Examkin

Indian Polity and Governance

316 questions

All types316Multiple choice161Multiple select68Matching74Ordering13
Question 161Question →

Match the Constitutional Articles concerning the Union Executive in List-I with their specific constitutional provisions in List-II:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Article 61
Article 71
Article 77
Article 78

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Article 61 matches with the procedure for impeachment of the President; Article 71 matches with inquiry and decision by the Supreme Court on presidential/vice-presidential election disputes; Article 77 matches with conduct of business of the Government of India in the President's name; and Article 78 matches with duties of the Prime Minister regarding the furnishing of information to the President.
Article 61 deals with the procedure for impeachment of the President. Article 71 establishes that election disputes involving the President or Vice-President are inquired into and decided by the Supreme Court. Article 77 provides that all executive actions of the Government of India shall be expressed in the name of the President. Article 78 delineates the duties of the Prime Minister to furnish information regarding administration and legislation to the President.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the constitutional safeguards and dispute mechanisms associated with the President and Vice-President under Articles 61 and 71.
Article 61 prescribes the quasi-judicial procedure for impeaching the President, whereas Article 71 confers exclusive original jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to adjudicate presidential and vice-presidential election disputes.
Distinguishing between parliamentary removal mechanisms and judicial election dispute resolution is essential for executive accountability.
2
Examine the executive conduct and communication provisions under Articles 77 and 78.
Article 77 mandates that all Union executive actions be taken in the name of the President, while Article 78 outlines the Prime Minister's mandatory reporting duties to the President.
These constitutional mandates govern the formal execution of governance and maintain the vital link between the Cabinet and the Head of State.
3
Synthesize the analysis to form the exact matching pairs between List-I and List-II.
Article 61 pairs with impeachment procedure; Article 71 pairs with Supreme Court election dispute decisions; Article 77 pairs with conduct of executive business; and Article 78 pairs with Prime Minister's reporting duties.
Ensures precise alignment with constitutional articles governing the Union Executive under Part V of the Constitution of India.

Key Concept

Constitutional Articles governing impeachment, election disputes, executive conduct, and prime ministerial duties within the Union Executive
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 162Question →

Which of the following Articles of the Constitution of India explicitly empowers Parliament to restrict or abrogate the Fundamental Rights of members of the Armed Forces, forces charged with the maintenance of public order, and intelligence agencies?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Article 33

Answer

Article 33 explicitly empowers Parliament to restrict or abrogate the Fundamental Rights of members of the Armed Forces, police forces, and intelligence bureaus.
Article 33 of the Indian Constitution empowers Parliament to enact laws determining the extent to which Fundamental Rights apply to members of the Armed Forces, police forces, intelligence agencies, and telecommunication systems established for security forces, ensuring proper discharge of their duties and maintenance of discipline.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the relevant Article in Part III of the Constitution that deals with armed forces personnel.
Article 33 specifically addresses the rights of armed forces, paramilitary forces, police, and intelligence personnel.
The Constitution provides special provisions to ensure proper discipline and duty fulfillment among security personnel.
2
Distinguish Article 33 from adjacent Articles (Articles 34 and 35).
Article 34 relates to martial law restrictions, whereas Article 35 grants law-making power to Parliament for implementing Part III.
Conflating constitutional numbers for Part III exceptions leads to incorrect option selection.

Key Concept

Parliamentary power under Article 33 to restrict Fundamental Rights of armed forces
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 163Question →

Match the following Parliamentary Motions and Devices of the Indian Parliament in List-I with their specific procedural characteristics or legal requirements in List-II:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Adjournment Motion
Calling Attention Motion
Privilege Motion
Censure Motion

