A 62-year-old woman is evaluated in the hospital two weeks after suffering a massive ischemic stroke. She is currently aphasic, bedbound, and lacks decision-making capacity. She has failed multiple swallow evaluations, and the medical team recommends the placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube for long-term enteral nutrition. The patient is a widow and has never completed an advance directive or designated a healthcare proxy. Furthermore, she had never discussed her preferences regarding artificial nutrition with her family.
Three family members are present to discuss her care plan:
- Her 35-year-old son requests that the PEG tube be placed to sustain her life.
- Her 85-year-old mother, who resides with the patient, refuses the procedure, feeling it would only prolong suffering.
- Her 60-year-old brother, who holds a Durable Power of Attorney for Finances, also refuses the procedure, asserting his legal authority.
Which of the following is the most appropriate next step regarding the patient's medical care?
- AWithhold the PEG tube placement as directed by the mother
- BDelay the procedure until all three family members reach a unanimous consensus
- Proceed with the PEG tube placement as directed by the sonAnswer
- DWithhold the PEG tube placement as directed by the brother
- ERequest a court-appointed medical guardian to make the decision due to family conflict