Tüm alıştırma soruları

5556 soru

Soru 1281Soru

For all non-zero real numbers aa, bb, and cc, which of the following is equivalent to the expression a(bc)b(ac)c\frac{a(b - c) - b(a - c)}{c}?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: bab - a

Cevap

bab - a
Applying the distributive property to the numerator yields abacba+bcab - ac - ba + bc. Since multiplication is commutative, ba=abba = ab, allowing us to cancel the abab and ba-ba terms. This leaves bcacbc - ac in the numerator. Factoring out cc gives c(ba)c(b - a). Dividing the entire numerator by the denominator cc simplifies the expression to bab - a.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Apply the distributive property to expand the terms in the numerator.
a(bc)b(ac)=abacba+bca(b - c) - b(a - c) = ab - ac - ba + bc
Distribute aa to both bb and c-c, and distribute b-b to both aa and c-c. Remember that multiplying two negative numbers yields a positive result, so b×c=bc-b \times -c = bc.
2
Combine like terms in the expanded numerator.
abacab+bc=bcacab - ac - ab + bc = bc - ac
Since multiplication is commutative, ba=abba = ab. Thus, the terms abab and ab-ab cancel each other out to zero.
3
Factor out the common term cc from the numerator and divide by the denominator cc.
c(ba)c=ba\frac{c(b - a)}{c} = b - a
Factoring out cc from bcacbc - ac gives c(ba)c(b - a). Dividing by cc cancels the common factor in the numerator and denominator, leaving the simplified expression.

Anahtar Kavram

Order of Operations and Number Properties
Soru 1282Soru

In laboratory settings, biologists have observed New Caledonian crows fashioning hooks from twigs, this tool-making ability, which represents a capacity to create tools, allows them to extract grubs from deep tree cavities.

Which choice most clearly and concisely replaces the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: which

Cevap

The correct answer is the option that uses 'which' to create a clear, concise, and grammatically correct sentence without redundancy or punctuation errors.
The correct choice, 'which', is the most concise and grammatically correct option. It avoids the redundancy of repeating the concept of 'tool-making' and 'capacity to create tools' in the same sentence. It also resolves the comma splice by turning the second clause into a dependent relative clause that modifies the preceding action.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the underlined portion for redundant phrasing.
The phrase 'this tool-making ability' and 'which represents a capacity to create tools' are redundant because they express the exact same concept.
ACT English requires the elimination of unnecessary words and redundant synonyms.
2
Check the grammatical relationship between the clauses.
The sentence begins with an independent clause. The underlined portion begins a new clause. Joining them with a comma creates a comma splice.
Two independent clauses cannot be joined with just a comma; a coordinating conjunction, a semicolon, or a restructuring to make one clause dependent is required.
3
Evaluate the remaining options for conciseness and correctness.
Replacing the underlined portion with the relative pronoun 'which' connects the clauses properly, removes all redundancy, and is the most concise solution.
Using 'which' turns the second part of the sentence into a dependent relative clause, resolving both the comma splice and the redundancy.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating Redundancy
Soru 1283Soru

In 1811, twelve-year-old Mary Anning and her brother Joseph discovered the fossilized skull of an ichthyosaur along the cliffs of Lyme Regis. At that point in time during those days, people did not yet understand the concept of extinction, so they initially assumed the skull belonged to a crocodile.

Which choice provides the most clear and concise wording for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: At that time, people did not yet understand the concept of extinction, so they

Cevap

At that time, people did not yet understand the concept of extinction, so they
The correct option is the most concise choice. It simplifies the temporal reference to a single, clear phrase ('At that time') and uses the active voice ('people did not yet understand') while maintaining the necessary coordinating conjunction ('so') to connect the two independent clauses without a comma splice.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the underlined portion for wordiness and redundancy.
The original phrasing contains redundant temporal expressions ('at that point in time' and 'during those days') that can be simplified to a single concise phrase.
ACT English prioritizes conciseness and demands the elimination of unnecessary synonyms.
2
Evaluate the remaining options for grammatical correctness and clarity.
The option that removes the conjunction 'so' creates a comma splice. The option using the passive construction is unnecessarily wordy and weak.
The correct choice must not introduce any new grammatical errors while resolving the wordiness.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating redundancy and passive wordiness while maintaining grammatical standards like avoiding comma splices.
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1284Soru

Unlike oil paints, which remain wet and workable for days, egg tempera dries almost immediately upon application. This rapid drying time prevents artists from blending colors directly on the painting support. [1] For instance, to create the illusion of three-dimensional form, tempera painters must build up layers of color using thousands of tiny, overlapping brushstrokes.