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct matches pair Adjournment Motion with requiring 50 members' support to discuss an urgent matter while carrying censure, Calling Attention Motion with seeking a Minister's statement on urgent public importance without interrupting business, Privilege Motion with addressing a breach caused by withholding or distorting facts, and Censure Motion with stating specific charges against ministers without mandating immediate cabinet resignation upon passage.
Adjournment Motion involves an emergency interruption requiring 50 members' support and implies censure. Calling Attention Motion is an Indian parliamentary innovation seeking an official ministerial statement. Privilege Motion holds ministers accountable for misleading the House or withholding facts. Censure Motion requires explicit grounds and can target specific ministers or the entire cabinet without automatically collapsing the government.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the procedural threshold and nature of an Adjournment Motion.
It requires the support of at least 50 members for leave to be granted, interrupts standard business, and implies censure of government conduct.
It is an extraordinary motion reserved exclusively for urgent matters of immediate concern in Lok Sabha.
2
Identify the distinct origin and purpose of a Calling Attention Motion.
It is an Indian parliamentary creation introduced in 1954 to elicit an official ministerial statement without suspending regular proceedings.
It allows members to highlight urgent public matters formally within rules of procedure.
3
Determine the legal grounds for moving a Privilege Motion.
It is moved when a Minister gives wrong or distorted information or suppresses facts, breaching parliamentary privilege.
Ensures executive accountability regarding accurate communication to the legislature.
4
Evaluate the conditions and consequences of a Censure Motion.
It must state specific reasons/charges and can target individual ministers or the cabinet as a whole; passing it does not force cabinet resignation, unlike a No-Confidence Motion.
Censure is meant to reprimand specific policies or actions, whereas No-Confidence tests overall majority support.

Key Concept

Parliamentary Devices and Legislative Motions in the Indian Parliament
Question 164Question →

Match the following constitutional writs issued by the Indian Judiciary under Articles 32 and 226 with their respective literal Latin meanings:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Habeas Corpus
Mandamus
Prohibition
Quo-Warranto

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Habeas Corpus pairs with 'To have the body of', Mandamus pairs with 'We command', Prohibition pairs with 'To forbid', and Quo-Warranto pairs with 'By what authority or warrant'.
Each writ originates from English common law and possesses an exact Latin translation: Habeas Corpus means 'To have the body of', Mandamus means 'We command', Prohibition means 'To forbid', and Quo-Warranto means 'By what authority or warrant'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the literal Latin meaning of Habeas Corpus.
Habeas Corpus means 'To have the body of'.
It is an order produced to bring a detained person before the court.
2
Identify the literal Latin meaning of Mandamus.
Mandamus means 'We command'.
It commands a public official to execute a legal or constitutional obligation.
3
Identify the literal Latin meaning of Prohibition.
Prohibition means 'To forbid'.
It stops lower judicial or quasi-judicial bodies from taking up matters outside their jurisdiction.
4
Identify the literal Latin meaning of Quo-Warranto.
Quo-Warranto means 'By what authority or warrant'.
It prevents illegal usurpation of a public office by challenging the holder's authority.

Key Concept

Literal meanings and definitions of Writs under Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution of India
Estimated Time:45s
Question 165Question →

Arrange the following significant events in the framing of the Constitution of India in their correct chronological order from earliest to latest:

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence from earliest to latest is: Introduction of the Objectives Resolution (December 13, 1946) → Adoption of the Objectives Resolution (January 22, 1947) → Adoption of the National Flag (July 22, 1947) → Constitution of the Drafting Committee (August 29, 1947).
The correct sequence begins with the introduction of the Objectives Resolution by Jawaharlal Nehru on December 13, 1946, followed by its unanimous adoption on January 22, 1947. Next, the Constituent Assembly adopted the National Flag on July 22, 1947. Finally, the Drafting Committee was formed on August 29, 1947.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the exact date for the introduction of the Objectives Resolution.
December 13, 1946.
Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru moved the Objectives Resolution outlining the fundamentals and philosophy of the constitutional structure during the inaugural session.
2
Identify the exact date when the Constituent Assembly formally passed/adopted the Objectives Resolution.
January 22, 1947.
After detailed debate, the Assembly unanimously adopted the resolution which later formed the preamble of the Constitution.
3
Determine the date when the National Flag was officially adopted by the Constituent Assembly.
July 22, 1947.
The Tricolour with the Ashoka Chakra was adopted as the National Flag just prior to Indian independence.
4
Determine the date when the Drafting Committee was established.
August 29, 1947.
Post-independence, the Assembly appointed a seven-member Drafting Committee chaired by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar to prepare a draft Constitution.

