Critical Reasoning: Argument Evaluation

176 soru

Soru 21Soru

Municipal planners in City K recently installed permeable asphalt along downtown sidewalks to reduce surface runoff during storm events. During the first rainy season following installation, measured runoff volume entering the local river decreased by 30 percent compared to the historical seasonal average. The planners concluded that expanding the installation of permeable asphalt throughout all municipal districts will significantly mitigate urban flooding during future severe storms.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the municipal planners' conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The total volume and intensity of rainfall during the first rainy season were typical of severe storm conditions, and no other runoff control measures were introduced in the downtown area during that period.

Cevap

The argument is most strongly supported by the statement showing that the total volume and intensity of rainfall during the trial period were typical of severe storm conditions and that no alternative runoff control measures were active.
The correct answer strengthens the argument by demonstrating that the test period was representative of severe storm conditions and by ruling out alternative explanations (such as other flood control projects or light rainfall) for the observed reduction in runoff.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument into premise and conclusion.
Premise: Permeable asphalt installed downtown coincided with a 30% drop in river runoff during one rainy season. Conclusion: Expanding permeable asphalt citywide will significantly mitigate future urban flooding.
Identifying the gap between a single limited trial and a broader causal claim is essential for evaluating strengthening statements.
2
Identify potential vulnerabilities in the author's reasoning.
The 30% drop could have been caused by lighter-than-usual rain or other unmentioned flood control interventions, or the trial conditions might not represent true severe storm conditions.
Strengthening questions often require ruling out alternative causes or confirming that trial conditions mirror the target conditions.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the statement that addresses these vulnerabilities.
Confirming that rainfall intensity matched severe storm conditions and that no other interventions occurred eliminates confounding variables and supports the claim that permeable asphalt caused the reduction.
Ruling out confounding variables directly increases confidence in the causal relationship asserted by the conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Arguments by Ruling Out Confounding Variables
Soru 22Soru

To protect centuries-old parchment manuscripts from humidity-induced decay, the curators of a national archive recently replaced the facility's traditional refrigeration-based cooling coils with advanced chemical desiccant air-drying units. Over the six months following the replacement, sensor logs confirmed that relative humidity in the vault remained perfectly stabilized within the ideal target range of 45% to 50%. Nevertheless, physical inspections conducted at the end of the period revealed that the rate of structural fiber cracking on the parchment manuscripts was twice as high as it had been during the six months prior to the equipment change. Concluding that the new desiccant units were directly responsible for the accelerated deterioration, the lead conservator recommended re-installing the original refrigeration-based system.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the lead conservator's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: During the six months following the equipment change, manuscripts stored in an adjacent vault served by the original refrigeration-based system experienced no increase in fiber cracking, despite being handled with the same frequency as those in the updated vault.

Cevap

The argument is most strengthened by the evidence that manuscripts stored under the original refrigeration system in an adjacent vault suffered no increase in damage under identical handling conditions.
The correct response introduces a control group: identical manuscripts in an adjacent room kept under the old refrigeration system experienced no increase in cracking while being handled at the same rate. By keeping external conditions and handling constant between the two groups, this finding effectively rules out alternative explanations (such as seasonal shifts or handling damage) and provides strong empirical evidence that the new desiccant system caused the accelerated deterioration.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the author's premise and conclusion
Premise: Fiber cracking doubled after replacing refrigeration coils with chemical desiccant units, even though relative humidity remained constant. Conclusion: The chemical desiccant units caused the damage, so the original refrigeration system should be restored.
Understanding the precise causal link claimed by the author is essential to identifying strengthening evidence.
2
Evaluate potential logical gaps or alternative explanations
The increase in cracking could have been caused by unmeasured external variables (e.g., seasonal weather shifts, increased archival handling, ambient temperature fluctuation) rather than the desiccant units themselves.
Strengthening a causal argument requires ruling out plausible alternative causes or providing a control group.
3
Select the option that confirms causality by controlling for confounding variables
Showing that manuscripts in a control vault equipped with the old system suffered no increase in damage under identical conditions rules out general environmental or handling causes and isolates the desiccant system as the driver of the damage.
A controlled comparative setup eliminates alternative explanations, directly validating the lead conservator's causal claim.

Anahtar Kavram

Causal Argument Strengthening via Control Group / Elimination of Alternative Causes
Soru 23Soru

Prior to 2022, any corporate entity acquiring more than a 15 percent stake in a domestic renewable energy producer in Nation X was subject to mandatory federal antitrust review unless the acquiring entity was a state-backed entity. In 2022, Nation X amended its regulations such that all corporate acquisitions of domestic energy producers, regardless of the acquiring entity's state-backed status or stake size, require mandatory federal antitrust review if the target firm holds exclusive regional distribution rights. Last year, Solis Corp, a private non-state-backed corporation, acquired a 12 percent stake in Terra Energy, a domestic renewable energy producer in Nation X, without undergoing a federal antitrust review.