Which choice provides the most logical transition from the preceding sentence to the highlighted sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Instead,

Cevap

The choice 'Instead,' is correct because it logically connects the limitation described in the first sentence with the alternative action described in the second sentence.
The correct choice is 'Instead,' because it establishes the proper relationship between the two sentences. The first sentence describes a limitation (artists cannot blend colors directly due to the fast-drying paint), while the second sentence describes the alternative method they use to create gradients. 'Instead' logically connects the impossible action with its alternative.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the relationship between the two sentences.
The first sentence explains that tempera paint dries too quickly to allow direct color blending. The second sentence explains that artists use tiny, overlapping brushstrokes to create smooth color gradients.
Understanding the logical connection between the ideas is necessary to select the correct transition.
2
Evaluate the logical relationship.
Since blending is impossible, the artists must use a different method. This represents an alternative approach to the problem.
This helps identify what type of transition (e.g., contrast, addition, alternative, cause-effect) is required.
3
Test the options against the identified relationship.
'Instead' accurately represents the choice of an alternative method. Other options like 'For instance' (illustration), 'Likewise' (similarity), and 'Nevertheless' (concession) do not fit the context.
This confirms the correct choice while eliminating the distractors.

Anahtar Kavram

Sentence-Level Transitions
Soru 1285Soru

The historical museum recently acquired a collection of rare maps, these documents, which are currently at this time on display in the main gallery.

Which choice is the most concise and grammatically correct?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: which are

Cevap

The correct answer is the option that replaces the underlined text with 'which are'.
The correct option replaces the underlined portion with a relative pronoun and verb. This creates a grammatically correct relative clause modifying 'maps' and eliminates the redundant repetition of 'currently' and 'at this time'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the error in the original sentence.
The original sentence contains a redundancy error because 'currently' and 'at this time' mean the same thing, and it creates a grammatical fragment because the second clause lacks a main predicate for 'these documents'.
Redundant expressions and sentence fragments must be corrected to make the sentence clear and grammatically correct.
2
Evaluate the choices to find the one that is both grammatically correct and concise.
The choice 'which are' creates a grammatically correct dependent clause that modifies 'maps' and removes the redundant words entirely.
The ACT exam prefers the most concise option that preserves the sentence's intended meaning without introducing grammatical errors.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating Redundancy
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 1286Soru

Designing on the Wing

In the late 1980s, Japan’s high-speed Shinkansen trains faced a major engineering obstacle that threatened their continued expansion: noise pollution. As the trains traveled through narrow mountain tunnels at speeds exceeding 150 miles per hour, they compressed the air ahead of them, creating a high-pressure wave. Upon exiting the tunnel, this compressed air expanded rapidly, producing a deafening sound known as a "tunnel boom" that could be heard over a mile away. The source of the problem was the train’s bullet-shaped nose, which pushed a wall of air forward rather than slicing through it cleanly.

Eiji Nakatsu, the train’s chief engineer and an avid birdwatcher, looked to the natural world for a solution to this mechanical dilemma. He focused on the kingfisher, a predatory bird that dives from the air into water to catch fish. Nakatsu reasoned that if a bird could transition smoothly between two mediums of drastically different densities with barely a splash, a train could do the same when transitioning from the open air into a compressed tunnel. Water and air, though differing in density, behave similarly under fluid dynamic principles.

By redesigning the train's nose to mimic the long, wedge-shaped beak of the kingfisher, Nakatsu’s team succeeded in eliminating the tunnel boom entirely. ________

Which choice provides the most logical and effective conclusion to the passage by highlighting the multiple positive outcomes of the train's new design?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Ultimately, this application of biomimicry not only quieted the Shinkansen trains but also improved their energy efficiency by fifteen percent.