Key Concept

Chronological timeline of key procedural milestones and committees in the framing of the Indian Constitution.
Question 166Question →

Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional provisions and operational frameworks of the Election Commission of India and the Finance Commission:

1. The Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners hold office for a term of six years or until they attain the age of 65 years, whichever is earlier.
2. The recommendations made by the Finance Commission regarding the distribution of net proceeds of taxes between the Union and the States are legally binding on the Union Government.
3. The Constitution of India has not specified the educational or legal qualifications of the members of the Election Commission of India, nor has it debarred retiring election commissioners from further government appointments.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 and 3 only

Answer

The correct response consists of statements 1 and 3 only.
The combination of statements 1 and 3 is correct. Under Article 324 and statutory provisions, Election Commissioners serve a 6-year term or until age 65. Furthermore, the Constitution omits specific member qualifications and does not restrict retiring commissioners from accepting further executive appointments. Meanwhile, Finance Commission recommendations under Article 280 are non-binding and advisory.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate Statement 1 regarding the tenure of Election Commissioners.
Statement 1 is correct. The Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners hold office for a term of 6 years or up to 65 years of age, whichever occurs earlier.
This tenure rule is established under parliamentary legislation governing the service conditions of Election Commissioners pursuant to Article 324.
2
Evaluate Statement 2 regarding the legal nature of Finance Commission recommendations.
Statement 2 is incorrect. The recommendations of the Finance Commission (constituted under Article 280) are advisory in nature and not legally binding on the Executive or Parliament.
The Constitution does not explicitly make the recommendations binding, though established convention leads the Union Government to accept tax-sharing formulas.
3
Evaluate Statement 3 regarding qualifications and post-retirement restrictions for Election Commissioners.
Statement 3 is correct. The Constitution does not prescribe legal, administrative, or educational qualifications for members of the Election Commission, nor does it explicitly bar retiring members from further appointments by the government.
Unlike the UPSC members or CAG (who face strict disqualification from subsequent government service), the Constitution leaves ECI qualification and post-retirement rules open.

Key Concept

Constitutional provisions, tenure safeguards, and advisory scope of the Election Commission of India and Finance Commission
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 167Question →

Who among the following presides over a joint sitting of both Houses of Parliament convened under Article 108 of the Constitution of India?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Speaker of the Lok Sabha

Answer

The Speaker of the Lok Sabha
According to Article 118(4) of the Constitution of India, the Speaker of the Lok Sabha presides over a joint sitting of both Houses of Parliament. In the absence of the Speaker, the Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha presides, followed by the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha if the Deputy Speaker is also absent.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the constitutional provision governing joint sittings of Parliament.
Article 108 of the Constitution of India provides for a joint sitting of both Houses to resolve a legislative deadlock over an ordinary bill.
Understanding the context of joint sittings in the Union Legislature.
2
Determine the designated presiding authority under Article 118(4).
According to Article 118(4), the Speaker of the Lok Sabha presides over a joint sitting of both Houses.
The Speaker represents the directly elected chamber of Parliament.

Key Concept

Presiding Authority at Joint Sittings of Parliament
Question 168Question →

Match the Panchayati Raj committees in List I with their landmark structural recommendations in List II.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Balwant Rai Mehta Committee (1957)
Ashok Mehta Committee (1977)
G.V.K. Rao Committee (1985)
L.M. Singhvi Committee (1986)

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Balwant Rai Mehta Committee matches with establishment of a 3-tier Panchayati Raj system; Ashok Mehta Committee matches with replacement of the 3-tier structure with a 2-tier system; G.V.K. Rao Committee matches with making the district the main planning unit and creating the post of District Development Commissioner; L.M. Singhvi Committee matches with constitutional recognition of Panchayati Raj institutions and setting up of Nyaya Panchayats.
Each historical committee on Panchayati Raj corresponds directly to its signature proposal: Balwant Rai Mehta (1957) advocated for a 3-tier system of democratic decentralisation; Ashok Mehta (1977) advocated for a 2-tier structure (Zilla Parishad & Mandal Panchayat); G.V.K. Rao (1985) focused on district-level planning and the District Development Commissioner post; and L.M. Singhvi (1986) spearheaded the demand for constitutional recognition and Nyaya Panchayats.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the recommendation of the Balwant Rai Mehta Committee (1957).
It laid the foundation of democratic decentralisation by recommending a 3-tier Panchayati Raj structure (Gram Panchayat, Panchayat Samiti, Zilla Parishad).
To create a representative decentralised administrative system.
2
Analyze the recommendation of the Ashok Mehta Committee (1977).
It proposed collapsing the tiers into a 2-tier system comprising Zilla Parishad at the district level and Mandal Panchayat at the lower level.
To strengthen district-level administration and group smaller villages under Mandal Panchayats.
3
Analyze the recommendation of the G.V.K. Rao Committee (1985).
It highlighted the phenomenon of 'grass without roots' (bureaucratisation) and recommended making the district the key unit for planning, led by a District Development Commissioner.
To integrate rural development administration under local democratic control.
4
Analyze the recommendation of the L.M. Singhvi Committee (1986).
It advocated for constitutional protection/recognition of local self-government bodies and the creation of Nyaya Panchayats.
To ensure regular elections, financial autonomy, and judicial mechanisms at the village cluster level.