Which of the following statements must be true based on the information provided above? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: If Terra Energy holds exclusive regional distribution rights in Nation X, Solis Corp's acquisition must have occurred prior to the 2022 regulatory amendment.; Prior to 2022, state-backed entities acquiring more than a 15 percent stake in a domestic renewable energy producer in Nation X were exempt from mandatory federal antitrust review.

Cevap

The correct statements are: 1) 'If Terra Energy holds exclusive regional distribution rights in Nation X, Solis Corp's acquisition must have occurred prior to the 2022 regulatory amendment' and 2) 'Prior to 2022, state-backed entities acquiring more than a 15 percent stake in a domestic renewable energy producer in Nation X were exempt from mandatory federal antitrust review.'
The conclusion regarding state-backed entities being exempt prior to 2022 follows directly from the exception clause ('unless the acquiring entity was a state-backed entity'). The conditional conclusion regarding exclusive regional distribution rights follows by contrapositive reasoning: post-2022 rules mandate reviews for any acquisition of a firm with exclusive distribution rights regardless of stake size; since Solis Corp's acquisition of a 12 percent stake was unreviewed, if Terra Energy possesses exclusive distribution rights, the transaction could not have occurred under the post-2022 rules and must have taken place prior to the amendment.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the pre-2022 regulatory framework premises.
Before 2022, mandatory antitrust review applied ONLY IF (stake > 15%) AND (acquiring entity is NOT state-backed). State-backed entities were explicitly exempt.
Establishes the boundary conditions for acquisitions occurring prior to 2022.
2
Analyze the post-2022 regulatory framework premises.
After the 2022 amendment, mandatory review applies to ALL corporate acquisitions IF target holds exclusive regional distribution rights (regardless of state-backed status or stake percentage).
Establishes the strict conditional trigger for post-2022 transactions.
3
Apply formal logic (contrapositive) to the unreviewed acquisition of Terra Energy by Solis Corp.
Solis Corp (private) acquired 12% of Terra Energy (domestic renewable producer) with NO review. If Terra Energy has exclusive distribution rights, the transaction CANNOT be post-2022 (since post-2022 requires review for any stake if exclusive rights exist). Thus, if exclusive rights exist, the transaction MUST be pre-2022.
Synthesizes the specific factual scenario with the conditional rules to deduce valid conclusions.

Anahtar Kavram

Drawing Valid Conditional Inferences and Contrapositive Deduction
Soru 24Soru

A renewable energy company recently installed ultrasonic anti-scaling transducers along the fluid conduits of its geothermal power plant. Management hypothesized that high-frequency sound waves from these devices would prevent mineral deposits from adhering to the interior of heat exchanger pipes, thereby eliminating the need for periodic chemical cleaning shutdowns. Over the subsequent six-month evaluation period, the plant operated continuously without requiring a single descaling shutdown, and net electricity output remained constant. Management concluded that the ultrasonic transducers were directly responsible for preventing mineral scale accumulation during this period.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens management's conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: An adjacent geothermal well drawing from the identical fluid reservoir, operating without ultrasonic transducers, experienced severe mineral scaling that required three cleaning shutdowns during the same six-month period.

Cevap

The argument is most strengthened by the finding that an adjacent, identical well lacking transducers suffered severe scaling under the same conditions.
The conclusion asserts a direct cause-and-effect relationship between the installation of ultrasonic transducers and the absence of mineral scale buildup. The option referencing the adjacent well drawing from the same fluid reservoir acts as a controlled experiment. By demonstrating that scaling still occurred in the absence of transducers under identical fluid conditions, it rules out the alternative explanation that fluid composition naturally prevented scaling, thereby strongly supporting the conclusion that the transducers caused the observed result.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and underlying causal logic.
Conclusion: Ultrasonic transducers prevented mineral scale accumulation. Causal premise: Transducers were installed, and no scaling shutdowns occurred for six months.
To strengthen a causal conclusion, one must demonstrate that the cause produced the effect and rule out alternative causes (e.g., natural drop in mineral levels).
2
Evaluate the impact of establishing a comparative control group.
Showing that an identical well without transducers experienced scaling confirms that scaling conditions were present, establishing that the transducers were the critical difference-maker.
A control group isolates the causal variable and confirms that the outcome was not due to ambient environmental changes.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Causal Arguments via Controlled Comparison
Soru 25Soru

To reduce traffic congestion during peak hours, a city council plans to eliminate free on-street parking in the financial district and implement hourly parking fees. Council members claim this policy will encourage commuters to switch to public transit, thereby decreasing the total number of cars entering the area each morning. Which of the following would be most useful to evaluate in order to determine whether the city council's plan will succeed?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Whether public transit lines serving the financial district currently have sufficient unused capacity during peak morning hours to accommodate additional passengers.