Cevap

Ultimately, this application of biomimicry not only quieted the Shinkansen trains but also improved their energy efficiency by fifteen percent.
The correct option successfully closes the passage by highlighting the dual benefits of the redesign—quieting the train and improving its energy efficiency—while maintaining the established informative tone and meeting all grammatical standards.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt's request for a concluding sentence that highlights multiple positive outcomes of the redesign.
The correct choice must address both the elimination of noise (tunnel boom) and another positive outcome (such as efficiency or speed).
Understanding the specific rhetorical goal allows for targeted evaluation of the options.
2
Evaluate each option for grammatical correctness, ensuring there are no sentence structure errors.
One option contains a comma splice, and another contains a dangling modifier, leaving only two grammatically sound choices.
ACT English questions require standard written English, so grammatically incorrect options must be eliminated.
3
Assess the remaining grammatically correct options for relevance, cohesion, and fulfillment of the rhetorical goal.
The option mentioning other birds introduces unrelated information, while the option summarizing the noise reduction and energy efficiency benefits directly meets the prompt's requirement.
Choosing the option that aligns with the passage's flow and fulfills the specified criteria ensures a logical conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Opening and Concluding Sentences
Soru 1287Soru

The following is an excerpt from a draft of an essay about New York City's postal history.

In the late 1890s, New York City struggled to manage its rapidly growing volume of mail, as horse-drawn wagons routinely became gridlocked in congested streets. To resolve this crisis, the post office installed a network of underground pneumatic tubes that propelled mail canisters beneath the city streets at speeds of up to thirty miles per hour. At its peak, this subterranean network moved millions of letters daily across Manhattan and Brooklyn.

[1] ___________________________________________________________________. In 1918, the federal government suspended funding for the pneumatic system in order to prioritize the war effort. Following the war, the postal service chose to invest in automobile trucks, which could carry larger volumes over greater distances, and by 1953, the last of the city's pneumatic mail tubes were permanently shut down.

Which choice most effectively introduces the second paragraph by establishing its main focus?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: However, the subterranean system's era of dominance proved to be relatively short-lived.

Cevap

The choice that begins with 'However, the subterranean system's era' is the correct answer because it is grammatically complete and establishes the transition to the paragraph's focus on the decline and eventual abandonment of the pneumatic tubes.
The correct choice is grammatically sound and introduces the paragraph's focus on the decline and eventual abandonment of the pneumatic tube system by using the transition word 'However' to contrast with the success described in the first paragraph.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the flow of the passage to identify the topic of the second paragraph.
The first paragraph describes the success of the pneumatic tube system, while the second paragraph describes its suspension, displacement by trucks, and eventual shutdown. The second paragraph's topic is the decline and demise of the system.
This helps determine what kind of introductory sentence is rhetorically appropriate.
2
Evaluate the grammatical correctness of each choice.
One choice is a sentence fragment; another misuses a semicolon to separate a dependent clause; a third introduces an illogical tense shift to the present. Only the transition sentence starting with 'However' is both grammatically correct and logically fitting.
To eliminate grammatically flawed choices and select the one that is correct in both grammar and context.

Anahtar Kavram

Establishing Introductions and Thesis Statements
Soru 1288Soru

Urban Apiaries

[1]
In cities around the world, a new kind of agricultural movement is buzzing on rooftops and balconies. Honeybees are finding comfortable homes on the roofs of high-rise apartment buildings, office towers, and community centers. This practice, known as urban beekeeping, has surged in popularity over the last decade as city residents look for creative ways to support local ecosystems and produce their own food.

[2]
Many people assume that cities are concrete deserts unfriendly to wildlife, but research shows that urban areas can be highly beneficial to pollinators. Rooftop gardens, backyard plots, and city parks provide a surprisingly diverse diet for bees. Unlike large industrial agricultural fields, which often grow only a single crop for miles, cities offer a wide variety of flowers, trees, and ornamental plants that bloom at different times of the year. This botanical diversity helps keep honeybee colonies healthy and resilient against disease.

[3]
[1] For instance, many city dwellers now have access to hyper-local honey, which is sold at neighborhood farmers' markets. Additionally, rooftop hives serve as unique educational tools, teaching school children and community members about the vital role pollinators play in our food systems. Ultimately, these urban apiaries help citizens feel more connected to the natural world.