Key Concept

Committees on Panchayati Raj Institutions and Their Key Recommendations
Question 169Question →

With reference to the Constitutional powers and executive role of the President of India, consider the following statements:

1. The power of the President to grant pardons under Article 72 extends to sentences imposed by a Court Martial, whereas the Governor possesses no such power under Article 161.
2. The 44th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1978 made the advice tendered by the Council of Ministers unconditionally binding on the President upon first submission.
3. Under Article 78, it is the constitutional duty of the Prime Minister to furnish such information relating to the administration of affairs of the Union as the President may call for.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 and 3 only

Answer

The correct answer is the option stating that only statements 1 and 3 are correct.
The option selecting statements 1 and 3 is correct. Under Article 72(1)(a), only the President possesses the authority to grant pardons for sentences awarded by a Court Martial. Under Article 78(b), the Prime Minister is constitutionally obligated to furnish administrative information requested by the President. Statement 2 is false because the 44th Amendment Act of 1978 empowered the President to return advice to the Council of Ministers for one-time reconsideration under Article 74(1).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate Statement 1 regarding pardoning power differences between the President and Governor.
Statement 1 is correct. Under Article 72, the President can grant pardons, reprieves, respites, or remissions in all cases where the punishment is by a Court Martial. Article 161 does not confer court-martial pardoning powers on the Governor.
Constitutional provisions under Article 72 specifically delineate military court sentences within the exclusive domain of the Union Executive head.
2
Evaluate Statement 2 regarding the impact of the 44th Constitutional Amendment Act on Article 74.
Statement 2 is incorrect. The 42nd Amendment Act (1976) made ministerial advice binding on the President. The 44th Amendment Act (1978) amended Article 74(1) by adding a proviso that allows the President to require the Council of Ministers to reconsider such advice once, though the reconsidered advice remains binding.
The 44th Amendment restored a limited check by giving the President the power of reconsideration.
3
Evaluate Statement 3 regarding Presidential information rights under Article 78.
Statement 3 is correct. Article 78(b) explicitly establishes the duty of the Prime Minister to furnish information relating to the administration of the affairs of the Union and proposals for legislation as the President may call for.
Article 78 defines the communication link between the Prime Minister and the President.

Key Concept

Union Executive Constitutional Framework: Article 72, Article 74 (42nd and 44th Amendments), and Article 78
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 170Question →

Under the Constitution of India, the President may seek the opinion of the Supreme Court on a question of law or fact of public importance under which of the following provisions?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Article 143

Answer

Article 143
Article 143 of the Constitution of India explicitly empowers the President of India to consult the Supreme Court on questions of law or fact that are of public importance or relate to pre-constitution disputes.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the specific constitutional power being inquired about in the question.
The core requirement is identifying the constitutional provision that grants the President the right to seek advisory opinion from the Supreme Court.
The President relies on constitutional authorization to seek non-binding legal opinions from the apex court.
2
Recall the relevant article governing Advisory Jurisdiction under Part V of the Constitution.
Article 143 specifically deals with the power of the President to consult the Supreme Court.
Article 143 enables presidential references on questions of law/fact of public importance or pre-constitution treaties.