Cevap

Whether public transit lines serving the financial district currently have sufficient unused capacity during peak morning hours to accommodate additional passengers.
The plan relies on a crucial assumption: that commuters discouraged by parking fees actually have the practical option to switch to public transit. Evaluating transit capacity tests this assumption directly. If transit is already at peak capacity, commuters cannot switch, negating the plan's intended mechanism.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the plan and its explicit goal.
Plan: Eliminate free parking and charge hourly fees. Goal: Reduce traffic congestion by prompting commuters to switch to public transit.
Evaluating a plan requires focusing strictly on the link between the proposed mechanism and the intended goal.
2
Apply the Variance Test to evaluate the key assumption.
If transit has capacity: Drivers can switch, reducing congestion (plan succeeds). If transit lacks capacity: Drivers cannot switch, remaining in traffic or finding alternatives without reducing vehicle count effectively (plan fails).
Answering this question yields opposite outcomes for the success of the plan, proving its critical relevance.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Plan Viability (Variance Test)
Soru 26Soru

Archaeologists analyzing high-resolution synthetic aperture radar imagery of the Eastern Desert observed subsurface linear anomalies near ancient copper mines. Carbon dating of organic residue in nearby soil strata dates to the 12th century BCE. The researchers concluded that these linear anomalies represent buried irrigation canals constructed specifically to support the agricultural needs of the mining settlements.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the researchers' conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Soil samples extracted directly from inside the linear structures contain preserved pollen from cultivated grain crops that cannot survive in desert environments without artificial watering.

Cevap

The discovery of fossilized pollen from cultivated grain crops requiring artificial watering inside the linear structures provides direct empirical evidence that the anomalies were indeed irrigation canals built to support local agriculture.
The correct answer provides direct physical evidence connecting the subsurface linear structures to agricultural irrigation. Finding preserved pollen from crops that require artificial watering inside the features demonstrates that they functioned as water channels designed for crop cultivation, directly reinforcing the researchers' conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument into premise and conclusion
Premise: Radar imagery shows subsurface linear anomalies near 12th-century BCE copper mines, with nearby organic soil strata dating to that period. Conclusion: The anomalies are buried irrigation canals built to supply agricultural needs for the mining settlements.
Strengthening questions require identifying the logical gap between the evidence (linear shapes near mines) and the conclusion (irrigation canals for farming).
2
Identify the key assumption underlying the conclusion
The argument assumes that the linear anomalies are artificial structures intended for carrying water to crops rather than natural geological formations or non-agricultural conduits.
Providing evidence that directly links the interior of the structures to crop cultivation requiring diverted water validates this core assumption.
3
Evaluate the answer options against the strengthening objective
The option establishing the presence of crop pollen requiring artificial watering inside the structures explicitly confirms their agricultural and hydrological function.
Direct evidence of agricultural water usage inside the features supplies the missing evidentiary link.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Arguments by Providing Direct Evidence for Unstated Assumptions
Soru 27Soru

A technology company recently introduced an asynchronous communication policy, replacing mandatory daily team meetings with written status updates. Over the subsequent twelve months, the average time required for the software development team to complete project features decreased by 35 percent. The director of operations concluded that eliminating daily meetings directly caused the reduction in feature completion time by minimizing workplace disruptions. Which of the following would be most useful to determine in evaluating the director of operations' conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Whether the company implemented automated code-testing software during the same twelve-month period that significantly reduced deployment delays.

Cevap

Determining whether the company implemented automated code-testing software during the same twelve-month period that significantly reduced deployment delays is most useful in evaluating the conclusion.
The correct answer provides a critical test for an alternative explanation (confounding variable). In GMAT causal evaluation, an argument inferring causation from a temporal correlation can be evaluated by checking whether another major operational change occurred simultaneously. If automated testing software was introduced, that software could be the real reason completion times dropped, thereby weakening the director's claim. If no such software was introduced, that potential alternative cause is eliminated, strengthening the director's claim.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument structure.
Premise: Meeting elimination was followed by a 35% decrease in feature completion time. Conclusion: Eliminating meetings directly caused the reduction in completion time by eliminating disruptions.
Identifying the premise and conclusion clarifies that the argument relies on a correlation-to-causation leap.
2
Identify the primary logical vulnerability in causal reasoning.
The argument assumes no external confounding factors or alternative explanations caused the productivity increase during the twelve-month period.
Causal claims based on chronological sequence (post hoc reasoning) are highly vulnerable to third-variable confounders.
3
Evaluate the answer choices against the Variance Test for causal evaluation.
If automated testing software was introduced (Yes), it offers an alternative cause for the faster completion times, weakening the conclusion. If no automated testing was introduced (No), an alternative cause is ruled out, strengthening the conclusion.
An option that yields opposite logical effects depending on a 'Yes' or 'No' answer is the correct evaluation factor.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Causal Arguments by Rule-Out or Identification of Alternative Explanations
Soru 28Soru