Which of the following sentences, if added at Point [1] in Paragraph 3, would provide the most effective introduction to the paragraph?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Furthermore, urban beekeeping offers several distinct benefits to local communities.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that urban beekeeping offers several distinct benefits to local communities, as it establishes a transition from the previous paragraph and introduces the main topic of Paragraph 3.
The sentence beginning with 'Furthermore, urban beekeeping' is correct because it provides a clear and logical transition ('Furthermore') from the discussion of bees' health in cities to the discussion of how humans benefit from the practice. It introduces the paragraph's focus on community benefits, which is then directly supported by the examples of honey, education, and nature connection.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main focus and structure of Paragraph 3.
The paragraph details how urban beekeeping benefits city residents through local honey, education, and nature connection.
Understanding the paragraph's supporting details is necessary to determine what central topic the introductory sentence must establish.
2
Evaluate the transition from Paragraph 2 to Paragraph 3.
Paragraph 2 discusses how cities benefit bees. Therefore, the start of Paragraph 3 needs to bridge this with the new topic of how bees benefit the human community.
An effective introduction must connect the previous paragraph's topic to the new paragraph's focus.
3
Evaluate the grammatical and logical fitness of all options.
The sentence starting with 'Furthermore, urban beekeeping' is grammatically correct and logically introduces the community benefits. The other choices contain grammar errors (comma splice, semicolon fragment) or introduce logical flow disruptions.
This step eliminates incorrect distractors to confirm the correct choice.

Anahtar Kavram

Opening and Concluding Sentences
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1289Soru

The following passage contains a blank where a punctuation mark is missing. What punctuation mark should be placed in the blank to ensure the sentence is punctuated correctly?

Aşağıdaki boşlukları doldurun

In the late 1970s, NASA embarked on a grand tour of the outer planets. Launched in 1977, the Voyager 1 spacecraft—the first human-made object to enter interstellar spacecontinues to transmit valuable data back to Earth from billions of miles away. This historic mission has forever changed our understanding of the cosmos.
Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

A dash (—) must be placed in the blank to close the nonessential parenthetical phrase.
The sentence contains a nonessential parenthetical phrase, 'the first human-made object to enter interstellar space,' which describes the Voyager 1 spacecraft. Because this phrase is introduced by a dash, it must be closed with a matching dash to maintain punctuation consistency. Using any other punctuation mark, such as a comma or a semicolon, would result in an incorrect mixture of punctuation styles.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the parenthetical (nonessential) phrase in the sentence.
The phrase is 'the first human-made object to enter interstellar space', which describes 'the Voyager 1 spacecraft'.
Recognizing parenthetical elements helps determine how they should be set off from the rest of the sentence.
2
Check the punctuation mark that introduces the parenthetical phrase.
An em dash (—) is used immediately before the phrase.
Nonessential phrases must be enclosed by matching punctuation marks (either a pair of commas, a pair of parentheses, or a pair of dashes).
3
Determine the correct punctuation mark to close the phrase.
A matching dash (—) must be used at the end of the phrase before the main verb 'continues'.
Using a different punctuation mark, such as a comma or semicolon, would violate the rule of punctuation consistency for nonessential elements.

Anahtar Kavram

Punctuation consistency with nonessential elements
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1290Soru

In 1952, computer pioneer Grace Hopper completed the first compiler, a program that translated English-like instructions into machine code. Previously, programmers had to write code in tedious binary sequences. Hopper’s development, which was a major breakthrough in computer science, revolutionized programming by allowing software to be written in a way that was much easier and simpler for humans to read and write.

Which of the following options represents the most concise and grammatically correct version of the underlined portion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Hopper’s breakthrough revolutionized programming, making software much easier to write.

