands.
General discussion sets the macro-economic context before committee-level micro-examination of specific grants.
3
Differentiate the voting stage and financial authorization legislation.
Lok Sabha votes on Demands for Grants, followed immediately by the passage of the Appropriation Bill, and concluding with the Finance Bill.
Expenditure authorization (Appropriation Bill under Article 114) must precede tax enactment (Finance Bill) to finalize budget completion.

Key Concept

Procedural Stages of Budget Enactment in Indian Parliament
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 199Question →

Under Part IX of the Constitution of India (73rd Constitutional Amendment Act), which of the following provisions correctly governs the tenure and election requirements of a Panchayat constituted upon the premature dissolution of an existing Panchayat?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The newly constituted Panchayat continues only for the remainder of the period for which the dissolved Panchayat would have continued.

Answer

A Panchayat constituted upon the dissolution of a Panchayat before the expiration of its duration continues only for the remainder of the period for which the dissolved Panchayat would have continued.
According to Article 243E(4) of Part IX of the Constitution, a Panchayat constituted upon the dissolution of a Panchayat before the expiration of its duration shall continue only for the remainder of the period for which the dissolved Panchayat would have continued had it not been so dissolved.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the constitutional tenure provision under Article 243E of the Constitution of India.
Article 243E(1) sets the standard duration of every Panchayat at five years from the date appointed for its first meeting.
Establishing the normal baseline duration of a local self-government body.
2
Examine the rules for premature dissolution under Article 243E(3) and Article 243E(4).
Elections following dissolution must be completed within six months. Furthermore, Article 243E(4) specifies that the newly elected body serves only the remainder of the original five-year period.
Determining the exact constitutional rule governing reconstituted bodies.
3
Evaluate the proviso concerning short remaining tenures.
If the unexpired period is less than six months, holding fresh elections for the remaining duration is not mandatory.
Verifying edge-case conditions regarding elections after dissolution.

Key Concept

Duration of Panchayats and rules governing premature dissolution under Article 243E of the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 200Question →

Regarding the statutory mandate, organizational structure, and operational framework of the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) in India, which of the following statements are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Central Vigilance Commission was originally established by an executive resolution in 1964 on the recommendations of the Santhanam Committee and was subsequently granted statutory status by an Act of Parliament in 2003.; The Central Vigilance Commissioner holds office for a term of four years from the date of entering office or until attaining the age of sixty-five years, whichever is earlier, and is ineligible for re-employment under the Central or State government.

Answer

The correct statements are that the Central Vigilance Commission was initially set up by executive resolution in 1964 on Santhanam Committee recommendations before gaining statutory status in 2003, and that the Central Vigilance Commissioner serves a four-year tenure (or up to age 65) with a bar on subsequent government employment.
The statements highlighting the CVC's establishment in 1964 via the Santhanam Committee recommendations followed by statutory status in 2003, along with its designated 4-year / 65-year age limit tenure and prohibition on further government employment, accurately reflect the provisions of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the historical origin and statutory evolution of the Central Vigilance Commission.
The CVC was established via an executive resolution in 1964 following the recommendations of the K. Santhanam Committee on Prevention of Corruption, and Parliament later enacted the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003, making it a statutory body.
Verifies the accurate historical sequence and legislative foundation of the body.
2
Evaluate the composition of the Selection Committee for the appointment of the Central Vigilance Commissioner.
The statutory selection committee consists of three members: the Prime Minister (Chairperson), the Minister of Home Affairs, and the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha. The Chief Justice of India is not part of this selection panel.
Distinguishes CVC appointment mechanisms from other bodies like Lokpal or the National Human Rights Commission where judicial officers serve on selection panels.
3
Examine the tenure, age limit, and post-tenure eligibility provisions of the Central Vigilance Commissioner.
Under Section 5 of the CVC Act, 2003, the Commissioner holds office for 4 years or until reaching 65 years of age (whichever is earlier) and cannot accept further employment under the Union or State governments.
Confirms statutory tenure limits and post-retirement disqualification rules.
4
Assess the administrative status and reporting authority of the Commission.
The CVC is an autonomous body not subordinate to the Ministry of Law and Justice or any executive department; it submits its annual report to the President of India.
Ensures proper understanding of institutional independence and reporting hierarchy.

Key Concept

Statutory framework, appointment procedure, tenure, and autonomy of the Central Vigilance Commission under the CVC Act, 2003.
PreviousPage 10 / 16Next
Indian Polity and Governance Practice Questions — State PSC Exam — Page 10 | Examkin