A regional agricultural board planned to reduce crop losses caused by the invasive stem borer beetle by introducing a parasitic wasp species known to prey exclusively on stem borer larvae. In field trial plots located in low-altitude valleys, the wasp was released, and stem borer larva populations dropped by 70%70\% within one season, leading to a substantial decrease in crop damage. Based on these results, the board concluded that releasing the wasp regionally will reliably protect crops from stem borer damage across all commercial farming zones in the region. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the agricultural board's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The parasitic wasp cannot survive winter temperatures characteristic of the region's primary commercial farming zones, which are located at much higher altitudes than the trial plots.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by the fact that the parasitic wasp cannot survive the winter temperatures in the region's primary commercial farming zones.
The correct answer weakens the argument by exposing a flaw in generalizability. The agricultural board assumes that success in low-altitude trial plots guarantees success across all commercial farming zones. If the main commercial farming zones experience winter temperatures too cold for the wasp to survive due to higher altitude, the wasp population will fail to establish itself and cannot provide reliable crop protection.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument's premises and main conclusion.
Premise: Releasing wasps in low-altitude trial plots reduced stem borer larvae by 70% and significantly decreased crop damage. Conclusion: Regional release of the wasp will reliably protect crops across all commercial farming zones in the region.
Understanding the precise leap from trial plot results to region-wide application is essential to identifying logical vulnerabilities.
2
Identify the unstated assumption linking premise to conclusion.
The argument assumes that environmental and operational conditions in the trial plots are representative of all commercial farming zones in the region.
For trial results to predict regional outcomes, key conditions affecting wasp survival must be consistent across zones.
3
Evaluate answer choices for information that shatters this assumption.
Evidence that the wasp cannot survive winter temperatures in the main commercial farming zones (due to altitude differences) proves the trial results cannot be replicated regionally.
If the wasp dies off during winter in primary farming areas, it cannot provide sustained or reliable crop protection.

Anahtar Kavram

Generalizability of Trial Results and Environmental Constraints in Biological Plans
Soru 29Soru

Three months ago, a citrus orchard manager introduced a species of non-stinging predatory mite to combat Asian citrus psyllids, insects that transmit a destructive bacterial disease to orange trees. Over the subsequent three-month period, the population of Asian citrus psyllids in the orchard decreased by 60 percent. Based on this outcome, the manager concluded that the introduction of the predatory mites was responsible for the decline in the psyllid population.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the manager's conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: In nearby citrus orchards with identical environmental conditions where predatory mites were not introduced, the Asian citrus psyllid population did not decrease over the same three-month period.

Cevap

The argument is most strongly supported by the statement indicating that in nearby orchards under identical conditions where predatory mites were not introduced, the psyllid population did not decrease.
The conclusion asserts a causal relationship between introducing predatory mites and the 60 percent decline in psyllids. The correct choice provides a control comparison: in neighboring orchards where environmental conditions were identical but mites were absent, psyllid populations remained stable. This rules out seasonal changes, weather events, or natural population cycles as the cause of the decline, significantly strengthening the manager's claim that the mites were responsible.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premises and conclusion.
Premise: Mites were introduced, and psyllid numbers dropped by 60% over 3 months. Conclusion: Introducing the mites caused the drop in psyllids.
Understanding the precise cause-and-effect claim is necessary before evaluating strengthening evidence.
2
Analyze what evidence would strengthen a causal claim.
A causal argument is strengthened by ruling out alternative explanations (such as weather or pesticides) or showing a control scenario where the cause is absent and the effect does not occur.
Standard GMAT strengthening mechanisms for causal arguments rely on establishing correlation/control or eliminating competing causes.
3
Evaluate the option presenting a control group.
Showing that nearby orchards without mites experienced no decrease in psyllids under identical weather conditions confirms that the decline was specific to the orchard with mites.
This effectively rules out external weather/seasonal factors as the true cause of the population decline.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Causal Arguments via Control Groups and Alternative Cause Elimination
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 30Soru

To reduce agricultural nitrate pollution in local river systems, a regional water district plans to install floating artificial wetlands across its primary collection reservoirs. Critics argue that because the wetland plants enter dormancy during the winter—the season when agricultural runoff peaks—the system will fail to reduce nitrate levels when treatment is most needed. Nevertheless, environmental engineers maintain that installing these floating wetlands will substantially reduce the total annual amount of nitrates reaching the rivers. Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the environmental engineers' prediction?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Even when the plants are dormant, dense root matrices beneath the floating mats host cold-tolerant bacterial colonies that decompose nitrates throughout the winter.

Cevap

Even when the plants are dormant, dense root matrices beneath the floating mats host cold-tolerant bacterial colonies that decompose nitrates throughout the winter.
The engineers predict a net annual reduction in nitrate runoff despite critics' objection that plants go dormant in winter during peak runoff. The option stating that cold-tolerant bacterial colonies within root matrices decompose nitrates through the winter directly resolves this concern. By providing a continuous mechanism for nitrate removal when plant uptake is dormant, this choice strongly reinforces the engineers' prediction.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's structure and core conflict.
Premise: Critics point out that wetland plants are dormant in winter when agricultural runoff peaks. Conclusion: Engineers predict that floating wetlands will still significantly lower annual nitrate runoff to rivers.
Strengthening requires finding evidence that fills the logical gap or addresses the vulnerability raised by critics.
2
Determine the necessary strengthening mechanism.
The argument needs evidence showing that nitrate levels will still be reduced in winter despite plant dormancy, or that winter plant dormancy does not impede overall annual removal.
Overcoming the objection about winter inefficiency directly supports the engineers' annual reduction claim.
3
Evaluate the answer choices against the required mechanism.
The fact that cold-tolerant bacteria in the root matrix break down nitrates continuously during winter supplies a missing mechanism that explains how the system works despite plant dormancy.
Supplying an active process for nitrate breakdown during plant dormancy resolves the main vulnerability in the engineers' prediction.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Arguments by Supplying a Missing Mechanism or Countering an Objection
Soru 31Soru