Cevap

Hopper’s breakthrough revolutionized programming, making software much easier to write.
The correct answer is the most concise option that preserves the original meaning and remains grammatically correct. It condenses 'Hopper's development, which was a major breakthrough' into 'Hopper's breakthrough' and replaces the wordy passive phrase 'by allowing software to be written in a way that was...' with a concise participial phrase 'making software...'. It also eliminates the redundant synonyms 'easier and simpler' and the wordy pair 'read and write'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify redundancy and wordiness in the original underlined sentence.
The phrase 'easier and simpler' is redundant because the words express similar ideas. The phrase 'read and write' is wordy, and the clause 'which was a major breakthrough in computer science' can be condensed to 'breakthrough'.
ACT English conventions prioritize conciseness by eliminating unnecessary synonyms and wordy clauses.
2
Evaluate the remaining options for grammatical correctness and conciseness.
The option containing 'which revolutionized' results in a sentence fragment because there is no main verb. The option with 'it made software' creates a comma splice. The option 'Hopper’s breakthrough revolutionized programming, making software much easier to write.' is grammatically correct and successfully removes all wordy and redundant language.
Identifying and eliminating options that introduce new grammatical errors leads directly to the correct, most effective choice.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating Wordiness
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 1291Soru

Sea otters use rocks to crack open the shells of their prey, which is a behavior that they repeat again and again to access the food inside.

Which choice is the most effective and concise version of the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: a behavior they repeat

Cevap

a behavior they repeat
The correct choice is the most concise option that successfully avoids redundancy. The phrase 'a behavior they repeat' is grammatically sound and communicates the intended message clearly without using repetitive words.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the underlined portion for unnecessary repetition.
The phrase contains both 'repeat' and 'again and again', which mean the same thing.
Identifying redundancy is the first step in finding the most concise and effective phrasing.
2
Evaluate the choices for conciseness and grammatical correctness.
The correct choice removes the repetitive phrase and expresses the idea clearly using a grammatically correct noun phrase modifier, while other options introduce grammatical errors.
Choosing the most concise option that avoids grammar errors like comma splices and fragments ensures proper sentence structure.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating Redundancy
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 1292Soru

To decipher Linear B, classicist Alice Kober built a massive database of paper cards, sorting them into grids to analyze the relationships between grammatical endings. By cataloging grammatical inflections, she determined that the unknown language was inflected, which meant that word endings changed depending on their grammatical function. This detailed card system of hers, which was highly structured and organized in a grid format, was what ultimately laid the groundwork for Michael Ventris to crack the script.

Which of the following alternatives to the underlined portion is the most concise and grammatically correct?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: This structured grid system ultimately laid the groundwork

Cevap

This structured grid system ultimately laid the groundwork
The correct choice is the most concise option that preserves the original meaning and is grammatically correct. It reduces the highly redundant original wording ('system of hers', 'highly structured', 'organized in a grid format') and the wordy construction ('was what ultimately laid') to a direct, active statement: 'This structured grid system ultimately laid the groundwork'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the underlined portion for redundant information and wordiness.
The original text contains several redundant expressions: 'card system of hers' (repetitive ownership), 'highly structured and organized in a grid format' (redundant synonyms for structure), and 'was what ultimately laid' (unnecessarily wordy construction).
ACT English prioritizes the most concise way of expressing an idea without losing meaning or grammatical accuracy.
2
Evaluate the choices to find the most concise option that is grammatically correct.
The correct option reduces the wordy phrase to 'This structured grid system ultimately laid the groundwork', which is grammatically complete, active, and removes all redundancies.
Choosing the most concise option requires verifying that it is grammatically correct and fits the surrounding sentence structure.
3
Check the distractors for grammatical errors introduced during simplification.
The option beginning with 'Her structured grid' creates a fragment by subordinating the main verb. The option with 'that she developed' incorrectly sets off a restrictive clause with commas.
Conciseness cannot come at the expense of proper sentence structure and punctuation.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating Wordiness
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1293Soru

[1] In 1956, Malcom McLean, a former trucking magnate, revolutionized global trade by introducing the standardized shipping container. [2] Before this innovation, cargo was loaded and unloaded piece by piece in a process known as break-bulk shipping, which was slow, labor-intensive, and prone to theft. [3] McLean's system allowed goods to be packed directly into large metal boxes that could be seamlessly transferred between trucks, trains, and ships. [4] Many early dockworkers belonged to powerful labor unions that negotiated wages and working conditions. [5] Consequently, the cost of loading cargo dropped from nearly six dollars a ton to just a few cents, facilitating a massive expansion of international commerce.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 4 from the passage. Should this sentence be kept or deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Deleted, because it introduces details about dockworkers' unions that interrupt the paragraph's discussion of the efficiency and cost-saving benefits of containerization.

