For decades, oceanographers have contended that deep-sea mining near hydrothermal vents poses an unacceptable threat to unique benthic ecosystems. Recently, several mining consortia announced plans to deploy new autonomous extraction robots that collect mineral nodules without disrupting the surrounding seabed. However, environmental analysts point out that these robots still emit high-frequency acoustic vibrations that disrupt marine mammal navigation systems across vast distances. Therefore, the claim that autonomous seabed mining eliminates ecological damage is clearly unfounded.
In the argument above, which of the following best describes the roles played by the two boldfaced statements?
- AThe first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a supporting premise introduced to substantiate that conclusion.
- BThe first provides background evidence supporting the author's overall position; the second is an intermediate conclusion used to support a further unstated claim.
- The first describes a proposed technological solution cited by proponents to address an ecological concern; the second is the main conclusion of the argument, which contends that this solution fails to eliminate the concern.Cevap
- DThe first is a position advocated by oceanographers; the second is a counterargument intended to refute the oceanographers' position.
- EThe first is an observation that the argument relies upon to establish its main conclusion; the second is a judgment offered as evidence for a rival position.
Cevap
The option stating that the first bolded statement describes a proposed technological solution cited by proponents to address an ecological concern, while the second is the main conclusion asserting that this solution fails to eliminate the concern, is the correct answer.
The correct answer accurately identifies that the first bolded sentence presents a technological development (autonomous robots) proposed by mining consortia to address seabed disruption. The second bolded sentence, signaled by the conclusion word 'Therefore', delivers the argument's main conclusion: that the assertion that this technology eliminates ecological damage is unfounded due to acoustic disruption.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Analyzing Structural Roles of Bolded Statements in Critical Reasoning Arguments