A local coffee shop owner plans to increase total monthly profits by raising the price of all specialty espresso drinks by 10 percent. The owner reasons that because demand for specialty drinks has remained steady over the past year, customers will continue to buy the exact same quantity of drinks despite the price increase.

Which of the following would be most useful to evaluate the validity of the coffee shop owner's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Whether the price increase will cause a significant number of customers to switch to cheaper alternatives or stop buying drinks.

Cevap

Determining whether the price increase will cause a significant number of customers to switch to cheaper alternatives or stop buying drinks is most useful for evaluating the argument.
The correct answer provides information that directly addresses the core assumption of the argument. Applying the Test of Variance: if the price increase causes customers to switch to cheaper drinks or leave, sales volume will decline and ruin profitability; if it does not cause customer loss, revenue and profits will rise as intended. Because the two extreme answers produce opposite impacts on the conclusion, this information is critical for evaluating argument validity.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's core structure and conclusion.
Conclusion: Raising specialty espresso prices by 10 percent will increase total monthly profits. Premise: Past demand was steady, so quantity sold will remain unchanged.
Understanding the logic gap between price increase and total revenue requires testing the unstated assumption that volume will not decline.
2
Apply the Test of Variance to evaluate the impact of opposite responses.
If YES (customers switch or stop buying), total volume drops, which shatters the argument. If NO (customers buy the same quantity), total revenue increases, validating the argument.
A question that produces opposite impacts on the argument's conclusion under extreme answers is the definitive evaluation metric.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Argument Validity and Test of Variance
Soru 32Soru

Hospitals in competitive metropolitan areas frequently suffer substantial revenue loss when surgical procedures are delayed due to sterilizer equipment failure. To eliminate these losses, a regional hospital network plans to replace all of its steam-autoclave sterilizers with modern hydrogen peroxide gas plasma units. Because gas plasma units complete a sterilization cycle in one-third the time required by steam autoclaves, hospital administrators conclude that adopting gas plasma units will virtually eliminate surgical delays caused by equipment unavailability.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the hospital administrators' conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Gas plasma units require specialized synthetic containment trays that degrade rapidly under routine use, necessitating mandatory cooling and safety inspection periods that offline the units for longer total duration each week than steam autoclaves.

Cevap

The argument is most weakened by the finding that gas plasma units require frequent inspection and cooling downtime for synthetic trays, resulting in greater overall weekly equipment unavailability than steam autoclaves.
The correct answer identifies an operational constraint—frequent inspection and cooling periods for specialized containment trays—that causes gas plasma units to be offline for longer cumulative periods overall than the older steam autoclaves. Even though each sterilization cycle is individually faster, the increased maintenance downtime reduces total equipment availability, directly contradicting the administrators' conclusion that surgical delays due to unavailable equipment will be eliminated.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the core argument
Premise: Gas plasma sterilizers complete individual cycles in one-third the time of steam autoclaves. Conclusion: Replacing steam autoclaves with gas plasma units will eliminate surgical delays caused by equipment unavailability.
Identifying the link between the premise (faster cycle time) and conclusion (reduced overall equipment downtime) exposes the unstated assumption that faster cycle times equal greater total equipment availability.
2
Identify the unstated logical gap
The argument assumes no secondary factors (such as maintenance, inspection, or failure rates) will offset the time saved during individual sterilization cycles.
To weaken a plan-to-goal argument, an option must demonstrate an unintended side effect or constraint that prevents the goal from being achieved.
3
Evaluate the choices against the central gap
The option revealing that maintenance safety inspections offline the gas plasma units for longer total durations per week directly breaks the assumption and proves equipment unavailability will persist or worsen.
This fact directly undermines the conclusion that surgical delays caused by equipment unavailability will be eliminated.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening Causal and Plan-to-Goal Arguments via Unintended Operational Bottlenecks
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 33Soru