Cevap

Deleted, because it introduces details about dockworkers' unions that interrupt the paragraph's discussion of the efficiency and cost-saving benefits of containerization.
The correct answer is the option to delete the sentence because it interrupts the flow of the paragraph. Sentence 3 describes the mechanics of McLean's container system, and Sentence 5 details the financial consequence of that system (the drop in shipping costs). Introducing information about dockworker labor unions in Sentence 4 interrupts this direct cause-and-effect relationship with irrelevant information.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main idea and flow of the paragraph.
The paragraph explains the invention of the standardized shipping container by Malcom McLean and how this system improved efficiency (Sentence 3) and reduced costs (Sentence 5) compared to the old labor-intensive method (Sentence 2).
Understanding the paragraph's focus helps identify which sentences contribute to this focus and which ones distract from it.
2
Evaluate the relevance of Sentence 4 within this context.
Sentence 4 introduces information about dockworkers' labor unions, their wages, and working conditions. This information is tangential to the mechanics of containerization and its economic impact.
This step determines whether the sentence supports the main topic or introduces a distraction.
3
Determine the impact of Sentence 4 on the transition between Sentence 3 and Sentence 5.
Sentence 5 begins with 'Consequently,' which shows a direct cause-and-effect relationship with the efficiency described in Sentence 3. Sentence 4 disrupts this direct logical connection.
Identifying transition disruptions confirms that deleting the sentence improves paragraph cohesion.

Anahtar Kavram

Determining whether to keep or delete a sentence based on its relevance to the paragraph's main idea and its effect on structural cohesion.
Soru 1294Soru

For decades, the scientific community believed the ocean floor was a flat, featureless plain. In the 1950s, geologist Marie Tharp sought to prove otherwise by meticulously plotting sonar data collected from research vessels. Working at her desk at Columbia University, Tharp transformed raw numbers into detailed draft maps, revealing a massive, continuous underwater mountain range known as the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. [1] Her colleague, Bruce Heezen, initially dismissed her discovery, but Tharp’s persistence eventually revolutionized the field of plate tectonics.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence at Point [1]:

'Sonar technology had originally been developed during World War I to detect enemy submarines.'

Should the writer make this addition?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Tharp's mapping work by introducing tangential details about the history of sonar.

Cevap

No, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Tharp's mapping work by introducing tangential details about the history of sonar.
The correct option is the one stating that the writer should not add the sentence because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Tharp's mapping work. The paragraph is tightly focused on Marie Tharp's scientific achievements and her discovery of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Introducing details about the military history of sonar technology shifts the focus away from Tharp and onto a separate historical topic, making the addition irrelevant.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph outlines geologist Marie Tharp's work plotting sonar data to map the ocean floor and her discovery of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.
Establishing the paragraph's core focus is necessary to evaluate the relevance of any proposed additions.
2
Analyze the content of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence introduces details about the military development of sonar during World War I.
This determines how the proposed sentence relates to the main theme of Tharp's oceanographic research.
3
Evaluate the relevance and decide whether to add or reject the sentence.
The sentence should not be added because it introduces tangential historical context that distracts from the narrative about Tharp.
This guides the selection of the correct option containing the right decision and rhetorical justification.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1295Soru

In 1897, the Polish-French physicist Marie Curie began investigating uranium rays for her doctoral thesis. The research project, which she conducted in a drafty shed, soon led to the discovery of radioactivity. The materials that she analyzed during these experiments were highly toxic, but her groundbreaking work changed science forever.