Key Concept

Advisory Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 143
Question 171Question →

Consider the following statements regarding the powers, removal procedures, and functions of the Presiding Officers of the Indian Parliament:

1. The decision of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha as to whether a Bill is a Money Bill is final, and the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha possesses no power or authority to certify any Bill as a Money Bill.
2. In the absence of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha presides over a joint sitting of both Houses of Parliament summoned under Article 108.
3. While the Speaker of the Lok Sabha can be removed from office by a resolution passed by an effective majority of the Lok Sabha alone, the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha can be removed only if a resolution for their removal as Vice-President is passed by an effective majority of the Rajya Sabha and agreed to by a simple majority of the Lok Sabha.
4. The decision of the Speaker regarding the disqualification of a member of the Lok Sabha under the Tenth Schedule (Anti-Defection Law) is final and completely immune from judicial review.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 and 3 only

Answer

Statements 1 and 3 are correct. The Chairman of the Rajya Sabha does not preside over joint sittings, and the Speaker's disqualification decisions under the Tenth Schedule are subject to judicial review.
Statements 1 and 3 accurately describe constitutional provisions. Statement 1 correctly identifies the exclusive prerogative of the Lok Sabha Speaker under Article 110(3) to certify a Money Bill. Statement 3 accurately details the removal procedure under Article 94(c) for the Speaker (effective majority of Lok Sabha) and under Article 67(b) for the Vice-President/Chairman (effective majority in Rajya Sabha accepted by simple majority in Lok Sabha). Statements 2 and 4 are false.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate Statement 1 regarding Money Bill certification
Under Article 110(3) of the Constitution, if any question arises whether a Bill is a Money Bill or not, the decision of the Speaker of the House of the People is final. The Chairman of the Rajya Sabha has no such jurisdiction.
Verify constitutional powers of the Lok Sabha Speaker versus the Rajya Sabha Chairman under financial procedures.
2
Evaluate Statement 2 regarding Joint Sitting presidency
According to the rules of procedure and Article 118(4), a joint sitting is presided over by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, or in their absence by the Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha, or in their absence by the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha. The Chairman of the Rajya Sabha (Vice-President) NEVER presides over a joint sitting because they are not a Member of Parliament.
Check procedural order of precedence for Joint Sittings under Article 108 and Article 118.
3
Evaluate Statement 3 regarding removal procedures
Under Article 94(c), the Speaker can be removed by a resolution of the Lok Sabha passed by a majority of all the then members of the House (effective majority). Under Article 67(b), the Vice-President (ex-officio Chairman of Rajya Sabha) is removed by a resolution of the Council of States passed by a majority of all the then members of the Council (effective majority) and agreed to by the House of the People (simple majority).
Examine constitutional provisions governing the removal of Lok Sabha Speaker vs Vice-President of India.
4
Evaluate Statement 4 regarding Anti-Defection Law and judicial review
In the landmark judgment Kihoto Hollohan vs Zachillhu (1992), the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court declared Paragraph 7 of the Tenth Schedule unconstitutional and held that the Speaker while deciding defection questions acts as a tribunal, making their orders subject to judicial review under Articles 136, 226, and 227.
Assess legal precedents regarding immunity under the Tenth Schedule.

Key Concept

Constitutional powers, removal mechanics, and judicial boundaries of Parliamentary Presiding Officers in India.
Question 172Question →

Which of the following statements regarding the Central Information Commission (CIC) of India are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: It is a statutory body established under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005.; The Chief Information Commissioner is appointed by the President of India on the recommendation of a committee.

Answer

The statements confirming that the Central Information Commission is a statutory body created under the Right to Information Act, 2005, and that its Chief Information Commissioner is appointed by the President of India on the recommendation of a committee are both correct.
The Central Information Commission is a statutory body established by the Right to Information Act, 2005. Its Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioners are appointed by the President of India on the recommendation of a statutory selection committee.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the legal framework establishing the Central Information Commission.
The Commission was created under Section 12 of the RTI Act, 2005, which classifies it as a statutory body.
Statutory bodies are created by specific parliamentary legislation rather than constitutional articles or executive notifications.
2
Verify the appointment authority and selection process.
Under the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005, the President appoints the Chief Information Commissioner following recommendations from a committee chaired by the Prime Minister.
Determining the appointing body confirms statutory governance rules.