A major commercial airline plans to retrofit its long-haul passenger fleet with lightweight carbon-fiber seating frames to reduce overall aircraft weight and lower fuel expenditures over the next five years. Management reasons that because jet fuel represents over thirty percent of total operating expenses, achieving a ten percent reduction in cabin weight will generate substantial net financial savings, even after accounting for the initial capital costs of purchasing and installing the new seats.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning behind the airline management's plan?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The carbon-fiber seating frames require specialized bi-annual structural inspections and maintenance that cost significantly more than the monetary value of the projected fuel savings.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by demonstrating that specialized bi-annual structural inspections and maintenance for the carbon-fiber seats will cost significantly more than the projected fuel savings.
The airline's conclusion rests on the financial calculation that reducing fuel consumption will produce net savings after paying for the initial installation of the seats. Showing that recurring maintenance and inspection costs for these specific seats exceed the monetary value of the fuel saved directly contradicts the assumption of net savings, invalidating management's reasoning.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the core argument
Premise: Carbon-fiber seats reduce cabin weight by 10%, lowering fuel usage. Fuel is >30% of operating costs.
Conclusion: The retrofit plan will generate substantial net financial savings over 5 years despite initial installation costs.
Identifying the explicit premises and conclusion reveals the logic gap.
2
Identify the key unstated assumption
The author assumes that there are no additional hidden or ongoing costs associated with carbon-fiber seats that will exceed the projected fuel savings over the 5-year timeframe.
Weakening questions targeting cost-benefit plans frequently rely on unstated operational or maintenance costs.
3
Evaluate the options for logical impact
The statement regarding bi-annual maintenance costs explicitly shows that recurring expenses will exceed the monetary value of fuel saved, rendering net savings impossible.
Directly breaking the financial feasibility premise shatters the conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Feasibility and Net Impact in Plan-Based Arguments
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 34Soru

In 2024, a major city launched a public transit initiative that made bus travel entirely free for all residents. Transportation officials expected this program to significantly reduce traffic congestion on city roads by encouraging drivers to leave their personal vehicles at home. However, six months after the policy took effect, traffic congestion on major roadways remained virtually unchanged, despite municipal transit data showing a fifty percent increase in total bus ridership.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the apparent discrepancy described above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The majority of the new bus passengers were individuals who previously walked or rode bicycles to their destinations rather than driving personal vehicles.

Cevap

The apparent paradox is best explained by the fact that the new bus riders were drawn from pedestrians and cyclists rather than former automobile drivers.
The correct answer provides a missing premise that allows both observed facts to be true simultaneously. If the new bus riders previously walked or biked, their shift to bus transit directly accounts for the 50% increase in bus passenger volume while simultaneously explaining why the number of personal vehicles on the road—and thus traffic congestion—did not decline.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the two conflicting facts presented in the stimulus.
Fact 1: Bus ridership increased by 50% after buses became free. Fact 2: Traffic congestion on major roadways remained virtually unchanged.
Resolving a discrepancy requires identifying the two statements that seem contradictory on the surface.
2
Determine the missing assumption linking the two facts.
The officials assumed that new bus riders would come from existing car drivers.
If new bus riders did not come from car drivers, then car traffic would not decrease despite the surge in bus passengers.
3
Evaluate the options for a factor that reconciles both facts without contradicting either.
The option stating that new passengers previously walked or cycled accounts for both the 50% increase in bus ridership and the lack of change in car traffic congestion.
Shifting pedestrians and cyclists to buses increases bus ridership while leaving the number of cars on the road identical.

Anahtar Kavram

Resolving Apparent Paradoxes by Identifying Alternative Data Pools
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 35Soru

Consider the following argument: A regional hospital system plans to replace all traditional brass door handles across its facilities with handles coated in a novel antimicrobial polymer coating in order to reduce patient infection rates. Hospital administrators reason that because laboratory tests demonstrate the polymer kills 99 percent of surface bacteria within fifteen minutes of contact, installing these coated handles will significantly decrease the incidence of hospital-acquired infections.

True or False: Determining whether the routine chemical cleaning solutions used by hospital sanitation staff rapidly degrade the antimicrobial efficacy of the polymer coating upon contact constitutes a valid application of the Test of Variance for evaluating the validity of the administrators' argument.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

The statement is True. Assessing whether hospital cleaning chemicals degrade the antimicrobial polymer coating is a valid test of variance because two opposite extreme answers yield opposite logical impacts on the conclusion.
The statement is correct because the proposed evaluation directly targets a necessary condition for the real-world success of the hospital's plan. Applying the Test of Variance shows that if hospital disinfectants destroy the polymer coating, the conclusion is invalid, whereas if the disinfectants leave the coating undamaged, the premise holds in practice.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core argument structure
Premise: Laboratory tests show a polymer coating kills 99% of bacteria within 15 minutes. Conclusion: Installing polymer-coated door handles in hospitals will significantly decrease patient infection rates.
Understanding the premise-to-conclusion gap is required to evaluate what unstated assumptions link laboratory results to real-world outcomes.
2
Apply the two opposite extreme outcomes of the Test of Variance to the candidate evaluation question
Extreme Outcome 1: Cleaning chemicals DO rapidly degrade the polymer coating. Extreme Outcome 2: Cleaning chemicals DO NOT degrade the polymer coating.
The Test of Variance tests argument validity by checking if opposite polar responses exert opposite logical forces on the conclusion.
3
Analyze the logical impact of each extreme outcome on the conclusion
If degradation occurs rapidly, the handles lose their antibacterial properties under actual hospital protocols, causing the plan to fail (weakens the argument). If degradation does not occur, the polymer remains effective as demonstrated in labs (supports the argument).
Because one extreme outcome invalidates the plan while the opposite extreme outcome preserves its likelihood of success, the evaluated factor is crucial for assessing argument validity.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Argument Validity via the Test of Variance
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 36Soru