Based on the passage, which option represents the most grammatically correct punctuation for the underlined portion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: project, which she conducted in a drafty shed, soon

Cevap

The correct answer is the option that sets off the nonessential relative clause with commas on both sides and uses the relative pronoun 'which'.
The correct answer correctly uses commas to enclose the nonessential relative clause 'which she conducted in a drafty shed'. Because this clause provides non-critical description rather than identifying info, it requires commas on both sides to set it apart from the main clause of the sentence.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine if the clause 'which she conducted in a drafty shed' is essential or nonessential to the meaning of the main sentence.
The clause is nonessential because the main noun 'project' is already identified, and removing this clause does not change the core meaning of the sentence.
Nonessential information must be set off from the rest of the sentence using punctuation (usually commas).
2
Evaluate the correct punctuation and relative pronoun needed for the nonessential clause.
The clause should begin with the relative pronoun 'which' and be enclosed by a pair of commas: one before the clause and one immediately after it.
Enclosing the clause with commas correctly marks it as parenthetical, allowing the sentence to flow naturally.

Anahtar Kavram

Punctuation of nonessential relative clauses vs. restrictive relative clauses
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1296Soru

After living in the dry desert of Arizona for a decade, Maria found it difficult to get accustomed with the constant humidity of southern Florida.

Which choice is the best replacement for the underlined portion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: accustomed to

Cevap

accustomed to
The correct answer is 'accustomed to' because the word 'accustomed' must be paired with the preposition 'to' to form a standard idiomatic expression meaning 'used to' or 'familiar with'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the underlined phrase and the word that requires a prepositional pairing.
The target word is 'accustomed', which is currently paired with the preposition 'with'.
Idiomatic word choice questions often test whether a specific word is paired with the correct preposition as established by standard English conventions.
2
Determine the correct preposition that pairs with 'accustomed' to mean becoming familiar with or used to something.
The correct preposition is 'to', making the correct phrase 'accustomed to'.
Standard English idiom dictates that we become 'accustomed to' (not 'with', 'of', or 'for') a new environment.

Anahtar Kavram

Idiomatic Preposition Usage
Soru 1297Soru

Passage Excerpt:

In 1938, Marjorie Courtenay-Latimer, a South African museum curator, was inspecting the catch of a local fishing trawler when she noticed an unusual blue fin. Under a heavy pile of sharks, she found a five-foot-long fish with shimmering blue scales and limb-like fins. [Underlined Portion] then contacted J.L.B. Smith, a local chemistry professor and amateur ichthyologist, to help identify it.

Which choice most effectively emphasizes the immediate, hands-on efforts Courtenay-Latimer made to save the specimen from deteriorating before it could be identified?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: She quickly wheeled the fish to the museum in a taxi and treated it with formalin, she

Cevap

The correct option is the one that states: 'She quickly wheeled the fish to the museum in a taxi and treated it with formalin, she'. This choice directly addresses the rhetorical goal of emphasizing immediate hands-on effort to preserve the specimen.
The correct choice successfully details immediate physical actions ('quickly wheeled the fish... in a taxi') and direct efforts to prevent decay ('treated it with formalin') while maintaining perfect grammar in the sentence.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The prompt requires a choice that emphasizes immediate, hands-on efforts to preserve the fish from decaying.
Understanding the precise criteria of the goal is essential to filtering out irrelevant details.
2
Evaluate each option against the rhetorical goal, ensuring it describes active physical preservation efforts.
The option beginning with 'She quickly wheeled' describes direct actions (wheeling the fish, taking a taxi) and preservation methods (formalin), whereas the other choices focus on her worries, her motives, or contain grammatical errors.
This filters the options to find the one that meets both the rhetorical objective and grammatical constraints.
3
Verify that the selected option is grammatically correct and fits seamlessly into the surrounding sentence context.
Inserting the correct choice forms a grammatically correct compound structure ending with 'she then contacted J.L.B. Smith.'
ACT English questions require that the correct rhetorical choice must also be grammatically correct.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1298Soru

Though the city council had initially predicted that the new transit system would be self-sustaining, the project’s ongoing expenses currently at this time continue to exceed revenue, resulting in a deficit that lacks sufficient funds.

Which of the following choices best maintains the sentence's meaning while avoiding redundancy and grammatical errors?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: continue to exceed revenue, resulting in a deficit

Cevap

continue to exceed revenue, resulting in a deficit
The correct option successfully removes the repetitive temporal markers ('currently' and 'at this time') and the redundant definition of 'deficit' ('that lacks sufficient funds'). It maintains 'continue' as the active, finite verb for the subject 'expenses' and properly subordinately links the outcome using the participial modifier 'resulting in a deficit.'