Key Concept

Statutory non-constitutional bodies and governance under the RTI Act, 2005
Question 173Question →

With reference to the constitutional developments under British rule, consider the following statements regarding the Charter Act of 1853:

1. It separated, for the first time, the legislative and executive functions of the Governor-General's Council.
2. It established the office of the Secretary of State for India, vesting in it absolute administrative authority.
3. It introduced local representation for the first time in the Indian (Central) Legislative Council.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 and 3 only

Answer

1 and 3 only
The option stating '1 and 3 only' is correct because the Charter Act of 1853 established a distinct Legislative Council for the Governor-General, separating legislative functions from executive duties and introducing local representation from provincial governments. Statement 2 is incorrect as the office of the Secretary of State for India was established under the Government of India Act of 1858.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Statement 1 regarding the separation of council functions.
Statement 1 is correct.
The Charter Act of 1853 separated, for the first time, the legislative and executive functions of the Governor-General's Council by adding six new members called legislative councillors.
2
Analyze Statement 2 regarding the creation of the Secretary of State for India.
Statement 2 is incorrect.
The creation of the office of the Secretary of State for India was introduced by the Government of India Act of 1858 following the Revolt of 1857, which abolished the Board of Control and Court of Directors.
3
Analyze Statement 3 regarding local representation in the Legislative Council.
Statement 3 is correct.
The Charter Act of 1853 introduced local representation for the first time, stipulating that four out of the six new legislative members were to be appointed by the local (provincial) governments of Madras, Bombay, Bengal, and Agra.

Key Concept

Charter Act of 1853 and structural administrative evolution
Question 174Question →

Under the 74th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992, incorporated in Part IX-A of the Constitution of India, what is the minimum population threshold specified for a Municipality to mandatorily constitute Wards Committees within its territorial area?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 3 lakh or more

Answer

A population of 3 lakh (300,000) or more
According to Article 243S of the Indian Constitution introduced by the 74th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992, every Municipality having a population of 3 lakh or more is constitutionally bound to set up Wards Committees consisting of one or more wards within its area.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the relevant Constitutional provision under the 74th Amendment Act
Part IX-A, Article 243S governs the constitution and composition of Wards Committees.
The question explicitly asks for the mandatory threshold of Wards Committees in Urban Local Bodies.
2
Verify the numerical population requirement stipulated in Article 243S(1)
Article 243S(1) states: 'There shall be constituted Wards Committees, consisting of one or more wards, within the territorial area of a Municipality having a population of three lakhs or more.'
This establishes 3 lakh as the constitutional minimum population requirement for creating Wards Committees.

Key Concept

Constitution of Wards Committees under Article 243S (74th Constitutional Amendment Act)
Question 175Question →

With reference to the constitutional framework and statutory provisions governing the removal of a High Court Judge in India, which of the following statements are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A High Court judge can only be removed from office by an order of the President on the grounds of proved misbehaviour or incapacity, following the same procedure prescribed for a Supreme Court judge.; Upon admission of a removal motion, the investigation into the charges is conducted by a statutory three-member committee consisting of a Supreme Court judge, a High Court Chief Justice, and a distinguished jurist.

Answer

The correct statements are that a High Court judge is removed following the same procedure and grounds as a Supreme Court judge, and that the statutory investigation upon admission of the removal motion is conducted by a three-member committee comprising a Supreme Court judge, a High Court Chief Justice, and a distinguished jurist.
The removal mechanism for High Court judges is constitutionally anchored in Article 217(1) proviso (b), which mandates identical grounds and procedure as Article 124(4) for Supreme Court judges. Furthermore, the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 prescribes that upon admission of a removal notice, a statutory three-member panel comprising a Supreme Court judge, a High Court Chief Justice, and a distinguished jurist must investigate the charges.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Examine the constitutional relationship between High Court and Supreme Court judge removal procedures.
Article 217(1) proviso (b) explicitly links the removal of a High Court judge to Article 124(4), establishing identical grounds ('proved misbehaviour or incapacity') and identical procedure.
Constitutional provisions guarantee judicial independence by ensuring uniform removal security across higher judiciary.
2
Analyze the statutory procedure under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 regarding motion admission and investigation committee composition.
The Presiding Officer of the House has the legal discretion to accept or reject the motion. If admitted, a 3-member committee (Supreme Court judge, High Court Chief Justice, and distinguished jurist) investigates the charges.
Parliamentary statutory procedure regulates the investigation details prior to voting on the address.
3
Evaluate the requirement of parliamentary address and executive power limits.
The President cannot act on Collegium recommendations for removal; an address passed by special majorities in both Houses of Parliament during the same session is an indispensable constitutional prerequisite.
Executive interference in judicial removal is prohibited to preserve separation of powers.

