Soru

Zorluk: KolayAnalyzing Bolded Statement Roles

Recent legislation in a certain state mandates that all commercial buildings install automated energy-management systems. Local business owners claim that the upfront installation costs will force small retail stores into bankruptcy. However, state environmental regulators point out that the energy savings generated within the first six months typically exceed the initial setup costs.

In the argument above, the two bolded statements play which of the following roles?

  1. The first is a position that the argument seeks to refute; the second is evidence provided to counter that position.Cevap
  2. B
    The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a premise offered in support of that conclusion.
  3. C
    The first is background information providing context; the second is an intermediate conclusion drawn by local business owners.
  4. D
    The first is evidence supporting the main conclusion; the second is an opposing claim rejected by the argument.
  5. E
    The first is a subsidiary conclusion reached by environmental regulators; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.

Cevap

The first bolded statement is a position that the argument seeks to refute, and the second is evidence provided to counter that position.
The correct response accurately identifies that the first bolded clause represents an objection to the new energy legislation, while the second bolded clause provides factual data cited to show why that objection is unfounded.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural role of the first bolded statement.
The statement presents the objection of business owners arguing that energy-management systems cause bankruptcy.
It establishes the counter-position that the rest of the passage attempts to undermine.
2
Analyze the pivot and the second bolded statement.
The transition 'However' signals a rebuttal, followed by the fact that six-month energy savings exceed setup costs.
This fact serves as supporting evidence used by regulators to defeat the business owners' objection.
3
Match both roles to the correct option choice.
The statement describing the first as an opposing position to refute and the second as countering evidence is correct.
It accurately captures both the opponent's stance and the author/regulator's counter-evidence.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Bolded Statement Roles in Rebuttal Arguments
Bu soruyu puanla