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the redundancies in the original underlined phrase.
The phrase contains two types of redundancy: temporal repetition ('currently', 'at this time', and 'continue' all indicate the present state) and semantic repetition ('a deficit that lacks sufficient funds' repeats the meaning of deficit).
Eliminating redundant words is a primary rule of the ACT English test to ensure conciseness.
2
Evaluate the remaining options for grammatical correctness and sentence structure.
Replacing the verb with 'exceeding' creates a sentence fragment because the main clause no longer has a conjugated verb. Using 'this results' creates a comma splice by joining two independent clauses with only a comma.
An option must not only be concise but also grammatically sound and structurally complete.
3
Select the option that is both concise and grammatically correct.
The phrase 'continue to exceed revenue, resulting in a deficit' is free of redundancy and maintains a complete, grammatically correct independent clause.
This option correctly uses the active verb 'continue' and a subordinating participial phrase 'resulting in' to link the cause and effect clearly.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating redundancy while maintaining grammatical integrity
Soru 1299Soru

Passage Excerpt:

In 1696, Henry Winstanley began constructing the first Eddystone Lighthouse on a notorious reef off the coast of Plymouth, England. The lighthouse was a wooden structure, highly ornate and adorned with carvings and a grand drawing room. [1] Winstanley was so confident in his design that he famously wished to be inside the lighthouse during "the greatest storm that ever was."

Which choice most effectively emphasizes the extreme vulnerability of the lighthouse's design and location to the harsh elements of the sea?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The wooden tower was anchored to a low-lying reef that was entirely submerged at high tide, leaving the structure exposed to the open ocean's brutal waves.

Cevap

The option describing the wooden tower anchored to a low-lying reef submerged at high tide, leaving the structure exposed to the open ocean's brutal waves.
The choice detailing the wooden tower anchored to a low-lying reef submerged at high tide is correct because it directly fulfills the rhetorical goal of highlighting the lighthouse's vulnerability due to its material (wood), location (submerged reef), and environmental forces (brutal waves).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt's rhetorical goal.
The goal is to find the choice that highlights the vulnerability of the lighthouse's design/material (wooden) and location (reef) to the sea's forces.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the choices.
2
Evaluate the choices against the rhetorical goal.
Only the option mentioning the wooden tower and the submerged reef directly addresses both physical vulnerability and environmental elements. The other choices discuss candles, construction duration, or Winstanley's finances.
This identifies the option that fulfills the rhetorical requirements.
3
Check the chosen option for grammatical correctness.
The correct option is grammatically sound, whereas the option mentioning the distance off the coast contains a comma splice.
ACT English questions require the correct choice to be both rhetorically appropriate and grammatically correct.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1300Soru

Read the passage below. Which punctuation mark should be placed in the blank to ensure the sentence is punctuated correctly?

Aşağıdaki boşlukları doldurun

New Caledonian crows are renowned for their sophisticated tool-making abilities. In the wild, these remarkable birds—often compared to primates in terms of cognitive capacity create hooks from twigs to extract insects from deep crevices.
Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

A dash (—)
The correct punctuation mark is a dash. The phrase 'often compared to primates in terms of cognitive capacity' is a parenthetical insert. Because the insert begins with a dash after 'birds', it must be closed with a matching dash before the main verb 'create'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the parenthetical (nonessential) phrase in the sentence.
The phrase 'often compared to primates in terms of cognitive capacity' is parenthetical and nonessential to the grammatical structure of the main clause.
Nonessential information must be set off from the rest of the sentence using consistent punctuation marks.
2
Analyze the punctuation mark that introduces the parenthetical phrase.
An em dash (—) is used right after the word 'birds' to introduce the phrase.
To maintain punctuation consistency, the punctuation mark closing a parenthetical element must match the one that opened it.
3
Select the matching punctuation mark to close the phrase before the main verb.
A matching em dash (—) must be placed in the blank to correctly set off the phrase.
Mixing a dash with a comma or parenthesis to set off the same nonessential element is grammatically incorrect on the ACT.

Anahtar Kavram

Punctuation consistency with dashes setting off nonessential elements
ÖncekiSayfa 65 / 278Sonraki
Tüm alıştırma soruları — ACT | Examkin