Key Concept

Constitutional and statutory framework for the removal of higher judiciary judges under Article 124(4), Article 217, and the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.
Question 176Question →

Match the Constitutional Authorities/Officers in List-I with their corresponding Constitutional Safeguards/Conditions of Service in List-II:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Chief Election Commissioner
Comptroller and Auditor General of India
Chairman of a State Public Service Commission
Member of the Union Public Service Commission

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The Chief Election Commissioner pairs with removal in like manner as a Supreme Court Judge; the Comptroller and Auditor General of India pairs with total ineligibility for further government employment; the Chairman of a State Public Service Commission pairs with appointment by the Governor but removal exclusively by the President; and a Member of the Union Public Service Commission pairs with eligibility to become Chairman of UPSC or SPSC while being barred from other government jobs.
The correct pairings accurately reflect constitutional provisions: Article 324(5) protects the Chief Election Commissioner with Supreme Court Judge removal parity; Article 148(4) completely debars the CAG from subsequent public employment; Article 316/317 creates a federal safeguard where the Governor appoints but only the President can remove an SPSC Chairman; and Article 319(c) restricts UPSC members to chairmanships of UPSC/SPSC only.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the removal security of the Chief Election Commissioner.
Article 324(5) explicitly equates the removal process and grounds of the CEC to those of a Supreme Court Judge.
Ensures independence of conduct of elections from political executive control.
2
Determine post-retirement restrictions for the Comptroller and Auditor General.
Article 148(4) imposes a complete ban on future government employment under Union or State governments.
Prevents executive inducement or conflict of interest during audit oversight.
3
Analyze appointment vs removal authority for the Chairman of a State Public Service Commission.
The Governor appoints the SPSC Chairman, but removal authority rests solely with the President under Article 317(1).
Guarantees functional independence from state executive interference.
4
Evaluate career progression rules for a UPSC member under Article 319.
A member can only be elevated to Chairman of UPSC or Chairman of an SPSC; all other public employment is prohibited.
Maintains strict neutrality while preserving internal promotion avenues within public service commissions.

Key Concept

Constitutional safeguards, appointing authorities, removal procedures, and post-retirement eligibility rules for constitutional officers.
Question 177Question →

Match the Constitutional Articles governing the State Executive and State Legislature in List-I with their corresponding provisions in List-II:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Article 165
Article 178
Article 202
Article 210

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Article 165 matches with the appointment and duties of the Advocate General for the State; Article 178 matches with the election of the Speaker and Deputy Speaker of the Legislative Assembly; Article 202 matches with the laying of the Annual Financial Statement; and Article 210 matches with the language to be used in the State Legislature.
Each constitutional Article correctly corresponds to its specific state governance mandate: Article 165 provides for the Advocate General for the State, Article 178 mandates the Speaker and Deputy Speaker of the Legislative Assembly, Article 202 specifies the laying of the Annual Financial Statement, and Article 210 regulates the language to be used in the State Legislature.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the constitutional article establishing the highest law officer in the State Executive.
Article 165 governs the office of the Advocate General for the State.
The Advocate General performs legal duties for the state government as appointed by the Governor under Article 165.
2
Identify the article specifying presiding officers of the State Legislative Assembly.
Article 178 deals with the election of the Speaker and Deputy Speaker.
Article 178 mandates the Assembly to choose its Speaker and Deputy Speaker from among its members.
3
Identify the articles governing legislative financial procedure and language rules.
Article 202 mandates the Annual Financial Statement (State Budget), and Article 210 establishes rules regarding the language used in legislative proceedings.
Financial statements in states are presented under Article 202, whereas official transaction language in the legislature is specified under Article 210.

Key Concept

Constitutional provisions for the State Executive and Legislature
Question 178Question →

With reference to the Indian Constitution, which of the following provisions were added to Part IV (Directive Principles of State Policy) or Part IVA (Fundamental Duties) by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976? Select all correct options.

