An intensive care unit team is managing a 72-year-old woman who sustained a massive ischemic stroke. She is unresponsive and lacks medical decision-making capacity. Her clinical prognosis is extremely poor, and she is unlikely to regain meaningful cognitive function.
The patient has a legally valid, signed Durable Power of Attorney for Healthcare designating her longtime friend as her healthcare proxy. The friend presents the document to the medical team and requests that the patient be transitioned to comfort care. The friend explains that the patient repeatedly expressed a desire never to be kept alive on life support without hope of recovery.
Shortly after, the patient's adult daughter arrives at the hospital. The daughter is distraught and insists that all life-sustaining measures, including placement of a percutaneous feeding tube, be initiated immediately. The daughter states she is the legal next of kin and threatens legal action if her mother's care is de-escalated. The patient's chart does not contain a separate written living will.
Based on standard legal and ethical principles, which of the following is the most appropriate action for the physician?
- ARequire the friend and the daughter to reach a mutual consensus before altering the patient's current level of care
- BTransfer decision-making authority to the daughter because the friend's claims cannot be honored without a written living will
- Follow the directives of the friend, as a designated healthcare proxy holds legal priority over next of kinAnswer
- DPostpone the transition to comfort care until a judge formally resolves the dispute and determines the patient's legal competence
- EFollow the directives of the daughter, because immediate biological family members legally supersede non-relatives