To reduce annual operational expenditures, the municipal water authority of Oakhaven plans to install acoustic sensor networks along its underground pipeline grid. The authority reasons that because these sensors detect acoustic frequencies generated by micro-leaks long before water breaches the surface, maintenance crews can repair small pipe fractures early, thereby significantly lowering total water loss costs and expensive emergency excavation expenses.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the municipal water authority's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Subterranean vibrations from heavy vehicle traffic and municipal transit lines in Oakhaven frequently trigger false leak alerts in the acoustic sensors, resulting in exploratory excavations that cost more than traditional emergency repairs.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by the finding that subterranean traffic vibrations cause frequent false leak alerts in acoustic sensors, prompting exploratory excavations that cost more than traditional emergency repairs.
The conclusion asserts that installing acoustic sensors will lower water loss and emergency excavation expenses. The correct answer points out that background traffic vibrations trigger false positive alerts, leading to unnecessary exploratory digs that cost more than current emergency repairs. This directly invalidates the premise that early detection leads to overall net savings on excavations.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and main premise of the argument.
Conclusion: Installing acoustic sensor networks will significantly lower total water loss costs and emergency excavation expenses. Premise: Sensors detect micro-leaks early, allowing early repairs.
Understanding the logical gap requires isolating what the author assumes will happen when sensors are deployed.
2
Identify the underlying unstated assumption.
The author assumes that sensor alerts will accurately indicate actionable leaks without introducing new, unforeseen operational expenses that outweigh the savings.
A weakening statement must target this link by showing why early detection via sensors will not actually result in net cost savings.
3
Evaluate the answer choices for a factor that undermines the net cost reduction.
The statement regarding false leak alerts triggered by traffic vibrations demonstrates that the sensors will generate unnecessary exploratory digs, incurring costs that exceed baseline repair expenses.
This directly counteracts the claim that total excavation and maintenance costs will decrease.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening Causal and Plan-to-Goal Arguments
Soru 37Soru

A municipal council recently planted thousands of fast-growing shade trees along residential streets with the goal of lowering household summer electricity bills. Council members reasoned that by shielding home roofs and exterior walls from direct sunlight during peak afternoon hours, the trees would significantly reduce the need for indoor air conditioning.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the council members' reasoning?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Air conditioning units in the municipality consume significantly more energy when the surrounding air and building walls are heated by direct afternoon sunlight.

Cevap

The argument is most strongly supported by the statement establishing that air conditioning units consume significantly more energy when building walls are heated by direct afternoon sunlight.
The correct response directly strengthens the argument by providing evidence for the underlying physical mechanism. If air conditioners draw significantly more electricity when building walls absorb direct sunlight, then shading those walls directly reduces the thermal load on the cooling units, validating the council's claim that household electricity bills will drop.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument.
Premise: Planting street trees shields home roofs and walls from direct sunlight. Conclusion: Shielding homes from sunlight will reduce indoor air conditioning reliance and lower summer electricity bills.
Recognizing the connection between the premise (shading building surfaces) and the conclusion (lowering electricity bills) reveals the unstated assumption.
2
Identify the core assumption bridging premise and conclusion.
The argument assumes that direct sunlight hitting building walls significantly increases the energy required by air conditioning systems to cool the home interior.
A valid strengthening statement must confirm this operational relationship.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the statement that confirms this core assumption.
The statement showing that air conditioners consume significantly more energy when surrounding walls are heated by direct sunlight directly validates the proposed mechanism of energy savings.
Confirming the direct causal link strengthens the council's conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening a argument by confirming an underlying causal link or operational mechanism.
Soru 38Soru

Art historians recently analyzed a 14th-century illuminated codex of previously unknown origin and hypothesized that it was illuminated at Monastery X rather than at neighboring Monastery Y. In support of this hypothesis, the historians noted that chemical analysis of the blue pigment in the codex's illustrations revealed a specific trace ratio of mineral impurities identical to that of lapis lazuli imports recorded exclusively in Monastery X's financial ledgers from that era. Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the historians' hypothesis?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Financial ledgers from Monastery X indicate that all imported lapis lazuli pigments were strictly reserved for internal manuscript production and were never traded or gifted to outside scriptoria.

