Emergency medical services arrive at the hospital with an 84-year-old male resident of an assisted living facility. The patient has a documented history of advanced Alzheimer disease and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and is currently experiencing acute hypercapnic respiratory failure triggered by pneumonia. Upon evaluation in the resuscitation bay, he is lethargic, displays profound work of breathing, and is entirely incapable of participating in discussions about his care. The attending physician determines that mechanical ventilation via endotracheal intubation is clinically indicated.
The patient's wife is deceased. His estranged son, who resides nearby, rushes to the hospital presenting a notarized "Durable Power of Attorney for Finances" and insists on aggressive measures, stating, "I hold the power of attorney; you must intubate him now." Shortly thereafter, the patient's niece—his dedicated caregiver for the past five years—presents a legally executed "Durable Power of Attorney for Healthcare" naming her as his proxy. The niece firmly requests comfort-focused measures, explaining that her uncle had repeatedly emphasized he never wished to be sustained by a ventilator.
Which of the following represents the most appropriate course of action for the physician?
- AIntubate the patient, as the son's financial power of attorney authorizes him to dictate interventions that incur significant medical costs.
- BIntubate the patient, because the son supersedes a niece in the statutory surrogate hierarchy for incapacitated adults.
- CIntubate the patient under the emergency consent doctrine to preserve life until the conflicting directives can be formally mediated.
- Withhold intubation and initiate comfort measures, as the niece possesses designated medical authority and is exercising substituted judgment.Answer
- EWithhold intubation and rely on the best interest standard, given that the patient does not have a formal written living will on file.