A 71-year-old man with a history of congestive heart failure is admitted to the intensive care unit with urosepsis. He is profoundly delirious, unable to demonstrate understanding of his medical situation, and lacks clinical decision-making capacity. His respiratory status rapidly deteriorates due to acute respiratory distress syndrome, and the attending physician determines that endotracheal intubation is required for stabilization.
The patient's son and daughter are both present at the bedside. The son presents a valid Durable Power of Attorney for Finances and states, "Dad has a living will that says 'no breathing machines.' I handle all of his legal and financial affairs, and I am instructing you to just keep him comfortable." The daughter presents a valid Medical Power of Attorney (Healthcare Proxy) designating her as the patient's healthcare agent. She states, "We discussed this extensively. He only meant he didn't want machines if he had an irreversible, terminal condition. He would definitely want temporary help to survive a treatable infection. Please intubate him."
Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- Intubate the patient in accordance with the daughter's directive.Answer
- BProvide comfort care only in accordance with the son's directive.
- CProvide comfort care only based on the explicit instructions in the living will.
- DPostpone the intubation until an ethics committee can convene to mediate the family dispute.
- EObtain a psychiatric consultation to formally assess the patient's legal competence to make his own decision.