Cevap

The statement that Monastery X strictly reserved all imported lapis lazuli pigments for internal manuscript production and never traded or gifted them to outside scriptoria provides the strongest support for the conclusion.
The argument concludes that Monastery X illuminated the codex based on the match between the pigment in the codex and Monastery X's imported lapis lazuli. For this evidence to strongly point to Monastery X as the creator, Monastery Y must not have had access to Monastery X's lapis lazuli. The option stating that Monastery X strictly reserved its lapis lazuli for internal use and never traded or gifted it directly eliminates the possibility that Monastery Y acquired and used the pigment, thereby validating the author's attribution.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premise and conclusion of the argument.
Premise: The codex contains blue pigment matching lapis lazuli imports documented exclusively in Monastery X's ledgers. Conclusion: The codex was illuminated at Monastery X rather than Monastery Y.
Deconstructing the argument reveals the logical gap between possessing matching pigment data and proving exclusive origin.
2
Identify the unstated assumption or potential vulnerability in the author's logic.
The argument assumes that Monastery Y could not have used Monastery X's lapis lazuli pigment to illuminate the codex.
If Monastery X shared or sold its pigment to Monastery Y, the presence of that pigment in the codex would no longer prove Monastery X was the sole creator.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to find the statement that closes this logical gap.
Confirming that Monastery X never shared or traded its lapis lazuli pigments rules out the possibility that Monastery Y used the pigment, thereby strongly supporting Monastery X as the origin.
Eliminating alternative explanations is a classic mechanism for strengthening causal and attribution arguments on the GMAT.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening by ruling out alternative explanations / confirming key assumptions
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 39Soru

During a three-year conservation project in Park Z, field researchers tracked native animal populations. The researchers found that whenever the population of wild rabbits decreased below 1,000 individuals, the population of red foxes consistently declined in the following year. Conversely, in years when the rabbit population was at or above 1,000, the red fox population never declined in the following year. Throughout both the second and third years of the project, the red fox population in Park Z experienced a decline. If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The population of wild rabbits in Park Z was below 1,000 individuals in both the first and second years of the project.

Cevap

The population of wild rabbits in Park Z was below 1,000 individuals in both the first and second years of the project.
The passage establishes that a red fox decline in a given year occurs if and only if the rabbit population was below 1,000 in the preceding year. Since the red fox population declined in both the second and third years of the project, the rabbit population must have been below 1,000 in both the first and second years.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditional rules given in the passage.
Rabbit population < 1,000 in Year N leads to Red Fox decline in Year N+1. Rabbit population >= 1,000 in Year N prevents Red Fox decline in Year N+1.
This establishes a necessary and sufficient conditional link between the rabbit count in one year and the fox population trend in the following year.
2
Apply the observed outcomes for Years 2 and 3.
Red fox population declined in Year 2 (requiring Rabbit < 1,000 in Year 1) and declined in Year 3 (requiring Rabbit < 1,000 in Year 2).
By applying the contrapositive logic, any year experiencing a fox decline must have been preceded by a year with fewer than 1,000 rabbits.
3
Synthesize the valid logical deduction.
The rabbit population must have been below 1,000 during both Year 1 and Year 2.
This is the only conclusion that strictly must be true based solely on the provided premises.

Anahtar Kavram

Conditional Logic Deductions
Soru 40Soru

Read the following short argument and match each boldfaced statement to its specific structural role within the overall argument:

Telemedicine services expanded rapidly during recent public health initiatives. Many healthcare analysts predicted that this expansion would permanently reduce hospital emergency room visits. However, recent hospital administration data indicates that emergency room visits have returned to pre-expansion levels. Consequently, the expansion of telemedicine has not reduced the overall demand for emergency hospital care.

Match each boldfaced statement on the left with its corresponding role on the right.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

First boldfaced statement: 'Many healthcare analysts predicted that this expansion would permanently reduce hospital emergency room visits.'
Second boldfaced statement: 'Recent hospital administration data indicates that emergency room visits have returned to pre-expansion levels.'
Third boldfaced statement: 'The expansion of telemedicine has not reduced the overall demand for emergency hospital care.'

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The first boldfaced statement matches the opposing prediction that the argument challenges, the second boldfaced statement matches the factual evidence offered to counter that prediction, and the third boldfaced statement matches the main conclusion of the author.
The argument follows a classic rebuttal structure: it presents an outside prediction, introduces counter-evidence using the pivot 'However', and concludes with a main claim that contradicts the original prediction. Thus, the first statement is the opposed prediction, the second statement is the empirical premise/evidence, and the third statement is the main conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural role of the first boldfaced statement.
Identified as an opposing prediction.
It presents the view of healthcare analysts which the rest of the passage argues against.
2
Analyze the structural role of the second boldfaced statement.
Identified as supporting premise/evidence.
It provides factual data regarding hospital ER visits to disprove the analysts' expectation.
3
Analyze the structural role of the third boldfaced statement.
Identified as the main conclusion.
It follows the indicator word 'Consequently' and summarizes the primary assertion of the passage.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Boldface Statement Roles and Argument Structure
ÖncekiSayfa 2 / 9Sonraki
Critical Reasoning: Argument Evaluation Alıştırma Soruları — GMAT — Sayfa 2 | Examkin