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: To secure opportunities for the healthy development of children (Article 39); To promote equal justice and to provide free legal aid to the poor (Article 39A); To safeguard public property and to abjure violence (Article 51A(i))

Answer

The provisions added by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 are: securing opportunities for healthy development of children (Article 39), promoting equal justice and providing free legal aid to the poor (Article 39A), and safeguarding public property and abjuring violence (Article 51A).
The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 incorporated four new Directive Principles of State Policy: Article 39 (securing opportunities for the healthy development of children), Article 39A (equal justice and free legal aid), Article 43A (participation of workers in management of industries), and Article 48A (protection of environment and wildlife). Additionally, it added Part IVA (Article 51A) creating Fundamental Duties, which includes the duty to safeguard public property and abjure violence.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Examine the Directive Principles of State Policy added by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976.
The 42nd Amendment added four new Directive Principles: Article 39 (opportunities for healthy development of children), Article 39A (equal justice and free legal aid), Article 43A (participation of workers in management of industries), and Article 48A (protection and improvement of environment and safeguarding of forests and wildlife).
Determining which DPSPs were incorporated in 1976.
2
Examine the origin of Fundamental Duties under Part IVA.
The 42nd Amendment Act added Part IVA containing Article 51A upon the recommendations of the Swaran Singh Committee, introducing 10 Fundamental Duties, including the obligation to safeguard public property and abjure violence.
Determining the origin of constitutional provisions regarding duties.
3
Analyze the constitutional history of Article 45.
The provision regarding early childhood care for children until the age of six years was substituted under Article 45 by the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002, which also introduced Article 21A as a Fundamental Right.
Identifying the correct constitutional amendment for Article 45.

Key Concept

Constitutional Amendments incorporating Directive Principles of State Policy and Fundamental Duties
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 179Question →

Regarding Financial Emergency under Article 360 of the Constitution of India, which of the following statements are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A proclamation of Financial Emergency must be approved by both Houses of Parliament within two months from the date of its issue.; During the operation of a Financial Emergency, the President can issue directions to reduce the salaries and allowances of Supreme Court and High Court judges.

Answer

The correct statements are that a proclamation of Financial Emergency must be approved by both Houses of Parliament within two months, and that the President can issue directions to reduce the salaries and allowances of Supreme Court and High Court judges during its operation.
The correct provisions are that a Financial Emergency proclamation must be approved within two months by both Houses of Parliament and that the President holds constitutional authority to direct salary reductions for judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts during its operation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the parliamentary approval timeframe for Financial Emergency under Article 360.
Article 360 stipulates a two-month timeframe for approval by both Houses of Parliament after proclamation by the President.
Establishing the constitutional requirement for legislative concurrence.
2
Examine executive powers regarding salary reductions during Financial Emergency.
The executive authority extends to reducing salaries of constitutional positions, including Supreme Court and High Court judges.
Verifying the economic control mechanisms authorized under Article 360.
3
Evaluate duration/extension rules and historical application of Article 360.
No periodic six-month re-approval is needed once passed, and Article 360 has never been invoked in Indian history.
Distinguishing Financial Emergency rules from National Emergency rules and confirming historical facts.

Key Concept

Financial Emergency provisions under Article 360 of the Constitution of India
Question 180Question →

Match the parliamentary terms related to the functioning of the Indian Parliament in Column-I with their correct procedural descriptions in Column-II.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Prorogation
Adjournment sine die
Quorum
Dissolution

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Prorogation matches with ending a session of the House by the President; Adjournment sine die matches with terminating a sitting for an indefinite period; Quorum matches with the minimum membership requirement of one-tenth to conduct business; and Dissolution matches with bringing an end to the life of the Lok Sabha.
Each parliamentary procedural term is correctly paired with its constitutionally specified definition: Prorogation terminates a session via Presidential order, Adjournment sine die suspends a sitting without a specified reassembly date via the Presiding Officer, Quorum establishes the 10% minimum attendance requirement under Article 100(3), and Dissolution terminates the tenure of the Lok Sabha.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze 'Prorogation'
Matches with terminating a session of the House by the President.
Prorogation ends an entire session, unlike an adjournment which only suspends a sitting.
2
Analyze 'Adjournment sine die'
Matches with terminating a sitting for an indefinite period.
'Sine die' literally means without fixing a day; it is exercised by the Speaker/Chairman.
3
Analyze 'Quorum'
Matches with one-tenth of total membership required to conduct proceedings.
Under Article 100(3), a sitting cannot officially take place without this minimum attendance.
4
Analyze 'Dissolution'
Matches with ending the life of the Lok Sabha.
Rajya Sabha is a permanent body not subject to dissolution, whereas Lok Sabha dissolves after its term or on presidential order.

Key Concept

Parliamentary Sittings, Sessions, and Procedural Terminology
Estimated Time:45s
PreviousPage 9 / 16Next
Indian Polity and Governance Practice Questions — State PSC Exam — Page 9 | Examkin