Question

Difficulty: EasyAdvance Directives and Surrogate Decision Making

An intensive care unit team is managing a 72-year-old woman who sustained a massive ischemic stroke. She is unresponsive and lacks medical decision-making capacity. Her clinical prognosis is extremely poor, and she is unlikely to regain meaningful cognitive function.

The patient has a legally valid, signed Durable Power of Attorney for Healthcare designating her longtime friend as her healthcare proxy. The friend presents the document to the medical team and requests that the patient be transitioned to comfort care. The friend explains that the patient repeatedly expressed a desire never to be kept alive on life support without hope of recovery.

Shortly after, the patient's adult daughter arrives at the hospital. The daughter is distraught and insists that all life-sustaining measures, including placement of a percutaneous feeding tube, be initiated immediately. The daughter states she is the legal next of kin and threatens legal action if her mother's care is de-escalated. The patient's chart does not contain a separate written living will.

Based on standard legal and ethical principles, which of the following is the most appropriate action for the physician?

  1. A
    Require the friend and the daughter to reach a mutual consensus before altering the patient's current level of care
  2. B
    Transfer decision-making authority to the daughter because the friend's claims cannot be honored without a written living will
  3. Follow the directives of the friend, as a designated healthcare proxy holds legal priority over next of kinAnswer
  4. D
    Postpone the transition to comfort care until a judge formally resolves the dispute and determines the patient's legal competence
  5. E
    Follow the directives of the daughter, because immediate biological family members legally supersede non-relatives

Answer

The most appropriate action is to follow the directives of the friend, because a legally designated healthcare proxy holds absolute priority over next of kin in medical decision-making.
When a patient lacks decision-making capacity, the medical team must turn to a surrogate decision-maker. If the patient has completed a Durable Power of Attorney for Healthcare, the individual named in that document (the healthcare proxy) holds the highest legal priority. The proxy's authority supersedes the default statutory surrogate hierarchy, which typically dictates that next of kin (such as spouses or adult children) make decisions. In this scenario, the physician is legally and ethically obligated to follow the friend's substituted judgment over the daughter's demands.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine the patient's ability to make medical decisions.
The patient is unresponsive and lacks clinical decision-making capacity.
This confirms that a surrogate decision-maker must be utilized.
2
Identify the legally authorized surrogate decision-maker.
The patient has a valid Durable Power of Attorney for Healthcare designating her friend as her proxy.
A designated proxy explicitly chosen by the patient overrides the default statutory surrogate hierarchy.
3
Address the conflicting demands from the patient's daughter.
The physician must respectfully decline the daughter's demands and follow the proxy's instructions.
The proxy is legally empowered to enact the patient's wishes (substituted judgment), superseding any demands made by biological family members.

Key Concept

A formally designated healthcare proxy (via a Durable Power of Attorney for Healthcare) holds legal precedence over all other individuals, including statutory next of kin, when making medical decisions for an incapacitated patient.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Rate this question