A 71-year-old man is evaluated on the neurology ward one week after suffering a massive left middle cerebral artery infarction. He exhibits severe global aphasia and right hemiplegia. His clinical condition is hemodynamically stable, but he has severe dysphagia and cannot safely swallow. The primary care team has determined that he lacks clinical decision-making capacity. The interdisciplinary team recommends percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement for long-term enteral nutrition.
The patient's wife of two years presents to the hospital with a valid Durable Power of Attorney for Financial Affairs, which she states gives her authority over all his assets, including medical expenditures. She strongly requests that the PEG tube be placed.
The patient's adult son from a previous marriage arrives with a legally executed Durable Power of Attorney for Healthcare from five years ago, naming the son as the patient's healthcare proxy. The son refuses the procedure, stating his father repeatedly told him, "If I am ever permanently paralyzed and unable to talk, I would never want to be kept alive on a feeding tube."
The wife argues that her current status as the legal spouse and financial agent overrides the older healthcare document.
Which of the following is the most appropriate course of action?
- Cancel the procedure as directed by the son acting as the designated healthcare proxy.Answer
- BPerform the procedure because the wife's financial power of attorney grants authority over medical care costs.
- CPerform the procedure because a current legal spouse holds highest priority in the statutory surrogate hierarchy.
- DSeek a judicial ruling of legal incompetence before honoring the surrogate's refusal of life-sustaining treatment.
- EProceed with the procedure based on the clinical best interest standard since there is no written living will specifying feeding tube refusal.