Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumAdvance Directives and Surrogate Decision Making

A 32-year-old woman is currently managed in the intensive care unit for acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to severe viral pneumonitis. She has been mechanically ventilated and deeply sedated for the past two weeks. The critical care team determines that a tracheostomy is now medically indicated to facilitate weaning from the ventilator. The patient is unmarried, and her parents are deceased. She has lived with her long-term boyfriend for the past eight years. Her only living relative is an older sister who resides in a neighboring state. The patient has no written advance directive and has not legally designated a healthcare proxy. When discussing the proposed procedure, the boyfriend adamantly refuses the tracheostomy, stating he is certain she would never want to live with a 'hole in her neck.' The sister is contacted by telephone and requests that the medical team proceed with the tracheostomy to give the patient the best chance at recovery. Which of the following is the most appropriate course of action for the physician?

  1. Follow the sister's directive because she is the legally recognized surrogate decision-maker.Answer
  2. B
    Follow the boyfriend's directive because he is most likely to accurately represent the patient's values.
  3. C
    Postpone the procedure indefinitely until the boyfriend and sister can reach a unanimous consensus.
  4. D
    Request a psychiatric evaluation to formally determine the patient's legal competence to decide.
  5. E
    Transfer the patient to a long-term care facility without performing the tracheostomy.

Answer

The physician should follow the directive of the patient's sister, as she is the legally authorized surrogate decision-maker.
When a patient lacks decision-making capacity and has no advance directive or legally designated healthcare proxy (such as a durable power of attorney for healthcare), physicians must rely on the statutory surrogate hierarchy to obtain consent. While state laws can vary slightly, the standard hierarchy prioritizes a legal spouse, followed by adult children, parents, and then adult siblings. Although the boyfriend may have intimate knowledge of the patient's values due to their long-term cohabitation, he has no automatic legal standing to make medical decisions on her behalf. Therefore, the adult sister is the legally recognized surrogate, and her directive regarding the tracheostomy should be followed.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Assess the patient's ability to make medical decisions.
The patient is deeply sedated and mechanically ventilated, meaning she lacks clinical decision-making capacity.
Before turning to a surrogate, the physician must confirm the patient cannot make decisions for herself.
2
Check for formal advance directives or a designated healthcare proxy.
No written advance directive or durable power of attorney for healthcare exists.
A legally designated proxy or written directive always supersedes the default statutory surrogate hierarchy.
3
Apply the statutory surrogate hierarchy to the available individuals.
The hierarchy is spouse > adult children > parents > adult siblings. The sister is the highest-ranking legally recognized relative.
Without formal legal documentation, unmarried partners do not have surrogate decision-making authority, regardless of the length or closeness of the relationship.

Key Concept

In the absence of a designated healthcare proxy or advance directive, medical decisions for an incapacitated patient are governed by a statutory surrogate hierarchy. Unmarried partners generally have no legal standing without explicit formal designation.
Rate this question

Topics

Advance Directives and Surrogate Decision Making

More questions from this topic